Dyslipidemia guidelines

Dyslipidaemia
Sameh Attia, MD
Lecturer of Cardiology
Ain Shams University

Management of dyslipidaemia
ESC 2016
1- Lipid profiling.
2- Assess total CVD risk.
3- Treatment strategies. ( according to 1 & 2 )
4- Life style modifications.
5- Treatment targets.
6- Choice of treatment.
7- Dyslipidaemia in special population.

ESC 2016
1- Lipid profiling ( For Whom & How
?? ).

Lipid Profiling
For Whom ??
1- In subjects with CVD.
2- In clinical conditions associated with
increased risk of CVD and dyslipidemia.
3- For CVD risk stratification.

Recommendations for lipid analyses in
cardiovascular disease risk estimation

Risk modifiers
 For those at intermediate risk, other factors,
including metabolic factors such as :
1- Increased apolipoprotein B (apoB),
2- Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)),
3- Triglycerides (TGs) or
4- High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) or
5- The presence of albuminuria, may improve risk
classiﬁcation.

Recommendations for lipid analyses for
characterization of dyslipidaemias before
treatment

Non-HDL cholesterol
 Non-HDL-C is used as an estimation of the total number
of atherogenic particles in plasma [VLDL +
intermediate-density lipoprotein (IDL) + LDL] .
 Non-HDL-C correlates relates well to apo B levels.
 Non-HDL-C is easily calculated from TC minus HDL-C.

Non-HDL cholesterol
 Non-HDL-C can provide a better risk estimation
compared with LDL-C, in particular in Mixed
dyslipidaemias combined with diabetes, the
Metabolic Syndrome or CKD.
 This is supported by a recent meta-analysis
including 14 statin trials, seven fibrate trials, and
six nicotinic acid trials.

Apolipoproteins
1- Apolipoprotein B.
2- Apolipoprotein A1.

 From a technical point of view, there are
advantages in the determination of apoB and
apoA1.
 The analytical performance is good and the
assays do not require fasting conditions
and are not sensitive to markedly elevated
TG levels

Apolipoprotein B
 Apo B is the major apolipoprotein of the
atherogenic lipoprotein families VLDL, IDL,
and LDL.
 The concentration of apo B is a good
estimate of the number of these particles in
plasma.

Apolipoprotein B
 several post-hoc analyses of statin trials
suggest that apo B may be not only a risk
marker but also a better treatment target than
LDL-C.
 Another Met analysis showed that apo B
does not provide any benefit beyond non-
HDL-C or traditional lipid ratios.
Therefore, Apo B used as Secondary treatment
target.

Apolipoprotein A1
 Apo A1 is the major protein of HDL and
provides a good estimate of HDL
concentration.
 Plasma apo A1 of ˂ 120 mg/dL for men and
˂ 140 mg/dL for women approximately
correspond to what is considered as low for
HDL-C.

Lipoprotein a
 The plasma level of Lp(a) is to a major extent
genetically determined.
 Lp(a) has been found in several studies to be
an additional independent risk marker;
indeed,genetic data show it to be causal in
the pathophysiology of atherosclerotic
vascular disease and aortic stenosis.

Lipoprotein a
 Plasma Lp(a) is not recommended for risk screening in
the general population ;however, Lp(a) measurement
should be systematically considered in people with:
1- High CVD risk.
2- Strong family history of premature atherothrombotic
disease.
3- Correct reclassiﬁcation in patients on the borderline
between high and moderate risk.

Lipoprotein a
 The risk is regarded as signiﬁcant when
Lp(a) is above the 80th percentile (50
mg/dL).

Lipoprotein a
 Reduction of Lp(a) has been shown with several of the
emerging lipid-lowering drugs:
1- Proprotein convertase subtilisin/ kexin type 9 (PCSK9)
inhibitors and nicotinic acid reduce Lp(a) by 30%.
2- Anti sense drugs targeting the Lp(a) gene reduce the
circulating levels of this protein by up to 80%. A reasonable
option for patients at risk with high Lp(a) is an intensiﬁed
treatment of the modiﬁable risk factors, including LDL-C.

ESC 2016
1- Lipid profiling.
3- Treatment strategies (According to 1 & 2)

Life Style modifications
1- Nutrition.
2- Physical exercise.
3- Management of overweight & Obesity.
4- Smoking cessation.
5- Moderation of Alcohol consumption in
Alcoholics.

