SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Soil Identifications and Classifications
Er. Madhav Prasad Guragain
Pathivara Engineering College
Purbanchal University
Soil classification organizes different soil types into groups based on their engineering or
agricultural properties. This helps determine their suitability for construction projects like dams,
highways, or foundations.
Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes
 Particle Size Classification
 Textural Classification
 Highway Research Board (HRB) Classification
 Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
 Indian Standard Classification System (ISCS)
 1. Particle Size Classification
 Soils are classified based on grain size.
 Terms like gravel, sand, silt, and clay describe particle sizes, not natural soil types.
Common classification systems:
 U.S. Bureau of Soil and Public Road Administration (PRA)
 International Soil Classification
 M.I.T. Classification
 Indian Standard Classification (IS: 1948–1970)
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
2. Textural Classification
 Based on percentages of sand, silt, and clay in a soil sample.
 Best suited for coarse-grained soils (clay properties depend less on particle size).
 Triangular Classification Chart (U.S. PRA) is commonly used.
How to Use the Chart:
 Determine percentages of sand, silt, and clay.
 Draw lines parallel to the triangle’s sides based on these percentages.
 The intersection point identifies the soil type (e.g., Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam).
 Example:
 30% sand, 30% silt, 40% clay Classified as Clay.
→
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
3. Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)
 Soils are divided into 4 major groups:
 Coarse-grained (retained on No. 200 sieve 75 Micron)
 Fine-grained (passes No. 200 sieve=75 Micron)
 Organic soils (Moderate (20–75%) organic matter mixed with mineral soil)
 Peat (Very high (>75%) organic matter, almost entirely decomposed vegetation)
Group Symbols (Prefix + Suffix)
Prefix Meaning Suffix Meaning
 G Gravel W Well-graded
 S Sand P Poorly-graded
 M Silt C Clayey fines
 C Clay L Low plasticity (wL < 50%)
 O Organic H High plasticity (wL > 50%)
 Pt Peat
Classification Criteria:
Coarse-grained (>50% retained on No. 200 sieve):
 Gravel (G) if >50% coarse fraction is >4.75 mm.
 Sand (S) if >50% coarse fraction is <4.75 mm.
 Fines content:
 <5%: GW, SW, GP, SP
 >12%: GM, GC, SM, SC
 5–12%: Dual symbols (e.g., GW-GM)
Fine-grained (>50% passes No. 200 sieve):
 Classified using Plasticity Chart (Fig 4.3).
 A-line equation: IP = 0.73(wL – 20) separates clays (above) from silts/organics (below).
 Subdivided by wL:
 Low plasticity (L): wL < 50%
 High plasticity (H): wL > 50%
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
4. Indian Standard Classification System (ISCS)
Based on USCS but with modifications for fine-grained soils.
Key Differences from USCS:
 Fine-grained soils divided into 3 groups (vs. 2 in USCS):
 Low compressibility (L): wL < 35
 Medium compressibility (I): 35 ≤ wL ≤ 50
 High compressibility (H): wL > 50
Soil Groups in ISCS:
Coarse-grained (>50% >75 µm)
 Gravel (G) or Sand (S) based on 4.75 mm sieve.
 Subgroups: W (Well-graded), C (Clayey), P (Poorly-graded).
Fine-grained (>50% <75 µm)
 Inorganic silts (M), Clays (C), Organics (O).
 Classified using Plasticity Chart (Fig 4.4).
 Highly organic soils (Peat, etc.)
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Classification  of soils: Soil Mechanics
Majority of Indian Black cotton soils lie along a band above the A-line. The
plot of some of the blackcotton soils is also found to lie below the A-line.
Care should be taken in classifying such soils.
5. AASTHO Classification
it is a widely used system in civil engineering to classify soils based on their
suitability for highway subgrade, subbase, and base construction. AASHTO stands
for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
Soils are classified into seven major groups:
A-1 to A-7, with A-1 being the best for road construction and A-7 the worst.
