Feedback as Dialogue: 	Building Student Engagement with Formative Assessment PracticesStylianosHatzipanagos, King's College London Steven Warburton, King's College LondonSociety for Research into Higher EducationAnnual ConferenceDecember 8th - 10th 2009, Newport, Wales
Closing the loop: two projects Exploring policy, teaching practices and tutor and student views in three Open and Distance Learning environments. Investigating the relationship between formative assessment and learning technologies
Formative (FA) and summative (SA) assessmentFormative or assessment for learning (Albon, 2003; Wiliam et al., 2004; Nicol & MacFarlane-Dick, 2004; Black, 2005)Duality “SA/FA” may not represent opposite poles of assessment (Hargreaves, 2005; Dylan, 2006)FA is ‘SA with feedback’, which can be used by the learner (Taras 2005)Positive implications for student learningFA allows students to play a more active role in management of own learning (Nicol 1997)
Open & Distance LearningWithin ODL environments : Anecessity for Formative Assessment practices.Proactive in FA practices out of need to provide systematic feedback to students.
Formative Assessment and technologiesLearning technologies promote innovative assessment practices and lead to deeper thinking about how tutors conceptualise assessment in higher education (McCormick 2004). Assessment practices have been supported by technology for many years. However…… main focus on developing tools such as objective tests rather than addressing fundamental issues, such as how they can be used to support effective assessment approaches (Nicol and Milligan, 2006).
MethodologyOpen-ended interviews with 20 students to explore perceptions of assessment. Informed content of  online questionnaire that was administered to students within the three ODL environments. In the online survey, students were asked to express their level of agreement to a number of statements about a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative data using also open-ended questions in the questionnaire.
Q31. I am interested in the marks and not in the feedback.
Q24. I would learn more if I received feedback
Q28. The feedback guides me on what I need to do to improve my work.
Q13. I have used a computer to receive feedback
SummaryStudents engagedin FA but not extensively in what we considered as FA. Notion of FA varied e.g. often was equated to ‘continuous assessment’.	Formats of assessment have changed in ODL because of the possibilities new technologies can afford.
Student engagementTarget audience of institutional groups were diverse in terms of perceptions.Students’ attitudes to assessment were not discipline dependent. It was the broad context (the ODL environment) that determined attitudes.Facilitation of feedback mechanisms using computer mediated communication was recognised as a significant component of the assessment process. Majority of learners recognised the challenges in providing a suitably formative environment in these settings. Difficulties in defining their personalised learning environment and the affordances of the tools they used.
Institutional differencesHuge diversity in practices in all three of the environments. From the three environments, two were broadly similar, and they were characterised by consistent elements of good practice. One of the three environments had in place an infrastructure to provide more systematic provision of feedback. In addition, there was in place a framework, which emphasised periodic assessment rather than end of year assessments.
e-AssessmentThe project considered whether current formative assessment practices can cope with emerging technologies. Learning technologies (a fundamental channel of student support) Received favourably, though overall there was no sense of ownership or always a clear perception of purpose regarding the affordances of each technology.
e-Assessment: a range of  technologiesNon-formative: Objective tests (they ‘disagree’ with certain disciplines)
 Model answers received or revealed after students submit an answer, as non-personalised feedback
 Electronic submission of courseworkFormative: Communication tools in VLEs

More Related Content

PPT
CDE Conference 09/02/2009. S Hatzinpanagos. Closing the loop: identifying eff...
PPT
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in Educational technology
PPT
Comparative & non-comparative studies
PPT
Comparative & non-comparative studies
PPT
Formative Ioe July08 SH
PPT
Comparative and Non-Comparative Evaluation Studies
PPT
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in educational technology
PPTX
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient
CDE Conference 09/02/2009. S Hatzinpanagos. Closing the loop: identifying eff...
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in Educational technology
Comparative & non-comparative studies
Comparative & non-comparative studies
Formative Ioe July08 SH
Comparative and Non-Comparative Evaluation Studies
Comparative and non-comparative evaluation in educational technology
Iblc10 making an existing assessment more efficient

What's hot (19)

PDF
2014 e learning innovations conference musabila assessing the virtual learnin...
PPT
James gaynor t&l conference presentation-v4
PPT
Virtual learning environments (VLEs): an evaluation of their development in a...
PPT
Compartive And Non
PPTX
Pg cert lthe assessment 2011 slideshare version
PPT
Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
PPT
Eassessment Bob Rotheram
PPT
PPT
Making An Impact
DOCX
Online Assessment (ASSIGNMENT)
PPT
Cnie
PPTX
Researchsaysls2017
PPTX
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
PPT
Authentic Assessment, Sistek-Chandler & Evans
PPTX
Seeking Evidence of Impact: Answering "How Do We Know?"
PPTX
Enhancers and challenges to impactful mobile learning
PPTX
Models of evaluation in educational technology
PDF
Sara Amin
2014 e learning innovations conference musabila assessing the virtual learnin...
James gaynor t&l conference presentation-v4
Virtual learning environments (VLEs): an evaluation of their development in a...
Compartive And Non
Pg cert lthe assessment 2011 slideshare version
Blended Solutions: Hitting the Sweet Spot of Universal Design for Learning (UDL)
Eassessment Bob Rotheram
Making An Impact
Online Assessment (ASSIGNMENT)
Cnie
Researchsaysls2017
Fall 2011 Online Reviews: An Interactive Approach
Authentic Assessment, Sistek-Chandler & Evans
Seeking Evidence of Impact: Answering "How Do We Know?"
Enhancers and challenges to impactful mobile learning
Models of evaluation in educational technology
Sara Amin
Ad

