Form Miming Meaning Conicity In Language And Literature Max Nnny Ed
Form Miming Meaning Conicity In Language And Literature Max Nnny Ed
Form Miming Meaning Conicity In Language And Literature Max Nnny Ed
Form Miming Meaning Conicity In Language And Literature Max Nnny Ed
1. Form Miming Meaning Conicity In Language And
Literature Max Nnny Ed download
https://ebookbell.com/product/form-miming-meaning-conicity-in-
language-and-literature-max-nnny-ed-2523608
Explore and download more ebooks at ebookbell.com
2. Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.
Methods For Mining And Summarizing Text Conversations 1st Giuseppe
Carenini
https://ebookbell.com/product/methods-for-mining-and-summarizing-text-
conversations-1st-giuseppe-carenini-2403812
Project Management For Mining 2nd Edition Robin J Hickson Terry L Owen
https://ebookbell.com/product/project-management-for-mining-2nd-
edition-robin-j-hickson-terry-l-owen-42226460
Study Guide For The Professional Licensure Of Mining And Mineral
Processing Engineers 7th Edition 7th Edition Society For Mining
https://ebookbell.com/product/study-guide-for-the-professional-
licensure-of-mining-and-mineral-processing-engineers-7th-edition-7th-
edition-society-for-mining-4648196
Transactions Of Society For Mining Metallurgy And Exploration Inc
Volume 328 2010 Society For Mining
https://ebookbell.com/product/transactions-of-society-for-mining-
metallurgy-and-exploration-inc-volume-328-2010-society-for-
mining-4648202
3. Mitigation Of Metal Mining Influenced Water Volume 2 Management
Technologies For Metal Mining Influenced Water Gusek
https://ebookbell.com/product/mitigation-of-metal-mining-influenced-
water-volume-2-management-technologies-for-metal-mining-influenced-
water-gusek-4706726
Statistics For Mining Engineering 1st Edition Jacek M Czaplicki
https://ebookbell.com/product/statistics-for-mining-engineering-1st-
edition-jacek-m-czaplicki-4748396
Management Technologies For Metal Mining Influenced Water Techniques
For Predicting Metal Mining Influenced Water R David Williams
https://ebookbell.com/product/management-technologies-for-metal-
mining-influenced-water-techniques-for-predicting-metal-mining-
influenced-water-r-david-williams-5222714
Project Management For Mining Handbook For Delivering Project Success
Hickson
https://ebookbell.com/product/project-management-for-mining-handbook-
for-delivering-project-success-hickson-5427244
21 Recipes For Mining Twitter Matthew Russell
https://ebookbell.com/product/21-recipes-for-mining-twitter-matthew-
russell-2571362
7. Form miming
meaning
!conicity in language
and literature
Edited by
Max Nanny
University ofZurich
Olga Fischer
University ofAmsterdam
JOHN BENJAMIN$ PUBLISHING COMPANY
AMSTERDAM/PHILADELPHIA
8. TM
00
The paper used in Ibis publication meets the minimum n:quiremenls of
American Nalional Slandard for Information Sciences - Permanence of
Paper for Prinled Library Materials. ANSI Z39AB-1984.
Ubrary orCongress CatalogiD&-in-Publkalion 0.18
Fonn miming meaning: iconicity in language and lilend.lll'e I edikd by
Max Niinny. Olga Fischer.
p. em.
IncludesbibliographicaJ references and index.
I. Philology. 2. konicity (Linguislics) I. Ninny. Max.
II. Fischer.OigaCatharina Maria.
P33.F67 1999
401'AI--dc21
ISBN 00272 21790(Eur.)/l 55619533 8 (US)(Hb:alk. pupcr)
Cl Copyright 1999-John Benjamins B.V.
99-10763
CIP
No part of lhis book may be n:pmdiK.-ed in any fonn. by print. pholoprint. microfilm. or any
other means, wilhout written permission from lhe publisher.
John Benjamins Publishing Co. • P.O.Box 75577 • 1070 AN Amsterdam • Thc Netherlands
John Benjamins Nonh America • P.O.Box 27519 • Philadelphia PA 19118-0519 • USA
9. Preface
Acknowledgements
List of contributors
Table of Contents
Introduction: lconicity as a Creative Force in Language Use
Olga Fiscller a11d Max Niim1y
PART I Geuenl
Why lconicity'!
Ivan Fdnagy
Action. Speech, and Grammar: The Sublimation Trajectory
Jr~hnHaima11
Creating the World in Our Image: A New Theory of Love of
ix
xi
x.iii
37
Symmetry and lconicist Desire 59
RalfNornnan
On Semiolic Interplay: Fonn.o; of Creative Interaction Between
lconicity and lndexicality in Twentieth-Century Literature 83
Jt,lrnJ.White
Iconicity in Literalure: Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century Prose
Writing 109
Sim011 J. Alder.foll
10. vi TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II Sotmd and Rhythm
What, if Anything, is Phonological Iconicity?
Andreas Fi:d1er
Imagination by Ideophones
Hans Heinrich Meier
Iconicity and Beyond in ''Lullaby for Jumbo"': Semiotic Functions of
123
135
Poetic Rhythm 155
Walter Bernhart
PART Ill Letters, Ty-aphy and Graphic Design
Alphabetic Leners as Icons in Literary Texts 173
Max.Niinny
'singing is silence': Being and Nothing in the Visual Poetry of E. E.
Cummings 199
Michael Webster
Iconicity and Divine Likenes.o;: George Herbert's "Colos.o;. 3.3'' 215
Mauhias Ba11er
Iconic Rendering of Motion and Process in the Poetry of William
Carlos Williams 235
Peter Halter
Graphological Iconicity in Print Advertising: A Typology 251
A11drec1s Fisd1er
Iconicity in the Digital World: An Opportunity to Create a Personal
Image? 285
E~·aUa ~·ss
PART IV Word-Formation
Diagrammatic Iconicity in Word-Fonnation
Friedrich U11gerer
Iconicity in Brand Names
/11grid Piller
307
325
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS vii
PART V Syntax and Discourse
On the Role Played by lconicity in Grammaticalisalion Processes 345
Olga Fiscller
Jconicity. Typology and Cognition 375
Bernd Kortmann
11le Iconic Use of Synlax in British and American Fiction 393
Wolfgang G. MUller
Linguistic Expression of Perceptual Relationships: lconicity as a
Principle of Text Organization (A Case Sludy) 409
El:.bieta Tabakowska
Author index 423
Subject index 433
12. Preface
11le studies assembled in this volume reprcsenl a selection of papers lhat were
originally given at the international and interdisciplinary sympo.<iium on "lconicity
in Language and Lilerature', organised by the University of Zurich in co-
operation with the University of Amsterdam and held in Zurich. 20--22 March
1997. To our knowledge this wa.~ lhe tirsl international gathering of both
linguisls and literary scholars to present studies on iconic a."pects in both
language and literature. II can thus be said that the organisers of. and the
participants in, the Zurich conference were nol jusl following a lrend but leading
one. For allhough linguisls have shown an increased interesl in iconicity in the
last decade or so (see the recent MLA-Bibliographies for this). we feelthalthe
symposium and the resulting colleclion of papers in this volume put the interdis-
ciplinary study of iconic dimensions. especially of iconicity in literary texts. on
the map. It is to be hoped that this publication will stimulate new research into
the still largely unploughed but potentially fruitful field of iconicity in both
language and literature.
The symposium and the publication of papers would have been impo.!isible
without the help of institutional sponsors. We should therefore like to express our
deep gralitude for the generous financial contribulions made by the 'Hochschul-
stiftung des Kantons ZUrich' .the 'Philosophische Fakultiitl' and the 'Englisches
Seminar' of the University of Zurich, as well as by the 'Nederlandse Organisatie
voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek' (NWO) and lhe 'Facuheit der Leneren· of the
University of Amsterdam. We should also like to thank the University of Zurich
for iL" hospitality and its logistic help in organising the symposium. We are
especially grateful to Barbara Hess Prusse and JUrg Joss for their unflagging
a."sistance before and during the symposium. and in addition we would like to
thank Therese Lutz for typing one of the papers into the computer, and Jettie
Peterse for her work done on the abstracts.
13. PREFACE
Our thanks also go to Kees Vaes of John Benjamins Ltd. for helping us to
see this volume through the press.
Last but not least, we would like to thank all the contributo~ and participants.
who by their expertise and enthusiasm made the symposium such a success.
M.N. and O.F.
14. Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the following for permission to reproduce copyright material:
Sinclair Stevenson Publishers (David Higham Associates) for Edith Sitwell.
''Lullaby for Jumbo''; W.W. Norton & Company and the E.E. Cummings Trust
for allowing us to use extracb from the Complele PoemJ /904-/962 of£.£.
Cumming-f. edited by George J. Finnage: The Houghton Libr.uy, Harvard
University for allowing us to quote from the manuscripts of E.E. Cummings:
Mss bMS Am 1892.5 (I). bMS Am 1892.7 (219) folder 8 and bMS Am 1823.5
(54): Professor Norman Davies for permission to use the extmct ''Pfalz'' from
E11rope: A Hisrory (Oxford University Press)
15. Contributors
Simon Alderson
Department of English. University of Hong Koog. Pokfulam Road. Hong Kong. SAR.
alderson@hkucc.hku.hk
Matthias Bauer
Englischcs Seminar, Westrli.Jische Wilhelms-Universitii.t, Johannis.~tnwe 12-20. 48143
MUnster. Germany. bauenn@uni-muenster.de
Walter Bemlwt
Department of English. Univcrsitiil Graz. Hcinrichslra.o~sc 36, 8010 Gr.az. Austria.
wa11er.bcmhart@kfunigraz.ac.at
Andreas Fischer
Englisches Seminu, Universiliit Zilrich, Plattenstrassc 47. 8032 ZUrich. Switzerland.
alischer@es.unizh.ch
Olga Fi~~eher
Engels Scminarium, Universiteit van Am.~lerdam. Spuistraat 210, 1012 VT Am.'ilerdam.
The Netherlands. olga.flscher@hum.uva.nl
Ivan F6nagy
Residence La Fontaine, I Square Claude Debussy. Antony 92160. France
John Haiman
Department of Linguistics. Mac:ale!iler College. 1600 Grand Avenue, Saint Paul. MN
55105-1899. U.S.A.• haiman®macalester.edu
Peter Haller
Department of English. Universill!: de Lausanne. BFSH 2. 1015 Lausanne. Switzerland.
phallcr@angl.unil.ch
Bcmd1 Konmann
Englisches Seminar, Albert-Ludwigs-Universiliil Frciburg. Poslfach. 79085 Frc:iburg.
Gcnnany. konmann@ruf.uni-freiburg.de
16. xiv CONTRIBUTORS
Hans Heinrich Meier
Breitenaustrasse 130. 8200 Schaffhausen. Switzerland
Wolfgang G. MUller
lnslilul Rlr Anglislik/Amcrikanistik. Friedrich-Schiller Universilat Jena. Ernst-Abbe-PiaiZ
4. 07143 Jena. Gennany. x7muwo@rz.uni-jena.de
Max Niinny
Englisches Seminar. Universitiit ZOrich. Plattenstra.'ise 47. 8032 Ztlrich. Switzerland.
naenny@es.unizh.ch
RalrNomnan
Department of English. University orTampere PL fiJ7. Kalevantie 4. 33101 Tamperc 10.
