SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds
During the period from October 29 to November 4, 2023, three teachers of
the 2nd Geniko Lykeio Echedorou attended a seminar, entitled INCLUSIVE
EDUCATION-Increase participation in Learning of Students with Different
Backgrounds, in Malaga, Spain, organized by the provider of adult education
courses
Plus Project European Academy.
The move took place within the framework of the approved European
program Erasmus+ KA1 Learning Mobility of Individuals entitled: "Working
with learners from vulnerable backgrounds" and code: "2022-1-EL01-KA122-
SCH-000076316".
The seminar was attended by colleagues
from schools in Portugal and Ireland, with
whom we collaborated in mixed groups
to create, design, execute the activities
that accompanied the program but also
to get to know each other, to exchange
views on the "ideal" classroom, on the
educational systems of our countries, on
the methods not only of teaching but also
of managing diverse groups of students
within the framework of inclusive school.
Through games, discussions and research, we became students, we remembered
the difference between equality, equity, justice, we recognized behaviors and
mistakes, we became psychologists, we received criticism, we recognized in the
seminar class our own true class, with different cultures and habits, different
backgrounds and experiences.
We tried to find those elements that we can incorporate into our teaching in
order to come closer to our students, to offer them the right to "belong", to
open wide doors, minds and hearts, not only theirs but also ours, to accept the
different, to listen to their pulse, To cultivate the idea of inclusion and create
the atmosphere that will frame the classroom so that it is a space of real
expression and creation.
Our trainer, Sara Galvez, quickly caught the
pulse of the participants, respected the
differences in our character and culture and
effortlessly created the conditions for us all to
work together, gave us space for expression,
listened to our objections,
She sensed our difficulties and adapted her
suggestions to cover the fields we were
interested in and to offer us a variety of tools
that made the seminar more interesting but
also that could be applied in the classroom.
The activities included research, theatrical play, dramatization, writing,
imagination, discussion and took place indoors and outdoors.
Through a game we got to know each other, saying two things we like
or are good at. We glued them to a designed jar on the board. So each
of us knew that if we needed something we would find it in the face of
someone in the group. We did the same another day with two things
that bother or upset us in our daily routine.
In the classroom it can be
applied in the first days of
school
year, anonymously.
Sometimes we express
ourselves more easily
when we don't need to say
who we are.
Students can find
similarities with others and
respect their differences.
We wrote what we expect from this seminar, one group
completed the other, explained expectations, expressed
hopes, jotted down words or sentences,
We discussed and thus began the cycle of meetings with the
clarification of the words: exclusion, separation, integration,
inclusion.
We did research, we found historical data on inclusion in
education, we saw with sadness how mean we can be facing the
“different”, how few opportunities we give to those who are not
the same with us, but we also saw slow but steady steps towards
acceptance and equality.
We've built our life cycles, cycles of things we can or can't control, things that
stress us but they shouldn't, that make us feel responsible or guilty but they
don't depend on us.
We've learned how a word, a behavior can affect the whole group, learning
path, relationships or mood, but it's up to us to decide what to let affect us.
We let the burdens of those we cannot control go away from us.
Armed with colorful papers, markers and our mobile phones, we became
children around a core, that of thirst for learning, which eliminated our
differences, gave us the opportunity to laugh, to cheat, to talk about our
daily habbits, about our lives, dreams and fears, without criticism and
without right or wrong.
We went out under the sun, closed our eyes and trusted our partner who led
our steps on the sand by the sea, we collected shells that we brought back as
souvenirs from our trainer.
We photographed the works of a museum of modern art that caused us
disparate emotions, tasted traditional dishes and got to know the everyday
life of the city that hosted us.
We created videos with approaches of different behavior, we became
aggressive, defensive, assertive, we recognized these different types
We have admitted that many times we become what we do not want.
We painted the "ideal" class, we saw with melancholy how far it
is from reality, but we got ideas on how we can put small
touches so that we have around us something different from
the monotonous pattern of the room.
Just as every coin has two sides, every story can be told "differently" and we
tried this by mixing empathy with laughter.
We took the side of "evil",
we fervently defended how
self-evident it was because
of its nature, or we
remained indifferent to the
reprehensible acts simply
because we took
advantage of the
"news" for personal
promotion and viewership.
We shared roles, recognized a situation and made decisions, justified
them subjectively and listened to all opinions even of those we did not
need. The majority decided, even if some disagreed.
Teacher Psychologist Nurse Youtuber Translator
Nini Principal Janitor Charwoman Cook
Soldier Deaf student
Senegal
student
(don´t speak your
language)
Sahara
student
(don´t speak your
language)
IT
Mayor
Aspergers
tudent
Grandma
House
keeper
Shopkeeper
Priest Sheperd Taxi driver Farmer Ezgi
Divided into pairs, we listened for ten minutes without talking. We let
our partner say what they wanted without interrupting them. Who could
imagine how hard it is to listen? And yet, we wondered, do we do this in
class? Can we listen to our students without interfering? Can we just not
take advantage of our position;
We matched colors to situations and emotions. We saw how different
and how similar we can be and feel.
We shared a true dream and others in turn completed it, gave a solution,
changed it, destroyed it, completed it. We learned that you can get help from
where you least imagine, that a problem can be solved if we share it, or that we
can simply help someone in need.
We titled photos from real life. We tried to guess what they think, what the
people in pictured are. At what stage of their life? Can we understand from
the attitude of our students what lies behind an apathetic look or a smile?
Can we overcome prejudices and feel what lies behind each face?
We designed something simple and instructed the other person to draw it
using only simple commands, without telling them what it is. We tried to
be clear by using clear instructions on how to move the hand or using
other shapes. Do others understand what we say or want, without saying
it exactly? Do we lead them correctly to find it?
We wrote as many words as we could about a popular destination and then
canceled the use of those words and tried to advertise it, to make a spot that
refers to it without saying its name. Can we express ourselves when some
words are forbidden or if for some reason we cannot express them? How do we
let others know what we feel when we have we run out of words?
Travel agency
We met a gifted student, he talked to us about the boredom caused by
the class, about his indifference to certain subjects, about his conflicts
with some teachers and about his decision to study what really
interested him. They are the other side of the classroom, the children
who we cannot know if they understand us, if they listen to us, if they
doubt us and if they need what we teach them.
Differentiated teaching is very difficult to implement in the classroom
and yet along with differentiated assessment are the basics that a
prospective teacher should learn, because there are no identical
students in learning. The levelling of students, with the horizontal
application of learning processes, leaves behind both students and
teachers unsatisfied.
These were more or less the activities of the seminar, very interesting,
lively, targeted, a kind that leave something floating in the mind, a will for
something more, a mood for change, a play in thought and a sweet
nostalgia for our school years
We closed the seminar with a graduation ceremony, happy, moved, having a
clear idea of whether it changed us, complemented us, opened up paths for
us or simply confirmed us. In any case, it was a special experience that left
each of us with different mementos. Isn't that the basic principle of inclusion
after all?
Of course, we got to know Malaga and other cities, as tourists, but with an
appetite to see, taste, feel something more. The sun, the green, the old and
the new harmoniously tied us together compensated and unloaded us daily
from the thoughts of the seminar.
english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122  2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx
english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122  2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx
english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122  2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx
english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122  2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx
How many things can one do in a week? How much can we learn? How many
can we see? The truth is … it's never enough.
But every time is a start, as long as we are open to the idea that we are also
students.
"It's impossible for a person to learn what he thinks he already knows." Epictetus
Thank you

