SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Double Chooz
Matthew Worcester (University of Chicago)
for the Double Chooz Collaboration
Neutrinos and Dark Matter 2009
September 1, 2009
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 2
Neutrino Mixing
 best fits:
 what is e component of 3?
1 2
1 2 3
1 2 3
12 12 13 13
12 12 23 23
13
3
13 23
cos sin 0 cos 0 sin 1 0 0
sin cos 0 0 1 0 0 cos sin
0 0 1 sin 0 cos
?
0 sin co
CP
CP
ee e
i
i
U U Big Big
U U U U Big Big Big
U U U
U
Big Big Big
e
mall
e
S
  
  


   
   
  

   
   
    
   
   
  
  
     
        23s
 
 
 
 
 
SK+K2K+MINOS
Solar+KamLand
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 3
Motivation
 Value of 13 :
 Mass hierarchy and scale
 CP violation
 CHOOZ 1997 →
 Reactor experiment
provides clean
measurement of 13:
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 4
Reactor Neutrinos
 Nuclear reactors are intense
sources with a well–measured flux
and spectrum
 3 GW → 6×1020 /sec
700 events /year/ton at 1500 m
 visible spectrum peak at ~ 3.7 MeV
 oscillation max. for Dm2=2.510-3 eV2
at L ~1500 m
Arbitrary
Observable  Spectrum
From Bemporad, Gratta and Vogel
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50
E (MeV)
ObservedEvents
Dm
2
= 2.5 10
-3
eV
2
Full Mixing
No Osc.
1500 m
 Disappearance measurement:
 look for small deviation between near
(~200m) and far (~1500m) detectors:
 counting = number of events
 shape = energy spectra
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 5
Detection
 Inverse –decay:

 155Gd,157Gd capture:

  ~ 30 sec
(0.1% Gd concentration)
 Events selected by
coincidence
  energy spectrum given by
visible e+ energy:
 E = Evis + 1.8 MeV – 2me
6 meters
Shielding
n
e+
e
Liquid Scintillator
with Gadolinium
= Photomultiplier Tube
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 6
13 Limits
 5.55 m3 doped target in single
detector @ 1050m
 ~3 months data-taking
 2% systematic on reactor flux
2
atmmD 2
solarmD
CHOOZ:
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 7
Improve Limits
 Add identical near detector: need only relative acceptance
 remove systematics from reactor neutrino flux, energy
 New detector design
 low radioactivity PMTs protected by mineral oil
 addition of non-doped “gamma-catcher” defines target volume
 New Gd scintillator mixture: instability in CHOOZ scintillator attenuation
 Reduce cosmogenic backgrounds: add outer detectors
Chooz B nuclear power plant
on France/Belgium border
Meuse river
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 8
Double Chooz
Features of Double Chooz site:
• 24.27 GWthermal reactors – 8.54 GW maximum power
• Far site hall reusable from original CHOOZ with 300 mwe
mountain overburden at 1050 m baseline
• Near site: ~40 m rock (115 mwe) overburden at 410 m baseline
Far detector only
22,800 νe in 1.5 years
0.7% stat. uncertaintyNear + far detectors
45,600 νe (far detector) in 3 years
0.5% stat. uncertainty
Collaboration
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 9
Phase 1: Far detector only
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 10
Systematic % Error
Reactor Power 1.9
Energy per fission 0.6
νe/fission 0.2
ν cross section 0.1
Systematic % Error
Detector volume 0.2
Scintillator
density
0.01
H/C composition < 0.5
Gd concentration 0.3
Deadtime 0
e+ energy cut 0.1
n loss (spill in/out) < 1.0
n energy cut 0.1
Time cut 0.4
Reactor
 2.0% total systematic
 based on CHOOZ analysis
 dominates Phase 1 errors
Detector and data selection
• < 1.3% total systematic (CHOOZ analysis: 1.5% total)
Phase 2: Near + Far Detectors
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 11
Systematic errors on the relative normalization
 PMT radioactivity protected by oil buffer (CHOOZ: 60 Hz, DC: 1.5 Hz)
 cosmogenic neutron background reduced by improved vetos
 in situ calibrations improve energy scale for selection cuts
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 12
Backgrounds
 Accidental
 random coincidences between two different events (e.g. radioactive decay
plus cosmogenic neutron) together fake IBD signal
 Correlated
 fast neutron – from muon showers near detector. A single neutron can
elastically scatter in the target and subsequently capture on Gd
 muon capture – on nuclei in dead material along muon track can produce
several high-energy neutrons
 9Li – production by muon spallation inside target. Production mechanism
not well-understood. About 50% of β decays produce a neutron. 178 ms
half life causes prohibitive deadtime if vetoed by muon track in target.
Expected Sensitivity
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 13
sin22θ13 < 0.03 with
0.5% stat. uncertainty
requires systematic errors of:
 < 0.6% relative normalization
 < 1% total background
Far Site Hall
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 14
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 15
Inner Detectors
 Target
 10.3 m3 (8.8 tonnes) of 0.1%
Gd-doped LS
 Gamma-catcher
 ~50 cm (22.6 m3) of LS
 Buffer
 105 cm of nonscintillating
organic liquid (114.2 m3)
 390 10” Hamamatsu PMTs
 Inner Veto
 90 m3 LS with 78 8” PMTs
h = 2458mm
d = 2300mm
h = 3574mm
d = 3392mm
h = 5674mm
d = 5516mm
h = 6640mm
d = 6590mm
Detector Simulation
 Geant4-based Monte Carlo with ROOT output
 detailed detector geometry and pulse modeling
 νe events generated throughout central detectors
 two reconstructed events within 100 μsec window
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 16
_
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 17
Outer Veto
 two 7.0 x 7.2 meter panels ~1 m above the inner detectors
 overlapped vertically for continuous active coverage
 mounted to retractable steel shielding
 one 3.6 x 3.6 m upper panel above glove box
 protects neck and provides tracking
LAYOUT
Raw muon rates
Near 5.9 Hz/m2
Far 0.62 Hz/m2
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 18
Veto Effect
 rate of neutrons (from “near-miss” muons) entering
the central detector as a function of OV width
 muons which deposit energy in the central detectors are
removed
 FLUKA generated muon sample
Near site, 100% efficient detectors
Background candidate neutron study
Far Detector Construction
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 19
Original CHOOZ hall and pit refurbished and
new cleanliness standards achieved
Construction pictures
from CEA/CNRS/IRFU
Far Detector Progress
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 20
Far Detector Progress
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 21
Far Detector Progress
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 22
Far Detector Current Status
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 23
Now: acrylic vessels complete
and integration is ongoing.
Near Detector Status
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 24
Preliminary
Schedule
 Geological survey completed for near lab February 2009
 Far detector
 Now installing acrylic vessels
 Outer veto module construction on schedule →
 Inner detector closed at the end of 2009
 Liquid scintillator filling through April 2010
 Begin data-taking with inner far detector in April
 Outer veto installed after filling (not required for inner detector
data taking)
 Near hall construction begins end of 2010
 Near detector data taking in 2011
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 25
Conclusion
 Double Chooz will be the first new generation
detector reactor neutrino experiment to
measure θ13
 April 2010 begin far detector data taking
 achieve current limit of sin22θ13 < 0.15 at 90% CL
with approximately one month of data
 near detector data taking in 2011
 five years after start of data taking (3 yrs of
two detectors): sin22θ13 < 0.03 at 90% CL
September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 26

More Related Content

PDF
Experimental summary (neutrinos) - Rencontres du Vietnam - - 2017.07
PDF
cl21-UCNt-Slaughter
PDF
EXO_DBD07
PDF
N2O emissions from a recently afforested grassland in Dripsey
PDF
Nitrogen Chemistry in Disffuse Interstellar Medium
PPTX
NIAC Phase 2 Poster
PDF
KEK PH 2017
PDF
Applications of Quantum Cascade Lasers
Experimental summary (neutrinos) - Rencontres du Vietnam - - 2017.07
cl21-UCNt-Slaughter
EXO_DBD07
N2O emissions from a recently afforested grassland in Dripsey
Nitrogen Chemistry in Disffuse Interstellar Medium
NIAC Phase 2 Poster
KEK PH 2017
Applications of Quantum Cascade Lasers

What's hot (20)

