SlideShare a Scribd company logo
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
DOI : 10.5121/ijctcm.2016.6201 1
CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON FUZZY
OBSERVERS FOR T-S FUZZY BILINEAR MODELS
Dhikra Saoudi
LSA - Laboratoire des Systèmes Avancés,
Polytechnic High School of Tunisia, University of Carthage,
BP 743, 2078 La Marsa, Tunisia.
ABSTRACT
This article is devoted to the design of a fuzzy-observer-based control for a class of nonlinear systems with
bilinear terms. The class of systems considered is the Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy bilinear model. A new
procedure to design the observer-based fuzzy controller for this class of systems is proposed. The aim is to
design the fuzzy controller and the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee
that the error between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero. By using the Lyapunov function,
sufficient conditions are derived such that the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable.
Moreover, sufficient conditions for controller design based on state estimation for robust stabilization of T-
S FBS with parametric uncertainties is proposed. The observer and controller gains are obtained by
solving some linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). An example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the
proposed approach.
Keywords
T-S fuzzy bilinear model, Fuzzy observer-based control, Lyapunov function, Parametric uncertainty, LMI.
1. INTRODUCTION
In recent years, the stability analysis and the synthesis of controllers/observers for nonlinear
systems have been the subject of many research works. In recent years, the stability analysis and
the synthesis of controllers/observers for nonlinear systems are still open problems owing to their
nature complexity and have been the subject of many research works. It is well known that
Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy model is a modelling method [1] that can represent or approximate a
large class of nonlinear systems by a set of local linear dynamics [2]. Various results have been
devoted to the stability analysis and stabilization of T-S fuzzy systems [3]-[7]. These results use
different techniques such as the system parameters to be known but in reality the parameters of
the system can be either uncertain or time-dependent. Moreover, the problem of stabilization
remains an important issue in the controller designs of uncertain nonlinear systems [8], [9]. It is
also necessary to consider the robust stability of uncertain T-S fuzzy models in order to guarantee
both stability and the robustness with respect to the latter. The study of robustness in fuzzy
model-based control has been studied widely in the literature for nonlinear systems. For example,
fuzzy model-based control for T-S fuzzy models has been studied in [10]-[12] and for T-S fuzzy
models with parametric uncertainties has been given in [13]-[15]. Moreover, it is noted that all of
the aforementioned assume that the system states are measured, which is not true in many control
systems and real applications. For this reason, observer-based fuzzy controllers were considered
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
2
in many researches. In [16]-[18], the authors have studied the controller designs based on fuzzy
observers for T-S fuzzy systems. Nonetheless, in [19]-[21], the authors have proposed sufficient
design conditions for robust stabilization of T-S fuzzy models with parametric uncertainties based
on state estimation.
In recent years, the fuzzy bilinear systems (FBS) based on the T-S fuzzy model with bilinear rule
consequence were considered in [22]-[24]. It is proved in these papers that often nonlinear
behaviours can be approximated by T-S bilinear multimodel description. This modeling method
is based on the bilinearization of the nonlinear system around some operating points and using
adequate weighting functions. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially suitable for a nonlinear
system with a bilinear term. Some topics of control are extended to T-S fuzzy bilinear model
(FBM). For example; in [22] proposed a fuzzy controller to stabilize the FBS and also for the
fuzzy bilinear systems with parametric uncertainties. In [23], [26], the authors studied the robust
∞H control problem for T-S FBS. In [25], the authors developed a static output feedback
controller for T-S discrete fuzzy bilinear systems (DFBS). Furthermore, the stabilization
problems of T-S FBS and T-S DFBS with time-delay have been proposed in [27],[28]. Moreover,
some studies have investigated the observer problem for T–S fuzzy bilinear systems [29]-[34] and
application to fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control, have been examined for this class of
systems in [35]-[37]. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has
investigated the problem of an observer-based control for T-S fuzzy bilinear models and a robust
stabilization for uncertain T-S fuzzy models.
In this paper, an observer-based control design for uncertain nonlinear systems in order to
guarantee the closed-loop stability is proposed. The T-S FBM is employed to represent a
nonlinear system with parametric uncertainties. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially
suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. The goal is to design the fuzzy controller and
the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee that the error
between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero. By employing the Lyapunov
function, design conditions are derived. The gains of the observer and the controller are obtained
by solving some linear matrix inequalities. So, this paper brings some results for the observer-
based control design dedicated to fuzzy bilinear models and uncertain fuzzy bilinear models.
This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the considered structure of the T-S fuzzy bilinear
system is presented. In Section 3, the problem of observer-based control for the fuzzy bilinear
systems is developed. In section 4, the method of controller design based on state estimation for
robust stabilization of T-S FBS with parametric uncertainties is proposed. an illustrative example
is provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in Section 5. Finally, Section 6
concludes the paper.
2. T-S FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL REPRESENTATION
In a fuzzy modelling framework, the fuzzy bilinear models based on the T-S fuzzy model with
bilinear rule consequence were an extension of the T-S fuzzy ordinary model. It is proved that
often nonlinear behaviours can be approximated by T-S fuzzy bilinear model description. This
technique is based on the bilinearization of the nonlinear system around some operating points
and using adequate weighting functions. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially suitable for a
nonlinear system with a bilinear term. Then, the fuzzy bilinear model is described by the
following fuzzy if-then rules:
1 1: if ( ) is and and ( ) isLi
i g igR t F t Fξ ξ
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
3
then
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t)
( ) ( )
= + +

=
& i i ix t A x t Bu t N x t
y t Cx t (1)
where iR denotes the th
i fuzzy rule $ { }1, ,∀ = Li r , r is the number of if-then rules, ( )i tξ are
the premise variables which can be measurable or not measurable, and ( (t))ij jF ξ are fuzzy set.
( )∈ℜn
x t is the state vector, ( )∈ℜu t is the control input, and ( )∈ℜp
y t is the system output.
The matrices , , ,i i iA B N C are known matrices.
Then, the overall FBM can be described as follows:
( )
1
( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t)
( ) ( )
=

= + +

 =
∑&
r
i i i i
i
x t h t A x t Bu t N x t
y t Cx t
ξ
(2)
where (.)ih verify the following properties:
{ }1
( ( )) 1
1,2, ,
0 ( ( )) 1
=

=
∀ ∈
 ≤ ≤
∑ L
r
i
i
i
h t
i r
h t
ξ
ξ
(3)
Remark 1: Matrices , ,i i iA B N and C can be obtained by using the polytopic
transformation [2]. The advantage of this method is in one hand to lead to a bilinear
transformation of the nonlinear model without any approximation error, and in another hand to
reduce the number of local models compared to other methods [22].
3. CONTROL OF THE FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL
In this section, we will develop the observer-based control problem for the fuzzy bilinear systems.
Thereafter, we will propose sufficient conditions that guarantees the closed-loop stability by
using a Lyapunov function-based design approach. The goal is to design the fuzzy controller and
the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee that the error
between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero.
Many studies consider that all the state variables of the system are available. However in practice
this assumption often does not hold. Hence, we need to define a fuzzy observer to estimate the
states and make an analysis of the error system, from which we provides a design method of a
fuzzy observer for the fuzzy bilinear system (2).
Then, the proposed structure of the fuzzy bilinear observer has the following form:. Then, the
proposed structure of the fuzzy bilinear observer has the following form:
( )( )
1
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t) ( ) ( )
ˆ ˆ( ) ( )
=

= + + + ϒ −

 =
∑&
r
i i i i i
i
x t h t A x t Bu t N x t y t y t
y t Cx t
ξ
(4)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
4
where ˆ( )x t is the estimated state vector of ( )x t , and , 1, ,ϒ = Li i r are observer parameters to
be determined.
In this paper, it is assumed that all of the premise variables do not depend on the state variables
estimated by a fuzzy observer.
Following the design concept in [38], the fuzzy control law for FBM is formulated as follows:
( )
( )
( )
1
1
1
ˆ( )
( ) ( )
ˆ ˆ1 ( ) ( )
ˆ( ) sin ( )
ˆˆ( ) ( )cos ( )
=
=
=
=
+
=
=
∑
∑
∑
r
i
i T T
i
i i
r
i i
i
r
i i i
i
D x t
u t h t
x t D D x t
h t t
h t D x t t
ρ
ξ
ξ ρ θ
ξ ρ θ
(5)
where:
ˆ( ) 1ˆ ˆsin ( ) , cos ( )
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ1 ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( )
ˆ ,
2 2
= =
+ +
 
∈ − 
 
i
i iT T T T
i i i i
i
D x t
t t
x t D D x t x t D D x t
θ θ
π π
θ
ρ is a given scalar, and 1
, 1, ,r×
∈ℜ = Ln
iD i are vectors to be determined.
Let us define the state estimation error:
( ) ( ) ( )ˆ= −e t x t x t (6)
Then, one can obtain the fuzzy observer error dynamics from (2), (4), and (5):
( ) ( ) ( )( )1 1
ˆ( ) ( ) ( ) + sin ( ) ( )
= =
= + ϒ∑∑&
r r
i j i i i j
i j
e t h t h t A C N t e tξ ξ ρ θ (7)
Let us define the augmented system containing both the fuzzy controller and observer
  
