Charting the Course: Mapping the Career Practitioners Role in Supporting People with Mental Health Challenges. course project final report

CHARTING THE COURSE:
MAPPING THE CAREER PRACTITIONER ROLE IN
SUPPORTING PEOPLE WITH MENTAL HEALTH
CHALLENGES
Final Project Report
Neasa Martin, Project Researcher
Submitted to
Nova Scotia Career Development Association &
Canadian Education and Research Institute for Counselling
November, 20th 2012

Sponsored by the Nova Scotia Career Development Association 2/33
REPORT INDEX
Introduction - Project Context…………….3
Project Goals & Objectives……………….4
Steps Taken………………………………...5
Survey Process…………………………….6
Survey Results……………………………..7
Consultation Process……………………..16
Recommendations..……………………….17
Project Challenges…………………………21
Lessons Learned…………………………. 22
Acknowledgements………………………..23
References & Notes…………………….…24
Appendices…………………………………25

Prepared by Neasa Martin & Associates 3/33
INTRODUCTION -PROJECT CONTEXT
Employment is a cornerstone of social inclusion. It provides identity, purpose, meaning, social
connections, as well as the financial resources needed to participate in one‟s community.
i
,
ii
People living with mental health issues face the highest unemployment rate of any disability
group and for many, work remains an illusive goal. Being left out of work leads to material
deprivation, poverty, worsens physical and mental health, increases family burden, weakens
social ties and creates a sense of personal shame.
iii
,
iv
Although people want to work, they report
that stigma, discrimination, restrictive public policies and limited access to needed supports and
services play a critical role in their exclusion from the workforce - beyond the limitations of their
illness.
v
Mental-health related illnesses are the fastest growing occupational disability within Canada and
are the single biggest cause of work-place disability leave. Sixty percent of workdays lost are due
to depression and 1 in 20 workers will be diagnosed with a mental health problem/illness. Work-
related mental illness & substance misuse is estimated to cost the Canadian economy $33 billion
annually.
vi
How well these issues are identified and managed can dramatically impact time off,
disability costs and successful return to employment. Employers are recognizing the need to
enhance knowledge and skills in addressing work-place mental health problems early, and that
profitability is tied to supporting a mentally healthy and engaged workforce. A changing legal
landscape, at federal and provincial levels, is placing a legal duty of care on employers to
address workplace mental health, safety, and inclusion and an increasingly litigious workforce is
creating incentive to take proactive steps. A focus on creating mentally healthy workplaces is
being seen as beneficial to all employees and represents a window of opportunity for moving
people identified with mental illness back into the workforce.
Career practitioners (CPs) across Nova Scotia report finding more of their clients are disclosing
mental health issues as a factor in their unemployment and as an element in their career-planning
journey. CPs are critical gatekeepers to employment and report feeling challenged in
understanding and responding to this expanding need. Current knowledge, skills, attitudes, and
funding practices are being identified as potential barriers to providing quality service. This
project is about engaging partners from across Nova Scotia to assess the level of stigma and
discrimination people with mental health problems/illnesses face within the career planning
context and to identify the knowledge, skills and resources career practitioners need to
successfully enhance their employment support and social inclusion.

PROJECT GOALS
The Nova Scotia Career Development Association took on sponsorship for this project based on
its established leadership role in professional development for career practitioners and its
commitment to promoting client-centred services. The goal of this project is to identify how
career practitioners can best assist increasing numbers of clients with mental health
problems/illness in their job search/career-planning journey. When career practitioners have the
right information and supports they are powerful agents in supporting clients to enter, retain,
return to traditional employment or to support those who may have given up seeking work. There
is currently no systematic training in Nova Scotia for career practitioners on mental health
employment issues to guide their actions. This project is intended to test assumptions about the
impact of stigma, identify learning needs, build a shared understanding and create a collaborative
action plan.
The project objectives include:
1. Building knowledge of evidence-based best practices and ways to reduce stigma and
discrimination within the counselling relationship.
2. Defining the educational and training needs of career counsellors in supporting mental
health clients.
3. Creating a multi-sector strategy on the policy and practice that enhance employment
and changes required to strengthen employment-related social inclusion. Confirm an
agreement to act.
STEPS TAKEN
A transformational research project approach was taken to build a common understanding on
stigma and discrimination and change attitudes and practices. Using an iterative learning
approach each project step helped to build knowledge, insight and create agreement for action.
1. We developed a Charting the Course project website to support information sharing
including: mental health & employment facts, finding mental health resources in Nova Scotia,
understanding mental illness, self-directed resources, consumer-focused employment
resources, educational and family resources, A project blog was used for updates and
resource sharing.

2. We recruited a Project Advisory Committee to provide leadership and facilitate community
linkages including service users, employment
counsellors, and program managers.
3. We created an on-line survey of career
practitioners. Knowledge, skills, training needs
and concerns were identified. Survey of clients
with self identified mental health issues accessing
career services was undertaken to explore their
experience and needs.
4. We hosted regional education & focus groups with
career practitioners, guidance counsellors,
vocational services, educators, and policy
planners. A presentation on mental health stigma,
discrimination, and best practices in its reduction
was delivered.
5. We held a province-wide roundtable meeting with
Career Centre Managers to confirm findings and
identify organizational opportunities.
6. Project findings were presented at the 7th annual
Tools For Life Conference.
7. Project findings were presented at Cannexus
2012 and input sought. The presentation was
recorded and available on Virtual Cannexus.
8. A pre-conference provincial roundtable sponsored by NSCDA brought together career
practitioners, educators, policy makers and people living with mental health problems to
create a joint strategy to bridge the knowledge and skill gaps identified through the project.
9. A summary report of the feedback was distributed to stakeholder to confirm accuracy and
agreement (Appendix A).
10. Project results were presented at NSCDA‟s Hope Filled Approaches to Career Development
conference.
11. Discussion with government policy planners and community leaders are underway to link
project goals to existing activities, and build an agreement to act on recommendation.
PROJECT NUMBERS
Survey: 266 (176 Career Practitioners, 90
Service Users)
NS regional meetings: 5 meetings (100
participants)
Program Managers: 2 meetings (50
participants)
Cannexus 2012 Workshop: 45 participants
CERIC Webinar:
http://cannexus.scholarlab.ca/home
Tools for Life Conference: 1000 participants.
NSCDA Provincial Roundtable: 29 participants
Hope & Recovery Conference: 23 participants
Charting the Course website usage: 15,720
hits
Web usage: 15,720 hits

