SlideShare a Scribd company logo
The Statistical  Engineering Process Simple Understanding Listen  to the customer Observe  the failure Measure  the contrast Converge  to the major influence Confirm  the major influence Implement  control 165 Complex Problems Statistical Engineering
Measure the Relationship How can we measure the contrast between a desirable Y-response …. And an undesirable Y-response……… “ An attribute Measurement can be used to describe a problem. A variable Measurement is usually required to solve it. How else can you tell if you are headed in the right direction?” jdg 168
Relationship of Responses Linear Sensory Scoring 166 This is done… After the “Y-Response” has been identified After a 30 piece initial contrasting samples have been identified  with a customer “Threshold” sample for  “Y-Response”  To transform an Attribute Measurement into An Integer Range For Initial measurement of contrast to get problem started How … Remember the Attribute Methodology Decide if any sample is Better or Worse than a standard Create a Linear scale with 6 increments of Resolution Relationship of Linear Sensory Methodology for Transformation: Collect 30 samples of  Y-Response including  Best  sample of the Day Worst sample of the Day Customer Threshold sample Place Best, Threshold and Worst samples in Line Identify Y-Response lower mid point sample between Best  and Threshold Identify Y-Response upper mid point sample between Threshold and Worst Place all reference samples in a line form Best to Worst  and  assign values 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 from Best to Worst Collect 30 samples with a full range of one day’s variability Select a sample and compare it to the Threshold 2.5 If Better, compare it to the 1.5. If Worse compare it to the  3.5. Continue comparison until comparison reverses result.  Scoring for sample will be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 based on last  comparison made before result reversed (see illustration). 9)    Repeat steps 7) and 8) for all remaining 29 samples.
Linear Sensor Scoring System 176 Linear Transformation values 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5  (6 distinct increments of resolution) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Linear Sensor Scoring Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 7 Step 8 2.5 3.5 4.5 1.5 0.5 Threshold Lower Mid Upper Mid Best Worst 1 st  Decision 2 nd  Decision 2 nd  Decision 3 rd  Decision 3 rd  Decision Better Worse Decision Time Sample
 R Linear Sensory Measurement System  (Verification of Discrimination Ratio) 176 Verify Measurement System: (  M /   R = Repeatability Ratio – Same Operator)  M /   R = Reproducibility Ratio – 2x Operators) If 1 st  Measurement vs 2 nd  Measurement: Do not Differ by more than 1 point Accept Repeatability 1/6 = 17% Error max. Differ by more than 1 point Reject Measurement System 2/6 = 34% Error min. Plot 1 st  vs 2 nd  Measurement (30 samples) Calculate   M/  R . 1 st  Linear Score 2 nd  Linear Score Step 1 Plot  1 st  Linear Score vs 2 nd  Linear score
Using a Linear Scoring Options: Limited discrete variable data analyses (only good for initial contrast comparison with low resolutions) Capability Study (see below illustration) 2 sample t-tests ( difference in averages and/or variation) Distribution analyses (normal vs bi-modal vs others) Linear Sensor Scoring System Analyses
Take 2 contrasting Y-Respone samples and perform a preliminary stress vs strain analyses to understand the appropriate transformation type with good resolution potential. Decide on Transformation Method Stress Constant – Measure Strain Strain Constant – Measure Force Breaking strength If you use force that exceeds the Elastic Limit (distortion of original past the yield strength),you will need to measure the same event with 2 different measuring systems to perform a measuring system analyses. Examples: Cracked housings, UTS of materials, fatigue strength, etc. Forming Operations, joining operations, destructive testing, etc. Timed events, such as machine cycle, operator cycle, etc. Test protocol needs to be defined, to reduce unnecessary variation. Write out a procedure that can be forllowed by anyone gathering data. Measurement system validation  using a scatter plot can be performed for the event (using 2 measurements of each event – repeatability) or to validate the test protocol (using 2 operator  independent of each other – reproducibility)  Rules - Use of  “Energy Aggravation”   ( for Measurement System Transformation) 177
3 Energy Transformations #1 1) Elastic Limit 1 2 UTS 3) Failure Strength 3 3 Transformation Applications #2 Pull to  Constant Stress Measure Force Pull with  Constant Force Measure Strain 3) Failure Strength =  Breaking  Strength
Examples: Gap between Material and surround: Constant Stress   Identified as Best Tool Develop Test Protocol for non destructive pull test using constant force within  Elastic limit of system Using a wedge gage, repeat test protocol for 2 nd  measurement of each sample set up for   M analyses  Create representative sampling plan Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications Plastic  Limit 1 lb. Wedge Gage Gap Within Elastic  Limit 
Examples: Accumulation of Dirt over Time (e.g for Paint Line Contamination): Constant Strain  (Exposure over a constant Time) Identified as Best Tool Develop  Test Protocol  for using constant force such as exposure (or Time) to measure displacement (or accumulation of dirt) Using a piece of paper, repeat test protocol for 2 nd  measurement of each location for   M analyses  Create representative sampling plan  Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications Location #1 Location #3 Location #4 Location #2
Examples: Egg Shell robustness issue: Failure Strength Identified as Best Tool Develop Test Protocol for  destructive method Place egg on scale and add Point source load onto egg measure force 2x for each destruction event (E.g. Known weight vs Scale) for   M analyses  Create representative sampling plan Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications
Energy Transformation  Measurement System  Scatter Plot  R  M  R  M X 100% = % Repeatability Pass :   if = / or Less Than 17% Improve Measurement System : if Over 17%

