SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Downtown Neighborhood
Transit-Oriented Development Plan




Community Survey
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
October 2011




      Department of
      Planning & Permitting
City and County of Honolulu          Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary




Survey Background 
Survey Purpose
The Department of Planning and Permitting (DPP) of the City and County of Honolulu sought to capture
the perspectives of residents living near the three planned Downtown rail transit stations. National
Research Center, Inc. (NRC) assisted the City in conducting a survey to assess residents’ perceptions
about their neighborhood and opinions about potential transit-oriented development opportunities in
these areas. The results of the survey, combined with other sources of community input, will help the
DPP make plans to guide future public investment and development around the rail stations.

Survey Methods                          

A randomly selected sample of 4,000
households within a half mile of each of the
three proposed stations (Iwilei, Chinatown and
Downtown stations) was mailed the survey.
These 4,000 households were 40% of the total
number of households (10,086) estimated to
be within a half mile of one of the three
proposed stations. Of the 4,000 mailed
surveys, 3,846 were delivered to occupied
households. A total of 1,088 completed
surveys were received (including 20 in
Chinese), for a response rate of 28%; this is a
strong response rate compared to those that
NRC typically sees for surveys in large cities.
The margin of error is plus or minus three
percentage points around any given percent for
the entire sample.

Survey Reports
This executive summary of survey results highlights key findings across the entire Downtown sample. A
full report of survey methods and results, including the survey itself and responses categorized by
location, gender and tenure (whether the resident owns or rents their home), can be found online at:
www.honoluludpp.org/planning.




                                                  1
City and County of Honolulu                  Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary




Survey Findings 
 
Neighborhood Values

Strong connection to place and high value on convenience among Downtown neighbors 

Only about one resident in five intended to move from the home they lived in at the time of the survey
and none of these residents were interested in moving off Oahu. The biggest attractions of the
neighborhood were the convenience of the Downtown location to jobs, transit or shopping. The greatest
annoyances were crime, noise and the expense of housing.

               What 3 things do you like most about living in your neighborhood? 

             Location is close to jobs/bus stops                                         79%

                               Close to shopping                                  66%

                           Housing is affordable                      33%

                    House/property is good size                 20%

       Safe to walk, drive or play (few accidents)              19%

                           Neighborhood is quiet                18%

             Close to recreation areas/facilities              15%

     Neighborhood houses are in good condition                 15%

                       Good schools for children              14%

                                Crime rate is low             12%

    Lively community/interaction with neighbors               11%

                               Restaurants/bars          2%

                                                     %        20%     40%   60%     80%        100%

                                  Total exceeds 100% as respondents chose three items.

Safety, cleanliness and aesthetics also a high priority for residents 

When asked (in an open-ended format) what one thing resident would do to improve their
neighborhood, 25% wanted to address the homeless issue, 20% wanted to reduce crime and increase
safety, 11% wanted to clean up the community and improve its appearance.

Residents value Chinatown and other historic resources in the community 

When asked what neighborhood landmarks or characteristics were most important to preserve,
residents top responses were Chinatown, parks, historic district, buildings and monuments, and
markets and small shops.

                                                                2
City and County of Honolulu                     Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary



Resident Mobility

Most Downtown workers and students used alternative modes to get to work or school 

Nearly two thirds of Downtown residents who work or go to school used alternative modes for their
commute (carpooled, biked or walked to their destination, or they telecommuted). This is undoubtedly
due in part to the fact that 42% of Downtown residents also work or attend school in the area.

                                                        Overall commute mode share 
                                       Drove alone                   Biked
                                                                                      Motorbike or
                                          34%                         1%
                                                                                        scooter
                                                                                          2%
                                                                                           Telecommuted
                                                                                                 4%

                                                                                            Carpooled
                                                                                               8%




                                 Took bus
                                   29%                                            Walked
                                                                                   21%

Travel by bus and on foot rated better than by car and much better than by bicycle 

Walking and bus travel were used more frequently than was bicycling in the Downtown neighborhood,
where most residents felt that the number of bike paths and lanes was poor. Though bus travel and
walking were rated more positively than bicycling as modes of travel, the condition of bus stops and
sidewalks, as well as feelings of safety while waiting for buses or walking, were not viewed so positively.
The condition of local streets, traffic flow and the parking availability were thought to be fair or poor by
two-thirds or more of residents.

