SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Design of Deck Slab & Girders
Design Example:
Design a RCC T beam girder bridge to suit the following data
Clear width of roadway – 7.5 m
Span (c/c of bearings) – 16 m
Live load – IRC class AA tracked vehicle
Average thickness of wearing coat – 80 mm
Concrete mix – M25
Steel – Fe415 grade HYSD bars
Using Courbon’s method, compute the design moments and
shear forces and design the deck slab, main girder and cross
girder and sketch the typical details of reinforcements.
2
Design of Deck Slab
3
1. Permissible stresses:
Permissible flexural compressive stress (σcb) = 8.3 Mpa (table 9 of IRC
21-2000)
Permissible stress for Fe415 (σst) = 200 Mpa (table 10 of IRC 21-2000)
The modular ratio can be adopted as m = 10
Lever arm factor (j) =
Moment factor (Q) = 0.5 σcb nj = 0.5x8.3x0.9x0.293 = 1.09
4







3
n
1
9
.
0
3
293
.
0
1
j
293
.
0
3
.
8
x
10
200
1
1
m
1
1
n
cb
st








































2. Cross section of the deck:
5
2.5 m
2.5 m
4.0 m 4.0 m 4.0 m 4.0 m
The depth of cross girder is taken as equal to the depth of main
girder to simplify the computations
2. Cross section of the deck:
6
0.08 m thick wearing coat
0.2 m
0.6 m
1.85 m 2.5 m 2.5 m
7.5 m
0.3 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
0.3 m
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Bending moments
Dead weight of slab = (1x1x0.2x24) = 4.8 kN/m2
Dead weight of wc = (1x1x0.08x22) = 1.76 kN/m2
Total dead load = 4.8+1.76 = 6.56 kN/m2
7
B=2.5
m
L=4.0 m
3.60 m
0.85
m
u=1.01
m
v=3.76 m
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Bending moments (live load)
u/B = 1.01/2.5 = 0.404
v/L = 3.76/4.0 = 0.94
K=(B/L)=2.5/4.0=0.625
From Pigeaud’s curves m1=0.085 and m2=0.024
8
Pigeaud's curves are based on the elastic analysis of thin isotrpoic plates
with simple supports on all the four sides. However, a deck slab cannot be
idealised as simply supported panel. The process of reducing Pigeaud‘s
moment values by 20% and assuming equal and support moments is
highly conservative. The deck slab behaves as a fixed slab for the usual
beam sizes of a bridge.
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Bending moments (live load)
Bending moment in the short span direction (MS)
MS=(m1+μm2)W=(0.085+0.15x0.024)350 = 31.01 kNm
Bending moment in the long span direction (ML)
ML=(m2+μm1)W=(0.024+0.15x0.085)350 = 12.845 kNm
The design bending moment over an intermediate support of a
continuous deck supported on bearings may be calculated by
equation.
M1 = (M – qa2/8) or 0.8M, whichever is greater,
where, M, = Design bending moment.
9
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Bending moments (live load)
Design bending moment including impact in the short span
direction (MS) = 1.25x0.8x31.01 = 31.01 kNm
Design bending moment including impact in the longer span
direction (ML) = 1.25x0.8x12.845 = 12.845 kNm
Bending moments (dead loads)
Dead load = 6.56 kN/m2
Total load on panel = (4x2.5x6.56) = 65.6 kN
u/B = 1.0; v/L = 1.0 as the panel is loaded with uniformly
distributed load.
K=(B/L)=2.5/4.0=0.625 and 1/K = 1.6
From Pigeaud’s curves m1=0.049 and m2=0.015
Bending moment in the short span direction (MS)
MS=(m1+μm2)W=(0.049+0.15x0.015)65.6 = 3.36 kNm
Bending moment in the long span direction (ML)
ML=(m2+μm1)W=(0.015+0.15x0.049)65.6 = 1.468 kNm
10
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Bending moments (dead load)
Design bending moment in the short span direction
(MS) = 0.8x3.36 = 2.688 kNm
Design bending moment in the longer span direction
(ML) = 0.8x1.468 = 1.174 kNm
Total design bending moments in the short span
(MS) = 31.01+2.688 = 33.698 kNm
Total design bending moments in the long span
(ML) = 12.845+1.174 = 14.019 kNm
11
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Shear forces
Dispersion in the direction of span = 0.85+2(0.08+0.2) = 1.41 m
For max. shear, load is kept such that the whole dispersion is in
span. The load is kept at 1.41/2 = 0.705 m from the edge of
beam.
12
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Shear forces
Breadth of girder = 0.3 m
Clear length of panel (L’) = 4.0-2(0.15) = 3.70 m
Clear breadth of panel (B’) = 2.5-2(0.15) = 2.2 m
(B’/L’) = 2.2/3.7 = 0.6
‘K’ for continuous slab is 1.84 (IRC 21-2000)
Effective width of slab = 1.84x0.705(1-0.705/2.2)+3.76 = 4.64 m
Load per meter width = 350/4.64 = 75.4 kN
Shear force = 75.4(2.2-0.705)/2.2 = 51.23 kN
Shear force with impact = 1.25x51.23 = 64 kN
Dead load shear force = 6.56x2.2/2 = 7.21 kN
Total shear force = 64+7.21 = 71.21 kN
13
3. Design of interior slab panel:
Design of section
Effective depth
Adopt overall depth = 200 mm
Area of tension reinforcement is given by
Similarly calculate reinforcement in longer span direction
14
mm
175
1000
x
1
.
1
10
x
698
.
33
Qb
M
d
6



