Exploiting AI Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defense Mechanisms
0 likes93 views
The document discusses the vulnerabilities of AI models to adversarial attacks, highlighting their reliance on data and complex architectures. It covers different attack strategies, such as data poisoning and model extraction, and emphasizes the need for robust defense mechanisms and real-time detection tactics to mitigate these threats. The importance of developing secure AI architectures and improving model interpretability is also underscored to ensure resilience and compliance in critical applications.
Exploiting AI Models: Adversarial Attacks and Defense Mechanisms
- 1. EXPLOITING AI MODELS Adversarial Attacks and Defense Mechanisms Presented by Bryan Zarnett Chief Technology Officer at NetraScale
- 2. INTRODUCTIONS 1/12 "AI's biggest strength is also its weakest link. The smarter it gets, the more complexity that is added, the better a professional threat actor can blend in.” AGENDA Using Cyber-security Threats for Inspiration AI Vulnerabilities and Models at Risk Adversarial Attacks and Attack Models Defense Strategies and Tactics Real-world Limitations or Problems to Solve?
- 3. PERSPECTIVE 2/12 Using Cyber-security Threats for Inspiration In offensive security, we apply three points of view – yours, the opponent, and a bystander. In developing solutions with one perspective being offensive security, take into consideration…. OFFENSIVE Implementation of solutions that implement attacks in a positive manner (using skills for good versus evil) PREVENTATIVE Assurance that the fundamental and emerging attacks are not present in your solution. 3 2 DEFENSIVE Implementation of solutions that detect, deter, or respond to attacks and related activities. 1
- 4. INTRODUCTION 3/12 AI VULNERABILITIES AI models are inherently vulnerable to attacks due to their reliance on data, complex architectures, and often opaque decision-making processes. These vulnerabilities make AI systems prime targets for malicious actors who seek to manipulate outcomes, extract information, or disrupt services. Model Dependencies Complexity Increased Deployment AI models rely heavily on large volumes of data for training and refinement. Any tampering with this data (data poisoning) can degrade model performance, making AI systems prone to making incorrect or biased decisions. Many AI models, especially deep learning networks, operate as "black boxes" with limited interpretability. This opacity creates a security challenge: it’s difficult to predict how a model might respond to adversarial inputs, making it challenging to detect or mitigate potential vulnerabilities. As AI becomes more prevalent in essential systems like financial services, healthcare, and autonomous vehicles, the consequences of attacks can be severe. AI security isn’t just a technical concern but a matter of public safety, regulatory compliance, and societal trust.
- 5. INTRODUCTION 4/12 MODELS AT RISK 1 2 3 4 IMAGE CLASSIFIERS NLP MODELS REINFORCEMENT LEARNING MODELS GENERATIVE MODELS These models are often deployed in security systems (like facial recognition) and autonomous systems (such as driverless cars). However, small, carefully crafted perturbations can mislead these classifiers, causing the model to misidentify objects or people, potentially leading to severe safety risks. NLP models, used in applications like chatbots, sentiment analysis, and language translation, are vulnerable to input manipulation. Adversaries can craft textual inputs to produce biased or harmful outputs, extract confidential information, or mislead users. These models are commonly used in dynamic environments like trading systems, game AI, and robotics. Adversarial attacks on reinforcement learning can lead to suboptimal or harmful decisions. In the financial sector, this might cause a model to buy or sell assets incorrectly. Generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), produce content like images or text. These models can be attacked to create fake or misleading content, which could have severe consequences for cybersecurity and information integrity, such as generating synthetic identities for fraud.
- 6. FUNDAMENTALS 5/12 ADVERSARIAL ATTACKS Adversarial attacks are deliberate attempts to deceive, manipulate, or compromise AI models by exploiting their vulnerabilities. These attacks are designed to produce unintended behaviors in the model, often with severe implications depending on the application. Evasion Poisoning Model Extraction Attack INFERENCE PHASE TRAINING DATASET PARAMETERIZATION The attacker subtly alters the input data to deceive the model without needing access to the training data. This is particularly effective against image classification models, where small modifications to pixels can cause the model to misclassify an object, often without human detection. The attacker contaminates the training dataset, introducing incorrect or malicious data points to compromise the model’s accuracy. Poisoning can lead to long-term issues in the model, as the model will consistently exhibit biased or inaccurate behavior. Aimed at learning the internal parameters or the decision-making logic of the model. Attackers query the model multiple times to reconstruct or approximate its functionality, often with the intent of creating a similar model without needing access to the original training data or understanding the internal architecture. Example By slightly altering an image of a stop sign, attackers can cause an AI-driven vehicle’s vision system to perceive it as a yield sign Introduce biased data into a medical AI training set, causing it to misdiagnose certain diseases or recommend incorrect treatments. Use model extraction to replicate a proprietary recommendation algorithm in a financial system. This could lead to intellectual property theft and significant competitive losses for the model’s creator.