Most residents desired improvements to streetscapes on major thoroughfares Downtown 

Every improvement to major Downtown streetscapes (along Nimitz Highway, Dillingham Boulevard and
other major Downtown streets) tested in the survey was widely supported by residents. The greatest
number of residents supported improving sidewalks, adding street lights and expanding bus service. A
smaller number of residents, but still over 80%, supported more on-street parking and bike lanes.

Most Downtown residents were aware of plans to build the transit line and planned to use it 

A majority of residents said they or someone in the household would likely use the planned rail transit
line for shopping, going to entertainment venues, or visiting recreation areas. On the other hand, a
majority of residents did not anticipate using rail transit to get to school or work – likely because their
work or school is in the neighborhood or they neither work nor go to school.




                                                                3
City and County of Honolulu               Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary



Community Amenities

Recreational amenities are valued but could use improvement. 

Only 39% of residents in the Downtown neighborhood used parks a few times a month or more
frequently. While most residents said they felt safe in parks during the day, few felt safe at night or
when homeless people were present. The majority rated park quality as fair or poor, especially for
children and passive park users.

                                 Quality of parks in your neighborhood 
                                 Excellent                 Good             Fair          Poor


                  Quality of parks for playing sports 6%        33%          36%      25%



                     Quality of parks for exercising 7%        27%          39%       27%



            Quality of park playgrounds for children 5%        25%      37%          33%



       Quality of parks for picnicking or hanging out 5% 19%          35%           41%


                                                    %          20%    40%     60%   80%     100%


Senior and youth centers, family entertainment venues less prevalent Downtown  

Senior centers and youth centers were the public amenities least often identified as present in the
neighborhood. The private businesses most prevalent in Downtown were restaurants, grocery stores,
and drug stores; establishments for family entertainment were the least often identified.

Night clubs not admired like other businesses; Affordable housing rated lower than other 
public amenities 

The quality of private businesses and public amenities was generally rated by residents as “good” or
better, with one exception. Uniquely, bars and night clubs were given quality ratings of fair or poor by a
majority of Downtown residents. Libraries, medical clinics, child care and schools were the highest rated
public amenities in the neighborhood, and “affordable housing” was the lowest rated.


Homeless Services
As mentioned previously, homelessness is perceived as a major issue in the Downtown neighborhood.
More than 7 in 10 Downtown residents agreed that existing homeless services and facilities in the
community should remain and that additional ones should be provided. In order of popularity, services
supported include job training, emergency shelter, medical/mental health, transitional shelter,
food/meals, and substance abuse. The most popular locations for locating new homeless services
include Aala Park (11%), Iwilei (6%), Chinatown (6%), and Sand Island (6%).



                                                           4
City and County of Honolulu           Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary



Development Opportunities

Mid rise construction and better landscaping most desired improvements 

New development opportunities will arise with the construction of the proposed rail stations. The vast
majority of residents supported every mentioned possible improvement with the most support given to
improved landscaping, places to sit and bicycle parking. Less support, though still supported by more
than two-thirds of residents, was given to new services like hair salons and dry cleaners, market rate
housing, shopping centers and subsidized housing. A majority of residents supported buildings of 1 to 8
stories near the proposed rail station. As building heights increased from 1-3 stories to more than 30
stories, support dropped off at each height increment until, at over 30 stories of height, 70% of
residents were opposed.

          Support for building the following near your closest proposed rail station 




For more information on the Downtown TOD program and a full report of survey results, please visit
www.honoluludpp.org/planning. This report paid for by the taxpayers of the City & County of Honolulu.



                                                   5

More Related Content

PPTX
Millennial is a State of Mind - Zipcar 2015 Millennial Survey Results
PPTX
Defining the Urban Boomer - Presented by Zipcar
PPTX
Millennials and the American Dream
PPTX
Zipcar & UC Berkeley TSRC Release Findings of 2015 National Transportation Su...
PDF
Lessons from the Green Lane: Evaluating Protected Bike Lane Efforts
PDF
What People Want from Governments
PDF
Feb. 28 Waste Management Daily Progress Report
PDF
Robert Godbey Disclosure
Millennial is a State of Mind - Zipcar 2015 Millennial Survey Results
Defining the Urban Boomer - Presented by Zipcar
Millennials and the American Dream
Zipcar & UC Berkeley TSRC Release Findings of 2015 National Transportation Su...
Lessons from the Green Lane: Evaluating Protected Bike Lane Efforts
What People Want from Governments
Feb. 28 Waste Management Daily Progress Report
Robert Godbey Disclosure

Similar to Downtown exec summary (20)

