SlideShare a Scribd company logo
 You've taken on a design challenge and come up with
  a solution that's been widely admired and won you
  awards. But a year or so later, you realize there was a
  mistake. There's something horribly wrong with your
  design. And it's not just something cosmetic — a badly
  resolved corner etc. — but a fundamental flaw that will
  almost certainly lead to catastrophic failure. And that
  failure will result not just in embarrassment, or
  professional ruin, but death, the death of thousands of
  people.
 You are the only person that knows that something's
  wrong. What would you do?
Doing the Right
    T hing
 The Citicorp Center Case
   William LeMessurier
 This sounds like a hypothetical question.
  But it's not. It's the question that
  structural engineer William LeMessurier
  faced on a lonely July weekend about 30
  years ago.
 Citicorp Center in New York with its distinctive forty-five degree
  diagonal crown, the Citicorp building is one of the most
  recognizable skyscrapers on the New York City skyline. With fifty-
  nine stories, it's the third tallest building in midtown Manhattan,
  and at the time of its completion it was the seventh-tallest building
  in the world. At ground level, the huge skyscraper almost seems
  to hover above Lexington Avenue, held aloft by four massive, 114-
  foot-tall stilts which are located at the center of each side rather
  than on the corners. This unusual architecture was one of
  necessity– the structure had to be built around the landmark St.
  Peter's Church– but the design left room for a serious engineering
  flaw which went completely unnoticed during its construction and
  initial use. Had the weakness not been accidentally discovered
  and secretly fixed, the mighty skyscraper could have been
  collapsed by a hard blast of air of wind without any warning.
Citicorp Center
 The building's structural skeleton was designed by an engineer
  named William J. LeMessurier (pronounced "La Measure") in the
  early 1970s. Making room for the St. Peter's church was a difficult
  problem, but LeMessurier was a highly capable and creative
  engineer. His design called for the building to sit atop nine-story-
  tall stilts, one centered on each side with a specific geometry in
  the structure's framing to take maximum advantage of the oddly
  placed support columns. It also had a single, narrower column in
  the center which housed the building's elevator banks and
  provided additional strength to the framing. This design made
  room for the church under the building's northwest corner, and
  gave the giant structure a graceful, almost levitating effect.
Doingtherightthing
Doingtherightthing
   LeMessurier first became aware of the building's weakness in 1978, about
    a year after its completion. An engineering student contacted him to ask
    some technical questions about the design, which he was delighted to
    address. The student's professor had expressed doubts regarding the
    strength of a stilted skyscraper where the support columns were not on
    the corners. "Listen, I want you to tell your teacher that he doesn't know
    what the hell he's talking about," LeMessurier told the student, "because
    he doesn't know the problem that had to be solved." He went on to
    explain how the building's framing geometry worked perfectly with the
    stilts in such positions, allowing it to withstand very forceful winds, even
    from a diagonal angle.
   But the conversation got him thinking, and he started doing some
    calculations on just how much diagonal wind the structure could
    withstand. He was particularly interested in the effects of an engineering
    change made during construction which had seemed caring at the time:
    numerous joints were secured with bolts rather than welds. Normally such
    a change was acceptable, but the Citicorp Center's design was unusually
    sensitive to diagonal winds, which the builders hadn't realized. The results
    of his calculations were troubling.
Doingtherightthing
 He took his calculations to fellow engineer Alan
  Davenport, who was an expert on the behavior of
  buildings in high-wind conditions. Davenport found that
  seventy-mile-per-hour gusts would be sufficient to
  break the bolts holding the joints, resulting in structural
  failure. Such winds were not unknown in New York,
  indeed storms with such strength occurred about once
  every sixteen years on average. Hurricane season was
  fast approaching, and now only two men in the world
  knew that Citicorp's new $175 million tower and its
  occupants were vulnerable to destruction by
  catastrophic collapse.
Doingtherightthing
 Horrified, LeMessurier fled to his island hideaway on
  Sebago Lake to refine the findings and consider his
  options. Because he faced possible litigation,
  bankruptcy, and professional disgrace he contemplated
  suicide, but he was struck with the realization that he
  held the information to initiate extraordinary events
  which could save thousands of lives. The following day
  he started making phone calls. After speaking with
  corporate lawyers and consulting with Leslie
  Robertson– an engineer who helped design the World
  Trade Center– LeMessurier went to Cambridge to
  inform Hugh Stubbins, Jr., the building's architect.
  Stubbins winced when he heard the news.
Doingtherightthing
   Together they flew to New York City to confront the executive officers of
    Citicorp with the dilemma. "I have a real problem for you, sir,"
    LeMessurier said to Citicorp's executive vice-president, John S. Reed.
    The two men outlined the design flaw and described their proposed
    solution: to systematically reinforce all 200+ bolted joints by welding two-
    inch-thick steel plates over them.
   Work began immediately, and continued around the clock for three
    months. Welders worked all night, and carpenters labored during the day.
    In case of imminent disaster, an evacuation plan was put in place for the
    surrounding area, but the general public knew nothing of the
    circumstances… the press was on strike at that time, so news of the
    repairs did not disseminate to the populace. About halfway into the repairs
    Hurricane Ella formed, and it appeared to be on a collision course with
    Manhattan, but fortunately the storm veered out to sea rather than testing
    the limits of the half-repaired building. The reinforcements were
    completed in September of 1978, and the entire structure was re-
    evaluated for safety. Following the repairs, the building was found to be
    one of the most sturdy skyscrapers in the world. Despite the success, the
    crisis was kept hidden from the public for almost twenty years, until an
    article appeared in the New Yorker in 1995.
Doingtherightthing
 As for LeMessurier, the executives at Citicorp
  asked no more than the $2 million his
  insurance policy covered, despite the fact that
  the repairs alone cost over $8 million. It is
  generally thought that his honesty so
  impressed the executives that they decided to
  keep their lawyers at bay. It is clear that it
  takes a lot of character to admit one's own
  mistakes, but in accepting responsibility for this
  flaw and then leading the repair effort, the
  character shown by William J. LeMessurier
  was nothing short of heroic.
Citicorp Center
standing over St.
Peter's church
 The story of William LeMessurier and
  Citicorp Center was first told in a brilliant
  New Yorker article by Joe Morgenstern in
  1995, "The Fifty-Nine-Story Crisis."
Doingtherightthing
Doingtherightthing

