ch03_block_ciphers_nemo (2) (1).ppt

Cryptography and
Network Security
Chapter 3
Fifth Edition
by William Stallings
Lecture slides by Lawrie Brown
Modified by Richard Newman

Chapter 3 – Block Ciphers and
the Data Encryption Standard
All the afternoon Mungo had been working on
Stern's code, principally with the aid of the latest
messages which he had copied down at the
Nevin Square drop. Stern was very confident.
He must be well aware London Central knew
about that drop. It was obvious that they didn't
care how often Mungo read their messages, so
confident were they in the impenetrability of the
code.
—Talking to Strange Men, Ruth Rendell

Modern Block Ciphers
 now look at modern block ciphers
 one of the most widely used types of
cryptographic algorithms
 provide secrecy /authentication services
 focus on DES (Data Encryption Standard)
 to illustrate block cipher design principles

Block vs Stream Ciphers
 block ciphers process messages in blocks,
each of which is then en/decrypted
 like a substitution on very big characters
 64-bits or more
 stream ciphers process messages a bit or
byte at a time when en/decrypting
 many current ciphers are block ciphers
 better analyzed
 broader range of applications

Block vs Stream Ciphers
 Q: What is a block cipher we have already
seen?
 A: Playfair cipher. What is its block size?
 A: 2 characters
 Q: What are some stream ciphers we have
already seen?
 A: Autokey cipher, Vigenere cipher,
Vernam cipher, OneTime Pad (OTP)

Block Cipher Principles
 most symmetric block ciphers are based on a
Feistel Cipher Structure
 needed since must be able to decrypt ciphertext
to recover messages efficiently
 block ciphers look like an extremely large
substitution
 would need table of 264 entries for a 64-bit block
 instead create from smaller building blocks
 using idea of a product cipher

Ideal Block Cipher
permutation

Claude Shannon and Substitution-
Permutation Ciphers
 Claude Shannon introduced idea of substitution-
permutation (S-P) networks in 1949 paper
 form basis of modern block ciphers
 S-P nets are based on the two primitive
cryptographic operations seen before:
 substitution (S-box)
 permutation (P-box)
 provide confusion & diffusion of message & key

Confusion and Diffusion
 cipher needs to completely obscure
statistical properties of original message
 a one-time pad does this
 more practically Shannon suggested
combining S & P elements to obtain:
 diffusion – dissipates statistical structure
of plaintext over bulk of ciphertext
 confusion – makes relationship between
ciphertext and key as complex as possible

Feistel Cipher Structure
 Horst Feistel devised the Feistel cipher
 based on concept of invertible product cipher
 partitions input block into two halves
 process through multiple rounds which
 perform a substitution on left data half
 based on round function of right half & subkey
 then have permutation swapping halves
 implements Shannon’s S-P net concept

Feistel Cipher Design Elements
 block size
 key size
 number of rounds
 subkey generation algorithm
 round function
 fast software en/decryption
 ease of analysis

Data Encryption Standard (DES)
 most widely used block cipher in world
 adopted in 1977 by NBS (now NIST)
 as FIPS PUB 46
 encrypts 64-bit data using 56-bit key
 has widespread use
 has been considerable controversy over
its security
 Now deprecated due to short key

DES History
 IBM developed Lucifer cipher
 by team led by Feistel in late 60’s
 used 64-bit data blocks with 128-bit key
 then redeveloped as a commercial cipher
with input from NSA and others
 in 1973 NBS issued request for proposals
for a national cipher standard
 IBM submitted their revised Lucifer which
was eventually accepted as the DES

DES Design Controversy
 although DES standard is public
 was considerable controversy over design
 in choice of 56-bit key (vs Lucifer 128-bit)
 and because design criteria were classified
 subsequent events and public analysis
show in fact design was appropriate
 use of DES has flourished
 especially in financial applications
 still standardized for legacy application use
 3DES still strong (112 bit key)

Initial Permutation IP
 first step of the data computation
 IP reorders the input data bits
 even bits to LH half, odd bits to RH half
 quite regular in structure (easy in h/w)
 no cryptographic value
 example:
IP(675a6967 5e5a6b5a) = (ffb2194d 004df6fb)

DES Round Structure
 uses two 32-bit L & R halves
 as for any Feistel cipher can describe as:
Li = Ri–1
Ri = Li–1  F(Ri–1, Ki)
 F takes 32-bit R half and 48-bit subkey:
 expands R to 48-bits using perm E
 adds to subkey using XOR
 passes through 8 S-boxes to get 32-bit result
 finally permutes using 32-bit perm P

DES Round Structure
Expansion Permutation
Right Half i-1
32
48
Keyed Substitution (8 S-Boxes)
48
Round Key i
48
32
32
32
Transposition (P-Box)
Mangled Right Half i-1
Left Half i-1
32
32
Right Half i
Left Half i
Mangler
Function
F
Left Half Key i-1 Right Half Key i-1
Left Shift(s) i Left Shift(s) i
Contraction Permutation
(permuted choice 2)
28 28
Left Half Key i-1 Right Half Key i-1
48

