SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Evaluation in
Evaluation in
Physical Education
Physical Education
Who/What Needs
Who/What Needs
Evaluation?
Evaluation?
 Students
Students
 Personnel and
Personnel and Administrators
Administrators
 Equipment and Facilities
Equipment and Facilities
 Program
Program
Student Evaluation
Student Evaluation
 Addressed in Evaluation in PE (PE 305)
 What should students know and be able to
do?
 Sample assessments available online from
a host of sources. Among them:
 http://www.ccsu.edu/physedhltfit/faculty/cumm
iskey/assessment/assessment.html
Student Evaluation
Student Evaluation
 What students should know and be able to
do is laid out in the CT standards?
 What are they?
 Assessments should be aligned with the CT
standards
 DO NOT base assessment on participation
and effort
 Base assessment on LEARNING!
 Assessments don’t need to be painful
Student Evaluation
Student Evaluation
 Identify student strengths and weaknesses
 Inform teaching and curricular change
 Motivate and/or challenge students
 Keep students on task
 Determine entry skill level
 Determine grades or level of performance
 Identify achievement of state/national standards
 Communicate with parents/guardians
 Demonstrate learning as a result of instruction
Who/What Needs
Who/What Needs
Evaluation?
Evaluation?
 Students
Students
 Personnel and Administrators
Personnel and Administrators
 Equipment and Facilities
Equipment and Facilities
 Program
Program
Observing Personnel
Observing Personnel
 Teachers
 Observing personnel is different from
evaluating personnel. Being observed by a
colleague may be a bit discomforting but it
genuinely improves the quality of instruction
 Good PE programs typically have a system
for observing one another
Observing Personnel
Observing Personnel
 What kind of observations would you use
in order to improve the quality of
instruction?
Observing Personnel
Observing Personnel
 Peer Observations (not evaluations)
 As a department chair or program
coordinator, require X number of peer
evaluations per year. Completed ones
will be stored
 Teaching Observation-Generic
 Sample
 Create your own
 Good start would be the CCSU Student
Teaching Final Evaluation
Evaluating Personnel
Evaluating Personnel
 Evaluations procedures are laid out in
teacher contracts and are typically negotiated
by the union. They are stored in your folder
in the personnel office
 Examples for teachers
 Southington evaluation manual
 Southington teacher eval documents
 Teaching Observation-Elem PE
 Create your own
 Good start would be the CCSU Student Teaching Final Evaluation
 Evaluating coaches
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
If you are program coordinator or
department chair, your responsibilities
may include evaluating teachers. The
steps are as follows
1. Determine what to evaluate
2. Choose or construct an instrument
3. Use the instrument to record the information
4. Evaluate or interpret the data
5. Make changes and reevaluate
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
1. Determine what to evaluate
 Names, feedback, interactions with students,
class atmosphere, student-student
interactions, time spent in various aspects of
the lesson, overall observations
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
2. Choose or construct an instrument
 Types: event recording (something happens), student
evaluation of teacher, peer evaluation, time analysis,
spot checking
 Event recording
 Interaction analysis (student teaching)
 Time or duration analysis
 ALTPE – Academic Learning Time in PE (ST)
 Can also be done as a group sample
 Student evaluation
 Conclusion of Dr. C’s courses
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
2. Choose or construct an instrument
 Homemade (aka department created) observations
 Example from PE 406
 CCSU student teaching evaluation
 Samples of evaluation from textbook
 1, 2, 3
 Many others available on the internet for free
 Great resource:
 Anderson, W. G. (1980). Analysis of teaching physical
education. St. Louis: Mosby Co.
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
Steps in Teacher Evaluation
3. Use the instrument to record the
information
4. Evaluate or interpret the data
 Schedule a consultation with the reviewer or
leave in their mailbox
5. Make changes and reevaluate
 Can require teachers to submit a written
reflection and possibly an action plan for
change
 To conclude this section, an emphasis on
the point that non-administrative
evaluation of teachers by a department
chair, program coordinator, or informally
by a colleague, is essential to quality
instruction.
 We all need feedback. In fact, good teachers
SEEK OUT feedback and incorporate the
findings.
Who/What Needs
Who/What Needs
Evaluation?
Evaluation?
 Students
Students
 Personnel and
Personnel and Administrators
Administrators
 Equipment and Facilities
Equipment and Facilities
 Program
Program
Equipment and Facilities
Equipment and Facilities
 American Society for Testing and Material
s
(ASTM)
 National Operating Committee on Standar
ds for Athletic Equipment
(NOCSAE)
 National Federation of State High School
Association
(NFHS)
Who/What Needs
Who/What Needs
Evaluation?
Evaluation?
 Students
Students
 Personnel and
Personnel and Administrators
Administrators
 Equipment and Facilities
Equipment and Facilities
 Program
Program
 Your Thoughts
 What are some ways of evaluating a PE
program and curriculum?
Program & Teacher Evaluation
Program Evaluation
Program Evaluation
 CDC
 Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool
 http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/physicalactivity/
 Based on NASPE standards, developed by CDC in partnership with
experts
 Components of a Quality Program
 Developed by you
 CDC Guidelines for Promoting Physical Activity Among Y
outh
 Original Source:
http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046823.htm
Indicators of Quality
Indicators of Quality
Instruction
Instruction
 NASPE materials
 NASPE PE teacher evaluation tool
 Parents – Rate Your PE Program
 CT Teacher Inventory (non-discipline specific)
 Appropriate Practices
 Elementary
 Middle
 High School
Program and Teacher
Program and Teacher
Evaluation
Evaluation
- Indirect Measures
- Indirect Measures
 Attendance, dress, and participation
 If more than a couple students are continually sitting
out, the program is not meeting student needs.
 “Kids” will tell you if your program stinks
 After school program participation
 Non-school physical activity
 Difficult to measure
 Remember, physical activity declines markedly from
middle school until the end of high school
 Enrollment in elective classes
Program and Teacher
Program and Teacher
Evaluation
Evaluation
-
- Student Fitness Levels
Student Fitness Levels
 Many schools choose to focus on
 Cognitive: Students create personal fitness plans
 Fitness scores: Based upon improvement or raw score
 Some teachers object to assessing fitness scores due to innate differences
between students. However, there are innate differences between
students in math, writing, and other subjects, yet those teachers assess as
a way to motivate and gauge student learning and program effectiveness.
 Caution about
 Expecting all students to achieve a certain level
 Setting unrealistic criteria for particular tests (e.g., a 6-minute mile)
 My suggestion would be to use the Fitnessgram Cardiovascular Assessment
(PACER test) as opposed to the mile-run.
 Don’t go crazy on building fitness in class, teach them how to be fit!
Program and Teacher
Program and Teacher
Evaluation
Evaluation
-
- NASPE STARS
NASPE STARS
 Time
 Teacher
 Qualifications
 Professional development
 Professional involvement
 Student ratio
 Student health and safety
 Facilities and equipment
 Program mission
 Curriculum
 Instructional practices
 Student assessment
 Inclusion
 Communication
 Program evaluation
http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/stars/index.html
Program and Teacher
Program and Teacher
Evaluation
Evaluation
-
- Student Feedback
Student Feedback
 Create a survey asking students about the
effectiveness of the PE program.
Evaluation Summary
Evaluation Summary
 Utilize tools such as effective practices, PECAT,
CT inventory, and NASPE PE teacher evaluation
to determine program quality
 Good evaluation
 Informs programmatic change
 Occurs on a regular basis
 Is planned
 Is based on multiple data sources
 Data should inform decision (evidence based
practice)
Health Education
Health Education
You may be
asked to
coordinate your
school’s
wellness
program
• Required by
federal law:
Nutrition and
WIC.
Reauthorizatio
n. Act of 2004
Health Education
Health Education
Diverse Topics
Diverse Topics
 Health Education Topics
Health Education Topics
 Continued
Continued