More Related Content

PPT
PPT ON BURJ AL ARAB
PPTX
Earthquake reistant structures
PPTX
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 8 - Structural Analysis for Lateral ...
PPTX
Taipei 101
PPTX
Burj khalifa , its engineering as well as architectural features and facts.
PPT
Introduction To Building Codes
PPTX
Group8 empire state building
PPTX
High Rise Structures.pptx
PPT ON BURJ AL ARAB
Earthquake reistant structures
CE 72.32 (January 2016 Semester) Lecture 8 - Structural Analysis for Lateral ...
Taipei 101
Burj khalifa , its engineering as well as architectural features and facts.
Introduction To Building Codes
Group8 empire state building
High Rise Structures.pptx

What's hot (20)

PPTX
analysis of high rise building
PDF
115659118 pre-engineered-buildings
PPTX
CT3 1c aluminium formwork+
PPTX
Shear wall
DOC
Modular building seminar REPORT 1
PPT
Ch 04 Building and Fire Codes
PDF
Skyscrapers
PPT
Sydney harbour bridge
PPTX
Taipei 101
PPTX
Skyscrapers
PPTX
The taipei 101 tower
PPTX
earthquake resistant design
PPT
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OUTRIGGER STRUCTURE WITH DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS
PPTX
Seminar presentation Burj Khalifa
PPT
CONCERTE JUMP FORM BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
PDF
Tacoma narrows bridge collapse
PDF
The Shard, Skyscraper - Architectural Case Study
PDF
Reinforced Concrete Ramp Details
PPTX
Structural systems and aerodynamic in multi stoery buildings
PPTX
BURJ AL ARAB
analysis of high rise building
115659118 pre-engineered-buildings
CT3 1c aluminium formwork+
Shear wall
Modular building seminar REPORT 1
Ch 04 Building and Fire Codes
Skyscrapers
Sydney harbour bridge
Taipei 101
Skyscrapers
The taipei 101 tower
earthquake resistant design
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF OUTRIGGER STRUCTURE WITH DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS
Seminar presentation Burj Khalifa
CONCERTE JUMP FORM BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
Tacoma narrows bridge collapse
The Shard, Skyscraper - Architectural Case Study
Reinforced Concrete Ramp Details
Structural systems and aerodynamic in multi stoery buildings
BURJ AL ARAB
Ad