More Related Content

PPT
Ip Codime 08 Methodics
PDF
Broszura_(Dis)advantaged - equalizing opportunities
DOCX
Boys and literacy (1)
DOCX
Educator vs
DOCX
Text of the speech of Professor R.K. Singh as Chief Guest
PPT
UNITED IN DIVERSITY ROMANIA - online seminar
DOCX
HPP Reggio Approach
DOCX
Guide e book "look me in the eyes i love you"
Ip Codime 08 Methodics
Broszura_(Dis)advantaged - equalizing opportunities
Boys and literacy (1)
Educator vs
Text of the speech of Professor R.K. Singh as Chief Guest
UNITED IN DIVERSITY ROMANIA - online seminar
HPP Reggio Approach
Guide e book "look me in the eyes i love you"

Similar to english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122 2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx (19)

DOCX
The differences between young, teenage and adult learners
PPT
Ind eng-046-ppt
DOC
In Their Eyes By Lucy Crichton
PDF
How Long Is A 2500 Word Essay Double Spaced
PPT
Ind eng-644-ppt
PPT
Ind eng-387-ppt
DOCX
FIELD STUDY 1-EPISODE 2
PPT
PPTX
Choice project
PPTX
Choice project
PDF
BCPTA Oct 16
PPT
Past perceptions
PPTX
Choice project
PPTX
Creativity workshop for teachers
PPT
Ip Co Di Me 08 Statements
 