12. A project summary and recommended next steps was presented to the Board of Directors of
the NSCDA for approval. (Appendix B) Next steps were approved.
13. The final project steps include: a) Presentation & roundtable workshop at Cannexus 2013,
and b) submission to The Canadian Journal of Career Development.
SURVEY PROCESS
Two-online anonymous surveys, using Survey Monkey,
vii
were developed in consultation with the
Project Advisory Committee using qualitative and quantitative questions. The definition of mental
illness, and stigma survey tool, drew upon the Mental Health Commission of Canada‟s framing to
facilitate future comparisons. Survey links were posted to the NSCDA website, and distributed by
email through its membership. A province-wide Career Managers Group was recruited to serve
as project champions. Stakeholder groups with an interest and role in delivering specialized
mental health career planning services were targeted (i.e. Canadian Mental Health Association -
N.S., Psychosocial Rehabilitation Canada - N.S.). Participation was built using a „snowball
recruitment‟ approach. Employment Counsellors
within the Department of Community Services and
the College and University Counselling Services
were included in the survey process.
Over the project‟s first six months, all clients
accessing career-counselling services were invited to
participate in a voluntary and anonymous on-line
survey. We sub-selected those clients who self
disclosed having a mental health issue. Findings
presented are based on this sub-group. Mental
health service users were also recruited through specialized disability services, the Self-Help
Resource Centre, family organizations, mental health community-based and hospital services. A
Client Engagement Tool was developed to support recruitment. The Charting the Course website
was used as a central repository for survey tools and related resources, and to provide ongoing
project updates.
Stakeholders were asked in the survey to identify current strengths, gaps, issues, and concerns
that CPs face in supporting people to reach their career/ employment goals. Through a
Definition of mental health problem used: “An
emotional or mental health condition that may
need treatment from a health professional. This
includes any mental disorder that significantly
interferes with a person's functioning (mood &
anxiety disorders, psychotic disorders, excessive
stress, substance abuse, gambling disorder etc.)
MHCC

combination of on-line surveys, key informant interviews, sector-specific consultations,
presentations, and roundtable plenary sessions, we identified policy, practice, educational needs
and strategies required to remove attitudinal and behavioural barriers and suggestions for
improve accessing career counselling. Using iterative engagement process findings were
continuously refined and confirmed with stakeholders. The goal was to build agreement and a
commitment to act of the survey findings.
SURVEY FINDINGS
SURVEY PARTICIPANTS
266 survey participants (81.5% completion rate)
176 Career practitioners 90 Clients
> 50% work as career practitioners, 5% at a
Masters level. ⅓ working in career centres.
14% mental health professional. 85% provide
individual counselling.
62% female, 38% male. 41% under 40 years
old, 46% live in Halifax, 47% have
college/trade certificate, 20% are university
graduates. 6% have a graduate degree. 14%
hold a high school diploma.
91% are working with mental health clients. 34% unemployed (30% < one year, 56% < 5
years, 11% unemployed > 6 years. 4% no
work history.
57% feel disclosure is increasing, 27% don’t
know.
62% report mental health problems
46% of CPs report a personal history of
mental health problems. *see definition below.
Income: 43% salary, 51% government
pension (40% prov. 11% CPP, 17% training
student loans), 6% supported by friends,
family, or savings.
viii
CONTACT & DISCLOSURE
At the outset of this project, Career Practitioners (CPs) felt there were greater numbers of clients
presenting with mental health issues as a factor in their employment. There were also concerns
raised of whether these clients “belonged” in mainstream services or would they be better served
through specialized programs. Research on stigma and discrimination reveals that positive
contact to people with a mental illness is critical in shifting negative attitudes and discriminatory
behaviours. Through the survey 91% of CPs reported that they are currently working with mental

health clients. Fifty-seven percent agreed that the levels of disclosure within the counselling
relationship are increasing. CPs also report high levels of contact amongst their co-workers
feeling 86% of their colleagues have mental health issues. CPs also note contact is also high
within their family and friendships (78%). Over one third of CPs report they would willingly
disclose this information to their employer and almost three quarters feel their boss would be
supportive. However disclosing also has risks. A willingness to disclose mental health issues is
limited by the fear of discrimination and rejection. Clients are particularly reluctant to share their
experience with employers (62%) because “I would loose all credibility.” This reluctance may be
based on personal experience as less than 7% reports being treated fairly in the workplace. One
third of both CPs and service users (clients) say they would only disclose a mental illness “if they
had to”.
ACCEPTANCE IS A CRITICAL FACTOR
Feelings of safety and acceptance were identified as critical factors in a client‟s willingness to
disclose mental health issues. The more intimate the relationship (spouse, family, friend) the
greater the likelihood a person is to share this information. Eighty percent of clients reported they
would disclose mental health problems to their Career Practitioner. Although they are also less
than certain they would be accepted (68%). Disclosure is higher within this counselling context
because clients recognize that sharing this information is linked to accessing additional funding,
programmatic supports and because they see receiving accommodation as a legislated right. All
survey participants report being least likely to disclose mental health problems to workmates,
employers, and neighbours based on the potential risk of discrimination and rejection. Accessing
services in a small town or rural community, it is noted, presents a particular challenge where
service choice is limited CPs and mental health workers may be delivering services to their
family, friends, and/or neighbours. Concerns for privacy is limiting people‟s willingness to access
needed career and mental health counselling services.
CAREER PRACTITIONERS ARE NOT IMMUNE
Nearly half of CPs reports a personal experience with mental health problems (46%). This rate is
significantly higher than the population average of one in four. CPs also believe a very high
number of their colleagues may have a mental health problem (86%). Disclosure of personal
mental health issues by CPs to colleagues within their workplace is seen as risky. Workmates
are not always felt to be supportive. Observing incidents of discrimination towards clients with
mental health problems in the workplace is identified as a reason for maintaining secrecy and the

