SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Challenges with manual vulnerability
assessments and manual penetration
testing
The biggest challenge with manual vulnerability assessments and
penetration testing is that it’s slow, expensive, and doesn’t scale with
modern CI/CD strategies. It can take weeks or even months to find and
exploit all the vulnerabilities in a system. And it’s challenging for security
teams to keep up with the ever-changing landscape of security threats.
The first challenge is about the pentesting coverage. Security pentesters
can only test what they know and see. They need to be aware of all the
potential vulnerabilities in order to exploit them. But with new security
threats emerging every day, it’s impossible for pentesters to know
everything.
The second challenge is about the accuracy of the findings in pentesting
results. Usually, there are lots of false positives and true negatives in the
findings of pentesters. This is because pentesters can only test the
reachable attack surface that they see and know. It’s impossible for them to
exploit every possible vulnerable endpoint in a system. And it’s also difficult
for pentesters to understand how an application works in its code level, so
it’s easy for them to have lots of false positives or true negatives in their
findings.
The next challenge for manual pentesting is triage validation of the results.
Security teams need to verify all the findings and prioritize which ones are
critical so they can be fixed. This is a very time-consuming process that
takes lots of effort from security professionals. And it’s difficult for them to
prioritize based on their knowledge and experience.
The last challenge with manual pentesting which we want to talk about here
is CI / CD integration. It is not possible to integrate pentesing to application
developers pipeline and create an automated system out of that.
Pentesters need to manually review and validate the findings from their
pentesting results which is not possible to automate
.
These are the top six challenges with manual vulnerability assessments
and penetration testing. We hope you enjoyed this post!

More Related Content

DOCX
Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing Framework by Falgun Rathod
PPTX
How to Perform Continuous Vulnerability Management
PDF
Malware Analyst: Guardians Of The Digital Realm
PDF
idsecconf2023 - Mangatas Tondang, Wahyu Nuryanto - Penerapan Model Detection ...
DOCX
Automated vs Manual Penetration Testing - Which Should You Choose
PDF
Which Security Testing Technique is Best for Testing Applications.pdf
PDF
Security operations center 5 security controls
KEY
Vulnerability Ass... Penetrate What?
Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing Framework by Falgun Rathod
How to Perform Continuous Vulnerability Management
Malware Analyst: Guardians Of The Digital Realm
idsecconf2023 - Mangatas Tondang, Wahyu Nuryanto - Penerapan Model Detection ...
Automated vs Manual Penetration Testing - Which Should You Choose
Which Security Testing Technique is Best for Testing Applications.pdf
Security operations center 5 security controls
Vulnerability Ass... Penetrate What?

Similar to Challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and manual penetration testing (20)

PDF
Cyber Security Company.pdf
PDF
Demystifying Penetration Testing: A Comprehensive Guide for Security Enhancement
PDF
Hybrid model for penetration testing
PDF
There are 7 stages in Software Development LifeCycle. Coming to SDLC.pdf
PDF
Software risk management
PDF
Vulnerability Analyst interview Questions.pdf
PDF
ByteCode pentest report example
PDF
PPTX
Protect Against 85% of Cyberattacks
PPT
Consensus Audit Guidelines 2008
DOCX
Education & Training39SecurityMagazine.com SECURITY JU
PPTX
Mike Spaulding - Building an Application Security Program
PPTX
Building an AppSec Team Extended Cut
PDF
Key Cybersecurity Risks and Mitigation Strategies in 2023 | The Enterprise World
PPTX
Penetration Testing for Cybersecurity Professionals
PDF
Vulnerability Management
PDF
How to Become a Cyber Security Analyst in 2021..
PDF
Penetration Testing Guide
DOC
Five Mistakes of Vulnerability Management
Cyber Security Company.pdf
Demystifying Penetration Testing: A Comprehensive Guide for Security Enhancement
Hybrid model for penetration testing
There are 7 stages in Software Development LifeCycle. Coming to SDLC.pdf
Software risk management
Vulnerability Analyst interview Questions.pdf
ByteCode pentest report example
Protect Against 85% of Cyberattacks
Consensus Audit Guidelines 2008
Education & Training39SecurityMagazine.com SECURITY JU
Mike Spaulding - Building an Application Security Program
Building an AppSec Team Extended Cut
Key Cybersecurity Risks and Mitigation Strategies in 2023 | The Enterprise World
Penetration Testing for Cybersecurity Professionals
Vulnerability Management
How to Become a Cyber Security Analyst in 2021..
Penetration Testing Guide
Five Mistakes of Vulnerability Management
Ad

More from Prancer Io (20)

