![Strategy to mobilise investment in the renovation of buildings
[art. 4]
Central government buildings: 3% of the total floor area to be
renovated each year [art. 5]
Promote energy audits and Energy Management Systems (EN
ISO 50001) [art. 8]
“Member States shall promote the availability to all final
customers of high quality energy audits which are cost-
effective”
The EE Directive
Main measures](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/2-150925081904-lva1-app6891/85/Data-collection-and-monitoring-12-320.jpg)
![16
Number of measures on EnMS
Energy management
systems & SEAPs
Expected annual savings in 2020
[GWh/year] associated with
measures on EnMS
127 SEAPs contain at least one measure on
Energy Management Systems](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/2-150925081904-lva1-app6891/85/Data-collection-and-monitoring-16-320.jpg)
Data collection and monitoring
- 1. www.jrc.ec.europa.eu Serving society Stimulating innovation Supporting legislation The Covenant of Mayors: Data collection and monitoring 16 September 2015 50000&1 SEAPs webinar: Integrating Energy Management and Sustainable Action Plans: focus on data challenges Tiago Serrenho European Commission – Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy and Transport
- 2. 1. The Joint Research Centre and its role in the Covenant of Mayors 2. The Sustainable Energy Action Plan process 3. The EED ISO 50001, and CoM 4. 4. Data collection and Data Quality 5. Some Considerations Outline
- 3. 1. The Joint Research Centre and its role in the Covenant
- 4. JRC - Robust Science for Policy Making As a Directorate-General of the European Commission, the JRC provides customer-driven scientific and technical support to Community policy making Supporting citizen’s security, health and environmental protection, safety of food and chemicals, alternative energies, nuclear safety, econometrics, prospective technologies… About the JRC
- 5. Scientific-technical support to the development, implementation and monitoring of the CoM Development of the guidebook “How to develop a Sustainable Energy Action Plan (SEAP)” Monitoring of the CoM implementation, including the development of a specific template & instructions for signatories Evaluation of submitted SEAPs, with feedback to Covenant cities Operation of the technical helpdesk service The role of the JRC in the CoM The team: Paolo Bertoldi (IET), Andreea Iancu (IES), Brigitte Koffi (IES) Albana Kona (IET), Giulia Melica (IET), Silvia Rivas (IET), Paolo Zancanella (IET), Tiago Serrenho (IET)
- 6. 54 COUNTRIES 6 300 signatories 198 million citizens An unprecedented success… Covenant EU 28 EU Member States + EEA Countries Covenant East ENP countries of the Eastern Partnership and Central Asian countries. i.e. Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan. Covenant South Maghreb and Mashreq Countries
- 7. 2. The SEAP process
- 8. 8 The Covenant of Mayors Mayors commit to go beyond EU energy and climate objectives at least 20% CO2 reduction in their respective territories by 2020 Define a Baseline Emission Inventory (BEI) Prepare a Sustainable Energy Action Plan (SEAP) Implement their Action Plan and report periodically on progress Involve citizens and other stakeholders Adapt city structures and allocate sufficient resources Encourage other cities to join Voluntary initiative launched by DG ENERGY in 2008 to support local authorities in the sustainable energy development and the fight against climate change
- 9. The adhesion to the CoM initiates a process within the local authority The SEAP process
- 10. Guiding principles of the CoM approach • Scientific soundness → knowledge of starting point (BEI) • Territorial approach • Focus on FINAL energy consumption: In Buildings, equipment/facilities (and industries): → Municipal sector (exemplary role of the local authority) → Residential sector → Tertiary sector Transport Actions on Energy Efficiency and implementation of Renewable Energies
- 11. 3. The EED ISO 50001, and CoM
- 12. Strategy to mobilise investment in the renovation of buildings [art. 4] Central government buildings: 3% of the total floor area to be renovated each year [art. 5] Promote energy audits and Energy Management Systems (EN ISO 50001) [art. 8] “Member States shall promote the availability to all final customers of high quality energy audits which are cost- effective” The EE Directive Main measures
- 13. 13 ISO 50001 and CoM Definition of Boundaries Top Management involvement Energy Management Team Communication of EnMS (internal and external) Energy Planning (SEAP) ENERGY REVIEW (BEI)
- 14. 14 ISO 50001 and CoM
- 15. 15 Tot no. of measures on energy audits: 750 Energy audits & SEAPs Expected annual savings in 2020 associated with measures on energy audits (1014.4 GWh/year) 545 SEAPs contain at least one measure on energy audits
- 16. 16 Number of measures on EnMS Energy management systems & SEAPs Expected annual savings in 2020 [GWh/year] associated with measures on EnMS 127 SEAPs contain at least one measure on Energy Management Systems
