SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Anusha.G                           Saranya.B
     Section A, Second Year             Section A, Second Year
Department Of Management Studies   Department Of Management Studies
      Pondicherry University             Pondicherry University
Final hubspot presentation
Final hubspot presentation
Final hubspot presentation
Type        : Private
Industry    : Internet Marketing
             Web Analytics
             Online Marketing
Founded      : June 2006
Headquarters: Cambridge, Massachusetts
Key people : Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah,
               CEO & Founder
3 skills for inbound marketing
• Compelling content
• Content distribution
• Engage Community

Benefits of Inbound Marketing
• Attaining Marketing Efficiencies
• Sales + marketing = Smarketing
• Building Relationships
• B2B increased 37% inbound and 30% outbound
What Hubspot provides?

• Content Management System
   • Keyword Grader
   • Templates
• Exposure Optimization
   • SEO tools
   • Link Grader
• Lead Tracking and Intelligence
   • Marketing Intelligence analytics
   • Sales Funnel
SALES
FUNNEL
COMPETITOR’S
      Filling the
                                      AREA &
   customer funnel                 MARKETPLACE
• 2009-1000 diverse customer
• Robust website -3,00,000
  unique vistors in 2008
• 8000- Linkedin- Promarketers
• Hubspot TV
• “Cold Calling is for Losers” –
  35000 times
• Salesforce called on all leads
Targeting Segments

• Owners Ollie-68%
  1-25 Employees
• Objective:
  Generate More
  leads (SEO)




• Marketer Mary-31%
• 25-100 employees
• Web consultants
• Analytics and
  reports
B2B vs B2C
                   Interested                   Sophisticated
                     only in                      Web 2.0
  Complex
                      basic                        users
  Business
                    template                                    Highly
Model due to
                                                                performing
   longer
                                                                websites
decision cycle

                     Business                 Business
                        2                         2
                                                                 High social
 Selective
Sales Force
                     Business                 Customer             media
                                                                  presence

                    Derive
                 greater value
                                                 Have web 2.0
                   from the
                                                  consultants
                     lead
                 qualification
Hubspot – Problem Statement

1. Target segments?
                              B2B          B2C
2. Revised pricing ?
3. Are we missing anything?   Marketer
                                         Owners Ollies
                               Mary
Problem 1: Which customers to serve
Owner Ollies                           Marketer Mary

       Pros                 Cons                 Pros                 Cons

 Easier to Reach      High churn rate-    Lower Churn rate       Harder to reach
                      mainly concerned
                         about SEO        High Revenue per        Longer Selling
   Low cost of        Revenue generated      customers                Cycle
acquisition - $1000         is less
                                          Longer relationship   CMS usage is less
 Basic and simple     Unstable business                            than 2%
    solutions              model
                                            Usage of more       Acquisition cost is
  Shorter Selling                          inbound tools of       high - $5000
      Cycle                                    hubspot
CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE
                       OO      MM
   Churn rate          4.3     3.2
Average customer      23.36   31.25
       life
 Acquisition Cost     $1000   $5000

  Initial amount      $500    $500
  Monthly Profit      $250    $500
Customer Life Time
   Value (CLTV)       5340    11125

        Inference: Towards Marketer Mary
New Customer Acquisition

 Business Type                 Sub-types   Percentage of Customers
                                               (February 2008)
                                B2B>25               6%
New Owner Ollies                B2B<25              56%
                                B2C>25               6%
                                B2C<25              32%
                                B2B>25              41%
                                B2B<25              26%
 Marketer Mary
                                B2C>25              18%
                                B2C<25              16%
                   Total B2B                        65%
                   Total B2C                        35%
CHURN RATE
    BUSINESS TYPE   AVERAGE CHURN RATE
                      (Cancellations per
                         month) in %
                                                Higher Churn
Owner Ollies                4.3                                     Towards CMS
                                                    Rate

Marketer Marys              3.2

Total B2B                   3.3            In 2009, 13% of Owner Ollies went for
                                           CMS and Owner Ollies form 73% of the
Total B2C                   6.0
                                              Customers as of December 2008
CMS                         2.1
                                             B2B segment is found to have the
Non-CMS                     5.5                      least churn rate
Total                       4.1                 Only, 2% of Marketer Mary
                                                        chose CMS
CLTV After Moving to CMS
                     CMS     Non-CMS
   Churn rate         2.1      5.5
Average customer     47.6     18.18
       life                            •   CMS- increases CLTV
 Acquisition Cost    $1000    $1000    •   Transfer costs- $500 offer for free
                                       •   Restrict non-CMS
   Initial amount    $500     $500     •   Prompt to move CMS
  Transfer charge    $500     $500
  Monthly Profit     $250     $250
Customer Life Time
    Value (CLTV)     11900    4545
Recommendations on Target Segments

