Optical Metrology 2009 
FEA Comparison in 
ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
May 25th 2009
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— FEA computation and measurement 
are different in: 
—Coordinate Systems 
—Result presentation 
— Colored Images 
— Section Plots 
— FLDs 
Forming process 
Page 2 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
— Example: Forming of Suspension Arm 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— FEA computation and measurement 
are different in: 
—Coordinate Systems 
—Result presentation 
— Colored Images 
— Section Plots 
— FLDs 
— For a visual comparison of full field data 
—Same visualizations must be chosen 
—Same legends must be used 
Page 3 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Simulation result (LS-DYNA) 
Measurement result (ARGUS) 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— FEA Computation and Field Measurement 
are different in: 
—Coordinate Systems 
—Result presentation 
— Colored Images 
— Section Plots 
— FLDs 
— For a visual comparison of full field data 
—Same visualizations must be chosen 
—Same legends must be used 
— For comparison of section data 
—Same 3D sections must be generated 
Page 4 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Section definition (LS-DYNA) 
Section definition (ARGUS) 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— FEA Computation and Field Measurement 
are different in: 
—Coordinate Systems 
—Result presentation 
— Colored Images 
— Section Plots 
— FLDs 
— For a visual comparison of full field data 
—Same visualizations must be chosen 
—Same legends must be used 
— For comparison of section data 
—Same 3D sections must be generated 
—Same diagrams must be defined 
Page 5 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Simulation result (LS-DYNA) 
Measurement result (ARGUS) 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— FEA Computation and Field Measurement 
are different in: 
—Coordinate Systems 
—Result presentation 
— Colored Images 
— Section Plots 
— FLDs 
— For a visual comparison of full field data 
—Same visualizations must be chosen 
—Same legends must be used 
— For comparison of section data 
—Same 3D sections must be generated 
—Same diagrams must be defined 
— Export of section Data 
— Third party software can used for 
comparison 
—Manual alignment of x-Axis 
Page 6 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
FEA-Data-Export ARGUS-Data-Export 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
Former Workflow 
— Summary 
—No automatism 
— Time consuming 
—Only comparison of 
— Local areas (Sections and images) 
— Rough values (color images) 
Page 7 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Introduction 
FEA Comparison Module in ARAMIS/ARGUS 
— Import of FEA results in ARAMIS/ARGUS in V6.2 
— Alignment of measurement coordinate system to FEA 
— Calculation of full field deviation for 
—Geometry 
—Strain values (Major, Minor, …) 
Simulation 
Measurement 
Page 8 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Major true strain deviation 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Workflow 
Import 
— Import of FEA results in ARAMIS/ARGUS 
— Formats: 
— ABAQUS (ABAQUS input) 
— LS-DYNA (DYNAIN) 
— PAM-STAMP (M01) 
— AutoForm (AF) 
— ASCII (equivalent to DYNAIN) 
—Datatypes 
— Shell elements, considering: 
— Layers (upper or/and lower) 
— Normals (for accurate mapping) 
— Imported Values 
Consider: measurement results are 
surface values 
— Node coordinates (geometry) 
— Elements (connection between nodes) 
— Result values 
— Nodal results (LS-DYNA, ASCII) 
— Element results 
— 2D surface strain tensor (ABAQUS, PAM-STAMP) 
— Scalar (AutoForm) 
Page 9 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Workflow 
Alignment 
— For comparison Measurement and FEA must have the same coordinate system 
— Transformation 
Measurement coordinate system FEA coordinate system 
Page 10 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Without alignment 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3 
by 
—Manual Transformation Functions 
— 321-Transformation 
— Translation, Rotation 
—Best fit alignment 
— Pre-orientation 
— Best fit by selected areas 
After pre-orientation 
After best fit by complete surface
Workflow 
Geometry deviation 
— Calculation of distances between Measurement surface and FEA surface 
—Quality control of alignment 
Good alignment 
— Quality control of simulation boundary conditions like 
—Depth of drawing 
—Shape of Die 
— Quality control of simulation results 
—Geometry 
—Spring back 
—Wrinkling 
Page 11 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Small Surface deviation 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Workflow 
Mapping 
— Measurement Points and FEA nodes have 
always different positions 
—Measurement: red points 
— FEA: gird 
— Mapping: 
— Projection of measurement points to 
FEA mesh = mapped points 
— Interpolation of FEA result values for 
mapped points 
— Integration of FEA results to 
measurement result structure 
Page 12 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Measurement: red points 
FEA: gird 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Workflow 
Deviation calculation 
— Calculation of deviations for all points, e.g.: 
