Dealing with resistances

Dealing
with Resistances
An Analysis of the First Steps of the
Development of a Brand New Gender
Equality Plan at the University of
Cagliari, Italy

The SUPERA PROJECT
Since June 2018, the University of Cagliari (UniCa) is one of the partners of an
international team involved in a four-year- project funded within the frame of
the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, under
grant agreement n°787829, called SUPERA (Supporting the Promotion of
Equality in Research and Academia).
8 Partners (6 RPO and 2 RFO)
11 members in UniCa Core Team (Coordinator: Luigi Raffo; Ester Cois, Clementina Casula, Cristina
Cabras, Silvia Balia, Barbara Barbieri, Paola Carboni, Paola Fadda, Francesco Mola, Simona Scalas,
Giovanni Sulis)

A NEW GEP for UniCa
This project is aimed at involving UniCa as a whole, just like the other
international partners, in the construction and implementation of its Gender
Equality Plan, as a completely new organizational tool.
Since the beginning of the process, during the very first phase of self-assessment
of the state of the art in our University regarding gender equality policies and
practices, the UniCa core team has been able to collect many forms of
resistances within the organization, expressed by all the types of stakeholders:
from the top positions of the administrative structure, up to the teaching and
research staff, technical staff, and the wide audience of students attending the
various faculties and degree courses.

Different Manifestations of Resistance

Forms of Resistance
It is necessary to distinguish between the institutional level and the individual and
occasional level:
while in the first case there have been no explicit or implicit obstacles to the efficient
development of the work conducted by the UniCa Core Team, revealing a good
organizational culture on this matter and the full endorsement and legitimation
expressed by the Rector, a wide set of resistances has been instead expressed at the
level of the single individuals involved in various forms in these early stages of the
project.

Channels of Resistance
a) A documentary analysis related to the current rules and policies on gender equality in the University of
Cagliari: the administrative and executive officers contacted to find this kind of materials did not express any
form of resistance, rather they've been fully collaborative and effective in transmitting the requested
documents.
b) The collection of quali-quantitative administrative data related to the four thematic key-areas of the UniCa-
SUPERA Report: also in this case, the staff of the various Departments that we have contacted (with
particular reference to the IT and the Human Resources Departments) didn't expressed any kind of
resistance, neither explicit nor implicit, showing an excellent collaboration and an enthusiastic attitude to
make themselves useful for the completion of the required task regarding the functioning, at present, of
UniCa, with respect to the gender dynamics (for example with respect to the data necessary to complete the
analysis on the horizontal and vertical segregation mechanisms within the teaching and research staff, the
administrative staff and the student body).
c) The completion of an (on line) qualitative questionnaire on gender equality (values, attitudes & experiences)
by the teaching and administrative-technical staff and by the student body. This was the only event in which
several types of resistances emerged, on an individual level (Response Rate: 29% of the teaching and
administrative staff and 13% of the students).

A Taxonomy of Resistances
A) Ex-Ante/In Itinere: resistances expressed both BEFORE and DURING the
completion of the questionnaire
- Choice of this tool to detect gender equality issues (use of concepts and definitions)
- Suitability of this instrument to deal with specific sensitive matters
B) In Itinere/Ex-Post: resistances expressed DURING and AFTER the completion of the
questionnaire
- Focused in general on gender equality as a theme and on its specific key-contents:
 Gender biases in recruitment, retention, career progression;
 Leadership and decision making, accountability, transparency, inclusiveness;
 Gender dimension in research and knowledge transfer, in content and curricula;
 Gender biases and stereotypes, sexism and sexual harassment

A) Ex-Ante/In Itinere
A1) Resistances related to the survey as a methodological tool
- Choice of Concepts and Definitions (language, methodology, ethical issues,
compulsory questions):
It is not clear what you intend to detect through this questionnaire, given that there is a clear confusion
and indeterminacy in the use of the terms: at the beginning the concept of "gender equality" is used, then
you move on to “discrimination”, then to a condition not better defined as a "disadvantage", then to
“differences”. About all these concepts, very different from each other, there is no explanation of contents
and meanings, among which the respondents can orient themselves and choose those to which their
answers will refer (TRS, F).
- Need of more detailed information on the meaning of some questions
In the section of the questionnaire on undesired behaviors and sexual harassment, I have marked things
that still do not bother me, because I did not understand what was meant (ST, F).

