Despatches summer-2020 Battlefield Guides

DESPATCHES
Summer 2020
www.gbg-international.com
IN THIS ISSUE:
Guiding Through Quarantine
Lone Star Guide
Tracking a Lancaster
Picture Guide
PLUS
Photojournalist Guide
AND
Wotjek the Bear

FIELDguides
02 | Despatches www.gbg-international.com | 03
FIRSTcontact:
www.facebook.com/battleguide
twitter.com/GuildofBG
www.Instagram.com/guild_bg
Guild Chairman
Mike Peters
chairman@gbg-
international.com
Material for publication in the Autumn
edition of ‘Despatches’ must be with
the Editor no later than 30 August
2020. This is a deadline and
submissions should be sent as far in
advance as possible.
All material should be sent via Guild
Secretary Tim Stoneman at:
secretary@gbg-international.com
Guild Membership
Secretary - Tony Smith
mbr.sec@gbg-
international.com
Guild Secretary
Tim Stoneman
secretary@gbg-
international.com
Contents
P2 FIELDguides
P5-7 BATTLEFIELD GUIDING
and the COVID-19 CRISIS
The experience of a fulltime guide
P8-12 ‘DON’T MESS WITH
TEXAS’
Texan war of Independence 1835-36
P13-16 INVESTIGATING THE
LOSS OF PB 812
Using good sources
P17-20 LOCAL LOCKDOWN
MONUMENT TOUR
Close to home and Dover
P21-28 PICTURES THAT PAINT
A THOUSAND WORDS
P29-34 PHOTOJOURNALIST
GUIDE
Part One
P35-36 A BATTLEFIELD STUDY
Virtually
P37-38 WOTJEK THE POLISH
MILITARY BEAR
An unusual soldier
P39-40 PB 812 SOURCE GUIDE
P41-43 GUIDEbooks
P43 EVENTguide 2020/21
Lancaster LM363postscript Tony Smith
Back in Spring 2014 I wrote an article for
‘Despatches’ in which I told the story of the crew
of Lancaster LM363 which failed to return from a
raid on Berlin on the 2nd December 1943. The
aircraft was piloted by Flight Lieutenant George
Frazer-Hollins, an experienced 31-year-old pilot
with 24 missions under his belt.
As the article mentions, my interest in the
Lancaster and its crew had come about after I
purchased George’s DFC medal group from a
dealer some years ago. I had researched each of the
lives of the crew members and with the help of
Guild member, Willem Kleijn, had pieced together
the story of their last fateful raid. What I did not
know at the time was where that article would lead.
It was over two years later when, out of the
blue, I received an e-mail from fellow member
Iain Standen. He had been contacted by a member
of George Frazer-Hollins’ family who had seen
the ‘Despatches’ article on the internet. The
family was very keen to buy the medals back from
me if I would be willing to sell them.
After some thought I agreed and it was decided
that the family would ‘swap’ the group for a
similar set which, as luck would have it, was up
for sale on eBay. This they duly purchased and on
a cold January day I met with the family at a hotel
just off the A303.
At that meeting I met with George’s son, only a
baby at the time that his father was killed, and he
showed me letters and documents about George
including photographs of him. Up until then I had
never been able to find a photograph of George.
They also did not know the full details of the final
mission which between myself and Willem we had
been able to fill in.
It was quite an emotional meeting. It was
explained that George’s widow had been forced to
sell the medals in the ‘50s when times were hard.
The family however had always kept George’s
memory alive and that it was by chance that they
had seen my article. Now they were to be reunited
with George’s medals. They told me that they were
now going to draw up a legal contract to ensure
that the medals would never leave the family again.
Having heard the family’s story, I was glad that
I had I had been able to reunite them with the
medals and that between us - myself, Willem and
Iain had been able to contribute a little more to
their family history.
Cover image: Rainbow over the Messines © Mike Sheils
(See article page 29)
Photos:BattleHonoursBattlefieldToursLtd
Battle Honours have been looking closer to home - Defence of the Realm Weekend
Often fleetingly glimpsed from the deck of a cross channel ferry, Dover offers a rich military heritage making it the ideal
location for a short military history break.
Led by badged guides Tony Scott and
Clive Harris, the weekend includes a
walk around the town of Dover,
taking in memorials and historic sites
to tell the story of Dover at War, this
is followed by a walk along the
eastern cliffs discovering wartime
defences, cross channel guns sites and
the Chain Home early warning system
before ending at the Dover Patrol
Memorial and a seaside pub.
The following day includes a walk
along the western cliffs pausing at
sound ranging equipment and
numerous pill boxes overlooking the
English Channel. We complete the day
with visits to the Capel-Le-Ferne
Battle of Britain Memorial, the
historic Royal Military Canal and
Shorncliffe Military Cemetery. We are
currently costing the tour and as GBG
Partners, we will of course offer
members a discount on the package.
Details will follow soon.

Hello Fellow Guild Members and Guild Partners, I
hope that this bumper issue of ‘Despatches’ finds you
all in good health. I also hope that you like our
amazing cover picture, generously provided by long
time GBG member, Mike Sheil. As Editor, I am
grateful to Mike and to all of the other members who
responded to my appeal for content a few weeks ago.
It is testament to the depth and variety of knowledge
within our unique organisation that we have been
able to compile another excellent issue. Looking
ahead, the Autumn ‘Despatches’ is already looking
very healthy. Thank you to everyone who contributed
articles, I will use them all.
Given current events, the cover image of a rainbow
over Messines seemed appropriate…as we go to print,
all of the talk is of a return to the new ‘normality’ that
we all crave. The Travel Industry has of course
suffered terribly, and we all face an array of new
practical challenges related to the nitty, gritty detail of
planning and delivering even the most basic battlefield
tours. The biggest challenge will no doubt be costing a
tour. The associated costs of administering a tour have
changed beyond recognition. European members will
already have scoped the hike in cross-channel prices
by ferry or train. All of these variables will hopefully
begin to settle in the next few months, most of the
major battlefield tour operators in Australia, the USA,
the UK and Canada have abandoned touring until
next year. Let us all hope for a vaccine soon.
One thing is certain, our industry has already
become a far more competitive arena. The inevitable
decline in the volume and diversity of our client base,
additional costs and constantly changing regulation
of travel make for a much more complex market.
Quality will be the key to survival, it will I feel be
even more a buyers’ market than before. This is why
GBG membership and what it implies will be even
more important than ever in the coming months.
Those of you who have used your time in lockdown
to gain accreditation have certainly done your
prospects and your guiding profile no harm. The
same can be said for those members who have
adapted innovative methods to maintain a market
foothold should be commended. I am thinking of
Steve Hunnisett’s virtual blitz walks and Dan Hill’s
history from home projects in particular. Most of us
are aware that in the 21st century that the search
engine is all powerful, along with Trust Pilot and
TripAdvisor the discerning client and is well equipped
to research and select the guide most appropriate to
their requirements. Any slip in professional standards
or inappropriate
behaviour on social
media will
undoubtably come
home to roost.
This new reality
has focused the minds of the GBG Management
Board, we have been working behind the scenes to
futureproof your guild. You can see evidence of the
output in the form of detailed weekly bulletins,
ongoing changes to the website, virtual validation
sessions and many other proactive measures and
programmes of work. We are alive to the threats
posed by COVID-19, Brexit and the prospect of
economic downturn. As a board we are working hard
to ensure that membership is worthwhile in personal
terms, as well as good value for money. The process
is ongoing, please take the time to review the changes
that you can see in the areas of Accreditation,
Governance and Events. If you have not registered on
the website already, please do it now – it is a great
shared portal for us all. Those who are accredited
members, please review your bio and refresh it if you
think that is required.
In line with our efforts to sustain the GBG through
the current crisis we have made a number of changes
in some of the guild’s key posts. As previously
announced, Tim Stoneman has moved from his post
as the Validation Secretary, he has recently been
appointed as our new Guild Secretary. Tim has been
replaced as Validation Secretary by Andy Johnson; I
am sure that you all wish them both well as they
settle into their respective new seats. The board also
thanks John Harris for all of his previous hard work
as Guild Secretary. I also wish to publicly thank Tony
Smith for his contribution as the continuity link for
the board during the transition period.
I think that you have heard enough from me, I
hope that you will enjoy this latest copy of
‘Despatches’. There is still some space left in the next
issue should you wish to share your knowledge and
experience, that is after all what the Guild is all
about. Now more than ever, we all need to support
each other, maintain our bonds of friendship, and
help each other when we can. Don’t forget, when
meet back out on the battlefields, give each other a
socially distant wave, and say hello to each other.
I hope that you enjoy your magazine.
Mike Peters
Chairman
04 | Despatches www.gbg-international.com | 05
OPENINGshot:
THE CHAIRMAN’S VIEW
BATTLEFIELD GUIDING AND
THE COVID-19 CRISIS
The personal experience from a fulltime battlefield guide
Edwin Popken MA
It was Tuesday morning, 16 June 2020 around 8.30. The computer sounded a ‘you have
new mail’ signal and I routinely checked it. I had woken up earlier that morning around
7am, expecting it to be just another day in this now dreary COVID-19 crisis that had
violently swept my diary clean of all tours and talks I had planned until the end of July. Some
twelve weeks into the lockdown - or had it already been more? - I had kept up a regular daily
routine from the beginning and keeping myself busy with different activities and projects.
The Dutch government and their European
counterparts had started planning to ease lockdown
and reopening their countries again. That was good
news, but with several travel restrictions still in place
and consumers probably hesitant because of all the
vagaries, I could not see battlefield touring restarting
just yet. I opened the email and read it … and read it
again, making sure I was reading it correctly:
lockdown was easing off, a group of Dutch friends
was re-planning a trip to the Ardennes which they
had to postpone earlier due to COVID-19. They were
now planning to be there during the last weekend of
June and asked me whether I was available to do a
battlefield tour for them. Yes, of course I was!
This year had started very well for me. My diary for
this year was filled with quite a few tours and other
WW2 history activities. Like last year, I would be fully
concentrating on my WW2 history business. As from
mid-April and I had made contractual arrangements
with clients in my other line of business which I focus
on during the winter period. This year was promising
to be another very good and busy guiding season. I
was particularly looking forward to this season, given
the diversity of tours and activities planned between
the end of February and the end of October. I had
quite a nice mix of activities lined up this Spring,
including four eight-day Easy Company Tours with
the US National World War Two Museum, several
private tours, several ‘open’ tours for Dutch clients
and six training/excursion days for several general
guide companies. Apart from these tours, I was also
involved in a project bringing 150 Canadians over for
the 75th anniversary of the end of WW2 in The
Netherlands. The project involved the Canadians
walking some of the routes followed by several
Canadian divisions in The Netherlands in April/May
1945. I was providing the historical background and
landmarks for these hikes. I was to instruct the group
leaders on the narrative and would be giving several
talks as well as two battlefield tours on non-walking
days. To get these tours organised, I had enlisted the
assistance of several other GBG members. And then
there was my Viking Cruises project on top of all this.
Having worked for several months with a Destination
Management Company (DMC) which provides shore-
based activities and excursions for Viking, Viking had
asked us to give presentations for their Rhine cruises
while moored at Arnhem or Nijmegen. Around 38
talks had been planned until the end of August and
more yet during Autumn. To get these presentations
organised, I again enlisted the help of several other
guides. As I said, I was looking at a very busy and
exciting Spring and Summer season.
Then COVID-19 came! As countries closed their
borders and imposed lockdowns, several Viking cruises
and tours were cancelled. The more time progressed
and lockdowns extended, more cancellations followed.
The US National World War Two Museum cancelled
all their Spring tours globally, Viking discontinued their
Rhine cruises at least until 1st of September, the
Canadian project had to pull the plug as well a few
weeks later. Private tours were also cancelled as guests
were either afraid to travel or simply could not get into
Europe anymore. Within two or three weeks my entire
diary went from being very well filled to completely
empty. lockdown restrictions also prevented sourcing
alternative markets. The crisis affected the economy in
general, I was also not able to extend my contract on a
project in my other line of business. I could not get
work elsewhere: projects at clients in that line of
business were put on hold or downsized, effectively
meaning that services of external consultants such as
myself were discontinued. By mid-April, my only
project was completed and now neither line of business
was producing any income. I found myself thinking,
what next?

