Effective Complains management self audit checklist.doc

EFFECTIVE
COMPLAINTS
MANAGEMENT
EFFECTIVE COMPLAINTS MANAGEMENT
SELF AUDIT CHECKLIST
© The State of Queensland
(Office of the Ombudsman) 2006

The Queensland Ombudsman’s Office has developed this Checklist as a resource for agencies to
use to assess their own complaints management policies and practices.
The checklist covers all facets of good complaints management. It is based on the
Ombudsman’s Effective Complaints Management Fact Sheets, which in turn incorporate
relevant material from a wide range of authoritative sources, including in particular –
the Ombudsman’s Office’s more than 30 years experience in managing complaints
in the Queensland State and local government sectors;
Directive 13/06 on Complaints Management Systems (2006) issued by the Office of Public
Service Commissioner (OPSC) Queensland; and
Australian and international Standard AS ASO 100002-2006 Customer Satisfaction –
Guidelines for complaints handling in organisations.
Effective Complaints Management Self Audit Checklist
Introduction ......................................................................................................................................... 1
Element 1 — Setting the Scene ......................................................................................................... 3
Element 2 — Commitment.................................................................................................................. 4
Element 3 — Communication............................................................................................................. 6
Element 4 — Complaints Management Models................................................................................. 8
Element 5 — Visibility and Access...................................................................................................10
Element 7 — Assessment and Action..............................................................................................14
Element 8 — Feedback ....................................................................................................................16
Element 9 — Monitoring Effectiveness ............................................................................................18
Element 10 — Resources...................................................................................................................20
Element 11 — Personnel and Training ............................................................................................22
Element 12 — Remedies..................................................................................................................23
Element 13 — Business Improvement.............................................................................................24
Element 14 — External Review ..........................................................................................................25

Introduction
Do you know how your agency’s complaints management system compares to best
practice? Does your agency’s complaints management system have to comply with the
PSC Directive 13/06?
Can you be sure that complaints are handled consistently and fairly across your agency?
Does your agency use customer feedback to improve the quality of its service?
Would you like to identify what needs to be improved in your agency’s complaints
management system?
This Self Audit Checklist is designed to help you gauge your agency’s performance against best
practice standards (and the PSC Directive if applicable) by evaluating the strengths and weaknesses
of your existing complaints management arrangements and identifying areas for improvement.
Participant instructions
The checklist is a self-assessment diagnostic tool. Each element corresponds to the similarly
named and numbered Fact Sheet. If you need further information on any particular element refer
to the relevant Fact Sheet.
Who should complete the checklist?
Depending on the size and structure of your agency, this checklist may be able to be completed by
one person or may require a team effort. Ideally, a senior member of a customer service team should
be involved. Some questions may need to be referred to other teams or management.
Forming a team that represents the breadth and depth of the customer service function within
your agency may provide the best results. The answers are meant to reflect the position of the
agency as a whole, not just the views of the individual completing the checklist.
Completing the checklist
The checklist comprises five columns that enable you to complete a thorough assessment of
your agency’s current complaints management system. It also helps you to devise action
points to improve your system.
Elements
There are 14 elements. These reflect the essential requirements for effective complaints
management as discussed in the Effective Complaints Management Fact Sheets series.
Indicators
The indicators are the policies, procedures and practices that would be expected in a good
quality internal complaints management system to achieve or satisfy the elements.
As you work through the checklist, it may seem that some indicators are similar or repeated. In some
cases, while the indicators seem similar, they apply in different contexts and therefore have slightly
different meanings. Some elements, e.g. communication and training, apply across a number of
areas. For example, good communication is required in all stages of complaints management.
Queensland Ombudsman - Effective Complaints Management Self Audit Checklist Page 1