More Related Content

PPTX
T - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
PPT
APP in Geography
PPT
INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT
PPTX
Assessment & Evaluation
PDF
Test Development and Evaluation
DOCX
construction and administration of unit test in science subject
PDF
B 190313162555
PDF
teaching material
T - Test, Measurement and Evaluation
APP in Geography
INTRODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT
Assessment & Evaluation
Test Development and Evaluation
construction and administration of unit test in science subject
B 190313162555
teaching material

Similar to Evaluation Methods in Physical Education (20)

PDF
“Performance Analytics and Assessment for Learning” - Edu 3.4
PPTX
Educational assessment
PPT
"CMC Moving Ahead": Assessment In-Service 2010
 
PPTX
CQI through assessing LO
DOCX
Report 5
PPTX
Unit 7 HIGHER EDUCATION CODE 8625
PPTX
ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION-8625
PPTX
factorsinconstructingevaluativeinstruments-210427040718.pptx
PPT
Aligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
PDF
K to 12 classroom assessment ppt
DOC
Assessment, recording, reporting policy
PPT
Understanding Assessment
PPTX
National university assessment process
DOCX
Objective and subjective performance measures
PPT
36_econtent _unit 1 it is the strangeness of learning
PPTX
Evaluation Performance Measurement and Assessment 1
PPTX
Evaluation / Performance Measurement and Assessment
PPTX
Evaluation performance Measurement and Assessment
PPT
Appendix 4 Quality Of Assessment Practices Presentation
PPTX
Assessment of learning 1
“Performance Analytics and Assessment for Learning” - Edu 3.4
Educational assessment
"CMC Moving Ahead": Assessment In-Service 2010
 