Group Description Typical Soil Type
A-1
Best quality granular
materials
Gravel and sand with good
gradation
A-2
Good quality granular
materials
Silty or clayey gravel/sand
A-3
Fine sand with limited silt
or clay
Clean fine sand
A-4 Fair to poor silty soils Silty soils, non-plastic
A-5 Poor silty soils
High silt content, elastic
silts
A-6 Fair to poor clayey soils Plastic clays
A-7 Worst quality soils Highly plastic clays
 To classify a soil using AASHTO, you typically need:
• Grain size analysis
• Liquid Limit (LL)
• Plasticity Index (PI)
 Group Index (GI):
 Used to further evaluate the quality of fine-grained soils (A-2 to A-7):
GI=(F−35)[0.2+0.005(LL−40)]+0.01(F−15)(PI−10)
 Where:
 F = % passing No. 200 sieve
 LL = Liquid Limit
 PI = Plasticity Index
GI = 0 for good subgrade soil
GI > 20 for poor subgrade soil
Group
% Passing
No. 200
LL PI GI
Use in
Roadwork
A-1 < 35% — — 0-1
Excellent
subgrade
A-2 < 35% Var. Var. 0–10
Good
subgrade
A-3 < 10% — — 0
Acceptable
subgrade
A-4 > 35% < 40 < 10 Low
Fair to poor
subgrade
A-5 > 35% > 40 < 10 High
Poor
subgrade
A-6 > 35% < 40 > 10 High
Poor
subgrade
A-7 > 35% > 40 > 10 Very high
Unsuitable
subgrade
1. Agriculture & Crop Production
 Soil Fertility Management: Classification helps identify nutrient deficiencies and
organic matter content, guiding fertilizer application.
 Irrigation Planning: Knowing soil texture (e.g., sandy, clayey, loamy) helps
determine water retention and drainage needs.
 Crop Suitability: Certain crops thrive in specific soil types (e.g., rice in clayey
soils, grapes in well-drained loamy soils).
2. Geotechnical & Construction Engineering
 Foundation Design: Engineers classify soils (e.g., Unified Soil Classification System
- USCS) to assess load-bearing capacity and settlement risks.
 Slope Stability & Erosion Control: Clay-rich soils may expand when wet, while
sandy soils are prone to erosion; classification helps in stabilization.
 Road & Pavement Design: Subgrade soil type (e.g., AASHTO classification) affects
road durability and material selection.
1. Agriculture & Crop Production
 Soil Fertility Management: Classification helps identify nutrient deficiencies and
organic matter content, guiding fertilizer application.
 Irrigation Planning: Knowing soil texture (e.g., sandy, clayey, loamy) helps
determine water retention and drainage needs.
 Crop Suitability: Certain crops thrive in specific soil types (e.g., rice in clayey
soils, grapes in well-drained loamy soils).
2. Geotechnical & Construction Engineering
 Foundation Design: Engineers classify soils (e.g., Unified Soil Classification System
- USCS) to assess load-bearing capacity and settlement risks.
 Slope Stability & Erosion Control: Clay-rich soils may expand when wet, while
sandy soils are prone to erosion; classification helps in stabilization.
 Road & Pavement Design: Subgrade soil type (e.g., AASHTO classification) affects
road durability and material selection.
Practical Implication of Soil Classification System
3. Environmental Management & Land Use Planning
 Contaminant Retention & Remediation: Clay soils retain pollutants, while sandy soils allow
faster leaching -> classification guides cleanup strategies.
 Wetland Delineation: Hydric soil classification helps in identifying and protecting wetlands.
 Urban Development: Soil surveys prevent construction on unstable or expansive soils.
4. Water Management & Hydrology
 Drainage Systems: Soil permeability (from classification) determines drainage requirements.
 Flood Risk Assessment: Low-permeability soils (e.g., clay) increase runoff and flood risks.
5. Forestry & Ecosystem Management
 Reforestation Efforts: Soil type affects tree species selection for afforestation.