- 17. 4. Data collection and Data Quality
- 18. Bottom-Up versus Top-Down approaches Ideally a full Bottom-Up approach should be followed Top-Down approaches might not give an accurate picture of the municipality Will the Monitoring Emission Inventories capture the results of local actions? CO2
- 19. CoM IEA database EUROSTAT database Time series One year inventory Complete time series Complete time series Data collection Mostly bottom- up inventories (completed with national/regional averages when data at local level are not available) Top-down, national averages Top-down, national averages Geographical Distribution Administrative boundaries of the signatory Worldwide coverage EU28 and other European countries Emission factors IPCC default emission factors or Local Factors Standard IPCC default emission factors Country specific emission factors Databases
- 20. 20 CHALLENGES IN DATA COLLECTION Structure of national/regional statistical data Sweden (Y) (t CO2) Municipal Buildings, equipment/ facilities Tertiary Buildings, equipment/ facilities Residential Buildings, equipment/ facilities Public lighting Industries (non ETS) Municipal Fleet Public transport Private and Commercial transport CoM 1. Activity sectors
- 21. 21 An example of a German signatory with this problem… DataResidential buildings DataDataData Data
- 22. 2222 2. Energy carriers reporting: e.g. Central Statistics bureau - Sweden CHALLENGES IN DATA COLLECTION Structure of national/regional statistical data Diesel Gasoline Liquid Fossil Fuels 3. Privacy/secrecy issues Different reporting schemes, responding to different needs, exist… → Signatories may lack resources to comply with them all
- 23. The Baseline Emission Inventory (BEI) A prerequisite to SEAP elaboration: the BEI quantifies the amount of CO2 emitted due to energy consumption in the municipality’s territory, and will thus help select the appropriate actions Example: Castelldefelds (Spain) Share of emissions per sector 5% 2% 21% 37% 28% 7% Primary sector Industrial sector Tertiary sector Transport sector Residential sector Waste management sector Three sectors represent 86% of the emissions of the city
- 24. The Monitoring Emission Inventory (MEI) An instrument to measure the impact of the SEAP actions: the BEI shows where the local authority is at the beginning. The successive MEIs will follow the same methods and principles of the BEI and will show the progress towards the objective. Example: Sunderland, UK Every 2 years CoM signatories have to report (qualitatively) on the implementation of their actions. Every 4 years it is mandatory for signatories to submit an Monitoring Emission Inventory (MEI). Importance of reliable Energy Consumption data!
- 25. The Monitoring Emission Inventory (MEI)
- 26. Focus: A simple important concept: final energy consumption Reporting is divided in four main sectors: Final energy consumption in buildings, equipment/facilities and industries Final energy consumption in transport Other emission sources not related to energy consumption (e.g. waste, wastewater…) Local electricity generation Not mandatory Indirectly considered, if included in SEAP Focus of the Covenant
- 27. 27 Insights on In-depth analysis report (JRC, to be published) In-depth study of 25 selected SEAPs Sample covering the full spectra of the initiative Understand main strengths and weaknesses Interaction between other related initiatives Extract Best practices
- 28. 28 Data inconsistency identified as a main weakness Cities with already a energy/climate plan normally need to make an extra effort in order to adapt to CoM e.g. Amsterdam has an ambitious climate plan but does not meet the CoM data reporting requirements Cities with tradition on climate/energy subjects are the only ones able to report 1990 as a reference year as proposed by the methodology (4 out of 25)
- 29. 29 Recurrent cases of non detailed data for all sectors and energy carriers Hard to evaluate the overall impact Mandatory and optional fields of data filling in the template downgrades the quality of data Use of national statistics prevents signatories to provide a complete and coherent BEI Only 7 cities of 25 cover all sectors Implementation and monitoring phases are not well documented
- 30. 30 Data reporting remains a major challenge for signatories and the level of details in the templates shows a certain country dependence EnMS can present as a valid tool for consistency of methodological approach and guarantee quality of data in municipalities Energy Audits in the EnMS can be of great help while planning and implementing Energy Efficiency measures Small municipalities can bypass the lack of resources in “Energy Staff” with the implementation of a EnMS 5. Some considerations
- 31. Thank you! Tiago Serrenho +39 0332 78 9628 Tiago.SERRENHO@ec.europa.eu Joint Research Centre (JRC) IET - Institute for Energy and Transport Petten - The Netherlands & Ispra - Italy http://iet.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ http://www.jrc.ec.europa.eu