OPTIMIZED DYNAMIC OUTDOOR/INDOOR
ARCHERY EMULATION TRAINING SYSTEM
Team Members:
Waldo, Guillermo;
Alvarado, Luigi;
Gonzalez, Jose
Collaborator: William Purpura;
Advisor: PhD. Nina Robson
May 10, 2016
California State University, Fullerton
Department of Mechanical Engineering
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION & MISSION STATEMENT
2. REQUIREMENTS & DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
3. EVOLUTION OF EMULATION STAND DESIGN
4. PROJECT SCHEDULE
5. PRINCIPAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
6. ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST ANALYSIS
7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
8. DESIGN VALIDATION
INTRODUCTION & MISSION STATEMENT
Last year’s team Mission Statement:
• To simulate a long shooting distance (up 90 M) within indoor range space
(18M) to validate emulation methodology & algorithms with proof of concept
• Designed a model that could emulate different ranges based on an algorithm.
This Years Mission Statement (produceability & affordability):
• Design shippable, transportable, lower weight/cost & easily assembled stand
that addresses identified issues with last years final prototypes
REQUIREMENTS
& DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS
Requirements (Carried over from pervious year):
• Emulate 18-90m shooting distances
• Collapsible & Portable
• Utilized scaled emulation target faces
Design Specifications/goals:
• Manufacturability: Cost-Effective, simple design, easy to maintain.
• Affordability: Competitive sale price, minimum storage space & weight.
• Transportability: Fit to standard shipping, resistant packaging, and lightweight.
• User-Friendly: Easy of setup and, easy to move around, simple to repair.
• Operational Safety: Minimize hazards, maximize structure factor of safety.
First team goal: prove concept, our goal: make cost effective
X
122 cm
50 M at 18 M
122 cm
60 M at 18 M
X
X
122 cm
70 M at 18 M
EVOLUTION OF EMULATION STAND DESIGN
• Design approach evolved from original stand R&D efforts to
increasingly higher fidelity deign solutions over two team life span
Design evolution critical to developing optimized design solution
Team 1 Phase 2014-2015
Team 2Phase 2015-2016
Team 1 interim Phase summer 2015
PROJECT SCHEDULE
201
5
201
6
All key schedule milestones were met
PRINCIPAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS
Top Case:
• Shelving units with two pulleys on top shelf
Target Cage:
• Cage frame developed from shelving units
• Maintains stability during operation by 8 wheels
on each corner guided by the main frame corner
columns
Bottom Cage:
• Four wheels mounted at the bottom of the cage
for mobility
• Particle board where Target Cage sits
Motor:
• Winch motor used along with pulleys to drive
target cage position
Design & Analysis performed utilizing SolidWorks
CRITICAL ANALYSIS AREA
• Buckling of support stands
• Tipping Angle of fully erected stand
• Deflection (Induced by Tension of
Target Cage) resulting in biding &
resulting destruction by winch
• Ability to fit into max UPS& FedEx
shipping limits:
Weight: 150 lbs (70 kg).
Packages: 165 inches (length and
girth combined)
Packages: 108 inches in length.