      OWNER OLLIES
                                         B2B SEGMENT
• 73 percent of the total                                          MARKETER MARY
  customers                      •   B2B greater value
• 56% -B<25 category             •   Long Term Relationship   • Have lesser churn rates
  where only basic tools         •   B2B least churn rate     • Increased lifetime value
  required                       •   68% of the current       • Wide range of Hubspot
• Lesser churn rates -CMS            customer                   products.
• Acquisition cost is 1/5th of
  MM
Recommendations on Target Segments


                          • High Churn rate
                          • Analyze reason
                          • Attractive discounts
                          • Product features be
                            expanded
                          • If log-in is rare,
                            intimate the reasons
                            for poor results
Problem 2: Pricing Model
Problems in Pricing

• Diverse Segment
• Reduce Churn rate
• Pricing for new customer
• Retaining the old customer
Pricing Options for Consideration

• Software as a Service (SAAS)-renewal model

• Charging upfront for the software – locking in the customers
GIVEN PRICING

• Hubspot Owner - $500 consulting fee at start-up and $250/month
 ongoing fee

• Hubspot Marketer - $500 consulting fee at start-up and $500/month
 ongoing fee

• To move to CMS and extra of $500 is demanded.
Recommendations Based on the suggested segments

  Target        Pricing Model
Segments
                                   Initial payment -
                                       MM - $500
Marketing           SaaS               OO - $750
 Mary                              For OO- CMS Monthly- $250
                                       • Every 3 months Package- $750 - $600
   B2B              SaaS               • Yearly package can be offered for
                                         $3000 - $2500

Owner Ollie    Option between
              Monthly and Yearly
                Pricing Model
Based on the following Inference
• Better to go for SaaS
   • low upfront cost for its products.
   • allows customers to pay cheaper monthly instalments
• HubSpot should address those people who rarely log-in to their accounts
• HubSpot’s customers discontinue at 18 months stage.
   • Pricing change-discounts
   • Find reason – high churn rate
Problem 3: IM vs OM
Missing Anything?

• IM - not capture market potential

• Loses a lot of potential revenue that OM can bring in,

• Competitors - both IM and OM

• Market leadership- A question mark?

• Should Hubspot concentrate on both IM and OM?
Implications
• OM UAC – 6 to 7 times higher than IM.
• Hubspot - loses brand Image and loyalty
• Inbound marketing -pull effect
• IM - good awareness about Hubspot.
• More active awareness will give more leads
Suggestions
• Outbound techniques might be partially applied like online
  advertisements
• Logo on the client site
• Need not go into expensive outbound methods like offline
  marketing.
• Outbound techniques might be later used in following
  scenarios
  • For feedback mechanism
  • Subscription suggestions
Current status of Inbound Marketing
             (Hubspot)
• 86 percent to 117 percent year over year in bookings
• 80 percent in MM, 20 percent in OO.
• Towards simple integrated system.
       marketer -> HubSpot
       sales person ->Salesforce.com
• Plan to go public
• Pricing:
      Basic-$200/mo , Professional -$600/mo and for Enterprise -$1000/mo .
      No of Contacts in Database (pricing change as of September 1, 2011)
      Cost for Small/Medium Business: $3,000/yr
      Cost for Enterprise Business: $18,000/yr
      Comparative package based on features.
THANK YOU

More Related Content

PPTX
Hubspot Case Presentation - First Place
PPTX
Hubspot Case Analysis
PPTX
Case Analysis - HubSpot: Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0
PDF
HubSpot - Inbound marketing and web 2.0 case study
PPTX
GTM Strategy: Fitbit Premium Enhance Project
PPTX
SaaStr Annual 2024: Transitioning from Sales-Led to Product-Led Growth and Sc...
PDF
How to create a SaaS BtoB Marketing Plan
PPTX
Software company marketing plan outline
Hubspot Case Presentation - First Place
Hubspot Case Analysis
Case Analysis - HubSpot: Inbound Marketing and Web 2.0
HubSpot - Inbound marketing and web 2.0 case study
GTM Strategy: Fitbit Premium Enhance Project
SaaStr Annual 2024: Transitioning from Sales-Led to Product-Led Growth and Sc...
How to create a SaaS BtoB Marketing Plan
Software company marketing plan outline