 Erosion Control in Sloped Areas: Soil classification helps in selecting appropriate vegetation
for stabilization.
6. Disaster Risk Reduction
 Landslide Prediction: Clay-rich soils are prone to landslides when saturated.
 Earthquake Liquefaction Risk: Sandy, loose soils are more susceptible to liquefaction.
Key Soil Classification Systems & Their Uses
 USDA Soil Taxonomy (Agriculture, Ecology)
 Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (Geotechnical Engineering)
 AASHTO Classification (Road Construction)
 World Reference Base (WRB) for Soil Resources (Global Soil Mapping)
(Q1.) For a given soil, the following are known:
• Total mass of soil sieved= 200gm
• Cumulative mass retained on 4.75mm sieve=30gm
• Cumulative mass retained on 75 micron sieve=150gm
• Liquid limit =38%
• Plastic limit = 28%
• Natural water content = 32%
Classify the soil using the Unified Soil Classification System.
Step 1: Determine % Finer than 75 µm Sieve
Given:
- Total mass of soil sieved = 200 gm
- Cumulative mass retained on 75 µm sieve = 150 gm
% Passing 75 µm sieve = ((200 - 150) / 200) × 100 = 25%
Since only 25% passes the 75 µm sieve, the soil is a coarse-grained soil.
→
Step 2: Determine Type of Coarse Soil — Sand or Gravel
- Cumulative mass retained on 4.75 mm sieve = 30 gm
- % retained on 4.75 mm = (30 / 200) × 100 = 15%
- Therefore, % passing 4.75 mm = 85%
More than 50% of coarse fraction passes 4.75 mm sieve, so the soil is sand (not
→
gravel).
Step 4: Use Atterberg Limits to Differentiate between SM and SC
Given:
- Liquid Limit (LL) = 38%
- Plastic Limit (PL) = 28%
- Plasticity Index (PI) = LL PL = 38 28 = 10%
− −
Using Plasticity Chart Criteria:
- 0.73(LL 20) = 0.73 × (38 20) = 13.14%
− −
- Since PI = 10% < 13.14% Silty Sand (SM)
→
Final Soil Classification (USCS)
USCS Group Symbol: SM — Silty Sand
Question (Q2):
Given:
- Total mass of soil sieved = 500 gm
- Mass retained on 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve = 320 gm
- Mass retained on 75 micron (No. 200) sieve = 450 gm
- Liquid Limit (LL) = 42%
- Plastic Limit (PL) = 24%
Classify the soil using USCS.
1. Calculate % Gravel, Sand, and Fines:
% Gravel = (Mass on 4.75 mm sieve / Total mass) × 100
= (320 / 500) × 100 = 64%
% Sand = ((Mass on 75 micron sieve) - (Mass on 4.75 mm sieve)) / Total mass × 100
= (450 - 320) / 500 × 100 = 26%
% Fines = 100 - (% Gravel + % Sand)
= 100 - (64 + 26) = 10%
Since % Fines (10%) < 50% → Coarse-grained soil.
2. Determine Primary Component (Gravel or Sand):
% Gravel (64%) > % Sand (26%) → Primary Symbol = G (Gravel)
3. Check Plasticity of Fines (if % Fines > 5%):
Plasticity Index (PI) = LL - PL = 42 - 24 = 18%
A-line equation: PI = 0.73(LL - 20) = 0.73(42 - 20) = 16.06%
Since PI (18%) > A-line (16.06%) → Fines are Clay (C).
4. Final Classification:
- % Fines = 10% (5% < Fines < 12%) → Dual symbol not mandatory (PI clearly indicates clay).
- Soil Type = GC (Clayey Gravel).
