Fabrication of Controlled Droplet Application for Efficient use of Pesticides

International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 04 Issue: 07 | July -2017 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2017, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 5.181 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 802
Fabrication of Controlled Droplet Application for Efficient use of
Pesticides
Rakesh Nath1, Denish Sukhadiya2,Monu Ojha3, Shreya Tripathi3 Kavya Dashora4
1Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,New Delhi, India
2Department of Mechanical engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
3Research Scholar, Centre for Rural Development and Technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi,
New Delhi, India
4Asstt. Professor, Centre for rural development and technology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India
------------------------------------------------------------------------***-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Abstract: The impact of use of pesticides and agrochemicals in Indian agriculture has transformed the agricultural position of
the country from food dependent to food reliant nation. If the credits of pesticides include enhanced economic potential in
terms of increased production of food and fiber, and amelioration of vector-borne diseases, then their debits have resulted in
serious health implications to man and his environment. Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach a
destination other than their target species, because they are sprayed or spread across entire agricultural fields. The world-
wide deaths and chronic diseases due to pesticide poisoning is about 1 million per year. In this paper we have made an
attempt to reduce the runoff of pesticides into aquatic environments, other fields, grazing areas and even to human
settlements. We observed that spraying efficiency can be drastically improved by altering spraying techniques and features of
droplets of pesticides (size, speed, aiming of droplets etc.).The way it is important to use the right chemicals for agro-input; it
is equally important to have right spraying equipment and nozzle to decide the right droplet size for effective application of
chemicals.
Key words: droplet size, irrigation, spraying technique, atomizer
1. INTRODUCTION
Over the last few decades, there has been extensive research conducted to develop low cost and precision methodology and
decision support tools necessary for application of water and plant nutrients1Sprinkler irrigation is a type of irrigation water
similar to rainfall shower. Water is distributed through pipes which is then sprayed into the air through sprinklers so that it
breaks up into small water drops. Individual sprinkler flow control can be accomplished by using a series of on-off cycles or as
it has become known as ‘pulsing’ the sprinkler2. Other method for controlling irrigation water application is developed by 3. To
have an efficient and précised application of water and nutrients, it is important that the pump supply system, sprinklers and
operating conditions must be designed to enable a uniform application4. The usual method of controlling size of droplets
within fairly narrow limits is by using centrifugal-energy nozzles. The main types of centrifugal-energy nozzles are discs, cups
and cylindrical sleeves or wire mesh cages and spinning brushes. This review discusses a concept and design of controlled
droplet application (CDA), which is developed to address the need for greater efficiency when applying pesticide sprays at
ultra-low-volume rates of application.
1.1 Pesticides Application in Agriculture
Chemicals intended for managing any pest, including vectors of human or animal disease, unwanted species of plants or
animals, causing harm during or otherwise interfering with the production, processing, storage, transport, or marketing of
food, agricultural commodities, wood and wood products or animal feedstuffs, or substances that may be administered to
animals for the control of insects, arachnids, or other pests in or on their bodies are called as pesticides5.Pesticides can be
persistent, mobile and toxic in soil, water, and air and has serious impacts on humans and wildlife through the food chain.
They usually accumulate in the soil and residues reaches the surface and groundwater through leaching. Ideally a chemical
pesticide must have lethal action against the targeted pests, but not against the non-target species, including human being.
Unfortunately, this is not the case, so the controversy of use and abuse of pesticides has surfaced.

