Endometrics root canal working length determination
- 1. 1 ENDOMETRICS Root canal working length determination DHANAVEL.C .MDS
- 2. 2 1. Radiographic methods 2. Digital tactile sense 3. Electronic methods 4. Apical periodontal sensitivity 5. Paper point measurements
- 3. 3 Working length - defined in the endodontic Glossary as “the distance from a coronal reference point to the point at which canal preparation and obturation should terminate.
- 4. 4 The anatomic apex - the tip or the end of the root determined morphologically, whereas The radiographic apex - the tip or end of the root determined radiographically.
- 5. 5 The apical foramen – the main apical opening of the root canal. It is frequently eccentrically located away from the anatomic or radiographic apex.
- 6. 6
- 7. 7 The apical constriction (minor apical diameter) – the apical portion of the root canal having the narrowest diameter. This position may vary but is usually 0.5 to 1.0 mm short of the center of the apical foramen. The minor diameter widens apically to the foramen (major diameter) and assumes a funnel shape.
- 8. 8 Diagrammatic view of the periapex. The importance of differentiating between the minor diameter (apical stop) and the major diameter (radiographic apex) is apparent.
- 9. 9 The cementodentinal junction – the region where the dentin and cementum are united, the point at which the cemental surface terminates at or near the apex of a tooth. cementodentinal junction does not always coincide with the apical constriction. The location of the CDJ ranges from 0.5 to 3.0 mm short of the anatomic apex.
- 10. 10 Theoretically, the canal preparation and, thus, the canal filling should terminate at the cemento-dentinal junction.
- 11. 11 Reference points The measurement should be made from a secure reference point on the crown, in close proximity to the straight-line path of the instrument, a point that can be identified and monitored accurately. A definite, repeatable plane of reference to an anatomic landmark on the tooth – necessary.
- 12. 12 A- Do not use weakened enamel walls or diagonal lines of fracture as a reference site for length- of-tooth measurement. B- Weakened cusps or incisal edges are reduced to a well-supported tooth structure. Diagonal surfaces should be flattened to give an accurate site of reference.
- 13. 13 Radiographic – Grossman’s method Other formula based methods Ingle’s method According to Kuttler’s studies Wire Grid method Non-radiographic – Using digital tactile sense Apical periodontal sensitivity Paper point evaluation Electronic methods: based on resistance, impedance, frequency
- 14. 14 Determination of Working Length by digital tactile sense Earliest method Although it may appear to be very simple, its accuracy depends on sufficient experience. The clinician should be able to literally feel the foramen by tactile sense. Confirmation may be done either by the radiographic or electronic method. If the coronal portion of the canal is not constricted, an experienced clinician may detect an increase in resistance as the file approaches the apical 2 to 3 mm.
- 15. 15 Determination of Working Length by Apical periodontal sensitivity Any method of working length determination, based on the patient’s response to pain, does not meet the ideal method of determining WL
- 16. 16 Determination of Working Length by Paper Point Measurement In a root canal with an immature (wide open) apex, the most reliable means of determining WL is to gently pass the blunt end of a paper point into the canal after profound anesthesia The moisture or blood on the portion of the paper point that passes beyond the apex - an estimation of WL or the junction between the root apex and the bone.
- 17. 17 This method, however, may give unreliable data – If the pulp not completely removed If the tooth – pulpless but a periapical lesion rich in blood supply present If paper point – left in canal for a long time
- 18. Determination of Working Length by Radiographic methods 18
- 19. 19 Grossman’s method Grossman (1970, 7th ed.) gave the following formula for determining the correct length of the tooth – rule of proportion basis CLT = KLI × ALT / ALI Where, CLT= correct length of the tooth KLI= known length of the instrument in the tooth ALT= apparent length of the tooth on radiograph ALI= apparent length of the instrument on radiograph
- 20. 20 A, The length of the tooth is measured on the diagnostic radiograph (schematic view). B, This measurement is transferred to a diagnostic instrument prepared with a silicone stop, the instrument is placed in the root canal, and a radiograph is made. C and D, The root canal and working lengths are determined from the radiograph.
- 21. 21 However, it is suggested that the working length should be arbitrarily established 0.5 to 1.0 mm shorter than the measured canal length (because the actual length of the tooth is 1.2 mm less than the radiographic image and the apical foramen is approx. 0.3 mm short of the actual root tip) When apical resorption – evident on a radiograph, WL should be reduced by 1.5 to 2.0 mm
- 22. 22 Other formula based methods Bregman (1950) – devised a method – 25 mm length flat probes – having a steel blade fixed with acrylic resin as a stop leaving a free end of 10mm for placement into the root canal. This probe is placed in the tooth until the metallic end touches the coronal reference point. A radiograph is taken The length is calculated from following formula:
- 23. 23 Best (1960) – fixed a 10 mm metal wire to the outer lingual surface of the tooth with utility wax keeping it parallel to the long axis. After the film is exposed and processed, the length is determined with the help of a special ruler Bramnate (1974) – used st. steel probes of various calibres and lengths – bent at one end at a right angle – this bend inserted partially in acrylic resin such that its internal face flush with the resin surface contacting the tooth surface – The probe introduced into the canal so that the resin touches the incisal edge or cusp tip & radiograph taken
- 24. 24 INGLES METHOD The following items are essential to perform this procedure: 1.Good, undistorted, preoperative radiographs showing the total length and all roots of the involved tooth. 2.Adequate coronal access to all canals. 3.An endodontic millimeter ruler. 4.Working knowledge of the average length of all of the teeth.
