CISC-603 DSL Design Methodology Evaluation Rubric.docxDSL Desi.docx
- 1. CISC-603 DSL Design Methodology Evaluation Rubric.docx DSL Design Methodology Evaluation Rubric Course: CISC 603 Theory of Computation Instructor: Chad Van Chu Date: / / Student Name: Methodology Evaluation Question Clear and concise problem stated that is testable. Identifies the question in an unclear manner, but is still testable. Identifies only part of the question, but is still testable No clear and concise problem stated . 2 Review of Literatures You have to find at least 4 related journal/conference articles from e.g., IEEE, ACM, or any referred journal or conference publication related to your selected domain. Evidence of 4 Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less 2 Hypothesis Follows “if…then… because” format. Is related to the question. Clearly defines controls vs. variables Predicts with correct facts. Evidence of 4 Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less 2 Material Dataset, Codes, Scripts, etc.
- 2. Lists all materials Lists some materials Lists some of the materials Body of Methodology Data Mining project’s objectives, tasks, and steps. Lists all in a sequential order that are not easily followed. Provides diagrams of all set ups. Lists all steps in a sequential order that are not easily followed. . Provides some diagrams of set ups. Lists steps in an order that are not sequential, not easily followed, or incomplete. Provides some diagrams of set ups. 2 Results All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. All visible observations are provided. Complete and correct analysis of data is provided. Errors of Experimentation are provided. All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. All visible observations are provided. Analysis of data is provided with a few errors. Errors of experimentation are provided. All data is recorded and organized in a clear manner. Visible observations are missing. Analysis of data is provided with a few errors. Errors of experimentation are provided. Incorrect data is provided regardless of inclusion or presentation of all other criteria. 2 Conclusion Restates the hypothesis, supports or refutes it and explains the
- 3. role of the test in making the decision Restates the hypothesis and supports or refutes it Supports or refutes the hypothesis without restating it Does not address the hypothesis 2 Clarity of Topic Includes a clear title which gives specific information about main topic. Includes a title which gives information about the main topic. Includes a title that gives some information about the main topic. Missing a title or statement of the main topic. 2 Details of Research Includes all details from research and has clear labels, phrases, or sentence descriptions. Includes most details from research and has clear labels or phrases. Includes some details from research and has labels or phrases. Includes only a few details from research using labels or phrases. 2 Effectiveness Viewer has a thorough understanding of topic researched. Backboard includes specific examples and/or illustrations in an organized manner. Viewer has an understanding of the topic researched. Backboard includes examples and /or illustrations. Viewer has some understanding of the topic researched. Backboard includes some examples and/or illustrations. Viewer has difficulty understanding topic researched. Backboard includes few examples and/or illustrations. 2 Quality Includes illustrations and labels. Content is edited for spelling
- 4. and punctuation and has no errors. Includes illustrations and labels. Content is edited for spelling and punctuation and has less than 3 errors. Includes illustrations and labels. Content is not edited for spelling and punctuation and has more than 3 errors. Does not include illustrations and labels and/or contains more than 3 errors in spelling and punctuation. 2 CISC-603 Research White Paper Presentation Evaluation Rubric.docx Research White Paper al Presentation Rubric Course: CISC 603 Theory of Computation Instructor: Chad Van Chu Date: / / Student Name: Oral Presentation Language Use and Delivery The student communicates ideas effectively volume and pace. e. grammar.
- 5. appropriate for context and uses correct grammar. different portions. rrect grammar. grammar. 2.5 Organization and Preparation The student exhibits logical organization. topic. ant conclusion. some transitions to connect key points.
- 6. focus on the topic. conclusion. 2.5 Content The student explains the process and findings of the project and the resulting learning. relevant and accurate evidence multiple and varied sources stretch. esis. thesis. stretch.
- 7. e thesis with evidence. stretch. 2.5 Questions and Answers Demonstrates extensive knowledge of the topic by responding confidently, precisely and appropriately to all audience questions and feedback. Demonstrates knowledge of the topic by responding accurately and appropriately to questions and feedback. Demonstrates some knowledge of the topic by responding accurately and appropriately to questions and feedback. Demonstrates incomplete knowledge of the topic by responding inaccurately and inappropriately to questions and feedback. 2.5 CISC-603 Research White Paper Writing Evaluation Rubric.docx Research White Paper Writing Evaluation Rubric Course: CISC 603 Theory of Computation Instructor: Chad Van Chu Date: / / Student Name: Paper Writing Evaluation Category Exceeds Standard Meets Standard Nearly Meets Standard Does Not Meet Standard
- 8. Score Title Page Title, Your Name, Instructor’s Name, Course Period, Date, Neatly finished-no errors Evidence of 4 Evidence of 3 Evidence of 2 or less 1 Statement Clearly and concisely states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence, which is engaging, and thought provoking. Clearly states the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. States the paper’s purpose in a single sentence. Incomplete and/or unfocused. 1 Introduction The introduction is engaging, states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. The introduction states the main topic and previews the structure of the paper. The introduction states the main topic but does not adequately preview the structure of the paper. No clear introduction or main topic 2 Body Each paragraph has thoughtful supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. Each paragraph has sufficient supporting detail sentences that develop the main idea. Each paragraph lacks supporting detail sentences. Fails to develop the main idea. 2 Contents All required information is discerned with clarity and precision and contains all items listed in Meets category Contains: application, abstract, research paper, lab report,
- 9. observation log, reflective essay, guide and rubrics. Contains 5 – 6 of criteria for meets; and /or poorly organized Contains less than 5 criteria for meets. 2 Mechanics No errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. No errors sentence structure and word usage. Almost no errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Almost no errors in sentence structure and word usage. Many errors in punctuation, capitalization and spelling. Many errors in sentence structure and word usage. No evidence on knowledge in language mechanics 2 Organization- Structural Development of the Idea Demonstrates logical and subtle sequencing of ideas through well-developed paragraphs; transitions are used to enhance organization. Paragraph development present but not perfected. Logical organization; organization of ideas not fully developed. No evidence of structure or organization. 2 Reflect personal learning stretch in Science Project Shows great depth of knowledge and learning, reveals feelings and thoughts, abstract ideas reflected through use of details. Relates learning with research and project, personal and general reflections included, uses concrete language. Does not go deeply into the reflection of learning, generalizations and limited insight, uses some detail. Little or no explanation or reflection on learning. 2 Conclusion The conclusion is engaging and restates the thesis. The conclusion restates the thesis. The conclusion does not adequately restate the thesis.
- 10. Incomplete and/or unfocused. 2 Citation All cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format with no errors. Some cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format. Inconsistencies evident. Few cited works, both text and visual, are done in the correct format. Absent 2 Bibliography Done in the correct format with no errors. Includes more than 5 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. Periodicals available on-line are not considered internet sites) Done in the correct format with few errors. . Includes 5 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. Periodicals available on-line are not considered internet). Done in the correct format with some errors. Includes 4 major references (e.g. science journal articles, books, but no more than two internet sites. Periodicals available on-line are not considered internet). Absent or done incorrectly. 2