Finland, ralr.nonman@uta.fi
Ingrid Piller
Seminar Rlr Englische Sprache und Kultur. Universitiit Hamburg. Von-Melle-Park 6.
20146 Hamburg. Germany. fs7a001 @m.uni-hamburg.de
El.tbieta Tabakowska
Institute of English. Jagiellonian University of Cracow, Mickiewicza 9/11. 31-120
Cracow. Poland. etab@vela.lilg.uj.edu.pl
Friedrich Ungerer
lnslitul Rir Anglistik/Amerikanistik. Univcrsiliit Rostock. 18051 Rostock. Germany.
friedrich.ungerer@philfak..uni-mstock.de
Michael Webster
Grand Valley State University, 129 Lake Huron Hall. Allendale. MJ 49401-9403. US.A..
webstenn@gvsu.edu
John White
Department or German, School or Humanities, King's College, Strand. London WC2R
2LS. Eng:land
Eva Lia Wyss
Deulsches Seminar. Univen;itil. Zilrich. SchOnbcrggasse 9, 8001 Zilrich. Switzerland.
elwyss@ds.unizh.ch
17. Introduction
!conicity as a Creative Force in Language Use
Olga Fischer
University ofAmsterdam
Max Nanny
University ofZurich
Adam's one task in the Garden had been to invent language, to give each
creature and thing its name. In that state of innocence, his tongue had gone
straight to the quick of the world. His words had not been merely appended to
the things he saw. they had revealed their es~nces. had literally brought them
to life. A thing and a name were interchangeable. After the fall, this was no
longer true. Names became detached from things: words devolved imo a
collet:tion of arbitr.uy signs: language had been severed from God. The story
of the Garden. therefore. records not only the fall of man. but the fall of
language (Paul Auster. CityofGia.u. 70).
There seems to be an innate iconic streak in us that makes us somehow feel or
believe that there is a direct link between a word or name (the 'signifier') and
the object or concept (the 'signified') it stands for. Following Paul Auster's
mythical interpretation in the above excerpt from his City of Gla.~s. we may
construe this latent streak as a relic of a prelapsarian innocence, a primeval state
when the signifier and the signified were still. in Auster's words. "interchange-
able". According to this mythical view. the Edenic innocence of iconic significa-
tion was destroyed by the Fall. which led to the babelisation or equally fatal Fall
of language: for Adam's pristine language fell apart into a plurality of different
languages. This had the effect that the same meaning wa.o; now expressed by
different linguistic signs: "words devolved into a collection of arbitrary signs".
Auster's fictional myth belongs to the tradition of what Simpson (1978: 662) refers
to a.o; the "natural language fantasy". i.e. the fanta.o;y that ·nature' had established a
real connection between signs and the things they signify.
18. xvi INTRODUCfiON
One late literary reflection of the ··natural language fantasy" may be found
in Modernist efforts at renewing poetry by going back to the archaic or piclo-
gmphic roots of human language. Thus Ezra Pound welcomed (and edited)
Ernest Fenollosa's epochal essay The Chinese Wri11e11 Charat·ter as a Medimnfor
Poetry (1918). asking poets lo adopl an iconic way of writing similar lo lhe one
described in this treatise. In Fenollosa's and Pound"s (largely mistaken) view. the
Chinese written character is basically an iconic pictogram.
something much more: than arbitrary symbols. It is based upon a vivid short·
hand picture of the operations of nature. In the ... spoken won! then: is no
natural connection between thing and sign: all depends on sheer convention.
But the Chinese method follows natural sugestion (Pound 1964: 8).
Speaking of a "natural conneclion between thing and sign" Fenollosa (an
Emersonian) look up again the long tradition (going back at leasl to the Middle
Ages) of seeing and evaluating everything primarily in terms of similitude or
similarity. Even John Locke, who was the first to use the lerm 'semiotics' and
one of the Modems to shift lhe weight away from the ideal of similarily lo that
of 'difference' (which is at the very centre of all arbitrariness). still spoke of the
'nalural' sign when meaning the iconic sign.
Now Fenollosa. opposing the sculpture of LaocoOn1 to a line from Brown-
ing, also conlra.~ts poelry in general and Chinese poetry in particular with the
western visual arts:
1be untruth of a painting or a photograph is that. in spite of iL'i L"Oncn:tene55.
it drops the element of natural succession. (...] One superiority of verbal
poelly as an art n:sl'i in iL'i getting back to lhe fundamental reality of time.
Chinese poetry has the unique advantage of t."'OI''bining both clements. II
speaks at once with the vividness of painting. and with the mobility of sounds.
II is. in some sense. more: objective than either. more dramatic. In reading
Chinese we do not seem to be juggling mental t."OUntcrs. but to be watching
things work out their own fate (Pound 1964: 9).
Thus. lhe poetic medium of the Chinese wrinen character has the advantage of
being both an iconic image (visually concrete. spatial. vivid) and an iconic
diagram (sounds and ideograms in succession). Today. this semiotic combination
is not just found in film but is typical of such 1wen1ieth-century literary move-
ments as imagism2 and futurism (with iL~ anempt at the combinalion of typo-
graphic space and movement). of the monlage poetry (with its non-linear
sequences of images and scenes) of such Modernist pioneers as Ezra Pound (The
19. JNTRODUCilON xvii
Como.¥). T.S. Eliot (The Wo.¥te Land) and of the later novels of James Joyce
(Uiy.fSes. Finnega1u Wake).
However. the same combination of iconic image and diagram can also be
found in modem literary represenlations of the world generally. For twentieth-
century wrilers had become aware that the literary expression and reflection of
the new metropolitan environment and of a diverse global culture demanded new
devices, new melhods of composition that went beyond mere diagrammatic
narration. So Ezra Pound justified the use of associative juxtaposition or whal he
called the 'ideogrammatic method' by the writer's urgent iconic need of having
to match a radically changed. manifold and complex urban environment - which was
no longer amenable to a simple, linear or merely temporal narrative order- by means
of non-linear, so to speak. spatialised verbal images and compositional devices:
1be life in a small town or village is narrative. in a city the visual impressions
sm;cecd each other. overlap. oven:ross. they are 'cinematographic'. but they
are not of a simple linear sequem:e. They are often a Hood of nouns without
vc:rbill relations ... a species of ideographic representations IPound 1921: 110).
Similarly. in 1923 Eliol. having Joyce's Uly.ues and also his own The Ktls1e
Umd in mind. praised the 'mythical method' (which implies a quasi-spatial
timelessness. simultaneity) over the 'narrative method' (which follows a temporal
sequence of cause and effect) in literary composition. To him, only the 'mythical
method' wa'O "a way of controlling. of ordering. of giving a shape and signifi-
cance to the immense panorama of futility and anarchy which is contemporary
history" (Kennode 1975: 177). As the expressions "shape" and "panorama"
suggest. Eliot was in favour of a method of iconic writing that combined spatial
image with temporal diagram.
Moving from a phylogenesis of language development - from iLo; mythical
origins in ·natural language' to some twentieth-century literary revivals of
pristine iconicity - to ontogenesis. we discover that a natural language fantasy is
also strongly present in children. a." many studies have shown (cf. Slobin 1985.
Pontecorvo 1994. F6nagy 1980, and this volume). II is well-known that children
make much more frequent use of onomatopoeic words than adults. resorting. for
instance,to the sounds made by animals as a name for these animals. Additional-
ly. F6nagy (this volume) shows that children from different language back-
grounds consistently associate certain sounds with particular chardCteristics of the
objects signified. Children are also spontaneous folk-etymologists and tend to
change fonns and meanings of signs in such a way that they become in their
20. xviii JNTRODUCilON
eyes more 'nalural'.1 For instance. Dutch children may refer to the word ro1o11de
'round-about'. as ronlonde. thereby indicating Ihat lhey consider the expression
to have a relationship wilh 'round' (Dutch /ront/ means 'round'). Similarly,
opereren 'lo operate upon' often becomes openreren. because they associate it
with the body that has to be opened up. Adults etymologisc less in this way
because they have discovered lhe arbitrary value of most signs. i.e. they have
come lo learn thai mosl signs are ·symbols' (in the Peircean sensc).4 It is
interesting. however.lhat folk-etymology again may play an active pan once a
sign has for some rea.<wn become opaque. e.g. lhrough infrequency of use.
through language change. or because it is a borrowed word and a." such less
transparent. Thus. the change in the form and/or meaning of words like ho11g11oil
(from OE o11g 11a:gl. a nail that gives 'dislress') and bridegroom (from OE
brydg11ma) occurred because the words ang and grmrcr ('man') had disappeared
from the language.
Anolher way in which children are highly iconic is in how they treat leners
as piclures. as iconic images, before lhey have aclually learned to read and wrile.
Thus, an English child once perceived lhe sign bed as a perfect icon for the
object 'bed': the upright strokes of the 'b' and 'd' functioning as the bedposts
and the circular ·o' anached to the strokes of the b and d functioning as the
pillow (or head) on one side, and the elevalion of the feel on the other. (Poets
are similar to children in this respect. cf. Paul Claudel's pictural interpretation of
locomotil't'. quoted by Niinny. this volume.) Pontecorvo (1994) shows in her
sludy of Italian four- to five-year olds, thai there is a distinct lendency in
children who have not yet learned how to write but have nevertheless developed
a 'sense' of letters louse more (imaginary) letter-signs for the Italian word case
(a plural fonn. 'houses') than for ca.fa (singular, 'house') in spite of the facl lhat
the plural inflection in Italian does not add any sounds/letters but contains the
same number of letters as the singular. In other words, the extra letter-signs lhat
these children produce are iconically motivated, motivated by their perception of
the objects in the 'real' world. In a similar way some children also use smaller
lener-signs to 'write' the word casetta (It. 'little house').
In view of lhe above observations. and in view of the fact lhat lhe ontoge-
netic developmenl of organism." - and perhaps also of such cullural artefacls a-.
language - to some extent may be said to re-enact their phylogenetic develop-
ment (cf. Stampe 1979. but see also Aitchison 1996: 93-94). il is nol surprising
that quite a number of linguisls believe lhal language, bolh spoken and written,
may have started off iconically. Bolinger and Sears (1981: 129) write:
21. INTRODUCI10N
Everything points lo icons as more primitive lhan symbols. Children invent
them. Two speakers without a common language re!IOlt to lhem for communi-
calion. But however vivid the beginnings. lhe color has long siru:e faded to a
unifonn gray ... Language has be<:ome an almost purely conventional code,
with a few exceptions listed as curiosities.
xix
1bese linguists also suggest lhal icons do not play a large part in language
anymore. Indeed, within Saussurean or structural linguistics, the idea that lhe
linguislic sign is essentially arbitrary has long reigned supreme. Similarly. the
advances that were made in historical linguislics by the Neogrammarian school
in the late nineteenlh cenlury were fully based on the notion of the arbitrariness
of lhe sign. However. even the Neogrammarians had to admit that there were
exceplions to their 'sound-laws'. These they listed under the rather vague notion
of ·analogy'. Analogy. as will be discussed below, must be seen as a type of
change lhal is molivaled, a change againsl an iconic backclolh.It seems lhen lhal
in language change. and therefore in language in general. both arbilrary and
iconic rule.o; play a role. Many linguistic signs (or structures) may once have
slarted off as icons, bul in the course of lime they have lended lo become worn
down to mere symbols. (This. however. is not only lrue for language, bul for all
cultural artefacts. a.o; Haiman 1993. among others, has shown.) In language.
however, there is a conslnnl opposilion between economy. which causes linguis-
tic items and structures lobe eroded, lhus becoming convenlional. that is, more
and more 'symbolic' (arbitrary). and the need for ex.pressivity lo counterbalance
the ero.o;ion (cf. Plank 1979, Haiman 1983). This is very nicely expressed by
Langacker (1977: 106-107) in his melaphor of language as a "compacling
machine":
II would not be entirely inappropriate lo regard languages ... a.~ giganlic
expression-compacting machines. They require as inpul a continuous How of
creatively produced expressions formed by lexical innovation. by lexically and
grammatically regular periphrasis, and by the figurative use of lexical and
periphra.o;tic locution.o;. The machine does whalever it can to wear down lhe
expressions fed iniO it. ll fades metaphor.; by standardizing them and using
them over and over again. It attacks expressions of all kinds by phonetic
erosion. It bleaches lexical items of most of their semantic '-'Ontenlo; and fon.-es
them into service as grammillical markers. ll chips away at the boundaries
between elements and crushes lhem 10gether into smaller units. The machine
has a voracious appetite. Only lhe assiduous elforu of speakers - who
salvage whal they can from its output and recycle il by using their creative
22. JNTRODUCilON
energies to fa.o;hion 11. steady Row of new cxprcssioll5 to feed back in - keep
the whole thing going.
