THE EVALUATION PROCESS
THE EVALUATION PROCESS At DMIIA, HKA evaluation refers to a daily process of gathering data and then analyzing or ordering it in such a way that the resulting information can be used to determine whether our company is achieving its stated objectives and anticipated results that will determine if planned activities are effectively being carried out. Since the HKA is the frontliner of the business, it is imperative that his essential functions are being executed at a performance level set by the company.
HOW AN HKA IS EVALUATED The evaluation process will be composed of two types: qualitative  and  quantitative .  The evaluation program will randomly select five (5) answers from the database, and will be graded by the Team Leader or by the Team Leader Apprentice through the use of the said grading metrics. The qualitative evaluation, on the other hand, will be based on the HKA’s professionalism: General Attitude, Absenteeism and Tardiness. Moreover, evaluation of every HKA will be on a daily basis and will be submitted to the Supervisor weekly. The quantitative evaluation of grades of an HKA will be based on the following metrics: Accuracy Completeness Grammar Expiration Source
THE GRADING PROCESS SCOREBOARD: Probationary (less 3 mos.) HKA Passing Rate:   80% Probationary (3 mos. or more) and Regular HKA Passing Rate:   90%
QUANTITATIVE COMPUTATION OF GRADES
Accuracy Each correct (CORCT) answer has a grade of 100% (1), excluding deductions. Each answerable (ASW) answer but an HKA sends an STB has a grade of 0. Each STB answer but an HKA does not send an STB has a grade of 0. Each incorrect STB (INSTB) answer has a grade of 0.
Completeness Each incomplete (INCPLT) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it does not contain all the necessary information. Each redundant (RDNDT) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it contains too much, unnecessary, or repeated information. Each too long (LNGTH) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it exceeds 150 characters even though the answer is answerable by less than 150 characters; or including “ MiaMia thanks you .” and exceeds 150 characters. Answers that require more than 150 characters, if checked and justified by the TL, will not be deducted any point.
Grammar Each answer that has incorrect punctuation (PNC), spelling (SPL), capitalization (CPTL), or spacing (SPC) is deducted 5% (0.05). Deduction is accumulated per instance.  Each answer that has incorrect Subject-Verb agreement (SVA), tense (TNS), or preposition (PREP) is deducted 10% (0.1). Deduction is accumulated per instance.  Each answer that has incorrect and/or no connective (CN), determiner (DT), linking verb (LV), or lacks a word (LKW) is deducted 20% (0.2). Deduction is accumulated per instance.  Each answer that has wrong word choice (WR) is deducted 30% (0.3). Deduction is accumulated per instance.
Expiration Each answer that has no expiration (NEX) when needed has a grade of 0. Each answer that has an incorrect expiration (INEX) has a grade of 0.
Source Each answer that has no source (NSRC) has a grade of 0. Each answer with incomplete source (INSRC) is deducted 50% (0.5). Meaning: If there are 2 or more sources, these URLs must be pasted in the source box, too, using semi-colon (;) in between different sources. Each answer that has an incorrect/bad source (INSRC) has a grade of 0.
REMARKS REMARKS Remarks will be provided by the Team Leader or Assistant Team Leader after the computation of grades has been done. Comments, suggestions, and even corrections will be addressed depending on the HKA’s performance.
Areas of Improvement AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT Areas of improvement will be identified by the Team Leader or Assistant Team Leader to improve the quality of answers which are being sent by HKAs. Should an HKA need assistance to improve his or her performance, the Team Leader or the Assistant Team Leader will recommend that HKA will be enrolled in the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
QUALITATIVE  COMPUTATION OF GRADES
GENERAL ATTITUDE Does an HKA complain when being tutored or corrected by the TL or TLA? Does an HKA follow instructions given by the TL or TLA? Does an HKA display rapport with his co-HKAs? Does an HKA open irrelevant websites during his work, such as youtube, messengers, friendsters, and the like? Does  an HKA make too much unnecessary noise during his shift? Does an HKA cooperate when his co-HKA needs help to answer a difficult question? Other observable attitudes will also be considered. The HKA will be evaluated qualitatively based on the following:
ABSENTEEISM / TARDINESS Does an HKA acquire absences without prior notice to his TL or TLA? Does an HKA always come in late when reporting to work? Other factors affecting attendance issues will also be considered.
The TL and TLA will submit an Attendance Report for the whole week, specifying which days an HKA is present, absent, or on day-off.
IMPACT OF EVALUATION The evaluation process will be the gauge for the total performance of an HKA. For trainees, this will be the basis for a possible probationary employment. For probationary employees, this will also be the basis for regular employment. Regular employees will still undergo daily evaluation which will be the basis for ranking. The ranking system will then give the management a concrete picture of its employees’ performance, thereby providing a criterion for important decision making.
On the other hand, if the evaluation of an HKA is below the performance level expected, he will be enrolled in enhancement or development programs such as the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and the Progressive Improvement Program (PIA).

