Dynamics Of Wikipedia
Download as PPT, PDF19 likes8,716 views
The presentation discusses the dynamics of Wikipedia, outlining its vision as a free, neutral encyclopedia created collaboratively by volunteers. It covers key topics such as contributor roles, vandalism prevention, conflict resolution, community guidelines, and the importance of maintaining article quality. The presentation emphasizes the decentralized nature of decision-making within Wikipedia and encourages contributions while adhering to established policies and guidelines.
Dynamics Of Wikipedia
- 1. Su-Laine Yeo Vancouver User Experience Group November, 2007 Dynamics of Wikipedia This presentation is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 3.0 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
- 2. Overview How does it all work? Who writes for Wikipedia, and why? How does the site keep vandalism and spam away? What happens when contributors disagree? How does the site keep articles consistent and organized?
- 3. Agenda What is Wikipedia? Contributing: Part I Vandalism and spam Conflict and culture Contributing: Part II Please ask questions along the way!
- 5. Vision A free, neutral encyclopedia that anyone can edit “ Imagine a world in which every single person on the planet is given free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing.” – Wikipedia founder Jimbo Wales
- 6. The global project 253 languages 2 million+ articles in English 5 million articles in languages other than English, accounting for half of all traffic Freely -licensed image, video, and sound files on Wikimedia Commons are used across languages http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/List_of_Wikipedias_by_language_family
- 7. Size of the English Wikipedia http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Size_of_English_Wikipedia_in_August_2007.svg
- 9. Who’s who MediaWiki software Wikimedia Foundation Jimmy (Jimbo) Wales, founder, leader, and benevolent dictator 5.8 million registered accounts for volunteer contributors Lots of edits by unregistered users
- 10. Wikimedia Foundation Runs the servers; hardware costs are 60% of its budget No ads or paid subscribers Annual revenues $1.5 million (June 2006) Fewer than 10 full-time employees Sister projects to Wikipedia: Wiktionary, Wikispecies, Wikiversity, Wikinews…
- 11. Wikipedia statistics Among top 10 most visited websites 70% of traffic is from search engines Cited in over 100 U.S. court rulings http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/29/technology/29wikipedia.html?ex=1327726800&en=92bbe5fe41874778&ei=5090
- 12. Key policies Wikipedia is an encyclopedia; its goals go no further Free content Neutral point of view Attribution to reliable sources
- 13. Most viewed articles Source: http://tools.wikimedia.de/~leon/stats/wikicharts for Sept 07
- 14. Most viewed articles (cont’d)
- 15. Most viewed articles (cont’d)
- 16. Unusual articles Exploding whale Heavy metal umlaut Cosmic latte Anti-Barney humor Five-second rule Passenger train toilets Society for the Prevention of Calling Sleeping Car Porters “George” 0.999...
- 17. Contributing: Part I “ So fix it.” - A Wikipedia saying
- 18. Contributing: Overview Editing a sentence Wikitext Headings Links Bulleted lists Templates Signatures Accounts and privacy
- 19. Get an account Editing with an account is MORE private than editing without one Don’t use your real name You can change your username later You can identify yourself in less permanent ways
- 20. User pages
- 23. Addressing vandalism Automated vandalism reversion (bots) Recent Changes patrol Watchlists Semi-protect heavily-vandalised pages Completely protect high-visibility pages Warn vandals Block repeat offenders
- 25. Reverting
- 28. Blocks
- 29. Administrators ~1400 administrators in English Block and unblock users Semi-protect pages (lock pages from being edited by unregistered and new users) Protect pages (lock pages from being edited) Edit protected pages Delete and undelete page histories
- 30. Addressing spam “ No-follow” on external links Spam blacklist As with vandalism: revert, warn user, block persistent offenders
- 32. Other obviously-bad edits Blatant advertising Copyright violation Libel Hoax Complete bullocks
- 33. Conflict and Culture “ When someone just writes 'f**k, f**k, f**k', we just fix it, laugh and move on. But the difficult social issues are the borderline cases — people who do some good work, but who are also a pain in the neck.” – Jimbo Wales
- 34. Conflict When contributors disagree in good faith, there are procedures for working through disputes. The Wikipedia community has final say on most things … The community is: people who have a history of good contributions and who show up for the debate
- 35. What not to do
- 36. Dispute resolution After being bold: Discuss on the article Talk page and/or the other person’s Talk page Third Opinion Mediation Request for Comment Arbitration Intervention by Jimbo
- 37. Content policies and guidelines What are reliable sources? What is an acceptable External Link? Is company XYZ notable enough for an article? Should the article title be “Giraffe” or “Giraffes”? Is it “program” or “programme”?