sting of insults and jokes is being personally felt. Self-stigma is negatively impacting self-efficacy,
a sense of personal entitlement and the willingness to pursuit of personal goals. In this survey
CPs who also live with a mental illness, and who are reluctant to disclose, are seen by peers to
act in more discriminatory ways with mental health clients. This is consistent with research
findings. Unresolved self-stigma may impact service quality given the high incidence of mental
health issues CPs report through this survey. Disclosure and engagement with peers through
peer support groups has been found to lessen the sting of stigma and serve as a protective
factor. Although clients value peer support not all CPs are knowledgeable about peer support or
know how to access it in their community.
AGREEMENT ON WHAT CLIENTS NEED
There is a high level of agreement amongst CPs on what they need to know in order to help
clients who have mental health problems. CPs unanimously agree that the stigma of mental
illness has a negative impact on work (99%), and that they need to know more about how to
recognize and reduce it. They need to better understand mental illnesses (99%), and develop
deeper knowledge of mental health treatment and when, where and how to access specialized
services (79%). They also need to learn more about peer support (97%) and where it is available
in the community. To be effective CPs acknowledge that they require specialized skills in
motivating clients (96%), and ways to enhanced work-related coaching skills specific to mental
illness. To open up new employment opportunities CPs also want information on how to assist
employers in supporting workers with mental health problems (94%), and strategies for
supporting recovery (89%). Helping mental health clients explore both the positive and negative
implications of disclosure is also identified as an important under developed skill.
CAREER PRACTITIONERS CURRENT KNOWLEDGE & SKILLS
CPs were asked to rate their current knowledge and skills regarding critical elements of the
counselling relationship, confidence in serving mental health clients and specific knowledge of
resources, rights, legal entitlements issues. Mental health clients were also asked to rank CPs on
their perceived knowledge of mental health/illness, ability to make appropriate referrals - including
linking people to peer support, their comfort in working with the mental health issues of their
clients, ability to invite disclosure and communicating accurate information about legal rights and
entitlements.
CPs clearly recognizes they are missing critical skills and knowledge they need to effectively
support mental health clients. And their clients would agree! Consistently, CPs self-rated more

positively then did their clients. On a number of parameters they both gave and received a failing
grade. Of significant importance is the discrepancy in referral to peer support. Given that
participating in peer support is positively correlated with reduced self-stigma and better recovery
outcomes this is important to address. Understanding and explaining legal rights, entitlements,
and exploring the risks and rewards of disclosure is essential in opening up opportunities and
accessing resources.
Assessment of knowledge & skills CPs self-rating Client rating CPs
Recommending peer support 88% 40%
Understanding mental health problems 81% 58%
Making the right referrals 81% 51%
Comfort discussing client’s mental health issues 57% 51%
Comfort working with mental health clients 57% 33%
Explaining rights & entitlements 55% 36%
Understanding legal rights 55% 33%
Discussing positive & negatives of disclosure 41% 66%
CPs do not feel a high degree of confidence or comfort in working with mental health clients and
clients appear to feel it. Half of mental health clients surveyed feel CPs do not have, and are not
sharing, tools for coping with work-based challenges (50%). Nor do they feel CPs have the
knowledge to help them with work related issues, or that they receive good support in accessing
work and training opportunities. In fact, 28% of mental health clients feel they are less likely to be
refered for training than clients who are not identified as having mental health issues.

DISCRIMINATION IS COMMON
Mental health clients (90%) and CPs (78%) agree that
discrimination is common in the workplace and within
counselling services. Disturbingly, less than 7% of
mental health clients feel they are treated fairly by
employers. Clients have a much higher perception of
discrimination than CPs reporting “It happens all the
time”. CPs see discrimination occurring less often
(48%). Some CPs feel that clients are too sensitive to
this issue “Quit being so paranoid”. Both CPs and clients identify similar examples of
discrimination as expressed through jokes, gossip, not being hired/ promoted/ fired, exclusion
from social events, work-related planning and decision-making activities, not being taken
seriously, name calling, bullying, and increased workload expectations
Clients specifically report feeling shunned, isolated, verbally and emotionally abused, that they
are facing negative judgments and the denial of benefits and sick days related to mental health
problems. Clients report experiencing lifelong discrimination leading to their hiding their illness,
suffering in silence, withdrawal and social isolation, and increased stress and sickness. However,
some mental health clients report that the experience of being discriminated against has actually
empowered them. This has led to taking on leadership roles in advocating for change, refusing to
give up, remaining motivated to succeed, and pushing against stereotypes.
WORK IMPROVES MENTAL HEALTH
On a positive note, CPs strongly endorse that work
improves mental health, and that people do not need to
be symptom free to engage in employment (89%).
Clients strongly agree (80%). CPs also do NOT think
people with mental health issues make less reliable
employees (86%). Most clients (79%) hold out hope
they will work. However, both groups agree that having
a mental health problem can make work more stressful and that having additional support is
beneficial. Some CPs also report the presence of positive policies of inclusion, including
preferential hiring practices and the protection of rights.
“Sometimes (stigma and
discrimination) is very apparent
and other times it is hidden but
lurking below the surface. I was
once told at a workplace that I
would advance no further in my
career because of my mental
illness.”

BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT
Both clients and CPs identify similar barriers in supporting a return to work. Stigma,
discrimination, and fear were by far the greatest identified barriers. A lack of understanding,
common myths of impulsivity, irrationality, and dangerousness leads to seeing people with mental
illness as different and ultimately to social distance and rejection. Both groups feel employers are
reluctant to hire people with mental health issues, and a lack an understanding of what
accommodations are required decreases motivation to
employ them. Mental health clients report that pessimism
by all counselling professionals (including mental health
professionals), negative judgments, a lack of empathy,
limited knowledge of mental illness and recovery concept,
and limited counselling skills make it hard to get the help
they need. CPs identify additional internal barriers for
clients including: symptoms of their mental illness;
decreased concentration and motivation; a lack of communication skills; and the loss of self
confidence. Some clients are also seen to lack insight, set unrealistic employment goals, are in
denial of their illness, and are treatment non-compliant. A small number of CPs noted a fear of
impulsivity and potential for violence as a barrier for their engagement with mental health clients.
CPs living with mental health issues note that the negative attitudes of their co-workers, the
perceptions that they are less competent, that they place a greater burden on others when
accommodations are required leads to them being ostracized and excluded from decision-making
and social aspects of work.
PEOPLE ARE FACING MULTIPLE CHALLENGES
CPs recognizes that some clients face multiple compounding challenges as both a cause and a
consequence of mental illness. This includes greater poverty, housing instability, loss of family
and social support, difficulties accessing childcare, transportation, poorer overall health,
addictions issues, legal issues and transportation barriers. This makes career planning much
more complex. Service protocols which limit amount of time and number of visits spent with
clients cobble the ability of CPs to provide the support needed. Structural barriers of the federal
and provincial disability programs limit the ability of clients to move into employment without
risking the loss of benefits and medication coverage.
Client life-impact of mental health problems?
• Decreases self confidence (100%)
• Interferes with employment & finances (97%)
• Reduces involvement in community (93%)
• Harms friendships & family relationships (86%)

