INDIA RANKINGS 2020
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK
Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India
(RANKING METRICS FOR ENGINEERING)
Ministry of Human Resource Development
Summary of Ranking Parameters and Weightages- 2020
(Engineering)
Sr.
No.
Parameter Marks Weightage
1 Teaching, Learning & Resources 100 0.30
2 Research and Professional Practice 100 0.30
3 Graduation Outcomes 100 0.20
4 Outreach and Inclusivity 100 0.10
5 Perception 100 0.10
S.No. Parameters Marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR)
Ranking weight: 0.30
100
A. Student Strength including Doctoral Students(SS): 20 marks
B. Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30
marks
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and
Experience (FQE): 20 marks
D. Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 marks
2. Research and Professional Practice (RP)
Ranking weight: 0.30
100
A. Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks
B. Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 marks
C. IPR and Patents: Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks
3. Graduation Outcomes (GO)
Ranking weight: 0.20
100
A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks
B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 marks
C. Median Salary (GMS): 25 marks
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 marks
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI)
Ranking weight: 0.10
100
A. Percentage of Students from other States/Countries (Region Diversity
RD): 30 marks
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS): 20 marks
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks
5. Perception (PR)
Ranking weight: 0.10
100
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR): 100 marks
1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30
• Overall Assessment Metric:
TLR = SS (20) + FSR (30) + FQE (20) + FRU (30)
• Component metrics based on :
A. Student Strength including Ph.D. Students: SS
B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty: FSR
C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience:
FQE
D. Financial Resources and Their Utilisation: FRU
A. Student Strength including Ph.D. students (SS): 20 Marks
• SS = f(NT, NE) × 15 + f(NP) × 5
• The functions f(NT ,NE) and f(Np) are functions to be determined by NIRF.
• NT: Total sanctioned approved intake in the institution considering all UG and PG
programs of the institution.
• NE: Total number of students enrolled in the institution considering all UG and PG
Programs of the institution.
• Np = Total number of students enrolled for the doctoral program till previous academic
year.
• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed Format.
B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks
• FSR = 30 × [15 × (F/N)]
• N =NT+ Np
• F: Full time regular faculty in the institution in the previous year.
• Regular appointment means Faculty on Full time basis. Faculty on contract basis/ad-hoc
basis will be considered if the concerned faculty has taught in both the semesters of
academic year 2018-19.
• Faculty members with Ph.D. and M.E./M.Tech. will be considered and counted here.
Faculty member with a Bachelor’s degree will not be counted.
• Expected ratio is 1:15 to score maximum marks.
• For F/N < 1: 50, FSR will be set to zero.
• Primary Data: Faculty List to be provided in the Prescribed Format.
C. Combined Metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks
• FQ = 10 × (FRA/95) , FRA < 95%;
• FQ = 10, FRA ≥ 95%.
• Here FRA is the percentage of Faculty with Ph.D. (or equivalent qualification) with
respect to the total no. of faculty required or actual faculty whichever is higher, in the
previous year.
F1=Fraction with Experience up to 8 years;
F2= Fraction with Experience between 8+ to 15 years;
F3=Fraction with Experience > 15 years.
• FE = 3min(3F1, 1) + 3 min(3F2, 1) + 4 min(3F3, 1)
Rationale: Full marks for a ratio of 1:1:1
• FQE = FQ + FE
• Primary Data: Faculty List in the Prescribed Format.
D: Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 Marks
• FRU = 7.5×f(BC) + 22.5×f(BO)
• BC: Average Annual Capital Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining
to engineering discipline only. (Excluding expenditure on construction of new
buildings)
• BO: Average Annual Operational(or Recurring) Expenditure per student for previous
three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding maintenance of
hostels and allied services)
• Primary Data: Figures in prescribed format for each.
2.Research and Professional Practice (RP): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.30
• Overall Assessment Metric:
RP = PU(35) + QP(40) + IPR(15) + FPPP(10)
• The component metrics explained on following pages.