PDF
UDGAM MATTERS JULY 2016
PDF
DOCX
Ama midtern test speaking topic
DOCX
Third teachingreport dlcbelen
The differences between young, teenage and adult learners
Ind eng-046-ppt
In Their Eyes By Lucy Crichton
How Long Is A 2500 Word Essay Double Spaced
Ind eng-644-ppt
Ind eng-387-ppt
FIELD STUDY 1-EPISODE 2
Choice project
Choice project
BCPTA Oct 16
Past perceptions
Choice project
Creativity workshop for teachers
Ip Co Di Me 08 Statements
 
UDGAM MATTERS JULY 2016
Ama midtern test speaking topic
Third teachingreport dlcbelen
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
PDF
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
PPTX
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PPTX
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
PDF
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
PDF
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
master seminar digital applications in india
PDF
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
PDF
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
PPTX
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
PDF
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
PDF
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Computing-Curriculum for Schools in Ghana
Classroom Observation Tools for Teachers
Microbial diseases, their pathogenesis and prophylaxis
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
Final Presentation General Medicine 03-08-2024.pptx
Microbial disease of the cardiovascular and lymphatic systems
LNK 2025 (2).pdf MWEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHEHE
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
master seminar digital applications in india
RMMM.pdf make it easy to upload and study
Chapter 2 Heredity, Prenatal Development, and Birth.pdf
Orientation - ARALprogram of Deped to the Parents.pptx
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Anesthesia in Laparoscopic Surgery in India
Black Hat USA 2025 - Micro ICS Summit - ICS/OT Threat Landscape
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
Supply Chain Operations Speaking Notes -ICLT Program
STATICS OF THE RIGID BODIES Hibbelers.pdf
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access Surgery at WLH
Ad

english-ERASMUS ΚΑ122 2ο ΓΕΛ ΕΧΕΔΩΡΟΥ Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds.ppsx