• Use of SolidWorks Key to success
Failure to solve any key issue would have doomed design
ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST ANALYSIS
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 50 100 150 200 250
TotalProductionCostin($)
Units
Production Savings USD for Bulk Quantities
Means In Stock Stock/Make Online Online/Make
Abbrv S SM O OM
$$$ / Category $167.74 $13.21 $399.43 $30.00
Qty Total 118 8 12 1
%Qty Total 84.89% 5.76% 8.63% 0.72%
%Price Total 27.48% 2.16% 65.44% 4.92%
Relative Percentages
MLB 13:43 Fri April 06, 2016
Lv Part Name UPC/ SKU Description Weight Means Qty Weight Price Savings
Lbs
O Archery Stand Emulator Product 1 366.9 $854.18 $-
Retail $
1 Stand Mount 132 163.3 $351.59 $351.59
2 Uprights 7 ft P7 Vertical Mount support 3.03 S 8 24.24 41.36 41.36
2 2x Rivet Beam 18 in DR18 Bracket Short Sides 1.29 S 20 25.8 25.2 25.2
2 2x Rivet Beam 60 in DR60 Bracket Long Front/Back 4.32 S 8 34.56 42.32 42.32
2 Particle Board PB6018 Shelf Surface 60*18in 8.19 SM 3 24.57 19.29 19.29
2 Mobile Base MB6024* Base Support with Caster 35.00 S 1 35 78.52 78.52
2 5990K138 Winch 13.80 S 1 13.8 50 50
2 Pulley 2.21577E+11 Pulley for target 1.00 O 2 2 21.6 21.6
Guide Pulley PVC pipe for Winch guide 2.02 S 1 2.02 5.95 5.95
2 Screws for Pulley Screws Pulley 0.02 S 4 0.08 0.48 0.48
Nuts Pulley Nuts for Pulley 0.02 S 8 0.16
2 Guide Casters Vertical Run Casters 0.02 S 4 0.08 10.08 10.08
2 Unite Bracket To unite Stand-units 0.01 S 2 0.02 1 1
2 Bolts Assembly For Shelve Boards 0.02 S 12 0.24
2 Nuts Assemb For Shelve Boards 0.01 S 12 0.12
2 Split Lock Washer For Shelve Boards 0.01 S 12 0.06
22 Washer Assem For Shelve Boards 0.02 S 24 0.48
2 Zip Ties 748726 To hold Rivet Beams 0.01 S 1 0.01 19.97 19.97
2 3/8 Round Dowel 216112 Shim Boards (Vary size) 0.01 S 9 0.09 35.82 35.82
1 Cage Mount 49 202.6 $496.64 $496.64
2 Uprights 56 in P5* Vertical Mount support 2.28 S 4 9.12 14.84 14.84
2 Rivet Beam 54 DR60* Bracket Long Front/Back 3.90 S 3 11.7 15.87 15.87
2 Rivet Beam 14.64 in DR15* Bracket Short Sides 1.06 S 4 4.24 4.4 4.4
Window Spring PL 14624 Target Stability Assist 0.03 O 8 0.24 3.2 3.2
2 FairLead W116 Guidng system for winch 1.00 O 1 1 20 20
2 Foam Taget Holder 66.08 OM 1 66.08 30 30
2 Target AR-152XF Actual Target 75.00 O 1 75 368.226 368.226
2 Bolts For cage rivet beams 0.04 S 4 0.16 0.8 0.8
2 Nuts For cage rivet beams 0.01 S 8 0.04 0.64 0.64
2 Washers For cage rivet beams 0.00 S 8 0.0008 0.8 0.8
3 Steel Plate Base Rnfcmt Support 5.00 SM 5 25 33.9 33.9
3 Lumber Support 845000 2"x"4x6' 5.00 S 2 10 3.96 3.96
Accessories 1 1.0 $5.95 $5.95
1 Rubber Mallet DBM-15 To rivet shelves in place 1.00 S 1 1 5.95 5.95
1 Cord Motor to Motor 0.50 S
1 Extension Cord Motor to Wall 2.90 S
Dynamic Archery Stand Emulator
Bill of Materials
Cost goals met: reduced cost by 60% over last design
RESULTS & DISCUSSION
Design Objectives:
• Manufacturability: Design was composed of off
the shelve components. Final design dimensions
fit standard shelving unit dimensions.
• Affordability: Cost was reduced by %60. Weight
was reduced to 150lbs (w/out target foam)
• Transportability: Final Dimensions: Assembled:
5’x2’x14’; Disassembled: 8”x27”x14”, Weight: just
under 150lbs
• User-Friendly: Shelving units: Easy to
Assemble/Disassemble and light weight, No
special tooling to build stand; Simple to
• Operational Safety: Overall Structure: Strong and
Stable
Ultimate goal: Design for produceability & affordability
2016 SENIOR ARCHERY DESIGN VALIDATION
Digital design replicated with 100% in working prototype.