More Related Content

PPT
Evaluation Presentation
PPTX
Credit rating transition prediction odsc 2019
PDF
USTECS71Flyer
ODP
Expiration Guidelines
ODP
Taxonomy Of Subjects
ODP
Philippine Websites
PPT
7 laboratory
PPT
15 plc control
Evaluation Presentation
Credit rating transition prediction odsc 2019
USTECS71Flyer
Expiration Guidelines
Taxonomy Of Subjects
Philippine Websites
7 laboratory
15 plc control

Similar to Evaluation Presentation (20)

ODP
Performance Evaluation Process
DOC
Ojt evaluation
PDF
Performance evaluation report template
PDF
Employee+review+template
DOCX
Your company has just announced that a new formal performance evalua.docx
PPTX
Performane evaluation and employee retention my report
PPTX
Measurement And Evaluation Techniques and methods
DOCX
Performance appraisal wording
PPT
Performance appraisal methods
PPTX
Performance appraisal
DOCX
Performance appraisal policy and procedure
PPT
Evaluation of online learning
DOCX
Identify what type of performance managementappraisal method is.docx
PPT
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
DOCX
Chief knowledge officer performance appraisal
DOCX
Performance appraisal phrase book
DOCX
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTot.docx
PDF
Performance Appraisal
PDF
Dr. Jamil 8625 Day 5.pdf
DOCX
Performance appraisal types
Performance Evaluation Process
Ojt evaluation
Performance evaluation report template
Employee+review+template
Your company has just announced that a new formal performance evalua.docx
Performane evaluation and employee retention my report
Measurement And Evaluation Techniques and methods
Performance appraisal wording
Performance appraisal methods
Performance appraisal
Performance appraisal policy and procedure
Evaluation of online learning
Identify what type of performance managementappraisal method is.docx
Performance Appraisal 03(2)
Chief knowledge officer performance appraisal
Performance appraisal phrase book
Group Member Discussion RubricStudent NameTotal Points PossibleTot.docx
Performance Appraisal
Dr. Jamil 8625 Day 5.pdf
Performance appraisal types
Ad

More from aptwano (20)

ODP
010 Verbals
ODP
3 Google Operators
ODP
7 Google Similar Pages
ODP
012 Abbreviations
ODP
011 Sentence
ODP
014 Common Errors
ODP
04 Verbs
ODP
02 Articles
ODP
013 Punctuations Capitalization Numbers
ODP
01 Nouns
ODP
Answer Formats
ODP
Taxonomy Of Inquiries
ODP
St Bs
ODP
7 Google Similar Pages
ODP
6 Google Scholar
ODP
8 Google Translate
ODP
4 Google Book
ODP
5 Google Maps
ODP
9 Google Sets
ODP
2 Hka Researching
010 Verbals
3 Google Operators
7 Google Similar Pages
012 Abbreviations
011 Sentence
014 Common Errors
04 Verbs
02 Articles
013 Punctuations Capitalization Numbers
01 Nouns
Answer Formats
Taxonomy Of Inquiries
St Bs
7 Google Similar Pages
6 Google Scholar
8 Google Translate
4 Google Book
5 Google Maps
9 Google Sets
2 Hka Researching
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
PDF
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
PPTX
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PPTX
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PPTX
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PDF
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
PDF
advance database management system book.pdf
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
A GUIDE TO GENETICS FOR UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL STUDENTS
Empowerment Technology for Senior High School Guide
B.Sc. DS Unit 2 Software Engineering.pptx
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
MBA _Common_ 2nd year Syllabus _2021-22_.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
202450812 BayCHI UCSC-SV 20250812 v17.pptx
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
CHAPTER IV. MAN AND BIOSPHERE AND ITS TOTALITY.pptx
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 1)
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
Vision Prelims GS PYQ Analysis 2011-2022 www.upscpdf.com.pdf
advance database management system book.pdf
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين

Evaluation Presentation

  • 2. THE EVALUATION PROCESS At DMIIA, HKA evaluation refers to a daily process of gathering data and then analyzing or ordering it in such a way that the resulting information can be used to determine whether our company is achieving its stated objectives and anticipated results that will determine if planned activities are effectively being carried out. Since the HKA is the frontliner of the business, it is imperative that his essential functions are being executed at a performance level set by the company.
  • 3. HOW AN HKA IS EVALUATED The evaluation process will be composed of two types: qualitative and quantitative . The evaluation program will randomly select five (5) answers from the database, and will be graded by the Team Leader or by the Team Leader Apprentice through the use of the said grading metrics. The qualitative evaluation, on the other hand, will be based on the HKA’s professionalism: General Attitude, Absenteeism and Tardiness. Moreover, evaluation of every HKA will be on a daily basis and will be submitted to the Supervisor weekly. The quantitative evaluation of grades of an HKA will be based on the following metrics: Accuracy Completeness Grammar Expiration Source
  • 4. THE GRADING PROCESS SCOREBOARD: Probationary (less 3 mos.) HKA Passing Rate: 80% Probationary (3 mos. or more) and Regular HKA Passing Rate: 90%
  • 6. Accuracy Each correct (CORCT) answer has a grade of 100% (1), excluding deductions. Each answerable (ASW) answer but an HKA sends an STB has a grade of 0. Each STB answer but an HKA does not send an STB has a grade of 0. Each incorrect STB (INSTB) answer has a grade of 0.
  • 7. Completeness Each incomplete (INCPLT) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it does not contain all the necessary information. Each redundant (RDNDT) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it contains too much, unnecessary, or repeated information. Each too long (LNGTH) answer is deducted 50% (0.5) when it exceeds 150 characters even though the answer is answerable by less than 150 characters; or including “ MiaMia thanks you .” and exceeds 150 characters. Answers that require more than 150 characters, if checked and justified by the TL, will not be deducted any point.
  • 8. Grammar Each answer that has incorrect punctuation (PNC), spelling (SPL), capitalization (CPTL), or spacing (SPC) is deducted 5% (0.05). Deduction is accumulated per instance. Each answer that has incorrect Subject-Verb agreement (SVA), tense (TNS), or preposition (PREP) is deducted 10% (0.1). Deduction is accumulated per instance. Each answer that has incorrect and/or no connective (CN), determiner (DT), linking verb (LV), or lacks a word (LKW) is deducted 20% (0.2). Deduction is accumulated per instance. Each answer that has wrong word choice (WR) is deducted 30% (0.3). Deduction is accumulated per instance.
  • 9. Expiration Each answer that has no expiration (NEX) when needed has a grade of 0. Each answer that has an incorrect expiration (INEX) has a grade of 0.
  • 10. Source Each answer that has no source (NSRC) has a grade of 0. Each answer with incomplete source (INSRC) is deducted 50% (0.5). Meaning: If there are 2 or more sources, these URLs must be pasted in the source box, too, using semi-colon (;) in between different sources. Each answer that has an incorrect/bad source (INSRC) has a grade of 0.
  • 11. REMARKS REMARKS Remarks will be provided by the Team Leader or Assistant Team Leader after the computation of grades has been done. Comments, suggestions, and even corrections will be addressed depending on the HKA’s performance.
  • 12. Areas of Improvement AREAS OF IMPROVEMENT Areas of improvement will be identified by the Team Leader or Assistant Team Leader to improve the quality of answers which are being sent by HKAs. Should an HKA need assistance to improve his or her performance, the Team Leader or the Assistant Team Leader will recommend that HKA will be enrolled in the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP).
  • 14. GENERAL ATTITUDE Does an HKA complain when being tutored or corrected by the TL or TLA? Does an HKA follow instructions given by the TL or TLA? Does an HKA display rapport with his co-HKAs? Does an HKA open irrelevant websites during his work, such as youtube, messengers, friendsters, and the like? Does an HKA make too much unnecessary noise during his shift? Does an HKA cooperate when his co-HKA needs help to answer a difficult question? Other observable attitudes will also be considered. The HKA will be evaluated qualitatively based on the following:
  • 15. ABSENTEEISM / TARDINESS Does an HKA acquire absences without prior notice to his TL or TLA? Does an HKA always come in late when reporting to work? Other factors affecting attendance issues will also be considered.
  • 16. The TL and TLA will submit an Attendance Report for the whole week, specifying which days an HKA is present, absent, or on day-off.
  • 17. IMPACT OF EVALUATION The evaluation process will be the gauge for the total performance of an HKA. For trainees, this will be the basis for a possible probationary employment. For probationary employees, this will also be the basis for regular employment. Regular employees will still undergo daily evaluation which will be the basis for ranking. The ranking system will then give the management a concrete picture of its employees’ performance, thereby providing a criterion for important decision making.
  • 18. On the other hand, if the evaluation of an HKA is below the performance level expected, he will be enrolled in enhancement or development programs such as the Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) and the Progressive Improvement Program (PIA).