CAREER PRACTITIONER RELATIONSHIP IS VERY IMPORTANT
Clients have a clear and consistent picture of the variables that are important to them in the
career practitioner relationship. They want to be given choices (91%) and feel confident that the
CP believes in their capacity for recovery (91%)
and that they inspire hope when people feel all
hope is lost (84%). Trust, feeling respected and
treated fairly is core. Given the stigma and
discrimination towards mental illness, people want
to be assured that their privacy will be respected,
that they will be listened to without judgment
(91%) and that there is a sense of care and
compassion (84%) in their relationship with the
CP. It is important to note that what clients most
want reflect attitudes, beliefs and behaviours and
not knowledge-based skills.
HOW TO BE HELPFUL
CPs and their clients share similar ideas of how to be helpful when mental health is an
employment factor. People want to feel respected and included in decision-making. Clients want
CPs to be aware of how mental illness impacts employment but to keep their focus on helping
them pursue their career goals, not provide mental health counselling. Both groups feel working
with employers to build acceptance is critical to creating opportunities for employment and
enhancing knowledge regarding what constitutes reasonable accommodation. Clients report their
accommodation needs are minimal and include: flexible hours to allow for appointments;
occasional adjustment in deadlines and work timetables; providing a less chaotic workspace
when required; educating managers and co-workers about mental illness; and creating positive
policy fostering inclusion.
We realized that we may have been
creating barriers for clients based on
our internal beliefs that present as
stigmatized and discriminatory
attitudes. It was both a shocking and
eye-opening discovery for us to
realize that the limiting factor in
our clients’ progress is our inability
to see a limitless future for every
client.
HAVE PATIENCE.... we will jump in when we are ready; just
offer the tools and services so that we can make an informed
decision. Do not force us. We have enough struggles already,
this has to be something that we do for ourselves...and we
will...trust me! :0)”

It is helpful if CPs learn more about available mental health resources and how to access them,
work collaboratively across service sectors to help build and strengthen support networks, and
help clients access supports - when they need it. Most importantly, clients want to be treated as
partners in the planning, and that CPs stay focused on their work needs and not their mental
health problems. Building hope, insight, confidence, self-esteem, and a positive vision for a
working future is essential to weathering the multiple challenges clients face. CPs needs to know
their limits and refer clients for mental health service when it is beneficial to the client. Many see
the policy practice of automatically referring clients who disclose a mental illness to specialized
mental health services as an example of systemic discrimination. However, 43% of mental health
clients report they would prefer to receive career planning services through specialized mental
health/disability services over mainstream services (23%) or peer support employment
counselling services (18%) – when the decision is theirs to make.
SATISFACTION / FRUSTRATION WORKING WITH CLIENTS
CPs report the areas of satisfaction in working with mental health clients is no different than with
all their clients: seeing progress, helping support change, gaining trust and assisting clients to
find and maintain employment. They are more satisfied when they can help clients achieve their
goals, see improvements in confidence and self esteem and watch them become more
connected with family, friends and within their community. An overarching and recurring theme
for CPs is the frustration of not having the knowledge or skills to support mental health clients.
They are worried that without this knowledge they
are likely to cause more harm than good. This
knowledge gap decreases their professional
confidence, makes them more tentative to help and
more likely to refer people to specialized disability
career services. Formal policies within some work
settings require automatically referring clients when mental illness is disclosed. This “passing off”
of clients creates frustration when CPs feel this is unnecessary, stigmatizing or when they feel
they can better handle the employment needs of these clients. Other CPs noted their willingness
to refer clients to specialized mental health/disability career-planning services depends on their
level of comfort and confidence in the quality of services they will receive. For some counsellors
the lack of client insight and motivation, cyclic nature of mental illness, difficult and challenging
behaviours and „unrealistic‟ career goals makes working with mental health clients stressful.
“Treat People Like People… Not a
Disorder” “Include us as partners in
planning”.

INADEQUATE SERVICES - LIMITED SUPPORT
Frustrations with the quality and accessibility of the mental health care system were a strongly
expressed concern. The lack of available mental health services, particularly in rural and smaller
communities, long wait times, insufficient resources and/or a lack of knowledge on how to access
services and when, makes it difficult for CP to counsel clients with complex, multifaceted needs.
Many CPs feel there is too much emphasis placed on medication and treatment compliance in
mental health services and not enough on providing psychological counselling and psychosocial
support. CPs feel clients are being discouraged by health practitioners and mental health care
professionals to pursue work and that mental health professionals are often too pessimistic about
their abilities or overly protective in encouraging employment. A focus on illness and disability
rather than wellness and competence undermines the confidence of clients and discourages
them from pursuing their career goals. The lack of knowledge about mental illness, treatment,
and available services is also felt to play a significant role in stigma and social exclusion. The
inability to access a consultation with a mental health professional, in a timely way, heightens a
sense of feeling lost, hopeless, and powerless and having little to offer to mental health clients.
CPs frequently mentioned the need for closer collaboration with mental health services. When
this is in place, people note, the overall quality of service and employability improves.
SEGREGATED VS MAINSTREAM SERVICES
In one regional session, there was considerable “push back” on the issue of specialized versus
mainstream services. In presenting the international research and „best practices‟ in addressing
stigma and discrimination the consultant used language of „segregated‟ versus „specialized‟
services. This touched a painful nerve amongst some professionals working in specialized
services. Segregation, it was felt, holds specific
historic meaning attached to racial segregation in
Nova Scotia. It was felt by some that this survey
was part of a provincial government strategy to
transform mental health services and raised fears
that their specialized disability services would lose
funding support. This was not the case. Some
specialized service staff feels they play a critical role because of the level of stigma and
discrimination clients face within mainstream services. They feel they provide a safe and
“The mental health resources in
my community are woefully
inadequate. This is why I am
uncomfortable trying to refer
them - often it is a dead-end for
clients.”

