SlideShare a Scribd company logo
GROUP 7 ASSIGNMENT
MODULE: FEBE101
NAME REG NUMBER PROGRAM
Anotidaishe E Mawite R233768K HENCENG
Nisbert Taringa R233852P HMETE
Dion T Wisani R233574D HENMTR
Respect S Mavasa R233618A HGEG
Winfield Mubaya R233802K AEROV
Philomena Purazi R2337335 HRE
Nyasha B Guraajena R233772Q HMIE
Kelvin Mavetera R233775G HEMCENG
Allen Njete R233508E HENMECH
Simon K Sithole R233659R HENELENG
Anesu R Mashana R233725N HENCEQS
Emmanuel M Gabaza R233652D HENELENG
Munashe M Chibage R233757N HMIE
Brighton Chingoriwo R235650K HGEG
QUESTION
Make a comparison between scholarly information
and popular information
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
Refers to original research or analysis of human affairs , science or humanities and have been reviewed
and agreed by experts in a particular field which aboard results of original research , e.G.,
Books ,journal articles and conference papers(Webster F. And House L. ,2011)
POPULAR INFORMATION
Popular.....Refers to content intended for consumption by the general public that has few citations
which are short and precise found in newspapers, magazines or websites (MIKKONEN,S. 2010)
COMPARISON
We are going to compare scholarly information and popular information in terms of -:
i. ACCESSIBILITY
ii. CITATION
iii. AUDIENCE
iv. PRESENTATION
v. PURPOSE
vi. REVIEW
vii. CREDIBILITY
ACCESSIBILITY
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Accessibility to scholarly information
may be restricted and require
subscriptions or access through
academic institutions or libraries.
• Scholarly information is limited to
library, book stores, online stores such
as amazon and schools or colleges.
(Stock, 2015)
POPULAR INFORMATION
• According to Stock(2015), popular
Information is widely available and
convenient to access octenyl for free
through various media platforms and
outlets
• You can easily by a newspaper in a street,
also accessibility of magazines is easy
through use of platforms like instagram
CITATION
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Bennett (2017),is of the point that scholarly
information adheres to specific citations from
carried out experiments and peer reviewed
information, and specific referencing style
which comprises of name of source, year of
publishment ,author and house of publishment.
POPULAR INFORMATION
• Popular information often lacks proper citation
and references ,making it difficult to verify the
accuracy of the information presented. This is
because anyone without the help of experts
for reviewing the information can publish
information on platforms such as google or
Instagram (Tenopir et al, 2022)
AUDIENCE
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Scholarly information is intended for an
audience of experts, researchers and
academics within a specific and is peer
reviewed before publication (Tenopir et
al ,2022)
POPULAR INFORMATION
• Popular information is often targeting the
general audience and is not as much peer
reviewed(van clay,2012)
PRESENTATION
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Scholarly information utilizes the use of graphs
,tables and pie charts to present reliable
information. It also uses abstract , literature
information. It and conclusion and has little or
no advertising. Little advertising involves
promoting books journals and conferences
(Van clay,2012)
POPULAR INFORMATION
• Popular information is influenced by
commercial interest and may prioritize
entertainment value over factual accuracy and
articles do not have a specific format or
structure,(Van clay,2012).
PURPOSE
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Experts in their fields write scholarly articles
that are meant for academics, researchers,
and professionals. The goal of scholarly
information is to further understanding in a
particular field by means of novel
investigation, theoretical analysis, or critical
assessment of previously published works.
(Pears, R. & Shields, G. 2016).
POPULAR INFORMATION
• Contrarily, popular information is written with
a broad audience in mind and seeks to
enlighten, amuse, or convince. It is frequently
meant for general consumption and might not
always be founded on original research.
(Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. 2003)
REVIEW
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
Scholarly articles are subjected to a rigorous
peer review process prior to publication, during
which time professionals in the field assess the
research's quality, validity, and significance. This
guarantees the accuracy and legitimacy of the
information. (Taylor, J. 2011).
