SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Slide 7- 1
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Chapter 7
Relational Database Design by ER-
and EERR-to-Relational Mapping
Slide 7- 3
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Chapter Outline
 ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm
 Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types
 Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types
 Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types
 Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.
 Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.
 Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.
 Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.
 Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations
 Step 8: Options for Mapping Specialization or Generalization.
 Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).
Slide 7- 4
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm
 Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types.
 For each regular (strong) entity type E in the ER schema,
create a relation R that includes all the simple attributes of
E.
 Choose one of the key attributes of E as the primary key for
R.
 If the chosen key of E is composite, the set of simple
attributes that form it will together form the primary key of R.
 Example: We create the relations EMPLOYEE,
DEPARTMENT, and PROJECT in the relational schema
corresponding to the regular entities in the ER diagram.
 SSN, DNUMBER, and PNUMBER are the primary keys for
the relations EMPLOYEE, DEPARTMENT, and PROJECT
as shown.
Slide 7- 5
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.1
The ER conceptual schema diagram for the COMPANY database.
Slide 7- 6
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.2
Result of mapping the COMPANY ER schema into a relational schema.
Slide 7- 7
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types
 For each weak entity type W in the ER schema with owner entity
type E, create a relation R & include all simple attributes (or
simple components of composite attributes) of W as attributes of
R.
 Also, include as foreign key attributes of R the primary key
attribute(s) of the relation(s) that correspond to the owner entity
type(s).
 The primary key of R is the combination of the primary key(s) of
the owner(s) and the partial key of the weak entity type W, if any.
 Example: Create the relation DEPENDENT in this step to
correspond to the weak entity type DEPENDENT.
 Include the primary key SSN of the EMPLOYEE relation as a
foreign key attribute of DEPENDENT (renamed to ESSN).
 The primary key of the DEPENDENT relation is the combination
{ESSN, DEPENDENT_NAME} because DEPENDENT_NAME is
the partial key of DEPENDENT.
Slide 7- 8
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types
 For each binary 1:1 relationship type R in the ER schema, identify the
relations S and T that correspond to the entity types participating in R.
 There are three possible approaches:
1. Foreign Key approach: Choose one of the relations-say S-and include a
foreign key in S the primary key of T. It is better to choose an entity type
with total participation in R in the role of S.

