Decompose that WAR? A pattern language for microservices (@QCON @QCONSP)
43 likes10,830 views
The document presents a pattern language for microservices, outlining the need for reusable solutions to common problems in microservice architecture. It discusses various deployment and communication patterns, highlighting the benefits and drawbacks of different approaches, such as monolithic versus microservice architectures. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding trade-offs and making informed decisions in software development through pattern languages.
Decompose that WAR? A pattern language for microservices (@QCON @QCONSP)
- 1. @crichardson Decompose that WAR! A pattern language for microservices Chris Richardson Author of POJOs in Action Founder of the original CloudFoundry.com @crichardson chris@chrisrichardson.net http://plainoldobjects.com http://microservices.io
- 2. @crichardson Presentation goal Why patterns and pattern languages? A pattern language for microservices
- 4. @crichardson About Chris Founder of a startup thatâs creating a platform for developing event-driven microservices
- 6. @crichardson Agenda Why a pattern language for microservices? Core patterns Deployment patterns Communication patterns
- 8. @crichardson Yet almost 30 years later developers are still passionately arguing over âsilver bulletsâ
- 9. @crichardson Suck/Rock Dichotomy Spring vs. Java EE JavaScript vs. Java Functional programming vs. Object-oriented http://nealford.com/memeagora/2009/08/05/suck-rock-dichotomy.html Containers vs. Virtual Machines
- 10. @crichardson Gartner Hype Cycle http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/bf/Hype-Cycle-General.png Itâs awesome Itâs not awesome Trade-offs understood
- 11. @crichardson How we make decisions Decide using emotions Rationalize with our intellect http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahout
- 12. @crichardson We need a better way to discuss and think about technology
- 13. @crichardson Whatâs a pattern? Reusable solution to a problem occurring in a particular context
- 14. @crichardson The structure of a pattern = Great framework for discussing and thinking about technology
- 15. @crichardson The structure of a pattern Resulting context aka the situation Name Context Problem Related patterns (conïŹicting) issues etc to address Forces Solution
- 17. @crichardson Related patterns Alternative solutions Solutions to problems introduced by this pattern
- 18. Pattern language A collection of related patterns that solve problems in a particular domain Relationships Pattern A results in a context that has a problem solved by Pattern B Patterns A and B solve the same problem Pattern A is a specialization of pattern B http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Pattern_Language Access to Water Promenade Local townhall Intimacy gradient Light on two sides
- 19. @crichardson Meta-pattern Problem: How to talk/reason about technology? Solution: Use the pattern format BeneïŹt: More objective Drawback: Less exciting Context: Emotional software development culture Related patterns: Itâs awesome!
- 20. @crichardson Monolithic architecture Microservice architecture API gateway Client-side discovery Server-side discovery Service registry Self registration 3rd party registration Multiple Services per host Single Service per Host Service-per- Container Deployment Discovery Core Communication Service-per-VM Partitioning Messaging Remote Procedure Invocation Style Motivating Pattern Solution Pattern Solution A Solution B General SpeciïŹc Work in progress
- 21. @crichardson Agenda Why a pattern language for microservices? Core patterns Deployment patterns Communication patterns
- 22. @crichardson
- 23. @crichardson Letâs imagine you are building an online store Browser/ Client SQL Database Review Service Product Info Service Recommendation Service StoreFrontUI Order Service HTML REST/JSON
- 24. @crichardson Problem: whatâs the deployment architecture?
- 25. @crichardson Forces There is a team of developers that must be productive The application must be easy to understand and modify Do continuous deployment Run multiple instances for scalability and availability Use emerging technologies (frameworks, programming languages, etc)
- 26. @crichardson Tomcat Pattern: Monolithic architecture Browser/ Client WAR/EAR MySQL Database Review Service Product Info Service Recommendation Service StoreFrontUI Order Service HTML REST/JSON develop test deploy Simple to scale
- 28. @crichardson But when the application is large âŠ
- 30. @crichardson Obstacle to frequent deployments Need to redeploy everything to change one component Interrupts long running background (e.g. Quartz) jobs Increases risk of failure Fear of change Updates will happen less often - really long QA cycles e.g. Makes A/B testing UI really difïŹcult Eggs in one basket
- 31. @crichardson Overloads your IDE and container Slows down development
- 32. @crichardson Lots of coordination and communication required Obstacle to scaling development I want to update the UI But the backend is not working yet!