A) Ex-Ante/In Itinere
A2) Lack of Inclusivity of a binary and heteronormed perspective (male/female)
I believe it is necessary to include in the questionnaire the neutral or non-binary gender. Not everyone
recognizes themselves in the masculine and feminine gender and the mandatory form of this choice does not
contribute to the inclusiveness of those who do not belong in one of the two genders. Even recognizing this
reality means approaching gender equality (ST, F).
- Intersectionality?
I believe that this questionnaire should not be based only on a gender difference, but on a wider spectrum:
sexual orientation, sexual identity, religion, ethnicity. In my opinion, the problem is linked to the prejudice and
the fear of the different people, dictated by ignorance (in the literal sense of the term) that at the University, in
different sectors, reigns undisputed. Obviously I appreciate the efforts of UniCA aimed at improving freedom of
expression in the academic context, perhaps starting from gender equality will make it possible to gain a better
equality for any individual regardless of their differences (ST, M).

B) In Itinere/Ex-Post
Resistances related to the gender equality as a theme and its specific key-contents
B1) Ignorance about Facts: Cognitive resistances, that largely refer to the dilemma
"What I Know / What I Don't Know / What I Think I Know" around this topic,
evoking behaviours like
 Neglecting that gender-based discrimination (still) exists;
 Claiming it’s historical or only present in certain institutions but not in the
University of Cagliari;
 Minimising the facts;
 Victim-blaming or Fear of Victim-Blaming;
 Joking about the topic through sexist remarks.

B1) Ignorance about Facts
The risk that an excessive attention to gender equality does not give due
consideration to the most correct parameter of merit, regardless of gender, which in
itself would therefore be a false problem, as there would be no real discrimination at
UniCa from this point of view.
I personally believe this project and this questionnaire are not very useful and very ideological. In any case, in my
humble opinion, in a society leaning towards progress, the greatest importance should be given to merit and
competence without the ideological obsession of the politically correct and without protection ex iure for one sex or
the other. That is, if the University announced a competition to recruit a hundred people, I do not believe that there
should be 50 men and 50 women to be hired, but the most competent and well-trained among them, which could
mean 95 women and 5 men, but also the opposite (ST, M).
Gender equality is to be assessed on the basis of what is your value as a person not based on your gender (ST, M).
On the one hand, I believe it is right to protect any person, to guarantee his/her safety and a path that allows
him/her to obtain justice if something unpleasant happens; on the other hand, I believe that the more we
emphasize the difference between men and women, the more this difference is accentuated, with an effect
completely opposite to what one would like. It is necessary to guarantee the safety of the persons, because persons,
not because men or women! Just as in any sector we need to look at merit, and not persist increating these sort of
absurd men-women battles! (ST, M).

The risk that an excessive attention on gender equality, and in particular on the
rebalancing of women's opportunities with respect to men through positive actions,
creates ghettos, and if anything exalt the vulnerability of women as a weaker sex in
need of additional help.
Women must be allowed to emerge without any advantage. Otherwise they are considered in the same way as
disabled people (I do not intend to offend them) (ST, M).
I am a woman and I believe that any woman can and must show that she can do the same job as a man, for
example. But you have to demonstrate it, not claim to be able to do it just with words (ST, F).
I never felt discriminated, nor I want to be considered a victim to be protected andfavoured just because I’m a
woman. We are all equal and must have the same possibilities: we are not weak beings to be protected like a
‘protected category’. At the University of Cagliari (and even in the Italian society) gender equality is already a
reality.(F, TRS)

The issue of gender inequality would be obsolete and no longer occur, especially at
UniCa.
In short, the real gender struggles are those of several decades ago. Today we should struggle for other issues, like
the right to an epidural or to treatments for certain diseases that affect women or men. Emphasize the difference
between men and women even where it does not exist generates hate, atomism, inability to make a common front
for far more serious problems in our society. Gender violence exists, unfortunately, of course and it should not be
neglected, but I think that now that battle is being done in the worst way (ST, F).
Gender equality has already been largely achieved by giving women the possibility of living independently
(something almost impossible in the past). All the rest are customs and traditions that change from country to
country and characterize the cultural variety of a population (ST, M).

