Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Starting Induction Motor

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 09 Issue: 12 | Dec 2022 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2022, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.529 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 322
Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Starting Induction Motor
Nana Twum Duah1, Isaac Kofi Otchere2, Kwabena Amoako Kyeremeh3, Joseph Owusu4
1Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering
2University of Energy and Natural Resources- Sunyani, Ghana
---------------------------------------------------------------------***---------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract - Induction motors account for approximately
70% of all electric motors used for industrial purposes as a
result of their versatility, robustness, reliability, low cost and
high efficiency. However, induction motors have an
undesirable characteristic of drawing high current during
start-up. This necessitates special starting methods to
monitor and control the starting current. The high starting
current leads to issues such as a dip in the power system
voltage which affects other systems and equipment
connected to the affected power system. Various starting
methods have been developed to overcome this problem. Six
of these methods have been discussed and analyzed in this
paper: Direct- on-line (DOL), Star-Delta, Autotransformer,
Capacitor Starting and Soft Starting. A comparison of their
current, torque, and speed are analyzed. Results obtain
shows that an absolute conclusion cannot be made outright
about one starting method being better that the other
because there is a trade off in all these methods. Based on
the analysis, a new starting method is proposed, which may
eliminate the major deficiencies of the existing methods.
Key Words: Current, Induction motor, Soft Starting,
Speed, torque.
1. INTRODUCTION
LECTRIC MOTOR accounts for large percentage of the
generated electrical energy consumed. For instance, in
the European Union, electric motors account for as
much as 65%–70% of the consumed electrical energy
[1]. Most of these motors are 3-phase squirrel-cage
induction motors because of their reliability, robustness
and relatively low cost [2]. In spite of their usefulness in
industry, starting a 3-phase induction motor is of immense
concern to the stability of a power grid. A 3-phase
induction motor is theoretically self-stating, yet without
any specialized starting mechanism, the current drawn at
start can reach as high as 5-8 times the motor’s rated
current [3, 4]. Such large start current can destabilize the
grid causing dip in the grid voltage and have a serious
impact on the normal operation of other adjacent
equipment such as lights, sensitive equipment etc. The
start current may also have devastating effects on the
stator winding and rotor bar, damaging the winding
insulation [5, 6]. For these reasons, specialized starting
methods have been developed. The 3-phase squirrel-cage
induction motor (IM) may be started by supplying full
voltage or reduced voltage [6]. Direct On-Line (DOL), Star-
Delta and Autotransformer starting methods are
commonly used in fixed speed applications as traditional
electromechanical starters. Each starting method has its
own merits and demerits which make one starting method
preferred over the other. The basis for selection must be a
thorough understanding of the power system constraints,
the load to be accelerated and the overall cost of the
equipment [3]. The starting current of the various starting
methods is investigated in this paper using simulation
models that aid in understanding the starting
characteristics.
1.1 Three Phase Induction Motor
The starting method for a 3-phase induction motor is
not to provide a high starting torque but rather reduce
heavy starting currents and prevent motor from
overheating. There are several general methods developed
to address particular induction motor starting problems in
terms of the motor size and the stability of the connected
network.
In considering the factors taken into account in the
design of the starting methods, it is realized that, trade-offs
of certain factors may have to be introduced for a starting
method to suite a particular application [7]. The various
starting methods can be broadly categorized into
conventional motor starters and electronic drives [8].
Conventional motor starters are often used in fixed speed
applications and includes direct on-line, star-delta, shunt
capacitor and autotransformer starter. DOL starter is the
simplest and the most inexpensive of all the starting
methods with a very large starting current, normally 6 to 8
times the rated current [5]. The starting torque is likely to
be 0.75 to 2 times the full load torque [5]. DOL starter is
used only for motors with a rating of less than 5KW
[8]. Induction motors that are set up for star delta starter
are built so that the leads from each end of each phase
group are easily accessible. In this way the motor leads are
initially connected in star and once the motor speed
reaches about 70% of the rated speed, the power supply
connection to the motor is changed to a delta thus giving it
a full voltage. A major problem with the Star-Delta starter
is the spike in current that occurs during transition from
star to delta configuration. A closed transition starter is
developed which employs series resistors to eliminate the
current spike experienced by the open transition starter.
However, the closed transition starter results in reduced
torque and it does not provide speed control [9].
E