1.2Hazards of pesticides
The impact of pesticides consists of the effects of pesticides on non- target species. Pesticides are chemical preparations used
to kill fungal or animal pests. Over 98% of sprayed insecticides and 95% of herbicides reach a destination other than their
target species, because they are sprayed or spread across entire agricultural fields. Runoff can carry pesticides into aquatic
environments while wind can carry them to other fields, grazing areas, human settlements and undeveloped areas, potentially
affecting other species. Other problems emerge from poor production, transport and storage practices. Over time, repeated
application increases pest resistance, while its effects on other species can facilitate the pest's resurgence6. The World Health
Organization estimates that there are 3 million cases of pesticide poisoning each year and up to 220,000 deaths, primarily in
developing countries7.
1.3Pesticides Affect Soil Microbes
In a natural soil environment, a cooperative relationship exists between microbes and plants. Plants like grass, trees and food
crops depend on microorganisms in the soil to obtain water, soluble nutrients, protect from pests and pathogens, prevent
nutrient loss and break down compounds that could inhibit growth. The chemicals that are used to enhance plant growth can
actually destroy the soil system, killing or causing mutation pressure on the soil microbes that all other organisms in the
ecosystem need to survive. Pesticides include a large group of chemical agents that attempt to eliminate destructive biological
forces in agriculture. These include herbicides for killing plants, insecticides for killing insects, fungicides for killing fungus and
bactericides for killing bacteria. While these chemicals supposedly only target specific species, repeated use inevitably kills
microbial life that is beneficial to the soil system. Microbes that survive can be genetically altered in a way that is no longer
beneficial to the soil ecosystem and be resistant to the chemical intended to kill them. The destruction or alteration of first-
level microbes can affect the entire soil ecosystem all the way up to the largest mammalianpredators8.
Pesticide application plays an important role in pest management. Proper technique of application of pesticide and the
equipment used for applying pesticide are vital to the success of pest control operations. The application of pesticide is not
merely the operation of sprayer or duster. It has to be coupled with a thorough knowledge of the pest problem. The main
purpose of pesticide application technique is to manage the targeted species with maximum efficiency and at the same time to
keep the pest under control as well as minimum contamination of non-targets. The application techniques of such high-grade
toxic chemicals ideally should be target oriented so that safety to the non-targets and the environment is ensured. Therefore,
proper selection of application equipment, knowledge of pest behaviour and skillful dispersal methods are vital9.
2. Sprinklers
High Pressure Impact Sprinklers:
In the 1960s, the commonly used sprinklers using center pivot irrigation systems had standard high-pressure (greater than 50
pounds per square inch) impact. When the system nozzles were properly sized and pressure variation along the lateral was
within recommended limits, these sprinkler packages provided good application uniformity. During dry, windy conditions in
arid and semi-arid environments, the losses from wind drift and evaporation were very high. To address this problem ,a low
angle and low pressure (25 to 40 pounds per square inch) impact sprinklers were developed9. These were found to effectively
reduce wind drift and evaporation losses, but flow rate variation caused by undulating topography still remained a significant
problem. To manage such issues, flow control sprinkler nozzles and fixed pressure regulators were developed which reduced
the flow rate variation due to topography to within tolerable limits. As a result, reduced-pressure impact sprinklers could be
used on center pivots.
Low Pressure Impact Sprinklers
Initially, escalating energy costs made the high energy requirement of impact sprinklers a major concern among producers
and the farmers. In due course, the low-pressure spray sprinklers (less than 30 pounds per square inch) for center pivots were
also developed. They have a fixed-head and a part or full circle application pattern. A deflection plate was inserted to create
spray by deflecting the water jet exiting the nozzle. Depending upon the type of deflection plate, water forms mist-like spray or
tiny streamlets10.

Low Energy Precision Application
A low pressure application package for center pivot systems known as LEPA (Low Energy Precision Application) was
developed in the early 1980 11,12. A LEPA package has very-low-pressure (6 to 10 pounds per square inch) bubblers or furrow
drag socks suspended on drop tubes at a height of 1 to 3 feet above the soil surface and has characteristically high application
rates exceeding the water infiltration rate. Such sprinkler packages have been found to have irrigation application efficiencies
of 90 to 95 % and reduced evaporation is the key reason for the efficiency of this system11. The spray surface area is
minimized by locating the applicators very near to the soil surface or crop area.
In modern agriculture, basic sprinklers used are mainly of two types
 Spray Head
 Rotors
Figure-1:Types of basic sprinklers
Table-1: A sample Pressure Requirements for Sprinklers
Pressure Requirements for sprinklers
Pressure PSIRadius FtFlow GPM
20102.10
30122.60
The table (1) is an example of pressure requirements for sprinklers. In the given table, we can see that the considered sample
at 20 PSI this sprinkler will have a radius of 10 feet and it will consume 2.10 GPM or water flow or at 30 PSI this sprinkler will
have a radius of 12 feet and it will consume 2.60 GPM or water flow. This can be safely concluded that higher water pressure
results in a larger radius and higher flow requirement, this relationship between pressure, radius and flow is true of most
sprinklers5.
2.1 Nozzle Size:
The nozzle and its size determine the quantity of spray applied to an area, the uniformity of application, the coverage obtained
on the target surface, and the amount of potential drift. Nozzle breaks the stream of liquid into droplets, forming the spray
pattern and also the spray volume at a given operating pressure, travel speed, and spacing and are instrumental in propelling
the droplets in the desired direction13. Spray pressure and nozzle size control the drop size distribution from a sprinkler which
influences the application rate pattern. Consequently, high pressure or small nozzle sizes, which tend to produce smaller
droplets, increase application rates near the sprinkler while low pressure or large nozzle sizes producing larger droplets,
increase application rates farther from the sprinkler14.