A. Combined Metric for Publications: PU
B. Combined Metric for Quality of Publications: QP
C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted: IPR
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice: FPPP
A.Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks
• PU = 35 × f(P/FRQ)
• P is weighted number of publications as acertained from suitable third party sources.
• FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of
a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution.
• Sources: Third party sources.
B.Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 Marks
• QP = 20 × f (CC/FRQ) + 20× f (TOP25P/P)
• Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous three years.
• P is as computed for PU.
• TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three
years.
• FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis
of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution.
• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks
• IPR = IPG + IPP
IPG = 10× f (PG)
• PG is the number of patents granted over the previous three years.
IPP = 5 × f (PP)
• PP: No. of patents published over the previous three years.
• Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks
• FPPP = FPR + FPC
• FPR = 7.5 × f (RF)
• RF is average annual research funding earnings (amount actually received in rupees) per
faculty at institute level in previous three years.
• FPC = 2.5 × f (CF)
• CF is average annual consultancy amount (amount actually received in rupees) per
faculty at institute level in previous three years.
3. Graduation Outcome (GO):100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.20
• Overall Assessment Metric:
• GO = GPH(40) + GUE(15) + GMS(25) + GPHD(20)
• The component metrics are explained on the following pages:
A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies: GPH
B. Metric for University Examinations: GUE
C. Median Salary: GMS
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated: GPHD
A. Combined Metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks
• GPH = 40 × (Np/100 +Nhs/100)
• Np = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) placed in the previous
three years.
• Nhs = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) who have been selected
for higher studies in the previous three years.
• Primary Data: To be provided in prescribed format.
B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 Marks
• GUE = 15 × min [(Ng/80), 1]
• Ng is the percentage of Students (as a fraction of the approved intake), averaged over
previous three years, passing the respective university examinations in stipulated time
for the program in which enrolled.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
C. Median Salary(GMS): 25 Marks
• GMS = 25 × f (MS)
• MS = Median salary of graduates (in UG/PG program) in the previous three years
from an institution.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
D. Metric for Number of Ph.D Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 Marks
• GPHD = 20 × f(Nphd)
• Nphd = Average number of Ph.D students graduated (awarded Ph.D) over the previous
three years.
• Primary Data: Number of graduating Ph.D. Students as reflected in the approved
Annual Report/Convocation Report to be provided in the prescribed format.
4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.10
• Overall Assessment Metric: OI = RD(30) + WD(30) +ESCS(20) + PCS(20)
• The component metrics are explained on following pages:
A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity): RD
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity): WD
C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students: ESCS
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students: PCS
A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks
• RD = 25 × fraction of total students enrolled from other states + 5 × fraction of
students enrolled from other countries
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks
• WD = 15 × (NWS/50) + 15 × (NWF/20)
• NWS are the percentage of Women students.
• NWF are the percentage of Women Faculty including the women members in senior
administrative positions, such as Heads of Departments, Deans or Institute Heads.
• Expectation: 50% women students and 20% women faculty.
• Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
C.Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS) : 20 marks
• ESCS = 20 × f(Nesc)
• Nesc is the percentage of UG students being provided full tuition fee rembursement by
the institution to pursue their degree programs.
• Primary Data: To be provided by the institution in the prescribed format.
D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks
• PCS = 20 marks, if the Institute provides full facilities for physically challenged
students, as outlined.
Else, in proportion to facilities.
• Basis: Verifiable Responses to Questions.
• Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed format.
5. Perception (PR) – 100 marks
• Ranking weight: 0.1
• Overall Assessment Metric: PR = 100
• Component metrics are explained in the following pages:
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peers: (PR)
A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR) : 100 marks
• This is to be done through a survey conducted over a large category of Employers,
Professionals from Reputed Organizations and a large category of academics to
ascertain their preference for graduates of different institutions.
• Comprehensive list will be prepared taking into account various sectors, regions, etc.
• Lists to be updated periodically.