Major Strain deviation = Major (measurement point) – Major (mapped point) 
Measurement 
Mapped Simulation 
Page 13 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Major strain deviation 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
FEA Comparison Result 
Results in ARAMIS/ARGUS 
— Available result values for all points after comparison: 
—Coordinates 
—3D Displacements of measurement, FEA and deviation 
—Strains (Major, Minor, Mises, …) 
— All result evaluation functions of ARAMIS/ARGUS are available: 
— Postprocessing 
— Filter 
— Interpolation 
— Statistics 
—Elements 
— Full field data 
— Sections 
— Pointmarker 
— Presentation 
— 3D Window 
— Diagrams 
— Reports 
—Export 
Page 14 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Suspension Arm 
— Optimization of FEA 
—Adjustment of 
clamping simulation 
(blank holder movement) 
Page 15 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Major true strain deviation of first simulation step 
Major true strain deviation after FEA optimization 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Suspension Arm 
— Optimization of FEA 
—Without spring-back simulation 
—With spring-back simulation 
Surface deviation with spring-back in FEA 
Page 16 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Surface deviation without spring-back in FEA 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— ARGUS XL measurement 
—Unformed point distance: 1mm 
—Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 
— Points made by Laser 
Major true strain measurement 
Page 17 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— ARGUS XL measurement 
—Unformed point distance: 1mm 
—Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 
— Points made by Laser 
Major true strain FEA 
Page 18 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— ARGUS XL measurement 
—Unformed point distance: 1mm 
—Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 
— Points made by Laser 
Major true strain deviation 
Page 19 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— Local details 
Major true strain measurement Major true strain FEA Major true strain deviation 
Simulation mesh 
Page 20 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
Boundary FEA 
Boundary measurement 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— Local wrinkles 
Surface measurement Surface FEA 
Page 21 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3 
Simulation mesh Surface deviation
Application Example 
Trunk Lid 
— Local detail: Missing seam in FEA 
Simulation mesh 
Surface measurement 
Surface FEA 
Seam 
No Seam 
Major true strain measurement Major true strain FEA Major true strain deviation 
Page 22 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Summary 
— FEA-comparison modul 
— Is part of ARAMIS and ARGUS in V6.2 (summer 2009) 
—Available for Linux and Windows 
— Full field comparison for ARAMIS/ARGUS 
—Comfortable alignment and mapping 
—Determination of full field deviations for 
— Geometry 
— Displacements 
— Strains (Major, Minor, …) 
— Easy and comfortable 
— FEA verification 
—Result evaluation 
—Reporting 
— Comparison from measurement to measurement (ARAMIS/ARGUS) 
Page 23 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS 
Harald Friebe 
2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 
3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
Thank you for your 
attention 
info@gom.com 
www.gom.com

More Related Content

PDF
GOM Automotive Testing
PDF
GOM Verification Of Finite Element Simulations
PDF
Gom Applications In Aerospace Testing
PPTX
Thesis_PPT
PDF
Noise and Vibrations for automotive-umashankar
PDF
Structural Optimization & Durability Analysis of VW Bettle Cross Exhaust Muf...
PDF
Flow Modification over Rotor Blade with Suction Boundary Layer Control Technique
PPT
Vehicle Dynamics (Transportation Engineering)
GOM Automotive Testing
GOM Verification Of Finite Element Simulations
Gom Applications In Aerospace Testing
Thesis_PPT
Noise and Vibrations for automotive-umashankar
Structural Optimization & Durability Analysis of VW Bettle Cross Exhaust Muf...
Flow Modification over Rotor Blade with Suction Boundary Layer Control Technique
Vehicle Dynamics (Transportation Engineering)

What's hot (20)

PDF
Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Multi-Storeyed Building using Staad Pro
PDF
Investigation of spatial cam by the lean method
PDF
Experimental and Numerical Modal Analysis of a Compressor Mounting Bracket
PDF
CIM & Automation Lab Manual VTU
PDF
Li3619361944
PDF
2016 optimisation a rear wing endplate in a rotating domain
PDF
Enrollment major export
PDF
2016 optimisation of front wing ground clearance - write up
PPTX
nikhil bhagat cmm presentation
PPTX
Shearograhy in the tire industry - short course
PDF
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
PDF
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
PDF
11-Structural Design ( Highway Engineering Dr. Sherif El-Badawy )
PDF
Taguchi method and anova an approach for process parameters 2
PDF
Aa04507153160
PDF
Cfd analysis of flow charateristics in a gas turbine a viable approach
PDF
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Gearbox of an All-Terrain Vehicle
PDF
Static Analysis of the Roll Cage of an All-Terrain Vehicle (SAE BAJA)
PDF
Rehabilitation Study of NH34 Kabrai to Maudaha through the 35.00 Km Section L...