The sexism that is talked about so much would be a false problem, used
instrumentally by women to take advantage of it, if anything.
I must confess that what worries me (perhaps because I am doing a thesis on gender issues) is also that our
reaction as women to gender impartiality is, sometimes, an expression of male chauvinism or anyway a
strengthening of male chauvinism. I want to quote an episode related to a day in which there was an exam: "L. you
are fine with your skirt" "hehe, I know, it's short! Guess why I put it". L. was referring to the fact that with that skirt
she would have given the exam more easily because her professor, as a man, would have liked her more and would
certainly have appreciated a short skirt, a red lipstick, a sweet look. For me the problem of gender equality lies in
those who exercise it repressively over others, and in those who bend it to their advantage (ST, F).
I think it is essential to avoid any form of gender victimization aimed at achieving an agenda, whether it is
performed by a female or by a male (ST, F).
I would like to point out that in my university experience, as a woman, I believe I have suffered more discrimination
from women than from men. I believe that any awareness- raising actions should also be focused on this aspect,
namely that if there is no complicity, collaboration and solidarity between women, we are starting from the wrong
premises. I believe that the competition that exists between female colleagues and female professors is one of the
problems that makes the climate within the University less friendly (ST, F).

In the worst case scenario, this kind of inequalities would occur elsewhere, not at
UniCa.
Unfortunately there are still places on the planet where the rights of so many people are trampled on for gender
reasons. Fortunately this does not happen or in any case rarely happens where I live. A man and a woman in the
western world can do what they want of their lives, but this topic often is over-exposed in the media although I
believe that there is no emergency in this regard, indeed having made great strides especially in the last 50 years.
There are other topics to be considered as priorities with respect to this one, both at national and university level. I
also believe that this excessive attention to the gender subject has in the long run as a result the opposite effect
than the prefixed one. It is time that everyone takes their responsibilities, without useless assistance, both men and
women, and this is my idea of equality of gender (ST, M).
I consider this a delicate matter. Sometimes we come across a forced gender differentiation that risks further
accentuating the differences. The argument I believe should not be presented as a social overthrow of imaginary
barriers, but as a cultural overcoming of individuals and social contexts in which we want to operate. Precisely, I
believe that doing seminars on gender differences in a place like the university, where a collective conscience
towards the problem already exists, is substantially useless, also because the staff is 80% female. The question is
found above all in work environments, where there is no careful management of people by qualified personnel. The
commitment must be at 360 ° (ST, F).

The problem is minimized or reduced to a joke with vulgar or sexist comments
tending to victim-blaming.
Wow, what a waste of time! I thought to find some questions on the difference in pay or mortality rates and instead
always the usual stereotypical questions "Have they ever harassed you ????" "Did you receive different treatments
just because you have tits???". You are pathetic, give yourself a wake up call, you are pissing me off (ST, F).
Only women complain about discrimination (only a few, stupid women, not as women, but as ignorant people). I, a
man, personally have never seen partisan attitudes against women at the university, but I have heard female
colleagues complaining male chauvinism just because they failed in exams on which they were not prepared, and I
witnessed that! And the same women claimed to go half-naked to an exam because the teacher was a maniac, so
they passed it! So the sex equality is right, but it is getting out of control because it is used as a tool to extort more
and more, and not to be equal. Since we are already equal (ST, M).
The only forms of gender inequality that I have suffered have been performed by filthy professors who, when they
see a beautiful girl, ask easier questions during an oral exam and therefore give a higher grade than a male with
the same preparation. But it is normal: the world is controlled by the pussy and we have to accept it! (ST, M).

B2) Denial of the Problem
These are axiological and emotional resistances, that concern the attribution of value
to the issue of gender equality, based on the assumption "It is not important/I do not
care", with answers like:
 Claiming the outcome of gender-based discrimination is the result of a biological
predisposition and thereby refuting that these individuals’ behaviour is driven by
societal expectations about their gender roles;
 Blindness to harm caused by gender stereotypes;
 Blindness to psychological cost of gender-based discrimination;
 General minimisation of the effects and putting them low on any priority list,
saying there are more urgent matters to tackle.