- 25. 25 Method 1. Measure the tooth on the preoperative radiograph 2. Subtract at least 1.0 mm “safety allowance” for possible image distortion or magnification. 3. Set the endodontic ruler at this tentative working length and adjust the stop on the instrument at that level 4. Place the instrument in the canal until the stop is at the plane of reference unless pain is felt (if anesthesia has not been used), in which case, the instrument is left at that level and the rubber stop readjusted to this new point of reference.
- 26. 26 5. Expose, develop, and clear the radiograph 6. On the radiograph, measure the difference between the end of the instrument and the end of the root and add this amount to the original measured length the instrument extended into the tooth. If, through some oversight, the exploring instrument has gone beyond the apex, subtract this difference. 7. From this adjusted length of tooth, subtract a 1.0 mm “safety factor” to conform with the apical termination of the root canal at the apical constriction
- 27. 27
- 28. 28 Weine’s modification - If, radiographically, there is no resorption of the root end or bone, shorten the length by the standard 1.0 mm. If periapical bone resorption is apparent, shorten by 1.5 mm, and if both root and bone resorption are apparent, shorten by 2.0 mm
- 29. 29 Weine’s recommendations for determining working length based on radiographic evidence of root/bone resorption. A, If no root or bone resorption is evident, preparation should terminate 1.0 mm from the apical foramen. B, If bone resorption is apparent but there is no root resorption, shorten the length by 1.5 mm. C, If both root and bone resorption are apparent, shorten the length by 2.0 mm.
- 30. 30 Expanded radiographic paradigms for Determination of Working Length Xeroradiography Digital image processing Radiovisiography
- 31. 31 Xeroradiography Xeroradiography – an electrostatic imaging system – that uses a uniformly charged x-ray sensitive selenium alloy photoreceptor plate in a light-proof cassette. When exposed to x-rays, the charge on the photoreceptor plate – dissipated according to tissue density A latent electrostatic image produced
- 32. 32 This latent image then transformed into a visible image by deposition of specially pigmented particles The visible image – transferred to a base sheet – that can be viewed either by reflected light or a trans-illuminated light
- 33. 33 Advantages: Produces image of superior quality – edge enhancement property and sharper contrast Radiation levels are reduced to only 1/3rd Rapid – require only 20 sec to produce a permanent dry image
- 34. 34 Disadvantages: Large areas of bone > 2 cm are shown better with conventional intra oral film technique than with xeroradiography Greater degree of artefacts than in conventional technique
- 35. 35 RadioVisioGraphy (RVG) This system is comprised of three main components: Radio portion - a conventional x-ray head connected to microprocessor - enables the unit to produce short radiation exposure times. Instead of a conventional silver halide-based film, the receptor is a sensor that consists of a scintillation screen, a fibre optic instrument, and a charged coupling device imaging system. Visio section holds the signal - then converts it by unit area into 256 shades of gray.
- 36. 36 Graphy portion of the system is a storage module that can be connected to a final imaging display. The module also can store the image electronically. The finial image can be printed out using thermal paper or stored electronically for future retrieval. Typical radiation doses can be upto 75% lower than those in conventional radiography.
- 37. 37 Determination of Working Length by Electronic methods Electronic apex locator (EAL) – Most important advancement in the recent decade - Advancement in microchip technology In today’s practice - one of the most important and essential instrument in endodontic practice These devices all attempt to locate the apical constriction, the cemento- dentinal junction, or the apical foramen.
- 38. 38 Classification and Accuracy of Apex Locators First-generation apex locators – based on Resistance Second-generation apex locators – based on Impedance Third-generation apex locators – based on Frequency
- 39. 39 First-Generation Apex Locators First-generation apex location devices, also known as resistance apex locators Measure opposition to the flow of direct current or resistance. When the tip of the reamer reaches the apex in the canal, the resistance value is 6.5 kilo-ohms (current 40 mA) often yield inaccurate results in presence of electrolytes, excessive moisture, vital pulp tissue, exudates, blood
- 40. 40 Second-Generation Apex Locators. Second-generation apex locators, also known as impedance apex locators measure opposition to the flow of alternating current or impedance Uses the electronic mechanism that the highest impedance is at the apical constricture where impedance changes drastically
- 41. 41 Disadvantages – The major disadvantage of second-generation apex locators the root canal has to be reasonably free of electro-conductive materials to obtain accurate readings. The presence of tissue and electro- conductive irrigants in the canal changes the electrical characteristics and leads to inaccurate, usually shorter measurements.
- 42. 42 Third-Generation Apex Locators. Frequency dependant apex locators – Introduced in 1990s
- 43. 43 Advantages of EALs Devices are mobile, light weight and easy to use Much less time required Additional radiation to the patient can be reduced (particularly useful in cases of pregnancy) 80 - 97 % accuracy observed
- 44. 44 Disadvantages of EALs A learning curve required Accuracy limited to mature root apices Extensive periapical lesion can give faulty readings Weak batteries can affect accuracy Can interfere with functioning of artificial cardiac pacemakers – cuatious use in such patients
- 45. 45 Summary & Conclusion The CDJ or minor diameter is a practical and anatomic termination point for the preparation and obturation of the root canal – and this cannot be determined radiographically Modern apex locators can determine this position with accuracies greater than 90% but with some limitations No individual method is truly satisfactory in determining endodontic working length
- 46. 46 Therefore, combination of methods should be used to assess the accurate working length determination
- 47. 47