CQI through assessing LO
Report 5
Unit 7 HIGHER EDUCATION CODE 8625
ASSESSMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION-8625
factorsinconstructingevaluativeinstruments-210427040718.pptx
Aligning Assessments to Course Outcomes
K to 12 classroom assessment ppt
Assessment, recording, reporting policy
Understanding Assessment
National university assessment process
Objective and subjective performance measures
36_econtent _unit 1 it is the strangeness of learning
Evaluation Performance Measurement and Assessment 1
Evaluation / Performance Measurement and Assessment
Evaluation performance Measurement and Assessment
Appendix 4 Quality Of Assessment Practices Presentation
Assessment of learning 1
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PPTX
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PPTX
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PDF
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PPTX
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
PDF
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
FORM 1 BIOLOGY MIND MAPS and their schemes
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
20th Century Theater, Methods, History.pptx
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
Unit 4 Computer Architecture Multicore Processor.pptx
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
RTP_AR_KS1_Tutor's Guide_English [FOR REPRODUCTION].pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
Computer Architecture Input Output Memory.pptx
Practical Manual AGRO-233 Principles and Practices of Natural Farming
Ad

Evaluation Methods in Physical Education

  • 1. Evaluation in Evaluation in Physical Education Physical Education
  • 2. Who/What Needs Who/What Needs Evaluation? Evaluation?  Students Students  Personnel and Personnel and Administrators Administrators  Equipment and Facilities Equipment and Facilities  Program Program
  • 3. Student Evaluation Student Evaluation  Addressed in Evaluation in PE (PE 305)  What should students know and be able to do?  Sample assessments available online from a host of sources. Among them:  http://www.ccsu.edu/physedhltfit/faculty/cumm iskey/assessment/assessment.html
  • 4. Student Evaluation Student Evaluation  What students should know and be able to do is laid out in the CT standards?  What are they?  Assessments should be aligned with the CT standards  DO NOT base assessment on participation and effort  Base assessment on LEARNING!  Assessments don’t need to be painful
  • 5. Student Evaluation Student Evaluation  Identify student strengths and weaknesses  Inform teaching and curricular change  Motivate and/or challenge students  Keep students on task  Determine entry skill level  Determine grades or level of performance  Identify achievement of state/national standards  Communicate with parents/guardians  Demonstrate learning as a result of instruction
  • 6. Who/What Needs Who/What Needs Evaluation? Evaluation?  Students Students  Personnel and Administrators Personnel and Administrators  Equipment and Facilities Equipment and Facilities  Program Program
  • 7. Observing Personnel Observing Personnel  Teachers  Observing personnel is different from evaluating personnel. Being observed by a colleague may be a bit discomforting but it genuinely improves the quality of instruction  Good PE programs typically have a system for observing one another
  • 8. Observing Personnel Observing Personnel  What kind of observations would you use in order to improve the quality of instruction?
  • 9. Observing Personnel Observing Personnel  Peer Observations (not evaluations)  As a department chair or program coordinator, require X number of peer evaluations per year. Completed ones will be stored  Teaching Observation-Generic  Sample  Create your own  Good start would be the CCSU Student Teaching Final Evaluation
  • 10. Evaluating Personnel Evaluating Personnel  Evaluations procedures are laid out in teacher contracts and are typically negotiated by the union. They are stored in your folder in the personnel office  Examples for teachers  Southington evaluation manual  Southington teacher eval documents  Teaching Observation-Elem PE  Create your own  Good start would be the CCSU Student Teaching Final Evaluation  Evaluating coaches
  • 11. Steps in Teacher Evaluation Steps in Teacher Evaluation If you are program coordinator or department chair, your responsibilities may include evaluating teachers. The steps are as follows 1. Determine what to evaluate 2. Choose or construct an instrument 3. Use the instrument to record the information 4. Evaluate or interpret the data 5. Make changes and reevaluate
  • 12. Steps in Teacher Evaluation Steps in Teacher Evaluation 1. Determine what to evaluate  Names, feedback, interactions with students, class atmosphere, student-student interactions, time spent in various aspects of the lesson, overall observations
  • 13. Steps in Teacher Evaluation Steps in Teacher Evaluation 2. Choose or construct an instrument  Types: event recording (something happens), student evaluation of teacher, peer evaluation, time analysis, spot checking  Event recording  Interaction analysis (student teaching)  Time or duration analysis  ALTPE – Academic Learning Time in PE (ST)  Can also be done as a group sample  Student evaluation  Conclusion of Dr. C’s courses