2
6
st
st mm
1170
175
x
9
.
0
x
200
10
x
698
.
33
jd
M
A 



3. Design of interior slab panel:
Check for shear stress
Nominal shear stress
15
2
mm
/
N
4
.
0
175
x
1000
1000
x
21
.
71
bd
V




3. Design of interior slab panel:
Check for shear stress
16
Maximum permissible shear
stress
Permissible shear stress
Hence safe in permissible
limits
2
max mm
/
N
9
.
1


2
c mm
/
N
36
.
0


Design of Girders
17
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Dead loads from slab for girder
18
0.2 m
0.6 m
1.85 m 2.5 m 2.5 m
0.3 m
1.0 m
1.4 m
0.3 m
W1 W2
W
1.2+2(0.85)
=2.05m
Axis of
bridge
CG of
loads
e=1.1 m
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Dead loads from slab for girder
Weight of
1. Parapet = 2x0.7 = 1.4 kN/m
2. Wearing coat = 0.08x7.5x22 = 13.2 kN/m
3. Deck slab = 0.2x7.5x24 = 36 kN/m
4. Kerb = 2(0.5x0.6x24) = 14.4 kN/m
Total dead load = 1.4+13.2+36+14.4 = 65 kN/m
It is assumed that the dead load is equally shared by all girders.
Dead load per girder = 65/3 = 21.66 kN/m
19
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Reaction factors
Using Courbon’s method, the reaction factors are calculated as
follows:
Where, Rx= Reaction factor for the girder under consideration
I = Moment of Inertia of each longitudinal girder
dx= distance of the girder under consideration from the central
axis of the bridge
W = Total concentrated live load
n = number of longitudinal girders
e = Eccentricity of live load with respect to the axis of the
bridge.
20
























 
 e
d
I
d
I
1
n
W
R x
2
x
x
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Reaction factors
Reaction factor for outer girder
Reaction factor for inner girder
Since W1=0.5W; RA = 0.48W; RB = 0.33W;
21
1
2
1
A W
96
.
0
1
.
1
x
5
.
2
5
.
2
Ix
3
I
3
1
3
W
2
R 




