TT T
x e which dynamics is given by the augmented system:
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
   
=   
   
&
&
x t x t
A t
e t e t
ξ (8)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
5
where the matrices ( )( )A tξ are given by:
( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
( ) ( ) ( )
= =
= ∑∑
r r
i j ij
i j
A t h t h t Aξ ξ ξ
with:
ˆ ˆ ˆsin cos cos
ˆ0 sin
 + +
=  
+ ϒ +  
i i j i j j i j j
ij
i i i j
A N B D B D
A
A C N
ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ
The goal is to design the observer-based fuzzy controller (5) for the fuzzy bilinear system (2)
such that the closed-loop augmented system (8) becomes globally asymptotically stable.
Therefore, the main result is then propounded in the following theorem.
Theorem 1: If there exist symmetric positive definite matrices 1P and 2P , matrices ,i iW V and
positive scalars 0 , 0> >ε ρ such that LMIs (9) and (10) are satisfied, then the augmented
system described by (8) is asymptotically stable 1 , 1∀ = ∀ =L Li r j r
1 1
1
* * * *
* * *
00 * *
0 0 *
0 0 0
 +
 
− 
  <−
 
− 
 − 
T
i i
i
i j
T
i
A P PA
N P I
BV I
I I
B I
ρ
ε
(9)
2 2
2
1
* * *
* *
0
0 *
0 0 −
 + + +
 
−  <
 −
 
−  
T T T
i i i i
i
j
P A A P WC C W
P N I
I I
D I
ρ
ε
(10)
The gains of the observer and the state feedback control law are given by:
1
1
−
=i iD V P (11)
1
2
−
ϒ =i iP W (12)
Proof: In order to ensure the global, asymptotic stability, a new procedure for designing the
observer-based fuzzy controller (5) for the fuzzy bilinear system (2) is proposed such that the
closed-loop system (8) becomes asymptotically robust stable by using a Lyapunov function-based
design approach. Then from (8), the sufficient conditions must be verified:
( )0 , , 0∃ = > = + <T D T
ij ij ij ijQ Q M A Q A Q QA (13)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
6
Where
11
22
0
0
 
=  
 
Q
Q
Q
(14)
Let us define
( ) 1 2
, = +D D D
ij ij ij ijM A Q M M (15)
with
11 21
1 2
12 22
0 0
,
0 0
   
= =   
      
ij ijD D
ij ij
ij ij
D D
M M
D D
(16)
( )
( )
( )
11
11 11 11 11
11 11
12
22 22 22 22
22 22
21
22
22
22
ˆ ˆsin sin
ˆ ˆcos cos
ˆ ˆsin sin
ˆcos
ˆcos
= + + +
+ +
= + + +
+ ϒ + ϒ
=
=
T T
ij i i i j i j
T
i j j i j j
T T
ij i i i j i j
T
i i
ij i j j
T
ij i j j
D AQ Q A N Q Q N
Q B D B D Q
D AQ Q A N Q Q N
CQ Q C
D B D Q
D Q B D
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ
ρ θ
(17)
In order to investigate the stability criteria, the following lemma will be also used [39].
Lemma 1: For any matrices A and B with appropriate dimensions, the following property
holds for any positive scalar λ :
1−
+ ≤ +T T T T
A B B A A A B Bλ λ (18)
Let 11 1=Q P and 1
22 2
−
=Q P . From (16) and by using the separation Lemma (1) [40], one obtains:
( )
1
2
0
,
0
 
≤  
  
ijD
ij ij
ij
R
M A Q
R
(19)
In order to verify (13), we must have:
1
2
0
0
0
 
< 
  
ij
ij
R
R
(20)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
7
Which implies :
1
2
0
0
<
<
ij
ij
R
R
(21)
where:
( )
( )
1
1 1 1 1 1
1
1
2 1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
1 1 1 1
2 2 2 2
ˆ ˆ ˆsin sin cos
ˆcos
ˆ ˆsin sin
−
− − − −
− − − −
= + + + +
+ +
= + + +
+ ϒ + ϒ +
T T
ij i i i j i j i j j
T T
i j j i i
T T
ij i i i j i j
T T
i i j j
R A P PA N P PN B D P
P B D B B
R A P P A N P P N
CP P C P D D P
ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ε
ρ θ ρ θ
ε
From the following variable changes 1=i iV D P , 2= ϒi iW P , by using Lemma (1) and using the
Schur’s complement [39] to (21) results in (9) and (10). This completes the proof of the theorem.
4. ROBUST CONTROL OF THE FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL WITH
UNCERTAINTIES
In this section, we want to design the robust control of the FBM. The objective is to consider
parametric uncertainties in the system for modelling the behaviour of complex nonlinear dynamic
systems in order to design of a stabilizing control law, based on state estimation. The nonlinear
system is modeled as a T-S fuzzy bilinear model. Then, the dynamic equation of the fuzzy
bilinear system can be formulated in the following form:
( ) ( )
( )1
( ) ( )
( ) ( ( ))
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
=
  + ∆ + + ∆
=  
 + + ∆  

=
∑&
r
i i i i
i
i i i
A A x t B B u t
x t h t
N N x t u t
y t Cx t
ξ
(22)
The parameter uncertainties considered here are norm-bounded and presented by the form
[ ] [ ]1 2 3∆ ∆ ∆ =i i i i i i i iA B N M F E E E (23)
where 1 2 3, , ,i i i iM E E E are known real constant matrices of appropriate dimensions, and
iF is an unknown matrix function satisfying ( ) ( ) ≤T
i iF t F t I , in which I is the identity matrix of
appropriate dimension.
The feedback controller and the state of fuzzy bilinear observer for T-S fuzzy bilinear model with
parametric uncertainties (22) is the same as that for (2). In order to examine the robustness of the
fuzzy controller (5), the augmented system is represented as follows:
( )ˆ( ) ( ) ( )=&
a aX t A t X tξ (24)
where the matrices ( )ˆ ( )A tξ and the augmented vector ( )aX t are respectively given by:
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
8
( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
ˆ ˆ( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
( )
= =
=
 
=  
 
∑∑
r r
i j ij
i j
a
A t h t h t A
x t
X t
e t
ξ ξ ξ
with
11 12
21 22
ˆ Ξ Ξ 
=  Ξ Ξ 
ijA
( ) ( ) ( )
( )
( )
11
12
21
22
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆcos
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆ ˆsin cos
Ξ = + ∆ + + ∆ + + ∆
Ξ = + ∆
Ξ = − ∆ + ∆ + ∆
Ξ = + + ϒ − ∆
i i i i j i i j j
i i j j
i i j i j j
i i j i i j j
A A N N B B D
B B D
A N B D
A N C B D
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
The objective of this section is to seek a fuzzy observer-based controller of the form (5) such that
the closed-loop fuzzy augmented system (24) is globally asymptotically stable. Therefore, we
have a result that is summarized in the following theorem.
Theorem 2: If there exist symmetric positive definite matrices 1P and 2P , matrices ,i iW V and
positive scalars 0 , 0> >ε ρ such that LMIs (25) and (26) are satisfied, then the augmented
system described by (24) is asymptotically stable 1 , 1∀ = ∀ =L Li r j r
( )
1
1 1
2
3 1
1
1
2
2 1
1
* * * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * * *
0 * * * * * * * *
0 0 * * * * * * *
0 0 0 * * * * * *
0 0 0 0 * * * * *
0 0 0 0 0 * * * *
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
−
−
−
Π 
 −
 −

−
 −

−
 −

 + −

 −

−
 − 
i
i j
i
T
i
j
i j
T
i
i
i j
E P I
E V I
E P I
M I
V I
E V I
M I
N P I
BV I
I I
ε
ε
ε
ρ ε
ε
ε
ρ ε
ρ
0






 <








(25)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
9
( )
2
1
2
3
2
2
1
2
2 1
2
2
* * * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
0 * * * * * * *
0 0 * * * * * *
0 0 0 * * * * *
00 0 0 0 * * * *
0 0 0 0 0 * * *
1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 * *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 *
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
−
−
Π 
 − 
 −
 
− 
 −
  <− 
 −
 
 + −
 
 −
 
−  
i
i j
i
T
i
T
i
i j
T
i
i
E I
E D I
E I
B P I
M P I
E D I
M P I
P N I
I I
ε
ε
ε
ρ ε
ρ ε
ε
ρ ε
ρ
(26)
where : 1 1 1 2 2 2,Π = + Π = + + +T T T T
i i i i i iA P PA P A A P WC C W
The gains of the observer and the state feedback control law are given by:
1
1
−
=i iD V P (27)
1
2
−
ϒ =i iP W (28)
Proof:
To prove the stability of the closed-loop for the augmented system (24), the sufficient conditions
must be verified:
( )ˆ ˆ ˆˆ0 , , 0∃ = > = + <T D T
ij ij ij ijQ Q M A Q A Q QA (29)
Where
11
22
0
0
 
