Detection of Attacker using Honeywords

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 6 Issue 4, May-June 2022 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470
@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD50074 | Volume – 6 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2022 Page 827
Detection of Attacker using Honeywords
Senthilnayaki B1
, Mahalakshmi G1
, Dharanyadevi P2
, Narashiman D1
1
Department of Information Science and Technology, CEG, Anna University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2
Department of CSE, Puducherry Technological University, Pillaichavadi, Puducherry, India
ABSTRACT
With the growth of the Internet, there has been a tremendous increase
in the number of attacks, and therefore intrusion detection systems
(IDS’s) have become a mainstay of information security. The
purpose of IDS is to help the computer systems deal with attacks.
This anomaly detection system creates a database of normal
behaviour and deviations from normal behaviour to trigger events
during the occurrence of intrusions. Based on the source of data, IDS
are classified into host-based IDS and network-based IDS. The
proposed work is to validate the correct user or attacker. The system
is identified as an abnormal user. An alert will be sent to the
authorised user. The proposed system is to supply the fake
information to the attacker by using the honeywords technique. A
new system is proposed to secure content from various unauthorised
users.
KEYWORDS: Honeywords, Security, Password, Hash Function,
Authentication, Attacker
How to cite this paper: Senthilnayaki B |
Mahalakshmi G | Dharanyadevi P |
Narashiman D "Detection of Attacker
using Honeywords"
Published in
International Journal
of Trend in
Scientific Research
and Development
(ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456-
6470, Volume-6 |
Issue-4, June 2022, pp.827-831, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd50074.pdf
Copyright © 2022 by author(s) and
International Journal of Trend in
Scientific Research and Development
Journal. This is an
Open Access article
distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons
Attribution License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
INTRODUCTION
Network security provides the policies and techniques
used to prevent and monitor illegal access, abuse,
modification, or denial of a computer network. The
network administrator controls network security,
which entails the permission of access to data on the
network. Users select or are granted an ID, password,
or other type of authentication that gives them access
to information and applications under their control.
Network security refers to a wide range of public and
private computer networks that are utilised in
everyday tasks such as completing transactions and
communications between organizations, government
agencies, and individuals. Hence, it concerns security
for accessing the data from organizations,
corporations, and other sorts of institutions. It secures
the network while also safeguarding and managing
activities. Assigning a unique name and password to a
network resource is the most popular and
straightforward method of safeguarding it.
Honeyword
Honeywords are phoney passwords that are kept
together with actual passwords and are linked to each
user's account. When an attacker obtains the
password list, he or she retrieves a large number of
password candidates for each account, and the
intruder has no way of knowing which one is correct.
As a result, if an intruder attempts to log in using a
honeyword, the cracked password files can be
discovered by the system administrator. Exposure of
passwords is a serious security issue that has
prompted a huge number of users and organizations,
including Yahoo, Rock You, LinkedIn, eHarmony,
and Adobe, to take action. One way of detecting the
existence of a password database breach is to use a
honeypot.
The administrator establishes fake user accounts on
purpose to catch intruders and detects a password leak
if any of the honeypot credentials are utilized.
Making password hashing more complicated and
time-consuming is another way to improve the
problem. For each account, the Honeyword technique
involves having many possible passwords, only one
of which is correct. The false page is used to give the
hacker the impression of accessing the original data.
This decoy page is a fake page that the hacker
accesses as if it were the real thing. Also, when the
IJTSRD50074