What's hot (20)

DOCX
Pilgrim Bank Case Study
PPTX
Tweeter Electronics: Marketing Case Analysis
PPTX
The Fashion Channel
PPTX
Nature view farm case study group submited1
PPTX
Starbucks delivering customer service
PPTX
Metabical - Marketing Case Study
PPT
Metabical Case study
PDF
Mountain Man Brewing Co. Case Study
PPTX
Eureka Forbes Ltd Case Study
PPTX
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
PPT
Signode case study
PPTX
Montreaux (1)
DOCX
Case Analysis - Making stickk stick
PDF
Chase Sapphire Case Study
PPT
Wal-Mart Stores’ Discount operations
PPTX
Virgin mobile USA pricing first time case analysis
PDF
Goodyear: The Aquatred Launch : Harvard Case Analysis
PPTX
Metabical case study analysis
PDF
Rosewood Hotels and Resorts: Branding to increase Customer Profitability and ...
PPTX
Culinarial cookware case study By manpreet singh digital
Pilgrim Bank Case Study
Tweeter Electronics: Marketing Case Analysis
The Fashion Channel
Nature view farm case study group submited1
Starbucks delivering customer service
Metabical - Marketing Case Study
Metabical Case study
Mountain Man Brewing Co. Case Study
Eureka Forbes Ltd Case Study
The Fashion Channel - A case Analysis
Signode case study
Montreaux (1)
Case Analysis - Making stickk stick
Chase Sapphire Case Study
Wal-Mart Stores’ Discount operations
Virgin mobile USA pricing first time case analysis
Goodyear: The Aquatred Launch : Harvard Case Analysis
Metabical case study analysis
Rosewood Hotels and Resorts: Branding to increase Customer Profitability and ...
Culinarial cookware case study By manpreet singh digital
Ad

Viewers also liked (20)

PDF
HubSpot Case Study
PPTX
Strategic Analysis of Hubspot Inc.
PDF
HubSpot Investor Marketing Deck 4q15
PPTX
H4D Lecture 1.5 beneficiaries Stanford 2016
PPTX
Aqualink Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
PDF
Intrapreneurship Through Co-Creation with Startups
PPTX
H4D Lecture 1 stanford 2016
PPTX
Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
PPTX
Narrative Mind week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
PDF
Capella Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
PPTX
Live Tactical Threat Toolkit (LTTT) Week 1, H4D, Stanford 2016
PDF
The Platform Design Tookit 2.0 Draft Launch - Executive Summary
PDF
Key challenges for Startups and how to address them
PDF
IR deck 062617 q1 final
PPTX
How to scale your Startup
PDF
Business Model for Startups
PPTX
What it Takes to Innovate in Large Organizations
PPTX
David Skok's, SMASH Summit NYC
PDF
Mobile Is Eating the World, 2016-2017
PPTX
Tom Tunguz Talk at Wharton San Francisco
HubSpot Case Study
Strategic Analysis of Hubspot Inc.
HubSpot Investor Marketing Deck 4q15
H4D Lecture 1.5 beneficiaries Stanford 2016
Aqualink Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Intrapreneurship Through Co-Creation with Startups
H4D Lecture 1 stanford 2016
Skynet Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Narrative Mind week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Capella Week 1 H4D Stanford 2016
Live Tactical Threat Toolkit (LTTT) Week 1, H4D, Stanford 2016
The Platform Design Tookit 2.0 Draft Launch - Executive Summary
Key challenges for Startups and how to address them
IR deck 062617 q1 final
How to scale your Startup
Business Model for Startups
What it Takes to Innovate in Large Organizations
David Skok's, SMASH Summit NYC
Mobile Is Eating the World, 2016-2017
Tom Tunguz Talk at Wharton San Francisco
Ad

Similar to Final hubspot presentation (20)