PDF
Kalihi exec summary
PPTX
Permeability presentation summary
PDF
2012 11-29 presentation
PDF
PLANiTULSA Our Vision Overview & Implementation Pc
PPTX
Nurs 444 community assessment windshield presentation ken meier
PDF
Woodland Park Workshop 1 Results
PDF
Jan Gehl. Liveable Cities for the 21st Century
PDF
The World of Young People Today: Victoria Guyatt, Deputy Head of Ethnography,...
PDF
4 kavkova-ifa
PDF
2 ifa
PDF
Powerpoint Presentation from the Final Green Line Extension Community Visioni...
DOCX
Running Head Windshield Survey1 Windshield Survey.docx
PPT
Dan Burden Federal Reserve Presentation
PPT
Walk/Live Opening Lecture
PDF
FUTUREBR Survey Results
PDF
Lansing Sidewalks August 2012
PDF
Transportation 2040 Presentation for Marpole July 4 2012
PPT
Community Values Workshop Presentation
PPT
Oakland community assessment
PPT
Official Oakland community assessment
Kalihi exec summary
Permeability presentation summary
2012 11-29 presentation
PLANiTULSA Our Vision Overview & Implementation Pc
Nurs 444 community assessment windshield presentation ken meier
Woodland Park Workshop 1 Results
Jan Gehl. Liveable Cities for the 21st Century
The World of Young People Today: Victoria Guyatt, Deputy Head of Ethnography,...
4 kavkova-ifa
2 ifa
Powerpoint Presentation from the Final Green Line Extension Community Visioni...
Running Head Windshield Survey1 Windshield Survey.docx
Dan Burden Federal Reserve Presentation
Walk/Live Opening Lecture
FUTUREBR Survey Results
Lansing Sidewalks August 2012
Transportation 2040 Presentation for Marpole July 4 2012
Community Values Workshop Presentation
Oakland community assessment
Official Oakland community assessment
Ad

More from Honolulu Civil Beat (20)

PDF
Gov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo
PDF
Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...
PDF
Audit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and Controls
PDF
2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD
DOC
Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10
PDF
NHPI COVID-19 Statement
PDF
DLIR Response Language Access
PDF
Language Access Letter To DLIR
PDF
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
PDF
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
PDF
Jane Doe v. Rehab Hospital
PDF
Coronavirus HPHA
PDF
OHA Data Request
PDF
Letter from Palau to Guam
PDF
Guam Governor's Letter to Pence
PDF
OHA Analysis by Akina
PDF
Case COFA Letter
PDF
List Of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers
PDF
Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018
PDF
Caldwell Press Release
Gov. David Ige response to U.S. Rep. Anna Eshoo
Audit of the Department of the Honolulu Prosecuting Attorney’s Policies, Proc...
Audit of the Honolulu Police Department’s Policies, Procedures, and Controls
2019 Use of Force Annual Report HPD
Office of Health Equity Goals Draft 10
NHPI COVID-19 Statement
DLIR Response Language Access
Language Access Letter To DLIR
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
ACLU Letter to HPD regarding racial profiling
Jane Doe v. Rehab Hospital
Coronavirus HPHA
OHA Data Request
Letter from Palau to Guam
Guam Governor's Letter to Pence
OHA Analysis by Akina
Case COFA Letter
List Of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers
Arbitration Hearing Transcript December 2018
Caldwell Press Release
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
PDF
Samaya Jyothi Live News Telugu | Breaking & Trusted Updates
PPTX
Precised New Precis and Composition 2025.pptx
PDF
Conflict, Narrative and Media -An Analysis of News on Israel-Palestine Confli...
PDF
Executive an important link between the legislative and people
PDF
KAL 007 Manual: The Russian Shootdoown of Civilian Plane on 09/01/1983
PDF
Regional Media Representation of Kuki-Meitei Conflict - An Analysis of Peace ...
PDF
2025-07-24_CED-HWB_WIPP_ACO000000001.pdf
PDF
Role of federalism in the indian society
DOC
证书结业SU毕业证,莫道克大学毕业证假学位证
PDF
JUDICIAL_ACTIVISM_CRITICAL_ANALYSIS in india.pdf
PDF
The Blogs_ Hamas’s Deflection Playbook _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Times of Israe...
DOCX
Breaking Now – Latest Live News Updates from GTV News HD
PDF
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
PPTX
Pakistan movement part 2: story about Pakistan Movement
PPTX
ASEANOPOL: The Multinational Police Force
PPTX
Indian ancient knowledge system, ancient geopolitics
PPTX
The-Evolution-of-Public-Human-Resource-Management (1).pptx
DOCX
End Of The Age TV Program: Depicting the Actual Truth in a World of Lies
PDF
The Most Dynamic Lawyer to Watch 2025.pdf
Sir Creek Conflict: History and its importance
Samaya Jyothi Live News Telugu | Breaking & Trusted Updates
Precised New Precis and Composition 2025.pptx
Conflict, Narrative and Media -An Analysis of News on Israel-Palestine Confli...
Executive an important link between the legislative and people
KAL 007 Manual: The Russian Shootdoown of Civilian Plane on 09/01/1983
Regional Media Representation of Kuki-Meitei Conflict - An Analysis of Peace ...
2025-07-24_CED-HWB_WIPP_ACO000000001.pdf
Role of federalism in the indian society
证书结业SU毕业证,莫道克大学毕业证假学位证
JUDICIAL_ACTIVISM_CRITICAL_ANALYSIS in india.pdf
The Blogs_ Hamas’s Deflection Playbook _ Andy Blumenthal _ The Times of Israe...
Breaking Now – Latest Live News Updates from GTV News HD
History ppt on World War 2 and its consequences
Pakistan movement part 2: story about Pakistan Movement
ASEANOPOL: The Multinational Police Force
Indian ancient knowledge system, ancient geopolitics
The-Evolution-of-Public-Human-Resource-Management (1).pptx
End Of The Age TV Program: Depicting the Actual Truth in a World of Lies
The Most Dynamic Lawyer to Watch 2025.pdf