 Smoking cessation has clear benefits on
the overall CV risk and specifically on HDL-C.

 Aerobic physical activity corresponding to
a total energy expenditure of between 1500
and 2200 kcal/week, such as 25–30 km of
brisk walking per week (or any equivalent
activity) may increase HDL-C levels by 0.08
–0.15 mmol/L (3.1 – 6 mg/dL)

Treatment Targets
For prevention of CVD
( Primary or Secondary Prevention )
1- Primary Treatment targets.
2- Secondary Treatment targets.
3- Not recommended as Treatment targets.

Treatment targets
 Treatment targets of dyslipidaemia are
primarily based on results from clinical trials.
 In nearly all lipid-lowering trials the LDL-C
level has been used as an indicator of
response to therapy.
Therefore, LDL-C remains the primary target of
therapy in most strategies of dyslipidaemia
management.

Treatment targets
 Non-HDL-C and apoB receive a moderate
grading as treatment targets as they have not
been extensively studied in RCTs compared
to LDL-C.
Therefore, Non-HDL-C & Apo B are considered as
Secondary treatment targets for dyslipidaemia
management.

• LDL-C→recommended as target for tx
(class I A)
• TC→considered as tx target if other
analyses are not available (class IIa A)
Primary Treatment Targets

• Non-HDL-C→ considered as a
secondary tx target (class IIa B)
• Apo B→considered as a secondary tx
target (class IIa B)
Secondary Treatment Targets

• HDL-C → not recommended as targets
for tx (class III C) because evidence is
lacking on the efficacy of intervention on
this variable to reduce CVD risk.
• Ratios ( Apo B/ Apo A1 )
( Non- HDL/ HDL )
Not recommended as Treatment Targets

 To date, No speciﬁc goals for HDL-C or TG
levels have been determined because clinical
trial evidence is lacking on the effectiveness
of intervening in these variables to reduce CV
risk further.

• In patients at VERY HIGH CV risk→the LDL-C goal is
<1.8 mmol/L (<~70 mg/dL) and/or ≥50% LDL-C
reduction when target level can not be reached (class I
A)
• In patients at HIGH CV risk→the LDL-C goal <2.5
mmol/L (<~100 mg/dL) should be considered (class IIa
A)
• In patients at MODERATE CV risk→the LDL-C goal
<3.0 mmol/L (<~115 mg/dL) should be considered
(class IIa C)
Treatment Targets for LDL-C

Why ( < 70 mg/dl ) ???????
 Extrapolating from the available data, an
absolute reduction to an LDL-C level less
than 70 mg/dL or at least a 50% relative
reduction in LDL-C provides the best benefit
in terms of CVD reduction.

• If non-HDL-C is used, the targets
should be; <2.6 mmol/L (<~100 mg/dL)
in those at VERY HIGH CV risk
and <3.3 mmol/L (<~130 mg/dL) in those
at HIGH CV risk
(class IIa B)
• If apo B is available, the targets are;
<80 mg/dL in those at VERY HIGH CV
risk and
<100 mg/dL in those at HIGH CV risk
(class IIa B)
Treatment Targets Other Than LDL-C

Choice of lipid-lowering
drugs in the management of
dyslipidaemias

1- Hypercholesetrolaemia.
2- Hypertriglyceridaemia.
3- Mixed dyslipidaemia.

1- Statins.
2- Bile acid sequestrants.
3- Cholesterol absorption inhibitors.
4- PCSK9 inhibitors.
5- Nicotinic acid.
6- Drug combinations:
 Statins + Cholesterol absorption inhibitors.
 Statins + Bile acid sequestrants.
 Others.
Pharmacological
Treatment of Hypercholesterolaemia

• Statin →prescribe up to the highest
recommended dose or highest tolerable
dose to reach the target level
(class I A)
• Statin intolerance→
bile acid sequestrants or
cholesterol absorption inhibitor
alone or in combination ( class IIa )
Pharmacological

• If Target level is not reached→
statin combination with:
 cholesterol absorption inhibitor ( Class II a )
or
 bile acid sequestrants ( Class II b )
Pharmacological

In patients at very high-risk, with
persistent high LDL-C despite
treatment with maximal tolerated
statin dose, in combination with
ezetimibe or in patients with statin
intolerance, a PCSK9 inhibitor may be
considered.
( Class II b )
Pharmacological

Pharmacological
Treatment of
Hypertriglyceridaemia
1- Severe
2- Modest

Definition of
hypertriglyceridaemia
According to the EAS consensus document:
 Mild to moderate HTG is deﬁned as TGs >1.7
mmol/L (150 mg/dL) and <10 mmol/L (880
mg/dL).
 Severe HTG is deﬁned as TGs > 10 mmol/L
( 880 mg/dL).