www.gbg-international.com | 0706 | Despatches
Initially, I took some time to get a few things done
that had been waiting to be done for a while. I guess
we all have a few things we keep putting off for one
reason or another. This seemed to be a good moment
to get at least some of these of my list. Apart from this,
the lockdown presented me with time to finally catch
up on my reading and my large pile of books-still-to-
read. There was also my new website, which had been
in the making for a while now. I had not been able to
get around to work on it for a while, but lockdown
offered me time and space for that. I took some time to
rethink how I wanted to restructure my website, what
it’s overall theme should be, how to set up different
content pages, how to implement the multi-lingual part
of the website, etcetera. And then there were some final
changes I wanted to see implemented by my website
designer. Slowly and gradually this little project started
to come along and recently, early June, I was finally
able to put the new website online.
But these activities, though useful and necessary,
did not really make up for the tours and talks that
were cancelled. At least not for me. Being a military
historian and guide, I missed being able to share
stories about World War Two and take people to
these locations. So, I started thinking about other
ways to share my knowledge and passion for these
battlefields. One of the key things I had in mind is
that I wanted to engage prospective clients in a way
that would work during the lockdown. In essence,
ways that could be done online.
Joël Stoppels’ initiative to organise several Zoom
presentations in The Netherlands – also broadcasted
on Facebook – proved to be a first opportunity to do
so. Joel invited me to give a talk on ‘Operation
Market Garden’. I decided to move off the beaten
path and discuss the participation of British VIII and
XII Corps, the problems before and during the
operation these corps were faced with and how that
affected the overall operation. A part of Operation
Market Garden mostly overlooked but so important
to understanding the operation.
My inspiration came, however, when an
acquaintance of mine contacted me early May for
local television. And I do mean local, as this is
basically our county television. Not a particularly
large audience but my acquaintance working for this
organisation, came with an interesting idea. She was
preparing a news special on the 75th
commemoration of the end of the war in The
Netherlands – May 5th – in our village and wanted
to include a mini-documentary on several things that
happened here during the war. With little time left
before May 5th, we went to a village nearby to film
me talking about a family which was bombed well
after the area had been liberated, and the front
having moved on. To also commemorate our
liberators, we filmed at Mierlo GWGC Cemetery
where two tank crewmen are buried who died while
fighting in our village.
The small documentary got me thinking that this
was actually a nice and creative way to keep engaged
with former and potential clients. I decided to explore
this idea and contacted my mate and fellow GBG
member Joris Nieuwint, who sometimes does Easy
Company tours with me. I suggested we would make a
taster movie for a closed Facebook page run by the US
National World War Two Museum called ‘Travel at
NWW2M’. The page basically functions as a place
where staff, guides and former travellers can share
WW2 travel content and is part of the museum’s
ongoing activities to engage with their travellers. Our
plan was to do a video, taking the viewers to the places
we normally visit during the tour and give a little
preview of what we do at these sites. After two days of
filming on different locations, a lot of takes – we
sometimes had to do more than ten takes to get a good
one – a lot of goof-ups, and tons of laughter and fun
we finally had the basic material. The next thing was
editing and creating a 10-minute movie. This step took
many hours of selecting, cutting, pasting, selecting
soundtracks and supporting photos in the video,
etcetera. But finally, the video was ready and after
reviewing it with Joris, I uploaded it onto the facebook
page. Within a few hours the post had numerous likes
and positive comments, both from staff, people who
had already been on the tour and from future travellers
on this tour. It was a huge success.
Having been through the entire process once and
having learned much, I decided to continue. Me and
Joris decided to do another video for the museum’s
facebook page, because we had not been able not
include a stop we normally do in The Netherlands: the
Waal Crossing. We opted to take a different approach
for this video and talk in more detail about what
happened, using film footage from both sides of the
river. Saturday 20 June, we went to Nijmegen and
filmed there all day, again with the unavoidable number
of takes, out takes, laughs, etc. The video is currently
being edited and I hope to have it ready early July.
Another ‘spin-off’ from this filming was that I
decided to start making a series of short movies for
my own website to keep clients engaged. Small stories
from the battlefield that take about five minutes to
watch and have an informative and entertaining
character. My first short video is planned to be ready
early July, covering an ‘off the beaten track’ Market
Garden story. The film focuses on an action involving
the 15/19 Hussars near to where I live. I am certainly
not the first one to use video this way: several
initiatives exist on the internet nowadays: some of
these as a means to earn money – f.i., Bunker Boys –,
others to entertain people and/or raise your profile via
Zoom or YouTube – f.i., History Happy Hour or
Joris’ Battlefield Explorer videos on YouTube. I
believe online video is creative way of being out on
the battlefield and share knowledge with people who
cannot go on a tour at current, though I regard it as a
marketing tool and not as a viable business model on
its own. I am curious how this new activity of mine
will develop over time.
As June was progressing, it became clear that
restrictions would lift more and more nationally and
internationally come July. I felt I needed to prepare
and start thinking about how to set up some tours in
Summer to at least try and make good on some of the
revenue I lost earlier, and how to conduct tours in a
way that complied with COVID-19 health and safety
regulations. How to deal with the 1.5-meter
distancing rule? How to set up a viable tour when no
more than 15 people are allowed on a coach bus?
How to deal with limitations on number of people in
a museum or restaurant? What if different part in The
Netherlands interpret certain regulations differently
and stricter than others? It happened already. What
provisions am I required to make as a business? These
and many more questions needed to be addressed and
policies needed to be put in place for tours. I started
to contact local governments to check whether
touring with a group of people was allowed in their
area and if there were any specific restrictions in
place. Based on this information and after talking
with the director of the Wings of Liberation Museum,
a friend of mine, we decided to market a series hiking
and bike tours throughout this Summer. We approach
it as a test, as it already has become clear after several
weeks his museum and similar museums – a/o
Hartensteijn and Overloon –were reopened, that the
number of visitors is still dramatically low.
Consumers apparently are still wary to go out and
time will be needed to get back up to healthy levels of
numbers of visitors per day. I expect the same thing
will apply for these tours. But we will have to start
somewhere and get business going again.
Saturday 27 June: I went back on the battlefield, to
talk to clients about WW2 and show them where
these events happened. Leaving home early – I had a
two-hour drive down there – I met the group outside
the house they had rented in Schoppen in the
Ardennes. After meeting and introducing ourselves –
no hand shaking –, covering COVID-19 essentials –
check for symptoms, using hand gel, explaining
necessary general rules and guidelines, reiterating I
would drive in my car and they in theirs – and giving
them the tour handouts, I immediately jumped into
my role, saying: ‘Did you know this road in front of
your rental house was used by Kampfgruppe Peiper
to roll west, an hour or so before they committed the
now infamous Malmedy Massacre?’ I saw I
immediately had caught their full attention and they
were eager to hear what I would say next. It
promised this would be a highly informative tour day
in the Ardennes. Undoubtedly, there will be many
more hurdles to take, cancellations and
disappointments to deal with, and I am sure that the
road ahead back to ‘normal levels’ of business will
proof to be a long and difficult one. But all of that
could not take away my feeling when I stood in front
of the group that morning in Schoppen: I was back
where I belong: on the battlefield … guiding!
Sharing a personal story on the
landing beach at Waal Crossing site
Filming my Weatherby movie Me and Joris crossing the new bridge
at Nijmegen at Waal Crossing site
Making a bit of fun
of Joris' seriousness
Take I - lost count - went wrong also Problems on filming - people
cutting through your take
Editing a movie

DON’T MESS WITH TEXAS!
A TOUR OF THE TEXAN WAR
OF INDEPENDENCE 1835-1836
Jim Tanner
The Battle of the Alamo remains a legend to this day. Most people, certainly of a certain
age, have some knowledge of the defence of the Alamo by a ragged band of Americans
against a far greater-sized Mexican army if only through watching the 1960 Hollywood
movie with John Wayne to the fore; unmissable. All the many depictions on film perpetuate
the many myths but there is something about The Duke that is so honestly American, and
Texan. The old church at the Alamo – what served as something of a citadel during the
siege – survives to this day, if somewhat consumed by the modern city of San Antonio.
The myths abound but the undoubted bravery of the
defenders and the execution of some of the survivors
caused “Remember the Alamo” to become a battle-
cry for the ‘Texians’ in the revolution against the
Mexican government. The Mexican commander
might have written off the battle as ‘a small affair’
but its impact and the legend created were akin to
Thermopylae. The eventual victory of the Texians –
the name the American settles gave themselves – and
the creation of the Republic of Texas is worthy of
study. The battles were all on a relatively small scale
and there is not a great deal to glean on the matter of
tactics. But amid some staggering military ineptitude
on both sides, as a demonstration of superior morale
The church at the Mission San Antonio de Valero, the most recognisable structure of the Alamo. The whole site is currently undergoing
extensive transformation to aid better interpretation and restore dignity. See: www.culturalinnovations.com/the-alamo
and initiative as critical factors on
the battlefield, the war shines a
bright light.
There is no space here but for a
few details. H W Brands’ ‘Lone Star
Nation’ is particularly good on the
emergence of Texas from the time of
Mexico’s independence from Spain
in 1821, and before, to the
Republic’s admission to the United
States in 1845. The creation of the
state was wrapped up in the turmoil
that afflicted Mexico and
interwoven with stories of major
characters, some good and some
less, the fate of the American Indian
and the future greater struggle over
states’ independence.
The Alamo is the best-known of
all those sites that saw fighting
during the war but there is plenty
more to see to understand the war, if
not that many opportunities for erstwhile battlefield
guides to wave their arms about! The Lone Star State
is a vast place, more than two and a half times the
size of the UK, but a tour of the war can be achieved
comfortably in five days, including a slow first day in
Austin to take in the Texas State History Museum.
As elsewhere in the United States, history is handled
with often plentiful resources and great pride. A visit
too to the State Capitol helps put the still
independently minded Texans in perspective, if their
great friendliness to visitors can be a little distracted
by the common site of openly carried guns.
While not in chronological order it makes sense to
follow a logical route, given the distances to be
covered, and go from Austin to San Antonio (in 1836
San Antonio de Béxar) and the Alamo; stay the night.
While only a part of the original buildings has survived
it is still an impressive site and, despite the hordes of
visitors, the place retains quite an effect, especially
inside the church. The reverence displayed, here and
elsewhere, can seem too much to a Brit but, as one
historian has put it, “here brave men fought and died”.
The site is now being improved further as additional
space is clawed back from the adjacent urban sprawl.
The Spanish were first to turn the original mission
into a military post. The town was the largest in the
territory and the most strategic point, controlling one
of just two roads that ran from Mexico through to
Florida. The Texian garrison, commanded at short
notice by Colonel William Travis after the unreliable
Jim Bowie was struck down by illness, numbered
fewer than 300 and stood no chance of standing
against the Mexican Army of Operations, some
5,000 or so men commanded by General Antonio
Lopez de Santa Anna Pérez de Lebrón, the Mexican
dictator. The siege lasted from 23 February until 6
March, when Santa Anna launched an assault that
was unnecessary. Those of the garrison who had not
been killed, which included the legendary David
Crockett, were then executed.
The war had begun for the Texians the previous
year as almost a fallout from a simmering civil war in
Mexico. On 2 October at Gonzalez, 75 miles east of
San Antonio, about 100 Mexican ‘centralist’ cavalry
attempted to seize a small cannon from 18 American
colonists allied to the ‘federalist’ cause. They cried out
“Come and take it” and saw them off and the fuse of
the revolution was lit. The original cannon, little more
than a 4 pounder, can be seen in the Gonzales
Memorial Museum and the fight is significantly
memorialised outside the impressive building. It was
shortly after this that General Perfecto de Cós began,
under Santa Anna’s orders, to fortify the Alamo. He
had around 1400 men occupying the town but in an
unlikely turn of events, an armed mob – it was little
more than that – of somewhere between 300 and 500
Texians under Stephen Austin ground down the
Mexicans in a series of defeats. On 28 October
Bowie, with 90 men, defeated 400 Mexican troops at
Concepción, just south of San Antonio. The Texians
then lay siege to San Antonio and over the four days
of 5 to 9 December stormed the town and the Alamo
itself. This resounding Mexican defeat led directly to
Santa Anna’s campaign.
65 miles south of Gonzalez lies the town of Goliad
on the San Antonio River. Santa Anna’s plan had
been to lead his main force to San Antonio while
General José Urrea took 500 infantry and cavalry up

the second of the two roads, the hoped-for pincer
movement ensnaring the rebels. Urrea was a far
better leader than his chief and by early March had
swept aside a couple of Texian attempts to stop him.
It must be said that, while Santa Anna, who liked to
call himself the ‘Napoleon in the West’, was an
arrogant and negligent commander, Texian
leadership was lamentable. General Sam Houston,
more politician than soldier and supposedly in
overall command, proved largely weak and
indecisive. He reached Gonzales with a relief force
for the Alamo five days after the latter fell and then
decided to retreat, abandoning the Texians holding
out at Goliad. There, 350 men or more were
commanded by Colonel James Fannin who, in his
own words, had appealed to the newly-found Texan
government: “I feel, I know, if you and the Council
do not, that I am incompetent … if I am qualified to
command an Army, I have not found it out.” He had
appealed consistently to be relieved and
demonstrated his failings by setting off for the relief
A life-size diorama in the Texas History Museum in Austin
depicting the defiance of ‘The Old Eighteen’ and their cannon at
Gonzales, an act which lit the fuse of the Texas revolution.
The Gonzales cannon, the object of the call to “Come and take
it,” on its reproduction carriage in the Gonzales Museum.
of the Alamo far too late. He had held a relatively
strong position at Goliad. The Presidio La Bahia
there – Fort Defiance to the Texians – was a solid
fortress and visitors today are well rewarded by
having the opportunity to see the best preserved
presidio in the West.
The stone obelisk that marks the Battle of Coleto Creek on what
is now called the Fannin Battleground. The embedded gin screw,
referred to in the text, is nearby.
After so much vacillation on his part Fannin was
eventually ordered to fall back to the east. On 19-20
March he was caught in the open by Urrea at Coleto
Creek. Fannin and his men formed square and fought
for a while but after a long night the wounded Fannin
surrendered. They were marched back to the fort and
there, on 27 March, 342 of them – about 28 men
managed to escape – were murdered on Santa Anna’s
orders. The Coleto Creek battlefield, named the
Fannin Battleground State Historic Site, is much as it
was in 1836. It is somewhat neglected, which is a little
surprising but at the same time more atmospheric
than the over-memorialization on so many American
battlefields. There is a stone monument but in 1894 a
local farmer embedded an old gin screw in the ground
on the acknowledged site of Fannin’s square.
Gonzalez and Goliad occupy a full day but it is
worth then driving the 160 miles or so to Houston
for a further overnight stop. Houston puts you
within 20 miles of the San Jacinto battleground and
the finale of the war.
Sam Houston’s retreat – derisively called the
‘Runaway Scrape’ by his men – was pretty
purposeless. The disasters at the Alamo and Goliad
had fired up much-needed enthusiasm for the cause
but Houston frittered this away as confidence in him
drained. By the time of the final act he had about
The Presidio La Bahia at Goliad, abandoned by Colonel Fannin and to which he and his men were returned after their surrender, to be
murdered on its plaza on Santa Anna’s orders.
1,000 men and at least a good half had had the
opportunity to train in the rudiments of field
manoeuvre while Houston dithered at Groce. He was
determined to avoid any further confrontation and it
was only the democratic nature of his men that
forced him to follow, and to act. Santa Anna thought
he had the revolutionaries on the run, that the
campaign was all but over and, fatally, divided his
forces. Houston, who knew that Santa Anna was
aiming to reunite his forces and needed to take the
Harrisburg Road at Lynch’s Ferry on the San Jacinto
River, acted decisively for once.
On 20 April Houston won the race for the crossing
and when Santa Anna pitched up the following day it
was clear the Texians well-outnumbered the
Mexicans, about 900 to 700. But the moment was
lost despite, again, Houston’s subordinates ignoring
him and attacking anyway. By the next morning Santa
Anna had been reinforced by Cós to the tune of a
further 540 troops. Fortunately for Houston, Santa
Anna’s ineptitude proved the greater and his soldiers
the least motivated. The Texian attack late afternoon
of 21 April achieved complete surprise and was over
in 18 minutes. Nine Texians were killed and 30
wounded but 650 Mexicans died in the slaughter,
most of them given no quarter or murdered outright
having already surrendered. While Santa Anna, who