International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
hacker accesses the fake website, the legitimate user
will quickly notice through warnings that an
unauthorised user is attempting to access the page.
Using the honeywords technique, a novel system is
constructed in this paper. The system's basic concept
may be utilised as a platform in institutes, businesses,
and anywhere else where credential data is protected
by a password. It also aids in the monitoring of
administrative procedures and the evaluation of
performance in order to make improvements. This
system takes advantage of services like notification,
which increases the system's overall efficiency and
customer happiness.
LITERATURE SURVEY
Imran (2016) provided a new honeyword generating
method, which produces better results in terms of
flatness. When honeywords are appropriately chosen,
a cyber-attacker who bargains a file of hashed
passwords has no way of knowing whether the
password is the real one or a honeyword for any
account. Senthilnayaki et al. (2015) studied several
forms of network system attacks and classified them
using multiple classifications.
Rivest (2013) developed a way of making hashed
passwords more secure. Honeywords must be
generated for each user account to increase security.
When an attacker acquires a file of hashed passwords
and inverts the hash function, the author has no way
of knowing whether they have discovered the
password or a honeyword. With developments in
graphics processing unit (GPU) technology, Kardas et
al. (2013) suggested a way to crack a password hash
significantly simpler. No server can detect any
unauthorised user authentication once the password
has been obtained.
Malone and Maher (2012) investigate how passwords
are chosen and shared. In lists of chosen terms, Zipf's
Law is commonly found. The authors analyse if Zipf's
law is a viable contender for characterising the
frequency with which passwords are chosen using
password lists from four different online sources.
Komal et al. (2016) employed the honeywords
approach to protect against assaults by unauthorized
insiders, preventing them from discerning between
genuine sensitive customer data and useless data.
Senthilnayaki and colleagues (2021), In this article,
authors simulated Ad Hoc On-Demand Distance
Vector networks and examined the impact of different
assaults on the network, including wormhole, black
hole, and flooding attacks. Researchers are employed
WEKA as data mining tools for analysis, which let us
retrieve transmitted, received, and discarded packet
information in the networks under assault.
Manisha (2015) suggested the Chaffing-With-
Tweaking method. The user password is used to seed
the generating algorithm, which then changes chosen
character locations of the genuine password to
generate honeywords. When irregular information
access is identified, Dipali and Shyam (2014)
provided a method for assessing whether data access
is permitted or not. Providing false information to the
attacker. This guards against the abuse of the users'
personal information. Senthilnayaki et al (2015)
reviewed different types of attacks affected in
network system and provides various classification to
classifies. Sethilnayaki et al (2021) provides the
anomaly detection system creates a database of usual
behavior and deviations from it, which it utilizes to
trigger intrusion detection when it happens. Based on
the data source, the IDS model is separated into two
types: hostbased IDS and network-based IDS.
Honeywords are generated using a variety of current
honeyword creation techniques. As a result, every
attempted login puts the attacker at danger of being
identified. The attacker will also be noticed if they
use a brute force approach.
PROPOSED SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE
The system architecture of the proposed work is shown in Figure 1. It consists of various modules, namely user
registration module, honey words generation module, cloud storage, authentication checking, and alert
generation.
Figure 1 Unauthorized User System Architecture
User
Registration
Password &
Honeywords Module
Cloud
Storage
Authorized
User
Unauthorized User
Generate Alert
Authentication
Checking

In this proposed work, first create a user profile using
the registration module and then generate the user
account. Using this information, the registered users
can access the data from the database server. Using an
existing user account, the system is allowed to access
organisational network data. Hence, they are allowed
to access their application using the correct login
account message. However, the server responds to the
end user query based on the authorised users' request.
The database server contains username, password,
questions and answers with personal information. The
authentication checking module is used to check for a
legitimate user or a decoy user. The system is
detected by an authorised user, then they are allowed
to access the organisational database. Else, the user is
allowed to access fake pages and this information is
sent to the admin.
Honeyword Checker
The proposed is to create the module called
"authentication checking" here to check and allow
correct information on user pages with the help of
honeywords. Using honeychecker is to collect
hardened systems where the information is stored in
secret. The detection of anomalies in the system
should have lots of experimentation done by using
honeychecker. Once the checker detects the anomaly,
it generates an alert message and sends it to an
administrator or other authorised person. After
sending the silent alert to the correct user, the checker
continues the system work. Later, the checker acts as
a login monitoring system and tracks the processed
operation.
Honeyword Generation Algorithm
Password files contain a number of security issues
that have impacted millions of individuals and
businesses. If a password file is stolen or stolen, it is
straightforward to capture most of the plaintext and
encrypt passwords using password cracking tools and
decryption procedures. So we used honey word
creations in this proposed module. That is, the user's
password and registered questions are merged, and a
key with the name "unknown" is generated.
Honey Word Generator:
Step1: Get the position po of the input and password
pa.
Step2: reverse the order of the password.
Step3: From 1 to 20, repeat the following steps.
Step4: If each position po corresponds to the
checking value,
With pa, assign a real password.
Create a new hash password.
Step5: Otherwise, use the real password as the
replacement password.
Step6: Create a new hash password
Step7: The password is a hashmap
Step8: Retrieve the password result
The general flow of the algorithm is
1. Receive string input of password
2. Determine the string's category or categories.
3. Choose the number of buckets
4. Fill bucket with chaff after placing password in it.
5. Fill the remaining buckets with chaff from the
respective strategy.
6. Shuffle the set of honeywords and locate the
password.
7. return the honeyword set and the sugarword index
EXPERIMENTATION RESULTS
This section explains the implementation details of
the proposed work. The experimental has been done
in Java using NetBeans. First, the hacker detection
proposed system is a registration page. On the
registration page, you must enter your name, user
name, email address, password, confirm password,
contact number, and address. The user must register if
they are not already a registered user. Figure 2 shows
the registration page for the user.
Figure 2 User Registration Form