Langacker empha."ises the speakers' "creative energies··. h is here indeed that
iconicity comes back in: i.e. iconicity is not just characteristic of an earlier, more
primitive stage of language, but it plays a role whenever a speaker's (or a
writer's) expres.o;ivity is at issue: when, for whatever reason (poetic, practical.
humorous. oul of sheer necessity), he or she is trying lo express himself or
herself anew, in a more concrete or less worn-down form of language.
Hence. we discover iconicity in circumslances in which language is created:
more consciously, as in literary lcxts.5 bul also unconsciously in children's
acquisition of language. in the creolisation of pidgins.6 and (as we have noted
above) in situations in which linguistic structures have become opaque for some
reason or other. have become difficull lo process because of changes having
laken place elsewhere. so that some re-analysis is inevitable.' In all lhese
siluations language users unlea<ih their crealive energies. which. we lhink. involve
iconicity. And as "our linguistic system is inextricably interwoven with lhe rest
of our physical and cognitive selves'' (SweeL'iCr 1990: 6: and see also especially
Haiman. Konmann and Norrman, this volume), with lhe world we live in. we
tend to fall back on our power of imilation. which. according lo Liebennan
(1991: 140-42). is one oflhe most primitive means lhat humans have lhat allows
them lo adapt and succeed in lhe slruggle for survival.
Considering, a" we have noted above, that there are two competing forces
at work in language (that of 'economy' and that of 'expressivity'), it may not
come as a surprise lhalthere have been proposals to dislinguish also two syslems
in language fonnalion or language generalion. Thus,lvan F6nagy ( 1995: 285-86)
has suggested lhat there is a dual structuring of sentences at work. namely a
linguislic and a paralinguiSiic coding. the Iauer involving an expressive transgres-
sion of the regular linguistic rules. In this volume, F6nagy refers to the paralin-
guistic (or "secondary") code a." a "Distorter" or "Modifier". which processes all
linguistic units generated by lhe Grammar (or "primary code"') in live speech.11
Both Grammar and Distorter, however. are rule governed. bul the rules of the
Grammar are symbolic. arbitrary or conventionalised. wherea-. those of the
Distorter are motivated or iconic.
In his The Viole11ce of I...ang11age (1990). Jean-Jacques l..ecercle makes a
similar dislinclion between the rules of gmmmar and the rules of whal he calls
the "remainder". Bolh types of rules are "intertwined" (1990: 130) in the
23. JNTRODUCilON xxi
production of language. but the rules of grammar are normative and have a
general application. while those of the remainder are idiosyncratic. and are
therefore much more difficult to capture in general terms. He sees the remainder
ao; ··ex.ces.o;'' (p. 60), as ''rhizomatic" (p. 128 If.). ao; a locus beyond frontiers (p.
52), that forces us to 'play'. So the rules of lhe remainder are playful. they play
with the normative rules.
1be studies presenled in this volume will explore iconicity from two different
angles. A first group of scholars is especially interested in how far the primary
code, the code of grammar. is influenced by iconic motivation (see Tabakowska
on rules involved in discourse. Ungerer on rules in word fonnalion. and A.
Fischer, FOnagy and Meier on phonological rules) and how originally iconic
models have become conventionalised (cf. 0. Fischer. Haiman, and also F6nagy).
Others go one step further in exploring how. for instance. lhe presence of
iconicity can tell us more about the structure of human cognition (Kortmann,
Ungerer) or how the ''iconicist desire for symmetry" can be related to the
symmetry of the human body (Nomnan). A second group of contributors is more
interested in the presence of iconicity as part of the secondary code. i.e. in how
speakers and writers remotivate or play with the primary code. how they
concretise what has become conventional or how they use fonn to add to
meaning (see Bauer. Halter, Miiller, Niinny and Webster for this presence in
literary texts. A. Fischer and Piller in commercial language. and Wyss in the
electronic use of language).
When Bolinger and Sears suggested (cf. above) that icons do nol play a
large part in language anymore. they were mainly thinking of what we will call
here 'imagic iconicity". However. 'diagrammalic iconicity' (iconicity of a more
abstract kind) is pervasively present in language. especially on the higher levels
of language. as Bolinger (1980: 18) indeed indicated when he wrote: "Arbitrary
and conventional is a fitting description of distinctive sounds. less so of words.
even less of sentences. and beyond that scarcely lit' at all. The larger the scope.
the looser and less arbitrary the system". There is lhus a basic difference
between 'imagic iconicity' and 'diagrammatic it:onicily' (for an overview of the
various types of iconicity that will be distinguished here. see Figure I).
24. xxii
,..,,.;..;,_,.
INTRODUCilON
-!-'""""'"
-laculr
-visuul
.._..l"'"""""j-·-....·~
- l~"'mKII)' uf muti>•lllioo
•~lk ~-mc:lilphurlcugnitic)
ccr.Anuili119K9: 14ff.J j
-mc:lllpburtgnmunuiH:iliJ
-o:emnaiii)"Vs.prnphc:ralily
-llisiJUI~-rlpru••mily
-Kqurntialunkriag
- nwdc:llnc:»
-~prlllll>ft
-unalu;y
-grammlllkalislllitWI
Figure I. Types oficonicily
In imagic iconicity there is a 'direcl'•9 one to one relation between the sign or
signifier (usually a morphologically unstructured one) and the signified.
miaow
signifier
I
slgaified
(direct likeness in sound/word-shape)
'sound made by cal'
In diagrammatic iconicity, such a (vertical) direct, concrete relation between
signifier and signified is missing. inslead lhere exisl"i an iconic link between the
(horizontal) relation(s) on lhe level of lhe signifier and lhe (horizontal) relations
on the level of the signified:
signifier
I
signified
ve11i -1•idi -l'ici
t !
; I
'event'- 'event'- 'event'
(in real world)
foot - foot (of mountain)
l
'body-part'- 'lowest pan of
mountain'
Thus, the temporal relation between lhe events taking place in the real world
may be iconically reftected in the way in which the signifiers naming these
events are ordered on the linguistic level. Such ordering may be lempomlly
sequenlial. as in lhe example from Julius Caesar above, or il may be more
spatial. concerning notions of distance/proximity and centrality/peripherality.
Similarly. in semantic iconicity. e.g. metaphor. it is the sema11tic relation between
the signifier foot and ils signified, and lhe .femanric similarity belween a body-
object such as 'foot' and the lower pan of a mountain. that leads to the same
signifier being used for both.
However, even on the imagic level, iconicity continues to play an important
role in language and especially in literary language. a.'i quire a number of studies
25. INTRODUCTION x;~~;iii
presented in this volume show. The imagic relation may be of an oral. aur-dl
(acoustic) or tactile type (see the contributions in Part II of this volume. and the
general study by F6nagy).10 or they may be of a visual type (cf. the contributions
in Part Ill). The latter is especially prominent in playful and highly creative
language use, such as in poetry and advertising.
As mentioned above and indicated in Figure I. diagrammatic iconicity
consists of two types. structural and semantic. In both the semantic and the
structural type. it is the perceired relation in meaning between two concepts that
leads to the use of the same form or word or the same shape or structure.
Sometimes it also works the other way round (i.e. from form to meaning). but
this is less usual. An example of this would be flaulll and jlm11: for many
speakers they have acquired the same meaning through similarity of form.
Similarly. obsequimu developed into a pejorative term through association with
other ob·signs. which had a negative ring. like ob.ftreperous. obstinate. obnox-
imls. etc. (the last item was also originally non-pejorative).
Semantic iconicity (metaphor) is an important source for the creation of new
words. and a tool constantly resorted to by poets. Again. it plays a very impor·
tant part in language change, since the principle usually called 'analogy' is in
fact an instance of metaphor (see e.g. Anttila 1989: 88. 99). In analogy. too, the
speaker sees a relation in meaning (often grammatical rather than cognitive)
between two items. which may cause him or her to create a new fonn. For
e;~~;ample. the use of -ed in the past tense of originally strong verbs (as in burned
for earlier bam. helped for earlier halp etc.) developed because of the perceived
relationship (in itself arbitrary) between 'pastness' and the 'weak' dental ending
-ed. Again. the other way around is also possible. i.e. a sameness in form may
influence a word's meaning. but this occurs less frequently. An e;~~;ample is the
change in meaning in the Dutch word gijz.elaar 'hostage' (for some speakers
even in martelaar 'martyr') from a passive to an agentive noun. Thus. 'gijzelaar'
for many speakers of Dutch refers to the hostage-taker rather than to the victim.
and 'martelaar' to the torturer rather than to the one tortured. This has happened
on the analogy of the more frequent and still productive pattern. wandelaar.
moordenaar. goochelaar, etc. (i.e. the one who 'walks'. 'murders'. 'juggles').
More recently, the notion of metaphor has been e;~~;tended to explain
unidirectional changes (a type of grammaticalisation) in which expressions used
in the ''content domain" (Sweetser 1990: II), i.e. the real world of objects and
activities. come to serve to express relationships in the speech-act or metalinguis-
tic domain. and from there in the epistemic or rea"'oning domain. Thus. there
26. xxiv JNTRODUCfJON
seems to be an equation between our physical self and our inner self, which
makes us borrow concepts from the socio-physical world. and tr.msfer them
metaphorically to our conversational and reasoning world (cf. also F6nagy,
Haiman and Nomnan, this volume). This transfer, Sweelser believes (1990: 31),
may well be universal. It would explain for instance how root-modals (e.g. OE
mwg expres.~~;ing physical ability), develop into deontic modals (may expressing
social permission. as in Ycm may gtJ), and additionally acquire epistemic meaning
(as in Thi.f may be trlle).