supportive environment that allows clients the opportunity to explore career planning without
judgment. Protests to suppress the survey‟s distribution were taken to the NSCDA Board along
with requests to change the language in all reports and presentations.
Within the context of this project, „segregation‟ refers to the lack of choice for mental health clients
in deciding which door they wish to use to access services. Fundamental to addressing
discrimination is recognizing that every citizen has the right to utilize publicly funded services. It
is the obligation of mainstream services to develop the skills they need to provide effective quality
service to people with mental illness. Mental health and disability specialist could play a role in
this education process.
CONSULTATION PROCESSES
The approach taken through this project was intended to build a common understanding on
stigma and discrimination, transform the attitudes and practices of Career Practitioners, build
partnerships and foster an agreement to take action. Using an iterative learning process each
project step helped to build knowledge. The results of the survey were presented through a
variety of regional, provincial, and national consultative processes to seek input, guidance and
confirm the veracity of the findings. This was done through:
1. Hosting five regional education and focus groups session across the province.
2. Presentation at Cannexus 2012 to a national and international audience.
3. Province-wide, multi-sector roundtable. Summary report distributed to stakeholders to
confirm agreement. (Appendix A)
4. Workshop at NSCDA‟s Hope Filled Approaches to Career Development conference.
Overall, there was a high level of agreement with the key findings of the survey, the identified
needs for training of CPs to enhance
their confidence, knowledge, and skills.
People shared their personal
experiences and specific examples of
behaviours, attitudes, policies and
practices that they felt were limiting.
Through the consultation processes
One of the early lessons I learned
formally at College, and informally on the
job, was that if you lived with a mental
illness or were having any personal issues
or crisis you never-never disclosed it….
This thinking and training forced me to
keep my own struggles a BIG FAT SECRET.

people were challenged to reflect on their own beliefs about mental illness and the values
attached to those who live with mental illness. This researcher was willing to disclose her
personal experience living with a mental illness and as a peer encourage participants to
challenge stereotypic ideas about “the mentally ill”. Kathy McKee, project manager, shared in the
consultations and presentation her own thoughts and how the project has transformed her ideas
of the role CPs can play in supporting clients. The inclusion of consumers as project advisors
and co-educators also helped bring an authenticity to the discussions. A Career Centre Manager
and front-line Career Counselor living with mental health challenges have made personal
submissions which explored the impact of the project on their thinking and feelings. (Appendix C)
Participants spoke candidly of their frustrations and concerns of not having the requisite skills or
access to needed community mental health services to successfully support this growing
segment of their client population. Government policies and funding models create challenges in
providing quality services when mental health is not part of a program‟s mandate.
IDENTIFIED TRAINING NEEDS
In Nova Scotia there is currently a lack of budget for professional development or funding for
workplace training to support new learning.
• Understanding stigma and ways to enhance social inclusion.
• Recognition and treatment of mental illness (with focus on employment).
• Knowledge of legal rights and obligations to accommodate.
• Managing disclosure and exploring positive and negative consequences related to work.
• Targeted assessment tools, motivation, and adult learning strategies.
• Mental health specific coaching and promoting recovery concepts.
• Knowledge of local mental health resources, access points, and referral processes.
• Peer support and its role in employment.
• Ways to support employers: addressing accommodation needs, support and coaching.
• Understanding labour market trends and opportunities.
• Promoting mentally healthy workplaces.
PREFERRED TRAINING APPROACHES
• Mental Health First Aid with an employment specific focus.
• Joint training with mental health professionals and community partners.
• Consumer-led workshops.
• Mentorships to support learning.

• Case studies based learning.
• Workplace seminars.
• Professional development workshops.
• Development of web/print materials for clients.
PROJECT TAKE AWAY MESSAGES
The findings from the survey and consultation are consistent with the research on stigma and
discrimination. The following represents emerging key messages:
 Mental health issues and their disclosure within the counselling context are increasing, and
are seen as a complicating factor within career practitioner‟s role.
 There is no “them” and “us”. Mental health problems are common, it is the lack of disclosure
which gives us a distorted view of who the „mentally ill‟ are.
 CPs are not immune from experiencing mental illness and face similar fears of
discriminations in the workplace should they disclose.
 CPs are a critical bridge to inclusion in the workforce and in accessing training and education
benefits. CPs are not always confident or comfortable in dealing with mental health clients or
feel skilled in providing appropriate support. Their clients would agree.
 There is a high level of agreement that stigma and discrimination are playing a significant
limiting role in the ability of people to reach their full potential Change will require that people
start with their own attitudes, beliefs and actions.
 Clients want to be seen as people not as a diagnosis and want CPs to focus on career
planning challenges.
 Accessing mainstream services is seen as a right. CPs working in mainstream services need
to be adequately trained and resourced to deliver quality service to all clients. Specialized
mental health vocational services have an important role to play - when inclusion is by
choice.
 One role is to help improve the knowledge and skills of the broader career practice
community. Integrating approaches may be an important direction to consider.
 The NSCDA is seen as a natural leader in developing educational tools. They are also seen
as a potential advocate for better funding and accessibility to mental health services with

government. Working collaboratively, across disciplines and service sectors will improve the
quality of services.
 CPs can also play a meaningful role in
addressing stigma in the broader
community by promoting positive profiles
of client successes including within the
media. This also includes addressing
program barriers and policies that limit
client opportunities.
RECOMMENDATIONS TO NSCDA
Multiple „Charting the Course‟ consultations,
across many stakeholder groups, confirm a high level of agreement on the importance of the
project‟s goals and objectives. Counsellors report they do not feel they have the knowledge and
skills they need to serve this client population effectively. Stigma and discrimination is seen as a
major barrier and it is felt that a collaborative multi-sector approach to address this challenge is
required to enhance employment-related social inclusion.
There is a broad-based desire amongst stakeholders for the NSCDA to continue its leadership
role in addressing the knowledge and skill gaps CPs identified in working with their clients. CPs
are looking to the NSCDA to develop professional educational and training tools, using webinars,
conferences, workshops, and toolkits to improve their knowledge and counselling skills in
addressing the mental health, employment and training needs of their clients. As a recognized
leader in the employment-counselling field, stakeholders would like to see the NSCDA play an
advocacy role by:
1) Encouraging better coordination between mental health and career services;
2) Partnering with consumers in developing training tools;
3) Advocating for improved mapping, availability and access to mental health supports and
services; and
4) Addressing with government program polices and funding practices which impede access to
training and employment services for people living with mental health issues.
“Have your people not be therapists...but
be knowledgeable about the clients they
are trying to help integrate back into
society. We want to be part of the
workforce but may only dip our toes in and
then back away, come back and test the
water again...several times before we are
really ready.