Severe Hypertriglyceridemia
 Treatment of Severe Hypertiglyceridemia
( > 880mg/dl ) should begin immediately to
reduce risk of pancreatitis & usually fibrate is
tried first.
 Other treatment options include :
1- Lipid lowering therapy.
2- Dietary modifications.
3- Insulin in poorly controlled DM
4- Apheresis.

Modest Hypertriglyceridemia
 Treatment of modest hypertriglyceridemia should begin
with:
1- Assessment of total CVD risk.
3- Search for underlying cause.

After Life style modifications & in
high risk patients:
 If TG remain elevated start statin therapy due to
significant effect on mortality and CV risk lowering
with the primary goal to reach LDL and Non-HDL
cholestrol targets. ( esp. Potent statins; Atorvastatin
& Rosuvastatin )
 Combination therapy with a fibrate should follow if
needed. Also Niacin is another option.

Efficacy of fibrates on CV
outcome
The clinical effects of fibrates are primarily illustrated
by five prospective RCTs:
1- Helsinki Heart Study (HHS),
2- Veterans Affairs Highdensity lipoprotein Intervention
Trial (VA-HIT),
3- Bezafibrate Infarction Prevention (BIP) study,
4- Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes
(FIELD) and
5- Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes
(ACCORD) study, where fenofibrate was added to statin
therapy

 Neither the FIELD nor the ACCORD study showed a
reduction in total CVD outcomes.
 Results from other meta-analyses suggest reduced major
CVD events in patients with high TGs and low HDL-C in
fibrate-treated patients, but no decrease in CVD or total
mortality.
 Thus the overall efficacy of fibrates on CVD
outcomes is much less evident than that of
statins.
Overall, the possible benefits of fibrates require confirmation.

Drugs for Low HDL-C
 Low HDL-C constitute a strong, independent
and inverse predictor of the risk of premature
development of atherosclerosis.

Drugs for Low HDL-C
1- statins.
2- Fibrates.
3- Nicotinic acid.
4- CETP inhibitors

 However, there is until now No clear direct evidence that
raising HDL-C really results in CVD prevention.
 This is being tested in:
Nicotinic acid:
HPS2-THRIVE
AIM-HIGH
CETP inhibitors:
Dalcetrapib Outcomes (dal-OUTCOMES).
Randomized Evaluation of the Effects of Anacetrapib Through
Lipidmodification (REVEAL)

Pharmacological
Treatment of Mixed
Dyslipidaemia

• ↑ in HDL-C and ↓ in TG on top of ↓ in LDL-C
can be achieved by statins.
• Statin+fibrate→monitor for myopathy;
combination with gemfibrozil should be
avoided
• TG are not controlled by statins or
fibrates→n-3 fatty acids
Drug Combinations for the
Management of Mixed
Dyslipidaemias

ESC 2016
1- Lipid profiling.
7- Dyslipidaemia in special
population.

Management of Dyslipidaemias
in Different Clinical Settings
 Familial dyslipidaemias
 Children
 Women
 The elderly
 Metabolic syndrome and diabetes mellitus
 Patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention
 Heart failure and valvular disease
 Autoimmune diseases
 Renal disease
 Transplantation patients
 Peripheral arterial disease
 Stroke
 Human immunodeficiency virus patients

Familial Hypercholesterolemia
 FH is suspected in subjects with:
 CVD aged <55 years (♂) or <60 years (♀),
 Relatives with premature CVD
 known FH in the family.
 Subjects with severe elevation of LDL-C ( > 190 mg/dl
in adults and > 150 mg/dl in children ).
 ( Class I c )
 Confirm the diagnosis with clinical criteria or with DNA
analysis. ( Class I c )

 Family screening is indicated when a patient with HeFH
is diagnosed. ( Class I c )

Dutch Lipid Clinic Network diagnostic criteria for familial
hypercholesterolaemia

Heterozygous Type:
1- AcoD type ( Defect in LDL receptor )
2- AD type ( Gain of function mutation of PCSK
9 )
3- AR type ( Mutation of ARH gene 
decrease recycling of LDL-R )
4- Familial defective Apo B100 (decrease
affinity to LDL-R )