More Related Content

PDF
Acople zapex zn
PDF
Still r70 60 diesel fork truck service repair manual
PDF
1 d%20engine%20mechanical%2045 73
PDF
Total chain solutions - diamond cutting chains & accessories for cutting pip...
PDF
Gear wrench xl modular tool system
PDF
610902026P
PDF
Still diesel fork truck forklift r70 16 compact series service repair manual
PDF
Still forklift r70 60 series service repair manual
Acople zapex zn
Still r70 60 diesel fork truck service repair manual
1 d%20engine%20mechanical%2045 73
Total chain solutions - diamond cutting chains & accessories for cutting pip...
Gear wrench xl modular tool system
610902026P
Still diesel fork truck forklift r70 16 compact series service repair manual
Still forklift r70 60 series service repair manual

Viewers also liked (14)

PPTX
Arnis I-Emerald
PPTX
PPTX
Table tennis
PPTX
Pe (arnis 7)
PDF
Table tennis lesson
PPT
Striking techniques
PPT
Table Tennis Overview
PPTX
Physical Education Lesson Plan
PPTX
Arnis (DUAL SPORTS) - Grade 7
DOCX
A detailed lesson plan in p
PDF
K TO 12 GRADE 7 LEARNING MODULE IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION (Q3-Q4)
PDF
K to 12 - Grade 7 Physical Education
PPTX
Arnis ppt
Arnis I-Emerald
Table tennis
Pe (arnis 7)
Table tennis lesson
Striking techniques
Table Tennis Overview
Physical Education Lesson Plan
Arnis (DUAL SPORTS) - Grade 7
A detailed lesson plan in p
K TO 12 GRADE 7 LEARNING MODULE IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION (Q3-Q4)
K to 12 - Grade 7 Physical Education
Arnis ppt
Ad

Similar to ECS Design Project Presentation (20)

PPTX
SCCUR Presentation 2015
PPTX
Trapped With A Kupholder Verify
PDF
Portfolio
PDF
6 Sigma Catapult Project
PPT
QTI_Mechanical Design
PDF
Design and Development of Dynamo Testing Machine
PDF
Commercialization of Robotic Prototypes: Improving the Concept for Manufactur...
PDF
AVERMARK AUTOMATION PVT. LTD.
PDF
8.19.15_Jakes Portfolio_Compressed
PPTX
Vsm and wip with arena simulation
PDF
Navitas Hpdc Dies (0412)
PDF
Best practices for optimizing performance and reducing costs when selecting a...
DOC
B.Agasthian July16
PPT
PROCESS PLANNING for metal cutting 1.ppt
PDF
Ag25181192
PDF
Starfire Engineering Shop Engineering Capabilities
PPT
Presentation_12_5_05.ppt
PPT
Team Power Point
DOC
Jeff Chang resume - 2015
PPTX
Designing Robots for the FIRST Robotics Competition
SCCUR Presentation 2015
Trapped With A Kupholder Verify
Portfolio
6 Sigma Catapult Project
QTI_Mechanical Design
Design and Development of Dynamo Testing Machine
Commercialization of Robotic Prototypes: Improving the Concept for Manufactur...
AVERMARK AUTOMATION PVT. LTD.
8.19.15_Jakes Portfolio_Compressed
Vsm and wip with arena simulation
Navitas Hpdc Dies (0412)
Best practices for optimizing performance and reducing costs when selecting a...