Further reading: Brands’ ‘Lone Star Nation’ is mentioned above
and is good for context, as is T R Fehrenbach’s ‘Lone Star’. For
wider context see Robert Goodwin’s ‘América – The Epic Story of
Spanish North America, 1493-1898’, which is an astonishing tale,
and S C Gwynne’s ‘Empire of the Summer Moon’, a gripping and
often uncomfortable book about the Comanche and ‘war to the
knife’ in Texas. For a purely military history there is Stephen
Hardin’s ‘Texas Iliad’. He writes particularly well and is also the
author of ‘Osprey’s The Alamo 1836 – Santa Anna’s Texas
Campaign’. The maps and diagrams in the latter serve well as a
battlefield guide. There are some very good websites, a good pick
being www.texasindependencetrail.com, www.thealamo.org and
www.sanjacinto-museum.org.
And don’t mess with Texas! The state began an effective
campaign 30 years ago to tidy up the place and stop littering.
One of its ads went like this:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=XlFD0Zyl_f0
The USS Texas.
Launched in 1912.
She saw action in both
World Wars, in the
latter supporting
landings in North
Africa and Normandy
and fighting in the
Pacific.
The San Jacinto battlefield viewed from the east at Marker 17,
showing the swampy terrain and the huge monument beyond. The
Texians attacked from the west and Marker 17 is situated where
the greatest slaughter of the surrendering Mexicans took place.
survived to bring further distress to his country, had
set the conditions for such acts, Sam Houston and his
Texians shed the honour they should have secured for
what was a complete victory. Texas had been won.
The San Jacinto battlefield requires some
imagination. The ground overall has altered
considerably in the intervening years through the
clearing of much of the swamp and the construction
of the Houston Ship Canal. A myriad of battlefield
markers provide plentiful guidance but the Texian
advances and much of the fighting are obscured by a
car park and a reflecting pool. The Mexican
positions are obliterated by a 600 foot stone
monument whose observation platform can be
reached by a lift, and there is another excellent
museum. And all visitors with a military interest will
be drawn to the floating immensity of the USS Texas,
sitting now on the very edge of the Texian camp. It is
the only surviving battleship to have fought in both
World Wars and the one surviving Dreadnought.
The Texas Independence Trail is fascinating. There is,
of course, much, much more to see in this huge state
and I would pick out Fort Davis, a beautifully preserved
fort of the era of the Indian Wars and the outstanding
Museum of the Pacific War in Fredericksburg, the home
town of Admiral Chester Nimitz. American battlefields
may have been ‘memorialised beyond recognition’ as
one (American) historian has put it, but that they are
preserved is a fine achievement in itself and that they do
so much to educate and inform is creditable. In Texas,
as elsewhere, the lives and deaths of many brave men
are remembered.
At 1545hrs (local time)1
on Saturday the 10th of
February 1945 Avro Lancaster PB 812, AR-Y of 460
Squadron RAAF, crashed just west of the railway
station at Caythorpe, in Lincolnshire. Caythorpe is 5
miles directly west of RAF Cranwell and the station
400 yds east of the village, in open farm-land. Five
RAAF and one RAF aircrew were killed. This article
examines the events leading to the loss of PB 812
from the perspective of historical research and
analysis. Flight Sergeant ‘Dick’ Miller and his crew
are silent witnesses. But I found sufficient evidence,
much of it contradictory, to arrive at an informed
conclusion as to the probable course of events.
I live in Caythorpe and a few years ago my
neighbour John, an ex-RAF ‘rigger’ from the 1960s,
asked me if I knew anything
about the Lancaster that crashed
by the railway station in 1945. I
didn’t and he proceeded to give
me my first two pieces of
evidence. He knew a neighbour,
now dead, who as a boy had
been cycling from the village
towards the railway station
when he heard a roar, looked up
and saw a Lancaster coming
vertically down at high speed.
An engine exploded and then the
aircraft hit the ground and he
was blown off his bike and over
a hedge by the force of the
second explosion. John then
showed me an intact engine valve and spring
assembly with the, bent, valve seat still attached. It
had been found, some years later, at a distance from
the crash site. A BBMF colleague of mine, who was a
very experienced RAF engine fitter, confirmed it
could only have been in this condition if the engine
had exploded prior to impact, most probably as a
result of the engine over-speeding to destruction.
I then searched the Aircrew Remembered database
of Bomber Command losses (now hosted and
maintained by the International Bomber Command
Centre) and soon found the details of the crash. A
check of the CWGC website showed them all to be
buried in the Bomber Command section of
Cambridge City Cemetery, in a collective grave.
1
British Summer Time, GMT +1 hr, was in force from 25 Feb 40 to 7 Oct 45. “Double” Summer Time had ended on 17 Aug 44. Guide to decoding Met Form 2003, Met Office, undated.
INVESTIGATING THE LOSS OF
LANCASTER PB 812
Christopher Finn, MPhil, FRAeS, FHEA, Accreditation Director
Assignment 6 requires the candidate to: Gather copies of a selection of sources for a battle
(or part thereof) to demonstrate your understanding of sources and their uses. However,
all too frequently we are presented with multiple examples of the same type of source (war
diaries in particular) and/or there is no explanation of the pros and cons of the selected
sources. I wrote this article recently for a historical society’s publication and thought it
would make a useful example of the value of different sources, and of comparison between
them. If you are considering doing Assignment 6, or just for a bit of fun, having read the
article go through it again noting down the different sources, what type you consider them
to be, what their uses are, and what their pros and cons are. At the back of this issue there
is a table of my analysis of them for you to compare your results with. The subsequent
assessment of the relative merits of the sources is in the article itself.

CWGC cemeteries are sources of
information for guides, but in this case there
is an anomaly – the headstones are not in the
usual, close, placement expected of a
collective grave.
I initially thought weather, particularly
icing, was a possible cause. Having used them
before, and found them incredibly helpful, I
emailed the Meteorological Office at Taunton
and asked for copies of the weather records
and synoptic charts for the UK for 9 to 11
February 1945. I had a zip file with
everything I had asked for, including the
detailed observations for Cranwell, within an
hour of asking.2
The 1500 hrs GMT (15 mins
after the crash) the records for RAF Cranwell
give us: 3/10 of large cumulus clouds, with no anvil,
between 2000 and 8000 ft; a single layer of alto-
cumulus covering half the sky between 8000 and
17000 ft; the surface visibility was 5 miles in haze.
As the Lancaster would have been flying at between
18000 and 20000 ft in clear air I discounted weather
as a possible cause.
A few weeks later an acquaintance who was a
Parish counsellor also asked me if I knew anything
about the crash. He was helping to organise a visit
from Linda Pope, the niece of the wireless operator,
who wanted to raise a memorial to the crew close to
the crash site. She was trying to find out more about
the crash and he gave me a couple of pieces of paper
and asked if they meant anything to me. They were
key extracts from the findings of the Court of
Enquiry into the crash and from the squadron’s
Operational Record Book (ORB)!
The ORB3
states that the weather that day was
“Rain and strong winds and there were no operations.
There was an aircraft crash. Flt Sgt Miller and 5 crew
were killed on a Cross Country Run.” The Court of
Enquiry record gives a short outline of the sortie. So
what happened to PB 81 ?
The aircraft took-off at 1124 hrs with the bomb-
Cambridge City Cemetery.
2
The synoptic charts and UK observation summaries are now available on the Met Office website for free download.
3
AIR 27/1910/3 – No 460 Sqn RAAF, RAF Binbrook, March 1944. 4
Written testimony to Court of Enquiry – HQ No 1 Gp, 27 February 1945
aimer (Arnold Kloeden) not aboard as he had been in
hospital for a few days previously. It was on the last
leg of the exercise, from Luton to Scunthorpe flying
at around 20,000 ft and 180 MPH indicated
airspeed. A medium sized town with steelworks,
Scunthorpe would have been the simulated target for
the navigator to home on to (and take a photograph
of his radar at his bomb release point) and he would
have to be there within 1 minute of his nominated
time-on-target. The aircraft crashed at Caythorpe at
1545 hrs, showing it had been on track and on time
up to that point. Apart from the boy on the bicycle,
there were two other eye-witnesses to the crash.
The first was George Plant. In 2016 he gave an
interview to Linda Pope, which was recorded. He
was a lucid and, to Linda, believable witness. He and
two friends were in the village High Street, waiting
for a bus to Grantham when “we saw this Lancaster
bomber, high up in the sky, and all of a sudden it
went into a dive but never got out of it. As it got
nearer the ground you could hear the engines going
full bore and then it crashed at the rear of the railway
station.” The cloud and visibility reported at
Cranwell just 15 minutes later are such that the
chances of him “seeing it go into a dive” (from 18 to
20,000 ft) are next to nothing. It also implies a
catastrophic failure of some kind. Fortunately, we
have another, far more plausible, eye-witness.
This is Warrant Office Stanley Moore, the pilot of an
Airspeed Oxford of No 1 Radio School who states4
:
“At 1545 hrs I took off from the NORTH
AERODROME CRANWELL, and climbed ahead
on a course of 265 deg T. When I was between
500’ and 600’ I was flying beneath a Cumulus
cloud the base of which I estimated to be 2000’ –
2500’. I saw a four engine bomber suddenly appear
ahead of me diving almost vertically in a direction
slightly away from me. This would be in a westerly
direction. The aircraft was on fire, flames and
smoke coming from the mid section of both port
and starboard wings. The flames appeared to be
confined to the wings and appeared to stretch to
halfway between the mainplane trailing edge and
the tailplane. I saw a flash as the aircraft hit the
ground near CAYTHORPE railway station. I
returned to base and reported the accident I had
just witnessed to Flying Control.”
As a Warrant Officer, Moore would have been an
experienced pilot, probably on a ‘rest’ tour after an
operational one. A trained observer, he was able in a
couple of seconds to see the aircraft, and assess its
relative range, aspect and velocity – an essential skill
if you are to survive in air combat. This is how PB
812 would have appeared to him:
The fuselage is slightly foreshortened, which is how
he was able to assess it being not quite in a vertical
dive, but with wings level and on a westerly heading.
Moore would have written his report before the end of
the day. So, the event would be clear in his mind and
the report contemporaneous. But he did make one
incorrect assumption, which we will come to later.
The final piece of evidence about the crash itself is
a letter from either the Officer Commanding No 460
Sqn, or Flt Sgt Dockery’s Flight Commander to his
father – the single page extract from the Australian
Archives does not show whom5
. In it the writer says
“As a result of the severe injuries sustained by the
crew it was found impossible to provide separate
coffins. This being the case a communal coffin was
prepared for all six members for burial at the RAF
Regional Cemetery, Cambridge.” To have so few
remains from six aircrew, and none identifiable,
testifies to the high speed and dive angle of PB 812 in
its final few seconds.
Flt Sgt Miller and his crew were not yet ‘operational’
so they didn’t have their ‘own’ aircraft. PB 812 was
usually flown by Fg Off Luhrs who gave this evidence
to the Court of Enquiry:
“I was usually captain and pilot of LANCASTER
PB 812. After operations on January 2nd
1945 I complained that the automatic pilot
fitted to this aircraft caused the aircraft to go
into a sudden dive. This was attended to and
since then there has been no further sign of
this trouble (on four subsequent operations).”
WO Moore was the 16th witness and Fg Off
Luhrs the 32nd. The other evidence submitted
to the Court would have concerned the
maintenance history of PB 812, evidence of
identity of the crew, evidence from the crash
site and of the weather at the time.
The Court of Enquiry concluded6
:
“As the aircraft was so extensively damaged,
the court have not found it possible to come
to any definite conclusions to the cause of
the crash.”
It also gave its opinion that the violent
automatic pilot disengagement may have recurred
and, given that the pilot was “known to have been
inexperienced in the practical operation of the
automatic pilot” this may have been the initial cause
of the accident.
The Air Officer Commanding No 1 Group agreed
with the primary conclusion of the Court. However,
he then made the following additional remarks:
“I consider there is insufficient evidence to assign
the cause of the dive to an unserviceable
automatic pilot. The pilot should have been able
to disengage the automatic pilot, should a defect
have occurred as previous pilots had done so.
I consider the vertical dive on fire is consistent
with the aircraft having been in an inverted
attitude, possibly due to entering a cumulus type
cloud, sufficiently long for the petrol system to
have been disturbed, resulting in fire.”
Air Vice Marshal ‘Bob’ Blucke7
was a very
experienced pilot. He had commanded the Blind
Approach Training and Development Unit at the
start of the war. Then, as a Group Captain, RAF
Ludford Magna where he had been awarded a DSO
for his piloting of a stricken Lancaster during a raid
on Mannheim. He then, as an Air Commodore,
commanded No 14 Base (a group of 1 Gp airfields
with their HQ at Ludford Magna) before taking
command of No 1 Gp on the 5th of February 1945.
His comments on the ‘disturbed petrol system’ are
crucial to our understanding of the possible final
flightpath of PB 812. The diagram above right shows
the No 2 fuel tank, one in each wing between the two
engines. To enable air to replace fuel as it is used a vent
with a pipe is fitted to the top of each fuel tank. The
long pipe is to prevent fuel from leaking from the tank if
the aircraft is at high angles of bank or dive. But if the
aircraft is inverted, with air passing at high speed over
the outlet of the vent pipe, it becomes a syphon and fuel
This photo, from an un-named Cambridge paper shows Nesbit-Bell’s
parents and wife (all from Bristol) and Graeme Dockery’s parents
(travelling through England enroute to south Africa) and
the single coffin.
5
460S/S.461/206/P1 dated 22 February 1945. 6
Extract from the Court of Enquiry into accident to Lancaster PB 812, HQ No 1 Gp, 27 February 1945.
7
As Sqn Ldr Blucke he had piloted the Heyford Bomber which participated