Similar to Doingtherightthing (20)

PDF
Engineering ethics & cases
PPTX
citigroupcenter.pptx
DOCX
Speech Class.docx
PDF
PDF
ENGINEERING_ETHICS_CASE_STUDIES.pdf
PPTX
tall%20bldg%20structures.pptx
PDF
Final Assignment[1]
DOCX
Metropolis workshop
PPT
PPT on High raise Buildings design for PhD
PPT
High-rise Buildings presentation for phd.ppt
PPT
High raise building presentation 2 for phd.ppt
PDF
Chapter 9- ENG 310.pdf ethics of engineering
PPT
Michael Newman presentation
PPT
L5 Vertical Structure Pt 3
PPT
A new standard... test
PPTX
Presentation10.pptx
PDF
Lewis 2011 one_worldtrade
PDF
Download full ebook of Sky Scrapers 1st Edition Lepik Andres instant download...
PDF
Everything has a story
Engineering ethics & cases
citigroupcenter.pptx
Speech Class.docx
ENGINEERING_ETHICS_CASE_STUDIES.pdf
tall%20bldg%20structures.pptx
Final Assignment[1]
Metropolis workshop
PPT on High raise Buildings design for PhD
High-rise Buildings presentation for phd.ppt
High raise building presentation 2 for phd.ppt
Chapter 9- ENG 310.pdf ethics of engineering
Michael Newman presentation
L5 Vertical Structure Pt 3
A new standard... test
Presentation10.pptx
Lewis 2011 one_worldtrade
Download full ebook of Sky Scrapers 1st Edition Lepik Andres instant download...
Everything has a story
Ad