Final Classification: GC
Step Calculation Result
% Gravel (320 / 500) × 100 64%
% Sand (450 - 320) / 500 × 100 26%
% Fines 100 - (64 + 26) 10%
PI 42 - 24 18%
A-line PI 0.73(42 - 20) 16.06%
Classification Gravel (G) + Clay (C) GC
References

More Related Content

PDF
Lecture 4 classification of soil
DOCX
Geotechnical Engineering : Soil classification
PDF
C ross soil
PDF
Classification os soil
PPTX
Soil Classification of Soils. ASSHTO USC
PPT
8 soil description and classification
PDF
Soil Taxonomy & Classification
PPTX
Soil classification
Lecture 4 classification of soil
Geotechnical Engineering : Soil classification
C ross soil
Classification os soil
Soil Classification of Soils. ASSHTO USC
8 soil description and classification
Soil Taxonomy & Classification
Soil classification

Similar to Classification of soils: Soil Mechanics (20)

PPTX
SOIL MECHANICS INTRODUCTION WITH ADVANTAGES AND WHY SOIL MECHANICS STUDY IS S...
PPTX
Visual and Lab Based Soil Classification.pptx
PPT
Soil Classification.ppt
PDF
IS Classification of Soils
PDF
Cap vi sist clasif_gm suelos_2020_ii
PPTX
Classification of soil from Geotechnical Engineering.pptx
PPTX
9 soil classification
PDF
Classification and Interpretaiton of Soil
PPTX
Classification of soil
PPSX
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #11: USCS & AASHTO]
PDF
1.identification classification of soil
PPT
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
PPT
SOIL
PPTX
SOIL AND ITS CLASSIFICATION: Construction.pptx
PPT
3 b soil classification
PPT
Soil Classification
PPTX
Building materials - Soil
PPT
Soil classification 1
PPTX
Lecture-2 Soil mechanics Classification (1).pptx
PPTX
Classification of soil
SOIL MECHANICS INTRODUCTION WITH ADVANTAGES AND WHY SOIL MECHANICS STUDY IS S...
Visual and Lab Based Soil Classification.pptx
Soil Classification.ppt
IS Classification of Soils
Cap vi sist clasif_gm suelos_2020_ii
Classification of soil from Geotechnical Engineering.pptx
9 soil classification
Classification and Interpretaiton of Soil
Classification of soil
Geotechnical Engineering-I [Lec #11: USCS & AASHTO]
1.identification classification of soil
Pavement Engineering Materials_5
SOIL
SOIL AND ITS CLASSIFICATION: Construction.pptx
3 b soil classification
Soil Classification
Building materials - Soil
Soil classification 1
Lecture-2 Soil mechanics Classification (1).pptx
Classification of soil
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
PPTX
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
PDF
Arduino robotics embedded978-1-4302-3184-4.pdf
PDF
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
PPTX
Recipes for Real Time Voice AI WebRTC, SLMs and Open Source Software.pptx
PPTX
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
PDF
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPTX
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
PPTX
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
PPTX
Strings in CPP - Strings in C++ are sequences of characters used to store and...
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PPTX
web development for engineering and engineering
PPTX
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
PDF
Digital Logic Computer Design lecture notes
PPTX
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
PPTX
MCN 401 KTU-2019-PPE KITS-MODULE 2.pptx
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PDF
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
Arduino robotics embedded978-1-4302-3184-4.pdf
PRIZ Academy - 9 Windows Thinking Where to Invest Today to Win Tomorrow.pdf
Recipes for Real Time Voice AI WebRTC, SLMs and Open Source Software.pptx
M Tech Sem 1 Civil Engineering Environmental Sciences.pptx
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
FINAL REVIEW FOR COPD DIANOSIS FOR PULMONARY DISEASE.pptx
CYBER-CRIMES AND SECURITY A guide to understanding
Strings in CPP - Strings in C++ are sequences of characters used to store and...