PPT
General Assembly Online Retail
PDF
Future Glance: CRO as part of a multi-channel brand strategy to boost convers...
PDF
B2B Marketing in the Age of the Always Addressable Customer
PDF
PHX Media Labs Cybertising ebook
PPTX
Customer Relationship Management (CRM): Theory and Practice
PDF
Inbound Marketing Essentials & Live HubSpot Demo
PDF
Capgemini Digital Marketing Solutions
PPTX
Capgemini Digital Marketing Solutions
PDF
Content Marketing: Enough About Us! Let’s Respect the Audience
PDF
Your Website. What's Possible and What Should You Strive to Achieve? A Case S...
PDF
Mardevdm2 hidden value_of_your_b2_b_marketing_budget_mediapro_01nov2011
PPTX
Systematic Approach to Analyse Your eCommerce Data and Improve eCommerce Busi...
PPTX
Building an inbound marketing architecture
PPTX
Building an inbound marketing architecture
PDF
Presentation on Chapter 14: CRM in E-Marketing [Elegant (VI)]
POTX
How to improve ROI for your B2B Website
PPTX
Level Up With WebEngage
PDF
E-commerce for the Imaging Supplies Industry: Part 2 of 3
General Assembly Online Retail
Future Glance: CRO as part of a multi-channel brand strategy to boost convers...
B2B Marketing in the Age of the Always Addressable Customer
PHX Media Labs Cybertising ebook
Customer Relationship Management (CRM): Theory and Practice
Inbound Marketing Essentials & Live HubSpot Demo
Capgemini Digital Marketing Solutions
Capgemini Digital Marketing Solutions
Content Marketing: Enough About Us! Let’s Respect the Audience
Your Website. What's Possible and What Should You Strive to Achieve? A Case S...
Mardevdm2 hidden value_of_your_b2_b_marketing_budget_mediapro_01nov2011
Systematic Approach to Analyse Your eCommerce Data and Improve eCommerce Busi...
Building an inbound marketing architecture
Building an inbound marketing architecture
Presentation on Chapter 14: CRM in E-Marketing [Elegant (VI)]
How to improve ROI for your B2B Website
Level Up With WebEngage
E-commerce for the Imaging Supplies Industry: Part 2 of 3