Within structural diagrammatic iconicity two types are usually distinguished:
isomorphism and iconicity of motivation (cf. Haiman 1980. 1985. and this
volume).11 1be fir.n one. Haiman claims. is universal. the second is not. Isomor-
phism means that there is a one to one relationship between the signifier and the
objecllconcept signified. This can be found on the lexical a."i well as the gram-
matical level. It means that Haiman believes that in language the existence of
pure synonyms and homonyms is linguistically pathological: it is not a nonnal
state. Thus. the usc of French de/it in Middle English next to its native synonym.
lu.ft, was occasioned through borrowing. This synonymity. however, was soon
'remedied' through change: /rut and delight are now used in rather different
ways. In the ca.ore of homonyms. the situation is often remedied by replacing
them with other words. E.g. in the homonymous pair qlteen (OE t-win) - q11ean
(OE cwene). the latter has been replaced. Sometimes. an existent variant
pronunciation comes to be used to solve the problem. as for instance with the
originally homonymic pair t•heer and chair (cf. the pun in Macbeth, Arden ed.
V,iii.21).
Similarly. in syn1ax. isomorphism enlails thai one cannot really have
oplitmal differences in surface slruclure. In other words. the old generative tenet
thai several surface structures may have one deep structure, implying that these
surface structures all mean the same (because 1ransfonnations which link deep
and surface structures are meaning-preserving). is not really possible. Haiman
believes that there is complete isomorphism in language. In other words,
exceptions to it are either 1emporary. or are motivated independently. as Haiman
shows convincingly for a number of synlactic cases. II should be added. though.
thai Haiman is more concerned with syntax lhan wilh the lexicon, where such
exceptions create less of a problem as long as the non-isomorphous items create
no ambiguities in communicative situations. That 1here is a strong avoidance of
homonymy among speakers, however. ha.~~; been very convincingly shown by
Samuels (1972: 1441f.). when he discussed the reason why most early Middle
27. JNTRODUCilON XXV
English lei words (e.g. eat.lean. beast) became (i:.) in standard English and not
(e:). Although (e:) would have been historically more regular. the choice of (e:)
would have created a lot more homonyms. Ungerer and 0. Fischer (this volume)
show the role isomorphism may play in the area of word fonnation and syntactic
change: in the studies by Haiman and Konmann isomorphism is pre.'ienl as a
ba.'lic principle in lhe background too.
The other subtype Haiman distinguishes, "iconicily of motivation', is
somewhat less abstract than isomorphism. and therefore more noticeable in the
more concrete language of literature. Haiman's work on this type of iconicity in
"ordinary' language has indeed inHuenced lhe study of iconicily in literary
language. Niinny (1986: cf. also Cureton 1981) has shown thai the same parame-
ters distinguished under 'iconicity of motivation' in Figure I also play a signifi-
cant role in literature. albeit often in a more concrete (more 'imagic') fa.,.hion
(see 0. Fischer 1997: 70-77). Thus the linear sequence of verbal signs may be
used as an iconic diagram to signify succession in time or space, continuity.
change (growth and decay). duration. rank and motion. But syntactic juxtaposi-
tion or typographic arrangement may equally function a.o; iconic diagrams to
express, for instance. symmetry. balance. relative position, fragmentation. etc.
(Niinny 1985). Almost all poetic devices. from typography (Cureton 1986. Niinny
1992). sounds (Epstein 1975. 1978), meter, lineation, stanza-breaks to rhetorical
figures (e.g. chiasmus). as well as a large number of narrative techniques may be
fruitfully interpreted in tenns of their iconic function with the all-important
proviso, however, that the act of interpretation must always proceed from
meaning to fonn (Epstein 1978: 28) and not the other way round.ln this volume.
Bauer. Halter and Webster look at how typographic space and spacing are used
meaningfully in poetry; A. Fischer (in Part Ill) is interested in its use in advertis-
ing: and Miiller shows how repetition, sequential ordering and ellipsis is
iconically used in prose fiction.
Although the temporal relation illustrated in ~·eni. ,·idi. vici. and the meta-
phorical one illustrated in foot above. can both be called inslances of diagram-
malic iconicity. they also exemplify two different types of diagrams: the first
being strictly semiotic in nature (because the diagram connects the linguistic with
the non-linguistic). the second more inlnl-linguistic. Johansen ( 1996: 49ft'.) refers
to this a.'i 'first-' and 'second-degree' iconicity respectively. First-degree iconicity
is semiotic because the order of the signs ~-eni. 'idi. •ici mirrors the order of the
events they refer to in the real world. Intra-linguistic iconicity involves a lower
degree of iconicity because there is no mirroring of any physical or conceptual
28. xxvi INTRODUCTION
structure in the outside world. instead there is a relation of similarity between
lillguistic .~ig11s bac;ed on the fact that the concepts they refer to show some
similarity. To make this difference even clearer. Johansen shows that second-
degree iconicity may also play a role in the ~·eni,vidi.~·ici example (following
Jakobsen's discussion of this). However, this second-degree iconicity hao; nothing
to do with tempoml order but with the linguistic similarity of the signs them-
selves (i.e. all three signs start with the same sound. they have two syllables
containing a consonant and vowel each. etc.). which reftects and reinforces the
similarity between the three activities of Caesar, i.e. the ease of his triumphant
conquest. Meier (in this volume) makes a similar 'degree' distinction in his
analysis of different types of sound symbolism. which he terms primary and
secondary iconicity.1~
When dealing with iconicity, an interdisciplinary approach is almost mandatory.
As literature. indeed all verbal art. consists in an elabomtion. an intensification
and creative exploitation of the inherent qualities of everyday language. a closer
look from a linguist's point of view at how iconicity works in ordinary language
is highly instructive for the literary critic too. But the linguist will also greatly
profit from a critical examination of the literary use of the iconic potential
intrinsic to language, because. as Leech (1987: 68) insists. "it assumes in
literature an importance far beyond that which it hao; in everyday language.( ... !
Whereas iconicity has only a minor role in everyday language use. in literature
it comes into its own as an important communicative device". The fact that
literary iconicity is based on a linguistic potential is just one example of what is
true of literary devices in general. most of which also have their roots in ordinary
language. Thus, Kiparsky (1987: 186; cf. also Attridge 1987: 17) has pointed out that
'figures of language' studied by poetics, such a.~ alliteration, rhyme, parallel-
ism, and metrical form . . and the regularities which may govern their
distribution in a work or body of literature, are !{rtmnded in tile lumumlaii-
!{IW!{e facu/ry.·: this is why lhey always involve linguistic categories of the son
lhat play a role in the grammars of languages. and why the rules governing
lhem obey principles that also apply to linguistic rules and representations.
(ltali<."S added.)
29. INTRODUCTION xxvii
As the quotation makes clear, even metrical fonn. which Jakobson (quoted in
Kiparsky 1987: 193) still thought to be an exclusive device typical of literary
texts. has been shown to be an essential pan of ordinary language a<> well. As
Kiparsky (1987: 194). referring to recent developments in metrical phonology.
writes: "The basic insight to come out of phonology in the study of supra'eg-
mentals is that language itself is metrically organised. By this we mean that
language itself has the attributes which we associate with 'metrical' systems". In
shan. both linguists and literary critics can immensely profit from the research
and iL'i results in the neighbouring discipline.
It is for this reason that we have not placed the linguistic and literary
studies in this volume in separate sections. We have intenningled the two so as
to bring out interdisciplinary similarities. and to show different approaches to a
similar topic. In Part I we have a'isembled papers that are of a more fundamental
nature. They address basic questions concerning the nature of iconicity. its roots
in the human body. its interplay with other semiotic sign categories such as the
index. and the relation between iconicity and ritualisation (or convenlionali-
sation). One paper also ventilates the problem of how best to approach the
phenomenon of iconicity in literary criticism. pleading for a historical approach.
Ivan F6nagy. whose work on iconicity goes back to the fifties and who was
one of the earliest scholars to resurrect an interest in the phenomenon, shows that
iconicity is not something that is marginal to language. but is in fact pan of the
foundation of language (and close to the human body). and a ba<;ic principle of
live speech. in that all linguistic units used in communication pa<>s. as it were.
through an 'iconic filter'. This filter. which has its own externally motivated
rules and principles. modifies the internal. conventional rules of grammar. John
Haiman approaches the subject of iconicity from a rather different angle,
although in his study, too. the human body plays a central role. He looks at how
cenain conventional forms of linguistic behaviour (in this case the linguistic
activity of self-aba'iement) have developed out of earlier physical activities,
which fonn the basis for this behaviour. Or. in other words. how cenain fonns
of physical activity may become ritualised. and then funher stylised and gram-
maticalised in language. This process he has tenned 'sublimation'. He is
interested in how iconicity impoverishes during this process. and panicularly in
how the iconic traces remain visible in the gr-dmmaticalised fonns still in use.
Ralf Norrman's study on symmetry and asymmetry is also closely linked to the
human body. Using a scene from Vonnegut's Slauglrterhou,fe-Fh•e and the text
30. xxviii INTRODUCTION
of the Peyote hunt of the north·Mexican Huichols. he discusses man's innate
symmetricist desire to overcome mortal asymmetry (e.g. of time) by means of
inversion or the enantiomorph. To Norrman this desire is deeply iconicist in
character as it originates in and reflects the basic symmetry of our bodies. On the
level of language this desire is directly expressed in the rhetorical figure of
chiasmus and indirectly manifests itself in the five figures of paradox, oxymoron.
antithesis, irony and ambiguity. John White discusses various and complex fonns
of intemction between the two Peircean sign·functions. iconic and indexical, in
selected texts of twentieth-century literature. He starts with a semiotic interpreta-
tion of literary footprints in Defoe. Eco and H0eg. He then looks at Nabokov.
who thematises semiotic interplay. and at Handke's use of dysfunctional semi·
osis. Next he analyses a Futurist text by Marinelli and its exploitation of the
typogr.aphic interplay between iconicity and indexicality. Finally. he scrutinises
Hare's film Pari.tby Night for indexical iconic elements. Simon Alderson pleads
for a historical frame-working of iconicity in literature. Using a historical
approach. he discusses a number of examples of iconicity in some eighteenth-
and nineteenth-century prose texts. and the limitations of eighteenth-century
literary theorising on iconicity. Starting with Pope's "The Sound must seem an
Eccho to the Sense", he discusses the experimental and piece-meal application of
this principle to prose, as well as Fielding's and Sterne's interest in the iconic
potential of physical book space. He then discusses romantic critics. who began
to privilege the relation between language and mind. Alderson argues that we
ought to consider contemporary expectations about what counts a." reality and the
way literary language can be made to match up to that reality.
Part// contains papers that focus on iconic features connected with sound and
rhythm. Andreas Fischer addresses a fundamental question: how exactly can
speech-sounds be said to be iconic. He distinguishes three different categories of
phonological iconicity: auditory. articulatory and associative. The first is clearly
imagic. the second is both imagic- it imitates spatial or dimensional meaning-
and diagrammatic, because the spatial contra.'ts expressed may be used to express
any kind of contra.'! by a.'sociation. The last category is of a purely diagrammatic
type. i.e. there is no 'mirroring' of sounds. instead the use of certain sounds
depends primarily on how other sounds within the same linguistic system are
used. The relations themselves. however. are clearly motivated (above. this wa.'i
tenned 'second-degree' iconicity). Hans Heinrich Meier approaches the same
question from a historical angle. He first reviews how linguists in our century
31. INTRODUCTION :uix
have tried to ignore and/or belittle the iconic dimension in phonology. In great
detail. he discusses their quantitative Ciconicity applies to only a very small
number of linguistic items") and qualitative objections ("the iconic form is not
fixed and therefore cannot be truly iconic"). showing that their conception of
iconicity is too restricted. Next he turns to linguists of the iconic persuasion.
reviewing the development of their ideas and discussing their use of terminology.