Downtown exec summary

  • 1. Downtown Neighborhood Transit-Oriented Development Plan Community Survey EXECUTIVE SUMMARY October 2011 Department of Planning & Permitting
  • 2. City and County of Honolulu Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary Survey Background  Survey Purpose The Department of Planning and Permitting (DPP) of the City and County of Honolulu sought to capture the perspectives of residents living near the three planned Downtown rail transit stations. National Research Center, Inc. (NRC) assisted the City in conducting a survey to assess residents’ perceptions about their neighborhood and opinions about potential transit-oriented development opportunities in these areas. The results of the survey, combined with other sources of community input, will help the DPP make plans to guide future public investment and development around the rail stations. Survey Methods   A randomly selected sample of 4,000 households within a half mile of each of the three proposed stations (Iwilei, Chinatown and Downtown stations) was mailed the survey. These 4,000 households were 40% of the total number of households (10,086) estimated to be within a half mile of one of the three proposed stations. Of the 4,000 mailed surveys, 3,846 were delivered to occupied households. A total of 1,088 completed surveys were received (including 20 in Chinese), for a response rate of 28%; this is a strong response rate compared to those that NRC typically sees for surveys in large cities. The margin of error is plus or minus three percentage points around any given percent for the entire sample. Survey Reports This executive summary of survey results highlights key findings across the entire Downtown sample. A full report of survey methods and results, including the survey itself and responses categorized by location, gender and tenure (whether the resident owns or rents their home), can be found online at: www.honoluludpp.org/planning. 1
  • 3. City and County of Honolulu Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary Survey Findings    Neighborhood Values Strong connection to place and high value on convenience among Downtown neighbors  Only about one resident in five intended to move from the home they lived in at the time of the survey and none of these residents were interested in moving off Oahu. The biggest attractions of the neighborhood were the convenience of the Downtown location to jobs, transit or shopping. The greatest annoyances were crime, noise and the expense of housing. What 3 things do you like most about living in your neighborhood?  Location is close to jobs/bus stops 79% Close to shopping 66% Housing is affordable 33% House/property is good size 20% Safe to walk, drive or play (few accidents) 19% Neighborhood is quiet 18% Close to recreation areas/facilities 15% Neighborhood houses are in good condition 15% Good schools for children 14% Crime rate is low 12% Lively community/interaction with neighbors 11% Restaurants/bars 2% % 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Total exceeds 100% as respondents chose three items. Safety, cleanliness and aesthetics also a high priority for residents  When asked (in an open-ended format) what one thing resident would do to improve their neighborhood, 25% wanted to address the homeless issue, 20% wanted to reduce crime and increase safety, 11% wanted to clean up the community and improve its appearance. Residents value Chinatown and other historic resources in the community  When asked what neighborhood landmarks or characteristics were most important to preserve, residents top responses were Chinatown, parks, historic district, buildings and monuments, and markets and small shops. 2
  • 4. City and County of Honolulu Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary Resident Mobility Most Downtown workers and students used alternative modes to get to work or school  Nearly two thirds of Downtown residents who work or go to school used alternative modes for their commute (carpooled, biked or walked to their destination, or they telecommuted). This is undoubtedly due in part to the fact that 42% of Downtown residents also work or attend school in the area.                                                         