The system collects the page for the planned
honeyword generation procedure. All of them include
inquiries, such as phone model, mother's name, and
school name. People have a pet name, a favorite
colour, favorite food, favorite drink, a nickname, a
favorite season, and a favorite place. The replies to
these questions form the basis of the honeyword
production process. After that, go to the legal page by
logging in with the right username and password. If a
phoney user tries to view the page, the task is
delegated to a fake page. Finally, the authorized user
receives the alert message. This shows how the
system handles notifications. An alarm will ring if the
honeywords are typed incorrectly more than three
times, informing the original user of the password
breach. It will take them to a fake website that looks
just like the real one. That page will keep track of
them and provide the original user with the updated
information. Figure 3 gives the email message to the
authorized person.
Figure 3 Email Notification Message
The comparison clarifies the distinctions between the
present and existing systems. It describes the aspects
of the proposed system as well as its performance
characteristics. Table 1 compares the features of the
existing and proposed systems.
Table 1 Comparison of Existing and Proposed
Systems
PARAMET ER
EXISTING
SYSTEM
PROPOSED
SYSTEM
Notification Absent Using email
ip detection Absent Present
Record Activities Absent Present
Speed of performance
evolution
slow Fast
The present system lacks feature such as notification,
IP detection, and activity recording, but the proposed
system does. It sends out alert notifications through
email. Performance is evolving at a faster rate than
the current system. As a consequence, the suggested
system outperforms the current system significantly.
CONCLUSION
The honeywords technique is used to create a new
system in this proposed work. The system's basic
concept may be utilised as a platform in institutes,
businesses, and anywhere else where credential data
is protected by a password. It also aids in the
monitoring of administrative procedures and the
evaluation of performance in order to make decisions
for improvement. This system takes advantage of
services like notification, which increases the
system's overall efficiency and customer happiness.
In the future, this work will be extended to include
better notification techniques.
References
[1] Imran Erguler, (2016). ‘Achieving Flatness:
Selecting the Honeywords from Existing User
Passwords’, IEEE Transactions on Dependable
and Secure Computing, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 284-
295.
[2] Senthilnayaki B, G. Mahalakshmi,
Duraimurugan, Anbarasi N and Prasath Kumar,
“Intrusion Detection Using Information Gain
Feature Selection and Classification",
International Research Journal of Humanities
and Interdisciplinary Studies, vol 2. no 11, pp
155-166, 2021.
[3] R. L. Rivest and Juels, (2013). ‘Honeywords:
Making password cracking detectable’, in
ACM SIGSAC conference on Computer &
communications security, pp. 145-159.
[4] GenKardas, S and Kiraz, M. S. (2013).
‘Examination of a New Defense Mechanism:
Honeywords’. IACR Cryptology ePrint
Archive, pp. 690-696.
[5] D. Malone and K. Maher. (2012).
‘Investigating the Distribution of Password
Choices’, in ACM 21st International
Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 301-310.
[6] Ms.Komal Naik, Varsha Bhosale and Vinayak
D.Shinde. (2016). ‘Generating Honeywords
from Real Passwords with Decoy Mechanism’.
International Journal for Research in
Engineering Application & Management. Vol.
2, no.4, pp. 1-7.
[7] Senthilnayaki, B., Chandralekha, M and
Venkatalakshmi, K, “Survey of data mining
technique used for intrusion detection”,
International Journal of Technology and
Engineering System, vol.7, no 2, pp.166-171,
2015.
[8] Senthilnayaki, B, Anbarasi, N., Mahalakshmi,
G and Duraimurugan, J, (2021). IoT: Analysis
of Various Attacks Using AODV Protocol.
International Journal of Progressive Research in
Science and Engineering, 2(11), 29-32, 2021.
[9] Manisha Jagannath Bhole. (2015).
‘Honeywords: A New Approach For Enhancing
Security’. International Research Journal of
Engineering and Technology (IRJET). Vol.2,
no. 8, pp. 1563-1566.

[10] Dipali Dhumal, Shyam Gupta. (2015).
‘Effective Approach to Detection of Password
File Using Honeywords’. International Journal
of Science and Research (IJSR). vol. 4, no. 12,
pp. 930-932.
[11] Balakrishnan, S., Venkatalakshmi, K., &
Kannan, A. (2014). Intrusion detection system
using feature selection and classification
technique. International journal of computer
science and application, 3(4), 145-151.
[12] F. Cohen. (2006). ‘The use of deception
techniques: Honeypots and decoys’. Handbook
on Information Security, vol. 3, pp. 646–655.
[13] Senthilnayaki, B., Venkatalakshmi, K., &
Kannan, A. (2019). Intrusion detection system
using fuzzy rough set feature selection and
modified KNN classifier. Int. Arab J. Inf.
Technol., 16(4), 746-753.

Detection of Attacker using Honeywords

More Related Content

Similar to Detection of Attacker using Honeywords (20)

More from ijtsrd (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Detection of Attacker using Honeywords