POPULAR INFORMATION
News stories and blog entries are examples of
popular content that might not undergo peer
review. Although editing oversight can increase
accuracy, the content is frequently subjected to a
less thorough review process than in scholarly
publications. (Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. 2010).
CREDIBILITY
SCHOLARLY INFORMATION
• Because scholarly information is subject to a
thorough review process, employs rigorous
research methods, and relies heavily on
arguments supported by evidence, it is
generally regarded as credible. Furthermore,
other academics in the field frequently cite it.
(Smith, E. 2018).
POPULAR INFORMATION
• Popular information may vary in credibility.
While some sources are reputable and fact-
checked, others may be biased, inaccurate, or
lack authoritative backing. (Ward, S. J. A.
2008)
REFERENCES
• WEBSTER, F., & HOUSE, L. (2011). SCHOLARLY INFORMATION DISCOVERY IN THE NETWORKED ACADEMIC LEARNING ENVIRONMENT. INFORMATION
RESEARCH, 13(2), PAPER 426.)
• MIKKONEN, S. (2010). SEEKING INFORMATION: POPULAR AND SCHOLARLY INFORMATION SOURCES. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 66(6), 936-947.)
• TENOPIR, C., & KING, D. W. (2022). SCHOLARLY JOURNALS AND THEIR FUTURE. JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 54(2), 85-97.
• STOCK, P. (2015). POPULAR SCIENCE. IN THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY (SPRING 2015 EDITION). EDWARD N. ZALTA (ED.).
• BENNETT, L. (2017). POPULAR INFORMATION: THE JOURNALIST'S RESPONSIBILITY IN A NEW MEDIA LANDSCAPE. MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 5(3), 5-
14.
• VANCLAY, J. K. (2012). INVITED COMMENTARY: THE SCHOLARLY INFLUENCE OF POPULAR SCIENCE. SCIENTOMETRICS, 93(3), 563-567.
• PEARS, R. & SHIELDS, G. (2016). CITE THEM RIGHT: THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCING GUIDE (10TH ED.). BASINGSTOKE: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN.
• CROTEAU, D., & HOYNES, W. (2003). MEDIA SOCIETY: INDUSTRIES, IMAGES, AND AUDIENCES. THOUSAND OAKS, CA: SAGE PUBLICATIONS.
• TAYLOR, J. (2011). UNDERSTANDING AND WRITING UP QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. IN J. NEWELL & M. MCVICAR (EDS), ENHANCING YOUR HEALTHCARE
BUSINESS: 55 - 70. CHICHESTER, UK: WILEY-BLACKWELL.
• KOVACH, B., & ROSENSTIEL, T. (2010). BLUR: HOW TO KNOW WHAT'S TRUE IN THE AGE OF INFORMATION OVERLOAD. NEW YORK: BLOOMSBURY PRESS.
• SMITH, E. (2018). ACADEMIC WRITING AND PUBLISHING: A PRACTICAL HANDBOOK. LONDON: ROUTLEDGE.
• WARD, S. J. A. (2008). JOURNALISM ETHICS: ARGUMENTS AND CASES FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. NEW YORK: ROUTLEDGE
THE END

More Related Content

PPTX
GROUP 7 FEBE101 ASSIGNMENT 1 our assignment.pptx
PPTX
Evolving and emerging scholarly communication services in libraries: public a...
PPTX
Latest trends in open science and big data analytical study: a decade of scie...
PDF
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers (MTM-MSc 2022)
PPTX
Basic guidelines for Research Proposal.pptx
PPTX
Scientific Communication.pptx
PPTX
Disseminating Scientific Papers via Twitter: Practical Insights and Research ...
PDF
Helig webinar 6 nov_2014
GROUP 7 FEBE101 ASSIGNMENT 1 our assignment.pptx
Evolving and emerging scholarly communication services in libraries: public a...
Latest trends in open science and big data analytical study: a decade of scie...
Science dissemination 2.0: Social media for researchers (MTM-MSc 2022)
Basic guidelines for Research Proposal.pptx
Scientific Communication.pptx
Disseminating Scientific Papers via Twitter: Practical Insights and Research ...