Heterozygous Type:
Treatment :
Intense dose statins ( often in cimbination with ezetimibe ).
( Class I )
Treatment with a PCSK9 antibody should be considered in FH
patients with:
 CVD or
 With other factors putting them at very high-risk for CHD, such
as other CV risk factors, family history, high Lp(a) or
 Statin intolerance
( Class IIa )

Heterozygous Type:
Targets:
Treatment should be considered to aim at reaching an
LDL-C <2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) or in the presence of
CVD <1.8 mmol/L (70 mg/dL). If targets cannot be
reached, maximal reduction of LDL-C should be
considered using appropriate drug combinations

Heterozygous Type: ( Children )
Children with FH should be educated to adopt a
1- Proper diet and
2- Treated with statin from 8–10 years of
age. Targets for treatment should be LDL-C
<3.5 mmol/L (135 mg/dL) at >10 years of
age )and at younger ages at least a 50%
reduction of LDL-C.

Homozygous Type ( Rare )
 Both Parents had HeFH
 Failure of LDL-R expression severe increase of LDL
with death in early adulthood due to Myocardial ischemia
or AS.
 Treatment:
High dose statins + combination therapy
LDL apharesis
CABG usually at young age
Novel ttt ( Antisense RNA against Apo B synthesis in liver )

Children
 Only in FH consideration should be given to
lipid-lowering drug treatment.
 In other cases of dyslipidaemia in children,
focus should be on diet and treatment of
underlying metabolic disorders.

When to start Statin therapy ??
 The exact age at which to start statin treatment
is, however, a matter for clinical judgement.
 HoFH patients should be treated with lipid-
lowering drugs as early as possible, and the
same is true for HeFH patients with extremely
high LDL-C, i.e. ≥400 mg/dL (10.3 mmol/L).
 In the case of other HeFH children,statin
treatment is generally with held until sometime
between the ages of 8 and 10 years.

Women
 Statin tx→recommended for
primary prevention of CAD in
high risk women
 Statins→recommended for
secondary prevention in
women with the same
indications and targets as in
men

Women
 Lipid-lowering drugs should not be given when
pregnancy is planned, during pregnancy or
during the breast-feeding period
Bile acid sequestrants (which are not absorbed)
may be considered.

The Elderly
 Tx with statins→recommended for elderly
patients with established CVD in the same
way as for younger patients (class I B)
 Elderly people often have comorbidities
and have altered pharmacokinetics
 Recommended to start lipid-lowering
medication at a low dose and then
titrate with caution to achieve target
lipid levels which are the same as in the
younger subjects (class I C)

DM & dyslipidemia
 Patterns of dyslipidemia in DM.
T1DM: Serum TGs ( Normal )
HDL ( Upper normal or slightly
elevated )
Due to Insulin therapy -> increase lipoprotein
lipase activity in adipose tissue -> Increase
turn over of VLDL ( TRLs )
Increased CV risk is due to Qualitative
changes in LDL & HDL i.e. become
atherogenic.

T1DM
 In patients with T1DM and in presence of
microalbuminuria &/or renal disease LDL-C
lowering ( at least 50% ) with statins as the
first choice is recommended irrespective of
base line LDL-C level.
Class I
( drug combination may be used if required )

DM & dyslipidemia
T2DM: ( Mixed dyslipidemia )
 Moderate increase of TGs.
 Increase of TRLs including LDL & VLDL.
 Decrease of HDL & Apo A.
Due to Insulin resistance  flux of FFA to
liver  Non- alcoholic fatty liver disease 
increase content of liver fat  Increase VLDL
& TGs

CVD risk assessment in DM
 ESC 2013/2016:
Very high risk: DM + other CVD risk factors
or TOD
High risk: DM

T2DM
Manag. ???
 Life style modifications
 Statins are recommended irrespective of
baseline LDL-C ( target acc. To level of risk )
High or very high risk
( drug combination may be used if required )

CKD & Dyslipidemia
 Pattern of dyslipidemia in CKD:
Mixed dyslipidemia
1- Increased TGs ( due to increased production & impaired
turn over of TRLs ).
2- Decreased HDL-C.
3- Increased LDL-C ( due to prolonged catabolic rate of
LDL-C )

 Based on results of different RCTs &
meta-analyses:
In patients with CKD not on dialysis: treatment with
statins reduced all-cause mortality by 34%, CV
mortality by 31%,CV events by 45% and stroke by
34%.
In patients receiving dialysis: treatment with
statins had no effect on all-cause mortality and no
convincing evidence of reduced CVD events.,

Patients with ACS & patients
undergoing PCI
It was shown that either pretreatment
with high-dose statin (ranging from > 2 weeks
to a single dose) in patients not on statin
therapy (11studies) or loading of a high-dose
statin in patients receiving chronic statin
therapy decreased peri-procedural MI and
30-day adverse events in patients
undergoing PCI.

