SlideShare a Scribd company logo
WHITE PAPER


                           Conventional vs. Robotic Palletizing
                           (Is Conventional Palletizing Dead?)
                           By Pat O’Connor, Product Manager, Palletizing Systems, Intelligrated

                           Conventional automatic palletizers have been available since the 1950’s. In the 1990’s,
                           gantry and then jointed-arm robots made significant inroads in palletizing, leading many
                           to conclude that the conventional palletizer’s days were numbered. Rather than getting
                           immersed in ambiguous statistics and marketing buzz words like “flexible” or “fixed
                           automation,” this paper will look at the specific applications that favor each technology to
                           determine if the future of palletizing is exclusively robotic.

                           Applications that Favor Robotics
                           Articulated-arm robotic palletizers have a “wow” factor, but may be a legitimate solution for
                           high-SKU, lower-speed operations as well as applications where the product shape demands
                           the precision of a robotic arm, such as bags and pails.

                           Low-Speed Multi-Lines – In order to handle more than one product at a time, a conventional
                           palletizer needs to accumulate layers or loads of like product on an upstream conveying
                           system, then feed them into a palletizer that automatically changes patterns. A palletizing
                           robot can potentially simplify multi-line palletizing by eliminating the upstream conveyor
                           system. Several loads can be built inside the robot work envelope, allowing the arm to work
                           on all of the loads at the same time while storing the partial loads in cubic form at floor level.
                           This is a very effective concept for lower-speed lines, generally under 15 cases per minute,
                           per line.

                           Bag Palletizing – Jointed-arm robots dominate the bag palletizing business. Clam shell
                           tooling allows the robot to pick the bag from a roller conveyor and place it on the load
                           without disturbing the contents of the bag, resulting in a straight and square load.
                           Furthermore, the bag being dropped into place allows the robot to achieve higher rates
                           than case palletizing – frequently above 20 cycles per minute. Robots have the ability
                           to work in confined spaces and dusty environments, adding to their appeal in the bag
                           palletizing business.
                           Pail Palletizing – Most pails are constructed so that the bottom of the pail nests inside the lid
                           of the pail below when stacked on a pallet. Robots can precisely place the pails so that each
                           layer nests inside the previous layer, making pail palletizing an ideal robotic application.

                           Display Loads – Display loads frequently require four-way, labels-out orienting, multiple
                           different sheets within a single load, special dunnage, etc. These requirements can be
                           addressed with a conventional palletizer, but the cost may increase to the point where
                           robotics is a more practical solution.

                           Applications that Favor Conventional Palletizing
                           Conventional automatic palletizers are capable of very high speeds, which is why they
                           continue to be routinely specified for high-speed manufacturing lines found in the food,
                           beverage and consumer goods industries. Surprisingly, they can also be more flexible than
                           robots in regards to product packaging and stacking patterns.

                           High-Speed – 200 cases per minute and 20 layers per minute are possible on inline,
                           continuous-motion palletizers. Robots are intermittent motion machines, and it would take
                           many of them working together to achieve these speeds. For high-speed manufacturing
                           operations, there is simply no other alternative that can get the job done.


   www.intelligrated.com                                                                                               1
WHITE PAPER

                           Reduced Product Packaging – Robots pick and place the product, while conventional
                           palletizers convey the product into position. Because they never have to pick up the
                           product, conventional palletizers are more tolerant of packaging changes. Cases, trays,
                           film bundles, poly sacks, etc., can all be handled on the same conventional palletizer.

                           Complex Pattern Forming – Conventional palletizers handle each case individually,
                           and therefore pattern changes have a relatively small impact on rate. In order to get
                           reasonable throughput from a limited cycle rate, robots are generally handling multiple
                           cases at a time. If case sizes or stacking patterns change, dramatic rate reductions can
                           result. For example, changing from a nine-block, column-stacked pattern to a nine-
                           block pinwheel pattern will frequently result in a 50 percent rate reduction on a robotic
                           system.

                           Conventional and Robotic Hybrids
                           These palletizers combine articulated-arm robots with conventional palletizers, yielding
                           a solution that provides the flexibility and repeatability of robotic arms with the speed
                           and reliability of the conventional palletizer.

                           Conventional Pattern Forming with Robotic Layer Deposit – The first common hybrid
                           solution used the forming section of a conventional palletizer to form the layer and a
                           large robot to deposit the layer. This solution offered few advantages since the robot
                           was a complex and slow device in comparison to the conventional palletizer.