More Related Content

PPT
PDF
Lecture01: Introduction to Photogrammetry
PPT
Mesures radar
PPTX
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
PPTX
PDF
Rankin LiDAR presentation
PPTX
neural-networks (1)
PDF
Unmanned Aerial Systems for Precision Mapping
Lecture01: Introduction to Photogrammetry
Mesures radar
A Tutorial on Radar System Engineering
Rankin LiDAR presentation
neural-networks (1)
Unmanned Aerial Systems for Precision Mapping

What's hot (20)

PPT
Monopulse tracking radar
PDF
PHOTOGRAMMETRY: GROUND CONTROL FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY نقاط الضبط الأرضي في...
PDF
Design and Analysis of FSS Radomes
PPT
Target tracking
PPTX
Space segment
PPT
introduction-of-GNSS-1
PDF
DSD-INT 2015 - Photogrammetric workflows and use of UA VS, Francesco nex, E-s...
PDF
Digital photogrammetry
PPT
Global Positing System
PPTX
GPS Aircraft Tracking
PDF
Introduction to GNSS (1)
PDF
CEDEC 2018 - Towards Effortless Photorealism Through Real-Time Raytracing
PPTX
LiDAR acquisition
PPT
Introduction-of-GNSS-2
PPT
UAV Presentation
PPTX
Radio and Radar: Radar
PPTX
Lidar : light detection and rangeing
PPT
Gps in remote sensing, pk mani
PPTX
Concept of gps
PPTX
Aerial Photography.pptx
Monopulse tracking radar
PHOTOGRAMMETRY: GROUND CONTROL FOR AERIAL PHOTOGRAMMETRY نقاط الضبط الأرضي في...
Design and Analysis of FSS Radomes
Target tracking
Space segment
introduction-of-GNSS-1
DSD-INT 2015 - Photogrammetric workflows and use of UA VS, Francesco nex, E-s...
Digital photogrammetry
Global Positing System
GPS Aircraft Tracking
Introduction to GNSS (1)
CEDEC 2018 - Towards Effortless Photorealism Through Real-Time Raytracing
LiDAR acquisition
Introduction-of-GNSS-2
UAV Presentation
Radio and Radar: Radar
Lidar : light detection and rangeing
Gps in remote sensing, pk mani
Concept of gps
Aerial Photography.pptx
Ad

Similar to Engineering nirf ranking methodlogy (20)

PDF
Criteria 6 Faculty information TO 50624.pdf
PDF
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
PPTX
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
PDF
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
PPTX
Academic performance indicators (api)
PDF
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
PPTX
NBA presentation Mechatronics department.pptx
PPTX
Ranking_Improvement_NIRF to consider for engineering.pptx
PDF
NBA SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT( SAR) PREPARATION
PPTX
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
PPTX
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
PPTX
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
PPTX
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
PDF
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
PDF
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
PDF
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
PPTX
PPT for Oriontation workshop at habitat on 10.10.24_AKN
PPTX
Nba co attainment
PPT
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
PDF
BU Overall.pdf
Criteria 6 Faculty information TO 50624.pdf
NBA criteria 3 and 4 for Tier 1 institute
NBA Criteria in Detail.pptx
academicperformanceindicatorsapi-190123081235.pdf
Academic performance indicators (api)
evaluator-report-Part-B-pg-engg-v0.pdf
NBA presentation Mechatronics department.pptx
Ranking_Improvement_NIRF to consider for engineering.pptx
NBA SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT( SAR) PREPARATION
C7 Presentation.pptx.pptx
QUALITY INDICATOR FRAMEWORK (QIF)
QIF Quality Indicative Framework
NAAC Assessment and Accreditation Process in Affiliated Colleges
Affiliated_College_Benchmarks_5-12-2022.pdf
ug-pharmacy-sar-v0.pdf
pre-qualifiers-ug-pharmacy.pdf
PPT for Oriontation workshop at habitat on 10.10.24_AKN
Nba co attainment
Basic informatiion for pharmacy faculty members in India
BU Overall.pdf
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
LOW POWER CLASS AB SI POWER AMPLIFIER FOR WIRELESS MEDICAL SENSOR NETWORK
PPTX
CyberSecurity Mobile and Wireless Devices
PDF
UEFA_Carbon_Footprint_Calculator_Methology_2.0.pdf
PDF
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
PDF
Computer System Architecture 3rd Edition-M Morris Mano.pdf
PDF
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
PDF
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
PDF
distributed database system" (DDBS) is often used to refer to both the distri...