PDF
Neutron log-abdulsalam
PPTX
PPT
Satellite Remote Sensing (Kasatochi eruption)
PDF
Detector Simulation for HEP
PDF
Molecular nitrogen in_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko_indicates_a_low_format...
PPTX
Numerical and analytical studies of single and multiphase starting jets and p...
PPTX
Acoustic and seismic effects of the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteorite as measured by...
PDF
3d modeling of_gj1214b_atmosphere_formation_of_inhomogeneous_high_cloouds_and...
PPTX
The Chelyabinsk meteor: joint interpretation of infrasound, acoustic, and sei...
PPS
A universal matter-wave interferometer with optical gratings in the time domain
PDF
UNF Undergrad Physics
PDF
Radon exhalation rate and Radionuclides in soil, phosphate, and building mate...
PDF
Zero-Point Energy Harvesters
PDF
D041012731
PDF
Prof Osamu Tajima
PDF
68th ICREA Colloquium "Results from the LHC Run II" by Mario Martínez
PPT
Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery
PDF
Combinatorial Experimentation and Machine Learning for Materials Discovery
PDF
Plasma propulsionm2p2
PDF
1071 bickford[1]
Neutron log-abdulsalam
Satellite Remote Sensing (Kasatochi eruption)
Detector Simulation for HEP
Molecular nitrogen in_comet_67_p_churyumov_gerasimenko_indicates_a_low_format...
Numerical and analytical studies of single and multiphase starting jets and p...
Acoustic and seismic effects of the 2013 Chelyabinsk meteorite as measured by...
3d modeling of_gj1214b_atmosphere_formation_of_inhomogeneous_high_cloouds_and...
The Chelyabinsk meteor: joint interpretation of infrasound, acoustic, and sei...
A universal matter-wave interferometer with optical gratings in the time domain
UNF Undergrad Physics
Radon exhalation rate and Radionuclides in soil, phosphate, and building mate...
Zero-Point Energy Harvesters
D041012731
Prof Osamu Tajima
68th ICREA Colloquium "Results from the LHC Run II" by Mario Martínez
Nanomaterials for Drug Delivery
Combinatorial Experimentation and Machine Learning for Materials Discovery
Plasma propulsionm2p2
1071 bickford[1]
Ad

Viewers also liked (14)

PPTX
La violencia, un producto de canasta básica
PDF
The hope amid the chaos
PDF
El amor luis andres
PPTX
Chapter 2 (1)
DOCX
SamCV-General-Australia
PPT
eFolder webinar — Killer App Cage Match: Three Partners Share Their File Sync...
PDF
Resume
DOCX
Makalah permasalan guru dan solusinya
PPTX
Eluard
PPTX
Simbolos de España
PPS
Países dos balcã
PPT
Socialdemocracia
PPS
Bandera de España
PDF
Protocolo...Porquê? (Isabel Ardions)
La violencia, un producto de canasta básica
The hope amid the chaos
El amor luis andres
Chapter 2 (1)
SamCV-General-Australia
eFolder webinar — Killer App Cage Match: Three Partners Share Their File Sync...
Resume
Makalah permasalan guru dan solusinya
Eluard
Simbolos de España
Países dos balcã
Socialdemocracia
Bandera de España
Protocolo...Porquê? (Isabel Ardions)
Ad

Similar to DC_NDM2009 (20)

PDF
First results from a prototype for the Fluorescence detector Array of Single-...
PDF
UHS Entrance Test MCAT Syllabus 2014
PPTX
Low-power Portable Laser Spectroscopic Sensor for Atmospheric CO2 Monitoring
PPT
Federico Capasso: Photonics as Design
PDF
ProceedingForBloisConf_StefanoPerasso
PPTX
Airborne and underground matter-wave interferometers: geodesy, navigation and...
PDF
FAST実験2:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の性能評価
PDF
FAST実験6:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡による観測報告とピエールオージェ観測所への設置計画
PPT
Search for Neutron Electric Dipole Moment
PPTX
0_PWSFAC1254172023105232.pptx
PDF
Unraveling interfacial processes by scanning (electrochemical) probe microscopy
PDF
Meph 569 final exam- 032
PPTX
High Precision, Not High Energy: Using Atomic Physics to Look Beyond the Stan...
PDF
Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography
PPTX
Compiled presentations MOS
PPTX
Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
PDF
publicatie C14_2014-2263-1-PB
PPTX
Water Impurity Measurement System using Microwaves
PPT
PARABLE POSTER
PPTX
High-accuracy laser spectrometers for wireless trace-gas sensor networks
First results from a prototype for the Fluorescence detector Array of Single-...
UHS Entrance Test MCAT Syllabus 2014
Low-power Portable Laser Spectroscopic Sensor for Atmospheric CO2 Monitoring
Federico Capasso: Photonics as Design
ProceedingForBloisConf_StefanoPerasso
Airborne and underground matter-wave interferometers: geodesy, navigation and...
FAST実験2:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡の性能評価
FAST実験6:新型大気蛍光望遠鏡による観測報告とピエールオージェ観測所への設置計画
Search for Neutron Electric Dipole Moment
0_PWSFAC1254172023105232.pptx
Unraveling interfacial processes by scanning (electrochemical) probe microscopy
Meph 569 final exam- 032
High Precision, Not High Energy: Using Atomic Physics to Look Beyond the Stan...
Electrical Capacitance Volume Tomography
Compiled presentations MOS
Instrumentation of Mass Spectrometry
publicatie C14_2014-2263-1-PB
Water Impurity Measurement System using Microwaves
PARABLE POSTER
High-accuracy laser spectrometers for wireless trace-gas sensor networks