DES Expansion Permutation
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
28
29
24
25
21 20
16
17
13 12
4
5 8
9
32 1
Right Half i-1
 R half expanded to same length as 48-bit
subkey
 consider R as 8 nybbles (4 bits each)
 expansion permutation
 copies each nybble into the middle of a 6-bit
block
 copies the end bits of the two adjacent
nybbles into the two end bits of the 6-bit block

Substitution Boxes S
 have eight S-boxes which map 6 to 4 bits
 each S-box is actually 4 little 4 bit boxes
 outer bits 1 & 6 (row bits) select one row of 4
 inner bits 2-5 (col bits) are substituted
 result is 8 lots of 4 bits, or 32 bits
 row selection depends on both data & key
 feature known as autoclaving (autokeying)
 example:
 S(18 09 12 3d 11 17 38 39) = 5fd25e03

Substitution Boxes S
Si
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
 each of the eight s-
boxes is different
 each s-box reduces
6 bits to 4 bits
 so the 8 s-boxes
implement the 48-bit
to 32-bit contraction
substitution

Permutation Box P
 P-box applied at end of each round
 Increases diffusion/avalanche effect
S1 S2 S3 S4 S5 S6 S7 S8
16 1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8 9
10 11
12 13
14
15
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28
29 30
31 32
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32
16 1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8 9
10 11
12 13
14
15
17 18 19
20 21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28
29 30
31 32
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32

DES Round in Full
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
28
29
24
25
21 20
16
17
13 12
4
5 8
9
32 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40
S4
control
input symbol
output symbol
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
S3
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S5
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S6
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S7
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S8
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S1
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
S2
control
input symbol
output symbol
input symbol
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
Right Half i-1
Round Key i
1 2 3 4
5 6
7 8 11
12 13
14
15
16 17 18 9
10
21 22
23 24 25
26 27
28 19
20 31 32
29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30
O
+
O
+
Left Half i-1
Right Half i

Interpreting Permutations
 In the textbook, permutations are given as
tables
 The “inputs” are numbered from 1 to N
 The output positions are given by the
position of the input in the table
 Tables are in rows of 8 numbers per row
 So for example, the P-Box permutation
that takes bit 1 and moves it to bit 9 shows
this by having a “1” in the 9th position (the
first number on row 2)

DES Key Schedule
 forms subkeys used in each round
 initial permutation of the key (PC1) which
selects 56-bits in two 28-bit halves
 16 stages consisting of:
• rotating each half separately either 1 or 2 places
depending on the key rotation schedule K
• selecting 24-bits from each half & permuting them
by PC2 for use in round function F
 note practical use issues in h/w vs s/w

DES Key Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58
49 50 61 62
59 60 63 64
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40 51 52 53 54 55 56
49 50
64-bit key with parity bits
56-bit key
1 2 3 4
5
6
7
11 12
13
14
15
17 18
9 10 21
22
23
25 26 27 28
19 20
31 29
30
33 34 35 36 37
38
41 42 43 44 45
46
47 39
51 52 53
54
55
49 50
57 58 61
62
59 60 63
permuted
choice 1
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40 51 52 53 54 55 56
49 50
1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32 29
30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40 51 52 53 54 55 56
49 50
Left
Shift
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40 51 52 53 54 55 56
49 50
1 2
3 4
5 6 7
8
11 12 13
14 15 16
17 10
21 23
24 26 27
28 19 20 31 32
29
30 33 34 36
37
41 42
44
45 46
47 48 39
40 51
52 53
55 56
49 50
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
9 10 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
19 20 31 32
29 30 33 34 35 36 37 38 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48
39 40
permuted
choice 2
48-bit subkey

DES Decryption
 decrypt must unwind steps of data computation
 with Feistel design, do encryption steps again
using subkeys in reverse order (SK16 … SK1)
 IP undoes final FP step of encryption
 1st round with SK16 undoes 16th encrypt round
 ….
 16th round with SK1 undoes 1st encrypt round
 then final FP undoes initial encryption IP
 thus recovering original data value

DES Round Decryption
Left half i-1 Right half i-1
Left half i Right half i
Round key i
Mangler
Function
F
O
+
Decryption

Avalanche Effect
 key desirable property of encryption alg
 where a change of one input or key bit
results in changing approx half output bits
 making attempts to “home-in” by guessing
keys impossible
 DES exhibits strong avalanche

Avalanche in DES
original
modified

Strength of DES – Key Size
 56-bit keys have 256 = 7.2 x 1016 values
 brute force search looked hard
 advances have shown is possible
 in 1997 on Internet in a few months
 in 1998 on dedicated h/w (EFF) in a few days
 in 1999 above combined in 22hrs!
 still must be able to recognize plaintext
 Forced to consider alternatives to DES