Special attention is given to the use of phonaesthemes in a diagrammatic way. on
both the paradigmatic and the syntagmatic level. Finally. having provided a
thorough classification and analysis of facts. Meier considers the unifying factor
behind them. which is contained in the speaker. in the prod/Ktirm of iconicity.
Turning now from the segmental to the suprasegmental level. we have a
contribution by Walter Bernhart on the semiotic status of poetic rhythm. Basing
his argument on Edith Sitwelrs and William Walton's Farade. Bernhart analyses
the poem's imitative rhythm and sound-elfects as iconic but also as non-iconic.
experiential features: and taking the effect of sound and rhythm on the recipient
into account. he perceives their "emotionally based indexical sign-function".
Part Ill deals with the visual aspects of language and litcr.1ry texts. Insisting that
all iconicity is semantically motivated and distinguishing between tr.msparent.
translucent and subliminal letter-icons. Max Nanny investigates how single
alphabetic letters ('I', ·c· and especially '0'). which have always been seen to
be merely conventional or 'symbolic' signs, have sometimes been used by
mainstream authors since Shakespeare as imagic icons of objects (pillar: crescent:
earth. sun. moon. star. eye. opening) or of concepts such a.'i perfection and
circularity. Michael Webster discusses the iconic means used by E.E. Cummings
in his picture-poems in order to express the notions of 'being' and 'nothing'. He
shows how the poet counterpoints rhythmic patterns to the verbal-visual rhythms
of lineation. Matthias Bauer offers a thorough interpretation in iconic terms of
George Herbert's "Coloss. 3.3". in which nearly every kind of iconic. especially
diagrammatic. representation can be found. pointing out that this pervasive
iconicity corresponds to the seventeenth-century world view. which was con-
trolled by concepts of similarity in all spheres. Bauer's study of one poet's iconic
tendencies covers so much ground that it cannot really be confined to this
section. it belongs to Part II as well. Peter Halter deals with the range and
subtlety of iconic devices in W.C. Williams's 'visual texts', with Williams's
regard for the poem on the page that parallels his interest in the visual arts and
32. XXX JNTRODUCilON
design. On the basis of a close reading of a selection of lyrics. Halter analyses
and interprels iconic renderings of the perception of objects in space (Tabakow·
ska, below. refer.; to this as 'experiential" iconicity), of the saccadic eye and of
the complex interaction of motion and emotion. He also discusses iconic uses of
the stanza form and the lextual mirroring of moments of hesitation. changes of
directions. 'turns'. Andreas Fischer and Eva Lia Wys..., show how a special.
iconic use of typogro1phy ha.'l also reached the world of advertising and the
inlemel. Fischer analyses various examples of how space (including absence of
space) and rypography reinforce the meaning of the texl. Wyss concentrates on
the playful manner in which ASCII signs may be manipulated in e-mail messages to
add to the meaning conveyed by conventional typography. One reason for doing
this, she argues, is that e-mail communication is an intermediary type between
spoken and written lexL-.. in which lhere is a need for fealures of spoken lext lo
be represenled visually. II should nol come as a surprise.lherefore.lhal quite of
few of these new iconic signs have already become conventionalised.
In the fourtlr Part, Friedrich Ungerer turns from the word proper. where iconicity
plays a role bolh imagically and diagrammatically (see Part 2). to word-formation
phenomena. where iconicity is always diagrammatic. eilher of an 'isomorphic' or
of a 'motivaled' type (see Figure 1). All word-formation. Ungerer argues, begins
with a violation of the original signifier/signified (fonnlconcept) correlation. i.e.
a disturbance of isomorphism. But. as Ungerer shows. since the aim in word-
formalion is to produce new l'iahle words, the ultimale resull is a new isomor-
phic relation. He shows how this new balance is achieved or near-achieved in
entirely differenl ways in the formalion of compounds, blends and acronyms.
Derivation is shown to be a different process because here the isomorphism
between the lexical base and the concept it stands for remains largely untouched.
This is also true for clippings even though the form of the lexical base is
affecled. Ingrid Piller is interested in a very specific area of word-formalion. viz.
words that are purposefully created to function a." brand names. This may indeed
involve entirely new words (in which case phonological iconicity oflen plays a
role). bul much more frequently exisling words are used wilh a new signification.
The choice of the exisling word is always motivated; it is in this sense lhal
iconicity is present in the creation of brand names. Piller distinguishes three main
types of diagrammalic iconicily in this area: lhe product is named by means of
(I) foreign or (2) technological words in order lo indicate a connotation with a
33. INTRODUCTION xxxi
certain culture or field of action, or (3) the syntax of the brand name is itself
modelled as an iconic structure.
In Part V. syntax and discourse stand at the centre of a scrutiny from an iconic
angle. Olga Fischer looks at the role iconicity plays in syntactic change, particu-
larly in processes of grammaticalisation. She argues that gmmmaticalisation is
not necessarily a unidirectional process. steered semantically. as is usually
maintained. but that the process may also be reversed. due to underlying iconic
principles. She first discusses a number of general principles that play a role in
grammaticalisation, such as analogy. isomorphism. metaphorical shift etc.. which
are all iconically based. After this she investigates two specific cases of syntactic
change in English, the development of the semi-modal verb have lo. and the
reversal in the grammaticalisation of the infinitival marker lo. in both of which
iconic principles play a crucial role. Bernd Kortmann's study goes a step beyond
iconicity. He starts from the (iconic) assumption that the structure of language in
some way reflects the structure of experience. Based on this idea. he asks
himself the question what a typological or cross-linguistic study of language
structures can tell us about the structure of human cognition. He restricts himself
to one linguistic domain. namely adverbial subordinators. He analyses their
morphology and semantics and makes this the basis for formulating hypotheses
on the internal structure of the semantic space of adverbial relations. Thus. he
finds. for instance. that the simplest morphemic structures correlate with the core
relations of this semantic space, 'core' in terms of discourse necessity and
frequency. Another claim Kortmann makes is that there is a connection between
degrees of morphological complexity and degrees of cognitive complexity.
Wolfgang MUller explores the iconic potential of British and American fiction
discussing the iconic function of ellipsis (which stands for silence. absence of
action). of paratactic and often a:'iyndetic syntax {representing a sequence of
events. simultaneity and emotion. changing processes of perception). He finally
shows analogical relations between the structure of syntax and a novel's overdll
structure. Eli:bieta Tabakowska notes that much research has been done into the
relationship between the way in which linguistic elements are ordered (their
syntax) and the order of human perception. especially in terms of temporal
sequencing. However. the relation between fonn and meaning. between text and
conceptual structure, can also be motivated by the 'order of knowledge'. In fact.
Tabakowska a.'iks the same type of question as Kortmann above, but she wishes
to test her hypothesis not by means of a typological comparison. but by looking
34. xxxii INTRODUCTION
althe way elements are ordered in one particular leXt- a history of Europe. that
ha..; the function of a guidebook as well as a chronicle - where one would expect
perceptual or experiential ioonicity to underlie the text strategy. She shows that
the author of the text in question exploits the conventions of experiential
iconicity in order to impose his own world-view on the reader: that is. he shifts
the experiential principle from the perceptual to the conceptual level.
Notes
I. It is ialeresling dull Fcnullosa n:fcrs lo Laocoon in lhis conleU. for uJso Lessing in his classic
Ltmkoon diKusses lhe ap1nen of lhe dift"erem media. lhe visual arts und lilmdure for lhe
reprcsmlalion of space and time. By arguing thin thr visual arts are betler ~uilftllo represent
spaliuJ ohjccls and lhatlilcrlllure is be5tsuitcd to Cll.pK551imc (d. also Jakob;on 1971a: 341}.
Lessing's dcbale - as has not been generally recognised - was c:ow:nly dclennincd by lhe
principles or llimilarity or. as we now call it. iconicity. Howew:r. in the tweNiech cenwry we
han leamtthat 11. viSWI.I work of art may represent tempor.al processes and a literary text may
have spatial dimcnsioD!i.
2. Pound's definition of the 'imqe' also conlains a temporal dimension: "An 'I~JW~e' is that
which presenl5 on intelleclual and emolionlll complex in on instant of time" (Pound 1954: 4).
1bc briefness of an 'imasc' is meant to be iconic of the briefness of "an instant of time".
3. Such CIISCS of folk etymology are U5ually DOl the result of wtuu we below will call 'first-dcgrft'
iconicity. i.e.they are not i&."Oitic in a purely semiotic: sense.lnnunly in an intra·linJuillic: sense.
4. 1bc development from an ironic to a symbolic phase in children (and bolh in tum pm:c:ded by
on indexical stqe) is also recognized in ~tudies in developmemal and cognitiw: psychology
{e.g. in the worlr. of Je1111 Pillget). as poinled out by Johansen I1996: Js....-40). Howew:r. Johan.wn
notes quite c:orTCCtly that "even the simplest process of sigo intcrpmation necessarily includes
inllcxic:al. iconic: IIOd symbolic aspcclli"" (p. 38). and ttuu recognition of these three dew:lopmcn-
tal phuscs does 1101 mean ''that the two e11.rlicr stages lll't' transitory and lose their importance"
(p. 39).1n this volume. Bemtuut and While reconsider the relation between the three types of
sign. especially the interplay between index and iCOR. in a number of lite~ lell.l5 and in lilm.
1bcy likcwio;c t'OIIt'ludc thai there arc oo "fixed type' or signs·· (Bernhart) or lhat signs tend to
"occur in hybrid ruther than pure (orm" (White).
S. In literature. writers. in onlcr to highlight the 'poetic function' of langu~Je in their texts. haw:
had n:coursc to iconicity to incn:;u;c "the palpability of sipul" (Jalr.obson 1960: 356) 01" to
"hypcrscnwnticize" poctic language (Cun:ton 1980: 319). Among ochers. Leech and Short
(19111b) and Bronzwaer (1993) haw: pointed to the pei'Yasiw:ness of ic:oaidty in literature. It
must be particularly poimed out lha!. the Peirce-Jakobson dislinc:tion betWftll ict1nic imasc and
iconic di~~:nun (sec also below) Jw. pnwcd of great usc when applird to litcnuy texts.
35. ll'ITRODUCTION xxxiii
6. !conicity in pidgins and creoles is highlighted among olhe!'ll by Romaine (1988) and in
e:o;amples given in Haiman ( 1980) and Todd (1984).
7. Plank (1979) and GivtKI (1985. 1994), among othel'll. have wriuen on iconic principles !hat play
a mle in language change, and Fischer (1994) Mows. by means of a case study. how GivOn's iconic
principle of proximity may have functioned in a syntactK: change in the history of English.
!!. FOnagy's use of "primary" and "secondary" code is similar to lhe primary and secondary codes
distinguished by Lotman (1972) (and see also Bmnzwuer 1993: 24[.), However. for Lotman,
the secondary c;ode belongs es.~ntially to the 'poetic function' of lunguuge ('poetic' in its
Jakobsonian sense) and thus is not always present, whereas F6nagy stresses that all live speet::h
is modified by the 'Distoner'. Set::ondly, Lotman·~ secondary code involves both first and
second degR:C konicity (for the tenns see below), i.e. similarities motivated both semiotically
ami purely linguistically, whereas the roles of the Distorter seem to be ba.~ically motivated by
(our interpretation ol) the ouLside world.