Helig webinar 6 nov_2014

Similar to FEBE101 ASSIGNMENT 1, INforrmATION SKILLS (20)

PDF
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility ...
PPTX
Data Citation Rewards and Incentives
PDF
Aligning scientific impact and societal relevance: The roles of academic enga...
PDF
Research conceptualization new
PDF
Tweets and Mendeley readers: Two different types of article level metrics
PPTX
Rationality of the research Proposal.pptx
PPTX
RP.pptx Research proposal for business students
PPTX
Metrics vs peer review: Why metrics can (and should?) be applied in the Socia...
PPTX
Research proposal writting.pptx for business
PDF
Research methodolgy & methods.docx
PPTX
WEBINAR: Joining the "buzz": the role of social media in raising research vi...
PDF
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
PDF
Analysis of Bibliometrics information for select the best field of study
PDF
Kochalko,"Why we should stop worrying about high impact journal indicators an...
PPTX
Edulearn2014 itd
PPTX
background of the study, statement of the problem, review of related literatu...
PDF
Making an impact: Scientific profiles and bibliometric indicators
PPTX
The Geography of Distance Education Research - Bibliographic Characteristics ...
PDF
Love for science or 'Academic Prostitution' - DFD2014 version
Joining the ‘buzz’ : the role of social media in raising research visibility ...
Data Citation Rewards and Incentives
Aligning scientific impact and societal relevance: The roles of academic enga...
Research conceptualization new
Tweets and Mendeley readers: Two different types of article level metrics
Rationality of the research Proposal.pptx
RP.pptx Research proposal for business students
Metrics vs peer review: Why metrics can (and should?) be applied in the Socia...
Research proposal writting.pptx for business
Research methodolgy & methods.docx
WEBINAR: Joining the "buzz": the role of social media in raising research vi...
Bibliometrics and research impact workshop in the scienes and engineering fields
Analysis of Bibliometrics information for select the best field of study
Kochalko,"Why we should stop worrying about high impact journal indicators an...
Edulearn2014 itd
background of the study, statement of the problem, review of related literatu...
Making an impact: Scientific profiles and bibliometric indicators
The Geography of Distance Education Research - Bibliographic Characteristics ...
Love for science or 'Academic Prostitution' - DFD2014 version
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
technical writing on emotional quotient ppt
PPTX
show1- motivational ispiring positive thinking
PPTX
Personal Development - By Knowing Oneself?
PPTX
Emotional Intelligence- Importance and Applicability
PDF
⚡ Prepping for grid failure_ 6 Must-Haves to Survive Blackout!.pdf
PDF
Red Light Wali Muskurahat – A Heart-touching Hindi Story
PPTX
Learn how to prevent Workplace Incidents?
PPTX
THEORIES-PSYCH-3.pptx theory of Abraham Maslow
PPTX
How to Deal with Imposter Syndrome for Personality Development?
PPTX
PERDEV-LESSON-3 DEVELOPMENTMENTAL STAGES.pptx
PDF
Elle Lalli on The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Entrepreneurship
PDF
My 'novel' Account of Human Possibility pdf.pdf
PPTX
Presentation on interview preparation.pt
PPTX
UNIVERSAL HUMAN VALUES for NEP student .pptx
PPTX
Chapter-7-The-Spiritual-Self-.pptx-First
PPTX
Commmunication in Todays world- Principles and Barriers
PPT
proper hygiene for teenagers for secondary students .ppt
PPTX
Pradeep Kumar Roll no.30 Paper I.pptx....
PPTX
SELF ASSESSMENT -SNAPSHOT.pptx an index of yourself by Dr NIKITA SHARMA
DOCX
Boost your energy levels and Shred Weight
technical writing on emotional quotient ppt
show1- motivational ispiring positive thinking
Personal Development - By Knowing Oneself?
Emotional Intelligence- Importance and Applicability
⚡ Prepping for grid failure_ 6 Must-Haves to Survive Blackout!.pdf
Red Light Wali Muskurahat – A Heart-touching Hindi Story
Learn how to prevent Workplace Incidents?
