Flooding attack manet

DEFENSE MECHANISM AGAINST
FLOODING ATTACKS ON MANET

Presented by

M. MuthuMeenakshi
Reg.No: 11CS11
Guide : Dr. P. Subathra

1 September 14, 2012

BROAD AREA
• Networks
Network is a collection of hardware
components and computers interconnected by
communication channels that allow sharing of
resources and information.
• Network Security
Network security consists of provisions and
policies adopted by the network administrator to
prevent and monitor unauthorized access, misuse,
modification and network accessible resources.

SPECIFIC AREA
MANET
The MANET(Mobile Adhoc Networks) is a self-
configuring infrastructureless networks of mobile
devices connected by wireless links.
Flooding Attack
The flooding attack is an attack that attempts to
cause a failure in a computer system or other data
processing entity by providing more input than entry
can process properly.


TAXONOMY


LITERATURE SURVEY


NOVEL DEFENSE MECHANISM AGAINST DATAFLOODING
ATTACKS IN WIRELESS AD-HOC NETWORKS(2010)
Methodology
 The Period Based Defense Mechanism (PDM) is used here,
& is used to enhancing the throughput of burst traffic.
Advantage
 It can guarantee the Quality of Service (QoS) of burst
traffic.
Drawback
 When the number of packets per second is high (burst
traffic), AODV cannot process packets because of the
resource exhaustion.

FLOODING ATTACKS PREVENTION IN MANET(2011)
Methodology
 Flooding Attack Prevention (FAP) has been developed,
where FAP refers a defense system against the Ad Hoc
Flooding Attack.
 It analyse the behaviour of intruder and check it by trust
function.
Advantage
 In FAP, the neighbors are categorized into friends (most
trusted), acquaintances (trusted) and strangers(not trusted).
 Therefore it is easily identified.
Drawback
 The Problem is it doesn’t work properly with HIGHER
NODE MOBILITY.

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS
UNDER FLOODING ATTACKS (2011)
Methodology
 The influence of flooding attack on the entire network
performance is analyzed under the circumstances of
different parameters including
i. Number of attack nodes
ii. Flooding frequency
iii.Network bandwidth
iv.Number of normal nodes.
Advantage
 When the number of flooding packets occurs in NIC’s
processing power, most of the packets in the queue are
discarded.

Drawback
 When the frequency of flooding increases, the packet
delays occurs.
 when network resources have been exhausted, with the
increasing frequency of flooding attacks, It results in the
loss of packets with long routes .


HELLO FLOOD ATTACK AND ITS COUNTERMEASURES IN
WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS (2010)
Methodology
 The proposed security framework for hello flood detection
via
 A signal strength method
 A client puzzle method
Advantage
 The Accuracy will be considerly improved, leading to
better understanding and forecasting such phenomena.
Drawback
 In these methods, When the node doesn’t receive any
reply message in a predefined time, it treats sender as a
10 attacker. September 14, 2012

A
TRUST BASED SECURITY SCHEME FOR RREQ FLOODING
ATTACK IN MANET (2010)
Methodology
 The Distributive approach has been proposed to detect and
prevent the RREQ flooding attack.
 The effectiveness of the proposed technique depends on
the selection of threshold values.
Advantage
 When the node identifies that sender is originating
dataflooding, it cutt off the path & send error message.
Drawback
 It get delays to detect the misbehaving node by allowing
him to sends more packet until timeout occurs.

PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS OF FLOODING ATTACK
PREVENTION ALGORITHM IN MANETS (2009)
Methodology
 The performance of trust algorithm is used to test the
adhoc networks to implementing the AODV protocol.
Advantage
 In this method, the unnecessary traffic is reduced and
hence the node able to process the data traffic.
 And also send to the destination node in less time.
Drawback
 This work didn't develop comprehensive models for
security attacks and a trustworthy security frame-work
against all possible security attacks in an ad hoc network. .

IMPROVING THE PERFORMANCE OF PROBABILISTIC
FLOODING IN MANETS (2008)
Methodology
 This paper has proposed the probabilistic flooding
algorithm in MANETs.
 The algorithm determines rebroadcast probability by
considering network density.
Advantage
 The algorithm provides flexibility.
 It is easy to implement with guaranteed message
dissemination.
Drawback
 If the rebroadcast probability p is set to a small value, the
reachability will be poor.