The autotransformer can be looked as an improvement
of the star-delta starter. It uses tap changes to reduce the
voltage available to the induction motor during start. This
will proportionally reduce the starting current and the
torque [5, 8]. The advantage of the autotransformer lies in
the users’ ability to select different tap values. With this,
the user may change the tap to suit a particular application.
However, the cost of installing an autotransformer is
expensive compared to the other conventional motor
starters. The induction motor requires large inductive
current to operate which lags the applied voltage. Shunt
capacitor starter acts to supply current that leads the
voltage hence reducing the amount of reactive power
required to be drawn from the power system. The shunt
capacitance may be left connected if they are properly
rated so as to provide power factor correction or removed
as the motor approaches rated speed.
Electronic drives allow the stator input voltage to be
gradually increase and hence the starting current. Soft
starters may employ semiconductors, to reduce the initial
start voltage of the induction motor resulting in lower
motor torque. During the starting process, the soft starter
progressively increases the motor voltage so that the
motor generate enough power to accelerate the load to
rated speed. The soft starter gradually increases the
voltage from a pre-set level, as low as 0V, to the rated
voltage. This causes very smooth start-up. However, this
results in higher harmonics being injected into the system.
The current limiting technique senses the current at the
motor so that the firing angle can be controlled
proportionately [10]. The soft starter adds significant
flexibility in operation and interoperability, due to the fact
that it is more sensitive to the mechanical load
characteristics. This also results in lower maintenance cost
and increased lifetime of the mechanical load, and can
result in improved energy efficiency. However, the trade-
off is the increased operational complexity, and soft
starters are generally expensive devices [7, 8].
The paper is organized as follows: Section II describes
the system modelling and its parameters. Section III
highlights a brief description of the various motor starters
using simulations and in Section IV, a number of case
studies and discussions are outlined. and the conclusions
are summarized in Section V.
2. SYSTEM MODELLING
The paper models three system primitives; three phase
squirrel-cage induction motor, induction motor starting
control circuit and a grid connected busbar system in Fig. 1.
The IM is modeled with ETAP® (Electrical Transient
Analyzer Program) as a 373kW 4kV dynamic machine
using the predefined circuit model MV500HP2P from
ETAP® library in Fig. 2. Using a NEMA design type B, the
model data describes the specific 373kW motor intended
for acceleration in this study. The parameters of the three-
phase IM is found in Table 1.
Table -1: THREE PHASE IM PARAMETERS
2.1 Modelling of Motor Load
The connected load is modeled as a simple fan with the
characteristic torque equation expressed in percentage as
in (1). The motor characteristics is shown in Fig. 3.
Load Torque = 10 – 91w + 321w2 -147w3 (1)
where w is a variable.
Fig. 1. System model
Model
Data
Rs(Ω) Xs(Ω) Xm(Ω) Xrlr(Ω) Xrfl(Ω) Rrlr(Ω) Rrfl(Ω)
3.832 10.29 365.2 9.3 11.67 1.23 1.52
Name
Plate
Data
KVA FLA % PF % Eff %NLA Inertia
kgm2
Torque
ft-lb
434 62.7 92.08 93.22 26.63 0.793 1481.9
Induction
Motor
Controller
a
b
c
Busbar
Fig. 2. Equivalent circuit of three phase induction
motor

Fig. 3. Motor Characteristic
The load torque is defined such that it lies distinctly
below the available machine torque so that under normal
operating conditions, it will accelerate. The coupling of the
fan to the motor is achieved by means of a simple coupling
gear. The motor must not only develop adequate torque to
overcome the fan load, but it must also have excess torque
to overcome the inertia of the fan and accelerate it to speed
within a desired amount of time. The coupling
arrangement of the fan inertia (WR), coupling gear and the
motor inertia is modeled as in (2).
2
2 2 f
ms fs
m
n
WR WR
n
 