PDF
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
Computer Aided Analysis and Design of Multi-Storeyed Building using Staad Pro
Investigation of spatial cam by the lean method
Experimental and Numerical Modal Analysis of a Compressor Mounting Bracket
CIM & Automation Lab Manual VTU
Li3619361944
2016 optimisation a rear wing endplate in a rotating domain
Enrollment major export
2016 optimisation of front wing ground clearance - write up
nikhil bhagat cmm presentation
Shearograhy in the tire industry - short course
A SIMULATE MODEL FOR ANALYZING THE EFFECT OF ENGINE DESIGN PARAMETERS ON THE ...
Manufacturing of rapid prototypes of mechanical parts using reverse engineeri...
11-Structural Design ( Highway Engineering Dr. Sherif El-Badawy )
Taguchi method and anova an approach for process parameters 2
Aa04507153160
Cfd analysis of flow charateristics in a gas turbine a viable approach
IRJET- Design and Analysis of Gearbox of an All-Terrain Vehicle
Static Analysis of the Roll Cage of an All-Terrain Vehicle (SAE BAJA)
Rehabilitation Study of NH34 Kabrai to Maudaha through the 35.00 Km Section L...
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
Ad

Similar to FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS (20)

PPT
pete_2005_PTC_Users_event
PDF
Rigid pavement-manual
PDF
Therm7 05-14-drawing tips
PPT
Step support for_design_and_engineering_analys
PDF
Development platform
PDF
Linear Model of Coregionalization
PDF
BREEZE AERMOD 7.9.2 Release Notes
PDF
Internship phase 1 - 08 07 2012
PDF
MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL PROPELLER SHAFT FOR ASHOK LEYL...
PPS
Multivariable Flow Measurement
PDF
Field Dominance Algorithm
PDF
FLUID FLOW ANALYSIS OF CENTRIFUGAL FAN BY USING FEM
PDF
Vavo app irdrop_em_analysis_flow
PDF
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
PPTX
3DCS Compliant Modeler, add FEA to your Tolerance Analysis
PDF
Co rs tutorial10
PDF
Australia GPS baselines
PPTX
Workshop NGS data analysis - 2
PDF
Design Optimization and CFD Analysis of Car using Active Mounting to Reduce D...
PDF
FISITA-F2006M035-Kerschbaum-Gruen
pete_2005_PTC_Users_event
Rigid pavement-manual
Therm7 05-14-drawing tips
Step support for_design_and_engineering_analys
Development platform
Linear Model of Coregionalization
BREEZE AERMOD 7.9.2 Release Notes
Internship phase 1 - 08 07 2012
MODELLING AND SIMULATION OF COMPOSITE MATERIAL PROPELLER SHAFT FOR ASHOK LEYL...
Multivariable Flow Measurement
Field Dominance Algorithm
FLUID FLOW ANALYSIS OF CENTRIFUGAL FAN BY USING FEM
Vavo app irdrop_em_analysis_flow
Tutorial VSP Conference 2013, San Luis Obispo, CA
3DCS Compliant Modeler, add FEA to your Tolerance Analysis
Co rs tutorial10
Australia GPS baselines
Workshop NGS data analysis - 2
Design Optimization and CFD Analysis of Car using Active Mounting to Reduce D...
FISITA-F2006M035-Kerschbaum-Gruen
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
How to Make Money in the Metaverse_ Top Strategies for Beginners.pdf
PPTX
Computer Software - Technology and Livelihood Education
PDF
Types of Token_ From Utility to Security.pdf
PDF
Multiverse AI Review 2025: Access All TOP AI Model-Versions!
PDF
AI-Powered Threat Modeling: The Future of Cybersecurity by Arun Kumar Elengov...
PDF
Cost to Outsource Software Development in 2025
PDF
AI Guide for Business Growth - Arna Softech
PDF
Visual explanation of Dijkstra's Algorithm using Python
PDF
The Dynamic Duo Transforming Financial Accounting Systems Through Modern Expe...
