2
Most read
5
Most read
10
Most read
The CIRO Model of
Management Training
 An overview of the CIRO Model for evaluating
management training programs.
Introduction to the CIRO
Model
 • The CIRO model is a structured approach to evaluating
management training.
 • Developed by Warr, Bird, and Rackham in 1970.
 • Focuses on four key stages: Context, Input, Reaction,
and Output.
 • Provides a framework to assess training effectiveness.
CIRO Model Overview
 Diagram: A simple flowchart showing Context Input
→ →
Reaction Output.
→
Importance of the CIRO Model
 • Helps systematically evaluate training effectiveness.
 • Identifies strengths and areas for improvement.
 • Aligns training with organizational goals and employee
needs.
Breakdown of the CIRO Model
 1. Context Evaluation
 • Assesses organizational and individual needs.
 • Identifies skill gaps and deficiencies.
 2. Input Evaluation
 • Evaluates training design and delivery.
 • Includes trainers, materials, and methods.
 3. Reaction Evaluation
 • Measures participants’ reactions.
 • Uses surveys and discussions.
 4. Outcome Evaluation
 • Assesses training impact.
 • Uses performance assessments and KPIs.
CIRO Model vs. Kirkpatrick
Model
 • CIRO Model focuses on needs assessment and
structured evaluation.
 • Kirkpatrick Model emphasizes reaction, learning,
behavior, and results.
 • CIRO is more suited for management training,
Kirkpatrick is broader.
Advantages of the CIRO Model
 • Provides a holistic view of training effectiveness.
 • Focuses on pre- and post-training assessment.
 • Aligns training with strategic goals.
Limitations of the CIRO Model
 • Can be time-consuming due to extensive evaluation.
 • Requires proper implementation and skilled
evaluators.
 • Does not focus deeply on individual learning
improvements.
Implementing the CIRO Model
 Step 1: Conduct a thorough needs analysis (Context
Evaluation).
 Step 2: Design an effective training program (Input
Evaluation).
 Step 3: Gather immediate feedback from trainees
(Reaction Evaluation).
 Step 4: Assess post-training improvements (Outcome
Evaluation).
Conclusion
 • The CIRO model is a valuable tool for evaluating
training effectiveness.
 • Ensures training aligns with business objectives.
 • Helps improve training ROI through structured
evaluation.
Q&A
 Open floor for questions and discussions.

More Related Content

PPTX
EVALUATING HRD PROGRAMS AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
PPTX
Training Evaluation methods for employee training
PPTX
Ciro approach
PPTX
Training Evaluation
PPTX
Training evaluation models
PPTX
Training Evaluation
PPTX
Training Evaluation Model.pptx
PPTX
C&M day 5
EVALUATING HRD PROGRAMS AND CAREER MANAGEMENT
Training Evaluation methods for employee training
Ciro approach
Training Evaluation
Training evaluation models
Training Evaluation
Training Evaluation Model.pptx
C&M day 5

Similar to CIRO model in training and development (20)