PDF
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
PDF
August 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in Network Security & Its Applications
PPTX
Feature types and data preprocessing steps
PPTX
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
PPTX
Chapter 2 -Technology and Enginerring Materials + Composites.pptx
PDF
Unit I -OPERATING SYSTEMS_SRM_KATTANKULATHUR.pptx.pdf
PPTX
Principal presentation for NAAC (1).pptx
PDF
Implantable Drug Delivery System_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
PPTX
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx
PDF
Applications of Equal_Area_Criterion.pdf
PDF
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
PDF
Influence of Green Infrastructure on Residents’ Endorsement of the New Ecolog...
LOW POWER CLASS AB SI POWER AMPLIFIER FOR WIRELESS MEDICAL SENSOR NETWORK
CyberSecurity Mobile and Wireless Devices
UEFA_Carbon_Footprint_Calculator_Methology_2.0.pdf
Abrasive, erosive and cavitation wear.pdf
Computer System Architecture 3rd Edition-M Morris Mano.pdf
August -2025_Top10 Read_Articles_ijait.pdf
UEFA_Embodied_Carbon_Emissions_Football_Infrastructure.pdf
distributed database system" (DDBS) is often used to refer to both the distri...
Design Guidelines and solutions for Plastics parts
August 2025 - Top 10 Read Articles in Network Security & Its Applications
Feature types and data preprocessing steps
Sorting and Hashing in Data Structures with Algorithms, Techniques, Implement...
Chapter 2 -Technology and Enginerring Materials + Composites.pptx
Unit I -OPERATING SYSTEMS_SRM_KATTANKULATHUR.pptx.pdf
Principal presentation for NAAC (1).pptx
Implantable Drug Delivery System_NDDS_BPHARMACY__SEM VII_PCI .pdf
Management Information system : MIS-e-Business Systems.pptx
Applications of Equal_Area_Criterion.pdf
20250617 - IR - Global Guide for HR - 51 pages.pdf
Influence of Green Infrastructure on Residents’ Endorsement of the New Ecolog...

Engineering nirf ranking methodlogy

  • 1. INDIA RANKINGS 2020 NATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL RANKING FRAMEWORK Methodology for Ranking of Academic Institutions in India (RANKING METRICS FOR ENGINEERING) Ministry of Human Resource Development
  • 2. Summary of Ranking Parameters and Weightages- 2020 (Engineering) Sr. No. Parameter Marks Weightage 1 Teaching, Learning & Resources 100 0.30 2 Research and Professional Practice 100 0.30 3 Graduation Outcomes 100 0.20 4 Outreach and Inclusivity 100 0.10 5 Perception 100 0.10
  • 3. S.No. Parameters Marks 1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR) Ranking weight: 0.30 100 A. Student Strength including Doctoral Students(SS): 20 marks B. Faculty-student ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks D. Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 marks 2. Research and Professional Practice (RP) Ranking weight: 0.30 100 A. Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks B. Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 marks C. IPR and Patents: Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks 3. Graduation Outcomes (GO) Ranking weight: 0.20 100 A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 marks C. Median Salary (GMS): 25 marks D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 marks 4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI) Ranking weight: 0.10 100 A. Percentage of Students from other States/Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS): 20 marks D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks 5. Perception (PR) Ranking weight: 0.10 100 A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR): 100 marks
  • 4. 1. Teaching, Learning & Resources (TLR): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.30 • Overall Assessment Metric: TLR = SS (20) + FSR (30) + FQE (20) + FRU (30) • Component metrics based on : A. Student Strength including Ph.D. Students: SS B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty: FSR C. Combined metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience: FQE D. Financial Resources and Their Utilisation: FRU
  • 5. A. Student Strength including Ph.D. students (SS): 20 Marks • SS = f(NT, NE) × 15 + f(NP) × 5 • The functions f(NT ,NE) and f(Np) are functions to be determined by NIRF. • NT: Total sanctioned approved intake in the institution considering all UG and PG programs of the institution. • NE: Total number of students enrolled in the institution considering all UG and PG Programs of the institution. • Np = Total number of students enrolled for the doctoral program till previous academic year. • Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed Format.