9. This 'direct' relation is 0111 without it~ problems. The existenc;e of the relation of cou111e always
depend~ on the illtt>rpretaticm of the speaker. For this reason, Peirce (and this is quite usual in
semiotks. d. NO!h 1990) U5ell a so-c;allcd triadic system. whkh distinguishes between the
signifier (in Peirce's tenns the 'repre.o;entamen'),lhe signified (Peirce's 'object') and the sense
that is made of the sign by the language user (Peirce's 'interpretant'). Becau!lt the konic
relation that i.~ felt to e11.ist i.~ in fact an interpretation on the pan of the speaker/listener. it must
be deur !hat the relation between signifier and signified is not fixed or crystal dear. Jakobson
(1971c: 700) thus corret:!ly remarks that even icon~ are panly symbolic. ''the full apprehension
of pktures and diagrams requires a learning process. No painting is devoid of ideogr.•pbic,
symbolic elenw:nL~", thu~ showing that there is no simple c;ontra.'il between i~'OOS and symbols;
rather, they an: on a cline (for this, see also A. Fisc;her in Set::tion 2 of this volume).
10. And ,o;ee also the very interesting. intenlisplinary c:ollet::tion of studies on Snund Symbolism.
edited by Leanne Hinton, Joanna Nichols and John Ohala (1994), which shows again how
pervasive imagic iconidly still is in language.
II. Giv6n (1985: 188-189) does not follow this distinction. For him. isomorphi.~m is a meta-
principle, underlying konicity, it is not a motivation or explanation of ic:onicity. 0. f'isc:ber (this
volume) argues !hat the motivalion behind the two types i.~ basic;ally the same and !hat therefore
there may be no need to distinguish them.
12. It is imponant to note that Johansen's fil'llt- and :;econd-degree i~'Oflicity, is no! the same as
lyons' 'primury' and 'Set::ondary' iconidty. mentioned by A. fisc:her in his study in Pan II. and
also not the same as Tabllkowdta's distinction. in this volume. For lyons and Tubakowska
primary iconidty is what we have termed here 'imagic' iconicity. Their secondary konicity
involves all diagr.unmatic types.
36. xxxiv INTRODUCTION
References
Aitchison. Jean. 1996. The SeedJ of Speech. Language Origi11 mrd Evolutimr.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Anttila. Raimo. 1989. (2nd ed). Hislorical and Comparalive lingui.{fics. Amster-
dam: Benjamins.
Attridge, Derek. 1987. ''Closing Statement Linguistics and Poetics in Retro-
spect''. In Nigel Fabb et al. (eds). 15-32.
Auster. Paul. 1987. City ofGia.u. Hannondsworth: Penguin.
Bolinger. Dwight. 1980. LLmguage- The Loaded Weapon. London: Longman.
Bolinger. Dwight and D.A Sears. 1981 (3rd ed.). Aspect.{ of LLmguage. New
York: Harcourt. Brace, Jovanovich.
Bronzwaer. W. 1993. Le.{.WI in Lyriek. Nieuwe Nederltmdse Poi!rica. Nijmegen:
Sun.
Cureton. Richard. 1980. ''Poetic Syntax and Aesthetic Fonn". Style 14.4: 318-340.
Cureton. Richard. 1986. "Visual Fonn in E.E. Cummings' No Thanks". m,rtJ &
Image 2: 245-77.
Epstein. E.L. 1975. ''The Self-Reflexive Artefact: The Function of Mimesis in an
Approach to a Theory of Value for Literature". In Roger Fowler (ed.). Style
cmd Struclllre in Literature: E.uays ill rile New Stylistic.{. Oxford: Blackwell.
40-78.
Epstein. E.L. 1978. Language a11d Style. London: Methuen.
Fabb. Nigel, Derek Attridge. A. Dur.mt and Colin MacCabe. (eds). 1987. The
linguistics of Writing. Arguments berween Language and Liierarure. Man-
chester: Manchester University Press.
Fischer. Olga. 1994. "The Development of Quasi-Auxiliaries in English and
Changes in Word Order". Neophilologus 78: 137-64.
Fischer. Olga. 1997. ''lconicity in Language and Literature. Language Innovation
and Language Change". Neuphilologi.{c·he Miueilu11ge11 98: 63-87.
FOnagy. Ivan. 1980. La mhaplrore en plwm!tique. Ottawa: Didier.
FOnagy, Ivan. 1995. "lconicity of Expressive Syntactic Fonnations". In Lands-
berg (ed.). 285-304.
GivOn. Talmy. 1985. "lconicity, Isomorphism and Non-Arbitrary Coding in
Syntax". In J. Haiman (ed.). 187-219.
Giv6n. Talmy. 1994. "Isomorphism in the Grammatical Code: Cognitive and
Biological Considerations". In Rafaele Simone (ed.). 47-76.
37. INTRODUCTION x;v;;v;v
Haiman. John. 1980. '"The lconicity ofGr.tmmar: Isomorphism and Motivation''.
La11guage 56: 515-40.
Haiman. John. 1983. "Iconic and Economic Motivation'".l.Anglfage 59: 781-819.
Haiman. John. 1985a. (ed.). /conicity in Symax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Haiman. John. 1985b. Naftlral Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haiman. John. 1993. "Life. the Universe. and Human Language (a Brief Synop-
sis)". Lang11age Science.~ 15: 293-322.
Hinton. Leanne. Joanna Nichols. and John J. Ohala. 1994. (eds). Sound S)·mbol-
i.mt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jakobson. Roman. 1960. "Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics". In Thomas
Sebeok. (ed.). Style in Language. Cambridge. Mass.: M.l.T. Press. 350-77.
Jakobson. Roman. 197la. "The Relation between Visual and Auditory Signs". In
Selet·ted Writi11g.f. Vol. II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton. 338-44.
Jakobson. Roman. 197lb. "Quest for the Essence of Language [1965)". Selected
Writing.r. Vol. II: Word and Language. The Hague: Mouton, 345-59.
Jakobson. Roman. 197lc. "Language in Relation to Other Communication
Systems". Selected Writing.f. Vol. II: Word and Langlwge. The Hague:
Mouton. 697-708.
Johansen. J0rgen Dines. 1996. "lconicity in Literature". Semiotica 110: 37-55.
Kermode. Fr-dnk. 1975. (ed.) Selected Pro.re ofT.S. Eliot. London: Faber and Faber.
Kiparsky. Paul. 1987. "On Theory and Interpretation".Jn Nigel Fabb et al. (eds).
185-98.
Landsberg. Marge E. 1995 (ed.). Syntactic /conicity and Linguistic Free:.es. Tile
Human Dimension. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker. Ronald W. 1977. "Syntactic Reanalysis". InC. Li. (ed.). Mechani.mu
ofSyntactic Clrange. Austin: University of Texas Press. 57-139.
Lccercle. Jean-Jacques. 1990. The Violence ofLanguage. London: Routledge.
Leech. Geoffrey N. 1987. "Stylistics and Functionalism". In Nigel Fabb et al.
(eds). 76-88.
Leech. Geoffrey N. and Michael H. Short. 1981a. S1yle i11 Fictio11. London:
Longman.
Leech, Geoffrey N. and Michael Short. 198lb. "!conicity: The Imitation Princi-
ple". Chapter 7.7 of Style in Fiction. London: Longman. 233-43.
Liebcnnan. Philip. 1991. Uniquely Huma11. The Evo/wion ofSpeech, Tho11ght. and
Selftes.~ Belun·ior. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Pres.-..
Lotman. Juri. 1972. Die Stmktur literarisclrer Texte. Mi.inchen: Fink.
38. xxxvi INTRODUCTION
Niinny. Max. 1985. "Iconic Dimensions in Poetry". In R. Wa.o;wo (ed.). On
Poetry and PonicJ. Swiss Paper.{ in En~:lisiJ I..AIIf:llOf:e and Literat11re 2.
Tilbingen: Gunter Narr. 111-35.
Niinny. Max. 1986. "lconicity in Litero~.ture". Word & Image 2: 199-208.
Niinny. Max. 1992. "Functions of Visual Form in T.S. Eliot's Poetry". In V.
Sena and R. Verma (cds). The Fire a11d the Ro.{e. New EsJays 011 T.S. Eliot.
Delhi: Oxford University Press. 98-116.
NOth. Winfried. 1990. Handbook ofSemiotics. Bloomington: Indiana University
Press.
Plank, Frans. 1979. "lkonisierung und De-lkonisierung als Prinzipien des
Sprachwandels". Sprachwissen.n·haft 4: 121-58.
Pontecorvo. Clotildc. 1994. "!conicity in Children's First Written Texts". In
Rafaele Simone (ed.). 277-307.
Pound, Ezra. 1921. ··poesies 1917-1920: Jean Cocteau". Dia/10. I: 110.
Pound. Ezm. 1954. Liierary £.~say.~ ofE:ra Pmmd. (Ed.) T.S. Eliot. New York:
New Directions.
Pound. Ezra. 1964. (ed.) Ernest Fenollosa. The Chine.~e Wrillen Character a.~ a
Medium for Poetry. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Romaine. Suzanne. 1988. Pidgin and Creole Ltmguage.~. London: Longman.
Samuels. Michael L. 1972. Lingui.{tic E~·ol11tion. With Special Reference to
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Simone. Rafaele. 1994. (ed.)./conicity in Umg11age. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
Simpson. David. 1978. "Pound's Wordsworth: Or Growth of a Poet's Mind".
£11glislr Literary History 45: 660--86.
Slobin. Dan I. 1985. '"The Child a.o; a Linguistic Icon-Maker". In John Haiman
(ed.). 111-48.
Stampe. David. 1979. A Dissertation on Nalllral Phonology. New York: Garland.
Sweetser. Eve E. 1990. From Erymology to Pragmmics. Metaphorical a11d Culwral
A~pect.~ ofSemantic Stmcture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Todd, Loreto. 1984. Moder11 Eng/i.{hes: Pidgins and Creoles. Oxford: Blackwell.
40. I. lntrocluc:tion
Why Iconicity?
Ivan F6nagy
Hrmgoriun A,·udemy ofScience
Jconicity. far from being a marginal verbal kind of play. is a basic principle of
live speech. and more generally. of nalurallanguages.
Speech units - speech-sounds. words. utterances - are the product of a
dual encoding procedure. All linguistic units - phonemes. lexemes. phrases,
sentence."' - generated by the Grammar have to pas."' in live speech through a
Distorter (or Modifier) conveying complementary messages, integrated into the
original linguistic message. 1be principles which govern observable distortions
are preverbal (gestural, in a broad sense) and pristine. The dialectic play between
Grammar and Distorter ha.~; the capacity of generaling an infinite variety of
complex messages.
I would like to illustrate the functioning of the proposed model of dual
e11ctHli11g in live speech. selling oul from the analysis of an X-ray sound piclure
of emolive speech. allempling to define the principles of expressive diSiortion in
sound production. conceived as oral gesluring. and show the interplay of
iconicity and convention in live speech.
Speet·h melody can be conceived in lerrns of virtual bodily gesluring.