There is also a recognized need to identify strategies and educational tools to engage and
support employers in hiring people with mental health issues and for best practice guidance on
how to successfully accommodate people in the workplace. CERIC has confirmed that the issues
identified through this research have broad national implications. The NSCDA can take a leading
role in developing educational resources and tools which can be shared more broadly though
provincial and national networks. Nova Scotia career practitioners have voluntarily agreed to
adopt National Guidelines for Career Practitioners as their practice model. Included within these
guidelines are standards on diversity and inclusion. NSCDA can encourage the expansion of
these guidelines to provide direction on mental health-related issues to make operational „best
practices‟ on mental health, stigma and social inclusion through career counselling.
AGREED NEXT STEPS:
The Board of Directors of the NSCDA reviewed and approved moving forward on Phase Two of
the Charting the Course Project to fulfill the recommendation emerging from this study. At their
October 2012 meeting they approved the following actions:
Engage Neasa Martin, project researcher to develop a proposal for training tools to be
delivered in partnership with NSCDA.
Seek funding from CERIC to develop resources with NSCDA as the sponsoring
agency.
Identify funding opportunities from foundations / government for hosting a mental
health and employment conference.
Create a mental health knowledge stream into NSCDA Annual Conference.

PROJECT CHALLENGES
1) SURVEY MONKEY TOOL:
The use of Survey Monkey presented significant and unanticipated challenges. Due to Privacy
Laws in Nova Scotia, the servers of Universities and Colleges, Government Departments and
Hospitals would not support dissemination of the project survey. Because Survey Monkey is an
American survey tool, and data is stored on US servers, results are potentially subject to review
by Homeland Security under the Patriot Act. Alternative ways to access the survey were created
but this barrier may have influenced participation levels of stakeholders from these sectors.
There are documented cases of Canadians being denied entry into the United States based on
their history of mental illness, use of 911 emergency services, and/ or taking psychotropic
medications. Although the survey was anonymous, the unique IP addresses for each participant
could potentially be used to identify participants. Although the risk may be very low it is ill-
advised to use this survey tool for research involving clients with mental health and addictions
issues. A Canadian tool “Fluid Survey” provides flexibility and greater privacy protection.
2) TIMELINES SET WERE TOO AGGRESSIVE
Because of the challenges associated with the survey dissemination, we were only able to
present partial results at the scheduled roundtable meetings. It also took longer than anticipated
to engage the Advisory Committee and have adequate time to effectively engage them in
planning and review processes. It would also have been beneficial to meet with the Advisory
Committee to undertake a more detailed review of the findings and flesh out the
recommendations based on their localized knowledge and networks. However, the schedule was
created to align with pre-existing meetings and conference opportunities, which helped to
increase visibility and reduce project costs.
3) PROMOTING CHANGE CAN PROVOKE RESISTANCE
A summary of emerging research and expert advice on addressing stigma and discrimination in
mental health was presented to the province-wide roundtables. This information contradicted
prevailing orthodoxy and challenged people to reconsider current approaches to public education
and client care. Research presented on the prevalence of stigma in mental health services and
the international movement toward social inclusion by improving access to mainstream vs
specialized services provoked angry responses in one roundtable meeting. This led to
questioning the survey methodology and the veracity of findings. These challenges were offset
when consumers could share their experience and confirm the veracity of the research and

personal experiences. However, the absence of a strong „consumer voice‟ in one session made it
more challenging to respond to these criticisms. Protests from specialized disability career
counselling services placed pressure on the NSCDA Board of Directors to influence the survey
findings and to request a change in the language used. Having additional time would have
allowed for deeper engagement of this sector to build understanding and consensus. Having
robust consumer involvement in other sessions was very important in creating context and
exploring these sensitive areas.
4) ENGAGEMENT OF PARTNERS
The mental health sector was not as actively engaged in this project as hoped. The reason given
was the lack of human resources to commit to projects outside of core organizational activities.
The under funding of mental health services in Nova Scotia was a frequently noted barrier to
accessing supports and this extended into participation in this project.
PROJECT LESSONS LEARNED
This project was able to achieve a high degree of success because:
• The issue of stigma and discrimination has received greater visibility and prominence as an
issue of concern making this a timely project of interest to the community.
• The Government of Nova Scotia is currently undertaking a strategic transformation of mental
health and addictions services and addressing stigma and discrimination is a stated priority.
The NSCDA was the perfect project sponsor:
• NSCDA‟s involvement enhanced the credibility of the project and fostered positive
engagement.
• NSCDA holds a leadership role in enhancing the training and support of CPs and in
promoting client-centred practice.
• Recommendations emanating from this consultation can be „operationalized‟ through the
NSCDA, making participation more meaningful.
• The timing of this project corresponds with the development of National Guidelines for Career
Practitioners, creating an opportunity for direct application of findings.
On-the-ground support was critical:

• Kathy McKee‟s knowledge of local and regional networks was invaluable to the project‟s
success. Her ability to mobilize her positive working relationships with province-wide Job
Resource Centre Managers helped legitimize the project, to foster inclusion and coordinate
consultations.
• The enthusiasm and support of Kathy‟s staff and their willingness to draw on personal
experiences added an important dimension to understanding stigma and discrimination from
the CP‟s perspective.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Projects like this require the support, encouragement, and enthusiasm of many people to be
successful. This project benefited considerably from many people:
 Special thanks goes to CERIC, our project funder who made this project possible. In
particular, thanks to Riz Ibrahim for his ongoing trust, support, and wisdom.
 Thanks to the Board of Directors of the NSCDA for taking a leap of faith in sponsoring this
project, for accepting an „outsider‟ into the fold and for providing ongoing advice.
 My heartfelt gratitude goes out to the members of the Project Advisory Committee for their
patience, insights, and responsiveness. Thank you Andy Cox, Pam Halverson, Roy
Muise, Betsy Paine, and Lori Robitaille. It is with sadness that we acknowledge the
passing of Marc Porter who added invaluable insights from a business and employment
perspective. You are missed!
 Colossal thanks to Kathy McKee, for her amazing project management skills, sound
knowledge of career practices, extensive networks and unfailing good judgment, courage
and humour.
 Huge thanks also to the staff of the Windsor Job Resource Centre, particularly Francesco
Trolli for his creative and technical talents in developing the project website and Janice
Langille for her ongoing support, enthusiasm for the project and unique insights.
 Many thanks to the champions of the regional roundtables including Janice Langille,
Amanda White, Marilyn Ruelland, and Barbara Buchanan.
 Thanks to the Career Resource Centres Managers Group. A special note of thanks goes
out to Margo Hudson for her creative ideas and passion for enhancing client services.
 Huge thanks to the Self Help Connection particularly Roy Muise - an inspiration to us all!
Thanks to Linda Bayers for her wisdom and Beth Carmichael who adeptly filled in for Roy
Muise at the provincial roundtable and presentation.
 Most importantly, thanks to all of the career practitioners, mental health professionals, and
service users who participated in the survey. Your honesty in talking about a topic too
often kept secret made this study possible. I hope I was able to accurately capture your
experiences, needs and hopes for the future.