  • 14. Steps in Teacher Evaluation Steps in Teacher Evaluation 2. Choose or construct an instrument  Homemade (aka department created) observations  Example from PE 406  CCSU student teaching evaluation  Samples of evaluation from textbook  1, 2, 3  Many others available on the internet for free  Great resource:  Anderson, W. G. (1980). Analysis of teaching physical education. St. Louis: Mosby Co.
  • 15. Steps in Teacher Evaluation Steps in Teacher Evaluation 3. Use the instrument to record the information 4. Evaluate or interpret the data  Schedule a consultation with the reviewer or leave in their mailbox 5. Make changes and reevaluate  Can require teachers to submit a written reflection and possibly an action plan for change
  • 16.  To conclude this section, an emphasis on the point that non-administrative evaluation of teachers by a department chair, program coordinator, or informally by a colleague, is essential to quality instruction.  We all need feedback. In fact, good teachers SEEK OUT feedback and incorporate the findings.
  • 17. Who/What Needs Who/What Needs Evaluation? Evaluation?  Students Students  Personnel and Personnel and Administrators Administrators  Equipment and Facilities Equipment and Facilities  Program Program
  • 18. Equipment and Facilities Equipment and Facilities  American Society for Testing and Material s (ASTM)  National Operating Committee on Standar ds for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE)  National Federation of State High School Association (NFHS)
  • 19. Who/What Needs Who/What Needs Evaluation? Evaluation?  Students Students  Personnel and Personnel and Administrators Administrators  Equipment and Facilities Equipment and Facilities  Program Program
  • 20.  Your Thoughts  What are some ways of evaluating a PE program and curriculum? Program & Teacher Evaluation
  • 21. Program Evaluation Program Evaluation  CDC  Physical Education Curriculum Analysis Tool  http://www.cdc.gov/HealthyYouth/physicalactivity/  Based on NASPE standards, developed by CDC in partnership with experts  Components of a Quality Program  Developed by you  CDC Guidelines for Promoting Physical Activity Among Y outh  Original Source: http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00046823.htm
  • 22. Indicators of Quality Indicators of Quality Instruction Instruction  NASPE materials  NASPE PE teacher evaluation tool  Parents – Rate Your PE Program  CT Teacher Inventory (non-discipline specific)  Appropriate Practices  Elementary  Middle  High School
  • 23. Program and Teacher Program and Teacher Evaluation Evaluation - Indirect Measures - Indirect Measures  Attendance, dress, and participation  If more than a couple students are continually sitting out, the program is not meeting student needs.  “Kids” will tell you if your program stinks  After school program participation  Non-school physical activity  Difficult to measure  Remember, physical activity declines markedly from middle school until the end of high school  Enrollment in elective classes
  • 24. Program and Teacher Program and Teacher Evaluation Evaluation - - Student Fitness Levels Student Fitness Levels  Many schools choose to focus on  Cognitive: Students create personal fitness plans  Fitness scores: Based upon improvement or raw score  Some teachers object to assessing fitness scores due to innate differences between students. However, there are innate differences between students in math, writing, and other subjects, yet those teachers assess as a way to motivate and gauge student learning and program effectiveness.  Caution about  Expecting all students to achieve a certain level  Setting unrealistic criteria for particular tests (e.g., a 6-minute mile)  My suggestion would be to use the Fitnessgram Cardiovascular Assessment (PACER test) as opposed to the mile-run.  Don’t go crazy on building fitness in class, teach them how to be fit!
  • 25. Program and Teacher Program and Teacher Evaluation Evaluation - - NASPE STARS NASPE STARS  Time  Teacher  Qualifications  Professional development  Professional involvement  Student ratio  Student health and safety  Facilities and equipment  Program mission  Curriculum  Instructional practices  Student assessment  Inclusion  Communication  Program evaluation http://www.aahperd.org/naspe/stars/index.html
  • 26. Program and Teacher Program and Teacher Evaluation Evaluation - - Student Feedback Student Feedback  Create a survey asking students about the effectiveness of the PE program.
  • 27. Evaluation Summary Evaluation Summary  Utilize tools such as effective practices, PECAT, CT inventory, and NASPE PE teacher evaluation to determine program quality  Good evaluation  Informs programmatic change  Occurs on a regular basis  Is planned  Is based on multiple data sources  Data should inform decision (evidence based practice)
  • 28. Health Education Health Education You may be asked to coordinate your school’s wellness program • Required by federal law: Nutrition and WIC. Reauthorizatio n. Act of 2004
  • 30.  Health Education Topics Health Education Topics  Continued Continued