Routine short pretreatment or loading (on the
background of chronic therapy) with high-dose
statins before PCI should be considered in
elective PCI or in NSTE-ACS.
Class II a

Heart Failure and Valvular Diseases
 n-3 PUFAs (1 g/day)→to be added
to optimal tx in patients with HF
( Class IIb B )
 Cholesterol-lowering therapy by
statins→not indicated in patients
with moderate to severe HF (NYHA
III-IV) CORONA GISSI-HF
 ( Class III A )
 Lipid-lowering tx→not indicated in
patients with valvular disease
without CAD ( Class III B )

Peripheral Arterial Disease
 PAD is a high risk condition and
lipid-lowering therapy (mostly
statins) is recommended
( Class I A )
 Statins→recommended to
reduce the progression of carotid
atherosclerosis ( Class I A )

Autoimmune disease & Dyslipidemia
 Rheumatoid arthritis, SLE, psoriasis and anti-
phospholipid syndrome, are characterized by enhanced
atherosclerosis and consequently higher CV morbidity
and mortality rates compared with the general
population.
 Statins are effective in reducing disease activity, CV
events and mortality (particularly in primary prevention)
in this setting However,there is no ﬁrm indication to use
lipid-lowering therapy only on the basis of the presence
of the disease.

ACC 2013
Guidelines for LDL-C lowering for
prevention of ASCVD

There are 4 defined Statin
Benefit groups
1- Patients with clinical ASCVD.
2- LDL greater than 190 mg/dl.
3- Patients with diabetes, age 40-75 years.
4- Age 40-75 years that do not meet above
criteria, but have a 10 year risk of >7.5 %
( according to the New pooled cohort risk equation )

Q: why 4 major statin benefit
groups ???
 Because Statins RCTs showed the greatest
ASCVD event reduction that EXCEEDS risk
of adverse events.

There are 4 defined Statin Benefit
groups
 All of these are indicated for statin treatment
 Results are mainly derived from CTT
metanalyses which showed that each 39
mg/dl reduction in LDL-C with statins
Reduction of ASCVD events by 22%

1. Patients with clinical
ASCVD
 Coronary artery disease or peripheral artery
disease
 Acute coronary syndromes
 Coronary or other arterial revascularization
 Stroke or TIA
 These patients get high intensity statin treatment
If they cannot tolerate high intensity statin therapy, use
other agent to achieve >50% reduction of baseline LDL.

2. LDL greater than 190 mg/dl
 These are patients with familial hyperlipidema
( we should exclude secondary causes first to
avoid unnecessary use of statins )
 These patients get high intensity statin treatment
If they cannot tolerate high intensity statin therapy, use
other agent to achieve >50% reduction of baseline LDL.

3. Patients with diabetes, age 40-75
years
All have indication for statin
 Level of intensity of statin treatment depends
on calculated 10 year risk.
 Diabetics with > 7.5% 10 year risk get high
intensity statin therapy
 Diabetics with < 7.5% 10 year risk of CAD
get moderate intensity statin therapy

4. Age 40-75 years that do not meet above
criteria, but have a 10 year risk of >7.5 %
 10 year and lifetime risk as determined by CV
Risk Calculator.
 Moderate to high intensity statin therapy
recommended

In these individuals whose 10 year risk is less
that 7.5%, or when the decision is unclear,
other factors should be considered
 Family history of premature CAD
 LDL > 160 mg/dl
 Increased CRP greater than 2.0
 Coronary calcium greater than 300
 ABI < 0.9

There are no longer treatment targets
for LDL or non-HDL
 This is a huge change for patients and
providers.
 No longer treat to target
 Goal is no longer “lower is better.”