More Related Content

PPT
Comparison and evaluation of alternative designs
PPTX
Model Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis
PPT
Errors in measurement
PPT
Comparison statisticalsignificancetestir
PPTX
Logistic regression analysis
PPTX
Error analytical
PPTX
Error in chemical analysis
PPTX
The uncertainty of measurements
Comparison and evaluation of alternative designs
Model Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis
Errors in measurement
Comparison statisticalsignificancetestir
Logistic regression analysis
Error analytical
Error in chemical analysis
The uncertainty of measurements

What's hot (20)

PPTX
Measurement Uncertainty
PPTX
Uncertainity in Measurement
PPTX
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
PPT
1 measurement and error
PPT
Dignostic Tests of Applied Economics
PDF
Measurement Errors and Standards
PPTX
Errors in chemical analysis
PPT
Measurement
PPTX
Measurement and error
PDF
Kappa statistics
PPT
Diagnostic Test of Applied Economics
PPTX
errors of measurement and systematic errors
PPTX
presentation of factorial experiment 3*2
PPTX
Factorial Design
PPT
Analytical chemistry lecture 3
PPTX
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS HOW TO DO A T-TEST ON MS-EXCEL AND SPSS
PPTX
Measurement theory.
PPTX
G11 ia design
PPT
Accuracy, Precision Measurement
PPTX
Multivariate analysis
Measurement Uncertainty
Uncertainity in Measurement
Diploma sem 2 applied science physics-unit 1-chap 2 error s
1 measurement and error
Dignostic Tests of Applied Economics
Measurement Errors and Standards
Errors in chemical analysis
Measurement
Measurement and error
Kappa statistics
Diagnostic Test of Applied Economics
errors of measurement and systematic errors
presentation of factorial experiment 3*2
Factorial Design
Analytical chemistry lecture 3
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS HOW TO DO A T-TEST ON MS-EXCEL AND SPSS
Measurement theory.
G11 ia design
Accuracy, Precision Measurement
Multivariate analysis
Ad

Viewers also liked (12)