is now sucked out of the tank. What AVM Blucke, with
his extensive Lancaster experience, immediately saw was
that the flames coming from the rear of the centre
section of the wing were not, as WO Moore had
assumed, from a burning aircraft. They were the fuel
coming from the centre tank vents vaporising and being
ignited by hot engine exhaust gases.
Having already eliminated weather as a cause we
can also eliminate catastrophic structural or engine
failure – WO Moore would have recognised that
immediately and, in the case of structural failure, the
aircraft would have been tumbling, out of control.
AVM Blucke does, however, give some credence to an
automatic pilot malfunction being a step in the chain
of events that led to the fatal crash. In a further remark
he says “I recommend that the training in automatic
pilots at Heavy Conversion Units should be encouraged
to the maximum degree.” So the most likely sequence
of events is that the pilot, and the flight engineer, were
distracted by an automatic pilot malfunction to the
point that the pilot allowed the aircraft to become
inverted in cloud, culminating in a vertical dive.
To end up on a westerly heading, from a northerly
one, and be fully inverted for some time the aircraft
would have had to roll over to the right with the nose
pitching down. In other words, an inadvertent ‘barrel
roll’, a manoeuvre in which by pitching down whilst
inverted the crew are under positive ‘g’ and don’t
sense that they are inverted. Had he detected this
earlier the pilot would have rolled the right way up
and escaped on an easterly heading. The navigator
would not have seen this as he would have been
behind his curtain, screening out the light, whilst he
concentrated on his final radar fix. The wireless
operator was equally unsighted. Why either of the
two gunners did not raise the alarm is unknown. The
aircraft was only just above the half-cover of cloud,
up possibly to 17,000 ft, so it could have slipped very
quickly into cloud denying them a visual horizon
to refer to. However, had the bomb aimer been in
his position looking forward through the
plexiglass nose he might have seen the initial roll
developing and raised the alarm – just the word
SKIPPER ! over the intercom would have
snapped the pilot out of his focus on the
automatic pilot problem and returned him to
flying the aeroplane.
By the time he did realise the problem it was
far too late. Designed, amongst other things, as a
dive bomber the Manchester, and hence the
Lancaster had a maximum permitted indicated air
speed of 360 MPH, twice its operational cruise
speed. The Pilots’ Notes say “the aircraft becomes
increasingly nose-heavy in a high-speed dive, nose
up trim should be used and the flight engineer
should be ready to assist the pilot as required.”
There are a number of instances of a Lancaster
exceeding 400 MPH in a dive and pulling out from it,
with the flight engineer standing behind the pilot’s
seat and pulling on the control column as well. An
early flight test report showed that to recover from
just a 30 degree dive at 350 MPH required 150 lbs of
stick force which had to be “held for many seconds to
regain normal flying speed and altitude.”
We know the aircraft was well over the maximum
cleared speed because one engine over-sped to
destruction in the last couple of seconds of the flight.
At 400 MPH it would have been travelling at about
600 ft/second, or 36,000 ft/min. From 18,000 ft the
whole episode would not have lasted much more than
a minute. When PB 812 came out of cloud over
Caythorpe at 1545 hrs on Saturday 10 March 1945 it
was under control. Its wings were level and it was
starting to recover from the dive. But Flt Sgt Miller
and his crew had simply run out of altitude, and luck.
Analysis
See pages 26-27 for source material
The memorial to Linda Pope’s uncle and his crew-mates was
dedicated on the afternoon of Saturday 10 September 2016.
Diagram of No 2 fuel tank.
LOCAL LOCKDOWN LOOKS
AT SOME MONUMENTS
CLOSE TO HOME AND DOVER
(if you get delayed there when we are able to visit the Continent once more)
Tonie and Valmai Holt
CLOSE TO HOME
1. WW2 Border Marker Stone, now situated at
the top of a bank in our garden, is one of many
that marked the border between Holland and
Germany in September 1944. It was originally
at the edge of the Reichswald Forest and by the
US Landing Zone LZN. It was presented to us
by our old friend, Frans Ammerlaan of
Oosterbeek. Frans is one of the most
knowledgeable experts on the Market-Garden
campaign and has done years of dedicated
support for returning veterans, notably with the
London Taxis who regularly transport veterans
to Market-Garden and Normandy see
www.taxicharity.org/post/taxi-charity-to-
escort-veterans-to-the-netherlands-for-airborne-
wandeltocht-2019.
He has also done amazing work to get the
Polish veterans recognised. See also
marketgarden.com/2010/UK/foundation.html
2. Here we are
with Frans at the
informal unveiling
in front of a
handful of local
battlefield
enthusiasts on 27
February 2016.
3. Close to home is the Sandwich War
Memorial, first inaugurated in 1922. The
interesting brick screen wall protects a fine
bronze statue of St George killing the dragon
sculpted by Charles Leonard Hartwell. To either
side are bronze panels, on which are inscribed
the names of 87 WW1 casualties, including
several pairs of brothers and cousins and the 21
WW2 1939-45 names. Smaller panels list the
three 1951 Korean casualties and the one
Falklands names from 1982.

4. Around the corner is a Memorial Plaque under a
fine old brick frame, to Lt Col Augustus Charles
Newman, VC, OBE, TD, Dl, Croix de Guerre,
Légion d’Honneur, attd No 3 Commando, who on
28 March 1942, led the Military Forces attack
(known as ‘Operation Chariot’) on the Dry Dock at
St Nazaire. After fierce fighting, in which he had
inspired his men, and out of ammunition, he and
what was left of his men, were captured and taken
prisoner. His VC was one of five awarded that day.
The Plaque was unveiled on 26 April 2018 at a well-
attended ceremony of local dignitaries.
5. Still in Sandwich is USN P22 American
Patrol Boat, which has been moored, near
the historic Toll Bridge, in the River Stour
since 2017. It is the only existing one of 23
built by a German ship builder to patrol the
River Rhine in the Cold War. P22 featured
in the 1917 film of ‘Dunkirk’. Incidentally,
beside the Toll House is the historic St
Crispin Inn where, it is said, the SBS (then
the Special Boat Section) was planned in
July 1940. In December 1942 (then known
as the Special Boat Service) it earned fame
as two of its boats, known as ‘The
Cockleshell Heroes’, raided cargo ships in
Bordeaux.
6. Nearby Knowlton is one of the
country’s ‘Thankful Villages’ who didn’t
lose one single parishioner during WW1,
thirty two of which were identified by
Arthur Mee in the 1930s in his ‘The King’s
England’. More recent research by
members of Hellfire Corner
(www.hellfirecorner.co.uk/thankful) have
discovered some fifty four. From this tiny
village – rather a hamlet – with its
population of thirty nine, twelve men went
to war and twelve returned. The 17ft high
memorial was unveiled on 8 September
1919. Knowlton itself merits a visit with
its Lutyens-designed Lodge House and
tiny Church of St Clements.
DOVER
7. Memorial to the Merchant Navy. This fine figure was sculpted
by Vivien Mallock, who also sculpted the moving soldier outside
the D-Day Memorial, Portsmouth, the fine sculpture of Gen
Montgomery at Colleville-Montgomery, the busts of John
Howard at Pegasus Bridge and Gen Sir Richard Gale at Ranville.
The memorial brims with information - on all four sides - about
the 45,329 Merchant Navy casualties, the Battle of the Atlantic
and Operation Neptune, supporting the Normandy invasion,
which all deserve reading. It was founded by Donald Hunter,
Légion d’Honneur and funded by local donations.
8. Royal Norwegian Navy Memorial, erected 23 May 1998.
Norwegian ships operated from Dover, supporting the Royal Navy
throughout WW2, with the loss of 320 lives. The Norwegian
Merchant Navy lost 400 ships and 2,200 lives. There is another
Norwegian Navy memorial at Villon-les-Buissons in Normandy,
where their destroyer Svenner was lost.
9. Memorial to ‘Operation Fuller’, directed
by Vice-Admiral Ramsay from the War
Rooms in the White Cliffs to stem the German
naval activities of 1941, when the German
Battle Cruiser Scharnhorst sank over 115,000
tons of British Merchant Shipping. At one
stage during the widespread Operation, the
battle in the Channel involved the Coastal
Artillery at North Foreland. The long pursuit
also involved sea mines and the Submarine
Service, and continued into 1942 until, finally,
the Scharnhorst and her sister ship, Gneisenau
were badly damaged and driven into Kiel
Harbour on 13 February.
If your car or coach is delayed by cyclonic winds or strikes in Calais etc there is a range of WW1 and
WW2 memorials along the attractive seafront, from the ferry port towards the Hythe Bay
Restaurant at the end are:

10. Front Line Britain 1939-1945 Plaque. This very
early plaque, erected on 29 September 1945, only a
month after WW2 was officially closed on VJ Day, 15
August 1945, commemorates all men and women,
service and civilian who ‘lived and served in East Kent’.
It was unveiled by Countess Mountbatten of Burma.
11. Royal British Legion ‘Soldier in a Box’
Centenary Memorial. Many poppies are
scattered round the base of the statue hence,
perhaps, the rather unusual transparent box.
It was designed by Mark Humphrey and
thanks all those, of all nations, who ‘served
and sacrificed’ during WW1. See
www.rbl.org.uk/thankyou.
12. This Dover Bombardment Memorial
was presented to Dover by the town of Calais
in 1951. It is a section of armoured plating
from a German long-range gun and lists the
84 recorded rounds of 2,226 shells directed at
Dover Harbour and the Town, 1940-1944.
13. Dunkirk Memorial. This fine bas relief
memorial shows a soldier being dragged onto one
of the armada of ‘Little Ships’ which rescued men
from the Dunkirk Beaches in 1940. It was erected
by the Dunkirk Veterans Association on the 35th
Anniversary and also thanks the people of Dover
who received them.
PICTURES THAT PAINT A
THOUSAND WORDS
Ian R Gumm
‘The Night Before Battle’, ‘An Avalanche of Irishmen’, and ‘Private Thomas Hughes
receiving the VC in Hyde Park’. In this article I recount the actions of the 20th (Light)
Division and the 16th (Irish) Division at Guillemont on the Somme on 3 September 1916.
I have based it on three pictures that I use to enhance the story and have presented it in the
form of stands for a battlefield tour. As this is an article specifically produced for the GBG
I have included some IWM photographs under their accepted use policy – ‘Non-Commercial
educational use for the purpose of teaching and instruction, including internal training’.
Guillemont Road Cemetery
GPS: 50.010965, 2.816413
Standing at the eastern boundary wall overlooking
the ground towards Guillemont.
The first picture is ‘The Night Before Battle’, a
depiction of the Catholic Chaplain surrounded by
Irishmen on the night of 2-3 September 1916 published
in Ireland by the Weekly Freeman, National Press &
Irish Agriculturist Christmas 1916. For the 16th (Irish)
Division, the Battle of Guillemont was to be their first
major action of the First World War. Their 47th
Infantry Brigade had been attached to the 20th (Light)
Division and they were to assault the northern end of
the village that was held by the Infanterie-Regiment 76
of the German 111th Infantry Division.
Guillemont sits in a slight depression on the
forward edge of a ridge of higher ground that is
orientated in a north-west to south-east direction on
the far side of the village. This ridge is an extension of