REFERENCES & NOTES
i
Kirsh, B. (2000). Work, Workers, and Workplaces: A Qualitative Analysis of Narratives of
Mental Health Consumers Journal of Rehabilitation, Oct-Dec, 2000
ii
Out of the Shadows at Last: Transforming Mental Health, Mental Illness and Addiction Services
in Canada (Literature review, expert advise, online consultations and public hearings).
iii
Wilton, R. D. (2003). Poverty and mental health: A qualitative study of residential care facility
tenants. Community mental health journal, 39(2), 139–156.
iv
Marwaha, S., & Johnson, S. (2004). Schizophrenia and employment - a review. Social
Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 39(5), 337-349. doi:10.1007/s00127-004-0762-4
v
Martin, N., Johnston, V. Time For Change: Tackling Stigma and Discrimination Sept. 2007.
(Literature review, expert consultations, on-line stakeholder consultations.
vi
Stephens, T., & Joubert, N. (2001). The economic burden of mental health problems in Canada.
Chronic Diseases in Canada 22(1). Updated link retrieved August 16, 2005 from http://www.phac-
aspc.gc.ca/publicat/cdic-mcc/22-1/d_e.html
vii
The use of Survey Monkey created serious concerns in accessing government, hospital,
university and college staff. Because it is an American survey tool, its contents are subject to
review by Homeland Security Service under the Patriot Act. This is explored further in „lessons
learned‟.

APPENDIX A
Roundtable Strategic Meeting
Summary Report
May 30, 2012
Holiday Inn, Dartmouth
The purpose of this provincial roundtable was to invite diverse stakeholders with an interest in
mental health together to review the findings of the Charting the Course project. We looked at
identified gaps, needs, potential policies, practices and resources required to strengthen the
capacity of career counsellors to meet the needs of clients with mental health issues. Change
requires leadership and through our discussions with key influencers and decision-makers, we
hope to map a course forward for career practitioners and build commitment for ongoing
implementation of these recommendations.
Questions asked:
1. What needs to be done?
2. Who needs to take action?
3. What are the next steps?
Training – What is needed?
· Ongoing mentorships needed
· Mental health first aid
· Training with employers – lunch and learns
· Basic sensitivity training for all – current mental health vs situationally induced
· Understanding use of resources and making appropriate referrals
· Tying this work into competencies and guidelines
· Assessment and techniques – broader general knowledge
· Share best practices
· Get experience and work with consumers
· Positive psychology
· Train locally maybe through webinars
Recurring Themes
Get Mental Health on the table….

 Policy is a problem – if agencies don’t have mental health in their mandate or contract it
is difficult to access staff training
 Build a business case that shows a need to invest in training - there are social health
consequences of not attending to or being sensitive to this issue
 Careers NS – timely to bring this to government for Career Practitioners
 Our communities calls us to task on this issue – it is a societal issue affecting everyone
Collaboration is key…
 Must have knowledge of what other agencies do
 Hands on experience – go to other agencies and really know what they do
 Knowledge of local resources
 Need to collaborate to strengthen the voice
 Need resource mapping of areas (not available everywhere)
Personal responsibility to make change…
 Help clients feel safe to disclose
 Begins with individual – attitudes, values and beliefs
 Responsibility to know and be comfortable with other community resources
 When focusing on the client – the system changes
 What am I doing today to make a difference?
 Get rid of us vs them in our own NS Career Practitioner world
 Take advantage of what is already available – make it a goal
 We need to be comfortable with each other and then will be better equipped to share with
clients
Program delivery…
 Programs don’t always match need – connection between realities – be part of the
process
 Working with government to make sure connections are more fluid
 Partners working together as one voice
 Hold government accountable for their funding envelopes – if it isn’t right let’s work
together provincially to make it right
 Government funding separates services – can we do this better?
 Peer support part of mainstream – embed it – get personal contact
 Discussions across agencies and expertise is the beginning of how we can transform our
work
 Transparency on what we do and what we have to offer
 Need to map out resources
 Our current systems can be exhausting to clients

 Front line workers feel that they are working at cross purposes with those designing the
programs
 Assessments – need money for those
 Value for specialized services
What can the NSCDA do?
 Professional development – conference or PD days - leadership
 Mentorship and collaboration – facilitate groups getting together
 Consider different types of learning and learners
 Help develop support for employers. Inform and educate.
 NSCDA – messages to government – sharing the difficulty of fitting people into boxes
 Should be the lead on this initiative for the development of the skills of Career
Practitioners

APPENDIX B
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NSCDA
Submitted to NSCDA Board
Monday, October 22, 2012
Recommendations Overview:
Multiple ‘Charting the Course’ project consultations, across multiple stakeholder groups, confirm a
high level of agreement on the importance of the project’s goals and objectives (See summary
report below). Mental health issues and their disclosure within the counselling context are
increasing, are seen as a complicating factor within career practitioners role, counsellors do not
feel they have the knowledge and skills they need to serve clients with mental health problems
effectively, stigma and discrimination is seen as a major barrier and it is felt that a collaborative
multi-sector approach to address this challenge is required to enhance employment-related social
inclusion.
There is a broad-based desire amongst stakeholders for the NSCDA to continue its leadership
role in addressing the knowledge and skill gaps identified by career practitioners in working with
their clients. Career practitioners are looking to the NSCDA to develop professional educational
and training tools, through the use of webinars, conferences, workshops, and toolkits to improve
their knowledge and counselling skills in addressing the mental health, employment and training
needs of their clients. Through this research career practitioners also disclosed that they are not
immune to mental health issues and identifying ways to minimize stigma within the workplace is
an identified concern. As a recognized leader in the employment counselling field, stakeholders
would also like to see the NSCDA play an advocacy role by: 1) encouraging better coordination
between mental health and career services; 2) partnering with peer support programs in
developing training; 3) advocating for improved mapping, availability and access to mental health
supports and services; and 4) addressing with government program polices and funding practices
which impede access to training and employment services for people living with mental health
issues. There is also a recognized need to identify strategies and educational tools to engage
and support employers in hiring people with mental health issues and for best practice guidance
on how to successfully accommodate people in the workplace.