=  
 
Q
Q
Q
(30)
Let us define
( ) 1 2ˆˆ ˆ ˆ, = +D D D
ij ij ij ijM A Q M M (31)
where
1 11 12
1 2
21 222
ˆ 0
ˆ ˆ,
ˆ0
   ∆ ∆
= =   
∆ ∆     
ij ij ijD D
ij ij
ij ijij
D
M M
D
(32)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
10
( )
( )
1
11 11 11 11 11 11
2
22 22 22 22 22 22
11
11 11 11 11
11
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ sin sin cos cos
ˆ ˆˆ sin sin
ˆ ˆsin sin
= + + + + +
= + + + + ϒ + ϒ
∆ = ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆
+ ∆
TT T
ij i i i j i j i j j i j j
TT T
ij i i i j i j i i
T T
ij i i i j i j
D AQ Q A N Q Q N Q B D B D Q
D AQ Q A N Q Q N CQ Q C
AQ Q A N Q Q N
Q B
ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ ( )
( )
( ) ( )
11
12
22 22 22
11 11
21
22 22 22
11 11
22
ˆ ˆcos cos
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆ ˆcos cos
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆ ˆcos cos
+ ∆
∆ = − ∆ − ∆ − ∆
+ ∆ +
∆ = −∆ − ∆ − ∆
+ + ∆
∆
T
i j j i j j
TT T
ij i i j i j j
i j j i j j
ij i i j i j j
T T
i j j i j j
ij
D B D Q
Q A Q N Q B D
B D Q B D Q
AQ N Q B D Q
Q B D Q B D
θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
( )22 22
ˆ ˆcos cos= − ∆ − ∆
T
i j j i j jB D Q Q B Dρ θ ρ θ
(33)
The equation 2ˆ D
ijM can be reformulated as follows
2 1 2 3ˆ = Ψ + Ψ + ΨD
ij ij ij ijM (34)
with:
12 12 11
1 21 2 3
21 21 22
1 2
0 0 0
, ,
0 0 0
     Ψ Ψ ∆
Ψ = Ψ = Ψ =     
Ψ Ψ ∆          
ij ij ij
ij ij ij
ij ij ij
(35)
( )
( ) ( )
12
1 22 22 22
21
1 22 22 22
12
2 11 11
21
2 11 11
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆ ˆsin cos
ˆ ˆcos cos
ˆ ˆ= cos cos
Ψ = − ∆ − ∆ − ∆
Ψ = −∆ − ∆ − ∆
Ψ = ∆ +
Ψ + ∆
TT T
ij i i j i j j
ij i i j i j j
ij i j j i j j
T T
ij i j j i j j
Q A Q N Q B D
AQ N Q B D Q
B D Q B D Q
Q B D Q B D
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
ρ θ ρ θ
(36)
Let 11 1=Q P and 1
22 2
−
=Q P . Using the uncertainties structure and by using the separation
Lemma (1) [40], one obtains:
1
2
2
ˆ 0
ˆ
ˆ0
 
≤  
  
ijD
ij
ij
T
M
T
(37)
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
11
where:
( )1 2
1 1 1 2 2 1
1 2 1 1
1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1
1
1 3 3 1
2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2
ˆ 1 2
ˆ
− − −
−
− − − − − − − − −
= + + +
+ + +
+
= + +
T T T T T
ij i i i i j j j i i j
T T T T T
i i i i i i j i i j
T
i i
T T T T
ij i i i i j i i j
T M F F M PD D P PD E E D P
M F F M PE E P PD E E D P
PE E P
T P E E P P E E P P D E E D P
ρ ε ε ε
ε ρ ε ε
ε
ε ε ε
( )1 2 1 2 2
1 1
2 2 2 2
1 2− −
− −
+ + + +
+
T T T T T
i i i i i i i i i i
T T
j i i j
B B M F F M M FF M
P D E E D P
ε ρ ε ρ ρ ε
ε
(38)
From (31), (33) and (37), we have:
( )
1 1
2 2
ˆ ˆ 0
ˆˆ ,
ˆ ˆ0
 +
≤  
+  
ij ijD
ij ij
ij ij
D T
M A P
D T
(39)
In order to verify (29), we must have:
1
2
ˆ 0
0
ˆ0
 
< 
  
ij
ij
R
R
(40)
where:
1 1 1
2 2 2
ˆ ˆ ˆ
ˆ ˆ ˆ
= +
= +
ij ij ij
ij ij ij
R D T
R D T
(41)
Which implies :
1
2
ˆ 0
ˆ 0
<
<
ij
ij
R
R
(42)
Using the following variable changes 1=i iV D P , 2= ϒi iW P , and using the Schur’s complement
[39] to (42) results in (25) and (26). This completes the proof of the theorem.
To illustrate the theoretical development and the design algorithm, numerical example is
proposed in the following section.
5. SIMULATION EXAMPLE
In this section, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed design
conditions. Consider a nonlinear system represented by a T-S fuzzy bilinear model with
uncertainties of two local models:
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
12
( ) ( )
( )
2
1
( ) ( )
( ) ( ( ))
( ) ( )
( ) ( )
=
  + ∆ + + ∆
=  
 + + ∆  

=
∑&
i i i i
i
i i i
A A x t B B u t
x t h t
N N x t u t
y t Cx t
ξ
The numerical values of those parameters are defined by:
[ ]
1 1 1
2 2 2
0 0.8 1 1 0
, ,
1.5 3.2 1 0 1
0 0.5 2 1 0
, ,
1.5 3.4 1 0 1
1 0
−     
= = =     − − − −     
−     
= = =     − − − −     
=
A B N
A B N
C
Uncertainties are also defined by the following matrices:
1 11 21 31
2 12 22 32
0.1 0 0 0.5 1 0 0
, , ,
0 0.1 0 0.3 0.5 0 0
0.1 0 0 0.5 1 0 0
, , ,
0 0.1 0 0.6 0.5 0 0
       