the Thiepval Ridge to the north-west and extends
from Longueval and Delville Wood in the west to
Leuze Wood in the east near Combles. The
neighbouring village of Ginchy sits on the highest
point in the area to the north of Guillemont. West of
the village the ground falls away in a shallow valley
that runs south of Longueval through Trones Wood
and the northern tip of Bernafay Wood before entering
Guillemont from the west. It is the head of this
shallow valley that forms the depression in which the
village sits. To the south and south-east of Guillemont
from about 500 to 1000-yards out the ground falls
away more sharply in an irregular landscape of spurs
and re-entrants towards the River Somme.
The nearest two of these re-entrants are the most
important in respect of the battle. The first is
immediately south of Guillemont and rises from the
area of Wedge Wood towards the high ground west
of Leuze Wood. The second is further south and east
and rises from the area to the north of Maurepas up
towards Combles and the high ground beyond.
To the north-west of Guillemont is the infamous
Delville Wood which sits to the north of the
Longueval – Ginchy Road, and to the west are the
two large woods, Trones Wood and Bernafay Wood.
To the east are Leuze Wood and Bouleaux Wood.
Approximately 400-yards south-west of Guillemont
was a small triangular plantation that was known as
Arrowhead Copse and about 1000-yards to the
south-east of the village is Wedge Wood.
Running through the centre of Guillemont and out
to the east is Mount Street and leading out to the west
is the Montauban – Guillemont Road. To the rear of
the village running in a north to south direction is the
Ginchy – Wedge Wood Road and leading north-west
out of the village is the Longueval – Guillemont Road.
From the south-western corner of the village there
were two sunken lanes that ran south from the
Montauban – Guillemont Road. About 500-yards
south-east of Wedge Wood, sitting on the forward
slope of the spur between the two re-entrants, was
Falfemont Farm. To the north-west of Guillemont
close to the Longueval – Guillemont Road was the
Station and further north-west is Waterlot Farm. To
the south of the Station and the west of the village was
an area known as The Quarries and to the south of
The Quarries, adjacent the Montauban – Guillemont
Road, was an area known as The Fortress.
The first attempt to take Guillemont was on 8
August 1916. The 2nd and 55th Divisions attacked
but Generalleutnant von Moser’s 27th
(Württemberg) Infantry Division held them off. The
3rd and 24th Divisions then tried to seize the village
on 18 August, but they too were unsuccessful.
Guillemont was proving to be a hard nut to crack.
On 21 August 1916 the 5th Division and 20th
(Light) Division were the next to try to capture
Guillemont. The 7th Division was to capture the
village of Ginchy to the north and was to attack at
the same time. The 27th (Württemberg) Infantry
Division had, in the meantime, been replaced by the
111th Infantry Division and their Infanterie-
Regiment 76 (IR 76) occupied the northern half of
the ruined village and the Hanoverian Fusilier
Regiment 73 (FR 73) occupied the southern end and
the area immediately to the south. Whilst some gains
were made to the north towards Ginchy the two
villages remained firmly in German hands.
On 23 August 1916 the Germans counterattacked
against the 20th (Light) Division and pushed them
back. A planned attack was planned towards the end
of August, but bad weather caused this to be
postponed. As August turned into September the
weather changed and conditions looked more
favourable. The planned fourth attempt was now
rescheduled for 3 September 1916. By now, however,
the 20th (Light) Division was so worn out by the
constant attrition that there was doubt as to whether
they were fit enough to mount the assault. In
preparation, therefore, Brigadier-General Cameron
Shute’s 59th Brigade was withdrawn from the line on
30 August to get some rest and Brigadier-General
George Pereira’s 47th Brigade, from the 16th (Irish)
Division, was given orders to report to Major-
General Douglas-Smith’s headquarters and would be
attached to the 20th (Light) Division for the assault.
On Saturday, 2 September 1916 the preliminary
bombardment in preparation for the planned deliberate
assault at Guillemont began. During that day, the 59th
Brigade moved back into the frontline opposite
Guillemont, received their orders for the attack to be
launched the following day and the Battalions moved
into their allotted assembly positions.
In his book ‘The Irish at the Front’ Michael
MacDonagh wrote about the night before the battle:
“September 3 was a Sunday. On the night before
the battle the Irish troops selected for the attack on
Guillemont bivouacked on the bare side of a hill.
They were the Connaughts, the Royal Irish, the
Munsters and the Leinsters. The rain had ceased,
but the ground was everywhere deep in mud, the
trenches were generally flooded and the shell holes
full of water. It was a bleak and desolate scene,
relieved only here and there by the sparkle of the
little fires around which the platoons clustered. Just
as the men of one of the battalions were preparing
to wrap themselves in their greatcoats and lie down
for the rest which they might be able to snatch in
such a situation, the Catholic Chaplain came over
the side of the hill and right to the centre of the
camp. “In a moment he was surrounded by the
men,” writes Major Redmond. “They came to him
without orders they came gladly and willingly, and
they hailed his visit with plain delight. He spoke to
them in the simple, homely language which they
liked. He spoke of the sacrifice which they had
made in freely and promptly leaving their homes to
fight for a cause which was the cause of religion,
freedom and civilisation. He reminded them that in
this struggle they were most certainly defending the
homes and the relations and friends they had left
behind them in Ireland.
It was a simple, yet most moving address, and
deeply affected the soldiers. Major Redmond goes
on to say: “When the Chaplain had finished his
address, he signed to the men to kneel, and
administered to them the General Absolution given
in times of emergency. The vast majority of the men
present knelt, and those of other faith stood by in
attitudes of reverent respect. The Chaplain then
asked the men to recite with him the Rosary. It was
most wonderful the effect produced as hundreds
and hundreds of voices repeated the prayers and
recited the words, ‘ Pray for us now and at the
hour of our death. Amen.’ At the dawn Masses
were said by the Chaplains of all the battalions in
the open, and most of the officers and men received
Holy Communion.”
Overlooking The Quarries
GPS: 50.013246, 2.820272
Standing to the north of the track junction to the
west of Guillemont, looking towards the village.
The second picture that paints a thousand word is ‘An
Avalanche of Irishmen’, a depiction of the 6th
Connaught Rangers charging The Quarries on 3
September 1916 published in The Illustrated London
News on 7 October 1916.
Directly in front of you is the area that was known as
The Quarries. To your south, where the track joins the
Guillemont Road, is the area that was known as The
Fortress and to your north, on the far side of the track
joining from the Longueval Road, was the Station.
The morning of Sunday, 3 September 1916 was
fine with the ground drying up considerably. At
06:00 hrs the artillery fire-plan for the attack
commenced with a deliberate bombardment of key
areas. At 08:15 hrs a ‘Chinese attack’ took place
where all batteries fired with a burst of rapid fire
simultaneously on the German lines.
At 08:30 hrs intense concentrated fire was directed
against an area known as the ‘TRAP’ to the north-
east of Guillemont. Throughout the morning the
artillery fired similar fire missions.
As the artillery bombardment fell on Guillemont
the riflemen of the 59th Brigade and Irishmen of the
47th Brigade waited in their jumping off positions to
the west of the village. The 10th Battalion King’s
An Avalanche of Irishmen overwhelming a German trench at Guillemont.

Royal Rifle Corps was just a little closer than the
position of Guillemont Road CWGC Cemetery today
and they crouched low, keeping their heads down in
their trenches as they waited for zero hour. About
half-an-hour before the attack the Germans shelled
the area to the left of the Montauban – Guillemont
Road with Minenwerfer mortars.
The artillery fire-plan for the assault was to put
down stationary fire on each objective and provide a
creeping barrage that moved in front of the infantry
at a pace of fifty yards per minute. The stationary
barrage would lift to the next objective at set times or
when the creeping barrage came up to it. At 12:00
noon a short hurricane bombardment took place
with half of the guns firing the stationary barrage on
the German main defensive line and the other half
beginning the creeping barrage.
As this intense artillery fire came in, the British
infantrymen of the two assaulting Divisions of XIV
Corps rose from their assembly trenches and began
to move forward.
In the 47th Brigade’s area, the 6th Battalion the
Connaught Rangers had one of their companies
crawl forward prior to zero hour. At the appointed
time the battalion rose from their assembly trenches
as the guns lifted. They charged the enemy in the
vicinity of The Quarries and the western edge of the
village. Entering the enemy positions, they were
quick to push forward. At one point the Connaught
Rangers reached the German main defensive line as
the enemy was manning the parapet and mounting a
machine gun. Hit by this avalanche of Irishmen and
taken completely by surprise the enemy surrendered.
To their left the 7th Battalion, the Leinster
Regiment rose from their assembly trenches and
advanced towards The Station keeping tight behind
the creeping barrage. Lieutenant John Vincent
Holland of the Leinsters left The Gridiron and moved
south-east toward the enemy positions in Guillemont
with his group of twenty-six bombers. He led his
group forward and they entered the German main
defensive line. Here they set about clearing the enemy
and seizing the German line before pressing on into
the village. Once in the ruins of Guillemont
Lieutenant Holland’s group of bombers drove
forward clearing the enemy from their dugouts as
they went. In doing so they sustained heavy casualties
and by the time that they reached the far side of the
village they were reduced to just five unwounded. In
their vigorous and ferocious assault Lieutenant
Holland’s group of bombers captured 50 enemy
soldiers. Lieutenant Holland’s group of bombers
The attack by the 20th (Light) Division, with 47th Brigade under command, to capture the village of Guillemont on 3 September
1916. © Ian R Gumm, 2020
were:
4962 Sergeant. Michael Kelly, DCM.
5331 Corporal Patrick Colgan, MM.
10533 Lance-Corporal Edward Dowling, MM.
3398 Lance-Corporal Germiah Gueran, KIA.
8533 Lance-Corporal Arthur Lee, DCM (wounded).
4828 Lance-Corporal Daniel Synnott, MM (wounded).
2894 Private Joseph Armstrong (wounded).
5080 Pte Patrick Boylan (wounded).
2863 Private Patrick Clarke (wounded).
2129 Private Michael Clarkin, MM (wounded).
3321 Private Timothy Coughlan, MM.
4417 Pte John Dolan (wounded).
3285 Private Joseph Elliott, KIA.
2854 Pte John Ford (recommended for commission).
3490 Private Michael Hogan, KIA.
5153 Private Richard Holohan (wounded).
3330 Pte Henry McCabe (wounded).
2914 Private Ernest McClelland (wounded).
2178 Private John McComisky, KIA.
10334 Pte Michael McEvoy (wounded).
3505 Pte Henry McGuire (wounded).
3311 Private Bernard Moore, MM (wounded).
2954 Private William Morgan, KIA.
3234 Pte William Morton (wounded).
5179 Private Patrick Murphy (wounded).
10483 Private John O’Brien (wounded).
For his actions on 3 September 1916 Lieutenant John
Holland was awarded the Victoria Cross. His
citation in the London Gazette reads:
“For most conspicuous bravery during a heavy
engagement, when, not content with bombing hostile
dug-outs within the
objective, he fearlessly led
his bombers through our
own artillery barrage-
and cleared a great part
of the village in front. He
started out with 26
bombers and finished up
with only five after
capturing, some fifty
prisoners. By this very
gallant action he
undoubtedly broke the
spirit of, the enemy, and
thus saved us many
casualties when the
battalion made a further
advance. He was far from
well at the time, and later
had to go to hospital.”
The 6th Connaught
Rangers did not properly
clear The Quarries in their
eagerness to enter the One of my Irish Groups at Guillemont. © Ian R Gumm, 2017
village and left behind small pockets of the enemy that
threatened the left-flank of the 59th Brigade’s 10th
Battalion, the King’s Royal Rifle Corps. Lieutenant
Colonel Cyril A Blacklock, commanding the 10th King’s
Royal Rifle Corps, saw the danger and immediately sent
in his reserve company and a platoon from one of his
other companies to clear The Quarries position. His
swift action avoided what could otherwise have been a
serious threat to the success of the operation. Lieutenant
Colonel Blacklock was awarded a bar to his DSO for his
actions on 3 September 1916. His citation in the
London Gazette reads:
“For conspicuous gallantry in action. When in
command of the left attack of the brigade,
considerable bodies of the enemy emerged from
underground defences in rear of the brigade. He at
once detached parties to deal with the situation,
thereby enabling: the attack to be successfully
carried out. Later he captured and consolidated five
consecutive objectives, displaying the greatest
courage and initiative.”
The Company that Lieutenant Colonel Blacklock sent
to clear The Quarries was A Company and the platoon
came from D Company. A Forward Observation
Officer (FOO) from CVIII Battery RFA, neglecting his
own duties, had gone forward with the D Company
Platoon and taken part in the attack. Their platoon
commander was by this time a casualty and the FOO
led them into The Quarries. Unfortunately, I cannot
find a record of his name but under his leadership the
Platoon from D Company 10th King’s Royal Rifle
Corps set about mopping up the remaining Germans.

mad dash the remainder
of the way capturing an
enemy machine gun post
and taking more than 100
prisoners. To their right
the 59th Brigade made
short work of getting to
the Ginchy – Wedge
Wood Road without
taking heavy casualties
and clearing out
numerous small parties of
the enemy from their
dugouts as they went.
Before moving to the
20th (light) Division
Memorial visit the
church to look at the
memorials inside.
Guillemont after the attack in September 1916. (IWM Q 53153)
Mounted British ammunition carriers passing through Guillemont, 12 October 1916. (IWM Q 60620)
20th (Light) Division
GPS: 50.014344, 2.834419
Standing at the 20th (Light) Division Memorial to
the east of Guillemont.
The 10th Rifle Brigade, 11th Rifle Brigade and one
company of the 10th King’s Royal Rifle Corps
carried out the attack on the second objective in the
59th Brigade’s area. On their left the 8th Royal
Munsters took over the assault in the 47th Brigade’s
area. The advance was timed to start at 12:50 hrs
and soon, thereafter, reports were coming in that they
had reached their assigned positions. So close did the
troops keep up to the barrage that the next objective,
Private Thomas Hughes receiving the VC in Hyde Park from King George V on 2 June 1917.
16th (Irish) Division Memorial
GPS: 50.012853, 2.824386
Standing at the 16th (Irish) Division Memorial
outside Guillemont Church.
The third picture that paints a thousand words is
‘Private Thomas Hughes receiving the VC in Hyde
Park’ from the Great War published in 1918.
Another to distinguish himself during the capture
of Guillemont on 3 September 1916 was Private
Thomas Hughes of the 6th Connaught Rangers. His
actions led to him also being awarded the Victoria
Cross. His London Gazette citation reads:
“For most conspicuous bravery and
determination. He was wounded in an attack but
returned at once to the firing line after having his
wounds dressed.
Later, seeing a hostile machine-gun, he dashed
out in front of his company, shot the gunner, and
single-handed captured the gun.
Though again wounded, he brought back three
or four prisoners.”
Both brigades under the command of the 20th (Light)
Division secured their initial objectives by 12:30 hrs.
They had experienced some very fierce fighting in the
vicinity of the sunken lanes, The Quarries and The
Station. On the right the 6th Battalion, the Oxford
and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry and the 10th
King’s Royal Rifle Corps held the line of the second
sunken lane and western edge of the village as far as
Mount Street. The 10th and 11th Battalions, the Rifle
Brigade were in the first of the sunken lanes to their
rear. On the left of the 20th (Light) Division’s area the
6th Connaught Rangers and 7th Leinsters held the rest
of the western and northern edges of the village. They
had the 8th Battalion, the Royal Munster Fusiliers in
reserve and the 6th Battalion, the Royal Irish Rifles
were moving forward from Trones Wood.
At 14:00 hrs the advance to the third objective
began as the assaulting battalions pushed forward
towards the Ginchy – Wedge Wood Road. The third
objective was more easily gained, though the
assaulting companies, who had now been reinforced
by those in support, came under heavy machine gun
fire from the right flank. In the 47th Brigade’s area
the 6th Royal Irish Rifles had passed through the 6th
Connaught Rangers and 7th Leinsters to join the 8th
Royal Munsters in the forefront of the attack.
Together they pushed to within 70-yards of the road
under heavy fire. Gathering themselves they made a

