Demystifying Digital Deposit
Download as PPT, PDF2 likes1,313 views
The document discusses the need and potential of a digital deposit system for the Federal Depository Library Program (FDLP), emphasizing that the medium of content is less important than its integrity, preservability, and usability. A digital deposit system would enhance public access through redundancy and variety in collections while enabling libraries to build richer services and user-centered collections. It highlights the urgency of transitioning to digital collections to prevent the loss of digital information and encourages the involvement of libraries in preserving government documents.
![Rebecca Blakeley [email_address] James A. Jacobs [email_address] Free Government Information Website http://freegovinfo.info](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/digdep-091017214207-phpapp02/85/Demystifying-Digital-Deposit-51-320.jpg)
Demystifying Digital Deposit
- 1. What It Is and What It Could Do for the Future of the FDLP Demystifying Digital Deposit
- 3. "Deposit" is real, not "virtual"
- 4. “ tangible” vs “online” or “electronic”
- 5. “ tangible” vs “online” or “electronic” “ Information conveyed on a physical medium .”
- 6. “ tangible” vs “online” or “electronic”
- 7. “ tangible” vs “online” or “electronic” So: “Tangible” is not a useful, practical, or effective criterion for determining whether any given content should or should not be deposited.
- 8. What should or should not be available for deposit? What matters is not the medium, but: Integrity of the Content Preservability Usability “ tangible” vs “online” or “electronic”
- 9. Digital Deposit ≠ “backup”
- 10. A "backup” is just a copy of data intended to be used to restore the original after loss or corruption of the original.
- 11. Digital Deposit ≠ “mirror”
- 12. Digital Depository A library that accepts digital files distributed by the GPO and builds its own unique digital collections that, in conjunction with its own physical and other digital collections, meet the needs of its users.
- 13. Digital Depository Service Access Collections A Designated user community
- 14. Why we need a digital depository system I. FDLP Content
- 15. I. Digital Deposit FDLP Content A digital depository system that provided replication and redundancy of content would create additional assurance of long-term, free public access that no single system can provide alone.
- 16. I. Digital Deposit FDLP Content A digital depository system would provide protection against financial risks that no single system can provide alone.
- 17. I. Digital Deposit FDLP Content A digital depository system that relies on a wide variety of technical solutions will reduce the risk of technological failure that no single system solution can provide.
- 18. I. Digital Deposit FDLP Content A digital depository system will include many libraries – each with its own mission, its own designated user community, its own collection (and weeding) policies, its own services and policies. No single library can provide such variety and abundance.
- 19. Why we need a digital depository system II. Rich Collections, Rich Services
- 20. II. Rich Collections, Rich Services Digital Deposit will enable libraries to combine FDLP content with non-FDLP content. These collections will be user-centered rather than based on provenance.
- 21. II. Rich Collections, Rich Services Digital Deposit will enable libraries to create new services, interfaces, indexes, and views of information. Services based on user-interest not producer-mission.
- 26. What would Digital Deposit look like? The big picture!
- 27. What would Digital Deposit look like? The big picture!
- 29. How Digital Deposit Would Work From GPO’s Point of View FDsys
- 30. How Digital Deposit Would Work From The Library’s Point of View SELECTION Item numbers Sudocs numbers Agency Publication type / Frequency / etc. File type / format Subject Full Text keywords, names
- 31. How Digital Deposit Would Work From The Library’s Point of View ACQUISITION Get files that match your profile FTP’d by GPO to your FTP site or FTP files from GPO’s FTP site. Use OAI-PMH to automatically select profile matches from everything at GPO’s OAI site Set up one or more customized RSS feeds for different profiles. Have different subject selectors review them for acquisition Acquire individual titles directly from FDsys
- 34. Yup, that’s it.
- 35. Methods of storing documents locally File system on PC Web site Institutional Repository (DSpace, Fedora) Outsourcing/partners (OCLC, IA) Other specialized software (LOCKSS) Expanding purview of existing archives (Portico, JSTOR, HathiTrust)
- 37. How Might Digital Deposit Look The User’s Point of View http://purl.access.gpo.gov/GPO/LPS37972
- 38. How Might Digital Deposit Look The User’s Point of View Preliminary transcript: Copy on Committee web site Original GPO copy Local Library copy of GPO original
- 39. Digital Collections Are Inevitable Information is increasingly digital only. All Library collections will be increasingly digital.
- 40. Digital Collections Are Inevitable Service Access Collections A Designated user community
- 41. Digital Collections Are Inevitable FDLP content is easy to add (no copyright, not DRM). FDLP can enrich your digital collection. Digital collections and network access allow us to concentrate on new communities of interest (no geographic limits!)
- 42. Digital Collections Are Inevitable Digital information is in danger of being lost if we do not act now. No one library or single institution can save everything. The question we have to ask is: Who will decide what we keep and what we weed?
- 43. Digital Collections Are Inevitable Results from the 2005 & 2007 Biennial Survey show that a significant proportion of FDLs are interested in building digital collections. 2005: 163 libraries were “systematically downloading” files 2007: 37.78% said they “want to receive PDFs if GPO deposited them”.
- 45. States Are Active! In a recent survey of best practices by those who are responsible for permanent public access to state documents, respondents said they were actively preserving documents using a variety of solutions: ArchivalWare Archive-It ContentDM DSpace digitool EPrints ex libris iRODS LOCKSS SendSpace Sirsi/Dynix & OCLC
- 46. LOCKSS
- 48. Benefits of Digital Deposit For GPO : more partners; more visibility; better preservation; more leverage w/Congress. For FDLP content : better preservation with lots of copies with many curators. For FDLP : new incentives to stay in the program; revitalized community of libraries. For individual FD Libraries : better collections; more flexible services; new user communities. For users : Focused collections, better access, new and better services.
- 49. The time is now.
- 50. Digital Deposit Documents to the People!
- 51. Rebecca Blakeley [email_address] James A. Jacobs [email_address] Free Government Information Website http://freegovinfo.info