= = = =       
       
       
= = = =       
       
M E E E
M E E E
The weighting functions are defined by:
( ) ( ) ( )
2
1
1 2 1
51( ) exp , ( ) 1 ( )
2 2
 + 
= = −     
x
h x t h x t h x t
In order to design robust observer-based controller for this uncertain T-S fuzzy bilinear system,
we solve LMIs of theorem 2. So, we obtain the following controller and observer gain matrices
respectively with 0.7=ρ :
[ ] [ ]
[ ] [ ]
2
2
1.94 0.18 , 1.35 0.08 ,
7.74 80.83 , 7.79 82.25
= − − = − −
ϒ = − − ϒ = − −
i
T T
i
D D
The simulation results are shown in figures (1)-(3). Figures (1) and (2) show respectively the
trajectories of states 1( )x t and 2 ( )x t of the considered system and their corresponding observer
variables. One can see that the estimated states can closely track the original states despite of the
presence of norm-bounded parametric uncertainties. Figure (3) shows the evolution of the control
signal.
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
13
Figure 1. The trajectories of the state 1( )x t and its estimate .
Figure 2. The trajectories of the state 2 ( )x t and its estimate .
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
14
Figure 3. Control signal ( )u t
6. CONCLUSION
In this paper, we have developed the fuzzy observer-based control problem and the robust
stabilization for continuous nonlinear systems. Such design is based on a T-S fuzzy bilinear
model representation, particularly suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. Design
conditions for an observer-based controller have been formulated and solved using a LMI
framework. The gains of the control and observer can be obtained by solving this set of LMIs.
Simulation results have checked the effectiveness of our approach in controlling nonlinear
systems described by a fuzzy bilinear model with parametric uncertainties. Based on the results in
this paper, interesting future studies may be extended the proposed techniques to uncertain T-S
fuzzy bilinear systems for discrete-time and to the robust ∞H fuzzy observer-based control
design for discrete-time uncertain T-S fuzzy bilinear systems.
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
15
REFERENCES
[1] T. Takagi & M. Sugeno, (1985) “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and
control”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Vol. SMC-15, no. 1, pp. 116-132.
[2] K. Tanaka, T. Ikeda, and H. O. Wang, (1998) “Fuzzy regulators and fuzzy observers: Relaxed
stability conditions and LMI-based designs”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy syst., Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 250-265.
[3] K. Tanaka & H. O. Wang (2001) Fuzzy control systems design and analysis: a linear matrix
inequality approach, New York: Wiley.
[4] M. Chadli & T.-M. Guerra, (2012) “LMI solution for robust static output feedback control of Takagi-
Sugeno fuzzy models”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1160-1165.
[5] E. Kim & H. Lee, (2000) “New approaches to relaxed quadratic stability condition of fuzzy control
systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 523-534.
[6] G. Feng & G. Chen, (2005) “Adaptive control of discrete-time chaotic systems: a fuzzy control
approach”, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 459-467.
[7] B. Chen, X. P. Lin, , C. Lin, S. C. Tong, (2008) “Observer-based stabilization of T-S fuzzy systems
with input delay”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 652-663.
[8] S. K. Nguang & P. Shi, (2008) “ fuzzy output feedback control design for nonlinear systems: an LMI
approach”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 331-340.
[9] J. Yoneyama, M. Nishikawa, H. Katayama, A. Ichikawa, (2000) “Output stabilization of Takagi-
Sugeno fuzzy systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 253-266.
[10] C.-H. Fang, Y.-S. Liu, S.-W. Kau, L. Hong, C.-H. Lee, (2006) “A new LMI-based approach to
relaxed quadratic stabilization of T-S fuzzy control systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems,
Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 386-397.
[11] T.M. Guerra & L. Vermeiren, (2004) “LMI-based relaxed nonquadratic stabilization conditions for
nonlinear systems in the Takagi-Sugeno’s form”, Automatica, Vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 823-829.
[12] K. Tanaka, T. Hori, H.O. Wang, (2003) “A multiple Lyapunov function approach to stabilization of
fuzzy control systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 582-589.
[13] H.-N. Wu & K.-Y. Cai, (2006) “ guaranteed cost fuzzy control design for discrete-time nonlinear
systems with parameter uncertainty”, Automatica, Vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1183-1188.
[14] S. Zhou, G. Feng, J. Lam, S. Xu, (2005) “Robust control for discrete-time fuzzy systems via basis-
dependent Lyapunov functions.”, Inf. Sci., Vol. 174, no. 3-4, pp. 197-217.
[15] H.J. Lee, J.B. Park, G. Chen, (2001) “Robust fuzzy control of nonlinear systems with parametric
uncertainties”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 369-379.
[16] C.-S Tseng, B.-S Chen and Y.-F Li, (2009) “Robust fuzzy observer-based fuzzy control design for
nonlinear systems with persistent bounded disturbances: A novel decoupled approach”, Fuzzy Sets
Syst., Vol. 160, no. 19, pp. 2824-2843.
[17] J.-C. Lo & M.-L. Lin, (2004) “Observer-based robust control for fuzzy systems using two-step
procedure”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 350-359.
[18] X. Liu & Q. Zhang, (2003) “New approaches to controller designs based on fuzzy observers for T-S
fuzzy systems via LMI”, Automatica, Vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1571-1582.
[19] B. Mansouri, N. Manamanni, K. Guelton, A. Kruszewski and T.M. Guerra, (2009) “Output feedback
LMI tracking control conditions with criterion for uncertain and disturbed T-S models”, Information
Sciences, Vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 446-457.
[20] J. Yoneyama, (2006) “Robust control analysis and synthesis for Takagi-Sugeno general uncertain
fuzzy systems: A novel decoupled approach”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 157, no. 16, pp. 2205-2223.
[21] S. Tong & H.-X. Li, (2002) “Observer-based robust fuzzy control of nonlinear systems with
parametric uncertainties”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 165-184.
[22] T.-H.S. Li & S.-H. Tsai, (2007) “T-S Fuzzy Bilinear Model and Fuzzy Controller Design for a Class
of Nonlinear Systems”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 494-506.
[23] T.-H.S. Li & S.-H. Tsai, (2008) “Robust fuzzy control for a class of uncertain discrete fuzzy bilinear
systems”, IEEE Trans. on system, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 510-526.
[24] S.-H. Tsai & T.-H.S. Li, (2009) “Robust fuzzy control of a class of fuzzy bilinear systems with time-
delay”, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, Vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 2028-2040.
[25] G. Zhang & M. Song, (2010) “Static output feedback control for discrete-time fuzzy bilinear system”,
J. Syst. Eng. Electron, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 296-299.
International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016
16
[26] S.-H. Tsai, (2011) “Robust control for Van de Vusse reactor via T-S fuzzy bilinear scheme”, Expert
Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 4935-4944.
[27] R. Takada, Y. Uchida and J. Yoneyama, (2013) “Output feedback control design with guaranteed cost
for fuzzy bilinear time-delay systems”, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 1303-
1318.
[28] T.-H.S. Li, S.-H. Tsai, and M.-Y. Hsiao, (2009) “Robust fuzzy control for a class of time-delay
fuzzy bilinear systems with an additive disturbance”, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numerical Simul., Vol. 10,
no. 3, pp. 315-322.
[29] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek (2015) Robust Estimation Design for Unknown Inputs Fuzzy
Bilinear Models: Application to Faults diagnosis, Springer book: Complex system modelling and
control through intelligent soft computations studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Vol. 319, pp.
655-685.
[30] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek, (2014) “Robust fault detection for fuzzy bilinear systems
via unknown input observer”, In Proc. 22th Medit. Conf. Contr. Aut., pp. 281-286.
[31] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek, (2013) “State Estimation for Unknown Input Fuzzy Bilinear
Systems: Application to Fault Diagnosis”, European Control Conference ECC, pp. 2465-2470.
[32] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli C. Mechmeche and N. B. Braiek, (2012) “Unknown Input Observer Design for
Fuzzy Bilinear System: an LMI Approach”, J. of Mathematical Problems in Engineering MPE, pp. 1-
21.
[33] J. Baek & M. Park, (2012) “Fuzzy bilinear state feedback control design based on T-S fuzzy bilinear
model for DC-DC converters”, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 710-720.
[34] S.-H. Tsai, (2012) “A Global Exponential Fuzzy Observer Design for time-Delay Takagi–Sugeno
Uncertain Discrete Fuzzy Bilinear Systems with Disturbance”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 20, no.
6, pp. 1063-1075.
[35] D. Saoudi, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2015) “Fault Tolerant Control for Uncertain Fuzzy Bilinear
Models”, Proc. of the IFAC Safeprocess'15, Vol. 48, no. 21, pp. 1256-1261.
[36] D. Saoudi, C. Mechmeche, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2012) “Robust residual generator design for
Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy bilinear system subject to unknown inputs”, Proc. of the IFAC Safeprocess'12,
pp. 1023-1028.
[37] D. Saoudi, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2014) “Fault Tolerant Control for Nonlinear Systems
Described by Fuzzy Bilinear Models”, International Conference on Electrical Engineering and
Control Applications ICEECA, pp. 1-6.
[38] J.-S. Chiou, F.-C. Kung, T.-H.S. Li, (2000) “Robust stabilization of a class of singularly perturbed
discrete bilinear systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1187-1191.
[39] S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, V. Balakrishnan, (1994) Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and
Control Theory, SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, University City Science
Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
[40] G. Shi, Y. Zou, C. Yang, (1992) “An algebraic approach to robust control via state feedback”,
System Control Letters, Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 365-370.

More Related Content

PDF
Fault detection based on novel fuzzy modelling
PDF
Stability and stabilization of discrete-time systems with time-delay via Lyap...
PDF
Ee35741744
PDF
Hierarchical algorithms of quasi linear ARX Neural Networks for Identificatio...
PDF
Isen 614 project presentation
PDF
Financial Time Series Analysis Based On Normalized Mutual Information Functions
PDF
Flatness Based Nonlinear Sensorless Control of Induction Motor Systems
PPTX
Week 16 controllability and observability june 1 final
Fault detection based on novel fuzzy modelling
Stability and stabilization of discrete-time systems with time-delay via Lyap...
Ee35741744
Hierarchical algorithms of quasi linear ARX Neural Networks for Identificatio...
Isen 614 project presentation
Financial Time Series Analysis Based On Normalized Mutual Information Functions
Flatness Based Nonlinear Sensorless Control of Induction Motor Systems
Week 16 controllability and observability june 1 final

What's hot (20)

PDF
At35257260
PDF
Db36619623
PDF
Discretizing of linear systems with time-delay Using method of Euler’s and Tu...
PDF
Model reduction of unstable systems based on balanced truncation algorithm
PDF
On the State Observer Based Stabilization of T-S Systems with Maximum Converg...
PDF
EFFECT OF TWO EXOSYSTEM STRUCTURES ON OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE RTAC SYSTEM
PDF
Controllability and observability
PDF
Cone crusher model identification using
PDF
solver (1)
PDF
Tutorial marzo2011 villen
PDF
A hybrid bacterial foraging and modified particle swarm optimization for mode...
PPTX
Types of models
PDF
A Detailed Comparative Study between Reduced Order Cumming Observer & Reduced...
PDF
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AND MODELING FOR INTERACTING AND NON-INTERACTING TANK S...
PDF
Design of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system
PDF
Modified Projective Synchronization of Chaotic Systems with Noise Disturbance,...
PDF
Dalius MAKACKAS, Regina MISEVIČIENĖ. Ekvivalenčių būsenų paieškos algoritmas ...
PDF
20 convex hull last 7
PDF
Implimenting_HJM
PDF
Control systems
At35257260
Db36619623
Discretizing of linear systems with time-delay Using method of Euler’s and Tu...
Model reduction of unstable systems based on balanced truncation algorithm
On the State Observer Based Stabilization of T-S Systems with Maximum Converg...
EFFECT OF TWO EXOSYSTEM STRUCTURES ON OUTPUT REGULATION OF THE RTAC SYSTEM
Controllability and observability
Cone crusher model identification using
solver (1)
Tutorial marzo2011 villen
A hybrid bacterial foraging and modified particle swarm optimization for mode...
Types of models
A Detailed Comparative Study between Reduced Order Cumming Observer & Reduced...
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AND MODELING FOR INTERACTING AND NON-INTERACTING TANK S...
Design of de-coupler for an interacting tanks system
Modified Projective Synchronization of Chaotic Systems with Noise Disturbance,...
Dalius MAKACKAS, Regina MISEVIČIENĖ. Ekvivalenčių būsenų paieškos algoritmas ...
20 convex hull last 7
Implimenting_HJM
Control systems
Ad

Viewers also liked (14)