B.Agasthian July16
PROCESS PLANNING for metal cutting 1.ppt
Ag25181192
Starfire Engineering Shop Engineering Capabilities
Presentation_12_5_05.ppt
Team Power Point
Jeff Chang resume - 2015
Designing Robots for the FIRST Robotics Competition
Ad

ECS Design Project Presentation

  • 1. OPTIMIZED DYNAMIC OUTDOOR/INDOOR ARCHERY EMULATION TRAINING SYSTEM Team Members: Waldo, Guillermo; Alvarado, Luigi; Gonzalez, Jose Collaborator: William Purpura; Advisor: PhD. Nina Robson May 10, 2016 California State University, Fullerton Department of Mechanical Engineering
  • 2. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION & MISSION STATEMENT 2. REQUIREMENTS & DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS 3. EVOLUTION OF EMULATION STAND DESIGN 4. PROJECT SCHEDULE 5. PRINCIPAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS 6. ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST ANALYSIS 7. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 8. DESIGN VALIDATION
  • 3. INTRODUCTION & MISSION STATEMENT Last year’s team Mission Statement: • To simulate a long shooting distance (up 90 M) within indoor range space (18M) to validate emulation methodology & algorithms with proof of concept • Designed a model that could emulate different ranges based on an algorithm. This Years Mission Statement (produceability & affordability): • Design shippable, transportable, lower weight/cost & easily assembled stand that addresses identified issues with last years final prototypes
  • 4. REQUIREMENTS & DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS Requirements (Carried over from pervious year): • Emulate 18-90m shooting distances • Collapsible & Portable • Utilized scaled emulation target faces Design Specifications/goals: • Manufacturability: Cost-Effective, simple design, easy to maintain. • Affordability: Competitive sale price, minimum storage space & weight. • Transportability: Fit to standard shipping, resistant packaging, and lightweight. • User-Friendly: Easy of setup and, easy to move around, simple to repair. • Operational Safety: Minimize hazards, maximize structure factor of safety. First team goal: prove concept, our goal: make cost effective X 122 cm 50 M at 18 M 122 cm 60 M at 18 M X X 122 cm 70 M at 18 M
  • 5. EVOLUTION OF EMULATION STAND DESIGN • Design approach evolved from original stand R&D efforts to increasingly higher fidelity deign solutions over two team life span Design evolution critical to developing optimized design solution Team 1 Phase 2014-2015 Team 2Phase 2015-2016 Team 1 interim Phase summer 2015
  • 6. PROJECT SCHEDULE 201 5 201 6 All key schedule milestones were met
  • 7. PRINCIPAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS Top Case: • Shelving units with two pulleys on top shelf Target Cage: • Cage frame developed from shelving units • Maintains stability during operation by 8 wheels on each corner guided by the main frame corner columns Bottom Cage: • Four wheels mounted at the bottom of the cage for mobility • Particle board where Target Cage sits Motor: • Winch motor used along with pulleys to drive target cage position Design & Analysis performed utilizing SolidWorks
  • 8. CRITICAL ANALYSIS AREA • Buckling of support stands • Tipping Angle of fully erected stand • Deflection (Induced by Tension of Target Cage) resulting in biding & resulting destruction by winch • Ability to fit into max UPS& FedEx shipping limits: Weight: 150 lbs (70 kg). Packages: 165 inches (length and girth combined) Packages: 108 inches in length. • Use of SolidWorks Key to success Failure to solve any key issue would have doomed design