Recurrenl (stained) vocal and prosodic distortions form a vocal mask
(per.folw) reHecting intimate personality lraits 'hidden at the surface'. The
analysis of emotive speech allows for a beuer understanding of lhe elusive
concept of ,ft)'le.
The Distorter of the proposed model operales on all linguist:ic levels.
General rules covering expres..o;ive dislortions can be exlended lo the level of
41. IVAN f6NAGY
syntax. and semantics. and may encompa.o;s even the creative (poetic) use of
punctuation marks.
The guided regression to a preverbal and preconceptual level of verbal and
mental evolution is also the source of d)•11amic S)'nl.:hnmy (liveliness). and the
motor of li11guis1ic cha11ge.
2. Live speech
2.1 Oral ges111ring
Why do we oppose live speet:lr to dead leiters? - "... the written word is but a
scanty reproduction of live speech and lively discourse". objects Phaidra to
Socrates in Plato's dialogue Phaidra (276a).
2.1.1 Oral mimelic.f ill U11rela1ed languages
adio-cinematographic recordings (X-ray pictures) of emotive speech clearly show
that the same basic emotions and emotive anitudes elicit similar phonetic
strategies in unrelated languages. French and Hungarian actresses were invited to
pronounce banal sentences, mostly the same sentence. for expressing different
ba.o;ic emotions - anger. hatred, tenderness. joy and fear; and some emotive
attitudes such a.o; MENACE (F6nagy 1976. F6nagy. Han. Simon 1983). ANGER
and HATRED induce a higher muscular tension in the speech organs; conse-
quently the contact surface between aniculalors in unvoiced plosives (p.t.k) is
larger (sometimes doubled) as compared to neutral speech. The heightened
articulatory effort radically modifies timing. AGGRESSIVE altitudes increase
the durations of consonants (especially of 'hard' consonants. such as p,l, k) and
shorten that of vowels. The fonnula
duration (pJ,k I Vowels)
could offer a reliable measure of the degree of aggressivity.
ANGER and HATRED elicit spasmodic tongue movements - short
transitions are followed by a stiffening of the longue preceding a second short
transition. In TENDER speech, the articulation is smooth: the transitions are
slower. more gradual. In the display of MENACE the recordings show that the
arliculalion of 11 is characterized by a triadic mimetic performance: (a) in a first
pha.o;e the tongue is strongly retracted. the dorsum vaulted 'like a bow': (b) it is
42. WHY !CONICITY'!
maintained in this position: (c) finally projected towards the hard palate 'like an
arrow'. Oral mimicry is particularly striking in the rolled apical Hungarian r
pronounced in ANGER: the tongue is strongly erected. and first resists the
pressure of the outflowing air: deflected from its initial position. it resumes its
erect state four or five times (in neutral speech the tongue vibrates mostly twice).
Electro-myographic measurement of expiratory muscles and tomographic
recordings of the larynx reflect similar gestural strategies: ANGER and HA-
TRED involve a forceful innervation of the glottal muscles. which induces a
narrow constriction of the glottal space (F6nagy 1958. 1962). The vocal folds are
squeezed. the false vocal cords are compresscd.ln spite of considerable expirato-
ry effort the produced sound is generally less loud than the voice generated in
TENDER speech by means of a slight expiratory effort. and relaxed laryngeal
muscles. The ratio
acoustic energy I physiological energy
is considerably lower for agressive emotions than in tender emotions. (It seems
that aggressivity doesn't pay. at least in sound production.)
Let me just mention some further phonetic gestures common to French and
Hungarian emotive speech. as observed through the cine-radiogr.tphic recordings.
The maxillary angle and the vertical labicd distance generally increase in
simulated ANGER. Lips are retracted in both anger and hatred. In TENDER
speech the lips are protruded and rounded. The tongue is advanced for positive
feelings. such as JOY and TENDERNESS. and withdrawn in negative emotions.
such as ANGER. HATRED or SCORN. The tongue is raised in JOY and
lowered in SADNESS or INDIFFERENCE.
2.1.2 Pho11etic paradoxes
The mea.o;urements yield some paradoxical results. A semi-close (mid) vowel
such as e may be closer than the closest i vowel. In the Hungarian i11 'I', in the
indignant exclamation £11.1
." 'I?!' expressing hatred. the mid-vowel comes closer
to the palate - due to tense articulation (contr.tction) - than in the close vowel
phoneme Iii in /gen. pronounced with loose articulation. reflecting indifference
and boredom. This means that a kind of draHi-croist took place.1
43. Hungarian
Phonological level
lei
Iii
IVAN F6NAGY
-->
Phonetic level
Iii
(e(
Similarly. in the French recordings, the ly/, the Ia:/ were dilabialized in faint
anger or contempt, and. in contra-distinction.li/ and /e/ were pronounced (y) and
(cr:( in the display of a tender approach: [mre: sy: ] in Mais si, ~·oymts.'
French
lit
lei -->
(y(
(oe(
Such phonetic paradoxes are quite current in emotive speech.
2.2 A model ofdual encoding
2.2.1 Grammar and Distorter (icmtic encoding)
To account for such phonetic paradoxes I proposed a model of dual encodi11g
procedure in a previous paper (197)).1n a first stage the GRAMMAR produces
a sequence of phonemes. such as Hungarian /e: nJ nT . ligen/ /ge""Ye.'i': or
French /me si vwajO/ Mai.{ si, myon.r. In a second phase. the phoneme-sequence
has to go through a DISTORltR or MODIFIER which transforms lei into (i].
Iii into (e] in the Hungarian unerances: le/ into [oe] and /if into (y] in the French
utterance. Since these sounds are unacceptable in the given context. the hearer
traces them back to the phonemes generated by the Grammar. Thus. for the
French hearer the (oe] in the sequence (m0] moe111 'he grinds' would make no
sense: no more than would .mr. past perfect of suvoir. He automatically re-
establishes /e/, comprehending mais. and /if, comprehending si. and interprets the
distortions as an additional gesture: tender lip-rounding.
SPEAKER
(oe(
(y(
HEARER
lei + tendemes..'i
Iii + tenderness
44. WHY ICONICITY?
1be emotive value of the speech sound is due to the act of distonion and not to
the produced speech sound a.o; such.
The glottal Slop ("1] inserted before or after a vowel in English, Gennan.
French or Hungarian. expresses anger, emphasis or military discipline.
SPEAKER DISTORTER HEARER
/vowel/ -+ ("1 +vowel] -+ vowel + empha.o;is/anger
This is not the case in languages where f1l functions as a phoneme. and is
already present at the in-put. as in Classical Arabic natal 'he loses':
SPEAKER DISTORTER HEARER
f1 +vowel/ -+ off -+ vowel (neutral attitude)
1be naive English or Hungarian hearer might. however. be tempted to interpret
the output signal in the frame of his own phonological system. and perceive
(7ata] as a distorted /atal. A four year old Hungarian girl. watching the TV
interview of an Arabian diplomat, a.o;ked her father. somewhat frightened: "Why
is he so angry?"
2.2.2 Rules ofdi.fWrtion
Both. GRAMMAR and DISTORTER. are rule-governed. However. the rules
governing expressive distortions essentially differ from grammatical rules
producing phoneme-sequences. For instance, rules producing phonetic distortions
are always motivated. i("(mk. Phonemic encoding is always digital (discrete).the
rules of distortion are mostly gradient (Lotz 1950. Sebeok 1952. Scherer 1985).
I attempted in a previous paper (1971) to outline the principles governing
expressive oral gesturing.
I. First principle: Voluntary reprodltctim•ofsymptoms associated with the vocal
apparatus:
Pllaryngeal contraction in negative emotions such as HATRED or CONTEMPT.
may illustrate the first principle. The contraction of pharyngeal muscles accompa-
nies naruea; and may express attitudes derived from nausea, such as DISLIKE
and CONTEMPT (as shown by Trojan 1952. 1975. and interpreted from a psycho-
45. IVAN F6NAGY
analytic perspective by Fenichel. 1946). The French metaphoric cliche Je le 1·omi.{ 'I
hate this chap' (lit.: 'I vomit him') clearly identities contempt and vomiting.
Similarly, laryngeal closure. followed by a violent outburst is a sign of
discomfort in infants. "a glottal attack of discomfort" (Unlu.weimat:.) according
to Gurzmann (1928 (1926]). and can be considered as a biological metaphor of
a cough; a reHex which serves to eliminate under high subglottal pressure
harmful corpuscules. preventing them from entering the lungs. By extension the
reHex appears a" a sign of refusal and rejection. Emphatic glottal plosives could
be seen as symbolic performances of ejecting an internal 'bad object' or rejecting
an unwanted person.
2. According to a second principle. the movements of the speech organs may
substitute for bodily gestures. The French poet and phonetician. Andre Spire.
interprets articulation ao; a "dance of the speech organs" (1986 (1949]).
In the course of language acquisition the movements of the tongue tend to
follow the movement of the hand. Thus. the child produces an i sound by
advancing the tongue. while pointing with his forefinger at an object wanted (as
observed by Walpurg.a Raffier-Engel 1983). A nine month old girl imitates.
inversely. the extrusion of the tongue of the adult by raising her forefinger
(Werner and Kaplan 1963: 86).
The forward motion of the tongue in joy and tenderness may represent a
physical and moral approach to the partner. a friendly attitude (German entgegen-
kommeml 'friendly' lit.: 'coming to meet'). The backward motion of the tongue
in hostile emotions and in sadness corresponds to a physical and moral with-
dr.twal. In contr.tdistinction. the tongue approaches the alveolcs pronouncing /i/
when we are high spirited.
The violent contraction of the tongue muscles may substitute for the
contraction of arm muscles. More generally. muscular contraction on glottal and
oral level may substitute for a violent global effort of the whole body. e.g.. in
preparing for a fight.
Lips and tongue may perform symbolic gestures. The increased maxillary
angle in anger or the incisors biting the lower lip allude to oral aggression: biting
and swallowing. It could be considered as an aBusive gesture. The anticipation
of a kiss in tender lip rounding is equally allusive. Other gestures could be
labeled as emcali·e. Labialization of vowels or palalization of consonants may
recall the speech of small children whose articulation is generally more labial
46. WHY ICONICITY?
and more palatal than those of adults; involuntary mimicking is either symptom-
alic or symbolic.
3. A third principle governing vocal gesturing is quanlitative isomorphism of
expression and content: different degrees of intensity. heighl and duration reflect
different degrees of excitement or semantic inlensity. Speed of utlerance corresponds,
for instance. to different degrees of excitement (Mahl and Schulze 1964).
The presuppositions underlying vocal gesturing have little in common with
conversational maxims (Grice 1975). They are much closer lo lhe way of
thinking reflected in magical performances. The speaker. who in anger or hatred
speaks with a strangled voice. throttles his own throat. inlending to annihilale a
person present or absent. This a.-.sumption is quile similar to those supporting
.Q'mpmhelic or imi1o1it:e magic. The identification of the part wilh the whole (the
speech organs wilh the body) is a basic principle of contagious magic (frazer
1964(1890(: 45. 621f.).
2.2.3 /conicity ond mnl'enlion
Edward Stankiewiecz discusses in his paper on emotive language the emotive use
of phonetic features. He refers to Huichol (Amerindian) adults. who palatalize
('moisten') the consonants in speaking to children: and to Basque. where dental
consonants are moistened in tender speech (1964: 429 ff.). In Spanish. palatali-
zation has a similar connotation (Porras 1978). The moistening of r and I is
perceived in lhe Russian dialect of Kolyma a'i 'sweetish' (parter mielle11.x,
dor~cereux, sladkoglasye). In all these cases. the more palatal pronunciation of
small children may account for the affectionate or sweetish connotalion of
palatalization (little children are so 'sweet').