Common indicators are repeated where appropriate so that you can get a sense of how your
system fares on each separate element. While this may increase the number of indicators that
you have to consider, having considered them once, you should be able to deal with them
immediately when they next appear.
Assessment
Use the following three-point scale to assess each
indicator: 1. No
2. Partially
3. Yes
N/A Not applicable
Obviously, wherever you have a 1 that indicates an area where your system may require
improvement, and similarly 2s to a lesser extent. A large number of 1s on any element indicate
an area for more comprehensive consideration.
What supports your assessment?
Where you have indicated an assessment of 3 or 2, record the details of the policies,
procedures or practices you have relied upon to make your assessment in this column. This
assists verification and review.
Recommended actions for improvement
In this column detail the strategies or actions your agency needs to implement in order to fully satisfy the
requirements of those indicators you have identified as only partially addressed or not addressed at all.
Action plan
In this column you should try to put your recommended actions for improvement for the indicator
into an action plan. Your action plan should address the process, responsible officers, reporting
requirements and timeframes. A separate sheet may be preferable in some cases.
Putting it all together
Once completed, the checklist should indicate the deficiencies you have identified in your complaints
management system and provide a series of action plans that address those deficiencies.
If you have identified the need for your agency to develop a complaints management policy
and/or procedures, the Ombudsman’s brochure A Guide to Developing Effective Complaints
Management Policies and Procedures provides a framework.
The complaints management policies and/or procedures of a number of Queensland public sector
agencies are also available on our website. These policies and procedures were developed in
consultation with our Office as part of our Complaints Management Project and meet the
requirements of good complaints handling. However, they were developed prior to the Public Service
Commissioner’s Directive on Complaints Management Systems (November 2006) and so any
prepared by state government agencies may need to be revised in light of the Directive.
They were also prepared prior to the introduction of a new international and Australian
Standard on complaints handling in April 2006 (AS ISO 10002-2006). That Standard did not
suggest widespread change, but this checklist and other Ombudsman complaints management
publications have been updated to reflect relevant changes in the Standard.

Element 1 — Setting the Scene
Indicators Assessment What supports your Recommended actions Action plan
3,2,1,N/A assessment? for improvement
1.1 Does your agency currently
handle complaints in a
clear methodical manner
1.2 Is the manner in which
complaints to your agency
are handled widely known
within your agency
1.3 Do your staff know where
to refer complaints
internally
1.4 Is your agency aware of the
requirements of the PSC
Directive 13/06
1.5 Is accountability given
much prominence in
agency documentation
(e.g. Strategic plan, annual
report)
1.6 Is your agency aware of the
benefits of proper
complaints handling as
outlined in the
Ombudsman’s Fact Sheets

Element 2 — Commitment
2.1. Does your agency have
complaints management
policies and procedures
2.2 Does complaints
management in your
agency have the visible
support of senior
management
2.3 Do staff know complaints
management is supported
by senior management
2.4 Have senior management
and other relevant
personnel been consulted
about their needs
2.5 Does your agency have a
complaints friendly culture
whereby complainants and
complaints are viewed
positively
2.6 Are complaints
management staff
appropriately trained and
resourced
2.7 Do they have sufficient
authority

Element 2 — Commitment
2.8 Are appropriate remedies
available
2.9 Is a senior officer
responsible for the
effectiveness of the system
2.10 Are complaints upheld
to any extent

Element 3 — Communication
Indicator Assessment What supports your Recommended action for Action plan
3,2,1,N/A assessment? improvement
Does your agency –
3.1 Have information brochures
that are straightforward and
in plain English
3.2 Have clear arrangements for
non-English speaking people,
those with impairments and
those who have been
educationally disadvantaged
3.3 Advise the public of
indicative times for
responses and actions
3.4 Involve the community in its
policy making and actions on
matters that will affect them
(e.g. by surveys or mail-outs)
3.5 Genuinely address
complainants’ concerns when
advising them of a decision
3.6 Convey to the public a
complaints-friendly culture
that features a ‘your problem
is our problem’ attitude

Element 3 — Communication
3.7 Ask staff and customers to
contribute to the improvement
of your products and services
3.8 Publicise complaints contact
details in the telephone
directory and prominently on
your website.
3.9 Provide training in areas such
as interviewing skills,
problem-solving, conflict
resolution and writing in plain
English
3.10 Encourage staff to speak to
concerned customers rather
than responding in writing
3.11 Clearly define agency
communication practices in
your customer service
standards
3.12 Provide cross-cultural training
for staff and access to
translation and interpreter
services
3.13 Use technology to help
people communicate with
your agency e.g. a
hotline, freecall number,
answering machine/s.