PROBABILISTIC BROADCAST FOR FLOODING IN WIRELESS
MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS (2002)
Methodology
 A purely probabilistic approach has been discussed about
flooding, its attempting to exploit the phase transition
phenomenon.
Advantage
 To maintain high reliability, when inorder to reduce the
number of broadcast packets.
Drawback
 In the mechanism where a system undergoes a small
changes of a given parameter in the system induces a great
shift in the system's global behavior.
 The phenomenon should be extremely cost efficient. 14, 2012
14 September

EFFECTIVE FILTERING SCHEME AGAINST RREQ FLOODING
ATTACK IN MOBILE AD HOC NETWORKS (2007)
Methodology
 A simple rate based control packet forwarding mechanism
has been introduced to mitigate malicious control packet.
Advantage
 The protocol can be made secure against other types of
possible DOS attacks.
 And none of the genuine nodes in the network are wrongly
accused as misbehaving node.
Drawback
 This method does not able to distinguish between genuine
and forged RREQs from the malicious or victim nodes.

MISTRAL: EFFICIENT FLOODING IN MOBILE AD-HOC
NETWORKS (2006)
Methodology
 The Mistral compensating mechanism can support
flooding by a wide range of active applications.
Advantage
 The Mistral compensating mechanism can be applied to
other application where the packet loss is an issue.
Drawback
 It allows only limited simulation modification.
 And the source code can be evaluated with only minor
modifications.

MITIGATING FLOODING ATTACKS IN MOBILE ADHOC
NETWORKS SUPPORTING ANONYMOUS
COMMUNICATIONS (2006)
Methodology
 Anonymous Secure Routing (ASR) protocol was considered
 It analyze how an attacker can severely degrade the
performance of the network.
Advantage
 It can effectively identify and eliminate the nodes that are
flooding the network.
Drawback
 In ASR routing protocol, it is not possible to track back the
source and destination nodes in an anonymous network.

S.NO YEAR
COMPARITIVE STUDY
TITLE AUTHOR EXTRACT
01 2010 Novel Defense Mechanism Hyojin Kim, • PDM mechanism against flooding
Against Dataflooding Ramachandra attacks.
Attacks in Wireless Adhoc BhargaChitti, • Uses Black list by proposed scheme.
Networks. and JooSeo • Processes packets according to
IEEE Transactions on Song, Member, priority in the black list.
Consumer Electronics, IEEE
Vol.56, No. 2, May2010

02 2011 Flooding Attacks Ms. Neetu Singh • A distributive approach to identified
Prevention in MANET. Chouhan, Ms. and prevent the flooding attack.
International Journal of Shweta • Prevents flooding attack in AODV
Computer Technology and Yadav. Protocol.
Electronics Engineering
(IJCTEE) Volume 1,Issue 3

03 2011 Performance analysis of Ping Yi , Futai • Effect of flooding attack on the
MANETs under flooding Zou, YanZou , performance of them is analyzed.
attacks. Journal of Systems and Zhiyang • Analysis is done under differ
Engineering & Electronics Wang circumstances.
Vol.22, No. 2, April 2011.

S.NO YEAR TITLE AUTHOR EXTRACT
04 2010 Hello Flood Attack and its Virendra Pal • The Signal strength and Client puzzle
Counterme-asures in WSNs. Singh, method uses for attack detection.
IJCSI International Journal Sweta Jain • Nodes have been classified as friend and
of Computer Science Issues, and Jyoti stranger based on the signal strength.
Vol. 7, Issue 3, No 11, May Singhai
2010

05 2010 A Trust Based Security Shishir K. • A novel technique uses to mitigate the
Scheme for RREQ Flooding Shandilya effect of RREQ flooding attack.
Attack in MANET. Sunita Sahu. • Using trust estimation function in DSR
International Journal of on demand routing protocol.
Computer Applns. Vol5 • Presents a distributive approach in them.
No.12, Aug2010

06 2009 Performance Analysis Revathi • It addresses trust evaluation in ad hoc
of Flooding Attack Venkatara- networks.
Prevention Algori-thm in man, M. • It based on the extent of friendship
MANETs. World Academy Pushpalatha, between the nodes.
of Science, Engineering and and
Technology. 2009. T.Rama
Rao
19

07 2008 Improving the Perfor- M. Bani • Presents a new probabilistic approach
mance of Yassein, • It dynamically adjusts the rebroadcasting proba-
Probabilistic Flooding M.Ould bility as per the node movement.
in MANETs. Khaoua, L. • It without requiring any assistance of distance
Second Interna-tional M.Mackenzi measurements or exact location determination
proceedings in Univ and devices.
of Glasgow, G12 S.Papanastas
8RZ U.K. iou
08 2007 Effective Filtering Sc- Jian-Hua • A simple rate based control packet forwarding
heme against RREQ Song, Fan mechanism was introduced.
Flooding Attack in Hong , Yu • Used to mitigate malicious control packet
MANETs.Internation Zhang. floods. A distrusted filtering mechanism is
al proceedings on proposed to mitigate the loss of throughput.
net-works in
Huazhong
Univ. of Science &
Technology 2007.