TXT
1001 ten be trai
PDF
MODIFIED DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL FOR BLDC MOTOR DRIVES
PPT
Www.ebo.vn bao cao_ruou_ngot
TXT
Ky thuat nuoi chao mào
PPTX
Catalogo de celulares
PPT
Trac nghiem he noi tiet
PPT
Tiet 15 sản xuất ruou etylic tu ri duong
PPT
Tiet 15 nấu bia và lên men bia
PPT
Tiet 13 nuôi cấy nấm men và lên men dịch đường hóa
PPT
Bài giảng vsv nông nghiệp
PPT
Ky nang giang day
PPT
Tiet 2 giống vi sinh vật
PPT
Sinh ly dong vat on thi hsg quoc gia
PDF
OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES IN OPTIMAL INTEGRATED CONTROL, COMPUTATION AND COMMUN...
1001 ten be trai
MODIFIED DIRECT TORQUE CONTROL FOR BLDC MOTOR DRIVES
Www.ebo.vn bao cao_ruou_ngot
Ky thuat nuoi chao mào
Catalogo de celulares
Trac nghiem he noi tiet
Tiet 15 sản xuất ruou etylic tu ri duong
Tiet 15 nấu bia và lên men bia
Tiet 13 nuôi cấy nấm men và lên men dịch đường hóa
Bài giảng vsv nông nghiệp
Ky nang giang day
Tiet 2 giống vi sinh vật
Sinh ly dong vat on thi hsg quoc gia
OPTIMIZATION APPROACHES IN OPTIMAL INTEGRATED CONTROL, COMPUTATION AND COMMUN...
Ad

Similar to Controller Design Based On Fuzzy Observers For T-S Fuzzy Bilinear Models (20)

PDF
2-DOF BLOCK POLE PLACEMENT CONTROL APPLICATION TO:HAVE-DASH-IIBTT MISSILE
PDF
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
PDF
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
PDF
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
PDF
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
PDF
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
PDF
Hierarchical robust fuzzy sliding mode control for a class of simo under-actu...
PDF
Robust Exponential Stabilization for a Class of Uncertain Systems via a Singl...
PDF
Design of State Estimator for a Class of Generalized Chaotic Systems
PDF
Design Nonlinear Model Reference with Fuzzy Controller for Nonlinear SISO Sec...
PDF
Global stabilization of a class of nonlinear system based on reduced order st...
PDF
Piecewise Controller Design for Affine Fuzzy Systems
PDF
Piecewise controller design for affine fuzzy systems
PDF
On finite-time output feedback sliding mode control of an elastic multi-motor...
PDF
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AND MODELING FOR INTERACTING AND NON-INTERACTING TANK S...
PDF
Robust fault detection for switched positive linear systems with time varying...
PDF
A comparative study of nonlinear circle criterion based observer and H∞ obser...
PDF
Single Machine Power Network Load Frequency Control Using T-S Fuzzy Based Rob...
PDF
DYNAMICS, ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND EXTENDED SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC SYSTE...
PDF
DYNAMICS, ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND EXTENDED SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC SYSTE...
2-DOF BLOCK POLE PLACEMENT CONTROL APPLICATION TO:HAVE-DASH-IIBTT MISSILE
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
2-DOF Block Pole Placement Control Application To: Have-DASH-IIBITT Missile
Hierarchical robust fuzzy sliding mode control for a class of simo under-actu...
Robust Exponential Stabilization for a Class of Uncertain Systems via a Singl...
Design of State Estimator for a Class of Generalized Chaotic Systems
Design Nonlinear Model Reference with Fuzzy Controller for Nonlinear SISO Sec...
Global stabilization of a class of nonlinear system based on reduced order st...
Piecewise Controller Design for Affine Fuzzy Systems
Piecewise controller design for affine fuzzy systems
On finite-time output feedback sliding mode control of an elastic multi-motor...
SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION AND MODELING FOR INTERACTING AND NON-INTERACTING TANK S...
Robust fault detection for switched positive linear systems with time varying...
A comparative study of nonlinear circle criterion based observer and H∞ obser...
Single Machine Power Network Load Frequency Control Using T-S Fuzzy Based Rob...
DYNAMICS, ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND EXTENDED SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC SYSTE...
DYNAMICS, ADAPTIVE CONTROL AND EXTENDED SYNCHRONIZATION OF HYPERCHAOTIC SYSTE...

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
PDF
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
PDF
Well-logging-methods_new................
PDF
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
PPTX
web development for engineering and engineering
PPTX
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PPTX
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
PDF
Digital Logic Computer Design lecture notes
DOCX
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
PPTX
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
PDF
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
PDF
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
PPTX
Artificial Intelligence
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PDF
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
PPTX
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
PDF
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
PDF
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
UNIT-1 - COAL BASED THERMAL POWER PLANTS
Automation-in-Manufacturing-Chapter-Introduction.pdf
Well-logging-methods_new................
PPT on Performance Review to get promotions
web development for engineering and engineering
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
composite construction of structures.pdf
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
Digital Logic Computer Design lecture notes
ASol_English-Language-Literature-Set-1-27-02-2023-converted.docx
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
R24 SURVEYING LAB MANUAL for civil enggi
keyrequirementskkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
Artificial Intelligence
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
July 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in International Journal of Software Enginee...
Safety Seminar civil to be ensured for safe working.
Embodied AI: Ushering in the Next Era of Intelligent Systems
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf

Controller Design Based On Fuzzy Observers For T-S Fuzzy Bilinear Models

  • 1. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 DOI : 10.5121/ijctcm.2016.6201 1 CONTROLLER DESIGN BASED ON FUZZY OBSERVERS FOR T-S FUZZY BILINEAR MODELS Dhikra Saoudi LSA - Laboratoire des Systèmes Avancés, Polytechnic High School of Tunisia, University of Carthage, BP 743, 2078 La Marsa, Tunisia. ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the design of a fuzzy-observer-based control for a class of nonlinear systems with bilinear terms. The class of systems considered is the Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy bilinear model. A new procedure to design the observer-based fuzzy controller for this class of systems is proposed. The aim is to design the fuzzy controller and the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee that the error between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero. By using the Lyapunov function, sufficient conditions are derived such that the closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable. Moreover, sufficient conditions for controller design based on state estimation for robust stabilization of T- S FBS with parametric uncertainties is proposed. The observer and controller gains are obtained by solving some linear matrix inequalities (LMIs). An example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach. Keywords T-S fuzzy bilinear model, Fuzzy observer-based control, Lyapunov function, Parametric uncertainty, LMI. 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, the stability analysis and the synthesis of controllers/observers for nonlinear systems have been the subject of many research works. In recent years, the stability analysis and the synthesis of controllers/observers for nonlinear systems are still open problems owing to their nature complexity and have been the subject of many research works. It is well known that Takagi-Sugeno (T-S) fuzzy model is a modelling method [1] that can represent or approximate a large class of nonlinear systems by a set of local linear dynamics [2]. Various results have been devoted to the stability analysis and stabilization of T-S fuzzy systems [3]-[7]. These results use different techniques such as the system parameters to be known but in reality the parameters of the system can be either uncertain or time-dependent. Moreover, the problem of stabilization remains an important issue in the controller designs of uncertain nonlinear systems [8], [9]. It is also necessary to consider the robust stability of uncertain T-S fuzzy models in order to guarantee both stability and the robustness with respect to the latter. The study of robustness in fuzzy model-based control has been studied widely in the literature for nonlinear systems. For example, fuzzy model-based control for T-S fuzzy models has been studied in [10]-[12] and for T-S fuzzy models with parametric uncertainties has been given in [13]-[15]. Moreover, it is noted that all of the aforementioned assume that the system states are measured, which is not true in many control systems and real applications. For this reason, observer-based fuzzy controllers were considered
  • 2. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 2 in many researches. In [16]-[18], the authors have studied the controller designs based on fuzzy observers for T-S fuzzy systems. Nonetheless, in [19]-[21], the authors have proposed sufficient design conditions for robust stabilization of T-S fuzzy models with parametric uncertainties based on state estimation. In recent years, the fuzzy bilinear systems (FBS) based on the T-S fuzzy model with bilinear rule consequence were considered in [22]-[24]. It is proved in these papers that often nonlinear behaviours can be approximated by T-S bilinear multimodel description. This modeling method is based on the bilinearization of the nonlinear system around some operating points and using adequate weighting functions. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. Some topics of control are extended to T-S fuzzy bilinear model (FBM). For example; in [22] proposed a fuzzy controller to stabilize the FBS and also for the fuzzy bilinear systems with parametric uncertainties. In [23], [26], the authors studied the robust ∞H control problem for T-S FBS. In [25], the authors developed a static output feedback controller for T-S discrete fuzzy bilinear systems (DFBS). Furthermore, the stabilization problems of T-S FBS and T-S DFBS with time-delay have been proposed in [27],[28]. Moreover, some studies have investigated the observer problem for T–S fuzzy bilinear systems [29]-[34] and application to fault diagnosis and fault tolerant control, have been examined for this class of systems in [35]-[37]. Unfortunately, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the problem of an observer-based control for T-S fuzzy bilinear models and a robust stabilization for uncertain T-S fuzzy models. In this paper, an observer-based control design for uncertain nonlinear systems in order to guarantee the closed-loop stability is proposed. The T-S FBM is employed to represent a nonlinear system with parametric uncertainties. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. The goal is to design the fuzzy controller and the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee that the error between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero. By employing the Lyapunov function, design conditions are derived. The gains of the observer and the controller are obtained by solving some linear matrix inequalities. So, this paper brings some results for the observer- based control design dedicated to fuzzy bilinear models and uncertain fuzzy bilinear models. This paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the considered structure of the T-S fuzzy bilinear system is presented. In Section 3, the problem of observer-based control for the fuzzy bilinear systems is developed. In section 4, the method of controller design based on state estimation for robust stabilization of T-S FBS with parametric uncertainties is proposed. an illustrative example is provided to show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in Section 5. Finally, Section 6 concludes the paper. 2. T-S FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL REPRESENTATION In a fuzzy modelling framework, the fuzzy bilinear models based on the T-S fuzzy model with bilinear rule consequence were an extension of the T-S fuzzy ordinary model. It is proved that often nonlinear behaviours can be approximated by T-S fuzzy bilinear model description. This technique is based on the bilinearization of the nonlinear system around some operating points and using adequate weighting functions. This kind of T-S fuzzy model is especially suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. Then, the fuzzy bilinear model is described by the following fuzzy if-then rules: 1 1: if ( ) is and and ( ) isLi i g igR t F t Fξ ξ
  • 3. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 3 then ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t) ( ) ( ) = + +  = & i i ix t A x t Bu t N x t y t Cx t (1) where iR denotes the th i fuzzy rule $ { }1, ,∀ = Li r , r is the number of if-then rules, ( )i tξ are the premise variables which can be measurable or not measurable, and ( (t))ij jF ξ are fuzzy set. ( )∈ℜn x t is the state vector, ( )∈ℜu t is the control input, and ( )∈ℜp y t is the system output. The matrices , , ,i i iA B N C are known matrices. Then, the overall FBM can be described as follows: ( ) 1 ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t) ( ) ( ) =  = + +   = ∑& r i i i i i x t h t A x t Bu t N x t y t Cx t ξ (2) where (.)ih verify the following properties: { }1 ( ( )) 1 1,2, , 0 ( ( )) 1 =  = ∀ ∈  ≤ ≤ ∑ L r i i i h t i r h t ξ ξ (3) Remark 1: Matrices , ,i i iA B N and C can be obtained by using the polytopic transformation [2]. The advantage of this method is in one hand to lead to a bilinear transformation of the nonlinear model without any approximation error, and in another hand to reduce the number of local models compared to other methods [22]. 3. CONTROL OF THE FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL In this section, we will develop the observer-based control problem for the fuzzy bilinear systems. Thereafter, we will propose sufficient conditions that guarantees the closed-loop stability by using a Lyapunov function-based design approach. The goal is to design the fuzzy controller and the fuzzy observer of the augmented system separately in order to guarantee that the error between the state and its estimation converges faster to zero. Many studies consider that all the state variables of the system are available. However in practice this assumption often does not hold. Hence, we need to define a fuzzy observer to estimate the states and make an analysis of the error system, from which we provides a design method of a fuzzy observer for the fuzzy bilinear system (2). Then, the proposed structure of the fuzzy bilinear observer has the following form:. Then, the proposed structure of the fuzzy bilinear observer has the following form: ( )( ) 1 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( )u(t) ( ) ( ) ˆ ˆ( ) ( ) =  = + + + ϒ −   = ∑& r i i i i i i x t h t A x t Bu t N x t y t y t y t Cx t ξ (4)
  • 4. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 4 where ˆ( )x t is the estimated state vector of ( )x t , and , 1, ,ϒ = Li i r are observer parameters to be determined. In this paper, it is assumed that all of the premise variables do not depend on the state variables estimated by a fuzzy observer. Following the design concept in [38], the fuzzy control law for FBM is formulated as follows: ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 ˆ( ) ( ) ( ) ˆ ˆ1 ( ) ( ) ˆ( ) sin ( ) ˆˆ( ) ( )cos ( ) = = = = + = = ∑ ∑ ∑ r i i T T i i i r i i i r i i i i D x t u t h t x t D D x t h t t h t D x t t ρ ξ ξ ρ θ ξ ρ θ (5) where: ˆ( ) 1ˆ ˆsin ( ) , cos ( ) ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ1 ( ) ( ) 1 ( ) ( ) ˆ , 2 2 = = + +   ∈ −    i i iT T T T i i i i i D x t t t x t D D x t x t D D x t θ θ π π θ ρ is a given scalar, and 1 , 1, ,r× ∈ℜ = Ln iD i are vectors to be determined. Let us define the state estimation error: ( ) ( ) ( )ˆ= −e t x t x t (6) Then, one can obtain the fuzzy observer error dynamics from (2), (4), and (5): ( ) ( ) ( )( )1 1 ˆ( ) ( ) ( ) + sin ( ) ( ) = = = + ϒ∑∑& r r i j i i i j i j e t h t h t A C N t e tξ ξ ρ θ (7) Let us define the augmented system containing both the fuzzy controller and observer    TT T x e which dynamics is given by the augmented system: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )     =        & & x t x t A t e t e t ξ (8)