DOCX
Modern SharePoint Intranet Templates That Boost Employee Engagement in 2025.docx
PDF
Topaz Photo AI Crack New Download (Latest 2025)
PDF
Autodesk AutoCAD Crack Free Download 2025
PDF
Wondershare Recoverit Full Crack New Version (Latest 2025)
PPTX
Introduction to Windows Operating System
PPTX
Weekly report ppt - harsh dattuprasad patel.pptx
DOCX
How to Use SharePoint as an ISO-Compliant Document Management System
PDF
How AI/LLM recommend to you ? GDG meetup 16 Aug by Fariman Guliev
PDF
MCP Security Tutorial - Beginner to Advanced
PDF
CCleaner 6.39.11548 Crack 2025 License Key
PPTX
Monitoring Stack: Grafana, Loki & Promtail
How to Make Money in the Metaverse_ Top Strategies for Beginners.pdf
Computer Software - Technology and Livelihood Education
Types of Token_ From Utility to Security.pdf
Multiverse AI Review 2025: Access All TOP AI Model-Versions!
AI-Powered Threat Modeling: The Future of Cybersecurity by Arun Kumar Elengov...
Cost to Outsource Software Development in 2025
AI Guide for Business Growth - Arna Softech
Visual explanation of Dijkstra's Algorithm using Python
The Dynamic Duo Transforming Financial Accounting Systems Through Modern Expe...
Modern SharePoint Intranet Templates That Boost Employee Engagement in 2025.docx
Topaz Photo AI Crack New Download (Latest 2025)
Autodesk AutoCAD Crack Free Download 2025
Wondershare Recoverit Full Crack New Version (Latest 2025)
Introduction to Windows Operating System
Weekly report ppt - harsh dattuprasad patel.pptx
How to Use SharePoint as an ISO-Compliant Document Management System
How AI/LLM recommend to you ? GDG meetup 16 Aug by Fariman Guliev
MCP Security Tutorial - Beginner to Advanced
CCleaner 6.39.11548 Crack 2025 License Key
Monitoring Stack: Grafana, Loki & Promtail

FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS

  • 1. Optical Metrology 2009 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe May 25th 2009
  • 2. Introduction Former Workflow — FEA computation and measurement are different in: —Coordinate Systems —Result presentation — Colored Images — Section Plots — FLDs Forming process Page 2 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 — Example: Forming of Suspension Arm 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 3. Introduction Former Workflow — FEA computation and measurement are different in: —Coordinate Systems —Result presentation — Colored Images — Section Plots — FLDs — For a visual comparison of full field data —Same visualizations must be chosen —Same legends must be used Page 3 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Simulation result (LS-DYNA) Measurement result (ARGUS) 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 4. Introduction Former Workflow — FEA Computation and Field Measurement are different in: —Coordinate Systems —Result presentation — Colored Images — Section Plots — FLDs — For a visual comparison of full field data —Same visualizations must be chosen —Same legends must be used — For comparison of section data —Same 3D sections must be generated Page 4 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Section definition (LS-DYNA) Section definition (ARGUS) 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 5. Introduction Former Workflow — FEA Computation and Field Measurement are different in: —Coordinate Systems —Result presentation — Colored Images — Section Plots — FLDs — For a visual comparison of full field data —Same visualizations must be chosen —Same legends must be used — For comparison of section data —Same 3D sections must be generated —Same diagrams must be defined Page 5 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Simulation result (LS-DYNA) Measurement result (ARGUS) 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 6. Introduction Former Workflow — FEA Computation and Field Measurement are different in: —Coordinate Systems —Result presentation — Colored Images — Section Plots — FLDs — For a visual comparison of full field data —Same visualizations must be chosen —Same legends must be used — For comparison of section data —Same 3D sections must be generated —Same diagrams must be defined — Export of section Data — Third party software can used for comparison —Manual alignment of x-Axis Page 6 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 FEA-Data-Export ARGUS-Data-Export 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 7. Introduction Former Workflow — Summary —No automatism — Time consuming —Only comparison of — Local areas (Sections and images) — Rough values (color images) Page 7 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 8. Introduction FEA Comparison Module in ARAMIS/ARGUS — Import of FEA results in ARAMIS/ARGUS in V6.2 — Alignment of measurement coordinate system to FEA — Calculation of full field deviation for —Geometry —Strain values (Major, Minor, …) Simulation Measurement Page 8 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Major true strain deviation 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 9. Workflow Import — Import of FEA results in ARAMIS/ARGUS — Formats: — ABAQUS (ABAQUS input) — LS-DYNA (DYNAIN) — PAM-STAMP (M01) — AutoForm (AF) — ASCII (equivalent to DYNAIN) —Datatypes — Shell elements, considering: — Layers (upper or/and lower) — Normals (for accurate mapping) — Imported Values Consider: measurement results are surface values — Node coordinates (geometry) — Elements (connection between nodes) — Result values — Nodal results (LS-DYNA, ASCII) — Element results — 2D surface strain tensor (ABAQUS, PAM-STAMP) — Scalar (AutoForm) Page 9 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 10. Workflow Alignment — For comparison Measurement and FEA must have the same coordinate system — Transformation Measurement coordinate system FEA coordinate system Page 10 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Without alignment 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3 by —Manual Transformation Functions — 321-Transformation — Translation, Rotation —Best fit alignment — Pre-orientation — Best fit by selected areas After pre-orientation After best fit by complete surface