- 33. @crichardson Requires long-term commitment to a technology stack
- 35. @crichardson Apply functional decomposition X axis - horizontal duplication Z axis -data partitioning Y axis - functional decomposition Scale by splitting sim ilar things Scale by splitting different things
- 36. @crichardson Product Info Microservice architecture Product Info Service Recommendation Service Review Service Order Service Browse Products UI Checkout UI Order management UI Account management UI Apply X-axis and Z-axis scaling to each service independently
- 38. @crichardson BeneïŹts Smaller, simpler apps Easier to understand and develop Less jar/classpath hell - who needs OSGI? Faster to build and deploy Scales development: develop, deploy and scale each service independently Improves fault isolation Eliminates long-term commitment to a single technology stack System level architecture vs. service level architecture Easily and safely experiment with new technologies
- 39. @crichardson Drawbacks Complexity of developing a distributed system Implementing inter-process communication Handling partial failures Implementing business transactions that span multiple databases (without 2PC) Complexity of testing a distributed system Complexity of deploying and operating a distributed system Managing the development and deployment of features that span multiple services Fortunately solutions exists
- 40. @crichardson The beneïŹts typically outweigh the drawbacks for large, complex applications
- 41. @crichardson Issues to address How to deploy the services? How do the services communicate? How do clients of the application communicate with the services? How to partition the system into services? âŠ.
- 42. @crichardson Agenda Why a pattern language for microservices? Core patterns Deployment patterns Communication patterns
- 43. @crichardson We have applied the microservices pattern: How to deploy the services?
- 44. @crichardson Forces Services are written using a variety of languages, frameworks, and framework versions Each service consists of multiple service instances for throughput and availability Building and deploying a service must be fast Service must be deployed and scaled independently Service instances need to be isolated Resources consumed by a service must be constrained Deployment must be cost-effective
- 45. @crichardson
- 46. @crichardson Pattern: Multiple service instances per host Host (Physical or VM) Service-A Instance-1 Service-B Instance-2 Service-C Instance-2 Process WAR OSGI bundle
- 47. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts EfïŹcient resource utilization Fast deployment Drawbacks Poor/Terrible isolation Poor visibility (with WAR/OSGI deployment) DifïŹcult to limit resource utilization Risk of dependency version conïŹicts Poor encapsulation of implementation technology
- 48. @crichardson Pattern: Service instance per host
- 49. @crichardson Pattern: Service per VM host Service VM image VM Service VM Service VM Service packaged as deployed as
- 50. @crichardson Example http://techblog.netïŹix.com/ ~600 services packer.io is a great tool
- 51. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Great isolation Great manageability VM encapsulates implementation technology Leverage AWS infrastructure for Autoscaling/Load balancingâ© Drawbacks Less efïŹcient resource utilization Slow deployment
- 52. @crichardson VM VM Pattern: Service per Container host Service Container image Container Service Container Service Container Service packaged as deployed as
- 54. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Great isolation Great manageability Container encapsulates implementation technology EfïŹcient resource utilization Fast deployment Drawbacks Immature infrastructure for deploying containers
- 55. @crichardson Agenda Why a pattern language for microservices? Core patterns Deployment patterns Communication patterns
- 56. @crichardson Communication issues System Client Service A Service B Service C The System How do clients of the system interact with the services? How do services within the system interact?
- 57. @crichardson
- 58. @crichardson How do clients of the system interact with the services?
- 59. @crichardson Forces Mismatch between the ïŹne-grained microservices and needs of the clients Different clients need different data LAN vs. WAN vs. Mobile network performance The number of service instances and their locations (host +port) is changes dynamically Partitioning into services can change over time and should be hidden from clients
- 60. @crichardson Directly connecting the front-end to the backend Model View Controller Product Info service Recommendation Service Review service REST REST Thrift Model View Controller Browser/Native App Traditional server-side web application Chatty API Web unfriendly protocols Whatâs the host/port??