PDF
Prancer Enterprise has achieved SOC 2 Type I compliance in accordance with Am...
PDF
Prancer Enterprise announces today the release of the Zero Trust Security Val...
PDF
Prancer for Offensive Security Testing
PDF
Why do Next-generation snapshot scanning security solutions raise security co...
PDF
Announcing the launch of Red and Blue Cyber Security Show
PDF
9 tips for assessing your modern cloud security toolsets.pdf
PDF
Infrastructure as Code
PDF
IAC Compliance.pdf
PDF
IaC Security and Continuous Compliance
PDF
IaC Security and Continuous Compliance
PDF
Security Validation as Code
PDF
Automated Pentesting vs Dynamic Application Security Testing
PDF
Security Validation
PDF
Cloud Security Validation at Scale
PDF
Security Validation as Code.pdf
PDF
Prancer web interface for the ease of use
PDF
What are the configuration files in the prancer framework
PDF
Automated pentesting vs dynamic application security testing (dast) (2)
PDF
Is iac scanning scalable in the git ops era
PDF
Prancer web interface for the ease of use
Prancer Enterprise has achieved SOC 2 Type I compliance in accordance with Am...
Prancer Enterprise announces today the release of the Zero Trust Security Val...
Prancer for Offensive Security Testing
Why do Next-generation snapshot scanning security solutions raise security co...
Announcing the launch of Red and Blue Cyber Security Show
9 tips for assessing your modern cloud security toolsets.pdf
Infrastructure as Code
IAC Compliance.pdf
IaC Security and Continuous Compliance
IaC Security and Continuous Compliance
Security Validation as Code
Automated Pentesting vs Dynamic Application Security Testing
Security Validation
Cloud Security Validation at Scale
Security Validation as Code.pdf
Prancer web interface for the ease of use
What are the configuration files in the prancer framework
Automated pentesting vs dynamic application security testing (dast) (2)
Is iac scanning scalable in the git ops era
Prancer web interface for the ease of use
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
PDF
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
PDF
A novel scalable deep ensemble learning framework for big data classification...
PPTX
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
PDF
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
PDF
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
PPTX
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
PDF
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
PDF
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
PDF
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
PDF
Heart disease approach using modified random forest and particle swarm optimi...
PDF
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
PDF
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
PDF
WOOl fibre morphology and structure.pdf for textiles
PPTX
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
PPTX
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
PPTX
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
PDF
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
PPTX
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
PDF
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf
Unlocking AI with Model Context Protocol (MCP)
Univ-Connecticut-ChatGPT-Presentaion.pdf
A novel scalable deep ensemble learning framework for big data classification...
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
Encapsulation theory and applications.pdf
Accuracy of neural networks in brain wave diagnosis of schizophrenia
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
7 ChatGPT Prompts to Help You Define Your Ideal Customer Profile.pdf
gpt5_lecture_notes_comprehensive_20250812015547.pdf
Enhancing emotion recognition model for a student engagement use case through...
Heart disease approach using modified random forest and particle swarm optimi...
Getting Started with Data Integration: FME Form 101
NewMind AI Weekly Chronicles - August'25-Week II
WOOl fibre morphology and structure.pdf for textiles
1. Introduction to Computer Programming.pptx
SOPHOS-XG Firewall Administrator PPT.pptx
Programs and apps: productivity, graphics, security and other tools
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
A Presentation on Artificial Intelligence
1 - Historical Antecedents, Social Consideration.pdf

Challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and manual penetration testing

  • 1. Challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and manual penetration testing The biggest challenge with manual vulnerability assessments and penetration testing is that it’s slow, expensive, and doesn’t scale with modern CI/CD strategies. It can take weeks or even months to find and exploit all the vulnerabilities in a system. And it’s challenging for security teams to keep up with the ever-changing landscape of security threats. The first challenge is about the pentesting coverage. Security pentesters can only test what they know and see. They need to be aware of all the potential vulnerabilities in order to exploit them. But with new security threats emerging every day, it’s impossible for pentesters to know everything. The second challenge is about the accuracy of the findings in pentesting results. Usually, there are lots of false positives and true negatives in the findings of pentesters. This is because pentesters can only test the reachable attack surface that they see and know. It’s impossible for them to exploit every possible vulnerable endpoint in a system. And it’s also difficult
  • 2. for pentesters to understand how an application works in its code level, so it’s easy for them to have lots of false positives or true negatives in their findings. The next challenge for manual pentesting is triage validation of the results. Security teams need to verify all the findings and prioritize which ones are critical so they can be fixed. This is a very time-consuming process that takes lots of effort from security professionals. And it’s difficult for them to prioritize based on their knowledge and experience. The last challenge with manual pentesting which we want to talk about here is CI / CD integration. It is not possible to integrate pentesing to application developers pipeline and create an automated system out of that. Pentesters need to manually review and validate the findings from their pentesting results which is not possible to automate . These are the top six challenges with manual vulnerability assessments and penetration testing. We hope you enjoyed this post!