  • 11. Workflow Geometry deviation — Calculation of distances between Measurement surface and FEA surface —Quality control of alignment Good alignment — Quality control of simulation boundary conditions like —Depth of drawing —Shape of Die — Quality control of simulation results —Geometry —Spring back —Wrinkling Page 11 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Small Surface deviation 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 12. Workflow Mapping — Measurement Points and FEA nodes have always different positions —Measurement: red points — FEA: gird — Mapping: — Projection of measurement points to FEA mesh = mapped points — Interpolation of FEA result values for mapped points — Integration of FEA results to measurement result structure Page 12 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Measurement: red points FEA: gird 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 13. Workflow Deviation calculation — Calculation of deviations for all points, e.g.: Major Strain deviation = Major (measurement point) – Major (mapped point) Measurement Mapped Simulation Page 13 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Major strain deviation 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 14. FEA Comparison Result Results in ARAMIS/ARGUS — Available result values for all points after comparison: —Coordinates —3D Displacements of measurement, FEA and deviation —Strains (Major, Minor, Mises, …) — All result evaluation functions of ARAMIS/ARGUS are available: — Postprocessing — Filter — Interpolation — Statistics —Elements — Full field data — Sections — Pointmarker — Presentation — 3D Window — Diagrams — Reports —Export Page 14 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 15. Application Example Suspension Arm — Optimization of FEA —Adjustment of clamping simulation (blank holder movement) Page 15 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Major true strain deviation of first simulation step Major true strain deviation after FEA optimization 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 16. Application Example Suspension Arm — Optimization of FEA —Without spring-back simulation —With spring-back simulation Surface deviation with spring-back in FEA Page 16 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Surface deviation without spring-back in FEA 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 17. Application Example Trunk Lid — ARGUS XL measurement —Unformed point distance: 1mm —Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 — Points made by Laser Major true strain measurement Page 17 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 18. Application Example Trunk Lid — ARGUS XL measurement —Unformed point distance: 1mm —Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 — Points made by Laser Major true strain FEA Page 18 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 19. Application Example Trunk Lid — ARGUS XL measurement —Unformed point distance: 1mm —Amount of measurement point: 1.300.000 — Points made by Laser Major true strain deviation Page 19 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 20. Application Example Trunk Lid — Local details Major true strain measurement Major true strain FEA Major true strain deviation Simulation mesh Page 20 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 Boundary FEA Boundary measurement 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 21. Application Example Trunk Lid — Local wrinkles Surface measurement Surface FEA Page 21 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3 Simulation mesh Surface deviation
  • 22. Application Example Trunk Lid — Local detail: Missing seam in FEA Simulation mesh Surface measurement Surface FEA Seam No Seam Major true strain measurement Major true strain FEA Major true strain deviation Page 22 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 23. Summary — FEA-comparison modul — Is part of ARAMIS and ARGUS in V6.2 (summer 2009) —Available for Linux and Windows — Full field comparison for ARAMIS/ARGUS —Comfortable alignment and mapping —Determination of full field deviations for — Geometry — Displacements — Strains (Major, Minor, …) — Easy and comfortable — FEA verification —Result evaluation —Reporting — Comparison from measurement to measurement (ARAMIS/ARGUS) Page 23 FEA Comparison in ARAMIS and ARGUS Harald Friebe 2-Frame 2-Frame Setup / Frame 1 Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 1 3-Frame Setup / Frame 2 3-Frame Setup / Frame 3
  • 24. Thank you for your attention info@gom.com www.gom.com