THEORIES-PSYCH-3.pptx theory of Abraham Maslow
How to Deal with Imposter Syndrome for Personality Development?
PERDEV-LESSON-3 DEVELOPMENTMENTAL STAGES.pptx
Elle Lalli on The Role of Emotional Intelligence in Entrepreneurship
My 'novel' Account of Human Possibility pdf.pdf
Presentation on interview preparation.pt
UNIVERSAL HUMAN VALUES for NEP student .pptx
Chapter-7-The-Spiritual-Self-.pptx-First
Commmunication in Todays world- Principles and Barriers
proper hygiene for teenagers for secondary students .ppt
Pradeep Kumar Roll no.30 Paper I.pptx....
SELF ASSESSMENT -SNAPSHOT.pptx an index of yourself by Dr NIKITA SHARMA
Boost your energy levels and Shred Weight
Ad

FEBE101 ASSIGNMENT 1, INforrmATION SKILLS

  • 2. NAME REG NUMBER PROGRAM Anotidaishe E Mawite R233768K HENCENG Nisbert Taringa R233852P HMETE Dion T Wisani R233574D HENMTR Respect S Mavasa R233618A HGEG Winfield Mubaya R233802K AEROV Philomena Purazi R2337335 HRE Nyasha B Guraajena R233772Q HMIE Kelvin Mavetera R233775G HEMCENG Allen Njete R233508E HENMECH Simon K Sithole R233659R HENELENG Anesu R Mashana R233725N HENCEQS Emmanuel M Gabaza R233652D HENELENG Munashe M Chibage R233757N HMIE Brighton Chingoriwo R235650K HGEG
  • 3. QUESTION Make a comparison between scholarly information and popular information
  • 4. SCHOLARLY INFORMATION Refers to original research or analysis of human affairs , science or humanities and have been reviewed and agreed by experts in a particular field which aboard results of original research , e.G., Books ,journal articles and conference papers(Webster F. And House L. ,2011)
  • 5. POPULAR INFORMATION Popular.....Refers to content intended for consumption by the general public that has few citations which are short and precise found in newspapers, magazines or websites (MIKKONEN,S. 2010)
  • 6. COMPARISON We are going to compare scholarly information and popular information in terms of -: i. ACCESSIBILITY ii. CITATION iii. AUDIENCE iv. PRESENTATION v. PURPOSE vi. REVIEW vii. CREDIBILITY
  • 7. ACCESSIBILITY SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Accessibility to scholarly information may be restricted and require subscriptions or access through academic institutions or libraries. • Scholarly information is limited to library, book stores, online stores such as amazon and schools or colleges. (Stock, 2015) POPULAR INFORMATION • According to Stock(2015), popular Information is widely available and convenient to access octenyl for free through various media platforms and outlets • You can easily by a newspaper in a street, also accessibility of magazines is easy through use of platforms like instagram
  • 8. CITATION SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Bennett (2017),is of the point that scholarly information adheres to specific citations from carried out experiments and peer reviewed information, and specific referencing style which comprises of name of source, year of publishment ,author and house of publishment. POPULAR INFORMATION • Popular information often lacks proper citation and references ,making it difficult to verify the accuracy of the information presented. This is because anyone without the help of experts for reviewing the information can publish information on platforms such as google or Instagram (Tenopir et al, 2022)
  • 9. AUDIENCE SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Scholarly information is intended for an audience of experts, researchers and academics within a specific and is peer reviewed before publication (Tenopir et al ,2022) POPULAR INFORMATION • Popular information is often targeting the general audience and is not as much peer reviewed(van clay,2012)
  • 10. PRESENTATION SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Scholarly information utilizes the use of graphs ,tables and pie charts to present reliable information. It also uses abstract , literature information. It and conclusion and has little or no advertising. Little advertising involves promoting books journals and conferences (Van clay,2012) POPULAR INFORMATION • Popular information is influenced by commercial interest and may prioritize entertainment value over factual accuracy and articles do not have a specific format or structure,(Van clay,2012).