Doingtherightthing

  • 1.  You've taken on a design challenge and come up with a solution that's been widely admired and won you awards. But a year or so later, you realize there was a mistake. There's something horribly wrong with your design. And it's not just something cosmetic — a badly resolved corner etc. — but a fundamental flaw that will almost certainly lead to catastrophic failure. And that failure will result not just in embarrassment, or professional ruin, but death, the death of thousands of people.  You are the only person that knows that something's wrong. What would you do?
  • 2. Doing the Right T hing The Citicorp Center Case William LeMessurier
  • 3.  This sounds like a hypothetical question. But it's not. It's the question that structural engineer William LeMessurier faced on a lonely July weekend about 30 years ago.
  • 4.  Citicorp Center in New York with its distinctive forty-five degree diagonal crown, the Citicorp building is one of the most recognizable skyscrapers on the New York City skyline. With fifty- nine stories, it's the third tallest building in midtown Manhattan, and at the time of its completion it was the seventh-tallest building in the world. At ground level, the huge skyscraper almost seems to hover above Lexington Avenue, held aloft by four massive, 114- foot-tall stilts which are located at the center of each side rather than on the corners. This unusual architecture was one of necessity– the structure had to be built around the landmark St. Peter's Church– but the design left room for a serious engineering flaw which went completely unnoticed during its construction and initial use. Had the weakness not been accidentally discovered and secretly fixed, the mighty skyscraper could have been collapsed by a hard blast of air of wind without any warning.
  • 6.  The building's structural skeleton was designed by an engineer named William J. LeMessurier (pronounced "La Measure") in the early 1970s. Making room for the St. Peter's church was a difficult problem, but LeMessurier was a highly capable and creative engineer. His design called for the building to sit atop nine-story- tall stilts, one centered on each side with a specific geometry in the structure's framing to take maximum advantage of the oddly placed support columns. It also had a single, narrower column in the center which housed the building's elevator banks and provided additional strength to the framing. This design made room for the church under the building's northwest corner, and gave the giant structure a graceful, almost levitating effect.
  • 9. LeMessurier first became aware of the building's weakness in 1978, about a year after its completion. An engineering student contacted him to ask some technical questions about the design, which he was delighted to address. The student's professor had expressed doubts regarding the strength of a stilted skyscraper where the support columns were not on the corners. "Listen, I want you to tell your teacher that he doesn't know what the hell he's talking about," LeMessurier told the student, "because he doesn't know the problem that had to be solved." He went on to explain how the building's framing geometry worked perfectly with the stilts in such positions, allowing it to withstand very forceful winds, even from a diagonal angle.  But the conversation got him thinking, and he started doing some calculations on just how much diagonal wind the structure could withstand. He was particularly interested in the effects of an engineering change made during construction which had seemed caring at the time: numerous joints were secured with bolts rather than welds. Normally such a change was acceptable, but the Citicorp Center's design was unusually sensitive to diagonal winds, which the builders hadn't realized. The results of his calculations were troubling.
  • 11.  He took his calculations to fellow engineer Alan Davenport, who was an expert on the behavior of buildings in high-wind conditions. Davenport found that seventy-mile-per-hour gusts would be sufficient to break the bolts holding the joints, resulting in structural failure. Such winds were not unknown in New York, indeed storms with such strength occurred about once every sixteen years on average. Hurricane season was fast approaching, and now only two men in the world knew that Citicorp's new $175 million tower and its occupants were vulnerable to destruction by catastrophic collapse.
  • 13.  Horrified, LeMessurier fled to his island hideaway on Sebago Lake to refine the findings and consider his options. Because he faced possible litigation, bankruptcy, and professional disgrace he contemplated suicide, but he was struck with the realization that he held the information to initiate extraordinary events which could save thousands of lives. The following day he started making phone calls. After speaking with corporate lawyers and consulting with Leslie Robertson– an engineer who helped design the World Trade Center– LeMessurier went to Cambridge to inform Hugh Stubbins, Jr., the building's architect. Stubbins winced when he heard the news.
  • 15. Together they flew to New York City to confront the executive officers of Citicorp with the dilemma. "I have a real problem for you, sir," LeMessurier said to Citicorp's executive vice-president, John S. Reed. The two men outlined the design flaw and described their proposed solution: to systematically reinforce all 200+ bolted joints by welding two- inch-thick steel plates over them.  Work began immediately, and continued around the clock for three months. Welders worked all night, and carpenters labored during the day. In case of imminent disaster, an evacuation plan was put in place for the surrounding area, but the general public knew nothing of the circumstances… the press was on strike at that time, so news of the repairs did not disseminate to the populace. About halfway into the repairs Hurricane Ella formed, and it appeared to be on a collision course with Manhattan, but fortunately the storm veered out to sea rather than testing the limits of the half-repaired building. The reinforcements were completed in September of 1978, and the entire structure was re- evaluated for safety. Following the repairs, the building was found to be one of the most sturdy skyscrapers in the world. Despite the success, the crisis was kept hidden from the public for almost twenty years, until an article appeared in the New Yorker in 1995.
  • 17.  As for LeMessurier, the executives at Citicorp asked no more than the $2 million his insurance policy covered, despite the fact that the repairs alone cost over $8 million. It is generally thought that his honesty so impressed the executives that they decided to keep their lawyers at bay. It is clear that it takes a lot of character to admit one's own mistakes, but in accepting responsibility for this flaw and then leading the repair effort, the character shown by William J. LeMessurier was nothing short of heroic.
  • 18. Citicorp Center standing over St. Peter's church
  • 19.  The story of William LeMessurier and Citicorp Center was first told in a brilliant New Yorker article by Joe Morgenstern in 1995, "The Fifty-Nine-Story Crisis."