09 2006 MISTRAL: Efficient Stefan Plis- • An novel approach to flooding compensating for
Flooding in Mobile ch, Mahesh flooding packets that are not rebroadcast.
Adhoc Networks. Balakrishnan • Mistrals compensation mechanism applies to
ACM proceedings , KenBirmn, applications where packet loss is an issue.
20 MobiHoc 06,May Robbert
Florence, 2006 van Renesse


10 2006 Mitigating Flooding Venkat • The flooding and packet drop attacks was
Attacks in Mobile Balakrishnan analyzed that support anonymous
Adhoc Networks ,Vijay Vara- communication.
Sup-porting dharajan, & • The technique has to identify the benign
Anonymous UdayTupak behaviour of expelled node.
Communications. ula,
2006,Proceedings on Elisabeth
Network Macquarie Gaup Moe
University, Australia

11 2002 Probabilistic Broad- Jian-Hua • The proposed mechanism prevents this specific
cast for Flooding in Song, Fan kind of DoS attack.
Wireless Mobile Ad Hong , Yu • It does not use any additional network
hoc Networks. Zhang. bandwidth.
Technical Report •A purely probabilistic approach attempting to
IC/2002 Swiss exploit the phase transition phenomenon.
Federal institute of
Technology (EPFL)
Lausanne,Switzerland

21

BASE PAPER
NOVEL DEFENSE MECHANISM AGAINST DATAFLOODING ATTACKS IN
WIRELESS AD-HOC NETWORKS
AUTHOR : HYOJIN KIM, RAMACHANDRA BHARGAV CHITTI, AND JOOSEOK SONG,
MEMBER, IEEE
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONSUMER ELECTRONICS, VOL. 56, NO. 2, MAY 2010

 The identified problem is, When the number of packets per
second is high (burst traffic), AODV cannot process packets
because of the resource exhaustion.
 The proposed scheme of Period Based Defense
Mechanism(PDM) enhances the throughput of burst traffic
under the data flooding attack.
PROPOSED WORK
 The work is looking forward to use Modified Adhoc
22 Ondemand Distance Vector (MAODV) protocol.
September 14, 2012

CONCLUSION
 In the first phase, by the discussion of about some
flooding attacks and their prevention measures in
MANETs, its going to implement a Period based defense
mechanism, it is also seen that MAODV would give
better results than AODV.
 And in the second phase, the work will aim at
simulating the throughput of the PDM scheme according
to the number of attackers and the number of
transferred packets per second by using NS-2
simulations.


REFERENCES
 A. Jamalipour, "Self-organizing networks [message from the
editor-in-chief]," IEEE Wireless Communications , vol. 15, no. 6,
pp.2-3, Dec. 2008.
 S.-J. Lee and M. Gerla, "Split multipath routing with maximally
disjoint paths in ad hoc networks," IEEE International Conference
on Communications(ICC2001) vol. 10, pp. 3201-3205, Jun.
2001.
 L. Xia and J. Slay, "Securing wireless adhocnetworks: towards a
mobile agent security architecture," the 2nd Australian
Information Security Management Conference 2004 (InfoSec
2004) Nov. 2004.
 M. Al-Shurman, S.M. Yoo, and S. Park, "Black hole attack in
mobile ad hoc networks," the 42nd annual Southeast regional
conference ACM Southeast Regional Conference (ACMSE
2004) , pp. 96-97, Apr. 2004.

 Ming-Yang Su, “ Prevention of selective black hole attacks on mobile
adhoc networks through intrusion detection systems” , Elsevier computer
communication 34 on 2007.
 Yingbin liang, Member, IEEE, H. Vincent Poor, Fellow, and Lei Ying, “
Secrecy Throughput of MANETs Under Passive and Active Attacks “,
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 57, No.10, October
2011.
 Todd R. Andel, Alec Yasinsac , “ Surveying Security Analysis Techniques
in MANET Routing Protocols “, the 4th quarter 2007, Volume 9, No.4,
October 2007.
 Charles E. Perkins and Elizabeth M.Royer, “ Adhoc On-Demand Distance
Vector Routing” , the Second international conference ACMSE, Jan.
2000.
 Panagiotics Padadimitratos , Member, IEEE, Zygmunt J.Hass, “ Secure
Data Communication in Mobile Adhoc Networks” , IEEE Journal on
25 Selected Areas in Communications, Vol.24, No.2, Febryary 2006. 2012
September 14,

THANK YOU


Flooding attack manet

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Similar to Flooding attack manet (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

Flooding attack manet