The Problem Does Not Exist.
a) An explicit rejection of feminism, considered as a sterile and obsolete ideology without any value; also a refusal of any
definition of gender, considered a form of ideological categorization completely useless.
I believe that the concept of gender equality should be universally recognized, in my opinion there is no position, faculty, etc.
that it is more suitable for one sex than the other. I believe that everything must be focused on the merit and skill of the
individuals. The imposition of the pink quotas or other positive actions only for women, like the double male/female
preference in the elections or in the representative institutions, from the simplest to the most complicated ones, are just a
way to force the system that does not reward the merit but the sex. It is no longer an incentive for gender equality based on
meritocracy but rather becomes an untitled abuse and a damage for the male sex and for all women and all men who have
the right to hold a position or whatever. In essence, I am overly opposed to feminism, I am absolutely in favor of overcoming
the concept of male chauvinism and feminism and therefore favorable to this sort of gender equality, that is the one that
rewards those who deserve, without looking at whether you are a man, a woman, a gay, a trans, bi-sexual etc. (ST, M).
I believe that gender equality in this sad society is a must. But more generally I think it is completely useless, or better: the
concept of gender is so weak that it is useless for it to exist. No men and no women. Only people or individuals. In this sense
gender equality is useless, because gender should not literally and grammatically exist (ST, M).
Gender equality (or equal opportunities) already exists in Italy. It is not up to the university to teach these concepts but to
families. It is not wrong to say that this test was inspired by the distorted view of what feminism is in other states (especially
USA). Gender equality has already been achieved here and there is no need to continue this charade (ST, M).

b) Other ways of expressing disinterest or an explicit refusal to assume this is a real problem, rather than
the astute coverage of differences in achievements that have nothing to do with gender, so women
should stop once and for all to complain about it.
Gender equality does not mean equality. Addressing people of mixed gender with plural masculine words is a
grammatical convention. In my faculty (Engineering N.dR.) I never witnessed any kind of gender disparity, but a few
people would be able to complain anyway (ST, M).
Gender equality is a poor and superficial matter, totally in opposition to the meaning that my morality attributes to
the concept of equity and equality among individuals. Gender equality diminishes the individuality of human beings
and is a concept on which weak and non-critical people take refuge (ST, M).

c) If gender asymmetry exists, it is a natural consequence of biological differences, because males and
females are in themselves complementary and what happens would therefore be a fact that is uselessly
challenged just to create problems, that don't exist indeed.
I believe that gender equality in rights and obligations is one of the founding pillars of a civil society. I also believe, however, that
extreme "protectionism" in favour of a gender considered to be falsely weak opens the door to false equality. To emphasize, to
oblige, to categorize a certain thing on the basis of gender, even if with the most noble aims, is still a deepening of this disparity.
This excessive behavior (to speak all the time of femicide, to bend the Italian language to the issue of gender equality) is however
the result of a paternalistic mentality that still sees in the "weak" sex something to protect, which is not an achievement at all for
women! The differences between genders exist and it is stupid to argue the opposite, from a scientific, psychological, cultural, etc.
point of view... Differences should not be resolved, they must be known so that they do not become sources of disparity. The
differences make you grow (ST, M).
I think gender equality is not writing "Capa" (NdR. “Female Leader” in italian). In fact it is just a form of violence perpetrated against
our language). Gender equality is having the opportunity to do the same things but also understanding that men and women are
different, because we are all different, with different qualities, with different dreams etc. Gender equality is giving the same
opportunities, but not for this reason we must consider ourselves interchangeable. Diversity is our strength (ST, F).
I was quite thrilled with the importance being given to "gender equality".Exaggerated for several reasons. The social behaviors are
now increasingly diverse and libertine, we find women who have male behaviors and men with female behaviors. I also think it is
stupid to ask a male how he would behave in situations of harassment. The male is biologically a sexually active animal more than a
woman, this is irrefutable. The male has always been in nature with a high testosterone, especially at certain times of the year.
Asking a male to remain calm or to avoid having sexual urges is like asking an animal not to be aggressive. Chemically and
biologically speaking it is impossible due to internal hormone levels. Asking therefore to have an absolute sex equality is an absurd
request and out of any natural logic (ST, M).

d) Theissueof gender inequality would be totally useless, and therefore cannot be a real problem.
Gender equality can be a good thing in some ways (it is right that for the same performance, a woman
should be paid as much as a man), but quite useless for others (I consider more serious the physical
violence of a man on a woman compared to the other alternatives, although the violence is always
unjustified and always to be avoided, except in exceptional cases (ST, M).
We study computers, those problem does not arise much in reality, but nice try (NdR. Sciences) (SR, F).
I found this survey and projest extremely useless, and breaking the gender language is a useless battle
(ST, M).