  1
1
B W
66
.
0
0
1
3
W
2
R 








4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Live load BMs
Bending moment = 4x700 = 2800 kN.m
Bending moment including impact factor and reaction factor =
Reaction factor =2800x1.25x0.48 = 1680 kNm (for outer girder)
Bending moment including impact factor and reaction factor =
Reaction factor =2800x1.25x0.33 = 1155 kNm (for inner girder)
22
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Live load Shears
Reaction on girder B = (350x0.45)/2.5=63 kN
Reaction on girder A = (350x2.05)/2.5=287 kN
Maximum reaction on girder B = (63x14.2)/16 = 56 kN
Maximum reaction on girder A = (287x14.2)/16 = 255 kN
Considering impact factor = 56x1.25 = 70 kN (girder B)
Considering impact factor = 255x1.25 = 318.75 kN (girder A)
23
4. Design of longitudinal girders:
Dead load BM and SFs
The depth of the girder is assumed as 1600 mm.
Depth of rib = 1.4 m
Width of rib = 0.3 m
Weight of rib = 1x1.4x0.3x24 = 10.08 kN/m (per meter)
The cross section is assumed to have the same cross section
dimension of main girder.
Hence weight of cross girder = 10.08 kN/m (per meter)
Reaction on main girder = 10.08x2.5 = 25.2 kN
24
10.08 kN/m
25

More Related Content

PDF
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
PDF
Concrete bridge-design-to-bs5400
PPT
Tension coefficient method
PPTX
Design of RCC Column footing
PDF
Rc corbel example
PPTX
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
PDF
How to model and analyse structures using etabs
PDF
Is 1343 2012
23-Design of Column Base Plates (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
Concrete bridge-design-to-bs5400
Tension coefficient method
Design of RCC Column footing
Rc corbel example
Numerical problem and solution on pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) ( usefuls...
How to model and analyse structures using etabs
Is 1343 2012

What's hot (20)

PDF
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
PPT
Fundamentals of structural analysis
PPTX
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
PDF
Design calculations of raft foundation
PDF
19-Examples for Beam Column (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
PDF
Structural analysis 2
PPTX
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
PDF
Structural engineering i
PDF
Method of joints
PPTX
Plastic analysis
PDF
Lecture 2( Moment distribution method with sway)
PDF
Lecture 2 bearing capacity
PPTX
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
PPTX
Design Of Continuous Beams 30_8.pptx
PPTX
Best numerical problem group pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
PPT
Analysis of three hinge parabolic arches
DOCX
Preliminary design of column
PDF
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajape
PPTX
PPTX
Slope deflection method
Design of two way slabs(d.d.m.)
Fundamentals of structural analysis
Numerical Question on Terzaghi Bearing Capacity Theory, Meyerhof Bearing Capa...
Design calculations of raft foundation
19-Examples for Beam Column (Steel Structural Design & Prof. Shehab Mourad)
Structural analysis 2
Question and Answers on Terzaghi’s Bearing Capacity Theory (usefulsearch.org)...
Structural engineering i
Method of joints
Plastic analysis
Lecture 2( Moment distribution method with sway)
Lecture 2 bearing capacity
Singly reinforced beam ast - over reinforced
Design Of Continuous Beams 30_8.pptx
Best numerical problem group pile capacity (usefulsearch.org) (useful search)
Analysis of three hinge parabolic arches
Preliminary design of column
Unit 3 flexibility-anujajape
Slope deflection method
Ad

Similar to DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING (20)