CERIC has confirmed that the issues identified through this research have broad national
implications. The NSCDA can take a leading role in developing educational resources and tools,
which can be, shared more broadly though provincial and national networks. Nova Scotia career
practitioners have voluntarily agreed to adopt National Guidelines for Career Practitioners as their
practice model. Included within these guidelines are standards on diversity and inclusion.
NSCDA can advocate for the expansion of these guidelines to provide direction on mental health-
related issues to make operational ‘best practices’ on mental health, stigma and social inclusion
through career counselling.
Recommended next steps:
1) NSCDA endorse the recommendations for action:
 Engage Neasa Martin to develop a proposal for training tools to be delivered in partnership
with NSCDA.
 Seek funding from CERIC to develop resources with NSCDA as the sponsoring agency.
 Identify funding opportunities from foundations / government for hosting a mental health
and employment conference.
2) Create a mental health knowledge stream into NSCDA Annual Conference.
3) NSCDA develop a policy position statement and key messaging tools aligned with project
findings.
4) NSCDA support the engagement of government partners and community stakeholders to
achieve advocacy objectives.

APPENDIX C
DISCLOSURE IS KEY – Project Notes From a Front-line Career Practitioner
I am formally trained in mental health and community services counselling. I have worked for over
20 years in the helping professions. My experience has been both paid and as a volunteer. I have
always been active in the community to make positive change and provide supports for those in
crisis. As an outspoken advocate for marginalized persons and those without family or community
support has earned me a reputation for being a maverick, or depending on who you speak with, a
trouble maker.
One of the early lessons I learned formally at College, and informally on the job, was that if you
lived with a mental illness or were having any personal issues or crisis you never-never
disclosed it. The message was if you identified with or disclosed that you have any sort of mental
health issue that you at the very least your motives were suspect, at worst you were incompetent
and would likely cause more harm to your clients than you could ever help.
This thinking and training forced me to keep my own struggles a BIG FAT SECRET. I have
chronic and severe anxiety and depression. My anxiety is managed by the RIGHT medication,
and the symptoms have lessened as I grow older and am less worried about others opinions
which bring me to the point of why I am writing this narrative.
Last year during the workshop on career practitioners and mental health put on by Neasa Martin,
(who I admire greatly and who I think is brilliant and a consummate professional) disclosed that
she has a mental illness. She did not qualify it, explain it, or try to soften it by using terms such
as slight, minimal, or not severe. Many of us in the room, employment counsellors for the most
part, (some) were shocked and all were surprised that Neasa would admit to a group of her peers
that she has a mental illness. „ Oh no‟, I thought, „the death knell to counsellors.” Statistically
about 20% of Canadians have had or are living with a mental illness. I find that interesting.
Clinical wisdom would have us believe that, „people who choose these fields are trying to figure
out our own messed up lives or head.” That being the case then 20% stat may be much higher in
the helping professions.
Long story short, I have since felt an enormous sense of relief about not having to hide my own
life long struggles, that I was a mental health consumer, needed community supports and

services and that I wasn‟t born with a master degree in counselling because I am truly an altruist.
I don‟t know if this was the sole reason I choose the helping profession, but I do know that I still
seek answers to troubling issues for my clients, friends and yes myself. My desire to help and my
personal experiences have helped me to become very good at helping others in need of support
or counsel. I now disclose openly, if appropriate that I have chronic anxiety, that I have been
unemployed, have needed help and support at various times in my life. My clients in turn are
sometimes shocked and surprised, but I sense that mostly they are grateful that I meet them on a
level playing field and it‟s not an “us and them” situation. It‟s all of us together to live the best
lives that we possibly can.
THE NEW NORMAL – Notes From a Career Resource Centre Manager
Prior to my engagement in the Charting the Course project, I was certain that I approached my
interactions with clients and the public from a helpful pedestal. I was “normal,” caring and
grounded in my work and provided common sense advice to staff and clients about how they
could move forward in their careers and lives. It was a joy to see successes and to share these
with fellow practitioners when hard work paid off. There were inevitable setbacks and challenges;
sometimes clients were annoying, sometimes they didn‟t follow a proscribed path, and sometimes
they just seemed crazy. Last year it began to seem like everyone was a little “off” – 80% of our
clients were reporting mental health problems, practitioners were now presenting with mental
health issues (how was this possible??) and the mood of the workplace was undergoing a
change.
Our discussions with clients seemed to focus on deficiencies – the clients were deficient in that
they weren‟t prepared for or didn‟t accept help, and we were deficient in that we didn‟t have to the
tools address client needs, and even questioned whether clients with mental health challenges
even belonged in our centres. Wasn‟t there someone else who could deal with them? We didn‟t
feel that we were qualified and because this work is hard enough as it is, the additional layer of
mental health concerns made us want to shed these clients as soon as possible.
Fortunately, we met Neasa Martin and heard a different story about the world and the people in it.
Mental health challenges are not just experienced by “others” but by all of us, career practitioners

included. In fact, the research shows that career practitioners have disclosed as having mental
health challenges at a much higher rate than in the general population. We realized that we may
have been creating barriers for clients based on our internal beliefs that present as stigmatized
and discriminatory attitudes. It was both a shocking and eye-opening discovery for us to realize
that the limiting factor in our clients‟ progress is our inability to see a limitless future for every
client.
So, what is normal? I have discovered that there isn‟t one. There isn‟t a magical line or single
definition that enables us to categorize individuals and our services for them. We are all in this
together. I am now certain that everyone is doing the best they can on any given day. And I no
longer stand on my „normal‟ pedestal, confident that in this helping profession I have all of the
answers. We are all a work in progress. Thanks for the opportunity to examine this issue, I
believe it has changed the lives of many people in our province.

Charting the Course: Mapping the Career Practitioners Role in Supporting People with Mental Health Challenges. course project final report

More Related Content

What's hot (12)

Similar to Charting the Course: Mapping the Career Practitioners Role in Supporting People with Mental Health Challenges. course project final report (20)

More from Mental Health Commission of Canada (9)

Recently uploaded (20)

Charting the Course: Mapping the Career Practitioners Role in Supporting People with Mental Health Challenges. course project final report