Element 4 — Complaints Management Models
Do your agency’s current processes for handling complaints feature the following:
4.1 A logical and methodical
structure from start to finish
4.2 A structured approach to
dealing with complaints (e.g.
interview sheets, check lists)
4.3 A flexible structure that can
accommodate different units
within your agency
4.4 Clear lines of authority
4.5 A reviewer independent of the
original decision-maker
4.6 Power vested in the
reviewer to overrule the
decision complained of
4.7 No more than 2 internal
stages for the complainant
to go through before
receiving a final decision
4.8 Clear guidance on how
matters move from one
stage to another

Element 4 — Complaints Management Models
4.9 Easy access to relevant
agency material and
personnel
4.10 Control mechanisms to
ensure consistent outcomes
4.11 A mechanism for
implementing a decision in
favour of a complainant
4.12 Direct lines of communication
to the appropriate section for
discussing concerns about
systemic issues arising from
the review of a complaint or
complaints

Element 5 — Visibility and Access
5.1 Can the public, customers,
clients and staff readily find
out where to lodge a
complaint against your
agency with you
5.2 Can they readily find out how
to make their complaint
5.3 Are people able to find out
what information is required
when they complain
5.4 Is it easy for them to lodge
their complaint
5.5 Is assistance available to
people who wish to complain
5.6 Can complaints be made
orally
policy and procedures clearly
visible on its website
5.8 Is a hard copy readily
available upon request
5.9 Can complainants readily
find out how their complaint
will be handled

Element 5 — Visibility and access
5.10 Are complainants told of
possible time frames for
dealing with their complaints
5.11 Are complainants able to
obtain advice as to the
progress of their complaint
5.12 Is all this information readily
available on your website
5.13 Are impaired or
disadvantaged persons
catered for in each of the
above

Element 6 — Responsiveness
6.1 Are your agency’s complaints
management policy and
procedures widely known
about within your agency
6.2 Are they widely understood
6.3 Are they on your intranet
6.4 Have relevant staff been
trained in how your system
works
6.5 Have relevant staff been
trained in how your system
works
6.6 Do you have indicative time
frames for dealing with
matters
6.7 Are they monitored
6.8 Are they met
6.9 Are complainants given
indicative timeframes at the
outset
6.10 Do you prioritise according to
criteria such as seriousness,
urgency

Element 6 — Responsiveness
6.11 Do you have service
standards for whether, and if
so how quickly, you respond
to calls and correspondence
from complainants regarding
matters in progress
6.12 Do your systems enable you
to track timeframes and bring
matters up
6.13 Do you deal with anonymous
complaints

Element 7 — Assessment and Action
7.1 Do you have a methodical
process for assessing
complaints (as opposed to
receiving and recording them)
7.2 Is it clear who should assess
complaints
7.3 Do you have criteria to guide
that assessment e.g. as in
Ombudsman Fact Sheet 7
(seriousness, resources
required, likelihood of an
outcome)
7.4 Do you assess for things other
than fairness (as per the
Ombudsman Act and the
Judicial Review Act)
7.5 Are complaints handling staff
familiar with the jurisdiction of
external agencies that can
potentially handle complaints
made to your agency (e.g.
Ombudsman, CMC, Auditor-
General)
7.6 Are complaints handling
staff familiar with the
Whistleblowers Protection Act
(WPA)

Element 7 — Assessment and Action
7.7 Are procedures in place to
recognise and deal with
disclosures made under the
WPA
7.8 Does your agency’s
policy/procedure encourage
you to resolve matters quickly
and amicably if possible as an
alternative to investigation
7.9 Are complaints handling staff
familiar with the meaning of
natural justice
7.10 Have staff been trained in
complaints investigation
7.11 Do complaints staff have
adequate authority to
make decisions
7.12 Does your agency preserve
complainants’ privacy and
confidentiality (identity,
information gathered)
wherever possible

Element 8 — Feedback
8.1 Do you have service
standards regarding providing
timely advice to complainants
after decisions have been
made
8.2 Do you give meaningful
reasons for negative decisions
that specifically address the
complainant’s contentions
8.3 Are ‘unsuccessful’
complainants automatically
advised of any internal review
available to them e.g. second
level of review, review panels
complainants automatically
advised of any statutory
appeals available to them
(e.g. courts, tribunals)
complainants advised, upon
inquiry by them or via your
website, of any other external
review mechanisms available
to them (e.g. Ombudsman)

Element 8 — Feedback
8.6 Does your system have a clear
and workable mechanism for
complaints staff to advise
areas of the agency when
potential system
improvements are identified
8.7 Does your system have a clear
and workable mechanism for
following up this advice