PPT
Measurement and scales
PPTX
Measurement and scaling techniques
PDF
A Review on Usability Features for Designing Electronic Health Records
PPTX
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SCALES/INSTRUMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY
PPTX
personality achievement interest test
PPTX
Descriptive analysis for sensory evaluation
PPTX
Sensory evaluation of food products
PPT
Measurement scales
PPTX
Research Methodology - types of scale
PPT
Measurement Scale
PPTX
measurement and scaling
PPT
D8 and d9 personality test development 10 2007-posting
Measurement and scales
Measurement and scaling techniques
A Review on Usability Features for Designing Electronic Health Records
DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION OF SCALES/INSTRUMENTS IN PSYCHIATRY
personality achievement interest test
Descriptive analysis for sensory evaluation
Sensory evaluation of food products
Measurement scales
Research Methodology - types of scale
Measurement Scale
measurement and scaling
D8 and d9 personality test development 10 2007-posting
Ad

Similar to Converting Measurement Systems From Attribute (20)

PDF
report
PPT
MSA (GR&R)
PPT
Msa presentation
PDF
FuelInjectorNozzles-EN.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
PPTX
Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
PPT
02training material for msa
PPTX
02trainingmaterialformsa (1) 111030062223-phpapp02
PPT
Practical Work In Biology
PDF
Machine Learning.pdf
PPT
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
PPTX
Statistical analysis and experimental designs
PPT
090528 Miller Process Forensics Talk @ Asq
PPTX
MSA R&R for training in manufacturing industry
PPT
604_multiplee.ppt
PPT
Rodebaugh sixsigma[1]
PPT
MSA with Six Sigma explained with best practices.ppt
PPT
Measurement system analysis Presentation.ppt
PPT
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
PPT
Stochastic Process
PPTX
SBP_RM_parent) block in the chain. Timestamp: It is a system that verifie...
report
MSA (GR&R)
Msa presentation
FuelInjectorNozzles-EN.pdf.coredownload.inline.pdf
Measurement System Analysis (MSA)
02training material for msa
02trainingmaterialformsa (1) 111030062223-phpapp02
Practical Work In Biology
Machine Learning.pdf
six-sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory.ppt
Statistical analysis and experimental designs
090528 Miller Process Forensics Talk @ Asq
MSA R&R for training in manufacturing industry
604_multiplee.ppt
Rodebaugh sixsigma[1]
MSA with Six Sigma explained with best practices.ppt
Measurement system analysis Presentation.ppt
Six sigma-in-measurement-systems-evaluating-the-hidden-factory (2)
Stochastic Process
SBP_RM_parent) block in the chain. Timestamp: It is a system that verifie...