PPTX
Design ppt
PPTX
Rectangular tank
PPTX
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
PPT
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
PPT
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
PPT
Lec 13-14-15
PPT
3248602.ppt read it everyone pls engineer
PPTX
Design of Steel Structure From Dr.R.Baskar
PPTX
Guntry girder
PPT
Engineerring of designing portalFrame.ppt
DOCX
PDF
Lecture No.6 -8 and 9-ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIGDES.pdf
DOC
10346 07 08 examination paper
PPT
14730960.pptdkyjt77777755555555588888888
DOCX
Composite beams-and-slabs1
PPTX
PortalFrame slide, bracing and descriptions
PDF
PDF
CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL FOR CIVIL ENGINEER
PPTX
presentation1_28.pptx
PPTX
Design of composite steel and concrete structures.pptx
Design ppt
Rectangular tank
Analysis and Design of Residential building.pptx
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15-flexural analysis and design of beams-2007-r
Lec 13-14-15
3248602.ppt read it everyone pls engineer
Design of Steel Structure From Dr.R.Baskar
Guntry girder
Engineerring of designing portalFrame.ppt
Lecture No.6 -8 and 9-ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF BRIGDES.pdf
10346 07 08 examination paper
14730960.pptdkyjt77777755555555588888888
Composite beams-and-slabs1
PortalFrame slide, bracing and descriptions
CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL FOR CIVIL ENGINEER
presentation1_28.pptx
Design of composite steel and concrete structures.pptx
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
composite construction of structures.pdf
PDF
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
PPTX
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
PPTX
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
PDF
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
PPTX
IOT PPTs Week 10 Lecture Material.pptx of NPTEL Smart Cities contd
PPTX
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
PDF
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
PPTX
Welding lecture in detail for understanding
PDF
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
PPTX
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
PDF
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
PPTX
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
PDF
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
PDF
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
PPTX
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
PPTX
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
PPTX
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
PPTX
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
PPTX
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction
composite construction of structures.pdf
Operating System & Kernel Study Guide-1 - converted.pdf
Engineering Ethics, Safety and Environment [Autosaved] (1).pptx
Infosys Presentation by1.Riyan Bagwan 2.Samadhan Naiknavare 3.Gaurav Shinde 4...
Model Code of Practice - Construction Work - 21102022 .pdf
IOT PPTs Week 10 Lecture Material.pptx of NPTEL Smart Cities contd
Geodesy 1.pptx...............................................
The CXO Playbook 2025 – Future-Ready Strategies for C-Suite Leaders Cerebrai...
Welding lecture in detail for understanding
Evaluating the Democratization of the Turkish Armed Forces from a Normative P...
bas. eng. economics group 4 presentation 1.pptx
SM_6th-Sem__Cse_Internet-of-Things.pdf IOT
Foundation to blockchain - A guide to Blockchain Tech
BMEC211 - INTRODUCTION TO MECHATRONICS-1.pdf
Mitigating Risks through Effective Management for Enhancing Organizational Pe...
MET 305 2019 SCHEME MODULE 2 COMPLETE.pptx
Lecture Notes Electrical Wiring System Components
Internet of Things (IOT) - A guide to understanding
CH1 Production IntroductoryConcepts.pptx
Sustainable Sites - Green Building Construction