Example: 1:1 relation MANAGES is mapped by choosing the participating
entity type DEPARTMENT to serve in the role of S, because its participation
in the MANAGES relationship type is total.
2. Merged relation option: An alternate mapping of a 1:1 relationship type
is possible by merging the two entity types and the relationship into a
single relation. This may be appropriate when both participations are
total.
3. Cross-reference or relationship relation option: The third alternative
is to set up a third relation R for the purpose of cross-referencing the
primary keys of the two relations S and T representing the entity types.
Slide 7- 9
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.
 For each regular binary 1:N relationship type R, identify the
relation S that represent the participating entity type at the
N-side of the relationship type.
 Include as foreign key in S the primary key of the relation T
that represents the other entity type participating in R.
 Include any simple attributes of the 1:N relation type as
attributes of S.
 Example: 1:N relationship types WORKS_FOR,
CONTROLS, and SUPERVISION in the figure.
 For WORKS_FOR we include the primary key DNUMBER
of the DEPARTMENT relation as foreign key in the
EMPLOYEE relation and call it DNO.
Slide 7- 10
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.
 For each regular binary M:N relationship type R, create a new
relation S to represent R.
 Include as foreign key attributes in S the primary keys of the
relations that represent the participating entity types; their
combination will form the primary key of S.
 Also include any simple attributes of the M:N relationship type (or
simple components of composite attributes) as attributes of S.
 Example: The M:N relationship type WORKS_ON from the
ER diagram is mapped by creating a relation WORKS_ON
in the relational database schema.
 The primary keys of the PROJECT and EMPLOYEE relations are
included as foreign keys in WORKS_ON and renamed PNO and
ESSN, respectively.
 Attribute HOURS in WORKS_ON represents the HOURS attribute of
the relation type. The primary key of the WORKS_ON relation is the
combination of the foreign key attributes {ESSN, PNO}.
Slide 7- 11
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.
 For each multivalued attribute A, create a new relation R.
 This relation R will include an attribute corresponding to A, plus the
primary key attribute K-as a foreign key in R-of the relation that
represents the entity type of relationship type that has A as an
attribute.
 The primary key of R is the combination of A and K. If the
multivalued attribute is composite, we include its simple
components.
 Example: The relation DEPT_LOCATIONS is created.
 The attribute DLOCATION represents the multivalued attribute
LOCATIONS of DEPARTMENT, while DNUMBER-as foreign key-
represents the primary key of the DEPARTMENT relation.
 The primary key of R is the combination of {DNUMBER,
DLOCATION}.
Slide 7- 12
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)
 Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.
 For each n-ary relationship type R, where n>2, create a new
relationship S to represent R.
 Include as foreign key attributes in S the primary keys of the
relations that represent the participating entity types.
 Also include any simple attributes of the n-ary relationship
type (or simple components of composite attributes) as
attributes of S.
 Example: The relationship type SUPPY in the ER on the
next slide.
 This can be mapped to the relation SUPPLY shown in the
relational schema, whose primary key is the combination of the
three foreign keys {SNAME, PARTNO, PROJNAME}
Slide 7- 13
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.11
Ternary relationship types. (a) The SUPPLY relationship.
Slide 7- 14
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.3
Mapping the n-ary relationship type SUPPLY from Figure 4.11a.
Slide 7- 15
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Summary of Mapping constructs and
constraints
Table 7.1 Correspondence between ER and Relational Models
ER Model Relational Model
Entity type “Entity” relation
1:1 or 1:N relationship type Foreign key (or “relationship” relation)
M:N relationship type “Relationship” relation and two foreign keys
n-ary relationship type “Relationship” relation and n foreign keys
Simple attribute Attribute
Composite attribute Set of simple component attributes
Multivalued attribute Relation and foreign key
Value set Domain
Key attribute Primary (or secondary) key
Slide 7- 16
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping EER Model Constructs to
Relations
 Step8: Options for Mapping Specialization or
Generalization.
 Convert each specialization with m subclasses {S1,
S2,….,Sm} and generalized superclass C, where the
attributes of C are {k,a1,…an} and k is the (primary)
key, into relational schemas using one of the four
following options:

Option 8A: Multiple relations-Superclass and
subclasses

Option 8B: Multiple relations-Subclass relations only

Option 8C: Single relation with one type attribute

Option 8D: Single relation with multiple type attributes
Slide 7- 17
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping EER Model Constructs to
Relations
 Option 8A: Multiple relations-Superclass and
subclasses
 Create a relation L for C with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1,…an}
and PK(L) = k. Create a relation Li for each subclass Si, 1 < i <
m, with the attributesAttrs(Li) = {k} U {attributes of Si} and
PK(Li)=k. This option works for any specialization (total or
partial, disjoint of over-lapping).
 Option 8B: Multiple relations-Subclass relations only
 Create a relation Li for each subclass Si, 1 < i < m, with the
attributes Attr(Li) = {attributes of Si} U {k,a1…,an} and PK(Li) =
k. This option only works for a specialization whose
subclasses are total (every entity in the superclass must
belong to (at least) one of the subclasses).
Slide 7- 18
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.4
EER diagram notation for an attribute-defined specialization on JobType.
Slide 7- 19
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.4
Options for mapping specialization or generalization.
(a) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.4 using option 8A.
Slide 7- 20
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.3
Generalization. (b) Generalizing CAR and TRUCK into the superclass VEHICLE.
Slide 7- 21
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.4
Options for mapping specialization or generalization.
(b) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.3b using option 8B.
Slide 7- 22
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations
(contd.)
 Option 8C: Single relation with one type attribute
 Create a single relation L with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1,…an} U
{attributes of S1} U…U {attributes of Sm} U {t} and PK(L) = k.
The attribute t is called a type (or discriminating) attribute that
indicates the subclass to which each tuple belongs
 Option 8D: Single relation with multiple type attributes
 Create a single relation schema L with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1,
…an} U {attributes of S1} U…U {attributes of Sm} U {t1, t2,…,tm}
and PK(L) = k. Each ti, 1 < I < m, is a Boolean type attribute
indicating whether a tuple belongs to the subclass Si.
Slide 7- 23
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.4
EER diagram notation for an attribute-defined specialization on JobType.
Slide 7- 24
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.4
Options for mapping specialization or generalization.
(c) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.4 using option 8C.
Slide 7- 25
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.5
EER diagram notation for an overlapping (non-disjoint) specialization.
Slide 7- 26
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.4
Options for mapping specialization or generalization. (d) Mapping Figure
4.5 using option 8D with Boolean type fields Mflag and Pflag.
Slide 7- 27
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping EER Model Constructs to
Relations (contd.)
 Mapping of Shared Subclasses (Multiple Inheritance)
 A shared subclass, such as STUDENT_ASSISTANT, is a
subclass of several classes, indicating multiple inheritance.
These classes must all have the same key attribute;
otherwise, the shared subclass would be modeled as a
category.
 We can apply any of the options discussed in Step 8 to a
shared subclass, subject to the restriction discussed in Step
8 of the mapping algorithm. Below both 8C and 8D are used
for the shared class STUDENT_ASSISTANT.
Slide 7- 28
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.7
A specialization lattice with multiple inheritance for a UNIVERSITY
database.
Slide 7- 29
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.5
Mapping the EER specialization lattice in Figure 4.6 using multiple
options.
Slide 7- 30
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping EER Model Constructs to
Relations (contd.)
 Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).
 For mapping a category whose defining superclass have
different keys, it is customary to specify a new key attribute,
called a surrogate key, when creating a relation to correspond
to the category.
 In the example below we can create a relation OWNER to
correspond to the OWNER category and include any attributes
of the category in this relation. The primary key of the OWNER
relation is the surrogate key, which we called OwnerId.
Slide 7- 31
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 4.8
Two categories (union types): OWNER and REGISTERED_VEHICLE.
Slide 7- 32
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
FIGURE 7.6
Mapping the EER categories (union types) in Figure 4.7 to relations.
Slide 7- 33
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Mapping Exercise
Exercise 7.4.
FIGURE 7.7
An ER schema for a
SHIP_TRACKING
database.
Slide 7- 34
Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
Chapter Summary
 ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm
 Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types
 Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types
 Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types
 Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.
 Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.
 Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.
 Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.
 Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations
 Step 8: Options for Mapping Specialization or Generalization.
 Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).

More Related Content

PPT
vdocuments.net_copyright-2007-ramez-elmasri-and-shamkant-b-navathe-slide-7-1.ppt
PPT
Chapter09.ppt
PPTX
Module_2_ER_to_relational_mapping_algorithm.pptx
PDF
RDBMS ER2 Relational
PPT
Relational-DB-design in database management system
PPT
Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations ADB_05_BRvs.ppt
DOCX
ER to relational Mapping: Data base design using ER to relational language. C...
vdocuments.net_copyright-2007-ramez-elmasri-and-shamkant-b-navathe-slide-7-1.ppt
Chapter09.ppt
Module_2_ER_to_relational_mapping_algorithm.pptx
RDBMS ER2 Relational
Relational-DB-design in database management system
Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations ADB_05_BRvs.ppt
ER to relational Mapping: Data base design using ER to relational language. C...

Similar to ch07-Relational Database Design by ER- and EERR-to-Relational Mapping.pdf (20)