  • 9. ESTIMATED PRODUCTION COST ANALYSIS 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 0 50 100 150 200 250 TotalProductionCostin($) Units Production Savings USD for Bulk Quantities Means In Stock Stock/Make Online Online/Make Abbrv S SM O OM $$$ / Category $167.74 $13.21 $399.43 $30.00 Qty Total 118 8 12 1 %Qty Total 84.89% 5.76% 8.63% 0.72% %Price Total 27.48% 2.16% 65.44% 4.92% Relative Percentages MLB 13:43 Fri April 06, 2016 Lv Part Name UPC/ SKU Description Weight Means Qty Weight Price Savings Lbs O Archery Stand Emulator Product 1 366.9 $854.18 $- Retail $ 1 Stand Mount 132 163.3 $351.59 $351.59 2 Uprights 7 ft P7 Vertical Mount support 3.03 S 8 24.24 41.36 41.36 2 2x Rivet Beam 18 in DR18 Bracket Short Sides 1.29 S 20 25.8 25.2 25.2 2 2x Rivet Beam 60 in DR60 Bracket Long Front/Back 4.32 S 8 34.56 42.32 42.32 2 Particle Board PB6018 Shelf Surface 60*18in 8.19 SM 3 24.57 19.29 19.29 2 Mobile Base MB6024* Base Support with Caster 35.00 S 1 35 78.52 78.52 2 5990K138 Winch 13.80 S 1 13.8 50 50 2 Pulley 2.21577E+11 Pulley for target 1.00 O 2 2 21.6 21.6 Guide Pulley PVC pipe for Winch guide 2.02 S 1 2.02 5.95 5.95 2 Screws for Pulley Screws Pulley 0.02 S 4 0.08 0.48 0.48 Nuts Pulley Nuts for Pulley 0.02 S 8 0.16 2 Guide Casters Vertical Run Casters 0.02 S 4 0.08 10.08 10.08 2 Unite Bracket To unite Stand-units 0.01 S 2 0.02 1 1 2 Bolts Assembly For Shelve Boards 0.02 S 12 0.24 2 Nuts Assemb For Shelve Boards 0.01 S 12 0.12 2 Split Lock Washer For Shelve Boards 0.01 S 12 0.06 22 Washer Assem For Shelve Boards 0.02 S 24 0.48 2 Zip Ties 748726 To hold Rivet Beams 0.01 S 1 0.01 19.97 19.97 2 3/8 Round Dowel 216112 Shim Boards (Vary size) 0.01 S 9 0.09 35.82 35.82 1 Cage Mount 49 202.6 $496.64 $496.64 2 Uprights 56 in P5* Vertical Mount support 2.28 S 4 9.12 14.84 14.84 2 Rivet Beam 54 DR60* Bracket Long Front/Back 3.90 S 3 11.7 15.87 15.87 2 Rivet Beam 14.64 in DR15* Bracket Short Sides 1.06 S 4 4.24 4.4 4.4 Window Spring PL 14624 Target Stability Assist 0.03 O 8 0.24 3.2 3.2 2 FairLead W116 Guidng system for winch 1.00 O 1 1 20 20 2 Foam Taget Holder 66.08 OM 1 66.08 30 30 2 Target AR-152XF Actual Target 75.00 O 1 75 368.226 368.226 2 Bolts For cage rivet beams 0.04 S 4 0.16 0.8 0.8 2 Nuts For cage rivet beams 0.01 S 8 0.04 0.64 0.64 2 Washers For cage rivet beams 0.00 S 8 0.0008 0.8 0.8 3 Steel Plate Base Rnfcmt Support 5.00 SM 5 25 33.9 33.9 3 Lumber Support 845000 2"x"4x6' 5.00 S 2 10 3.96 3.96 Accessories 1 1.0 $5.95 $5.95 1 Rubber Mallet DBM-15 To rivet shelves in place 1.00 S 1 1 5.95 5.95 1 Cord Motor to Motor 0.50 S 1 Extension Cord Motor to Wall 2.90 S Dynamic Archery Stand Emulator Bill of Materials Cost goals met: reduced cost by 60% over last design
  • 10. RESULTS & DISCUSSION Design Objectives: • Manufacturability: Design was composed of off the shelve components. Final design dimensions fit standard shelving unit dimensions. • Affordability: Cost was reduced by %60. Weight was reduced to 150lbs (w/out target foam) • Transportability: Final Dimensions: Assembled: 5’x2’x14’; Disassembled: 8”x27”x14”, Weight: just under 150lbs • User-Friendly: Shelving units: Easy to Assemble/Disassemble and light weight, No special tooling to build stand; Simple to • Operational Safety: Overall Structure: Strong and Stable Ultimate goal: Design for produceability & affordability
  • 11. 2016 SENIOR ARCHERY DESIGN VALIDATION Digital design replicated with 100% in working prototype.