Converting Measurement Systems From Attribute

  • 1. The Statistical Engineering Process Simple Understanding Listen to the customer Observe the failure Measure the contrast Converge to the major influence Confirm the major influence Implement control 165 Complex Problems Statistical Engineering
  • 2. Measure the Relationship How can we measure the contrast between a desirable Y-response …. And an undesirable Y-response……… “ An attribute Measurement can be used to describe a problem. A variable Measurement is usually required to solve it. How else can you tell if you are headed in the right direction?” jdg 168
  • 3. Relationship of Responses Linear Sensory Scoring 166 This is done… After the “Y-Response” has been identified After a 30 piece initial contrasting samples have been identified with a customer “Threshold” sample for “Y-Response” To transform an Attribute Measurement into An Integer Range For Initial measurement of contrast to get problem started How … Remember the Attribute Methodology Decide if any sample is Better or Worse than a standard Create a Linear scale with 6 increments of Resolution Relationship of Linear Sensory Methodology for Transformation: Collect 30 samples of Y-Response including Best sample of the Day Worst sample of the Day Customer Threshold sample Place Best, Threshold and Worst samples in Line Identify Y-Response lower mid point sample between Best and Threshold Identify Y-Response upper mid point sample between Threshold and Worst Place all reference samples in a line form Best to Worst and assign values 0.5, 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 4.5 from Best to Worst Collect 30 samples with a full range of one day’s variability Select a sample and compare it to the Threshold 2.5 If Better, compare it to the 1.5. If Worse compare it to the 3.5. Continue comparison until comparison reverses result. Scoring for sample will be 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 based on last comparison made before result reversed (see illustration). 9) Repeat steps 7) and 8) for all remaining 29 samples.
  • 4. Linear Sensor Scoring System 176 Linear Transformation values 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 (6 distinct increments of resolution) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Linear Sensor Scoring Step 2 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Step 4 Step 7 Step 8 2.5 3.5 4.5 1.5 0.5 Threshold Lower Mid Upper Mid Best Worst 1 st Decision 2 nd Decision 2 nd Decision 3 rd Decision 3 rd Decision Better Worse Decision Time Sample
  • 5.  R Linear Sensory Measurement System (Verification of Discrimination Ratio) 176 Verify Measurement System: (  M /  R = Repeatability Ratio – Same Operator)  M /  R = Reproducibility Ratio – 2x Operators) If 1 st Measurement vs 2 nd Measurement: Do not Differ by more than 1 point Accept Repeatability 1/6 = 17% Error max. Differ by more than 1 point Reject Measurement System 2/6 = 34% Error min. Plot 1 st vs 2 nd Measurement (30 samples) Calculate  M/  R . 1 st Linear Score 2 nd Linear Score Step 1 Plot 1 st Linear Score vs 2 nd Linear score
  • 6. Using a Linear Scoring Options: Limited discrete variable data analyses (only good for initial contrast comparison with low resolutions) Capability Study (see below illustration) 2 sample t-tests ( difference in averages and/or variation) Distribution analyses (normal vs bi-modal vs others) Linear Sensor Scoring System Analyses
  • 7. Take 2 contrasting Y-Respone samples and perform a preliminary stress vs strain analyses to understand the appropriate transformation type with good resolution potential. Decide on Transformation Method Stress Constant – Measure Strain Strain Constant – Measure Force Breaking strength If you use force that exceeds the Elastic Limit (distortion of original past the yield strength),you will need to measure the same event with 2 different measuring systems to perform a measuring system analyses. Examples: Cracked housings, UTS of materials, fatigue strength, etc. Forming Operations, joining operations, destructive testing, etc. Timed events, such as machine cycle, operator cycle, etc. Test protocol needs to be defined, to reduce unnecessary variation. Write out a procedure that can be forllowed by anyone gathering data. Measurement system validation using a scatter plot can be performed for the event (using 2 measurements of each event – repeatability) or to validate the test protocol (using 2 operator independent of each other – reproducibility) Rules - Use of “Energy Aggravation” ( for Measurement System Transformation) 177
  • 8. 3 Energy Transformations #1 1) Elastic Limit 1 2 UTS 3) Failure Strength 3 3 Transformation Applications #2 Pull to Constant Stress Measure Force Pull with Constant Force Measure Strain 3) Failure Strength = Breaking Strength
  • 9. Examples: Gap between Material and surround: Constant Stress Identified as Best Tool Develop Test Protocol for non destructive pull test using constant force within Elastic limit of system Using a wedge gage, repeat test protocol for 2 nd measurement of each sample set up for  M analyses Create representative sampling plan Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications Plastic Limit 1 lb. Wedge Gage Gap Within Elastic Limit 
  • 10. Examples: Accumulation of Dirt over Time (e.g for Paint Line Contamination): Constant Strain (Exposure over a constant Time) Identified as Best Tool Develop Test Protocol for using constant force such as exposure (or Time) to measure displacement (or accumulation of dirt) Using a piece of paper, repeat test protocol for 2 nd measurement of each location for  M analyses Create representative sampling plan Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications Location #1 Location #3 Location #4 Location #2
  • 11. Examples: Egg Shell robustness issue: Failure Strength Identified as Best Tool Develop Test Protocol for destructive method Place egg on scale and add Point source load onto egg measure force 2x for each destruction event (E.g. Known weight vs Scale) for  M analyses Create representative sampling plan Run 30 piece Capability Study Identify contrast for analyses phase Use Multi-vari to separate w/pc, pc/pc, t/t groups How to apply the logic: 3 Transformation Applications
  • 12. Energy Transformation Measurement System Scatter Plot  R  M  R  M X 100% = % Repeatability Pass : if = / or Less Than 17% Improve Measurement System : if Over 17%