- 41. Conduct policies and guidelines Be civil Assume good faith Don’t edit war Write for the enemy Ignore all rules Don’t use Wikipedia for self-promotion
- 42. Corporate advocacy and self-promotion Includes adding excessive links to your own company’s website If in doubt about possible conflict of interest, suggest changes on the article’s Talk page or on one of the noticeboards
- 43. Talk pages
- 45. Dispute resolution principles Focus on how to improve the articles Widen the conflict; ask for third-party viewpoints Don’t wikilawyer Discuss rather than vote
- 47. See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deleted_articles_with_freaky_titles http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Pooky_the_Teddy_Bear
- 50. Controversy is often good Motivates people to improve articles Raises awareness of the need for quality sourcing Leads to inclusion of multiple viewpoints and nuances in articles Builds community
- 51. Problem behaviour Point-of-view pushing; political and nationalist block voting Edit warring Persistent corporate advocacy Fraudulent use of multiple accounts (sockpuppetry)
- 52. Problem behaviour (cont’d) Problem users can be banned from a topic or from all of Wikipedia Bans are difficult to enforce Short supply of neutral people who are patient enough to deal with problematic behaviour “ The takeaway message I'm getting here is ‘only an admin with a hole in his head willingly gets involved in Israel-Palestine articles.’ ” - a Wikipedia administrator
- 53. Controversial Issues Wikipedia’s list of controversial issues Articles involving “biographies of living persons” Children in the news Victims of crime People notable for having medical conditions Overwhelmingly negative biographies
- 54. Biographies of Living Persons rules Consider privacy Negative material has more rigorous inclusion requirements Immediately remove unsourced or poorly sourced negative or controversial material Avoid discussion
- 55. IA for two million articles Few information types : encyclopedia articles, lists, disambiguation pages No essays or how-to articles No point-of-view forking of articles Extensive guidelines on: naming conventions refactoring long articles, merging similar articles use of categories
- 56. IA for two million articles (cont’d) Relatively simple markup Extensive use of templates Constant refactoring
- 57. Templates
- 58. Categories There are guidelines for creating categories Be bold in creating categories Categories are subject to refactoring
- 59. Adding and using categories
- 60. Summary: Conflict and culture Policies and guidelines Culture is oriented towards trust, discussion, and generating consensus Conflict can build community and often leads to better articles Most articles are not controversial. Usually, good-faith edits stick Decentralized management of information architecture
- 61. Contributing: Part II “ I have found working with a bunch of like minded folks on an article or wikiproject when it kicks into top gear one of the most inspiring things, the rapid-fire editing of an article gunning toward FA status as writer's blocks are sequentially blasted out of the way is just amazing to witness via the diffs/hists.” – Wikipedia editor “Casliber”
- 62. Contribute by… Writing about what you’re interested in Improving the writing of others Citing sources Categorizing and organizing articles Translating articles Contributing photographs and artwork Reviewing and commenting on articles Maintenance: removing vandalism, spam, and trivia Helping to resolve disputes
- 63. "We can no longer feel satisfied and happy when we see these (article) numbers going up.... We should continue to turn our attention away from growth and towards quality.“ - Jimbo Wales
- 66. Why contribute? Improve your skills in: Writing Editing Having your work edited Conflict resolution and group dynamics Understanding copyright Wiki technology
- 67. Summary Free encyclopedia written by volunteers Be bold Get an account with a fake name; don’t promote commercial interests Revert, warn, and block vandals and spammers Policies, guidelines, and dispute resolution systems exist for controversial issues Distributed decision-making scales well for information architecture
- 68. The radical project Almost no co-ordination of effort 2% of users (1400 people) make 73.4% of edits 0.7% of users (524 people) make 50% of edits But… people who make very, very few edits write most of Wikipedia’s content … Your earliest edits will probably be your most valuable ones http://www.aaronsw.com/weblog/whowriteswikipedia