Edit monster (beta)
0 likes956 views
The document appears to be notes from a debate between proponents of the VIM and EMACS text editors. It contains arguments back and forth between the two sides with various points about their respective merits including licenses and commands. At the end a call for peace and prayer for Emacs users is made, suggesting the debate became heated.
Edit monster (beta)
- 2. TEAM 1 100% Vimmer
- 3. SPCAMP TEAM 1 ™ Email: editor_gumi@tehu.me Official Twitter: @editor_gumi
- 6. ______ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 7. ______ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 8. V_____ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 9. VI____ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 10. VIM___ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 11. VIM___ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼
- 12. VIM___ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ▼ ?
- 14. ...
- 16. VIM EMACS
- 18. EMACS !! ?
- 20. EMACS ! EMACS ! VIM ...
- 22. EMACS !
- 24. VIM ! VIM GPL !
- 25. VIM ! VIM GPL !
- 26. VIM ! VIM GPL ! EMACS !
- 28. EMACS !
- 30. VIM 0x3F ! MATZ EMACS VIM !
- 35. vim?
- 36. emacs?
- 39. Gentoo?
- 41. editor
- 42. → →
- 43. Peace!
- 44. No more
- 45. ...
- 48. #pray4emacsist
- 49. Vim × Emacs
- 50. Create
- 52. Security and Programming Camp 201x X Web Gentoo
- 53. Security and Programming Camp 201x X Web Gentoo
- 54. What’s
- 60. ...
- 61. ™
- 62. 201x
- 65. VIM EMACS
Editor's Notes
- #2: \n
- #3: \n
- #4: \n
- #5: \n
- #6: \n
- #7: \n
- #8: \n
- #9: \n
- #10: \n
- #11: \n
- #12: \n
- #13: \n
- #14: \n
- #15: \n
- #16: \n
- #17: \n
- #18: \n
- #19: \n
- #20: \n
- #21: \n
- #22: \n
- #23: \n
- #24: \n
- #25: \n
- #26: \n
- #27: \n
- #28: \n
- #29: \n
- #30: \n
- #31: \n
- #32: \n
- #33: \n
- #34: \n
- #35: \n
- #36: \n
- #37: \n
- #38: \n
- #39: \n
- #40: \n
- #41: \n
- #42: \n
- #43: \n
- #44: \n
- #45: \n
- #46: \n
- #47: \n
- #48: \n
- #49: \n
- #50: \n
- #51: \n
- #52: \n
- #53: \n
- #54: \n
- #55: \n
- #56: \n
- #57: \n
- #58: \n
- #59: \n