  • 6. B. Faculty-Student Ratio with emphasis on permanent faculty (FSR): 30 marks • FSR = 30 × [15 × (F/N)] • N =NT+ Np • F: Full time regular faculty in the institution in the previous year. • Regular appointment means Faculty on Full time basis. Faculty on contract basis/ad-hoc basis will be considered if the concerned faculty has taught in both the semesters of academic year 2018-19. • Faculty members with Ph.D. and M.E./M.Tech. will be considered and counted here. Faculty member with a Bachelor’s degree will not be counted. • Expected ratio is 1:15 to score maximum marks. • For F/N < 1: 50, FSR will be set to zero. • Primary Data: Faculty List to be provided in the Prescribed Format.
  • 7. C. Combined Metric for Faculty with PhD (or equivalent) and Experience (FQE): 20 marks • FQ = 10 × (FRA/95) , FRA < 95%; • FQ = 10, FRA ≥ 95%. • Here FRA is the percentage of Faculty with Ph.D. (or equivalent qualification) with respect to the total no. of faculty required or actual faculty whichever is higher, in the previous year. F1=Fraction with Experience up to 8 years; F2= Fraction with Experience between 8+ to 15 years; F3=Fraction with Experience > 15 years. • FE = 3min(3F1, 1) + 3 min(3F2, 1) + 4 min(3F3, 1) Rationale: Full marks for a ratio of 1:1:1 • FQE = FQ + FE • Primary Data: Faculty List in the Prescribed Format.
  • 8. D: Financial Resources and their Utilisation (FRU): 30 Marks • FRU = 7.5×f(BC) + 22.5×f(BO) • BC: Average Annual Capital Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding expenditure on construction of new buildings) • BO: Average Annual Operational(or Recurring) Expenditure per student for previous three years pertaining to engineering discipline only. (Excluding maintenance of hostels and allied services) • Primary Data: Figures in prescribed format for each.
  • 9. 2.Research and Professional Practice (RP): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.30 • Overall Assessment Metric: RP = PU(35) + QP(40) + IPR(15) + FPPP(10) • The component metrics explained on following pages. A. Combined Metric for Publications: PU B. Combined Metric for Quality of Publications: QP C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted: IPR D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice: FPPP
  • 10. A.Combined metric for Publications (PU): 35 marks • PU = 35 × f(P/FRQ) • P is weighted number of publications as acertained from suitable third party sources. • FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution. • Sources: Third party sources.
  • 11. B.Combined metric for Quality of Publications (QP): 40 Marks • QP = 20 × f (CC/FRQ) + 20× f (TOP25P/P) • Here CC is Total Citation Count over previous three years. • P is as computed for PU. • TOP25P: Number of citations in top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three years. • FRQ is the maximun of nominal number of faculty members as calculated on the basis of a required FSR of 1:15 or the available faculty in the institution. • Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
  • 12. C. IPR and Patents: Patents Published and Granted (IPR): 15 marks • IPR = IPG + IPP IPG = 10× f (PG) • PG is the number of patents granted over the previous three years. IPP = 5 × f (PP) • PP: No. of patents published over the previous three years. • Primary Data: Third Party Sources.