Strength of DES – Analytic
Attacks
 now have several analytic attacks on DES
 these utilize some deep structure of the cipher
 by gathering information about encryptions
 can eventually recover some/all of the sub-key bits
 if necessary then exhaustively search for the rest
 generally these are statistical attacks
 differential cryptanalysis
 linear cryptanalysis
 related key attacks

Strength of DES – Timing
Attacks
 attacks actual implementation of cipher
 use knowledge of consequences of
implementation to derive information about
some/all subkey bits
 specifically use fact that calculations can
take varying times depending on the value
of the inputs to it
 particularly problematic on smartcards

Differential Cryptanalysis
 one of the most significant recent (public)
advances in cryptanalysis
 known by NSA in 70's cf DES design
 Murphy, Biham & Shamir published in 90’s
 powerful method to analyse block ciphers
 used to analyze most current block ciphers
with varying degrees of success
 DES reasonably resistant to it, cf Lucifer

 a statistical attack against Feistel ciphers
 uses cipher structure not previously used
 design of S-P networks has output of
function f influenced by both input & key
 hence cannot trace values back through
cipher without knowing value of the key
 differential cryptanalysis compares two
related pairs of encryptions (differential)

Compares Pairs of Encryptions
 Differential cryptanalysis compares two
related pairs of encryptions
 with known difference in the input m0||m1
 searching for a known difference in output
 when same subkeys are used

 have some input difference giving some
output difference with probability p
 if find instances of some higher probability
input / output difference pairs occurring
 can infer subkey that was used in round
 then must iterate process over many
rounds (with decreasing probabilities)

Overall probabilty
of given output
difference is
(0.25)(1.0)(0.25)
= 0.0625
Input round i
Input round i+1

 perform attack by repeatedly encrypting plaintext pairs
with known input XOR until obtain desired output XOR
 when found, assume intermediate deltas match
 if intermediate rounds match required XOR have a right pair
 if not then have a wrong pair, relative ratio is S/N for attack
 can then deduce keys values for the rounds
 right pairs suggest same key bits
 wrong pairs give random values
 for large numbers of rounds, probability is so low that
more pairs are required than exist with 64-bit inputs
 Biham and Shamir have shown how a 13-round
iterated characteristic can break the full 16-round DES

Linear Cryptanalysis
 another fairly recent development
 also a statistical method
 must be iterated over rounds, with
decreasing probabilities
 developed by Matsui et al in early 90's
 based on finding linear approximations
 can attack DES with 243 known plaintexts,
easier but still in practice infeasible

Linear Cryptanalysis
 find linear approximations with prob p != ½
P[i1,i2,...,ia]  C[j1,j2,...,jb] =
K[k1,k2,...,kc]
where ia,jb,kc are bit locations in P,C,K
 gives linear equation for key bits
 get one key bit using max likelihood alg
 using a large number of trial encryptions
 effectiveness given by: |p–1/2|

Seven Criteria for DES S-boxes
 No output bit of any S-box should be too close to a
linear function of the input bits
 Each row of an S-box should include all 16 possible
output bit combinations
 If two inputs to an S-box differ in exactly one bit, the
outputs must differ in at least two bits
 If two inputs to an S-box differ in the two middle bits,
the outputs must differ in >= 2 bits
 If two inputs differ in their first two bits and are
identical in last two bits, the two outputs must not be
the same
 For any nonzero 6-bit difference in inputs, no more
than 8 of the 32 pairs with that difference may result
in the same output difference

Three Criteria for DES P-box
 The four output bits from each S-box are
distributed so that two are “middle” bits and
two are “outer” bits in their nybbles
 The four output bits from each S-box affect six
different S-boxes in the next round, and no
two affect the same S-box
 For two S-boxes, j and k, if an output bit from
Sj affects a middle bit of Sk in the next round,
then an output bit from Sk cannot affect a
middle bit of Sj (so Sj output can't be a middle
bit of Sj in next round)

DES Design Criteria
 as reported by Coppersmith in [COPP94]
 7 criteria for S-boxes provide for
 non-linearity
 resistance to differential cryptanalysis
 good confusion
 3 criteria for permutation P provide for
 increased diffusion

Block Cipher Design
 basic principles still like Feistel’s in 1970’s
 number of rounds
 more is better, exhaustive search best attack
 function f:
 provides “confusion”, is nonlinear, avalanche
 have issues of how S-boxes are selected
 key schedule
 complex subkey creation, key avalanche

Summary
 have considered:
 block vs stream ciphers
 Feistel cipher design & structure
 DES
• details
• strength
 Differential & Linear Cryptanalysis
 block cipher design principles

ch03_block_ciphers_nemo (2) (1).ppt

More Related Content

Similar to ch03_block_ciphers_nemo (2) (1).ppt (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

ch03_block_ciphers_nemo (2) (1).ppt