There is a Problem, but the Survey formulates it in a wrong way and starts from
inverse biases with respect to gender.
a) The Survey would assume default that the household chores are necessarily asymmetrical to the
detriment of the female partner, and never the opposite and this is a wrong and counterproductive way
to deal with this issue, because it blames one sex against another, instead of reasoning in an inclusive
and non-dichotomous way.
The continuous use of political correctness by UniCa is counterproductive, and, in my opinion, get the opposite
result, because in fact it only accentuates gender inequality, given that many times women-friendly events and the
distortion of language for “gender equality'' sake can easily be transformed into ''giving more weight to the female
gender” (ST, M).

There is a Problem, but the Survey formulates it in a wrong way and starts from
inverse biases with respect to gender.
b) Not everything that is presented as a symptom of sexism really is, and even to pay attention to these
issues would only amplify hysteria and hypocrisy, ending up missing the point or concealing the cases of
sexism in the opposite direction.
I believe there is a limit within which these issues are significant. Let me explain better: it is true, we could carry with
us cultural aftermath of a past without gender equality; probably in the workplace wage differences or unequal
treatment still persist; this must be fought. But we must know how to separate things!!! Certain other arguments,
such as the language, or the criminalization of sexist jokes are sometimes ridiculous. I believe that while some are
serious acts of inequality, others are shown as such but do not constitute them at all. On the contrary, the mere fact
of identifying them as chauvinism creates gender inequality. All this is equally serious: the taboos that our society
has built over time must be torn down (ST, M).

There is a Problem, but there are far more serious problems to be tackled as a
priority.
a) There is a shift of the focus on other issues, other structural problems in the University or in society
that would be much more urgent to address than the issue of gender equality.
Gender Equality is an utopia. I find this subject stupid, and I think we shouldn't waste time on these
things. The university must improve many things about its whole organization, nor this one! (ST, F).

There is a Problem, but there are far more serious problems to be tackled as a
priority.
b) From a subjective experiential point of view it may be that the respondents to the survey have
become aware of discrimination dynamics, but also at the individual level the relevant issues are
other, and on those we would require greater attention.
This is a cute initiative, but now you must concretely worry about problems like the cleaning of the bathrooms, the
absence of toilet paper, the cleanliness and decorum of the classrooms, the conditions of abandonment of the
parking lots, the quality of food in the cafeteria, the architectural barriers and the lack of means of transport that
weigh on students and staff regardless of their sexual orientation (ST, M).

B3) Denial of Changeability
These are resistances connected not so much to the recognition of the problem or
its importance as to the solutions to counteract it, which are assumed to be
inaccessible and in any case not very useful, because these dynamics are too deep-
rooted and structural for us to think of having an institutional impact. We can
distinguish among:
 The perception of “that’s how things are”, while under-estimating the institution’s
own responsibility;
 Feelings of despair and passivity;
 Fear of reverse discrimination.

Expression of a widespread and general lack of confidence in this type of initiatives,
both informative and educational, because in any case "things go like this", and
discussing the issue of gender equality would be just an empty exercise or a useless
loss of time. The proposed solutions are only cosmetic and substantially completely
irrelevant (with particular reference to the adoption of a gender-sensitive language).
In my opinion it is more appropriate to promote meritocracy and gender equality by focusing more on facts than on
language. It is useless to promote a "politically correct" language if reality does not reflect the values that this
language takes into account (ST, F).
I disagree with the destruction of the Italian language in the useless effort to adapt words from the masculine to the
feminine, or in the optional insertion in each word of different endings separated by a bar. It is not with the distortion
of the beauty and fluidity of the Italian language that the problems linked to gender inequality are solved (ST, F).

Fear of discrimination on the opposite direction due to undue privileges for women,
following a perverse effect of positive actions or benevolent attitudes towards them
to the detriment of men.
In the scientific field, the obsession with gender equality is reaching paroxysmal levels. Outreach programs, study and
research funds reserved for women lead to favoring the career of the few female students compared to the most
numerous male colleagues. The result is that the competition in the male field remains real and meritocratic while in
the feminine field there is a tendency to favor everyone only for being a woman, regardless of scientific merit. If there
is a cultural problem, one cannot think of fighting a disparity with the opposite disparity. This relatively to the
"quantitative" gender equality. On violence and discrimination, of course, all my support. (ST, F).
Gender equality (as always) is a subject that is treated only from the point of view of the “poor and unfortunate
women” in a male-dominated society (nonsense!). The rights of men are always in the background (ST, M).