Q: Why no longer treatment
targets ???
 No RCTs compare 2 LDL-C or Non-HDL-C
targets.
 No RCTs had evaluated titration of all
individuals in treatment group to specific
LDL-C targets to ˂ 100 mg/dl or ˂ 70 mg/dl.
 Potential adverse effects from multidrug
therpy to achieve a specific goal.

Remember that this classification done
ONLY to monitor therapeutic response BUT
NOT cosidered as Treatment TARGETS

Insufficient response to statins
1- Assess adherence to medications & life style
modifications.
2- Exclude Secondary causes of
Hyperlipidemia.
3- Intolerance to Statins.

Non-statin therapies
 For hyperlipidemia, non statin therapies, alone or in combination
with statins, do not provide acceptable risk reduction benefits
compared to adverse effects. CLASS IIb
 For the most part, these should be avoided
with few exceptions when risk reduction outweigh the potential
adverse events.

Why don’t non-statins play a
more prominent role in the new
guidelines?

Recent troublesome non-Statin Trials
 Fibrate
 ACCORD.
 FIELD.
( Fenofibrate showed no reduction of CV death &
NFMI ) but in subgroup analysis in pts with
elevated TGs and Low HDL it showed reduction
of CV risk.

Troublesome non-Statin Trials
 Niacin
 HPS2-THRIVE (Treatment of HDL to reduce the
Incidence of Vascular Events ).
 AIM-HIGH

Statins
 Mech. of action ( HMG CoA reductase inhibitors ).
 Actions:
decrease LDL ( 20 – 60% )
decrease TGs ( 10 – 25 % )
Increase HDL ( 5 – 15 % )
Pleiotropic actions of statins
 Side effects:
Myopathy ( least with Pra- & Flu- ) / Rhabdomyolysis
Liver function abnormalities ( least with Pra- & Sim- )
GIT disturbances, Fatigue, Myalgia

Trials of Statins
 For Primary prevention:
ASCOT ( Ator- ) JUPITER ( Rosu-) HPS ( Simv- )
 For Secondary prevention:
CARE ( Prav- )
 In ACS:
MIRACLE ( Ator- ) PROVE IT ( Ator- vs Prav- )
 Atherosclerosis regression :
REVERSAL ( Ator- vs Prav- ) ASTEROID ( Rosuv- )

Non- statin therapy
Fibrates
Mech. : Agonists of PPAR- α  regulate gene expression
 ++ LPL activity  ++ lipolysis of TGLs
Action: Decrease TGs ( 20 – 50% ) & LDL ( 5 – 20% )
Side effects: Myopathy , GIT disturbances, Erectile
dysfunction
Trials: FIELD & ACCORD ( Fenofibrate showed no
reduction of CV death & NFMI ) but in subgroup analysis
in pts with elevated TGs and Low HDL it showed
reduction of CV risk.

Niacin
Mech. : Decrease hepatic secretion of VLDL from liver and
FFAs mobilization from periphery.
Action: Decrease TGs ( 20 – 25% ) & LDL ( 5 – 20% )
Increase HDL ( 15 – 35 % )
Side effects: Flushing , GIT disturbances, Hyperuricemia,
Hepatotoxicity….
Trials: HPS2 – THRIVE & AIM HIGH ( Adding Niacin to
statins showed no significant reduction of CV events )

Cholestrol Absorption Inhibitors
Mech. : Decrease selective uptake of cholestrol by
intestinal epithelial cells. ( inhibit NPC1- like protein )
Action: Decrease LDL ( 18% ).
Side effects: Increase Liver Transaminases
Trials:
SEAS ( Ezetimibe + Simv. ) in AS  Decrease CV events
but not decreasing progression of AS.

IMPROVE-IT
 Ezetimibe was added to simvastatin (40 mg) in patients after ACS.
A total of 18144 patients were randomized:
 170 fewer events were recorded in the group taking simvastatin plus
ezetimibe (P = 0.016).
 The average LDL-C during the study was 1.8 mmol/L in the simvastatin
group and 1.4 mmol/L in patients taking ezetimibe plus simvastatin.
 Also, ischaemic stroke was reduced by 21% in this trial (P = 0.008).
 There was no evidence of harm caused by the further LDL-C reduction.
the study supports the proposition that LDL-C lowering by means other
than statins is beneﬁcial and can be performed without adverse effects.