Element 9 — Monitoring Effectiveness
9.1 Does your agency have any
statutory, policy or procedural
reporting requirements
regarding complaints
9.2 If so, is your current system
able to reliably meet these
requirements
9.3 Are you able to identify
complaint trends from your
complaints data
9.4 Is it clear who is responsible
for identifying complaints
trends
9.5 Does your agency monitor the
time it takes to resolve
complaints
9.6 Does your agency have some
form of review or control, e.g.
file audits, to ensure that data
entry is accurate
structured process and
timetable for evaluating
your procedures
9.8 If so, does that evaluation
include all or most of the
matters mentioned in
Ombudsman Fact Sheet 9

Element 9 — Monitoring Effectiveness
9.9 Do you evaluate outcomes
from time to time
9.10 If so, is the matter resolved to
the complainant’s satisfaction
in a majority of cases
9.11 Are the results of your
system reported to staff
9.12 Does your agency publish
effectiveness criteria, such as:
numbers and types of
complaints received;
time taken to resolve, as
measured against targets;
outcomes in broad
categories (e.g.
resolved/not resolved);
remedies provided (again
in categories);
satisfaction levels based
on surveys; and
action taken/business
improvement as a result of
complaints

Element 10 — Resources
Do your agency have or provide –
10.1 A detailed complaints
handling procedures manual
and reference material readily
available to complaints staff
10.2 Modern information and
communication complaints
management technology and
equipment that can both track
individual cases and classify
and report on aggregate data
10.3 A toll-free complaints hotline
that connects directly to the
complaints section or
designated officer
10.4 An answering machine for
messages to be left when
the complaints section is
unstaffed or busy
10.5 Hands-free telephone
equipment for complaints
staff so that they may take
notes as they talk
10.6 A user-friendly complaints
handling environment with
low levels of noise and
adequate interview facilities

Element 10 — Resources
10.7 Information about complaints
stages and processes and
how to contact your
complaints area included in
resources such as leaflets and
website
10.8 An on-line complaints form
and guidelines for customers
on how to complain easily
located on your website (not
buried under a name such as
‘Policies’ with numerous other
documents)
10.9 Assistance for customers
unable to write or
communicate due to
language or literacy
difficulties or disability

Element 11 — Personnel and Training
11.1 Are complaints staff happy to
do the job
11.2 Are complaints staff
personally suited to the job
(see Fact Sheet 11)
11.3 Are complaints staff
organisationally positioned to
do the job (see Fact Sheet 11)
11.4 Have staff received training in
good decision-making
complaints handling
such things as dispute
resolution, negotiation,
handling difficult people,
interviewing skills, customer
service
11.7 Are complaints staff able to
de-brief
11.8 Does your agency offer
complaints staff any other
mechanism or assistance
for dealing with stress

Element 12 — Remedies
Does your system –
12.1 Offer an appropriate range of
possible remedies (see Fact
Sheet 12)
12.2 Indicate when each remedy is
available
12.3 Indicate who may decide
a particular remedy
12.4 Allow the possibility of
ex gratia payments in
appropriate cases
12.5 Encourage informal
resolution and compromise
as a first option
12.6 Identify other parties who
might be entitled to a
remedy granted as a result
of a complaint by another
similarly placed person

Element 13 — Business Improvement
13.1 Does your agency’s
policy emphasise that
business/systemic
improvement and improved
service to the public and
customers are major
objectives of complaints
management
13.2 Does your system allow
complaint trends to be
identified periodically
13.3 If so are those trends analysed
for underlying systemic causes
13.4 Is it clear who has
responsibility for making
that analysis
13.5 Are these analyses reported
to senior management
13.6 Are these analyses fed back
to the relevant business area
or unit for remedial action
13.7 Is there follow up by a
designated person to
see if remedial action
has been taken

Element 14 — External Review
14.1 Does your system indicate the
various external review
options available to
dissatisfied complainants
14.2 Does your policy emphasize
the desirability of resolving
matters with complainants if at
all possible rather than
engaging in time consuming
external review
14.3 Do you automatically
advise people of external
statutory appeal rights
(e.g. to courts, tribunals)
14.4 Do you advise people upon
inquiry or via your website
of other external review
options (e.g. Ombudsman)

Effective Complains management self audit checklist.doc

More Related Content

Similar to Effective Complains management self audit checklist.doc (20)

More from NeerajOjha17 (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Effective Complains management self audit checklist.doc