Similar to Feedback as Dialogue (20)

PPTX
RIDE 2010 presentation - Formative assessment practices in distance learning:...
PPTX
Feedback as dialogue and learning technologies: can e-assessment be formative?
PPTX
Feedback, Agency and Analytics in Virtual Learning Environments – Creating a ...
PPT
Julia Parra Research for VSS 2009
PPTX
Socrative in the Classroom
PDF
A Video Recording And Viewing Protocol For Student Group Presentations Assis...
DOC
Modern Distant Education through Multi media adoption
PPTX
Feedback to students about academic writing_INTEGRITY Project
PDF
On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Perf...
PPTX
Ajman University
PPTX
online assessment during covid19 .pptx
PPTX
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
PPT
Design based for lisbon 2011
PPTX
Assessment for learning
PDF
The Role of Feedback in Continuous Improvement in Schools (www.kiu.ac.ug)
PPT
Student Centered Assessment
PPTX
The integrative learning design framework
PPTX
App pgr workshop3
PPTX
Cloud computing platform for developing assessment strategies
DOC
Journal article critique
RIDE 2010 presentation - Formative assessment practices in distance learning:...
Feedback as dialogue and learning technologies: can e-assessment be formative?
Feedback, Agency and Analytics in Virtual Learning Environments – Creating a ...
Julia Parra Research for VSS 2009
Socrative in the Classroom
A Video Recording And Viewing Protocol For Student Group Presentations Assis...
Modern Distant Education through Multi media adoption
Feedback to students about academic writing_INTEGRITY Project
On Demand: Exploring the Potential of Electronic Feedback on Assessment Perf...
Ajman University
online assessment during covid19 .pptx
Why Do Students Use Lecture Capture?
Design based for lisbon 2011
Assessment for learning
The Role of Feedback in Continuous Improvement in Schools (www.kiu.ac.ug)
Student Centered Assessment
The integrative learning design framework
App pgr workshop3
Cloud computing platform for developing assessment strategies
Journal article critique
Ad

More from University of Newcastle, NSW. (20)

PPTX
Future Ready? Ensuring meaningful work integrated learning for all.
PPTX
Hey, can we get a bit of recognition please? Staff perspectives of the recog...
PPTX
Assessment for Online and Distance Learning: the six critical areas to address
PPTX
Hybrid Learning Spaces (HLS): a contemporary design challenge
PPTX
Moving fully online in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: The good, the bad, ...
PPTX
From Confidence to Creativity - the year ahead for the teaching practitioner
PPTX
Exploring a future focussed framework for institutional digital transformation
PPTX
Learning Design at a Distance ISSOTL 2021
PPTX
The Value of Design Patterns in Designing Online Teaching
PPTX
A three tier model to promote the institutional adoption of learning analytics
PPTX
Visualising Learner Behaviours in MOOCs - Ascilite 2018 presentation
PPTX
Tertiary ICT Conference 2017 - Keynote
PPTX
MOOC design workshop: educational innovation with empathy and intent
PPTX
MOOCs FOR Motivation: Promoting student engagement in higher education studies.
PPTX
Maximising Learning Spaces: technology and design approaches
PPTX
A two box model for technology enhanced learning
PPTX
InFocus 2015: Games, gamification and game-based learning
PPTX
RIDE 2015 Rapid Design Workshop
PPTX
Successful Design Approaches to MOOCs
PPTX
From Carer to Carerplus: Developing Digital Skills in Care Workers
Future Ready? Ensuring meaningful work integrated learning for all.
Hey, can we get a bit of recognition please? Staff perspectives of the recog...
Assessment for Online and Distance Learning: the six critical areas to address
Hybrid Learning Spaces (HLS): a contemporary design challenge
Moving fully online in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: The good, the bad, ...
From Confidence to Creativity - the year ahead for the teaching practitioner
Exploring a future focussed framework for institutional digital transformation
Learning Design at a Distance ISSOTL 2021
The Value of Design Patterns in Designing Online Teaching
A three tier model to promote the institutional adoption of learning analytics
Visualising Learner Behaviours in MOOCs - Ascilite 2018 presentation
Tertiary ICT Conference 2017 - Keynote
MOOC design workshop: educational innovation with empathy and intent
MOOCs FOR Motivation: Promoting student engagement in higher education studies.
Maximising Learning Spaces: technology and design approaches
A two box model for technology enhanced learning
InFocus 2015: Games, gamification and game-based learning
RIDE 2015 Rapid Design Workshop
Successful Design Approaches to MOOCs
From Carer to Carerplus: Developing Digital Skills in Care Workers