  • 13. D. Footprint of Projects and Professional Practice (FPPP): 10 marks • FPPP = FPR + FPC • FPR = 7.5 × f (RF) • RF is average annual research funding earnings (amount actually received in rupees) per faculty at institute level in previous three years. • FPC = 2.5 × f (CF) • CF is average annual consultancy amount (amount actually received in rupees) per faculty at institute level in previous three years.
  • 14. 3. Graduation Outcome (GO):100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.20 • Overall Assessment Metric: • GO = GPH(40) + GUE(15) + GMS(25) + GPHD(20) • The component metrics are explained on the following pages: A. Combined metric for Placement and Higher Studies: GPH B. Metric for University Examinations: GUE C. Median Salary: GMS D. Metric for Number of Ph.D. Students Graduated: GPHD
  • 15. A. Combined Metric for Placement and Higher Studies (GPH): 40 marks • GPH = 40 × (Np/100 +Nhs/100) • Np = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) placed in the previous three years. • Nhs = Percentage of graduating students (in UG/ PG programs) who have been selected for higher studies in the previous three years. • Primary Data: To be provided in prescribed format.
  • 16. B. Metric for University Examinations (GUE): 15 Marks • GUE = 15 × min [(Ng/80), 1] • Ng is the percentage of Students (as a fraction of the approved intake), averaged over previous three years, passing the respective university examinations in stipulated time for the program in which enrolled. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 17. C. Median Salary(GMS): 25 Marks • GMS = 25 × f (MS) • MS = Median salary of graduates (in UG/PG program) in the previous three years from an institution. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 18. D. Metric for Number of Ph.D Students Graduated (GPHD): 20 Marks • GPHD = 20 × f(Nphd) • Nphd = Average number of Ph.D students graduated (awarded Ph.D) over the previous three years. • Primary Data: Number of graduating Ph.D. Students as reflected in the approved Annual Report/Convocation Report to be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 19. 4. Outreach and Inclusivity (OI): 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.10 • Overall Assessment Metric: OI = RD(30) + WD(30) +ESCS(20) + PCS(20) • The component metrics are explained on following pages: A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity): RD B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity): WD C. Economically and Socially Challenged Students: ESCS D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students: PCS
  • 20. A. Percentage of Students from other States/ Countries (Region Diversity RD): 30 marks • RD = 25 × fraction of total students enrolled from other states + 5 × fraction of students enrolled from other countries • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 21. B. Percentage of Women (Women Diversity WD): 30 marks • WD = 15 × (NWS/50) + 15 × (NWF/20) • NWS are the percentage of Women students. • NWF are the percentage of Women Faculty including the women members in senior administrative positions, such as Heads of Departments, Deans or Institute Heads. • Expectation: 50% women students and 20% women faculty. • Primary Data: To be provided in the prescribed format.
  • 22. C.Economically and Socially Challenged Students (ESCS) : 20 marks • ESCS = 20 × f(Nesc) • Nesc is the percentage of UG students being provided full tuition fee rembursement by the institution to pursue their degree programs. • Primary Data: To be provided by the institution in the prescribed format.
  • 23. D. Facilities for Physically Challenged Students (PCS): 20 marks • PCS = 20 marks, if the Institute provides full facilities for physically challenged students, as outlined. Else, in proportion to facilities. • Basis: Verifiable Responses to Questions. • Primary Data: To be provided in a prescribed format.
  • 24. 5. Perception (PR) – 100 marks • Ranking weight: 0.1 • Overall Assessment Metric: PR = 100 • Component metrics are explained in the following pages: A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peers: (PR)
  • 25. A. Peer Perception: Employers & Academic Peer (PR) : 100 marks • This is to be done through a survey conducted over a large category of Employers, Professionals from Reputed Organizations and a large category of academics to ascertain their preference for graduates of different institutions. • Comprehensive list will be prepared taking into account various sectors, regions, etc. • Lists to be updated periodically.