DC_NDM2009

  • 1. Double Chooz Matthew Worcester (University of Chicago) for the Double Chooz Collaboration Neutrinos and Dark Matter 2009 September 1, 2009
  • 2. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 2 Neutrino Mixing  best fits:  what is e component of 3? 1 2 1 2 3 1 2 3 12 12 13 13 12 12 23 23 13 3 13 23 cos sin 0 cos 0 sin 1 0 0 sin cos 0 0 1 0 0 cos sin 0 0 1 sin 0 cos ? 0 sin co CP CP ee e i i U U Big Big U U U U Big Big Big U U U U Big Big Big e mall e S                                                              23s           SK+K2K+MINOS Solar+KamLand
  • 3. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 3 Motivation  Value of 13 :  Mass hierarchy and scale  CP violation  CHOOZ 1997 →  Reactor experiment provides clean measurement of 13:
  • 4. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 4 Reactor Neutrinos  Nuclear reactors are intense sources with a well–measured flux and spectrum  3 GW → 6×1020 /sec 700 events /year/ton at 1500 m  visible spectrum peak at ~ 3.7 MeV  oscillation max. for Dm2=2.510-3 eV2 at L ~1500 m Arbitrary Observable  Spectrum From Bemporad, Gratta and Vogel 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 1.50 2.50 3.50 4.50 5.50 6.50 7.50 8.50 E (MeV) ObservedEvents Dm 2 = 2.5 10 -3 eV 2 Full Mixing No Osc. 1500 m  Disappearance measurement:  look for small deviation between near (~200m) and far (~1500m) detectors:  counting = number of events  shape = energy spectra
  • 5. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 5 Detection  Inverse –decay:   155Gd,157Gd capture:    ~ 30 sec (0.1% Gd concentration)  Events selected by coincidence   energy spectrum given by visible e+ energy:  E = Evis + 1.8 MeV – 2me 6 meters Shielding n e+ e Liquid Scintillator with Gadolinium = Photomultiplier Tube
  • 6. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 6 13 Limits  5.55 m3 doped target in single detector @ 1050m  ~3 months data-taking  2% systematic on reactor flux 2 atmmD 2 solarmD CHOOZ:
  • 7. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 7 Improve Limits  Add identical near detector: need only relative acceptance  remove systematics from reactor neutrino flux, energy  New detector design  low radioactivity PMTs protected by mineral oil  addition of non-doped “gamma-catcher” defines target volume  New Gd scintillator mixture: instability in CHOOZ scintillator attenuation  Reduce cosmogenic backgrounds: add outer detectors Chooz B nuclear power plant on France/Belgium border Meuse river
  • 8. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 8 Double Chooz Features of Double Chooz site: • 24.27 GWthermal reactors – 8.54 GW maximum power • Far site hall reusable from original CHOOZ with 300 mwe mountain overburden at 1050 m baseline • Near site: ~40 m rock (115 mwe) overburden at 410 m baseline Far detector only 22,800 νe in 1.5 years 0.7% stat. uncertaintyNear + far detectors 45,600 νe (far detector) in 3 years 0.5% stat. uncertainty
  • 9. Collaboration September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 9
  • 10. Phase 1: Far detector only September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 10 Systematic % Error Reactor Power 1.9 Energy per fission 0.6 νe/fission 0.2 ν cross section 0.1 Systematic % Error Detector volume 0.2 Scintillator density 0.01 H/C composition < 0.5 Gd concentration 0.3 Deadtime 0 e+ energy cut 0.1 n loss (spill in/out) < 1.0 n energy cut 0.1 Time cut 0.4 Reactor  2.0% total systematic  based on CHOOZ analysis  dominates Phase 1 errors Detector and data selection • < 1.3% total systematic (CHOOZ analysis: 1.5% total)
  • 11. Phase 2: Near + Far Detectors September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 11 Systematic errors on the relative normalization  PMT radioactivity protected by oil buffer (CHOOZ: 60 Hz, DC: 1.5 Hz)  cosmogenic neutron background reduced by improved vetos  in situ calibrations improve energy scale for selection cuts