PDF
DBMS seminar.pdf mapping eer model to relational model
PPT
Databases chapter 6 about databases data and sql
PPT
Er & eer to relational mapping
PPT
Mapping
PDF
Web app development_database_design_er-mapping_12
PPTX
ERD_to_Rel2.PPThhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.pptx
PDF
Pokok Bahasan 06 ER-EER to Relational Mapping (1).pdf
PPTX
Logical database design and the relational model(database)
PPT
Ch 6 Logical D B Design
PPTX
logical data base design ,data base , .pptx
PDF
Mapping example
PDF
Mapping example
DOCX
Relational database design by er and err-to-relational ma
PPT
chapter number 05Corrected local database.ppt
PPTX
Entity Relationship Diagram – ER Diagram in DBMS.pptx
PPT
Kul 2
PPT
The Database Environment Chapter 5
PPTX
DBMS: ER Model Basics with a good description
PDF
Unit 2 DBMS
DBMS seminar.pdf mapping eer model to relational model
Databases chapter 6 about databases data and sql
Er & eer to relational mapping
Mapping
Web app development_database_design_er-mapping_12
ERD_to_Rel2.PPThhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.pptx
Pokok Bahasan 06 ER-EER to Relational Mapping (1).pdf
Logical database design and the relational model(database)
Ch 6 Logical D B Design
logical data base design ,data base , .pptx
Mapping example
Mapping example
Relational database design by er and err-to-relational ma
chapter number 05Corrected local database.ppt
Entity Relationship Diagram – ER Diagram in DBMS.pptx
Kul 2
The Database Environment Chapter 5
DBMS: ER Model Basics with a good description
Unit 2 DBMS
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
web development for engineering and engineering
PPT
Project quality management in manufacturing
PDF
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPTX
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
PPTX
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
PDF
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
PDF
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PPTX
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
DOCX
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
PPTX
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
PPTX
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
DOCX
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
PDF
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PDF
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
web development for engineering and engineering
Project quality management in manufacturing
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
Construction Project Organization Group 2.pptx
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
Enhancing Cyber Defense Against Zero-Day Attacks using Ensemble Neural Networks
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
additive manufacturing of ss316l using mig welding
Artificial Intelligence
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
573137875-Attendance-Management-System-original
Unit I ESSENTIAL OF DIGITAL MARKETING.pdf
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
Ad

