Community based peer support harris
2 likes791 views
The document reviews community-based peer support strategies, assessing their effectiveness in promoting health engagement and reducing health inequalities among various demographics. It highlights the importance of participatory processes in defining problems, designing interventions, and delivering support, emphasizing the role of peer relationships in fostering health literacy. The review outlines the challenges faced by peer support models and advocates for equitable partnerships that recognize community needs and social dynamics in health initiatives.
Community based peer support harris
- 1. Community-based Peer Support: A participatory review of what works, for whom, in what circumstances Janet Harris, University of Sheffield
- 2. Our review questions • What approaches to community engagement are most effective in promoting peer support, to which people and in what circumstances? • How does community-based peer support impact on understanding of existing health information and use of health information and health services to improve health and reduce health inequalities?
- 3. The peer support model in research Observed problem Design a peer support programme Peers deliver the intervention Health outcomes better with peer support What we wanted to know: How are communities engaged in: • Defining problems? • Designing programmes? • Deciding how to deliver the intervention? • How does this process influence outcomes?
- 4. Our team was a network • Included researchers at universities (Sheffield and Alberta) with various backgrounds: – Janet Harris: Public health, psychology, service provider and commissioner, community based participatory research (CBPR) – Jane Springett: Health promotion, CBPR – Liz Croot: Physiotherapy, research with ethnic groups and learning disabilities – Andrew Booth: systematic reviewer – Fiona Campbell: Nursing, systematic reviewer – Jill Thompson: Sociology, public & patient involvement – Elizabeth Goyder: Public health consultant – Patrice Van Cleemput: Health visiting, research with Gypsy, Roma & Travellers – Emma Wilkins, Yajing Yang: Research assistants • PLUS practitioners, community workers, volunteers and recipients of peer support
- 5. We contacted people who worked in the same health areas as the peer support research topics TOPIC Advisory Network Breastfeeding Sheffield Cubed; Sheffield Breastfeeding study Darnall Wellbeing AGE UK; Stroke Association Irish Gypsy & Travellers Movement in Britain; Leicester Health Ambassadors Centre for HIV & Sexual Health; Parent to Parent, Shout; Sheena Amos Trust; Expert Patients Programme Sheffield Community Chronic Pain; Manor & Castle Development Trust MECOPP Minority Ethnic Carers of People Project; Autism Plus Sharrow ShipShape; Sheffield PCT MIND; Mencap Sheffield City Council SOAR (Southey Owlerton Area Regeneration) ZEST Community Development Trust Diabetes Healthy Living Older People HIV/AIDS Health Trainers Nutrition Smoking
- 6. Describing peer support • 11 informal meetings, 5 coordinated by Sheffield Cubed • Plus email correspondence, telephone discussions, individual discussions • Notes taken by community workers and researchers • Fed back to participants, who revised and clarified • Resident artist: Sarah Smizz
- 7. Don’t make assumptions that literature adequately describes implementation Define concepts Compare definitions Identify what works Network with participants Scope the literature Explore gaps Test the emerging theory Propose a model Research knowledge Community knowledge We’ll find the answers in the literature – they can fill in the gaps Fill in the gaps?? There’s no description of what actually happens in the literature
- 8. What is a ‘peer’? • A peer has been defined as a person who shares common characteristics* (e.g. age, sex, disease status, health condition, stressor) with the individual or group of interest, such that the “peer” is able to relate to, and empathize with the person on a level that a non-peer would not be able to (Doull et al 2005; Hill, 1996). “People didn’t necessarily have to live in that community or look exactly the same. It’s not as obvious as they’re this age and they’re this sex and they’re this colour or they live in this place. It was more about like- mindedness and values and stuff.” “Some of the people I work with we’re like worlds apart. I think it helps with the support to share your background, your experiences.”
- 9. Participants say that a peer is • Someone that they can find some common ground with • Someone who relates to them on an equal footing – ‘participatory parity’ • Characteristics are not always seen to be as important as the nature of relationships and interactions
- 10. What is support? • Peer support within a healthcare context is the provision of – emotional, appraisal, informational, and instrumental assistance (Dennis 2003:329) • What about instrumental support e.g. practical help? – “The literature clearly demonstrated that peer support primarily occurs without the provision of instrumental support” (Dennis, 2003). • But the network said that ‘Being together and doing together’ is the most important form of support for developing health literacy: – ‘we took them to the website’; ‘we look at the food labels together when we’re cooking; ‘we shopped for healthy food’; ‘I took her to the clinic’; ‘I showed him how to get to the swimming’; ‘she was anxious so we went together the first time’
- 11. Working with different models of reality • In the published research, whose reality is represented by the intervention? • Two ways of conceptualising peer support: – Authoritarian interventions: • designed by health professionals and health researchers • aim to persuade people to adopt healthier behaviours • Peer supporters were the vehicle for delivering the pre- designed intervention – Negotiated interventions • Based on community needs assessment • Co-designed by community members • Adapted by peer supporters, who were allowed to exercise judgement in what to do and when • Focus on enabling people to take control rather than persuading
- 12. The peer support model in research Figure 23: Theory of change for peer delivered interventions (O’Mara-Eves et al, 2013)Observed problem Health system designs intervention to address problem Peers deliver the intervention Outcomes higher than they would have been due to peer delivery
- 13. What works best, for whom, in what circumstances? • Peers as a vehicle for getting an intervention into a community? • OR • Peers as facilitators that help people to get better connected within their own communities?
- 14. The network’s ‘bicycle model’ of peer support
- 15. Helping people to connect builds confidence
- 16. “It’s a process that takes time.” “One of the hardest things is getting people to come in the first place.” “It’s ‘hidden’ work, getting people to engage. It doesn’t get funded.” “Supporting volunteers and helping them to move on is essential. There’s an obvious benefit, but it’s underfunded.” “There are a lot of social outcomes before you get to the health outcomes. How do we measure that?”
- 17. How do we connect community wellbeing and resilience to health? The social model of health To health researchNeed to connect social research
- 18. “My analogy of it is that it’s almost that you’ve got a group of academics if you like sort of sat in one place building this brilliant mansion. But they’re not talking to the people who it’s there for, who are the concrete. So they’ve put their mansion on some sand and it sinks. “ (AN11) Research needs to connect social support and health
- 19. An equity context works for community-based programmes • An equity context includes equitable partnerships and co-created programmes : – Acknowledging and valuing customs and beliefs – Willingness to hand power and control over to peer supporters and participants – Allowing PS to use their experiential knowledge – Understanding that the social process - time to develop relationships and connections - is part of the intervention – Recognising that people often need to develop capabilities in areas of life before they are ready to deal with health
- 20. How does peer support relate to health inequalities? • Improved health and well being • Increased confidence, agency, self esteem • Capability developed • Shame and embarrassment countered by group support • Inclusion in networks – giving and getting • Helping to make connections • Critical reflection – What do you see yourself doing? • Relationship building (1 to 1) PEER SUPPORT • Avoidance of health issues • Fear of negative judgements • Feelings of shame, inadequacy, embarrassment • Difficulties managing demands of everyday life • Isolation, feelings of exclusion • Low social status (perceived, internalized) Health inequalities Social support
- 21. Further information • Funded by the National Institute of Health Research Public Health programme PHR - 09/3008/04: Community-based peer support: A realist synthesis and model for promoting health literacy (COPES) • A big thank you to Adam Wragg, who illustrated the information by describing the Social Club at Autism Plus Contact details: Janet.harris@sheffield.ac.uk