the eastern edge of the village, was reached before the
allotted time. There was a great deal of hand-to-hand
fighting in the village and in the orchards on the south
side, but by 13:30 hrs the 20th (Light) Division’s
second objective had been taken. There was still a
great deal of fighting going on in the village as the
supporting troops moved through it consolidating the
gains made and mopping up the small pockets of
enemy left behind by the assaulting troops.
One officer of the 10th King’s Royal Rifle Corps
that deserves a mention is Second Lieutenant David
Guy Davies. For his actions during the attack at
Guillemont he was awarded the Military Cross. His
citation from the London Gazette reads:
“For conspicuous gallantry in action. On three
occasions he went forward into our own barrage
and brought back some of his men who had pushed
too far forward. Later, he re-organised his company
to complete their task.”
By the 17 September 1916 Second Lieutenant Davies
had been promoted to temporary Captain
commanding A Company 10th King’s Royal Rifle
Corps and this promotion was confirmed on 22
September. On 4 April 1917 Captain David Guy
Davies MC was Killed-in-Action at Metz-en-Couture
and is buried in Gouzeaucourt New British Cemetery,
grave VII F 3.
To the north of the 47th Brigade, Brigadier-
General Steele’s 22nd Brigade from the 7th Division
assaulted with two battalions from their assembly
trenches in front of Delville Wood. The 1st Battalion
the Royal Welsh Fusiliers were on the left and the
20th Battalion the Manchester Regiment were on the
right; together they advanced towards Ginchy and
the trenches to the north and east of the wood. Both
battalions pushed into the village swiftly overcoming
any resistance in their path, though the company of
the 1st Royal Welsh Fusiliers on the left of the assault
came under withering enfilade fire from the ‘Brewery
Trenches’. The right-hand company of the 1st Royal
Welsh Fusiliers entered the village and were halted by
enfilade fire just short of the orchards where they
began to dig-in.
As the 20th Manchesters crossed the main north-
south road, they too came under withering machine
gun fire and were brought to a standstill. By 15:50
hrs they had reached their objective in the south-
eastern end of the village, but by now most of their
officers were either killed or wounded. They too
began to dig-in to consolidate their gains.
By mid-afternoon, Guillemont had been captured
up to the line of the Ginchy – Wedge Wood Road
several hundred yards to the east of the village. To
the north the 7th Division were in Ginchy, though
their hold on the village was tenuous. At 18:00 hrs
the Germans mounted a counterattack and pushed
the 7th Division back out of the village to re-
established control of Ginchy and by the end of 3
September Guillemont was in British hands while
Ginchy was once again held by the Germans.
The Battle of
Guillemont. 3 -5
September 1916.
Dead German
soldiers scattered
in the wreck of a
machine gun post
near Guillemont.
(IWM Q 4256)
Richard held that simply standing in a cemetery narrating the lives of the men interred there simply bent history out
of shape as it ignored the men who had survived and anyhow, except on rare occasions, the cemetery itself did little
to enable a better understanding of the events which had led to its sad occupancy. As we all recognise, Richard
Holmes was a battlefield historian sans-pareil but he always described himself as ‘a military historian who likes to
tell stories’. A simple philosophy but the problem is where to find the stories. It is all very well trawling through
official histories and narrating the bare facts but the devil is really in the detail - the personal detail, the detail known to
the men on the ground. As a guide one obviously has to have a grasp of the historical facts but having spent time
watching other guides and visiting parties it is clear that people relish anything which brings humanity to the forefront
of any location. Inevitably cemeteries are about numbers and, as Stalin said, one death is a tragedy but a million dead
are only a statistic, and the project required the photographs to reflect the experience of the men involved.
PHOTOJOURNALIST GUIDE
PART ONE
Mike Sheil
Photo 1 The sunken road at Gommecourt which Liveing managed to cross despite the enfilading machine-gun fire from Rossignol
Wood on the horizon.
When I first started working on my photographic project ‘Fields of
Battle, Lands of Peace’ in 2005 I was given two pieces of advice by
Richard Holmes. The first was to ensure that every picture told a story
about the location and secondly to avoid being ‘an over-emotional
Celt’. The latter was easy as I myself wanted to get away from the
habit of so many books which either presented battlefields in sombre
black and white or consisted of a preponderance of cemeteries.

Photo 2 The site of ‘Springfield’ bunker where Vaughan spent the night listening to the sound of the wounded drowning in the
shell-holes.
Photo 3 The caves where a German shell killed the wounded who were lying in the foreground.
Photo 2
For many, the intensity of the words of Edwin
Campion Vaughan in ‘Some Desperate Glory’
describing the terrible conditions at St Julien during
the battle of Passchendaele typify the feelings of
despair of so many who survived that battle.
“From the darkness on all sides came the groans
and wails of wounded men; faint, long sobbing
Photo 3
Sometimes a memoir provides a description of the
ground which renders a guide as redundant. ‘Devil in
the Drum’ by John Lucy has an inch perfect
description of the ground where the Royal Irish
Rifles fought on the Aisne in 1914.
Another company took our place in the front and we
went underground into conveniently situated large
caves, a little distance in rear of the line. The medical
officer had opened up his dressing station at the mouth
of one cave and was already busy attending the
wounded and the dead. He went along the line of those
who had been hit and his preliminary test for life in
each lying figure seemed to be a pinch under the jaw.
We were ordered to fall in outside the caves and out we
went shying a bit at the sight of blood-dripping stretchers
propped against the wall of the cave mouth ... a hollow in
the ground about 10 yards from the caves was filled with
bandaged wounded .... they did not seem very distressed...
a rising tearing noise like that of an approaching train
heralded the arrival of a heavy shell...we crouched down
where we were...we closed our teeth to the shattering
burst, which seemed right on top of us ... I raised my head
to see that the shell had exploded precisely over the
hollow and killed every one of the wounded.
…We fixed our bayonets, as the enemy were close,
our task being to engage any enemy on our front...My
brother’s platoon suddenly got the order, unheard by
me, and up went the men on the open grassland. Denis
went ahead…He…presented a good picture of the
young leader going into battle ... I shouted to him:
“Take care of yourself”…My brother steadied a
moment in a stride which was beginning to break into a
steady run forward and looking back over his shoulder
winked re-assuringly at me. The beggar could wink.
Forward he went, and out of my sight for ever.
Photo 1
By way of illustration, we all know that on 1 July
1916 there were 60,000 casualties. By the very nature
of those losses there are very few personal front line
accounts but one which stands out for me is that of
Edward Liveing, serving with the 12th. London
Regiment at Gommecourt, whose account, ‘Attack
on the Somme’, combines revealing detail and subtle
comment as he describes how:
“I started off at the prearranged walk. A
continuous hissing noise all around one ... signified
that the Germans machine gunners had become
aware of our presence ... in front the ground was
pitted by innumerable shell-holes... Here and there a
few bodies lay about ... one man after another fell
down in a seemingly natural manner and the wave
melted away. ... I came up to the German wire ... and
advanced to a gap in the German wire. There was a
pile of our wounded here ... Suddenly I cursed. I had
been scalded in the right hip ... I dropped forward
full length on the ground”.
Liveing started to crawl back towards his own lines.
“Little holes opened in the ground on either side of
me and I understood that I was under machine-gun
fire. ... I fell down into a sunken road with several
other wounded ... the Germans had a machine gun
on that road and only a few of us got across.”
Finally, he reached Hebuterne where:
“.. the RAMC were bandaging the ever-
increasing flow of wounded. Amongst them a
captive German in green uniform with a Red Cross
round his sleeve was hard at work. Everything
seemed so different from the deadly strife a
thousand yards away. There, foe was inflicting
wounds to foe; here were our men attending to the
German wounded and the Germans attending to
ours ... Here were both sides united in a common
attempt to repair the ravages of war. Humanity had
at last asserted itself.”
moans of agony, and despairing shrieks. It was too
horribly obvious that dozens of men with serious
wounds must have crawled for safety into new shell-
holes, and now the water was rising about them and,
powerless to move, they were slowly drowning...and
we could do nothing to help them...
At about 9 am I dragged myself wearily out to
take a muster parade on which my worst fears were
realised. It was a terrible list…Feeling sick and
lonely I returned to my tent to write out my
casualty report; but instead I sat on the floor and
drank whisky after whisky as I gazed into a black
and empty future.”

Photo 4 Richard Holmes told me that whenever he visited this cave, he was ‘deafened by the sound of silent voices singing La
Marseillaise.’
Photo 4
Not far away is the remarkable Chapelle de Pére
Doncoeur, created by the French poilus in an
underground limestone quarry. An anonymous soldier
described it thus:
“.. a sergeant in my company, Theo Potel, is an
amateur painter and at the end of the cave we have
made, in a big oval niche, a cross with Christ
around which he has painted the light of the rising
sun in a superb red…On the two sides of the chapel
Potel has painted flowers for us which has a
beautiful effect.. for light there are two small
candlesticks each with four candles on the altar:
two other big ones with six candles stand on either
side of the altar. For decoration on either side there
are two splendid fir trees.
Now comes the hour. The lights are glowing and
the singers are near the altar...A huge crowd of men
take their place in the corridor. Everyone gathers
their thoughts and the mass begins.
The moment of the elevation comes: the piquet
are carrying arms as the bugles have just sounded
the call to arms...and then to finish the Mass we
sing three verses of the Marseillaise. At that
moment, it was so beautiful it brought tears to
one’s eyes...”.
Photo 5 (cover photo)
Sometimes, quite literally, a sudden burst of light on the
landscape brings the writer’s words to life. On 7 June
1917 Phillip Gibbs, the war correspondent for the Daily
Telegraph, witnessed the awesome series of exploding
mines along the Messines ridge and wrote that...
“great leaping streams of orange flame shot
upwards, each a huge volcano...along the front of
attack followed by terrific explosions and dense masses
of smoke and dust which stood like pillars towering
into the sky, all illuminated by the fires below”.
Photo 6 The French trenches where Junger found himself surrounded by French dead.
Photo 6
That most vivid of writers, Ernst Junger, also recounts
an encounter with the dead in ‘Storm of Steel’, surely
one of the defining books of the conflict. Junger’s
diaries reveal in great detail his exact position so in
April 1915 one can place him to within fifty meters in
woods near Les Éparges when:
“Through a stuttering swathe of machine-gun
fire. we plunged back into our communication
trench, and moved to a position on the edge of the
wood, previously held by the French. A sweetish
smell and a bundle hanging in the wire caught my
attention. In the rising mist, I leaped out of the
trench and found a shrunken French corpse... all
around were dozens more, rotted, dried, stiffened to
mummies, frozen in an eerie dance of death.”
He then describes how he gets shot and he:
“… ran towards the trench we had come from...it
was choked with seriously wounded and dying
men... this was the home of the great god Pain, and
for the first time I looked through a devilish chink
in the depths of his realm. … I lost my head
completely. Ruthlessly I barged past everyone on my
path … Like a bolting horse, I rushed through the
dense undergrowth, across paths and clearings, till I
collapsed in a copse by the Grande Tranchee”.
I am aware that many people dislike Junger’s blunt
descriptions of killing his enemies - surely that is what
soldier are supposed to do in the course of their ‘work’?
- but I think this confession of his panic, even
cowardice, endows his work with a total honesty that
one has to respect.

VIRTUALLY A BATTLEFIELD
STUDY
John Greenacre
www.gbg-international.com | 03www.gbg-international.com | 3534 | Despatches
Photo 7
J R R Tolkien derived much imagery from his time
serving with the Lancashire Fusiliers in the Ancre Valley
and in The Two Towers he describes how:
“…cold clammy winter still held sway in this
forsaken country. The only green was the scum of
livid weed on the dark greasy surfaces of the sullen
waters. Dead grasses and rotting reeds loomed up in
the mists…Dead grasses and rotting reeds loomed up
in the mists...Sam tripped...for a moment the water
below him looked like some window, glazed with
grimy glass through which he was peering...“There
are dead things, dead faces in the water,” he said with
horror. “Dead Faces! at which point Gollum, their
guide, explains: “There was great battle long ago…
the Marshes have grown since then, swallowed up
the graves… you cannot reach them, you cannot
touch them…All dead.”
Photo 7 The marshes of the Ancre.
I entered into remote discussions with the
company commander delegated to run the event to
talk through the themes and format. We decided on
Operation MARKET GARDEN as the battle on
which to base the study. The advance of XXX Corps
provides strong themes that are relevant to the new
British Army Strike capability that the Scots Guards
are due to adopt in 2022 as does the isolated fight of
British 1st Airborne Division at Arnhem. On top of
that, the involvement of the Guards Armoured
Division provided a link to the Scots Guards’ wider
heritage – in fact the battalion has recently readopted
the Guards Armoured Division insignia.
We settled on a format for the event, which would
be run over three days. I agreed to produce resources
and the technical details of the delivery would be the
Towards the end of April, at the height of the COVID-19 induced lockdown, the Guild
secretary circulated a request for a guide to run a ‘virtual’ battlefield tour. With time on my
hands I responded and was lucky enough to be selected by the client who turned out to be
1st Battalion, Scots Guards.
responsibility of the battalion. The entire event
would delivered over Zoom (you know, that platform
none of us had heard of at the beginning of this
year). Officers and soldiers from the battalion would
be broken down by company and each company
would host a group at various locations around the
battalion’s barracks in Aldershot, taking social
distancing guidelines into account. Each group would
have IT connected to a projector and speakers ready
to host Zoom. One company was still dispersed so its
members would access the event individually on their
own devices from their homes across Scotland and
England. Each day began with a connectivity check
and a short introduction from the commanding
officer. I then took the lead and delivered a one hour
presentation over Zoom from the comfort of my own
study, appearing on several big screens around
Aldershot like a budget basement Bond villain. Day 1
focused on the Guards Armoured Division’s advance,
Day 2 on 1st Airborne Division’s battle around
Arnhem and Day 3 on the British Army’s approach
to leadership, discipline and morale during the
Second World War. After a session for questions and
answers the study leader allocated topics and
questions to each company group that would shape
the following discussion. Zoom then shut down and
the companies went into (socially distanced) huddles
to discuss the discussion questions they had been set.
After lunch the Zoom session reconvened and the
commanding officer took the lead in the group
discussions with historical input from me where
required. I then summed up some of the historical
points before the session closed down for the day.
So, what did I learn from the experience?
1. The British Army’s connectivity is not as good
as you might assume. Despite a technical rehearsal
Day 1 was subject to problems with connectivity.
Some groups struggled to conduct their discussions
over a video link and even voice connections broke
down at times. By Day 2 however, the battalion had
reconfigured and moved some group locations andDelivering virtually has advantages.