  • 11. PURPOSE SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Experts in their fields write scholarly articles that are meant for academics, researchers, and professionals. The goal of scholarly information is to further understanding in a particular field by means of novel investigation, theoretical analysis, or critical assessment of previously published works. (Pears, R. & Shields, G. 2016). POPULAR INFORMATION • Contrarily, popular information is written with a broad audience in mind and seeks to enlighten, amuse, or convince. It is frequently meant for general consumption and might not always be founded on original research. (Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. 2003)
  • 12. REVIEW SCHOLARLY INFORMATION Scholarly articles are subjected to a rigorous peer review process prior to publication, during which time professionals in the field assess the research's quality, validity, and significance. This guarantees the accuracy and legitimacy of the information. (Taylor, J. 2011). POPULAR INFORMATION News stories and blog entries are examples of popular content that might not undergo peer review. Although editing oversight can increase accuracy, the content is frequently subjected to a less thorough review process than in scholarly publications. (Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. 2010).
  • 13. CREDIBILITY SCHOLARLY INFORMATION • Because scholarly information is subject to a thorough review process, employs rigorous research methods, and relies heavily on arguments supported by evidence, it is generally regarded as credible. Furthermore, other academics in the field frequently cite it. (Smith, E. 2018). POPULAR INFORMATION • Popular information may vary in credibility. While some sources are reputable and fact- checked, others may be biased, inaccurate, or lack authoritative backing. (Ward, S. J. A. 2008)
  • 14. REFERENCES • WEBSTER, F., & HOUSE, L. (2011). SCHOLARLY INFORMATION DISCOVERY IN THE NETWORKED ACADEMIC LEARNING ENVIRONMENT. INFORMATION RESEARCH, 13(2), PAPER 426.) • MIKKONEN, S. (2010). SEEKING INFORMATION: POPULAR AND SCHOLARLY INFORMATION SOURCES. JOURNAL OF DOCUMENTATION, 66(6), 936-947.) • TENOPIR, C., & KING, D. W. (2022). SCHOLARLY JOURNALS AND THEIR FUTURE. JOURNAL OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING, 54(2), 85-97. • STOCK, P. (2015). POPULAR SCIENCE. IN THE STANFORD ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY (SPRING 2015 EDITION). EDWARD N. ZALTA (ED.). • BENNETT, L. (2017). POPULAR INFORMATION: THE JOURNALIST'S RESPONSIBILITY IN A NEW MEDIA LANDSCAPE. MEDIA AND COMMUNICATION, 5(3), 5- 14. • VANCLAY, J. K. (2012). INVITED COMMENTARY: THE SCHOLARLY INFLUENCE OF POPULAR SCIENCE. SCIENTOMETRICS, 93(3), 563-567. • PEARS, R. & SHIELDS, G. (2016). CITE THEM RIGHT: THE ESSENTIAL REFERENCING GUIDE (10TH ED.). BASINGSTOKE: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN. • CROTEAU, D., & HOYNES, W. (2003). MEDIA SOCIETY: INDUSTRIES, IMAGES, AND AUDIENCES. THOUSAND OAKS, CA: SAGE PUBLICATIONS. • TAYLOR, J. (2011). UNDERSTANDING AND WRITING UP QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. IN J. NEWELL & M. MCVICAR (EDS), ENHANCING YOUR HEALTHCARE BUSINESS: 55 - 70. CHICHESTER, UK: WILEY-BLACKWELL. • KOVACH, B., & ROSENSTIEL, T. (2010). BLUR: HOW TO KNOW WHAT'S TRUE IN THE AGE OF INFORMATION OVERLOAD. NEW YORK: BLOOMSBURY PRESS. • SMITH, E. (2018). ACADEMIC WRITING AND PUBLISHING: A PRACTICAL HANDBOOK. LONDON: ROUTLEDGE. • WARD, S. J. A. (2008). JOURNALISM ETHICS: ARGUMENTS AND CASES FOR THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY. NEW YORK: ROUTLEDGE