![Thank you Cheng Guo [email_address] Ehud Sharlin ehud@cpsc.ucalgary.ca](https://image.slidesharecdn.com/chipresentationver2-1208811603911899-9/85/Exploring-the-Use-of-Tangible-User-Interface-for-Human-Robot-Interaction-31-320.jpg)
Exploring the Use of Tangible User Interface for Human-Robot Interaction
- 1. Exploring the Use of Tangible User Interfaces for Human-Robot Interaction Cheng Guo Ehud Sharlin ― A Comparative Study University of Calgary
- 2. Jordà, S. et al The reacTable (2005)
- 3. Tangible User Interface (TUI) Ishii, H. and Ullmer, B. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms (1997)
- 4. Quigely, M et al. Semi-Autonomous Human-UAV Interfaces for Fixed-Wing Mini-UAVs (2004)
- 6. Gesture Interface / TUI Duality Source: http://cache.kotaku.com/assets/resources/2006/11/wii_baseball.jpeg
- 10. The Horse Rein Metaphor
- 15. Easy Trial
- 16. Hard Trial
- 17. Posture
- 18. Postures
- 19. Easy Set
- 20. Hard Set
- 22. Keypad Condition Posture Navigation
- 23. User Study 8 Participants for Pilot Study 20 Participants ( Mean = 22 yrs) 14 people either haven’t played the Wii before or played only a few times. Order: Wiimote -> Keypad (10 Participants) Keypad -> Wiimote (10 Participants)
- 24. Navigation – Task Completion Time
- 26. Posture – Task Completion Time Significant Technique X Posture Interaction The task completion time with each technique varies depending on the posture or vice versa.
- 27. Posture – Task Completion Time
- 28. Posture - Error Wiimote/Nunchuk: M = 0 vs Keypad: M = 1.5
- 30. Participants completed both tasks faster and made fewer errors with the Wiimote/Nunchuk technique Participants prefer the Wiimote/Nunchuk technique overall Summary
- 31. Thank you Cheng Guo [email_address] Ehud Sharlin ehud@cpsc.ucalgary.ca
Editor's Notes
- #2: 10.44