  
 
(2)
where:
WRms : Inertia of fan load referred to motor speed.
WRfs : Inertia of fan load plus drives
nf : Speed of fan. nm: Speed of motor
ETAP uses the motor inertia (H) to generate corresponding
data for fan inertia in order to study the acceleration when
the value of H is manually inserted as shown in Table. 2.
TABLE 2: MOTOR COUPLING CHARACTERISTICS
Motor Coupling Load Total
RPM 1800 1800 1800 1800
WR2 118 59.02 295.1 472.1
H 0.198 0.099 0.496 0.793
3. Motor Starter Simulation
Five starting methods are implemented with ETAP but
the individual control circuits are all designed and
simulated with automation studio. Data from ETAP is
exported to MATLAB to plots the graphs. Graphs of current,
torque, speed with time are shown with all the various
starting methods. All the other methods are compared to
DOL method.
A. Direct-on-line Starting
DOL is implemented with a direct connection of the
motor terminals to the power source through a single
contactor in fig. 4. The motor draws a very high inrush
current. However, as the motor accelerates, the current
begins to drop, but until the motor is at a high speed,
typically about 85% of synchronous speed.
Fig. 4. Motor Circuit Connection
B. Star – Delta Start Method
The motor terminals are connected in the star pattern
initially reduces the line voltage by 57.7% and then the full
line voltage is applied in delta connection after the motor
achieve 85% of the rated speed. The connection is shown
in Fig. 5.
C. Capacitor start Method
The connection of this starter is demonstrated in fig.6.
The motor is first started in a single phase mode with the
help of a properly selected phase balancer capacitor and
then switched to normal three phase operation once its
speed reaches 70% of the rated speed.
D. Autotransformer start Method
The motor is connected to the secondary side of the
autotransformer while starting as in Fig.7. The taps on the
autotransformer limit the voltage applied to the motor to
50%, of the nominal voltage and the line current is less
than the motor rated current during starting.

E. Electronic Soft Start Method
Voltage ramping and limited current starting is used for the
electronic soft starting. Pulse width modulation (PWM) is
employed to trigger pulses to control the firing angle in
order to achieve the desired voltage control. The variation
of the firing angle limits the line voltage supplied to the
motor terminals. Fig.8 depicts Allen-Bradley soft starter
connection.
Fig. 5. Star Delta Start Method
Fig. 6. Capacitor Start Method
Fig. 7 Autotransformer start Method
Fig. 8 Allen-Bradley soft starter
4. Results and Discussion
The resulting graphs of current against time for the five
starting methods are given in Fig. 9. The starting current
of star delta starter is approximately 175% of the full load
current (FLC) as compared to DOL which is about 500%.
In the case of autotransformer start, the current starts
with about 125% of FLC. The current increases smoothly
to 310% of FLC as the speed increases before the
autotransformer is taken out of the circuit. Using the
capacitor method, the current rises to approximately
380% of FLC. However, in the soft-start method, the
current rises gently from 30% to 420% of the FLC when
the voltage is ramped from 10% to 100% using a current
limit of 750%. The current drops to the rated full load
current after 18 seconds. Star delta and autotransformer
starters have high inrush current during the switch over.
Fig.9. Starting currents