Overall commute mode share  Drove alone Biked Motorbike or 34% 1% scooter 2% Telecommuted 4% Carpooled 8% Took bus 29% Walked 21% Travel by bus and on foot rated better than by car and much better than by bicycle  Walking and bus travel were used more frequently than was bicycling in the Downtown neighborhood, where most residents felt that the number of bike paths and lanes was poor. Though bus travel and walking were rated more positively than bicycling as modes of travel, the condition of bus stops and sidewalks, as well as feelings of safety while waiting for buses or walking, were not viewed so positively. The condition of local streets, traffic flow and the parking availability were thought to be fair or poor by two-thirds or more of residents. Most residents desired improvements to streetscapes on major thoroughfares Downtown  Every improvement to major Downtown streetscapes (along Nimitz Highway, Dillingham Boulevard and other major Downtown streets) tested in the survey was widely supported by residents. The greatest number of residents supported improving sidewalks, adding street lights and expanding bus service. A smaller number of residents, but still over 80%, supported more on-street parking and bike lanes. Most Downtown residents were aware of plans to build the transit line and planned to use it  A majority of residents said they or someone in the household would likely use the planned rail transit line for shopping, going to entertainment venues, or visiting recreation areas. On the other hand, a majority of residents did not anticipate using rail transit to get to school or work – likely because their work or school is in the neighborhood or they neither work nor go to school. 3
  • 5. City and County of Honolulu Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary Community Amenities Recreational amenities are valued but could use improvement.  Only 39% of residents in the Downtown neighborhood used parks a few times a month or more frequently. While most residents said they felt safe in parks during the day, few felt safe at night or when homeless people were present. The majority rated park quality as fair or poor, especially for children and passive park users. Quality of parks in your neighborhood  Excellent Good Fair Poor Quality of parks for playing sports 6% 33% 36% 25% Quality of parks for exercising 7% 27% 39% 27% Quality of park playgrounds for children 5% 25% 37% 33% Quality of parks for picnicking or hanging out 5% 19% 35% 41% % 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Senior and youth centers, family entertainment venues less prevalent Downtown   Senior centers and youth centers were the public amenities least often identified as present in the neighborhood. The private businesses most prevalent in Downtown were restaurants, grocery stores, and drug stores; establishments for family entertainment were the least often identified. Night clubs not admired like other businesses; Affordable housing rated lower than other  public amenities  The quality of private businesses and public amenities was generally rated by residents as “good” or better, with one exception. Uniquely, bars and night clubs were given quality ratings of fair or poor by a majority of Downtown residents. Libraries, medical clinics, child care and schools were the highest rated public amenities in the neighborhood, and “affordable housing” was the lowest rated. Homeless Services As mentioned previously, homelessness is perceived as a major issue in the Downtown neighborhood. More than 7 in 10 Downtown residents agreed that existing homeless services and facilities in the community should remain and that additional ones should be provided. In order of popularity, services supported include job training, emergency shelter, medical/mental health, transitional shelter, food/meals, and substance abuse. The most popular locations for locating new homeless services include Aala Park (11%), Iwilei (6%), Chinatown (6%), and Sand Island (6%). 4
  • 6. City and County of Honolulu Downtown Community Survey – Executive Summary Development Opportunities Mid rise construction and better landscaping most desired improvements  New development opportunities will arise with the construction of the proposed rail stations. The vast majority of residents supported every mentioned possible improvement with the most support given to improved landscaping, places to sit and bicycle parking. Less support, though still supported by more than two-thirds of residents, was given to new services like hair salons and dry cleaners, market rate housing, shopping centers and subsidized housing. A majority of residents supported buildings of 1 to 8 stories near the proposed rail station. As building heights increased from 1-3 stories to more than 30 stories, support dropped off at each height increment until, at over 30 stories of height, 70% of residents were opposed. Support for building the following near your closest proposed rail station  For more information on the Downtown TOD program and a full report of survey results, please visit www.honoluludpp.org/planning. This report paid for by the taxpayers of the City & County of Honolulu. 5