- 7. FUNDAMENTALS 6/12 ATTACK MODELS Minor, carefully crafted changes to an image could cause an image classifier to misidentify objects. In the example of the "stop sign attack," researchers modified a stop sign’s pixels in a way that was invisible to the human eye. However, this alteration caused the classifier in a self- driving car to misinterpret it as a yield or speed limit sign, creating a severe safety risk. 1 Data Poisoning Machine learning models are often used to detect fraudulent transactions. Attackers have successfully injected manipulated transactions into training datasets, causing the models to ignore specific fraudulent patterns. By poisoning the dataset, the attackers can make future fraudulent transactions less likely to trigger alerts. Model Extraction Attackers used a series of API queries to replicate a proprietary sentiment analysis model. This allowed them to create a near- identical model without investing in the original research, depriving the service provider of revenue while raising IP theft concerns. 3 Backdoor Attacks A backdoor attack was successfully embedded in a facial recognition system used for access control. By introducing specific images with subtle, repetitive patterns into the training set, attackers created a hidden trigger. When the trigger pattern (such as a unique accessory or small tattoo) was present, the system would misclassify unauthorized individuals as authorized users. 4 2 Image Alteration
- 8. IN DEFENSE 7/12 STRATEGIES Defense mechanisms aim to increase the model's resilience, detect adversarial behavior, and mitigate the effects of successful attacks. Some of the most widely adopted defense strategies include adversarial training, model robustness enhancement, and defensive distillation. Adversarial Training Exposing the model to adversarial examples during the training phase. By training on both clean and adversarial data, the model learns to recognize and resist attacks, making it more robust against similar threats. Model Robustness Building models that are less sensitive to small changes in input, making them harder to fool with adversarial examples. Robustness can be improved through regularization techniques, noise injection, or using more complex architectures that generalize better. Defensive Distillation Training a simplified "student" model to mimic the behavior of a more complex "teacher" model. The process smooths out the decision boundaries, making it harder for adversarial attacks to find precise weaknesses.
- 9. IN DEFENSE 8/12 TACTICS Tactics are the specific actions we take to implement our strategy effectively. In the context of AI, the tactics for detecting and mitigating attacks are grounded in core principles of preventative security, addressing both technical vulnerabilities in code and threats from social engineering. These approaches aim to identify unusual input patterns, assess uncertainty levels, and apply filtering techniques to reduce potential risks and improve resilience against adversarial attacks. Input Filtering Input filtering attempts to identify and block adversarial inputs before they reach the model. This is often done by scanning inputs for suspicious patterns or perturbations that deviate from normal data distributions. Filtering can be based on statistical methods, such as detecting outliers, or more advanced approaches like employing additional models trained to classify inputs as adversarial or benign. Uncertainty Assessment AI models can be equipped to assess their own uncertainty regarding specific inputs, which helps identify adversarial examples. When an input causes unusually high uncertainty, the model may flag it as suspicious. Methods like Bayesian inference or dropout- based uncertainty estimation allow models to gauge confidence levels. If an input causes high variance in predictions across multiple runs, it might be an adversarial attempt. Anomaly Detection Detection models are trained specifically to identify adversarial inputs by analyzing patterns that differ from normal behavior. Anomaly detection systems flag unusual inputs or behaviors in real-time, offering an additional layer of defense. Autoencoders, statistical outlier detection, and ensemble methods are commonly used to distinguish between benign and adversarial inputs. Detection models run alongside the primary model, filtering inputs.
- 10. FUTURE STATE 9/12 REAL WORLD LIMITATIONS “CODE” QUALITY Poorly written or inadequately tested code can introduce vulnerabilities that adversaries may exploit, leading to unexpected model behaviors or complete system compromise. MODEL INTERPRETABILITY Often compromised by defensive measures like robustness improvements or distillation. This can make it difficult for organizations to understand model decisions and adhere to regulatory requirements, PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS Stronger defenses can significantly slow down model performance, making them unsuitable for real-time or high-frequency applications. ADVANCING THREATS New adversarial techniques are developed, existing defenses may become outdated or ineffective. A successful defense strategy typically requires layered approaches that combine several techniques to create a more resilient AI system.
- 11. FUTURE STATE 10/12 REAL WORLD LIMITATIONS
- 12. FUTURE STATE 11/12 LOOKING FORWARD SECURE MODEL ARCHITECTURES AI MONITORING SYSTEMS EXPLAINABILITY Consider the following milestones in the development of your solution! These architectures integrate security measures such as adversarial robustness, encrypted computations, and privacy-preserving techniques to protect sensitive data and model integrity. These systems monitor inputs, outputs, and model decisions to detect anomalies, potential adversarial attacks, and drift in model performance. Explainability tools help uncover how models reach specific decisions, allowing organizations to understand potential vulnerabilities, biases, or unexpected behaviors.
- 13. THANK YOU 12/12