2.2 Flow Rate
The nozzle flow-rate (Q) depends on the water pressure head, the diameter of the nozzle aperture and its friction coefficient.
Where:
Q = Nozzle flow-rate (discharge), expressed as liters per hour (l/h)
P = Water pressure head, expressed in m (meters)
D = Nozzle nominal diameter, expressed in mm
C = Friction coefficient. Its value for small nozzles, up to 5.5 mm. = 0.95.
For medium size nozzles, 5.5-8 mm. = 0.9
For large nozzles, over 8 mm. = 0.85.
The pressure dependent flow-rate for a certain nozzle is:
Where:
Q1 = The flow-rate at the P1 head.
Q2 = The flow-rate at the P2 head.
2.3 Sprinkler Droplet Kinetic Energy:
Many soils, particularly those containing significant silt fractions, are susceptible to soil-surface sealing from sprinkler droplet
impact. The force of the droplets hitting the ground breaks down the surface soil structure, forming a thin compacted layer
that greatly reduces infiltration rate10. The kinetic energy of discrete water droplets impacting a bare soil surface generally
leads to a drastic reduction in water infiltration rate due to formation of a seal on the soil surface15.
2.4 Spraying inefficiencies
In order to better understand the cause of the spray inefficiency, it is useful to reflect on the implications of the large range of
droplet sizes produced by typical (hydraulic) spray nozzles. Historically, dose-transfer to the biological target (i.e. the pest) has
been shown to be inefficient. However, relating "ideal" deposits with biological effect is fraught with difficulty, but in spite of
Hislop’s misgivings about detail, there have been several demonstrations that massive amounts of pesticides are wasted by
run-off from the crop and into the soil, in a process called endo-drift16,17. This is a less familiar form of pesticide drift, with
exon-drift causing much greater public concern. Pesticides are conventionally applied using hydraulic atomizers, either on
hand-held sprayers or tractor booms, where formulations are mixed into high volumes of water17.
Since the rate of application under low-pressure spray sprinklers can be minimized with the help of offset booms, sprinkler
selection should ideally be based on drop size distribution. The drawback with small drop sizes are though they have the least
droplet kinetic energy but are the highly susceptible to wind drift losses where as large drop sizes though have the highest
droplet kinetic energy still they are the least susceptible to wind drift losses. Sprinklers which have an average of the two
features work in most of the conditions17. This requirement is largely fulfilled by moving plate sprinklers that produces the
drops with medium sizes and maximum wetted area.

Droplet size plays a very important role in pesticide application by minimizing environmental contamination. Pesticide sprays
are generally classified according to droplet size. When drift is to be minimized, a medium or coarse spray is required
irrespective of the volume applied (Table2).
Table 2: Classification of sprays according to droplet size.
V o l u m e m e d i u m diameter of
droplet (μm) 1
Classification of droplet size
<50 Aerosol
51 - 100 Mist
101 - 2 0 0 Fine spray
201 - 4 0 0 M e d i u m spray
>400 Coarse spray
T h e most widely used parameter of droplet size is the volume medium diameter (Vmd) which is
m e a s u r e d in micrometers (μm). 1 mic = 1/1000 m m
Different droplet sizes have dramatically different dispersal characteristics, and are subject to complex macro- and micro-
climatic interactions. Greatly simplifying these interactions in terms of droplet size and wind speed, A study concluded
essentially there are three sets of conditions under which droplets move from the nozzle to the target18. These are where:
a. Sedimentation dominates: typically larger (>100 µm) droplets applied at low wind-speeds; droplets above this size
are appropriate for minimizing drift contamination by herbicides.
b. turbulent eddies dominate: typically small droplets (<50 µm) that are usually considered most appropriate for
targeting flying insects, unless an electrostatic charge is also present that provides the necessary force to attract
droplets to foliage.
c. Intermediate conditions where both sedimentation and drift effects are important. Most agricultural insecticide and
fungicide spraying is optimized by using relatively small (say 50-150 µm) droplets in order to maximize “coverage”
(droplets per unit area), but are also subject to drift19.
Pressure also has a significant effect on the required spacing. Higher pressure allows wider spacing because of the resulting
smoother application rate pattern and slight increase in the wetted area. Most spray sprinklers with low pressure results into
a do nut shaped application rate pattern. As a result, closer spacing is needed in order to maintain application uniformity. Due
to the high flow rates required on the outer portion of center pivots, large spacing require large nozzle sizes, which may result
in excessively large drops.
3. Possible Solution for Spraying Inefficiency
3.1 Controlled Droplet Application
In essence, all of these refer to droplets produced from a liquid that is fed onto a spinning disc where it moves outwards by
centrifugal force until it reaches the edge when it forms even sized droplets that are then flung off the rotating disc19.The crux
of the system is to produce small droplets of a relatively even size and with minimum spacing between droplets.
3.2 Finding Better Sprinkling Technique
a. Ideal Droplet Size
b. Plot of efficiency factor v/s wind speed