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
PDF
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
PPTX
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
PDF
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
PDF
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
DOCX
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Hazard Identification & Risk Assessment .pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
Environmental Education MCQ BD2EE - Share Source.pdf
Complications of Minimal Access-Surgery.pdf
Virtual and Augmented Reality in Current Scenario
HVAC Specification 2024 according to central public works department
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
AI-driven educational solutions for real-life interventions in the Philippine...
International_Financial_Reporting_Standa.pdf
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
OBE - B.A.(HON'S) IN INTERIOR ARCHITECTURE -Ar.MOHIUDDIN.pdf
Cambridge-Practice-Tests-for-IELTS-12.docx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
What if we spent less time fighting change, and more time building what’s rig...
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer

Feedback as Dialogue

  • 1. Feedback as Dialogue: Building Student Engagement with Formative Assessment PracticesStylianosHatzipanagos, King's College London Steven Warburton, King's College LondonSociety for Research into Higher EducationAnnual ConferenceDecember 8th - 10th 2009, Newport, Wales
  • 2. Closing the loop: two projects Exploring policy, teaching practices and tutor and student views in three Open and Distance Learning environments. Investigating the relationship between formative assessment and learning technologies
  • 3. Formative (FA) and summative (SA) assessmentFormative or assessment for learning (Albon, 2003; Wiliam et al., 2004; Nicol & MacFarlane-Dick, 2004; Black, 2005)Duality “SA/FA” may not represent opposite poles of assessment (Hargreaves, 2005; Dylan, 2006)FA is ‘SA with feedback’, which can be used by the learner (Taras 2005)Positive implications for student learningFA allows students to play a more active role in management of own learning (Nicol 1997)
  • 4. Open & Distance LearningWithin ODL environments : Anecessity for Formative Assessment practices.Proactive in FA practices out of need to provide systematic feedback to students.
  • 5. Formative Assessment and technologiesLearning technologies promote innovative assessment practices and lead to deeper thinking about how tutors conceptualise assessment in higher education (McCormick 2004). Assessment practices have been supported by technology for many years. However…… main focus on developing tools such as objective tests rather than addressing fundamental issues, such as how they can be used to support effective assessment approaches (Nicol and Milligan, 2006).
  • 6. MethodologyOpen-ended interviews with 20 students to explore perceptions of assessment. Informed content of online questionnaire that was administered to students within the three ODL environments. In the online survey, students were asked to express their level of agreement to a number of statements about a five-point Likert scale. Qualitative data using also open-ended questions in the questionnaire.
  • 7. Q31. I am interested in the marks and not in the feedback.
  • 8. Q24. I would learn more if I received feedback
  • 9. Q28. The feedback guides me on what I need to do to improve my work.
  • 10. Q13. I have used a computer to receive feedback
  • 11. SummaryStudents engagedin FA but not extensively in what we considered as FA. Notion of FA varied e.g. often was equated to ‘continuous assessment’. Formats of assessment have changed in ODL because of the possibilities new technologies can afford.
  • 12. Student engagementTarget audience of institutional groups were diverse in terms of perceptions.Students’ attitudes to assessment were not discipline dependent. It was the broad context (the ODL environment) that determined attitudes.Facilitation of feedback mechanisms using computer mediated communication was recognised as a significant component of the assessment process. Majority of learners recognised the challenges in providing a suitably formative environment in these settings. Difficulties in defining their personalised learning environment and the affordances of the tools they used.
  • 13. Institutional differencesHuge diversity in practices in all three of the environments. From the three environments, two were broadly similar, and they were characterised by consistent elements of good practice. One of the three environments had in place an infrastructure to provide more systematic provision of feedback. In addition, there was in place a framework, which emphasised periodic assessment rather than end of year assessments.
  • 14. e-AssessmentThe project considered whether current formative assessment practices can cope with emerging technologies. Learning technologies (a fundamental channel of student support) Received favourably, though overall there was no sense of ownership or always a clear perception of purpose regarding the affordances of each technology.
  • 15. e-Assessment: a range of technologiesNon-formative: Objective tests (they ‘disagree’ with certain disciplines)
  • 16. Model answers received or revealed after students submit an answer, as non-personalised feedback
  • 17. Electronic submission of courseworkFormative: Communication tools in VLEs
  • 19. Games that allow monitoring and intervention
  • 20. Audio to canvas opinions/understanding of concepts/issues (audio more meaningful conceptually than video)
  • 21. Tools such as certainty based marking
  • 24. E-portfoliosConclusions Moving towards an understanding of the significance of formative assessment in ODLDevelopment of a conceptual model of formative assessment and how this can be made to work purposefully within the specific constraints of ODL environments.To help academic staff to reflect on and consider a range of different approaches to assessment and improve the use of learning technologies available to better support the teaching and learning process.
  • 25. Find out more:Hatzipanagos, S. and Warburton, S. (2009). Feedback as dialogue: exploring the links between formative  and social software in distance learning, Learning, Media and Technology, 34:1, 45-59DOI: 10.1080/17439880902759919, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17439880902759919Project page at http://www.kcl.ac.uk/learningteaching/kli/research/assessment/