  • 1. Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds During the period from October 29 to November 4, 2023, three teachers of the 2nd Geniko Lykeio Echedorou attended a seminar, entitled INCLUSIVE EDUCATION-Increase participation in Learning of Students with Different Backgrounds, in Malaga, Spain, organized by the provider of adult education courses Plus Project European Academy. The move took place within the framework of the approved European program Erasmus+ KA1 Learning Mobility of Individuals entitled: "Working with learners from vulnerable backgrounds" and code: "2022-1-EL01-KA122- SCH-000076316".
  • 2. The seminar was attended by colleagues from schools in Portugal and Ireland, with whom we collaborated in mixed groups to create, design, execute the activities that accompanied the program but also to get to know each other, to exchange views on the "ideal" classroom, on the educational systems of our countries, on the methods not only of teaching but also of managing diverse groups of students within the framework of inclusive school.
  • 3. Through games, discussions and research, we became students, we remembered the difference between equality, equity, justice, we recognized behaviors and mistakes, we became psychologists, we received criticism, we recognized in the seminar class our own true class, with different cultures and habits, different backgrounds and experiences.
  • 4. We tried to find those elements that we can incorporate into our teaching in order to come closer to our students, to offer them the right to "belong", to open wide doors, minds and hearts, not only theirs but also ours, to accept the different, to listen to their pulse, To cultivate the idea of inclusion and create the atmosphere that will frame the classroom so that it is a space of real expression and creation.
  • 5. Our trainer, Sara Galvez, quickly caught the pulse of the participants, respected the differences in our character and culture and effortlessly created the conditions for us all to work together, gave us space for expression, listened to our objections, She sensed our difficulties and adapted her suggestions to cover the fields we were interested in and to offer us a variety of tools that made the seminar more interesting but also that could be applied in the classroom.
  • 6. The activities included research, theatrical play, dramatization, writing, imagination, discussion and took place indoors and outdoors.
  • 7. Through a game we got to know each other, saying two things we like or are good at. We glued them to a designed jar on the board. So each of us knew that if we needed something we would find it in the face of someone in the group. We did the same another day with two things that bother or upset us in our daily routine. In the classroom it can be applied in the first days of school year, anonymously. Sometimes we express ourselves more easily when we don't need to say who we are. Students can find similarities with others and respect their differences.
  • 8. We wrote what we expect from this seminar, one group completed the other, explained expectations, expressed hopes, jotted down words or sentences, We discussed and thus began the cycle of meetings with the clarification of the words: exclusion, separation, integration, inclusion.
  • 9. We did research, we found historical data on inclusion in education, we saw with sadness how mean we can be facing the “different”, how few opportunities we give to those who are not the same with us, but we also saw slow but steady steps towards acceptance and equality.
  • 10. We've built our life cycles, cycles of things we can or can't control, things that stress us but they shouldn't, that make us feel responsible or guilty but they don't depend on us. We've learned how a word, a behavior can affect the whole group, learning path, relationships or mood, but it's up to us to decide what to let affect us. We let the burdens of those we cannot control go away from us.
  • 11. Armed with colorful papers, markers and our mobile phones, we became children around a core, that of thirst for learning, which eliminated our differences, gave us the opportunity to laugh, to cheat, to talk about our daily habbits, about our lives, dreams and fears, without criticism and without right or wrong.
  • 12. We went out under the sun, closed our eyes and trusted our partner who led our steps on the sand by the sea, we collected shells that we brought back as souvenirs from our trainer.
  • 13. We photographed the works of a museum of modern art that caused us disparate emotions, tasted traditional dishes and got to know the everyday life of the city that hosted us.
  • 14. We created videos with approaches of different behavior, we became aggressive, defensive, assertive, we recognized these different types We have admitted that many times we become what we do not want.
  • 15. We painted the "ideal" class, we saw with melancholy how far it is from reality, but we got ideas on how we can put small touches so that we have around us something different from the monotonous pattern of the room.
  • 16. Just as every coin has two sides, every story can be told "differently" and we tried this by mixing empathy with laughter. We took the side of "evil", we fervently defended how self-evident it was because of its nature, or we remained indifferent to the reprehensible acts simply because we took advantage of the "news" for personal promotion and viewership.
  • 17. We shared roles, recognized a situation and made decisions, justified them subjectively and listened to all opinions even of those we did not need. The majority decided, even if some disagreed. Teacher Psychologist Nurse Youtuber Translator Nini Principal Janitor Charwoman Cook Soldier Deaf student Senegal student (don´t speak your language) Sahara student (don´t speak your language) IT Mayor Aspergers tudent Grandma House keeper Shopkeeper Priest Sheperd Taxi driver Farmer Ezgi
  • 18. Divided into pairs, we listened for ten minutes without talking. We let our partner say what they wanted without interrupting them. Who could imagine how hard it is to listen? And yet, we wondered, do we do this in class? Can we listen to our students without interfering? Can we just not take advantage of our position;
  • 19. We matched colors to situations and emotions. We saw how different and how similar we can be and feel.
  • 20. We shared a true dream and others in turn completed it, gave a solution, changed it, destroyed it, completed it. We learned that you can get help from where you least imagine, that a problem can be solved if we share it, or that we can simply help someone in need.
  • 21. We titled photos from real life. We tried to guess what they think, what the people in pictured are. At what stage of their life? Can we understand from the attitude of our students what lies behind an apathetic look or a smile? Can we overcome prejudices and feel what lies behind each face?
  • 22. We designed something simple and instructed the other person to draw it using only simple commands, without telling them what it is. We tried to be clear by using clear instructions on how to move the hand or using other shapes. Do others understand what we say or want, without saying it exactly? Do we lead them correctly to find it?
  • 23. We wrote as many words as we could about a popular destination and then canceled the use of those words and tried to advertise it, to make a spot that refers to it without saying its name. Can we express ourselves when some words are forbidden or if for some reason we cannot express them? How do we let others know what we feel when we have we run out of words? Travel agency
  • 24. We met a gifted student, he talked to us about the boredom caused by the class, about his indifference to certain subjects, about his conflicts with some teachers and about his decision to study what really interested him. They are the other side of the classroom, the children who we cannot know if they understand us, if they listen to us, if they doubt us and if they need what we teach them.
  • 25. Differentiated teaching is very difficult to implement in the classroom and yet along with differentiated assessment are the basics that a prospective teacher should learn, because there are no identical students in learning. The levelling of students, with the horizontal application of learning processes, leaves behind both students and teachers unsatisfied.
  • 26. These were more or less the activities of the seminar, very interesting, lively, targeted, a kind that leave something floating in the mind, a will for something more, a mood for change, a play in thought and a sweet nostalgia for our school years
  • 27. We closed the seminar with a graduation ceremony, happy, moved, having a clear idea of whether it changed us, complemented us, opened up paths for us or simply confirmed us. In any case, it was a special experience that left each of us with different mementos. Isn't that the basic principle of inclusion after all?
  • 28. Of course, we got to know Malaga and other cities, as tourists, but with an appetite to see, taste, feel something more. The sun, the green, the old and the new harmoniously tied us together compensated and unloaded us daily from the thoughts of the seminar.
  • 33. How many things can one do in a week? How much can we learn? How many can we see? The truth is … it's never enough. But every time is a start, as long as we are open to the idea that we are also students. "It's impossible for a person to learn what he thinks he already knows." Epictetus Thank you