Chart 1- Plot of relative infiltration rate v/s Drop size for different Droplet Velocity
The effect of the drop size and velocity on infiltration is illustrated above with taking into account evaporation and drift of
small drops. As droplet velocity is also a function of Drop Size, the tipping point for relative infiltration rate comes for
relatively medium sized droplets with diameter around 0.6 to 1.3 mm20.
4. Concept of Atomizer Sprinkler
4.1 Atomizer:
It is a three speed spinning disc rotary atomizer designed for the Controlled Droplet Application (CDA) of sprays. By efficiently
producing only the spray droplet sizes appropriate for the particular application, significantly reduce spray volumes and costs
and minimize the risk of environmental contamination. Droplets diameter vary with rpm of Discs and it is just inversely
proportional of each other.
a. Low Speed- 200 to 500 micron spray droplets for pre-emergent and post-emergent herbicide applications where
drift avoidance is essential
b. Intermediate Speed-100 to 200 micron sprays droplets for most post-emergent herbicides, defoliants, foliar feeds
and fungicides. It ensures good coverage of plant surfaces while minimizing any risk of uncontrolled spray drift.
c. High Speed-75 to 150 micron sprays droplets for insecticides and fungicides.
The low application volumes allowed by CDA mean, larger areas can be sprayed per tank load and lighter vehicles and ATVs
can be used, offering impressive savings in terms of cost, time and effort. This both speeds up the spraying process and allows
more spraying days, thus enabling quick and cost-effective pesticide application to be undertaken when needed21.
4.2 Whole assembly which upholds Sprinkler Atomizer
a. It has basic triangular stand which holds the complete assembly.
b. The atomizer oscillates to and fro within the stand for uniform sprinkling.
c. The material used to make this component can be composite with reinforcement material fiber glass and epoxy resin
having properties like high strength and law density.
d. After stress and strain analysis of composite material, we chose 3m length and 30 cm height of stand8, 9.

Table- 3:Specification of sprinkler atomizer
Specification of sprinkler atomizer
ComponentsLow RPMIntermediate RPMHigh RPM
Weight0.6 kg0.6 kg0.6 kg
Power supply12DC12DC12DC
Maximum power consumption12 Watts12 Watts12 Watts
Disc RPM2000 rpm3500 rpm5000 rpm
Liquid feed speed500-3000 ml/min250-1000 ml/min125-500 ml/min
Spray droplet size200- 500 µm100-200 µm75-150 µm
Application Volume30-200 l/ha20-80 l/ha10-40 l/ha
Possible applicationWeed controlWeed control and fungiInsects on surface and fungi
And the whole setup will be driven by 12 volt motor from external battery power source.
4.3 Components of ATOMIZER
a. Motor
b. Motor Pulley
c. Drive Belt
d. Atomizer Discs
e. Atomizer Pulley
f. Mounting Bracket
Fig-1: Top view Fig-2:Side view