- 61. @crichardson Pattern: API gateway Model View Controller Product Info service Recommendation Service Review service REST REST Thrift API Gateway Model View Controller Browser/Native App Single entry point Client speciïŹc APIs Protocol translation Traditional server-side web application
- 62. @crichardson Example: NetïŹix API http://techblog.netïŹix.com/2013/01/optimizing-netïŹix-api.html Device speciïŹc end points
- 63. @crichardson BeneïŹts of the API gateway Insulates the clients from the partitioning Insulates the clients from the problem of discovery Provides the optimal API for each client Reduces the number of requests/roundtrips SimpliïŹes the client by moving logic for calling multiple services from the client to API gateway Gateway translates between web-unfriendly protocols and HTTP/WebSockets
- 64. @crichardson Drawbacks of the API gateway Increased complexity - the API gateway is yet another highly available component that must be developed, deployed and managed Increased response time due to the additional network hop through the API gateway
- 65. @crichardson
- 66. BeneïŹts and drawbacks of messaging BeneïŹts Decouples client from services Message broker buffers messages Supports a variety of communication patternsâ© Drawbacks Additional complexity of message broker Request/reply-style communication is more complex Client needs to discover location of message broker
- 67. BeneïŹts and drawbacks of RPC BeneïŹts Simple and familiar Request/reply is easy No intermediate broker Drawbacks Only supports request/ reply Service must be available Client needs to discover locations of service instances
- 68. @crichardson
- 69. @crichardson The problem of discovery Service Client Service Instance A Service Instance B Service Instance C ? 10.4.3.1:8756 10.4.3.99:4545 10.4.3.20:333 Client or API gateway Dynamically changing Service Instance A Service Instance B Service Instance C 10.4.3.1:8756 10.4.3.99:4545 10.4.3.20:333 How to load balance? Dynamically assigned
- 70. @crichardson Pattern: Client-side discovery Service Client Registry- aware HTTP Client Service Registry Service Instance A Service Instance B Service Instance C 10.4.3.1:8756 10.4.3.99:4545 10.4.3.20:333 register query request load balance
- 71. @crichardson Example: NetïŹix Eureka and Ribbon https://github.com/NetïŹix/eureka/wiki/Eureka-at-a-glance https://github.com/NetïŹix/ribbon
- 72. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Flexible, application-speciïŹc load balancing Fewer network hops and moving parts compared to Server-side discoveryâ© Drawbacks Couples the client to the Service Registry Need implement client-side discovery and load balancing logic in multiple languages/ frameworks Service Registry is yet another moving part to setup and operate - highly available
- 73. @crichardson Pattern: Server-side discovery Service Client Router Service Registry Service Instance A Service Instance B Service Instance C 10.4.3.1:8756 10.4.3.99:4545 10.4.3.20:333 register query request request load balance
- 75. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Simpler client code Built-in to some cloud/ container environments, e.g. AWS ELB, Kubernetes, Marathon Drawbacks Limited to (generic) load balancing algorithms provided by router More network hops Router and Service Registry is yet another moving part to setup and operate - highly available
- 76. @crichardson The problem of registration Service Registry Service Instance A Service Instance B Service Instance C 10.4.3.1:8756 10.4.3.99:4545 10.4.3.20:333 register How does registration happen?
- 77. @crichardson
- 78. @crichardson Forces Service instances must be registered with the service registry on startup unregistered on shutdown Service instances that crash must be unregistered from the service registry Service instances that are running but incapable of handling requests must be unregistered from the service registry
- 79. @crichardson Pattern: Self registration Service Registry Service Instance A 10.4.3.1:8756 register heart-beat unregister
- 80. @crichardson Examples NetïŹix Eureka Java client API for registering/unregistering with Eureka server Specify state: STARTING, UP, DOWN, OUT_OF_SERVICE Register a periodically invoked health check callback Zookeeper-based Java applications Service = znode Service instance = ephemeral child of znode
- 81. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Simple - no extra components Service can implement a more sophisticated state model Drawbacks Couples the service to service registry Must implement registration logic in multiple languages/ frameworks Service might lack the self- awareness to unregister itself
- 82. @crichardson Pattern: 3rd party registration Service Registry Service Instance A 10.4.3.1:8756 register heart-beat unregister Registrar healthcheck
- 83. @crichardson Examples AWS Autoscaling groups Automatically register/unregister EC2 instance with ELB Registrator Registers and unregisters Docker containers with service registry Kubernetes/Marathon Automatically register/unregister services NetïŹix Eureka Prana Sidecar application for non-Java clients Registers/unregisters service with Eureka Performs health checks
- 84. BeneïŹts and drawbacks BeneïŹts Simpler service Registrar can perform health checks Some cloud/container environments provide a Registrar Drawbacks Registrar is yet another component that must be setup/operated. Must be highly available
- 85. @crichardson Summary: Patterns and pattern languages are a great way to ⊠Think about technology Discuss technology Apply technology
- 86. @crichardson Summary: The Microservices pattern language is a great way to ⊠Think about microservices Discuss microservices Apply microservices (or not)