                           Robotic Pattern Forming with Conventional Layer Deposit – This concept seems to
                           combine the best of both technologies for higher-rate applications. Robots are used to
                           precisely turn and position the cases, while conventional technology is used to square
                           and deposit the layers. Because the robot does not have to lift the product, it can
                           operate at more than 40 cycles per minute on a wide range of package types. Because
                           cases do not have to be positioned in fixed-lane locations, pattern flexibility is improved
                           and new pattern creation is simplified. The cost for this concept is still higher than
                           conventional high-speed palletizers, but the added expense can be justified in some
                           applications.

                           Conclusions
                           1. Conventional palletizers will continue to provide a high-speed palletizing solution
                           for years to come. Robots cannot duplicate the continuous motion operation of high-
                           speed palletizers or the flexibility of the palletizer when handling complex patterns and
                           multiple package types. Additionally, the palletizer’s low cost and flexibility will ensure
                           their ongoing popularity.

                           2. Robots already dominate low-speed, multi-line and bag palletizing applications.
                           Other applications that benefit from robotic precision, and the robot’s high-tech image,
                           will ensure their continued growth.

                           3. Hybrid applications, using the robot as a component of a machine, will experience
                           dramatic growth. Currently, robots are seen manipulating cases inside conventional
                           palletizers. As mass production lowers robot costs, more applications, like tier sheet
                           inserting, will be performed robotically.

                           In short, no single technology will dominate palletizing for the foreseeable future.

                           For more information, contact Intelligrated by e-mail at info@intelligrated.com,
                           by phone at 866.936.7300, or visit www.intelligrated.com.




   www.intelligrated.com                                                                                                 2

More Related Content

PDF
EnviroChemie - Wastewater treatment solutions for the pharmaceutical and life...
PDF
Solutions for Packaging and Food Industry
PDF
Strapping Head for Steel strapping nabd
DOCX
Ii Edition Sealing Technologies For F F S Packaging Systems May 24 25 20...
PDF
Coursera principlescomputing1 2015
PPT
Environment Graphs July 2010
PDF
GBM formula
EnviroChemie - Wastewater treatment solutions for the pharmaceutical and life...
Solutions for Packaging and Food Industry
Strapping Head for Steel strapping nabd
Ii Edition Sealing Technologies For F F S Packaging Systems May 24 25 20...
Coursera principlescomputing1 2015
Environment Graphs July 2010
GBM formula

Viewers also liked (7)

PDF
Sustainability in packaging
PDF
Design of Different Types of Corrugated Board Packages Using Finite Element T...
PDF
Meraki Company And Product Overview
PDF
Workshop1 astri
PPTX
Pallet packing
PPTX
Mobile Marketing Case Studies
Sustainability in packaging
Design of Different Types of Corrugated Board Packages Using Finite Element T...
Meraki Company And Product Overview
Workshop1 astri
Pallet packing
Mobile Marketing Case Studies
Ad

Similar to Conventional Palletizing is Dead? (20)

PDF
Int robotic white_paper_
PPTX
Robots
PPT
Palletizing Systems Manufacturer
PDF
Innovative Random Depalletization Solution | CMES Robotics
PPTX
Robotics in pharmaceutical industry
PPTX
IRMHS.pptx
PDF
Robot applications
PPTX
State of robotics in logistics
PPTX
Robot Technology
PDF
Combi ergopack with robot sell sheet
PPTX
Robotics in operations management for mbant
PDF
acr-white-paper_5_0.pdf
PPTX
Material handling robots
PPTX
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
PPTX
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
PPTX
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
PPTX
Robotic Automation in warehouse
PDF
Beyond Automation: The New Era of Robotics in Business
PDF
4-Manufacturing industry-31-05-2023 (1).pdf
PDF
4-Manufacturing industry-31-05-2023.pdf
Int robotic white_paper_
Robots
Palletizing Systems Manufacturer
Innovative Random Depalletization Solution | CMES Robotics
Robotics in pharmaceutical industry
IRMHS.pptx
Robot applications
State of robotics in logistics
Robot Technology
Combi ergopack with robot sell sheet
Robotics in operations management for mbant
acr-white-paper_5_0.pdf
Material handling robots
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
Cooperative and Swarm Robotics Cooperative Manipulation
Robotic Automation in warehouse
Beyond Automation: The New Era of Robotics in Business
4-Manufacturing industry-31-05-2023 (1).pdf
4-Manufacturing industry-31-05-2023.pdf
Ad

More from intelligrated (16)