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
web development for engineering and engineering
UNIT 4 Total Quality Management .pptx
Digital Logic Computer Design lecture notes
CARTOGRAPHY AND GEOINFORMATION VISUALIZATION chapter1 NPTE (2).pptx
MCN 401 KTU-2019-PPE KITS-MODULE 2.pptx
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
Ad

Classification of soils: Soil Mechanics

  • 1. Soil Identifications and Classifications Er. Madhav Prasad Guragain Pathivara Engineering College Purbanchal University
  • 2. Soil classification organizes different soil types into groups based on their engineering or agricultural properties. This helps determine their suitability for construction projects like dams, highways, or foundations. Classification Systems for Engineering Purposes  Particle Size Classification  Textural Classification  Highway Research Board (HRB) Classification  Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)  Indian Standard Classification System (ISCS)
  • 3.  1. Particle Size Classification  Soils are classified based on grain size.  Terms like gravel, sand, silt, and clay describe particle sizes, not natural soil types. Common classification systems:  U.S. Bureau of Soil and Public Road Administration (PRA)  International Soil Classification  M.I.T. Classification  Indian Standard Classification (IS: 1948–1970)
  • 5. 2. Textural Classification  Based on percentages of sand, silt, and clay in a soil sample.  Best suited for coarse-grained soils (clay properties depend less on particle size).  Triangular Classification Chart (U.S. PRA) is commonly used. How to Use the Chart:  Determine percentages of sand, silt, and clay.  Draw lines parallel to the triangle’s sides based on these percentages.  The intersection point identifies the soil type (e.g., Clay, Sandy Clay, Loam).  Example:  30% sand, 30% silt, 40% clay Classified as Clay. →
  • 7. 3. Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)  Soils are divided into 4 major groups:  Coarse-grained (retained on No. 200 sieve 75 Micron)  Fine-grained (passes No. 200 sieve=75 Micron)  Organic soils (Moderate (20–75%) organic matter mixed with mineral soil)  Peat (Very high (>75%) organic matter, almost entirely decomposed vegetation) Group Symbols (Prefix + Suffix) Prefix Meaning Suffix Meaning  G Gravel W Well-graded  S Sand P Poorly-graded  M Silt C Clayey fines  C Clay L Low plasticity (wL < 50%)  O Organic H High plasticity (wL > 50%)  Pt Peat
  • 8. Classification Criteria: Coarse-grained (>50% retained on No. 200 sieve):  Gravel (G) if >50% coarse fraction is >4.75 mm.  Sand (S) if >50% coarse fraction is <4.75 mm.  Fines content:  <5%: GW, SW, GP, SP  >12%: GM, GC, SM, SC  5–12%: Dual symbols (e.g., GW-GM) Fine-grained (>50% passes No. 200 sieve):  Classified using Plasticity Chart (Fig 4.3).  A-line equation: IP = 0.73(wL – 20) separates clays (above) from silts/organics (below).  Subdivided by wL:  Low plasticity (L): wL < 50%  High plasticity (H): wL > 50%
  • 12. 4. Indian Standard Classification System (ISCS) Based on USCS but with modifications for fine-grained soils. Key Differences from USCS:  Fine-grained soils divided into 3 groups (vs. 2 in USCS):  Low compressibility (L): wL < 35  Medium compressibility (I): 35 ≤ wL ≤ 50  High compressibility (H): wL > 50 Soil Groups in ISCS: Coarse-grained (>50% >75 µm)  Gravel (G) or Sand (S) based on 4.75 mm sieve.  Subgroups: W (Well-graded), C (Clayey), P (Poorly-graded). Fine-grained (>50% <75 µm)  Inorganic silts (M), Clays (C), Organics (O).  Classified using Plasticity Chart (Fig 4.4).  Highly organic soils (Peat, etc.)
  • 17. Majority of Indian Black cotton soils lie along a band above the A-line. The plot of some of the blackcotton soils is also found to lie below the A-line. Care should be taken in classifying such soils.