ch07-Relational Database Design by ER- and EERR-to-Relational Mapping.pdf

  • 1. Slide 7- 1 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe
  • 2. Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter 7 Relational Database Design by ER- and EERR-to-Relational Mapping
  • 3. Slide 7- 3 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter Outline  ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm  Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types  Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types  Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types  Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.  Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.  Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.  Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.  Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations  Step 8: Options for Mapping Specialization or Generalization.  Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).
  • 4. Slide 7- 4 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm  Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types.  For each regular (strong) entity type E in the ER schema, create a relation R that includes all the simple attributes of E.  Choose one of the key attributes of E as the primary key for R.  If the chosen key of E is composite, the set of simple attributes that form it will together form the primary key of R.  Example: We create the relations EMPLOYEE, DEPARTMENT, and PROJECT in the relational schema corresponding to the regular entities in the ER diagram.  SSN, DNUMBER, and PNUMBER are the primary keys for the relations EMPLOYEE, DEPARTMENT, and PROJECT as shown.
  • 5. Slide 7- 5 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.1 The ER conceptual schema diagram for the COMPANY database.
  • 6. Slide 7- 6 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.2 Result of mapping the COMPANY ER schema into a relational schema.
  • 7. Slide 7- 7 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types  For each weak entity type W in the ER schema with owner entity type E, create a relation R & include all simple attributes (or simple components of composite attributes) of W as attributes of R.  Also, include as foreign key attributes of R the primary key attribute(s) of the relation(s) that correspond to the owner entity type(s).  The primary key of R is the combination of the primary key(s) of the owner(s) and the partial key of the weak entity type W, if any.  Example: Create the relation DEPENDENT in this step to correspond to the weak entity type DEPENDENT.  Include the primary key SSN of the EMPLOYEE relation as a foreign key attribute of DEPENDENT (renamed to ESSN).  The primary key of the DEPENDENT relation is the combination {ESSN, DEPENDENT_NAME} because DEPENDENT_NAME is the partial key of DEPENDENT.
  • 8. Slide 7- 8 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types  For each binary 1:1 relationship type R in the ER schema, identify the relations S and T that correspond to the entity types participating in R.  There are three possible approaches: 1. Foreign Key approach: Choose one of the relations-say S-and include a foreign key in S the primary key of T. It is better to choose an entity type with total participation in R in the role of S.  Example: 1:1 relation MANAGES is mapped by choosing the participating entity type DEPARTMENT to serve in the role of S, because its participation in the MANAGES relationship type is total. 2. Merged relation option: An alternate mapping of a 1:1 relationship type is possible by merging the two entity types and the relationship into a single relation. This may be appropriate when both participations are total. 3. Cross-reference or relationship relation option: The third alternative is to set up a third relation R for the purpose of cross-referencing the primary keys of the two relations S and T representing the entity types.
  • 9. Slide 7- 9 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.  For each regular binary 1:N relationship type R, identify the relation S that represent the participating entity type at the N-side of the relationship type.  Include as foreign key in S the primary key of the relation T that represents the other entity type participating in R.  Include any simple attributes of the 1:N relation type as attributes of S.  Example: 1:N relationship types WORKS_FOR, CONTROLS, and SUPERVISION in the figure.  For WORKS_FOR we include the primary key DNUMBER of the DEPARTMENT relation as foreign key in the EMPLOYEE relation and call it DNO.
  • 10. Slide 7- 10 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.  For each regular binary M:N relationship type R, create a new relation S to represent R.  Include as foreign key attributes in S the primary keys of the relations that represent the participating entity types; their combination will form the primary key of S.  Also include any simple attributes of the M:N relationship type (or simple components of composite attributes) as attributes of S.  Example: The M:N relationship type WORKS_ON from the ER diagram is mapped by creating a relation WORKS_ON in the relational database schema.  The primary keys of the PROJECT and EMPLOYEE relations are included as foreign keys in WORKS_ON and renamed PNO and ESSN, respectively.  Attribute HOURS in WORKS_ON represents the HOURS attribute of the relation type. The primary key of the WORKS_ON relation is the combination of the foreign key attributes {ESSN, PNO}.
  • 11. Slide 7- 11 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.  For each multivalued attribute A, create a new relation R.  This relation R will include an attribute corresponding to A, plus the primary key attribute K-as a foreign key in R-of the relation that represents the entity type of relationship type that has A as an attribute.  The primary key of R is the combination of A and K. If the multivalued attribute is composite, we include its simple components.  Example: The relation DEPT_LOCATIONS is created.  The attribute DLOCATION represents the multivalued attribute LOCATIONS of DEPARTMENT, while DNUMBER-as foreign key- represents the primary key of the DEPARTMENT relation.  The primary key of R is the combination of {DNUMBER, DLOCATION}.
  • 12. Slide 7- 12 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm (contd.)  Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.  For each n-ary relationship type R, where n>2, create a new relationship S to represent R.  Include as foreign key attributes in S the primary keys of the relations that represent the participating entity types.  Also include any simple attributes of the n-ary relationship type (or simple components of composite attributes) as attributes of S.  Example: The relationship type SUPPY in the ER on the next slide.  This can be mapped to the relation SUPPLY shown in the relational schema, whose primary key is the combination of the three foreign keys {SNAME, PARTNO, PROJNAME}