PDF
Int order fulfillment_whitepaper_final approved
PDF
Int working smarter_whitepaper
PDF
Intelligrated Pick to Light Case Study
PDF
Int mc kesson_casestudy
PDF
Int kirklands case_study
PDF
Int kelly moore_casestudy
PDF
Int jtm case_study_0
PDF
Int hhg case_study_0
PDF
Int hershey case_study_0
PDF
Int freds case_study
PDF
Int dsi case_study_0
PDF
Int dicks case_study_1
PDF
Int cristalia case_study_0
PDF
Int boulevard brew_casestudy
PDF
Int biglots case_study_0
PDF
Avon Material Handling Preventative Maintenance Case Study
Int order fulfillment_whitepaper_final approved
Int working smarter_whitepaper
Intelligrated Pick to Light Case Study
Int mc kesson_casestudy
Int kirklands case_study
Int kelly moore_casestudy
Int jtm case_study_0
Int hhg case_study_0
Int hershey case_study_0
Int freds case_study
Int dsi case_study_0
Int dicks case_study_1
Int cristalia case_study_0
Int boulevard brew_casestudy
Int biglots case_study_0
Avon Material Handling Preventative Maintenance Case Study

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
PPT
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
PPTX
svnfcksanfskjcsnvvjknsnvsdscnsncxasxa saccacxsax
PPTX
Astra-Investor- business Presentation (1).pptx
PDF
Technical Architecture - Chainsys dataZap
PPTX
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
PDF
Comments on Crystal Cloud and Energy Star.pdf
PDF
TyAnn Osborn: A Visionary Leader Shaping Corporate Workforce Dynamics
PDF
NEW - FEES STRUCTURES (01-july-2024).pdf
PPTX
Negotiation and Persuasion Skills: A Shrewd Person's Perspective
PPTX
3. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE UNIIT 3^..pptx
PPTX
Sales & Distribution Management , LOGISTICS, Distribution, Sales Managers
PDF
Charisse Litchman: A Maverick Making Neurological Care More Accessible
PDF
Cours de Système d'information about ERP.pdf
PDF
NewBase 12 August 2025 Energy News issue - 1812 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
PDF
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Aug 2025.pdf
PPTX
2025 Product Deck V1.0.pptxCATALOGTCLCIA
PDF
Outsourced Audit & Assurance in USA Why Globus Finanza is Your Trusted Choice
PDF
Digital Marketing & E-commerce Certificate Glossary.pdf.................
PDF
Module 3 - Functions of the Supervisor - Part 1 - Student Resource (1).pdf
NISM Series V-A MFD Workbook v December 2024.khhhjtgvwevoypdnew one must use ...
Lecture 3344;;,,(,(((((((((((((((((((((((
svnfcksanfskjcsnvvjknsnvsdscnsncxasxa saccacxsax
Astra-Investor- business Presentation (1).pptx
Technical Architecture - Chainsys dataZap
Slide gioi thieu VietinBank Quy 2 - 2025
Comments on Crystal Cloud and Energy Star.pdf
TyAnn Osborn: A Visionary Leader Shaping Corporate Workforce Dynamics
NEW - FEES STRUCTURES (01-july-2024).pdf
Negotiation and Persuasion Skills: A Shrewd Person's Perspective
3. HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE UNIIT 3^..pptx
Sales & Distribution Management , LOGISTICS, Distribution, Sales Managers
Charisse Litchman: A Maverick Making Neurological Care More Accessible
Cours de Système d'information about ERP.pdf
NewBase 12 August 2025 Energy News issue - 1812 by Khaled Al Awadi_compresse...
1911 Gold Corporate Presentation Aug 2025.pdf
2025 Product Deck V1.0.pptxCATALOGTCLCIA
Outsourced Audit & Assurance in USA Why Globus Finanza is Your Trusted Choice
Digital Marketing & E-commerce Certificate Glossary.pdf.................
Module 3 - Functions of the Supervisor - Part 1 - Student Resource (1).pdf

Conventional Palletizing is Dead?