DESIGN OF DECK SLAB AND GIRDERS- BRIDGE ENGINEERING

  • 1. Design of Deck Slab & Girders
  • 2. Design Example: Design a RCC T beam girder bridge to suit the following data Clear width of roadway – 7.5 m Span (c/c of bearings) – 16 m Live load – IRC class AA tracked vehicle Average thickness of wearing coat – 80 mm Concrete mix – M25 Steel – Fe415 grade HYSD bars Using Courbon’s method, compute the design moments and shear forces and design the deck slab, main girder and cross girder and sketch the typical details of reinforcements. 2
  • 3. Design of Deck Slab 3
  • 4. 1. Permissible stresses: Permissible flexural compressive stress (σcb) = 8.3 Mpa (table 9 of IRC 21-2000) Permissible stress for Fe415 (σst) = 200 Mpa (table 10 of IRC 21-2000) The modular ratio can be adopted as m = 10 Lever arm factor (j) = Moment factor (Q) = 0.5 σcb nj = 0.5x8.3x0.9x0.293 = 1.09 4        3 n 1 9 . 0 3 293 . 0 1 j 293 . 0 3 . 8 x 10 200 1 1 m 1 1 n cb st                                        
  • 5. 2. Cross section of the deck: 5 2.5 m 2.5 m 4.0 m 4.0 m 4.0 m 4.0 m The depth of cross girder is taken as equal to the depth of main girder to simplify the computations
  • 6. 2. Cross section of the deck: 6 0.08 m thick wearing coat 0.2 m 0.6 m 1.85 m 2.5 m 2.5 m 7.5 m 0.3 m 1.0 m 1.4 m 0.3 m
  • 7. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Bending moments Dead weight of slab = (1x1x0.2x24) = 4.8 kN/m2 Dead weight of wc = (1x1x0.08x22) = 1.76 kN/m2 Total dead load = 4.8+1.76 = 6.56 kN/m2 7 B=2.5 m L=4.0 m 3.60 m 0.85 m u=1.01 m v=3.76 m
  • 8. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Bending moments (live load) u/B = 1.01/2.5 = 0.404 v/L = 3.76/4.0 = 0.94 K=(B/L)=2.5/4.0=0.625 From Pigeaud’s curves m1=0.085 and m2=0.024 8 Pigeaud's curves are based on the elastic analysis of thin isotrpoic plates with simple supports on all the four sides. However, a deck slab cannot be idealised as simply supported panel. The process of reducing Pigeaud‘s moment values by 20% and assuming equal and support moments is highly conservative. The deck slab behaves as a fixed slab for the usual beam sizes of a bridge.
  • 9. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Bending moments (live load) Bending moment in the short span direction (MS) MS=(m1+μm2)W=(0.085+0.15x0.024)350 = 31.01 kNm Bending moment in the long span direction (ML) ML=(m2+μm1)W=(0.024+0.15x0.085)350 = 12.845 kNm The design bending moment over an intermediate support of a continuous deck supported on bearings may be calculated by equation. M1 = (M – qa2/8) or 0.8M, whichever is greater, where, M, = Design bending moment. 9
  • 10. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Bending moments (live load) Design bending moment including impact in the short span direction (MS) = 1.25x0.8x31.01 = 31.01 kNm Design bending moment including impact in the longer span direction (ML) = 1.25x0.8x12.845 = 12.845 kNm Bending moments (dead loads) Dead load = 6.56 kN/m2 Total load on panel = (4x2.5x6.56) = 65.6 kN u/B = 1.0; v/L = 1.0 as the panel is loaded with uniformly distributed load. K=(B/L)=2.5/4.0=0.625 and 1/K = 1.6 From Pigeaud’s curves m1=0.049 and m2=0.015 Bending moment in the short span direction (MS) MS=(m1+μm2)W=(0.049+0.15x0.015)65.6 = 3.36 kNm Bending moment in the long span direction (ML) ML=(m2+μm1)W=(0.015+0.15x0.049)65.6 = 1.468 kNm 10
  • 11. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Bending moments (dead load) Design bending moment in the short span direction (MS) = 0.8x3.36 = 2.688 kNm Design bending moment in the longer span direction (ML) = 0.8x1.468 = 1.174 kNm Total design bending moments in the short span (MS) = 31.01+2.688 = 33.698 kNm Total design bending moments in the long span (ML) = 12.845+1.174 = 14.019 kNm 11
  • 12. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Shear forces Dispersion in the direction of span = 0.85+2(0.08+0.2) = 1.41 m For max. shear, load is kept such that the whole dispersion is in span. The load is kept at 1.41/2 = 0.705 m from the edge of beam. 12