  • 5. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 5 where the matrices ( )( )A tξ are given by: ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) = = = ∑∑ r r i j ij i j A t h t h t Aξ ξ ξ with: ˆ ˆ ˆsin cos cos ˆ0 sin  + + =   + ϒ +   i i j i j j i j j ij i i i j A N B D B D A A C N ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ The goal is to design the observer-based fuzzy controller (5) for the fuzzy bilinear system (2) such that the closed-loop augmented system (8) becomes globally asymptotically stable. Therefore, the main result is then propounded in the following theorem. Theorem 1: If there exist symmetric positive definite matrices 1P and 2P , matrices ,i iW V and positive scalars 0 , 0> >ε ρ such that LMIs (9) and (10) are satisfied, then the augmented system described by (8) is asymptotically stable 1 , 1∀ = ∀ =L Li r j r 1 1 1 * * * * * * * 00 * * 0 0 * 0 0 0  +   −    <−   −   −  T i i i i j T i A P PA N P I BV I I I B I ρ ε (9) 2 2 2 1 * * * * * 0 0 * 0 0 −  + + +   −  <  −   −   T T T i i i i i j P A A P WC C W P N I I I D I ρ ε (10) The gains of the observer and the state feedback control law are given by: 1 1 − =i iD V P (11) 1 2 − ϒ =i iP W (12) Proof: In order to ensure the global, asymptotic stability, a new procedure for designing the observer-based fuzzy controller (5) for the fuzzy bilinear system (2) is proposed such that the closed-loop system (8) becomes asymptotically robust stable by using a Lyapunov function-based design approach. Then from (8), the sufficient conditions must be verified: ( )0 , , 0∃ = > = + <T D T ij ij ij ijQ Q M A Q A Q QA (13)
  • 6. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 6 Where 11 22 0 0   =     Q Q Q (14) Let us define ( ) 1 2 , = +D D D ij ij ij ijM A Q M M (15) with 11 21 1 2 12 22 0 0 , 0 0     = =           ij ijD D ij ij ij ij D D M M D D (16) ( ) ( ) ( ) 11 11 11 11 11 11 11 12 22 22 22 22 22 22 21 22 22 22 ˆ ˆsin sin ˆ ˆcos cos ˆ ˆsin sin ˆcos ˆcos = + + + + + = + + + + ϒ + ϒ = = T T ij i i i j i j T i j j i j j T T ij i i i j i j T i i ij i j j T ij i j j D AQ Q A N Q Q N Q B D B D Q D AQ Q A N Q Q N CQ Q C D B D Q D Q B D ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ (17) In order to investigate the stability criteria, the following lemma will be also used [39]. Lemma 1: For any matrices A and B with appropriate dimensions, the following property holds for any positive scalar λ : 1− + ≤ +T T T T A B B A A A B Bλ λ (18) Let 11 1=Q P and 1 22 2 − =Q P . From (16) and by using the separation Lemma (1) [40], one obtains: ( ) 1 2 0 , 0   ≤      ijD ij ij ij R M A Q R (19) In order to verify (13), we must have: 1 2 0 0 0   <     ij ij R R (20)
  • 7. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 7 Which implies : 1 2 0 0 < < ij ij R R (21) where: ( ) ( ) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆsin sin cos ˆcos ˆ ˆsin sin − − − − − − − − − = + + + + + + = + + + + ϒ + ϒ + T T ij i i i j i j i j j T T i j j i i T T ij i i i j i j T T i i j j R A P PA N P PN B D P P B D B B R A P P A N P P N CP P C P D D P ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ε ρ θ ρ θ ε From the following variable changes 1=i iV D P , 2= ϒi iW P , by using Lemma (1) and using the Schur’s complement [39] to (21) results in (9) and (10). This completes the proof of the theorem. 4. ROBUST CONTROL OF THE FUZZY BILINEAR MODEL WITH UNCERTAINTIES In this section, we want to design the robust control of the FBM. The objective is to consider parametric uncertainties in the system for modelling the behaviour of complex nonlinear dynamic systems in order to design of a stabilizing control law, based on state estimation. The nonlinear system is modeled as a T-S fuzzy bilinear model. Then, the dynamic equation of the fuzzy bilinear system can be formulated in the following form: ( ) ( ) ( )1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) =   + ∆ + + ∆ =    + + ∆    = ∑& r i i i i i i i i A A x t B B u t x t h t N N x t u t y t Cx t ξ (22) The parameter uncertainties considered here are norm-bounded and presented by the form [ ] [ ]1 2 3∆ ∆ ∆ =i i i i i i i iA B N M F E E E (23) where 1 2 3, , ,i i i iM E E E are known real constant matrices of appropriate dimensions, and iF is an unknown matrix function satisfying ( ) ( ) ≤T i iF t F t I , in which I is the identity matrix of appropriate dimension. The feedback controller and the state of fuzzy bilinear observer for T-S fuzzy bilinear model with parametric uncertainties (22) is the same as that for (2). In order to examine the robustness of the fuzzy controller (5), the augmented system is represented as follows: ( )ˆ( ) ( ) ( )=& a aX t A t X tξ (24) where the matrices ( )ˆ ( )A tξ and the augmented vector ( )aX t are respectively given by:
  • 8. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 8 ( ) ( ) ( ) 1 1 ˆ ˆ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) = = =   =     ∑∑ r r i j ij i j a A t h t h t A x t X t e t ξ ξ ξ with 11 12 21 22 ˆ Ξ Ξ  =  Ξ Ξ  ijA ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 11 12 21 22 ˆ ˆsin cos ˆcos ˆ ˆsin cos ˆ ˆsin cos Ξ = + ∆ + + ∆ + + ∆ Ξ = + ∆ Ξ = − ∆ + ∆ + ∆ Ξ = + + ϒ − ∆ i i i i j i i j j i i j j i i j i j j i i j i i j j A A N N B B D B B D A N B D A N C B D ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ The objective of this section is to seek a fuzzy observer-based controller of the form (5) such that the closed-loop fuzzy augmented system (24) is globally asymptotically stable. Therefore, we have a result that is summarized in the following theorem. Theorem 2: If there exist symmetric positive definite matrices 1P and 2P , matrices ,i iW V and positive scalars 0 , 0> >ε ρ such that LMIs (25) and (26) are satisfied, then the augmented system described by (24) is asymptotically stable 1 , 1∀ = ∀ =L Li r j r ( ) 1 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * * * * * * * * 0 0 * * * * * * * 0 0 0 * * * * * * 0 0 0 0 * * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 * * * * 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − − − Π   −  −  −  −  −  −   + −   −  −  −  i i j i T i j i j T i i i j E P I E V I E P I M I V I E V I M I N P I BV I I I ε ε ε ρ ε ε ε ρ ε ρ 0        <         (25)
  • 9. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 9 ( ) 2 1 2 3 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * 0 * * * * * * * 0 0 * * * * * * 0 0 0 * * * * * 00 0 0 0 * * * * 0 0 0 0 0 * * * 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 − − Π   −   −   −   −   <−   −    + −    −   −   i i j i T i T i i j T i i E I E D I E I B P I M P I E D I M P I P N I I I ε ε ε ρ ε ρ ε ε ρ ε ρ (26) where : 1 1 1 2 2 2,Π = + Π = + + +T T T T i i i i i iA P PA P A A P WC C W The gains of the observer and the state feedback control law are given by: 1 1 − =i iD V P (27) 1 2 − ϒ =i iP W (28) Proof: To prove the stability of the closed-loop for the augmented system (24), the sufficient conditions must be verified: ( )ˆ ˆ ˆˆ0 , , 0∃ = > = + <T D T ij ij ij ijQ Q M A Q A Q QA (29) Where 11 22 0 0   =     Q Q Q (30) Let us define ( ) 1 2ˆˆ ˆ ˆ, = +D D D ij ij ij ijM A Q M M (31) where 1 11 12 1 2 21 222 ˆ 0 ˆ ˆ, ˆ0    ∆ ∆ = =    ∆ ∆      ij ij ijD D ij ij ij ijij D M M D (32)
  • 10. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 10 ( ) ( ) 1 11 11 11 11 11 11 2 22 22 22 22 22 22 11 11 11 11 11 11 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆˆ sin sin cos cos ˆ ˆˆ sin sin ˆ ˆsin sin = + + + + + = + + + + ϒ + ϒ ∆ = ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ TT T ij i i i j i j i j j i j j TT T ij i i i j i j i i T T ij i i i j i j D AQ Q A N Q Q N Q B D B D Q D AQ Q A N Q Q N CQ Q C AQ Q A N Q Q N Q B ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) 11 12 22 22 22 11 11 21 22 22 22 11 11 22 ˆ ˆcos cos ˆ ˆsin cos ˆ ˆcos cos ˆ ˆsin cos ˆ ˆcos cos + ∆ ∆ = − ∆ − ∆ − ∆ + ∆ + ∆ = −∆ − ∆ − ∆ + + ∆ ∆ T i j j i j j TT T ij i i j i j j i j j i j j ij i i j i j j T T i j j i j j ij D B D Q Q A Q N Q B D B D Q B D Q AQ N Q B D Q Q B D Q B D θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ( )22 22 ˆ ˆcos cos= − ∆ − ∆ T i j j i j jB D Q Q B Dρ θ ρ θ (33) The equation 2ˆ D ijM can be reformulated as follows 2 1 2 3ˆ = Ψ + Ψ + ΨD ij ij ij ijM (34) with: 12 12 11 1 21 2 3 21 21 22 1 2 0 0 0 , , 0 0 0      Ψ Ψ ∆ Ψ = Ψ = Ψ =      Ψ Ψ ∆           ij ij ij ij ij ij ij ij ij (35) ( ) ( ) ( ) 12 1 22 22 22 21 1 22 22 22 12 2 11 11 21 2 11 11 ˆ ˆsin cos ˆ ˆsin cos ˆ ˆcos cos ˆ ˆ= cos cos Ψ = − ∆ − ∆ − ∆ Ψ = −∆ − ∆ − ∆ Ψ = ∆ + Ψ + ∆ TT T ij i i j i j j ij i i j i j j ij i j j i j j T T ij i j j i j j Q A Q N Q B D AQ N Q B D Q B D Q B D Q Q B D Q B D ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ ρ θ (36) Let 11 1=Q P and 1 22 2 − =Q P . Using the uncertainties structure and by using the separation Lemma (1) [40], one obtains: 1 2 2 ˆ 0 ˆ ˆ0   ≤      ijD ij ij T M T (37)
  • 11. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 11 where: ( )1 2 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 2 ˆ 1 2 ˆ − − − − − − − − − − − − − = + + + + + + + = + + T T T T T ij i i i i j j j i i j T T T T T i i i i i i j i i j T i i T T T T ij i i i i j i i j T M F F M PD D P PD E E D P M F F M PE E P PD E E D P PE E P T P E E P P E E P P D E E D P ρ ε ε ε ε ρ ε ε ε ε ε ε ( )1 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 2− − − − + + + + + T T T T T i i i i i i i i i i T T j i i j B B M F F M M FF M P D E E D P ε ρ ε ρ ρ ε ε (38) From (31), (33) and (37), we have: ( ) 1 1 2 2 ˆ ˆ 0 ˆˆ , ˆ ˆ0  + ≤   +   ij ijD ij ij ij ij D T M A P D T (39) In order to verify (29), we must have: 1 2 ˆ 0 0 ˆ0   <     ij ij R R (40) where: 1 1 1 2 2 2 ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ = + = + ij ij ij ij ij ij R D T R D T (41) Which implies : 1 2 ˆ 0 ˆ 0 < < ij ij R R (42) Using the following variable changes 1=i iV D P , 2= ϒi iW P , and using the Schur’s complement [39] to (42) results in (25) and (26). This completes the proof of the theorem. To illustrate the theoretical development and the design algorithm, numerical example is proposed in the following section. 5. SIMULATION EXAMPLE In this section, an example is given to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed design conditions. Consider a nonlinear system represented by a T-S fuzzy bilinear model with uncertainties of two local models:
  • 12. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 12 ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 1 ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ( )) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) =   + ∆ + + ∆ =    + + ∆    = ∑& i i i i i i i i A A x t B B u t x t h t N N x t u t y t Cx t ξ The numerical values of those parameters are defined by: [ ] 1 1 1 2 2 2 0 0.8 1 1 0 , , 1.5 3.2 1 0 1 0 0.5 2 1 0 , , 1.5 3.4 1 0 1 1 0 −      = = =     − − − −      −      = = =     − − − −      = A B N A B N C Uncertainties are also defined by the following matrices: 1 11 21 31 2 12 22 32 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 , , , 0 0.1 0 0.3 0.5 0 0 0.1 0 0 0.5 1 0 0 , , , 0 0.1 0 0.6 0.5 0 0         = = = =                        = = = =                M E E E M E E E The weighting functions are defined by: ( ) ( ) ( ) 2 1 1 2 1 51( ) exp , ( ) 1 ( ) 2 2  +  = = −      x h x t h x t h x t In order to design robust observer-based controller for this uncertain T-S fuzzy bilinear system, we solve LMIs of theorem 2. So, we obtain the following controller and observer gain matrices respectively with 0.7=ρ : [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] 2 2 1.94 0.18 , 1.35 0.08 , 7.74 80.83 , 7.79 82.25 = − − = − − ϒ = − − ϒ = − − i T T i D D The simulation results are shown in figures (1)-(3). Figures (1) and (2) show respectively the trajectories of states 1( )x t and 2 ( )x t of the considered system and their corresponding observer variables. One can see that the estimated states can closely track the original states despite of the presence of norm-bounded parametric uncertainties. Figure (3) shows the evolution of the control signal.
  • 13. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 13 Figure 1. The trajectories of the state 1( )x t and its estimate . Figure 2. The trajectories of the state 2 ( )x t and its estimate .
  • 14. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 14 Figure 3. Control signal ( )u t 6. CONCLUSION In this paper, we have developed the fuzzy observer-based control problem and the robust stabilization for continuous nonlinear systems. Such design is based on a T-S fuzzy bilinear model representation, particularly suitable for a nonlinear system with a bilinear term. Design conditions for an observer-based controller have been formulated and solved using a LMI framework. The gains of the control and observer can be obtained by solving this set of LMIs. Simulation results have checked the effectiveness of our approach in controlling nonlinear systems described by a fuzzy bilinear model with parametric uncertainties. Based on the results in this paper, interesting future studies may be extended the proposed techniques to uncertain T-S fuzzy bilinear systems for discrete-time and to the robust ∞H fuzzy observer-based control design for discrete-time uncertain T-S fuzzy bilinear systems.
  • 15. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 15 REFERENCES [1] T. Takagi & M. Sugeno, (1985) “Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control”, IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern., Vol. SMC-15, no. 1, pp. 116-132. [2] K. Tanaka, T. Ikeda, and H. O. Wang, (1998) “Fuzzy regulators and fuzzy observers: Relaxed stability conditions and LMI-based designs”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy syst., Vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 250-265. [3] K. Tanaka & H. O. Wang (2001) Fuzzy control systems design and analysis: a linear matrix inequality approach, New York: Wiley. [4] M. Chadli & T.-M. Guerra, (2012) “LMI solution for robust static output feedback control of Takagi- Sugeno fuzzy models”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1160-1165. [5] E. Kim & H. Lee, (2000) “New approaches to relaxed quadratic stability condition of fuzzy control systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 523-534. [6] G. Feng & G. Chen, (2005) “Adaptive control of discrete-time chaotic systems: a fuzzy control approach”, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, Vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 459-467. [7] B. Chen, X. P. Lin, , C. Lin, S. C. Tong, (2008) “Observer-based stabilization of T-S fuzzy systems with input delay”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 652-663. [8] S. K. Nguang & P. Shi, (2008) “ fuzzy output feedback control design for nonlinear systems: an LMI approach”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 331-340. [9] J. Yoneyama, M. Nishikawa, H. Katayama, A. Ichikawa, (2000) “Output stabilization of Takagi- Sugeno fuzzy systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 253-266. [10] C.-H. Fang, Y.-S. Liu, S.-W. Kau, L. Hong, C.-H. Lee, (2006) “A new LMI-based approach to relaxed quadratic stabilization of T-S fuzzy control systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 386-397. [11] T.M. Guerra & L. Vermeiren, (2004) “LMI-based relaxed nonquadratic stabilization conditions for nonlinear systems in the Takagi-Sugeno’s form”, Automatica, Vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 823-829. [12] K. Tanaka, T. Hori, H.O. Wang, (2003) “A multiple Lyapunov function approach to stabilization of fuzzy control systems”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 582-589. [13] H.-N. Wu & K.-Y. Cai, (2006) “ guaranteed cost fuzzy control design for discrete-time nonlinear systems with parameter uncertainty”, Automatica, Vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1183-1188. [14] S. Zhou, G. Feng, J. Lam, S. Xu, (2005) “Robust control for discrete-time fuzzy systems via basis- dependent Lyapunov functions.”, Inf. Sci., Vol. 174, no. 3-4, pp. 197-217. [15] H.J. Lee, J.B. Park, G. Chen, (2001) “Robust fuzzy control of nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 369-379. [16] C.-S Tseng, B.-S Chen and Y.-F Li, (2009) “Robust fuzzy observer-based fuzzy control design for nonlinear systems with persistent bounded disturbances: A novel decoupled approach”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 160, no. 19, pp. 2824-2843. [17] J.-C. Lo & M.-L. Lin, (2004) “Observer-based robust control for fuzzy systems using two-step procedure”, IEEE Transaction on Fuzzy Systems, Vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 350-359. [18] X. Liu & Q. Zhang, (2003) “New approaches to controller designs based on fuzzy observers for T-S fuzzy systems via LMI”, Automatica, Vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1571-1582. [19] B. Mansouri, N. Manamanni, K. Guelton, A. Kruszewski and T.M. Guerra, (2009) “Output feedback LMI tracking control conditions with criterion for uncertain and disturbed T-S models”, Information Sciences, Vol. 179, no. 4, pp. 446-457. [20] J. Yoneyama, (2006) “Robust control analysis and synthesis for Takagi-Sugeno general uncertain fuzzy systems: A novel decoupled approach”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 157, no. 16, pp. 2205-2223. [21] S. Tong & H.-X. Li, (2002) “Observer-based robust fuzzy control of nonlinear systems with parametric uncertainties”, Fuzzy Sets Syst., Vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 165-184. [22] T.-H.S. Li & S.-H. Tsai, (2007) “T-S Fuzzy Bilinear Model and Fuzzy Controller Design for a Class of Nonlinear Systems”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 494-506. [23] T.-H.S. Li & S.-H. Tsai, (2008) “Robust fuzzy control for a class of uncertain discrete fuzzy bilinear systems”, IEEE Trans. on system, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 510-526. [24] S.-H. Tsai & T.-H.S. Li, (2009) “Robust fuzzy control of a class of fuzzy bilinear systems with time- delay”, Chaos, Solitons Fractals, Vol. 39, no. 15, pp. 2028-2040. [25] G. Zhang & M. Song, (2010) “Static output feedback control for discrete-time fuzzy bilinear system”, J. Syst. Eng. Electron, Vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 296-299.
  • 16. International Journal of Control Theory and Computer Modeling (IJCTCM) Vol.6, No.1/2, April 2016 16 [26] S.-H. Tsai, (2011) “Robust control for Van de Vusse reactor via T-S fuzzy bilinear scheme”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 4935-4944. [27] R. Takada, Y. Uchida and J. Yoneyama, (2013) “Output feedback control design with guaranteed cost for fuzzy bilinear time-delay systems”, Applied Mathematical Sciences, Vol. 7, no. 27, pp. 1303- 1318. [28] T.-H.S. Li, S.-H. Tsai, and M.-Y. Hsiao, (2009) “Robust fuzzy control for a class of time-delay fuzzy bilinear systems with an additive disturbance”, Int. J. Nonlinear Sci. Numerical Simul., Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 315-322. [29] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek (2015) Robust Estimation Design for Unknown Inputs Fuzzy Bilinear Models: Application to Faults diagnosis, Springer book: Complex system modelling and control through intelligent soft computations studies in fuzziness and soft computing, Vol. 319, pp. 655-685. [30] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek, (2014) “Robust fault detection for fuzzy bilinear systems via unknown input observer”, In Proc. 22th Medit. Conf. Contr. Aut., pp. 281-286. [31] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli and N. B. Braiek, (2013) “State Estimation for Unknown Input Fuzzy Bilinear Systems: Application to Fault Diagnosis”, European Control Conference ECC, pp. 2465-2470. [32] D. Saoudi , M. Chadli C. Mechmeche and N. B. Braiek, (2012) “Unknown Input Observer Design for Fuzzy Bilinear System: an LMI Approach”, J. of Mathematical Problems in Engineering MPE, pp. 1- 21. [33] J. Baek & M. Park, (2012) “Fuzzy bilinear state feedback control design based on T-S fuzzy bilinear model for DC-DC converters”, Electrical Power and Energy Systems, Vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 710-720. [34] S.-H. Tsai, (2012) “A Global Exponential Fuzzy Observer Design for time-Delay Takagi–Sugeno Uncertain Discrete Fuzzy Bilinear Systems with Disturbance”, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst., Vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1063-1075. [35] D. Saoudi, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2015) “Fault Tolerant Control for Uncertain Fuzzy Bilinear Models”, Proc. of the IFAC Safeprocess'15, Vol. 48, no. 21, pp. 1256-1261. [36] D. Saoudi, C. Mechmeche, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2012) “Robust residual generator design for Takagi-Sugeno fuzzy bilinear system subject to unknown inputs”, Proc. of the IFAC Safeprocess'12, pp. 1023-1028. [37] D. Saoudi, M. Chadli and N. B. Braeik, (2014) “Fault Tolerant Control for Nonlinear Systems Described by Fuzzy Bilinear Models”, International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Control Applications ICEECA, pp. 1-6. [38] J.-S. Chiou, F.-C. Kung, T.-H.S. Li, (2000) “Robust stabilization of a class of singularly perturbed discrete bilinear systems”, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, Vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1187-1191. [39] S. Boyd, L. El Ghaoui, E. Feron, V. Balakrishnan, (1994) Linear Matrix Inequalities in System and Control Theory, SIAM, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, University City Science Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. [40] G. Shi, Y. Zou, C. Yang, (1992) “An algebraic approach to robust control via state feedback”, System Control Letters, Vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 365-370.