The document compares Computed Tomography (CT) and Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) in orthodontics, highlighting how each technology works, their indications, advantages, and disadvantages. CT offers high-contrast resolution and multiplanar imaging but has higher radiation exposure and cost, while CBCT provides rapid scanning and lower radiation doses, though with poorer soft tissue contrast. The conclusion indicates that while CBCT is a promising tool for orthodontics, it should be used judiciously when 2D imaging suffices.