Final hubspot presentation

  • 1. Anusha.G Saranya.B Section A, Second Year Section A, Second Year Department Of Management Studies Department Of Management Studies Pondicherry University Pondicherry University
  • 5. Type : Private Industry : Internet Marketing Web Analytics Online Marketing Founded : June 2006 Headquarters: Cambridge, Massachusetts Key people : Brian Halligan and Dharmesh Shah, CEO & Founder
  • 6. 3 skills for inbound marketing • Compelling content • Content distribution • Engage Community Benefits of Inbound Marketing • Attaining Marketing Efficiencies • Sales + marketing = Smarketing • Building Relationships • B2B increased 37% inbound and 30% outbound
  • 7. What Hubspot provides? • Content Management System • Keyword Grader • Templates • Exposure Optimization • SEO tools • Link Grader • Lead Tracking and Intelligence • Marketing Intelligence analytics • Sales Funnel
  • 9. COMPETITOR’S Filling the AREA & customer funnel MARKETPLACE • 2009-1000 diverse customer • Robust website -3,00,000 unique vistors in 2008 • 8000- Linkedin- Promarketers • Hubspot TV • “Cold Calling is for Losers” – 35000 times • Salesforce called on all leads
  • 10. Targeting Segments • Owners Ollie-68% 1-25 Employees • Objective: Generate More leads (SEO) • Marketer Mary-31% • 25-100 employees • Web consultants • Analytics and reports
  • 11. B2B vs B2C Interested Sophisticated only in Web 2.0 Complex basic users Business template Highly Model due to performing longer websites decision cycle Business Business 2 2 High social Selective Sales Force Business Customer media presence Derive greater value Have web 2.0 from the consultants lead qualification
  • 12. Hubspot – Problem Statement 1. Target segments? B2B B2C 2. Revised pricing ? 3. Are we missing anything? Marketer Owners Ollies Mary
  • 13. Problem 1: Which customers to serve
  • 14. Owner Ollies Marketer Mary Pros Cons Pros Cons Easier to Reach High churn rate- Lower Churn rate Harder to reach mainly concerned about SEO High Revenue per Longer Selling Low cost of Revenue generated customers Cycle acquisition - $1000 is less Longer relationship CMS usage is less Basic and simple Unstable business than 2% solutions model Usage of more Acquisition cost is Shorter Selling inbound tools of high - $5000 Cycle hubspot
  • 15. CUSTOMER LIFETIME VALUE OO MM Churn rate 4.3 3.2 Average customer 23.36 31.25 life Acquisition Cost $1000 $5000 Initial amount $500 $500 Monthly Profit $250 $500 Customer Life Time Value (CLTV) 5340 11125 Inference: Towards Marketer Mary
  • 16. New Customer Acquisition Business Type Sub-types Percentage of Customers (February 2008) B2B>25 6% New Owner Ollies B2B<25 56% B2C>25 6% B2C<25 32% B2B>25 41% B2B<25 26% Marketer Mary B2C>25 18% B2C<25 16% Total B2B 65% Total B2C 35%
  • 17. CHURN RATE BUSINESS TYPE AVERAGE CHURN RATE (Cancellations per month) in % Higher Churn Owner Ollies 4.3 Towards CMS Rate Marketer Marys 3.2 Total B2B 3.3 In 2009, 13% of Owner Ollies went for CMS and Owner Ollies form 73% of the Total B2C 6.0 Customers as of December 2008 CMS 2.1 B2B segment is found to have the Non-CMS 5.5 least churn rate Total 4.1 Only, 2% of Marketer Mary chose CMS
  • 18. CLTV After Moving to CMS CMS Non-CMS Churn rate 2.1 5.5 Average customer 47.6 18.18 life • CMS- increases CLTV Acquisition Cost $1000 $1000 • Transfer costs- $500 offer for free • Restrict non-CMS Initial amount $500 $500 • Prompt to move CMS Transfer charge $500 $500 Monthly Profit $250 $250 Customer Life Time Value (CLTV) 11900 4545
  • 19. Recommendations on Target Segments OWNER OLLIES B2B SEGMENT • 73 percent of the total MARKETER MARY customers • B2B greater value • 56% -B<25 category • Long Term Relationship • Have lesser churn rates where only basic tools • B2B least churn rate • Increased lifetime value required • 68% of the current • Wide range of Hubspot • Lesser churn rates -CMS customer products. • Acquisition cost is 1/5th of MM
  • 20. Recommendations on Target Segments • High Churn rate • Analyze reason • Attractive discounts • Product features be expanded • If log-in is rare, intimate the reasons for poor results
  • 22. Problems in Pricing • Diverse Segment • Reduce Churn rate • Pricing for new customer • Retaining the old customer
  • 23. Pricing Options for Consideration • Software as a Service (SAAS)-renewal model • Charging upfront for the software – locking in the customers
  • 24. GIVEN PRICING • Hubspot Owner - $500 consulting fee at start-up and $250/month ongoing fee • Hubspot Marketer - $500 consulting fee at start-up and $500/month ongoing fee • To move to CMS and extra of $500 is demanded.
  • 25. Recommendations Based on the suggested segments Target Pricing Model Segments Initial payment - MM - $500 Marketing SaaS OO - $750 Mary For OO- CMS Monthly- $250 • Every 3 months Package- $750 - $600 B2B SaaS • Yearly package can be offered for $3000 - $2500 Owner Ollie Option between Monthly and Yearly Pricing Model
  • 26. Based on the following Inference • Better to go for SaaS • low upfront cost for its products. • allows customers to pay cheaper monthly instalments • HubSpot should address those people who rarely log-in to their accounts • HubSpot’s customers discontinue at 18 months stage. • Pricing change-discounts • Find reason – high churn rate
  • 27. Problem 3: IM vs OM
  • 28. Missing Anything? • IM - not capture market potential • Loses a lot of potential revenue that OM can bring in, • Competitors - both IM and OM • Market leadership- A question mark? • Should Hubspot concentrate on both IM and OM?
  • 29. Implications • OM UAC – 6 to 7 times higher than IM. • Hubspot - loses brand Image and loyalty • Inbound marketing -pull effect • IM - good awareness about Hubspot. • More active awareness will give more leads
  • 30. Suggestions • Outbound techniques might be partially applied like online advertisements • Logo on the client site • Need not go into expensive outbound methods like offline marketing. • Outbound techniques might be later used in following scenarios • For feedback mechanism • Subscription suggestions
  • 31. Current status of Inbound Marketing (Hubspot)
  • 32. • 86 percent to 117 percent year over year in bookings • 80 percent in MM, 20 percent in OO. • Towards simple integrated system. marketer -> HubSpot sales person ->Salesforce.com • Plan to go public • Pricing:  Basic-$200/mo , Professional -$600/mo and for Enterprise -$1000/mo .  No of Contacts in Database (pricing change as of September 1, 2011)  Cost for Small/Medium Business: $3,000/yr  Cost for Enterprise Business: $18,000/yr  Comparative package based on features.

Editor's Notes

  • #20: Change the headings