  • 18. 5. AASTHO Classification it is a widely used system in civil engineering to classify soils based on their suitability for highway subgrade, subbase, and base construction. AASHTO stands for American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Soils are classified into seven major groups: A-1 to A-7, with A-1 being the best for road construction and A-7 the worst. Group Description Typical Soil Type A-1 Best quality granular materials Gravel and sand with good gradation A-2 Good quality granular materials Silty or clayey gravel/sand A-3 Fine sand with limited silt or clay Clean fine sand A-4 Fair to poor silty soils Silty soils, non-plastic A-5 Poor silty soils High silt content, elastic silts A-6 Fair to poor clayey soils Plastic clays A-7 Worst quality soils Highly plastic clays
  • 19.  To classify a soil using AASHTO, you typically need: • Grain size analysis • Liquid Limit (LL) • Plasticity Index (PI)  Group Index (GI):  Used to further evaluate the quality of fine-grained soils (A-2 to A-7): GI=(F−35)[0.2+0.005(LL−40)]+0.01(F−15)(PI−10)  Where:  F = % passing No. 200 sieve  LL = Liquid Limit  PI = Plasticity Index GI = 0 for good subgrade soil GI > 20 for poor subgrade soil
  • 20. Group % Passing No. 200 LL PI GI Use in Roadwork A-1 < 35% — — 0-1 Excellent subgrade A-2 < 35% Var. Var. 0–10 Good subgrade A-3 < 10% — — 0 Acceptable subgrade A-4 > 35% < 40 < 10 Low Fair to poor subgrade A-5 > 35% > 40 < 10 High Poor subgrade A-6 > 35% < 40 > 10 High Poor subgrade A-7 > 35% > 40 > 10 Very high Unsuitable subgrade
  • 21. 1. Agriculture & Crop Production  Soil Fertility Management: Classification helps identify nutrient deficiencies and organic matter content, guiding fertilizer application.  Irrigation Planning: Knowing soil texture (e.g., sandy, clayey, loamy) helps determine water retention and drainage needs.  Crop Suitability: Certain crops thrive in specific soil types (e.g., rice in clayey soils, grapes in well-drained loamy soils). 2. Geotechnical & Construction Engineering  Foundation Design: Engineers classify soils (e.g., Unified Soil Classification System - USCS) to assess load-bearing capacity and settlement risks.  Slope Stability & Erosion Control: Clay-rich soils may expand when wet, while sandy soils are prone to erosion; classification helps in stabilization.  Road & Pavement Design: Subgrade soil type (e.g., AASHTO classification) affects road durability and material selection.
  • 22. 1. Agriculture & Crop Production  Soil Fertility Management: Classification helps identify nutrient deficiencies and organic matter content, guiding fertilizer application.  Irrigation Planning: Knowing soil texture (e.g., sandy, clayey, loamy) helps determine water retention and drainage needs.  Crop Suitability: Certain crops thrive in specific soil types (e.g., rice in clayey soils, grapes in well-drained loamy soils). 2. Geotechnical & Construction Engineering  Foundation Design: Engineers classify soils (e.g., Unified Soil Classification System - USCS) to assess load-bearing capacity and settlement risks.  Slope Stability & Erosion Control: Clay-rich soils may expand when wet, while sandy soils are prone to erosion; classification helps in stabilization.  Road & Pavement Design: Subgrade soil type (e.g., AASHTO classification) affects road durability and material selection. Practical Implication of Soil Classification System
  • 23. 3. Environmental Management & Land Use Planning  Contaminant Retention & Remediation: Clay soils retain pollutants, while sandy soils allow faster leaching -> classification guides cleanup strategies.  Wetland Delineation: Hydric soil classification helps in identifying and protecting wetlands.  Urban Development: Soil surveys prevent construction on unstable or expansive soils. 4. Water Management & Hydrology  Drainage Systems: Soil permeability (from classification) determines drainage requirements.  Flood Risk Assessment: Low-permeability soils (e.g., clay) increase runoff and flood risks. 5. Forestry & Ecosystem Management  Reforestation Efforts: Soil type affects tree species selection for afforestation.  Erosion Control in Sloped Areas: Soil classification helps in selecting appropriate vegetation for stabilization. 6. Disaster Risk Reduction  Landslide Prediction: Clay-rich soils are prone to landslides when saturated.  Earthquake Liquefaction Risk: Sandy, loose soils are more susceptible to liquefaction.