  • 13. Slide 7- 13 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.11 Ternary relationship types. (a) The SUPPLY relationship.
  • 14. Slide 7- 14 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.3 Mapping the n-ary relationship type SUPPLY from Figure 4.11a.
  • 15. Slide 7- 15 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Summary of Mapping constructs and constraints Table 7.1 Correspondence between ER and Relational Models ER Model Relational Model Entity type “Entity” relation 1:1 or 1:N relationship type Foreign key (or “relationship” relation) M:N relationship type “Relationship” relation and two foreign keys n-ary relationship type “Relationship” relation and n foreign keys Simple attribute Attribute Composite attribute Set of simple component attributes Multivalued attribute Relation and foreign key Value set Domain Key attribute Primary (or secondary) key
  • 16. Slide 7- 16 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations  Step8: Options for Mapping Specialization or Generalization.  Convert each specialization with m subclasses {S1, S2,….,Sm} and generalized superclass C, where the attributes of C are {k,a1,…an} and k is the (primary) key, into relational schemas using one of the four following options:  Option 8A: Multiple relations-Superclass and subclasses  Option 8B: Multiple relations-Subclass relations only  Option 8C: Single relation with one type attribute  Option 8D: Single relation with multiple type attributes
  • 17. Slide 7- 17 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations  Option 8A: Multiple relations-Superclass and subclasses  Create a relation L for C with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1,…an} and PK(L) = k. Create a relation Li for each subclass Si, 1 < i < m, with the attributesAttrs(Li) = {k} U {attributes of Si} and PK(Li)=k. This option works for any specialization (total or partial, disjoint of over-lapping).  Option 8B: Multiple relations-Subclass relations only  Create a relation Li for each subclass Si, 1 < i < m, with the attributes Attr(Li) = {attributes of Si} U {k,a1…,an} and PK(Li) = k. This option only works for a specialization whose subclasses are total (every entity in the superclass must belong to (at least) one of the subclasses).
  • 18. Slide 7- 18 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.4 EER diagram notation for an attribute-defined specialization on JobType.
  • 19. Slide 7- 19 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.4 Options for mapping specialization or generalization. (a) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.4 using option 8A.
  • 20. Slide 7- 20 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.3 Generalization. (b) Generalizing CAR and TRUCK into the superclass VEHICLE.
  • 21. Slide 7- 21 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.4 Options for mapping specialization or generalization. (b) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.3b using option 8B.
  • 22. Slide 7- 22 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations (contd.)  Option 8C: Single relation with one type attribute  Create a single relation L with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1,…an} U {attributes of S1} U…U {attributes of Sm} U {t} and PK(L) = k. The attribute t is called a type (or discriminating) attribute that indicates the subclass to which each tuple belongs  Option 8D: Single relation with multiple type attributes  Create a single relation schema L with attributes Attrs(L) = {k,a1, …an} U {attributes of S1} U…U {attributes of Sm} U {t1, t2,…,tm} and PK(L) = k. Each ti, 1 < I < m, is a Boolean type attribute indicating whether a tuple belongs to the subclass Si.
  • 23. Slide 7- 23 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.4 EER diagram notation for an attribute-defined specialization on JobType.
  • 24. Slide 7- 24 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.4 Options for mapping specialization or generalization. (c) Mapping the EER schema in Figure 4.4 using option 8C.
  • 25. Slide 7- 25 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.5 EER diagram notation for an overlapping (non-disjoint) specialization.
  • 26. Slide 7- 26 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.4 Options for mapping specialization or generalization. (d) Mapping Figure 4.5 using option 8D with Boolean type fields Mflag and Pflag.
  • 27. Slide 7- 27 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations (contd.)  Mapping of Shared Subclasses (Multiple Inheritance)  A shared subclass, such as STUDENT_ASSISTANT, is a subclass of several classes, indicating multiple inheritance. These classes must all have the same key attribute; otherwise, the shared subclass would be modeled as a category.  We can apply any of the options discussed in Step 8 to a shared subclass, subject to the restriction discussed in Step 8 of the mapping algorithm. Below both 8C and 8D are used for the shared class STUDENT_ASSISTANT.
  • 28. Slide 7- 28 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.7 A specialization lattice with multiple inheritance for a UNIVERSITY database.
  • 29. Slide 7- 29 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.5 Mapping the EER specialization lattice in Figure 4.6 using multiple options.
  • 30. Slide 7- 30 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations (contd.)  Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).  For mapping a category whose defining superclass have different keys, it is customary to specify a new key attribute, called a surrogate key, when creating a relation to correspond to the category.  In the example below we can create a relation OWNER to correspond to the OWNER category and include any attributes of the category in this relation. The primary key of the OWNER relation is the surrogate key, which we called OwnerId.
  • 31. Slide 7- 31 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 4.8 Two categories (union types): OWNER and REGISTERED_VEHICLE.
  • 32. Slide 7- 32 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe FIGURE 7.6 Mapping the EER categories (union types) in Figure 4.7 to relations.
  • 33. Slide 7- 33 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Mapping Exercise Exercise 7.4. FIGURE 7.7 An ER schema for a SHIP_TRACKING database.
  • 34. Slide 7- 34 Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Chapter Summary  ER-to-Relational Mapping Algorithm  Step 1: Mapping of Regular Entity Types  Step 2: Mapping of Weak Entity Types  Step 3: Mapping of Binary 1:1 Relation Types  Step 4: Mapping of Binary 1:N Relationship Types.  Step 5: Mapping of Binary M:N Relationship Types.  Step 6: Mapping of Multivalued attributes.  Step 7: Mapping of N-ary Relationship Types.  Mapping EER Model Constructs to Relations  Step 8: Options for Mapping Specialization or Generalization.  Step 9: Mapping of Union Types (Categories).