Fig-3:Front view Fig-4:Isometric view
4.4 Distribution percent as function of distance and pressure
a. Measurements taken further from the nozzle contains a higher concentration of larger water droplets because smaller
droplets have drifted (or evaporated) away.
b. As pressure increases, water atomizes and creates a higher concentration of smaller water particles.
c. Graph provides strong evidence that high pressure causes smaller water droplets that will increase water loss
significantly7.
5. Result/Conclusion
Through the development of this low cost controlled droplet application, we arrived at the conclusion that tackling spraying
inefficiencies to limit the use of pesticides is an urgent need in agriculture sector. Using spraying atomizers instead of normal
pest sprinklers and sprayers has come up to be best solution. We found that the key point of impact lies in the droplet size and
the separation between the droplets. For aiming weed, small herbs and fungi, droplets should be in the range of 100 - 200 μm
with rpm of 3500 rpm. Through this, a product model has also been developed in which the atomizer will oscillate to and fro.
The results obtained give opportunities for making significant decrease in negative effects of pesticides on both soil and living
creatures.
References
1. William Kranz. 2011. Monitoring irrigation water application with computerized controllers in Proceedings of the
23rd Annual Central Plains Irrigation Conference, Burlington, CO., February 22-23, 2011.
2. Karmeli, D and G. Peri. 1974. Basic principles of pulse irrigation. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Division, ASCE
100(IR3):309-319.
3. King, B. A., and D. C. Kincaid. 2004. A variable flow rate sprinkler for site-specific irrigation management. Applied
Engineering in Agriculture 20(6):765-770
4. http://www.fao.org/docrep/s8684e/s8684e06.htm
5. Carolyn Randall2013. National Pesticide Applicator Certification Core Manual :National Association of State
Departments of Agriculture Research Foundation, Washington, DC, Ch.1
6. George Tyler Miller 2004. Sustaining the Earth: An Integrated Approach. Thomson/Brooks/Cole. pp. 211–216.
ISBN978-0-534-40088-0.
7. Muhammad Sarwar2015. International Journal of Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering The Dangers of
Pesticides Associated with Public Health and Preventing of the Risks Vol. 1, No. 2, 2015, pp. 130-136
8. George, Rebecca; Joy, Varsha; S, Aiswarya; Jacob, Priya A. 2016. "Treatment Methods for Contaminated Soils –
Translating Science into Practice". International Journal of Education and Applied Research.

9. http://niphm.gov.in/ PHE-ASO-Manual-22042013.pdf
10. Russell P. Fleming, Automatic Sprinkler System Calculations, Sectionfour , Chapter 3, NFPA
11. Kincaid, D.C. 1996. Spray drop kinetic energy from irrigation sprinklers. Trans. ASAE 39(3):847-853
12. Thompson, A.L. and L.G. James. 1985. Water droplet impact and its effect on infiltration. Trans ASAE 28(5):1506-1520
13. Subramaniam S. 2001. Statistical Modeling of Sprays Using the Droplet Distribution Function, Physics of Fluids13
14. Code of design for sprinkler systems, 2001. China planning press, Beijing, p.12.
15. King , B.A. and D.L. Bjorneberg 2010 Droplet Kinetic Energy from Center-Pivot Sprinklers in 5th National Decennial
Irrigation CD-ROM Proceedings Phoenix Convention Center, 5 - 8 December 2010, Phoenix, AZ USA M. Dukes ed. St
Joseph Mich: ASABE
16. Allen, R.G., J. Keller, and D. Martin. 2000. Center pivot system design. Irrigation Association, Falls Church, VA. 300 p.
17. Cramer, H. E. and D. G. Boyle. 1976. Behavior-the micrometeorology and physics of spray particles behavior, pp. 27-
39. In: R. B. Roberts (Technical Coordinator). Pesticide spray application behavior, and assessment: workshop
proceedings. General Technical Report PSW-15. USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment
Station, Berkeley, CA
18. Dr. Russell R. Hahn 2012, Controlled Droplet Application, Pesticide Safety Education Program (PSEP), Cornell
University
19. Craymer, H.E., Boyle, D.G. 1973. The micrometeorology and physics of spray particle behavior Pesticide Spray
Technology Workshop, Emeryville, California, USA
20. Holterman, H.J. 2003. Kinetics and evaporation of water drops in air. IMAG report. 2003-12.
21. J.H. Combellack, The value of controlled droplet application as a spot spray technique for the control of noxious weeds
in Victoria, Keith Turnbull Research Institute, Department of Crown Lands and Survey, Frankston 3199, Victoria
Biographies:
Rakesh Nath is a 3rd year B.Tech student in the Department of Physics at IIT
Delhi. His work intrest is developing low cost technologies for rural
applications
Denish Sukhadiya is a 3rd year B.Tech student in the Department of
Mechanical Engineering at IIT Delhi. His work interest is developing low cost
technologies for rural applications and resource management.

Fabrication of Controlled Droplet Application for Efficient use of Pesticides

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Fabrication of Controlled Droplet Application for Efficient use of Pesticides (20)

More from IRJET Journal (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Fabrication of Controlled Droplet Application for Efficient use of Pesticides