  • 24. Key Soil Classification Systems & Their Uses  USDA Soil Taxonomy (Agriculture, Ecology)  Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) (Geotechnical Engineering)  AASHTO Classification (Road Construction)  World Reference Base (WRB) for Soil Resources (Global Soil Mapping)
  • 25. (Q1.) For a given soil, the following are known: • Total mass of soil sieved= 200gm • Cumulative mass retained on 4.75mm sieve=30gm • Cumulative mass retained on 75 micron sieve=150gm • Liquid limit =38% • Plastic limit = 28% • Natural water content = 32% Classify the soil using the Unified Soil Classification System.
  • 26. Step 1: Determine % Finer than 75 µm Sieve Given: - Total mass of soil sieved = 200 gm - Cumulative mass retained on 75 µm sieve = 150 gm % Passing 75 µm sieve = ((200 - 150) / 200) × 100 = 25% Since only 25% passes the 75 µm sieve, the soil is a coarse-grained soil. → Step 2: Determine Type of Coarse Soil — Sand or Gravel - Cumulative mass retained on 4.75 mm sieve = 30 gm - % retained on 4.75 mm = (30 / 200) × 100 = 15% - Therefore, % passing 4.75 mm = 85% More than 50% of coarse fraction passes 4.75 mm sieve, so the soil is sand (not → gravel).
  • 27. Step 4: Use Atterberg Limits to Differentiate between SM and SC Given: - Liquid Limit (LL) = 38% - Plastic Limit (PL) = 28% - Plasticity Index (PI) = LL PL = 38 28 = 10% − − Using Plasticity Chart Criteria: - 0.73(LL 20) = 0.73 × (38 20) = 13.14% − − - Since PI = 10% < 13.14% Silty Sand (SM) → Final Soil Classification (USCS) USCS Group Symbol: SM — Silty Sand
  • 28. Question (Q2): Given: - Total mass of soil sieved = 500 gm - Mass retained on 4.75 mm (No. 4) sieve = 320 gm - Mass retained on 75 micron (No. 200) sieve = 450 gm - Liquid Limit (LL) = 42% - Plastic Limit (PL) = 24% Classify the soil using USCS.
  • 29. 1. Calculate % Gravel, Sand, and Fines: % Gravel = (Mass on 4.75 mm sieve / Total mass) × 100 = (320 / 500) × 100 = 64% % Sand = ((Mass on 75 micron sieve) - (Mass on 4.75 mm sieve)) / Total mass × 100 = (450 - 320) / 500 × 100 = 26% % Fines = 100 - (% Gravel + % Sand) = 100 - (64 + 26) = 10% Since % Fines (10%) < 50% → Coarse-grained soil. 2. Determine Primary Component (Gravel or Sand): % Gravel (64%) > % Sand (26%) → Primary Symbol = G (Gravel)
  • 30. 3. Check Plasticity of Fines (if % Fines > 5%): Plasticity Index (PI) = LL - PL = 42 - 24 = 18% A-line equation: PI = 0.73(LL - 20) = 0.73(42 - 20) = 16.06% Since PI (18%) > A-line (16.06%) → Fines are Clay (C). 4. Final Classification: - % Fines = 10% (5% < Fines < 12%) → Dual symbol not mandatory (PI clearly indicates clay). - Soil Type = GC (Clayey Gravel). Final Classification: GC Step Calculation Result % Gravel (320 / 500) × 100 64% % Sand (450 - 320) / 500 × 100 26% % Fines 100 - (64 + 26) 10% PI 42 - 24 18% A-line PI 0.73(42 - 20) 16.06% Classification Gravel (G) + Clay (C) GC