  • 13. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Shear forces Breadth of girder = 0.3 m Clear length of panel (L’) = 4.0-2(0.15) = 3.70 m Clear breadth of panel (B’) = 2.5-2(0.15) = 2.2 m (B’/L’) = 2.2/3.7 = 0.6 ‘K’ for continuous slab is 1.84 (IRC 21-2000) Effective width of slab = 1.84x0.705(1-0.705/2.2)+3.76 = 4.64 m Load per meter width = 350/4.64 = 75.4 kN Shear force = 75.4(2.2-0.705)/2.2 = 51.23 kN Shear force with impact = 1.25x51.23 = 64 kN Dead load shear force = 6.56x2.2/2 = 7.21 kN Total shear force = 64+7.21 = 71.21 kN 13
  • 14. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Design of section Effective depth Adopt overall depth = 200 mm Area of tension reinforcement is given by Similarly calculate reinforcement in longer span direction 14 mm 175 1000 x 1 . 1 10 x 698 . 33 Qb M d 6    2 6 st st mm 1170 175 x 9 . 0 x 200 10 x 698 . 33 jd M A    
  • 15. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Check for shear stress Nominal shear stress 15 2 mm / N 4 . 0 175 x 1000 1000 x 21 . 71 bd V    
  • 16. 3. Design of interior slab panel: Check for shear stress 16 Maximum permissible shear stress Permissible shear stress Hence safe in permissible limits 2 max mm / N 9 . 1   2 c mm / N 36 . 0  
  • 18. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Dead loads from slab for girder 18 0.2 m 0.6 m 1.85 m 2.5 m 2.5 m 0.3 m 1.0 m 1.4 m 0.3 m W1 W2 W 1.2+2(0.85) =2.05m Axis of bridge CG of loads e=1.1 m
  • 19. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Dead loads from slab for girder Weight of 1. Parapet = 2x0.7 = 1.4 kN/m 2. Wearing coat = 0.08x7.5x22 = 13.2 kN/m 3. Deck slab = 0.2x7.5x24 = 36 kN/m 4. Kerb = 2(0.5x0.6x24) = 14.4 kN/m Total dead load = 1.4+13.2+36+14.4 = 65 kN/m It is assumed that the dead load is equally shared by all girders. Dead load per girder = 65/3 = 21.66 kN/m 19
  • 20. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Reaction factors Using Courbon’s method, the reaction factors are calculated as follows: Where, Rx= Reaction factor for the girder under consideration I = Moment of Inertia of each longitudinal girder dx= distance of the girder under consideration from the central axis of the bridge W = Total concentrated live load n = number of longitudinal girders e = Eccentricity of live load with respect to the axis of the bridge. 20                            e d I d I 1 n W R x 2 x x
  • 21. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Reaction factors Reaction factor for outer girder Reaction factor for inner girder Since W1=0.5W; RA = 0.48W; RB = 0.33W; 21 1 2 1 A W 96 . 0 1 . 1 x 5 . 2 5 . 2 Ix 3 I 3 1 3 W 2 R                        1 1 B W 66 . 0 0 1 3 W 2 R         
  • 22. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Live load BMs Bending moment = 4x700 = 2800 kN.m Bending moment including impact factor and reaction factor = Reaction factor =2800x1.25x0.48 = 1680 kNm (for outer girder) Bending moment including impact factor and reaction factor = Reaction factor =2800x1.25x0.33 = 1155 kNm (for inner girder) 22
  • 23. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Live load Shears Reaction on girder B = (350x0.45)/2.5=63 kN Reaction on girder A = (350x2.05)/2.5=287 kN Maximum reaction on girder B = (63x14.2)/16 = 56 kN Maximum reaction on girder A = (287x14.2)/16 = 255 kN Considering impact factor = 56x1.25 = 70 kN (girder B) Considering impact factor = 255x1.25 = 318.75 kN (girder A) 23
  • 24. 4. Design of longitudinal girders: Dead load BM and SFs The depth of the girder is assumed as 1600 mm. Depth of rib = 1.4 m Width of rib = 0.3 m Weight of rib = 1x1.4x0.3x24 = 10.08 kN/m (per meter) The cross section is assumed to have the same cross section dimension of main girder. Hence weight of cross girder = 10.08 kN/m (per meter) Reaction on main girder = 10.08x2.5 = 25.2 kN 24 10.08 kN/m
  • 25. 25

Editor's Notes