everything ran far more smoothly. When companies
back-briefed their discussion points they either used
the ‘share screen’ function to talk over bullet points
on Powerpoint or explained diagrams held up to
camera on whiteboards or flip boards.
2. An audience will commit to a virtual event.
Clearly it’s more difficult to judge how well you are
reaching your audience when you are presenting to
them over the ether but the questions that followed
each session were perceptive and clearly
demonstrated that the audience had been paying
attention and bought in to the material. The
discussions were lively and well informed with all
ranks delivering to a high standard. Everyone who
took part agreed it was noticeable that the junior
soldiers were more willing to step forward and
contribute than they might have been during a
‘traditional’ battlefield study.
3. You can reach a wide audience
remotely. Whereas on a physical battlefield
study you might have an audience of thirty
or forty in this case 120 members of the
battalion were taking part simultaneously,
spreading the knowledge and discussion to
a far wider audience.
4. There are advantages to delivering
virtually. There is a lot to be said for
delivering an event like this from your own
home. I was never far from the kettle or a
toilet and could take advantage of both
when not presenting on screen. My books
were to hand so I could make a sneaky
reference to them when asked the
inevitable tricky question. And finally, as
long as you look presentable from the
chest up you can dress for comfort.
“But hold on” I hear you all cry, “this is
not a battlefield tour!” And, of course, you
would be absolutely correct,
it’s not. It is absolutely no
substitute for being on the
battlefield, being able to
explain the lie of the land to
your audience face to face
and doing what we do best.
In fact I would not even rate
it as a virtual battlefield
study. Rather it was a
remotely delivered study day
based around a battlefield
theme as a vehicle to
promote discussion on
current issues. That being
accepted it was a highly
successful event. It was being
treated as a proof of concept
within the British Army and as such it was observed
by members of other regiments and higher formation
headquarters to validate its value. Clearly there are
advantages to the remote approach for the Army and
MOD over a ‘traditional’ battlefield study: It is a far
cheaper option, it can be organised much more
quickly, it can reach a wider audience and you can
mix and match suitable stands from multiple
battlefields in a single event.
As with many facets of life, with the advantages
clear it is likely that the remote approach may persist
beyond the length of the current crisis. It cannot
however, and will not replace battlefield studies
conducted on the battlefield itself. It is more likely to
represent a new parallel strand of professional
development and therefore a new opportunity for
battlefield guides willing to compromise and adapt.
A group of Guardsmen back brief their discussion points.
The author joining the discussion remotely - like a budget Bond villain.
WOTJEK THE POLISH
MILITARY BEAR
David Harrison
A chance sighting of the statue
of a Polish Second World War
soldier and a bear in Princes
Street Gardens, Edinburgh led
to the discovery of a fascinating
story. Investigation revealed
that both had served in ‘Anders
Army’ during the Italian
Campaign.
General Anders had become a Soviet
prisoner of war in 1939 but, following the
German invasion of USSR, had raised an
Army of former Polish PoWs in Central
Asia. Anders Army eventually fought as
part of the British 8th Army in Italy.
Wojtek, a Syrian brown bear, spent 4 years of the war
enlisted in 22nd Company, Polish Army Service Corps
(Artillery), took part in the Battle for Monte Cassino
and all the subsequent 2nd Polish Corps battles. 1946
found Wojtek and his guardian in a Polish
Resettlement Centre in the Scottish Borders. With the
majority of Polish soldiers feeling unable to return to
post war Poland and settling in Britain, Wojtek was
retired to Edinburgh Zoo.
Poland was simultaneously invaded by Germany
and the Soviet Union in 1939. As a consequence of
the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact the country was then
divided between the two aggressors. The Polish Army
had fought gallantly but its prisoners of war
disappeared into German and Soviet labour camps.
The majority of those who went east ended up in
Central Asia. Whilst serving as the British Defence
Attaché in Kazakhstan I recall seeing on the barren
steppe at Spassk, near Karaganda, a subdued
roadside memorial to those Polish soldiers who had
died in the ‘Karaganda Lager’. Following the German
invasion of the Soviet Union in 1941 and the latter’s
subsequent alignment with the Allies, those Polish
soldiers who had survived the KARLAG were
gathered together at Tashkent in Uzbekistan to cross
the Caspian Sea. The British Army in Persia took
responsibility for the training and equipping of what
became known as ‘Anders Army’, after its
Commander, Lieutenant General Wladyslaw Anders.
In April 1942 as the Polish soldiers were making
their way in convoys across Iraq to Palestine, where
their training camps were being prepared, roadside
barter resulted in a group of soldiers acquired a bear
cub. The soldiers now had a mascot whom they
named ‘Wojtek’, Polish for happy warrior. By self-
appointment one of the older members of the
contingent, Peter Prendys, became the bear’s
guardian and Wojtek was adopted as the mascot of
22nd Company, Polish Army Service Corps
(Artillery). He lived with the soldiers in their tented
camp, sharing their rations and adopting a soldierly
penchant for vodka, beer and cigarettes. In turn they
enjoyed wrestling with him and would take him on
their driving duties, allowing him to travel in the cab
of their trucks. He was particularly keen on the chain
operated showers that existed in the desert camps,
learning to operate them in order to cool himself
down! The military hierarchy recognised the positive
effect he had on the morale of the soldiers and
tolerated his occasional misdemeanours. ‘Anders
Army’ was warned for service in Italy and in order to
satisfy military bureaucratic procedures Wojtek was
enlisted into the Polish Army in the rank of Corporal
A statue of Wojtek the Bear in Princes Street Gardens, Edinburgh.

PB 812 ARTICLE – ANALYSIS OF SOURCES USED
SOURCE TYPE USE PROS CONS
Guide to decoding
Met Form 2003.
Official document. To decode individual
station 3-hourly met
records.
Essential to
interpreting records.
Needs expertise to
use.
Crew Photo. Course photo from
1667 HCU.
Ideal intro photo at
stand - links headstones
to real people. Why is
Nesbit-Bell shown as
a Flt Eng ?
On close
examination Nesbit-
Bell is wearing pilot’s
wings, hidden under
his mascot.
None.
‘Boy on a bike’. Eye-witness testimony. Primary source
description of event.
Entirely believable
and corroborates
other evidence.
Hearsay, so potential
errors.
Valve and spring
assembly.
Archaeological. Technical evidence of
speed and state of ac
just prior to crash.
Great ‘stand’ prop.
Corroborates ‘boy
on bike’ and other
evidence of speed
and dive angle of ac.
Needs expert
analysis.
Bomber Command
losses database.
Secondary source
database.
Identify ac, sqn and
crew etc.
A good starting
point.
Incomplete.
CWGC Website. Secondary source
database.
Confirm crew etc.
Evidence of violence
of crash – collective
burial.
From primary
sources.
Not always
completed and can
rely on other less
accurate sources.
CWGC Headstones. Archaeological. A stand in itself. Authoritative. Miss-spaced ?
Daily synoptic charts
and summaries.
Official document.
Primary source.
Synoptic chart is a
good authentic picture
of general weather to
show on a stand.
Authoritative. Needs expert
interpretation for
group.
RAF Cranwell 3-
hourly met records.
Official document.
Primary source.
If shown as a ‘cross
section’ is a clear
presentation of the
weather by time and
height, ideal stand prop.
Authoritative. Needs expert
knowledge to interpret
for group use, and to
understand its
limitations.
460 Sqn ORB. Official document.
Primary source.
Confirms ac and
crew. Useful handout.
Authoritative. Little detail.
Record of Court of
Enquiry.
Official document.
Primary source.
Useful to quote from. Descriptions and
statements of fact are
authoritative.
Opinions are
opinions – see later.
George Plant. Video recording of
description of crash.
Primary source.
Interesting to show to
group (on an iPad)
but …
A wholly plausible
story but actually an
outstanding example
of how time distorts
the memory.
Completely
contradicted by met
records and other
witness.
WO Stanley Moore’s
evidence.
Written evidence to
Court of Enquiry.
Primary source.
Best description of
final moments of ac
and crew. Quote
verbatim at stand.
Moore was a trained
observer making a
contemporaneous
record.
Moore makes an
understandable
assumption.
Letter 460 Sqn to Flt
Sgt Dockery’s father.
Official document.
Primary source.
Read at stand – very
evocative.
Brings home the
single coffin aspect.
Miss-titled.
prior to embarkation from Alexandria in Egypt to
Taranto in Italy in February 1944.
Wojtek first saw action with 2nd Polish Corps at
the 4th Battle of Monte Cassino when 22nd
Company played an important role in the provision
of Artillery support to successive attacks by Polish
Corps units, which led to the ultimate capture of the
Abbey by the Poles on 18 May 1944. Their sacrifice is
poignantly commemorated by the Polish Cemetery
beneath Hill 593. Wojtek had learnt to assist his
colleagues with the unloading of 100-pound boxes of
25 pounder shells by standing upright and allowing
the soldiers to load the boxes onto his outstretched
paws, whereupon he would carry the shells to the
artillery positions before returning
to the transport for more. British
Army Black Watch veteran, John
Clarke testifies:
“I remember it clearly because
it was my twentieth birthday. We
were making our way through the
deserted fields, looking for stray
hens and eggs, when a nearby
artillery unit opened fire. We went
to look and found a battery of
Polish gunners setting up for a
barrage. The gun site was hidden
in a clearing within a large wood.
As we watched, suddenly out of
the wood came a large bear,
walking on its hind legs. It seemed to be carrying
something. Both Vincent and I shouted a warning to
the gunners that a bear was going towards them, but
nobody responded. The bear went up to the trail legs
of the artillery gun and placed a shell on the ground.
The bear then went back into the wood and
reappeared with another shell. By this time, we had
realised that the bear was tame and most likely a
circus bear. We just went on our way.”
After the battle the 22nd Company was given
permission to adopt the insignia of Wojtek carrying a
shell on their uniform and their vehicles - his fame
was assured!
Wojtek continued to serve with 2nd Polish Corps
throughout the Italian Campaign. The formation
remained with 8th Army, successfully liberating
Italian towns on the Adriatic coast where many
memorials commemorate the gratitude of the
communities. Particularly in evidence are the
memorials in the Polish language in the churches at
the Madonna dell’ Ambro, Cingoli and Loreto where
Polish units wintered in 1944/45. Wojtek
undoubtedly took part in Operation OLIVE to
breach the Gothic Line in September 1944 and the
final offensive, Operation GRAPESHOT, to liberate
Bologna in April 1945. ‘Anders Army’ remained in
Italy until 1946 before being moved to Britain.
Significant parts of their country had been absorbed
into Belorussia and Ukraine and the majority of the
soldiers felt unable to return post war to communist
Poland. The 22nd Company found itself at the Polish
Resettlement Centre at Winfield Camp in the Scottish
Borders. Many of the soldiers settled in Britain,
including Wojtek who found himself housed in
Edinburgh Zoo where he remained until his death in
1963. Through the endeavours of the Wojtek
Memorial Trust, a bronze statue has stood on Polish
granite in Princes Street Gardens since 2013 and
honours the courage of Polish soldiers who fought in
World War Two.
Wojtek sits in front of a soldier.
Wojtek doing ‘bear things’ in the cab of a lorry.