  • 1. WHITE PAPER Conventional vs. Robotic Palletizing (Is Conventional Palletizing Dead?) By Pat O’Connor, Product Manager, Palletizing Systems, Intelligrated Conventional automatic palletizers have been available since the 1950’s. In the 1990’s, gantry and then jointed-arm robots made significant inroads in palletizing, leading many to conclude that the conventional palletizer’s days were numbered. Rather than getting immersed in ambiguous statistics and marketing buzz words like “flexible” or “fixed automation,” this paper will look at the specific applications that favor each technology to determine if the future of palletizing is exclusively robotic. Applications that Favor Robotics Articulated-arm robotic palletizers have a “wow” factor, but may be a legitimate solution for high-SKU, lower-speed operations as well as applications where the product shape demands the precision of a robotic arm, such as bags and pails. Low-Speed Multi-Lines – In order to handle more than one product at a time, a conventional palletizer needs to accumulate layers or loads of like product on an upstream conveying system, then feed them into a palletizer that automatically changes patterns. A palletizing robot can potentially simplify multi-line palletizing by eliminating the upstream conveyor system. Several loads can be built inside the robot work envelope, allowing the arm to work on all of the loads at the same time while storing the partial loads in cubic form at floor level. This is a very effective concept for lower-speed lines, generally under 15 cases per minute, per line. Bag Palletizing – Jointed-arm robots dominate the bag palletizing business. Clam shell tooling allows the robot to pick the bag from a roller conveyor and place it on the load without disturbing the contents of the bag, resulting in a straight and square load. Furthermore, the bag being dropped into place allows the robot to achieve higher rates than case palletizing – frequently above 20 cycles per minute. Robots have the ability to work in confined spaces and dusty environments, adding to their appeal in the bag palletizing business. Pail Palletizing – Most pails are constructed so that the bottom of the pail nests inside the lid of the pail below when stacked on a pallet. Robots can precisely place the pails so that each layer nests inside the previous layer, making pail palletizing an ideal robotic application. Display Loads – Display loads frequently require four-way, labels-out orienting, multiple different sheets within a single load, special dunnage, etc. These requirements can be addressed with a conventional palletizer, but the cost may increase to the point where robotics is a more practical solution. Applications that Favor Conventional Palletizing Conventional automatic palletizers are capable of very high speeds, which is why they continue to be routinely specified for high-speed manufacturing lines found in the food, beverage and consumer goods industries. Surprisingly, they can also be more flexible than robots in regards to product packaging and stacking patterns. High-Speed – 200 cases per minute and 20 layers per minute are possible on inline, continuous-motion palletizers. Robots are intermittent motion machines, and it would take many of them working together to achieve these speeds. For high-speed manufacturing operations, there is simply no other alternative that can get the job done. www.intelligrated.com 1
  • 2. WHITE PAPER Reduced Product Packaging – Robots pick and place the product, while conventional palletizers convey the product into position. Because they never have to pick up the product, conventional palletizers are more tolerant of packaging changes. Cases, trays, film bundles, poly sacks, etc., can all be handled on the same conventional palletizer. Complex Pattern Forming – Conventional palletizers handle each case individually, and therefore pattern changes have a relatively small impact on rate. In order to get reasonable throughput from a limited cycle rate, robots are generally handling multiple cases at a time. If case sizes or stacking patterns change, dramatic rate reductions can result. For example, changing from a nine-block, column-stacked pattern to a nine- block pinwheel pattern will frequently result in a 50 percent rate reduction on a robotic system. Conventional and Robotic Hybrids These palletizers combine articulated-arm robots with conventional palletizers, yielding a solution that provides the flexibility and repeatability of robotic arms with the speed and reliability of the conventional palletizer. Conventional Pattern Forming with Robotic Layer Deposit – The first common hybrid solution used the forming section of a conventional palletizer to form the layer and a large robot to deposit the layer. This solution offered few advantages since the robot was a complex and slow device in comparison to the conventional palletizer. Robotic Pattern Forming with Conventional Layer Deposit – This concept seems to combine the best of both technologies for higher-rate applications. Robots are used to precisely turn and position the cases, while conventional technology is used to square and deposit the layers. Because the robot does not have to lift the product, it can operate at more than 40 cycles per minute on a wide range of package types. Because cases do not have to be positioned in fixed-lane locations, pattern flexibility is improved and new pattern creation is simplified. The cost for this concept is still higher than conventional high-speed palletizers, but the added expense can be justified in some applications. Conclusions 1. Conventional palletizers will continue to provide a high-speed palletizing solution for years to come. Robots cannot duplicate the continuous motion operation of high- speed palletizers or the flexibility of the palletizer when handling complex patterns and multiple package types. Additionally, the palletizer’s low cost and flexibility will ensure their ongoing popularity. 2. Robots already dominate low-speed, multi-line and bag palletizing applications. Other applications that benefit from robotic precision, and the robot’s high-tech image, will ensure their continued growth. 3. Hybrid applications, using the robot as a component of a machine, will experience dramatic growth. Currently, robots are seen manipulating cases inside conventional palletizers. As mass production lowers robot costs, more applications, like tier sheet inserting, will be performed robotically. In short, no single technology will dominate palletizing for the foreseeable future. For more information, contact Intelligrated by e-mail at info@intelligrated.com, by phone at 866.936.7300, or visit www.intelligrated.com. www.intelligrated.com 2