  • 12. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 12 Backgrounds  Accidental  random coincidences between two different events (e.g. radioactive decay plus cosmogenic neutron) together fake IBD signal  Correlated  fast neutron – from muon showers near detector. A single neutron can elastically scatter in the target and subsequently capture on Gd  muon capture – on nuclei in dead material along muon track can produce several high-energy neutrons  9Li – production by muon spallation inside target. Production mechanism not well-understood. About 50% of β decays produce a neutron. 178 ms half life causes prohibitive deadtime if vetoed by muon track in target.
  • 13. Expected Sensitivity September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 13 sin22θ13 < 0.03 with 0.5% stat. uncertainty requires systematic errors of:  < 0.6% relative normalization  < 1% total background
  • 14. Far Site Hall September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 14
  • 15. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 15 Inner Detectors  Target  10.3 m3 (8.8 tonnes) of 0.1% Gd-doped LS  Gamma-catcher  ~50 cm (22.6 m3) of LS  Buffer  105 cm of nonscintillating organic liquid (114.2 m3)  390 10” Hamamatsu PMTs  Inner Veto  90 m3 LS with 78 8” PMTs h = 2458mm d = 2300mm h = 3574mm d = 3392mm h = 5674mm d = 5516mm h = 6640mm d = 6590mm
  • 16. Detector Simulation  Geant4-based Monte Carlo with ROOT output  detailed detector geometry and pulse modeling  νe events generated throughout central detectors  two reconstructed events within 100 μsec window September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 16 _
  • 17. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 17 Outer Veto  two 7.0 x 7.2 meter panels ~1 m above the inner detectors  overlapped vertically for continuous active coverage  mounted to retractable steel shielding  one 3.6 x 3.6 m upper panel above glove box  protects neck and provides tracking LAYOUT Raw muon rates Near 5.9 Hz/m2 Far 0.62 Hz/m2
  • 18. September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 18 Veto Effect  rate of neutrons (from “near-miss” muons) entering the central detector as a function of OV width  muons which deposit energy in the central detectors are removed  FLUKA generated muon sample Near site, 100% efficient detectors Background candidate neutron study
  • 19. Far Detector Construction September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 19 Original CHOOZ hall and pit refurbished and new cleanliness standards achieved Construction pictures from CEA/CNRS/IRFU
  • 20. Far Detector Progress September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 20
  • 21. Far Detector Progress September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 21
  • 22. Far Detector Progress September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 22
  • 23. Far Detector Current Status September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 23 Now: acrylic vessels complete and integration is ongoing.
  • 24. Near Detector Status September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 24 Preliminary
  • 25. Schedule  Geological survey completed for near lab February 2009  Far detector  Now installing acrylic vessels  Outer veto module construction on schedule →  Inner detector closed at the end of 2009  Liquid scintillator filling through April 2010  Begin data-taking with inner far detector in April  Outer veto installed after filling (not required for inner detector data taking)  Near hall construction begins end of 2010  Near detector data taking in 2011 September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 25
  • 26. Conclusion  Double Chooz will be the first new generation detector reactor neutrino experiment to measure θ13  April 2010 begin far detector data taking  achieve current limit of sin22θ13 < 0.15 at 90% CL with approximately one month of data  near detector data taking in 2011  five years after start of data taking (3 yrs of two detectors): sin22θ13 < 0.03 at 90% CL September 1, 2009 Worcester (Chicago) Double Chooz 26