Bile Acid Binding Resins
Mech. : Interrupt enterohepatic circulation of Bile acids by
inhibiting their reabsorption in intestine  lost in feaces
 plasma cholestrol used in synthesis of Bile acids by
liver.
Action: Decrease LDL ( 15 - 30% ).
Side effects: Constipation, GIT disturbances
Hypertriglyceridemia ( ++ phosphatidic acid
phosphatase leading to increased TG synthesis )

CETP inhibitors
Torcetrapib : Toxic ( ILLUMINATE )
Anacetrapib ( REVEAL )
Dalcetrapib ( DAL-OUTCOME )

PCSK 9 inhibitor
Mech. : Inhibit PCSK ( Proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9
) that functions in internalization & cellular processing of
LDL-R.
Trials :
DESCARTES ( Evolocumab 420 mg once every 4 weeks 
significant reduction of Cholestrol regardless of type of lipid
lowering drugs )
LAPLACE- 2
PCSK9 Inhibitor is not a substitute of statin but only used as
add on ttt or in cases of mixed or resistant hyperlipidemias

Types of Lipoprotein disorders
1- Primary ( Genetic ) disorders
2- Secondary disorders.

Primary Lipoprotein disorders
Two Types of classification
Fridricksin & Leavy classification
Type I: Familial Hyperchlomicronemia
Type II: Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Type III: Dysbetalipoproteinemia
Type IV: Familial Hypertriglyceredemia
Type V: ( Type I + Type IV )
Type VI: Familial combined
hyperlipidemia
Acc. to type of lipoprotein
1- LDL-C
2- TRLs
3- HDL-C

Lipoprotein disorders
Fridricksin & Leavy classification
Type Abnormality Changes
I: Familial
Hyperchylomicronemia
Absent or deficient LPL
or Apo CII ( LPL + )
TGs > 1000
mg/dl
II: Familial
Hypercholesterolemia
LDL
III:
Dysbetalipoproteinemia
Abnormal Apo E
Decrease hepatic
clearance of chylomicron
remnants & IDL
TG & TC
IV: Familial
Hypertriglyceredemia
Overproduction &/or
decreased catabolism of
TGs
TGs
LDL & HDL
V: I + IV Overproduction &/or
decreased catabolism of
chylomicrons & VLDL
TGs
VI: Familial combined
Hyperlipidemia
Overproduction of VLDL.
flux of FFA to liver
LDL & TGs

Type I & Type IV
 Rare.
 The most common complication is
pancreatitis.
 Commonly don’t cause Atherosclerotic
cardiovascular disease or increase
cardiovascular risk.

Type III
 AR disorder.
 Majority are homozygous for Apo E2 with
defective binding to LDL receptors.
 Usually doesn’t cause a problem except if
associated with other lipid disorders as in
DM, Obesity or Metabolic syndrome.

Type IV and VI
 AD
 Mechanism is not clearly understood
however it is mostly due to overproduction
&/or decreased catabolism of affected
lipoproteins.

LDL-C disorders
( Primary & Secondary )
 Familial Hypercholesterolemia
 Dysbetalipoproteinemia
 Familial combined hyperlipidemia
 Hypobetalipoproteinemia
( Due to defective Apo B )
 Abetalipoproteinemia
( Due to Absent Apo B )
Don’t forget Secondary causes

TRLs disorders
( Primary & Secondary )
 Familial Hyperchylomicronemia
 Familial Hypertriglyceredemia
 Familial combined Hyperlipidemia
Don’t forget Secondary causes

HDL Disorders
 Primary ( Genetic ) HDL dyslipidemia
1- Apo A1 defects.
2- LCAT deficiency
3- Tangier disease
4- Niemann-Pick type C disease
5- CETP deficiency
 Part of other familial dyslipidemia ( Type I, IV,
VI )

Secondary causes of Lipoprotein
disorders ( 4D )
LDL- C TGs
Diet Sat. fat
Trans. Fat
Weight gain
Very low fat diet
Excess alcohol/ CHO
Weight gain
Drugs Diuretics
Glucocorticoids
Amiodarone
Thiazides
BBs ( except Carvidelol )
Glucocorticoids
Oral estrogen
BAS.
Diseases Biliary obstruction
Nephrotic syndrome
CRF
Nephrotic syndrome
Disorders & altered
metabolism
Hypothroidism
Obesity
Pregnancy
T2DM ( poorly controlled )

Dyslipidemia guidelines

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Dyslipidemia guidelines (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Dyslipidemia guidelines