Perceived tension between equality of opportunity based on merit and gender
equality policies differentiating between men and women (such as affirmative action
or gender sensitive language application).
 In the case of men, the main fear is represented by reversed discrimination, given by the favouring
of female colleagues having lower competence on the exclusive basis of their gender, following a
sort of revanchist logic asking men to experience what women have suffered in the past
 Several women fear the perspective of being judged and making a career on the basis of their
gender, rather than on their merit and competences, which they wish to defend within an equal
treatment framework and a “may the best win” logic.

B4) Underestimation of own capacity
These are resistances expressed in an extremely personal form, bringing back the
sense of powerlessness with respect to this problem from a subjective point of view,
as if any possible effect of one's own contribution in this regard was denied.
Behaviors such the following ones fall into this type of resistance:
 Lack of interest and/or power in the group
 Passive aggressive behaviour (not doing anything)

a) Perception of institutional invasiveness in dealing with a such sensitive issue as discrimination, which
is substantially private, and therefore resistance to explain one's own affairs, especially the most delicate
ones, and in general to expose oneself with too clear opinions on this matter (choosing neutral, random
and irrelevant answers to the survey toprotect themselves and their privacy).
In the section of the questionnaire concerning attitudes I was not able to give truthful answers, because I think that
this is a private matter (ST, F).

b) Perception of the uselessness of personal opinions on these issues, as a symptom of passivity,
discouragement and resignation (“I do not say and I do nothing with respect to something that I cannot
change in any case, I limit myself to detecting it and acknowledging it, and I'll try to do my best in order
to not find myself in this type of situations).
I must admit that I have already heard of your questionnaire from some of my male colleagues, who are more
refractory to any issue concerning gender equality. In general, although I consider the awareness-raising initiatives
rather laudable, I fear that ultimately they are not useful in reaching that part of the public that hinders them the
most ...(ST, F).

c) Perception of disorientation with respect to these issues, related to the lack of information on what
can be done on an individual level (eg by declaring that they don't know which channels are available at
UniCa to report cases of harassments acted by teachers, although there is already the possibility of
doing so through a specific evaluation form, or by declaring that they don't have any knowledge about
the University regulations on the gender equality issues, in case of need to make use of them). The
result is a sense of detachment with respect to the institution, which translates into generalized distrust
and inaction.
I admire what you are trying to do but I also think that at the university you should arrive having already in mind the
rules of civil life. I think that first of all education should start within the family or otherwise outside the school.
Because you are born and you begin to learn a long time before, as you will know. I also think that a person who has
arrived at the university should already be able to understand whether what he/she does is right or wrong. What I am
trying to say is that as you know (again) it is more difficult to change a wrong thought or behavior if it has long been
rooted. Surely also the way in which someone else's action / attitude / comment is interpreted is relative and also in
this case it must start from an out-of-school education. It is commendable for the university to hire available
consultors and psychologists ready to listen and to help. The problem is that any inappropriate behavior should be
"eliminated" before arriving at the university (ST, M).

Some Concluding Remarks
How to deal with resistances?
Detecting the resistances encountered so far has been a useful starting point to understand where and how to focus
the actions and strategies necessary to develop an approach as participatory as possible in the imminent co-creation
of the GEP, on different levels:
a) Starting with the involvement of the Hub of “allies” as a support, advice and expertise channel within the various
areas of UniCa as an institution;
b) Collecting “best practices” from other national and international universities in order to have valuable benchmarks
and to create effective indicators for measuring the progress in gender equality development within UniCa.
c) Organizing Fab-Lab and Training Courses mainly targeted to the teaching and administrative staff and to the
student body in order to focus on specific issues related to gender equality within the University, as a workplace and
as a high educational and research context, and to reach a set of sustainable action proposals together (co-creation
approach).
N.B. Failing in recognizing in time these critical nodes could block the subsequent implementation of the GEP
throughout UniCa as an organization, jeopardizing the whole process.

www.superaproject.eu
info@superaproject.eu
@superaproject
#SuperaH2020
This project has received funding from the
European Union's Horizon 2020 research and
innovation programme under grant agreement
No. 787829.

Dealing with resistances

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Dealing with resistances (20)

More from SUPERA project (14)

Recently uploaded (20)

Dealing with resistances