PPTX
Training evaluation
PPTX
Chapter 008 Strategic Training.pptx
PPTX
Unit_2_Training_in_Process.pptx for anal
PPTX
Unit_2_Training_in_Process of developmen
PPTX
Training effectiveness
PPTX
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
PDF
Unit 5- training evalutaion pptx
PPT
Evaluation of training Program
PPT
HRM - UNIT-3 notes BBA Osmania University
PPT
Lecture 19-20.ppt
PPT
Hrm unit-iii
PPSX
Training evaluation
PDF
Measuring Learning Impact
PPTX
Overview of the SAT Process
PPTX
CHAPTER 2Hrm ttyssshhbjugggfddwwtuuygg.pptx
PPTX
Curriculum evaluation models
PPTX
Curriculum evaluation model
PPTX
Kirkpatricks Foul Levels Evaluation.pptx
PPTX
chapter 5 staffing management PART II.pptx
PDF
Phillips model training for evaluation pdf
Training evaluation
Chapter 008 Strategic Training.pptx
Unit_2_Training_in_Process.pptx for anal
Unit_2_Training_in_Process of developmen
Training effectiveness
G.training evaluation by jyoti k
Unit 5- training evalutaion pptx
Evaluation of training Program
HRM - UNIT-3 notes BBA Osmania University
Lecture 19-20.ppt
Hrm unit-iii
Training evaluation
Measuring Learning Impact
Overview of the SAT Process
CHAPTER 2Hrm ttyssshhbjugggfddwwtuuygg.pptx
Curriculum evaluation models
Curriculum evaluation model
Kirkpatricks Foul Levels Evaluation.pptx
chapter 5 staffing management PART II.pptx
Phillips model training for evaluation pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Susan Semmelmann: Enriching the Lives of others through her Talents and Bless...
PDF
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
PDF
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Aug 2025.pdf
PDF
Robin Fischer: A Visionary Leader Making a Difference in Healthcare, One Day ...
PDF
PMB 401-Identification-of-Potential-Biotechnological-Products.pdf
PDF
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
PPTX
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
PDF
Introduction to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
PDF
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)
DOCX
Handbook of Entrepreneurship- Chapter 5: Identifying business opportunity.docx
PPTX
basic introduction to research chapter 1.pptx
PPTX
Project Management_ SMART Projects Class.pptx
PPTX
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
PPT
Lecture notes on Business Research Methods
PDF
TyAnn Osborn: A Visionary Leader Shaping Corporate Workforce Dynamics
DOCX
Center Enamel Powering Innovation and Resilience in the Italian Chemical Indu...
PDF
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
PDF
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
DOCX
FINALS-BSHhchcuvivicucucucucM-Centro.docx
Susan Semmelmann: Enriching the Lives of others through her Talents and Bless...
Solaris Resources Presentation - Corporate August 2025.pdf
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Aug 2025.pdf
Robin Fischer: A Visionary Leader Making a Difference in Healthcare, One Day ...
PMB 401-Identification-of-Potential-Biotechnological-Products.pdf
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
Board-Reporting-Package-by-Umbrex-5-23-23.pptx
Introduction to Generative Engine Optimization (GEO)
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
Environmental Law Communication: Strategies for Advocacy (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Handbook of Entrepreneurship- Chapter 5: Identifying business opportunity.docx
basic introduction to research chapter 1.pptx
Project Management_ SMART Projects Class.pptx
BUSINESS CYCLE_INFLATION AND UNEMPLOYMENT.pptx
Lecture notes on Business Research Methods
TyAnn Osborn: A Visionary Leader Shaping Corporate Workforce Dynamics
Center Enamel Powering Innovation and Resilience in the Italian Chemical Indu...
Daniels 2024 Inclusive, Sustainable Development
#1 Safe and Secure Verified Cash App Accounts for Purchase.pdf
FINALS-BSHhchcuvivicucucucucM-Centro.docx
Ad

CIRO model in training and development

  • 1. The CIRO Model of Management Training  An overview of the CIRO Model for evaluating management training programs.
  • 2. Introduction to the CIRO Model  • The CIRO model is a structured approach to evaluating management training.  • Developed by Warr, Bird, and Rackham in 1970.  • Focuses on four key stages: Context, Input, Reaction, and Output.  • Provides a framework to assess training effectiveness.
  • 3. CIRO Model Overview  Diagram: A simple flowchart showing Context Input → → Reaction Output. →
  • 4. Importance of the CIRO Model  • Helps systematically evaluate training effectiveness.  • Identifies strengths and areas for improvement.  • Aligns training with organizational goals and employee needs.
  • 5. Breakdown of the CIRO Model  1. Context Evaluation  • Assesses organizational and individual needs.  • Identifies skill gaps and deficiencies.  2. Input Evaluation  • Evaluates training design and delivery.  • Includes trainers, materials, and methods.  3. Reaction Evaluation  • Measures participants’ reactions.  • Uses surveys and discussions.  4. Outcome Evaluation  • Assesses training impact.  • Uses performance assessments and KPIs.
  • 6. CIRO Model vs. Kirkpatrick Model  • CIRO Model focuses on needs assessment and structured evaluation.  • Kirkpatrick Model emphasizes reaction, learning, behavior, and results.  • CIRO is more suited for management training, Kirkpatrick is broader.
  • 7. Advantages of the CIRO Model  • Provides a holistic view of training effectiveness.  • Focuses on pre- and post-training assessment.  • Aligns training with strategic goals.
  • 8. Limitations of the CIRO Model  • Can be time-consuming due to extensive evaluation.  • Requires proper implementation and skilled evaluators.  • Does not focus deeply on individual learning improvements.
  • 9. Implementing the CIRO Model  Step 1: Conduct a thorough needs analysis (Context Evaluation).  Step 2: Design an effective training program (Input Evaluation).  Step 3: Gather immediate feedback from trainees (Reaction Evaluation).  Step 4: Assess post-training improvements (Outcome Evaluation).
  • 10. Conclusion  • The CIRO model is a valuable tool for evaluating training effectiveness.  • Ensures training aligns with business objectives.  • Helps improve training ROI through structured evaluation.
  • 11. Q&A  Open floor for questions and discussions.