HARROGATE TERRIERS
The 1/5th (Territorial)
Battalion West Yorkshire
Regiment in the Great War
By John Sheehan
This book is not just another
narrative of the Great War Rather, it
takes the ready on a journey with
the 1/5th throughout the Great War.
John Sheehan cleverly weaves what was
happening in the greater scheme of things and then zooms
in to this particular battalion. Throughout the narrative
the reader gets to know this close knit set of characters
that make up the battalion, their trials and tribulations
and feelings for what is happening at the front and at
home. A brilliant book interspersed with pictures and
detailed maps. I unreservedly recommend this book to
GBG members.
Review by Jo Hook
Published by Pen & Sword Ltd
RRP £25.00
hardback, 351pp
THE LIGHT DIVISION
IN THE PENINSULAR
WAR 1808-1811
By Tim Saunders and Rob Yuill
This is the first of two volumes
pulling together the many disparate
memoirs of service in the Light
Division. The result is a thorough
and entertaining history. The story
of one of Wellington’s most famous formations is
presented in a coherent and accessible narrative. The
book is lavishly illustrated by the publisher’s standards –
maps, photographs and contemporary art are all blended
into each chapter. The use of re-enactor photographs to
illustrate drill and tactics is subtly done. This is one of
the most readable Napoleonic references to come out for
some time. Well Done Tim & Rob, Good to see the GBG
logos on the flyleaf! Recommended.
RRP £25.00
hardback, pp301
GUIDEbooks:
BLOODY STREETS
The Soviet Assault on Berlin
April 1945
By Aaron Stephan Hamilton
The titanic battle for Berlin began
on 16 April 1945, the Red Army
unleashed an onslaught of
unimaginable power and ferocity
on the desperate defenders of Hitler’s,
already ruined capital. The sixteen-day battle would
cost the vengeful Soviets a horrific price in men and
materiel. This new historical narrative is delivered in a
chronological sequence that is exhaustive in its detail.
The author is an acknowledged academic with extensive
experience in the production of military history studies
for the US Army. The Staff Ride foundation
underpinning this volume is clearly evident throughout -
aerial overviews, contemporary mapping, wartime
photos and extensive reference to recently released
Soviet War Diaries abound. All of this is augmented
with a separate 60 page ‘Reader’ full of maps and
photos. An outstanding Reference on Berlin.
Review by Mike Peters
Second Edition, Published by Helion & Company
RRP £59.95
hardback, pp511 plus pp64 Map Supplement
PEIPER’S WAR
The Wartime Years of SS
Leader Jochen Peiper 1941-44
By Danny S. Parker
Jochen Peiper, surely one of the most
notorious and controversial of the
commanders of Hitler’s Waffen SS. My
initial reaction to yet another book
recounting the crimes and atrocities of Peiper was initially
one of dismay. I must however assure those that may feel
the same way, that this is a considered, and certainly,
comprehensive work. The infamous episodes in the
Ardennes are of course examined, more importantly,
Peiper’s conduct and that of his peers in Russia is also well
documented. New photographs, good maps and well-
written history combine to make an authoritative tome.
Perhaps we do not need any more on Peiper after this one?
Review by Mike Peters
RRP £35.00
hardback, pp620
PB 812 ARTICLE – ANALYSIS OF SOURCES USED - cont’d
SOURCE TYPE USE PROS CONS
Fg Off Luhrs’
evidence.
Written evidence to
Court of Enquiry.
Primary source.
Possibly read at
stand.
Authoritative
technical evidence.
None.
Conclusions of
Court of Enquiry.
Official document.
Based on primary
sources, but a
secondary source in
itself.
A discussion point. The basic verdict is
accurate.
The opinion about the
automatic pilot as an
initial cause is
speculative. There is
always a bias of not
wanting to find
deceased fellow-aircrew
at fault unless the
evidence is absolute.
Conclusions of the
AOC.
Official document.
Secondary source?
The next discussion
point.
A demonstrably
expert opinion. His
explanations show a
commendable balance
of fact and opinion.
None.
Diagram from
Lancaster technical
manual.
Official document. To support
conclusions.
Factual. Needs some technical
knowledge to interpret
correctly.
Lancaster Pilots’
Notes.
Official document. Adds verisimilitude
to discussion.
Factual. Needs experience to
interpret correctly.
Flight test report. Official document. To support author’s
conclusions.
Factual. Needs experience to
interpret correctly.
This article. Secondary source. The final four
paragraphs are the
conclusion of the
story told at the
stand.
An expert analysis
from an experienced
aircrew and staff
officer. Based on a
wide range of
sources.
It is still, however, one
author’s personal
analysis.
Photo of funeral. Primary source. Show at stand. Emphasises collective
coffin.
Paper makes
assumption that it was
just Dockery – first
name in alphabetical
order? Or only family
talked to ?
NEWmembers:
Jan Aerts
Paul Bingley
Paul Docking
Gary Dugmore
Angie Lorimer
Mark Proulx
Mark Rusby
Bryan Stafancyk
New members who have been welcomed to the Guild
between Quarantine Special 2020 and the date of publication.
Mike Still
Merryn Walters

EVENTguide 2020-21
7 Aug - GBG Badged Guides Dinner - Graeme Cooper
14 Aug - Guild Annual Golf Championship - Graeme Cooper
15-18 Sep - Greek Recce, Battles of Artemisium & Thermopylae - David Harvey
16-18 Oct - Portsmouth Weekend with Validation - Tim Stoneman
1-5 Nov - Somme Recce, led by John Cotterill & Paul Oldfield - David Harvey
4 Dec - GBG Christmas Lunch, UJC London - Andy Thompson
2021
29-31 Jan - GBG Annual Conference - Tim Stoneman
15-18 Mar - Portugal Recce, Duke of Wellington’s campaigns - Graeme Cooper
9-11 Apr - Malta Recce, Defence of Malta during WW2 - Bob Shaw
11-12 Sep - Guild Special Forces Recce, WW2 - the development of Special Forces
capabilities - Bob Shaw - rtnshaw@hotmail.com
The above events are planned to take place unless otherwise indicated.
Any Member wishing to plan a new GBG event should contact David Harvey
for guidance and coordination of dates: events@gbg-international.com
THE SOMME 1916
Touring the French Sector
By David O’Mara
“Oh, No! Not another book on the
Somme!” Not my words but those
of the author – although he goes on
to make it clear that his book
intends to be different! Without
doubt he succeeds as the book is an
essential read to those who study
the Somme. Don’t be put off by the title – this is a guide
book NOT another book on the Somme.
The French sector on the Somme is one of the most
neglected of the war – indeed the British army called the
events of 1916 the Battle of the Ancre until 1928 as they
were some distance from the Somme during the entire
battle. Many will be surprised to read that between July –
December 1916 the French, despite battling on the
Verdun sector, committed roughly an equal number of
men to those deployed by Haig in the British sector.
The book divides into two distinct parts.
The first 100 pages cover the background to the French
army, their role in the sector between 1914-16 and the
successes and failures July – Dec 1916. A perspective of
the French role in the battle is reflected in the rate of
attrition with the daily casualty rate being just under 200
more than that at Verdun. The research supporting the
narrative is exemplary and the author’s writing style makes
understanding the events comprehensible and straight
forward. The maps are plentiful and help the reader
understand the events and there are dozens of well sourced
images supporting the text.
The second and most substantive part is why the book is
different. Whilst most Battleground books have tours
outlined as an appendix, this book dedicates more than
half its length in outlining 3 major routes that covers,
chronologically both the northern and southern French
sectors. The tours are well researched and include much of
interest from the bigger picture through to the individual
graves of Frenchmen killed during the fighting.
I suspect most GBG members will have extensive libraries
covering the major battles of the Great War and, by
default, their collections will include many of the standard
texts on the Battle of the Somme. This highly readable and
well written book adds greatly to a growing body of
knowledge on a much-neglected aspect of one of the great
battles of the war. The book will inspire many readers to
venture further south than normal when they next travel to
the Somme – with luck they may even get to see the river
that gives its name to the battle!
Review by Andy Thompson
Published by Pen & Sword Books Barnsley
RRP £14.99
hardback, pp240 - 32 Maps & Illustrations throughout.
CASUALTY
EVACUATION FOR
THE SOMME
British Ambulance Train
Provision and Operation
1914-16
By Jeremy Higgins
Written by a lifetime Railwayman
and Army Reservist, this is a well-informed
and meticulously researched account of British Army use
of Ambulance Trains. The level of data and technical
detail on what was previously considered an under-
researched subject is unlikely to be surpassed. Casualty
Evacuation on the Western Front took place on an
unprecedented scale, there are many lessons to learned
from the experience of the campaign on the Somme. This
book is absolutely packed with those lessons, certainly
worth a read if your interests are Medical or Logistic in
nature. Far more interesting than the title might suggest.
Published by Helion & Company Ltd
RRP £25.00
paperback, pp226
ON THE ROAD TO
VICTORY
By Michael Harrison
This relatively slim volume by Michael
Harrison covers the ‘rise of motor
transport with the BEF on the Western
Front’. The book is generally organised
chronologically covering 1914 to 1918
with brief sections on the state of
motor transport (MT) in the UK before and after the
war. There are also chapters covering related subjects
such as the experience of MT drivers the building and
maintenance of roads across the Western Front, vehicle
maintenance and repair and MT’s part in the supply
system. The book is not overly technical or academic and
is written in a straightforward style with a plethora of
photographs and illustrations. Although a niche subject
there is much useful background here and plenty of facts,
figures and anecdotes for the guide to deploy during a
tour of the Western Front.
Review by John Greenacre
Battleground Series Published by Pen & Sword Ltd
RRP £19.99
hardback, pp173
VICTORY AT
GALLIPOLI 1915
The German-Ottoman
Alliance in the
First World War
By Klaus Wolf
Logic suggests that anyone
wanting to understand military
conflict at any level, whether it be a small
skirmish, or an extensive campaign, must adopt a 360
degree view. In simple terms, we must view the battle from
both sides of the hill. yet, this apparently obvious logic is
frequently ignored. Our perception of military history is
too often coloured by what is a one-sided version of events.
This echo-chamber is to be guarded against, we must
always seek as broad and diverse a spectrum of events as
we can collate. Gallipoli is a case in point, the accepted
history of the failed Anglo-French expedition to seize the
Dardanelles is incredibly jaundiced - 'Anzackery' looms
large over the popular narrative, overshadowing the British
soldier's role, totally obscuring his French counterpart. The
Ottoman, gallant Johnny Turk is mentioned, less so his
German comrade.This new book goes a long way toward
re-balancing the narrative. The source material is
impressive, the level of map coverage, photographs and
anecdotal accounts, equally so. This is a quality addition to
the Gallipoli Reference library.
RRP £24.00
hardback, pp384
FIGHTING THROUGH
TO HITLER’S
GERMANY
Personal Accounts of the
Men of 1 Suffolk 1944-45
By Mark Forsdike
This is an impressive debut book
from a new young author. The style
combines the classic post-war battalion history, with a
modern template. The result is an intimate narrative, with
an abundance of personal accounts, clear maps, and some
great photographs. Ideal material for the Battlefield
Guide planning to follow an individual battalion from
Normandy onwards.
Published by Pen & Sword
RRP £25.00
hardback, pp294

In each edition of ‘Despatches’, we will be introducing a
member of the Guild. In this edition, it is Edwin Popken.
1. How long have you been interested in battlefields
and what was it that initially attracted your interest?
My interest started as a teenager reading WW2 history
books and watching films and documentaries. The
magnitude and impact of WW2 simply grabbed me.
Soon, I wanted to see for myself where these events
actually happened and what these locations actually
looked like in order to better understand these events. .
2. Have any experiences stood out? Quite a few. One of
the most impressive ones was with a client from
Canada. We were following in his uncle’s footsteps who
died of wounds in March 1945 during Operation
Blockbuster. I had been able to find the location of the
Clearing Station where he passed away. While there, my
client showed me a picture of his uncle’s field grave. He
explained it was taken by another uncle who visited the
grave and that the field grave was opposite the Clearing
Station. We looked around but could not identify a
reference building in the picture. Then, a German
woman came out of the farmhouse and asked what we
were doing. I explained and we showed her the picture.
She immediately identified it as her dad’s old smithery,
which was demolished in the 70s. Joining Canadian,
Dutch and German efforts we then pinpointed the
precise location of the uncle’s former field grave.
3. What do you enjoy the most about battlefield
guiding? The fact that battlefield guiding is not
only about teaching people about history and
showing where things happened, but that it also is a
learning experience. Each tour, clients share their
own family or personal war experiences with me. I
always learn something new. Many times, these
interactions have been the start of friendships and
connections on social media I still enjoy today.
4. What is your favourite stand, location or battlefield
and why? Every location or battlefield has its own
unique and special aspects, making this a hard
question. However, I do like going to those places that
are off the beaten path and tell lesser known but still
poignant stories. Some examples: Hill 504 near
Schönberg (Ardennes), US 4th ID’s trail in the Hürtgen
Forest, Yorkshire bridge (Rhineland) and Captain
Weatherby’s action near Son bridge (Market Garden).
Name: Edwin Popken
Age: 49
Nationality: Dutch
Home Location: Nuenen,
The Netherlands
Tour Company: Battlefield
Discovery
Validating: Proud owner of Badge No. 93
10 Questions: 5. Which battlefield would you like to visit in the
future? There are so many places I would still like
to visit. My bucket list contains, among others:
Sicily, Monte Cassino, Stalingrad, Seelöwe Heights,
Marshall Islands, Okinawa, and several WW1 sites.
6. What have you enjoyed the most about being a
member of the Guild? I like the idea of being a part
of a group of people who share my passion of
history of warfare and guiding. I also enjoy meeting
others at guild events and have made some good
friends at these events.
7. If there was a fire and you could only save one
battlefield-related book or prop, what would you
save and why? Ouch, preferably my entire library
and computer! But pressed for time, I would say
either my Macbook or my backup server, both
containing all my documents, research, tour
descriptions, etc. I would be shocked if I lost all of it.
Though losing all my books … a real nightmare too!
8. What type of group do you think is the most
challenging to lead on a tour? Every group has its
challenges and points to consider. But in my experience
and maybe somewhat ironically, a group of guides is
the most challenging one. I experienced that guides are
very poor at keeping schedule when they are guests
themselves. I have to admit, that also includes myself.
9. What’s the best tip, story or nugget of information
you have been given by a fellow battlefield guide?
Best one was given by a tour manager I travelled with
on several tours for the National World War Two
Museum. She has been tour managing for decades
and knows all the tricks in the book. One time, our
regular toilet break location was unexpectedly closed.
Knowing the area, I directed the coach to another
location where I asked and got permission for our
guests to use the restaurant’s facilities. The restaurant
staff explicitly told me they did not want to charge us
for it, but Maggie nevertheless slipped them 10 euros.
She explained to me later: “The next time they see
this coach stop here, they will remember and
welcome us, even if we only use their toilet facilities.”
10. What is the funniest or most dramatic thing you
have seen on tour? On one of my Easy Company
tours, we had one of the actual veterans, mr Bradford
Freeman, travelling with us as our honoured guest.
While staying in Eindhoven, well-known British
veteran Joe Cattini (50th Northumbrian Division,
artillery) was staying in the same hotel. Both veterans
met and were posing for the guests to make pictures
of the two of them. Joe started talking to Brad, asking
if he had been in Eindhoven in 1944. Brad replied yes
and went on to say that he had fought in Normandy,
The Netherlands and in Bastogne. Whereupon Joe
exclaimed: “I was in Bastogne too! We fired in
support of you during the siege!” Brad kindly nodded
in gratitude. Of course, Joe Cattini never was in
Bastogne; the British were on the other side of the
Bulge. We all just smiled and didn’t mentioned it,
because that conversation between these two veterans
was not only funny but also very adoring.

Despatches summer-2020 Battlefield Guides

More Related Content

What's hot (6)

Recently uploaded (20)

Despatches summer-2020 Battlefield Guides