Fig.10. Starting torques
Fig. 11. Starting speeds
Fig. 10 shows graphs of starting torque with time for all
the starting methods. Both Capacitor and DOL starting
methods have similar torque characteristics. The starting
torque of star delta is 30% of the rated torque. The torque
of DOL and star delta rises sharply to the maximum torque
with in 4s and 14s respectively. The corresponding
starting torque for autotransformer method is
approximately 10% of the rated torque; this increases
gradually to 165% at 13s of the full load torque where the
autotransformer is taken out of circuit. The resulting
graphs of speed with time for all the five starting methods
are shown in Fig.11 The speed of DOL and capacitor start
reaches the rated speed with in 3s while it takes about 18s
for electronic softer starter to reach the rate speed. Star
delta starter and autotransformer starters takes almost
the same time to reach the rated speed.
5. CONCLUSION
The starting characteristics of different starting
methods for IM have been studied. Computer simulations
provide flexible means to aid in the decision making of the
best starting method to apply for specific applications. The
simulation results indicate that, an absolute conclusion
cannot be made outright about one starting method being
better than the other unless their frame of comparison is
justified. The star-delta, autotransformer and soft starter
reduces the starting current significantly however the
trade-off among these methods is the reduction in starting
torque. The star-delta and autotransformer can also have
disturbing switch-over transients. Also, increasing the
firing angle of the soft starter reduces the starting current
but increases the motor acceleration time. The results
show that there is trade-off in all the different stating
methods of IM.
It is observed that, all the starting methods try to
bring the motor up to the rated speed. The difference in
shape of the speed curve is as a result of, the various
starting methods drawing different amount of current to
bring the motor up to speed. It is projected that, if an
external means is used to bring the motor’s speed to at
least 60% of the rated speed before connecting to the
power source; the amps drawn will reduce
proportionally. This knowledge can be implemented as a
torque assisted method where smaller motor can be
used to turn a higher rated motor at no load to about
60% of the motor’s rated speed. The smaller motor is
then decoupled from the set up and the higher rated
motor connected to the power source. This method may
eliminate the major differences in the discussed starting
methods. Further work should be carried out on the
proposed method of to achieve an efficient design.
REFERENCES
[1] A. Almeida, F. Ferreira, J. Fong, and P. Fonseaca, "EuP
Lot 11 motors, ecodesign assessment of energy using
products," University of Coimbra, Brussels, Germany,
2008.
[2] Almeida, P. Fonseca, F. Ferreira, F. Guisse, A.Diop, A.
Previ, S. Russo, , "Improving the penetration of energy
- efficient motors and drives," University of Coimbra,
Brussels, Germany,, 2000
[3] S.K. Kim and T.K. Kim, "A Novel Hybrid Sequential
start control system for large inductive loads," Journal
of Electrical Engineering & Technology, vol. 10, no. 1,
pp. 388-394, 201
[4] W.J. Horvath, "Concepts, Configurations & Benerfits of
Motors Starting and Operation with MV AC Adjustable
Speed Drives," IEEE Cement Industry Techinical
Conference, pp. 258-274, 2008.
[5] "Tecnical Note Starting Method For AC Motors," ABB,
2010. [Online]. Available: http://bit.ly/2h1PoNw.
[Accessed 11 11 2016].
[6] Y. Sangsefidi, S. Ziaeinejad, H. P. Nabi and A. Shoulaie
"Induction motor control based on approximate stator
flux," IET Power Electronics, vol. 7, no. 11, pp. 2765-
2777, 2014.
[7] J.A. Kay, R.H. Paes, J. George Seggewiss and R.G. Ellis
"Methods for the Control of Large Medium -Voltage

Motors: Application considerations and guidelines,"
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 36, no.
6, pp. 1688 - 1696, 2000.
[8] K. Pillay, M. Nour, K.H Yang, D.N.D Harun and L.K.Haw,
"Assessment and Comparison of Conventional Motor
Starters and Modern Power Electronics Drives for
Induction Motor Starting Characteristics," 2009 IEEE
Symposium on Industrial Electronics and Applications,
ISIEA 2009-Pro., vol. 2, pp. 584-589, 2009.
[9] J. Bredthauer and N. Struck "Starting of large medium
voltage motors design, protection and safety aspects”
Proceedings of IEEE Petroleum and Chemical industry
Technical Conference, pp. 141-151, 2002.
[10] Y. Xiao, "Research on System of Combining Soft Start
and Doubly-Fed Speed Regulation," Advances in
Information Sciences and Service Science, vol. 4, no.
18, pp. 181-188, October 2012.

Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Starting Induction Motor

More Related Content

Similar to Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Starting Induction Motor (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Comparative Analysis of Different Methods of Starting Induction Motor