But how to interpret emotive palatalization in Soulh-Eastern Yiddish
dialects. where moistening of dental consonants and r carries a pejorative
meaning. and reflect scorn and disgust (Siankiewicz 1964: 249)'? This time. we
could be lempted to consider the value of emotive distonion as quite arbitrary.
In fact. there is a simple and close associative link between moistening and
disgust or scorn. We know that nausea gives rise to increased salivation. Disgust
and scorn are biological transfers of nausea. 1be emotional value of palataliza-
tion is entirely motivated. though it has a quite different motivation of that of
'sweelish' speech.
Nasalizalion of vowels frequently reflects boredom (Trojan 1952: 158).
5Uperciliousness or irony (F6nagy. Han, Simon 1983): "it is not worth the trouble
47. 10 IVAN F6NAGY
to raise the velum". The same oral gesture may express longing or desire. since
sexual arousal regularly lowers the velum (Trojan I.e .. Leon 1981).
The two concepts - arbitmry and cmn'elltional - must be kept distinct
when discussing iconicity. All signs are conventionaJ by definition. and may be
more or less motivated (iconic).2
2.3 Voml style
Vocal communication based on voluntary reproduction of symptoms or on
aJlusive partial reproduction of actions are already present in infra-human
communication. The main difference between human speech. on the one hand.
and animal communication and anificiallanguage. on the olher. is the integration
of verbal and preverbal messages in n<~turnl human language. The two messages.
representing two modes of communication separated by some hundred thousand
years. are intimately and pennanently linked in live speech. The links between
phonemic representation. and the two divergent messages are so perfectly
integr.1ted that vocal messages are not perceived as messages in their own right.
The 'way of pronouncing' or mea/style. can be conceived as an originally
independent non-verbal. pre-conceptual message. thoroughly integrated into the
(logically) primary verbal message. conveyed by a sequence of phonemes:' This
definition could be extended to personal vocal and verbal style. conceived as a
recurrent (more or les pennanent) message emined involuntarily by the same
person.(4) A functional interpretation of vocal style in the frame of a model of
dual encoding may facilitate the approach to other levels of verbal style.
2.4 Pro.mdic ge.~turing
Our perception of speech melody is essentially dynamic. We perceive intonation
as a movement. "We could speak of rise and fall. of height and depth". wrote
Aristoxenus (first century A.D.) in his Hcmmmisticfragmems. and he adds: "The
rise is a continuous movement of the voice from a deeper to a higher level, and
the fall is a movement of a higher level to a deeper one'' (Marquard ed. 1868: 15).5
A dynamic theory of intonation is implicitly contained in the Hungarian tenn
hcmglejtb 'intonation', lit.: 'vocal dance'.
We have to distinguish thoroughly between direct laryngeal gesturing at the
glottal level - changes of the glottal configuration. tension and relaxation of
intrinsic laryngeal muscles - on the one hand. and indirect and projective tonal
48. WHY !CONICITY'! II
gesturing by means of virtual spatial pitch movements. on the other: a first and
second degree of symbolization.
Just ao; in the case of oral and glottal gesturing. there are conspicuous
similarities in the expression of ANGRY QUARREL in French and Hungarian.6
In both cao;es. the melodic movement is characterized by a fast pace: a rigid
metrical pattern with equally distributed heavy stresses. which occasionally fall
on a linguistically unstressed syllable. accompanied by sudden rises of a fourth.
fifth or a sixth. The peaks form a virtual straight line, falling in the Hungarian
and ascending in the French quarrel.
TENDERNESS is reflected. on the contrary. by a legato phrasing. weak
stresses. a high degree of melodicity,7 and an undulating melodic line with
smooth transitions. The pertinence of the melodic ductus could be tested by
means of a synthesis of French and Hungarian utterances (F6nagy 198lb).
The dynamic tendencies which characterize the vocal expression of emo·
tions and emotive attitudes transgress the linguistic boundaries. In fact. they go
beyond verbal communication: they penneate musical 'language". We meet with
quite similar configurations in European vocal and instrumental music (Frinagy
and Magdics 1963a).
2.5 Oral gesturing in poelry
Paradoxically. sound shape plays a still more prominent role in poetry than in
every·day speech even though poems have no phonetic dimension, as stated by
Roman Jakobson (1979 (1923) SW 5: 3-121 ). This seems to contradict the high
aesthetic value attributed to sounds in poetry by poets and literary critics. from
Dionysius Halicamassus (1st century B. C.) to Andre Spire {1986(19491).
Non·vcrbal phonetic messages are generated by means of articulatory and
acoustic deviations as compared to neutral speech. A quite similar effect can be
obtained by means of statistical deviances in the frequency distribution of the
phonemes in verse-lines. stanzas or cycles of poems. In live speech the hearer's
expectation is frustrated by a pronunciation contrasting with the non·marked
phonotype. In the case of poetic texts the frequency of vowels or consonants
differs significantly from nonnal distribution. The specific (divergent) distribu·
tion·profile is perceived by the reader as a significant and meaningful distortion.
and it is evaluated in the same way as are the expressive distortions of pronunci-
ation. Expressive nasalization can be mimicked at the phonological level by
49. 12 IVAN FONAGY
increasing the number of nasal vowels and consonants lending lhe lines the
connotation of languorous desire:
Des t'lllacemrnts vai11s et des desirs §Clns nmnbre.
Mnn ombre se fondra ajamais en ton ombre. (Verlaine "Lettre")
1be fronting of articulation. imitated by a high number of front vowels. illumi-
nates Dante's line (''Paradiso" XXX v.47):
Gli spiriti visivi che si priva...
Tense articulation of angry speech is imitated by an unusually high number of
hard (tense) consonants: t, k, r.
Tu fus dur ct sec
Comme un roup de trique.
Tu fus dur et sec
Commc une bourriq11e. (Vcrlainc. ''A Monsieur le Dr.Gnmdm•n")
There are essentially two ways to test the traditional tenet of isomorphism of
expression and content, according to the pllysei principle (Plato, Cratyllu 383a:
42fic.-<:).
PHONETIC LEVEL
na.Q.Iizing vowels
fronling vowels
lense articulation
-+
-+
-+
PHONOLOGICAL LEVEL
more na."al vowels
more front vowels
more tense vowels
Dionysius Halicama.<iseus (1st century B.C.) uncovered lhe secret some lwo
thousand years ago: the poet may oblain the suitable effects by "selecting and
grouping the words appropriately" ( 184S: 274).11
There are essentially two ways to test the traditional lencl of isomorphism
of expression and content. according to the ph)'.fei principle (Plato, Crary/us
383a: 426c-e).
The classical procedure consists in comparing the jreq11ency distributicm of
phonemes in two cycles of poems, contrasting in meaning. written by the same
author. Ba."ically tender and aggressive cycles of Hungarian. as well as Gennan
and French poems show the affinity between ·soft' consonants and tender mood.
between 'hard' consonants (k,t,r) and aggressive poems.9
Alralysis by synthesis is another way to check poetic sound symbolism.
50. WHY !CONICITY'! 13
Instead of setting out from the content and looking for differences in frequency
distribution. we could also modify the sound distribution and see how the readers
will react to the contrasting sound shapes. We cannot modify. however. the
sound-distribution of a poem without changing its meaning distribution and see
how the readers will react to the contrasting sound shapes. unless we choose a
content-free 'poem'. such as one of the pseudo-Hungarian poems written by the
great Hungarian humorist. Frigyes Karinthy. We modified the frequency distribu-
tion in different ways: e.g. by substituting voiced instead of unvoiced conso-
nants. liquids instead of plosives (softening): or on the contrary. substituting
unvoiced for voiced consonants (hardening): constrictives for plosives (spirantiza-
tion). etc. (F6nagy 1980a: 79-80).
3. General principles of dual encoding
The Distorter of the proposed model operates on all linguistic levels. In the
above mentioned previous publication (1971), I attempted to sketch the rough
outlines of an extended model of expressive distortions. These outlines are
essentially based on the tenets of classical rhetorics.! proposed to distinguish two
kinds of expressive distortions: (I) Jynwgmatk rrcmsferJ, i.e. transpositions along
the time axis: and (2) paradigmatic transfer.·, i.e. transpositions in semantic space.
3.1 TranJpo.~itimu (.~_wuagmari£' transfers)
3.I .I Shifr.~ ofstre.u
Expressive shifts of stress - as observed in French emotive speech at least since
the second half of the 19th century - is a good example of syntagmatic transfer.
The shift of stress from the last to the first syllable expressed a strong emotion
- anger. surprise - or simply emphasis: impvHIBie- -IMpo.uib/e I imPO.ui-
ble. or even with two or three stresses in contiguous syllables: IM-PO-SSible.
The emphatic or emotive displacement of stress in Jive speech can be
mimicked in poetic texts. Rhythmical mismatches - divergence of ictus
(metrical accent) and stress (linguistic accent) - may induce the reader either to
shift the stress to an unstressed syllable, or to give prominence to both the
stressed and the metrically strong syllable. Statistical evidence suggests that
metrical conflicts are more frequent in poems reflecting excitement. restlessness
and inner struggle (F6nagy 1981a: 139 ff.).
51. 14 IVAN f6NAGY
3.1.2 Shifts ofpause
11le frequent separation of words tightly welded together by semantic and
syntaclic bounds is frequenl in angry speech, and may be considered as a verbal
equivalenl of lhe tearing to pieces of a sheet of paper.
Similarly. contradictions between prosodic and linguistic articulation of
poetic utterances (FOnagy 1981a: 145ft".) - shifts of the cat.'sura or enjambe-
ment - may suggest irregular speech pauses, emphatic breaks. Such divisions
are significantly more frequent in Verlaine's aggressive cycle of poems, the cycle
lnw!ctil·es lhan in the peaceful Sageue. (In the lllvn:th·es there are 16.8 commas
per 100 words. but only 8,5 in Sagesse.) In the lln•ectil•es even words might be
cut in to two halves by the end of the verse-line:
Autm; que toi que je vais sac-
roger de si belle manihe f...)
'NOI you but others whom 1"11 tear a-
sunder so nicely" (...( ("Puisque ta photographic'', in: Chuir)
1be semantic range of irregular pauses is much larger in poetic texis. In contra-
distinction 10 emphatic speech pauses, run-on lines may be, and generally are,
descriptive in suggesting movemenl (passing over, running),
Sac:he ich die maegde an dcr stlize den bal
ll"erfen.so kacmc uns dcr vogclc schal.
'If I saw the girls in lhe sueel lhrowing
the ball. we should hear lhe warbling of birds."
(Walter von der Vagclweidc. "'Frtlhlingsschnsucht")
or being hampered. ending and beginning. death and rebirth, spatial or temporal
layering (over, below. before, after). halves or pairs (F6nagy 1981a). With the
help of run-on lines poetic utterances become self-representations: the utterance
describes and at the same lime mimes ils proper content.
3.1.3 Clla~rges ofword tlrder
Charles Bally presents in his paper of 1941 'dislocation' as a most characteristic
syntactic feature of Modem French: a typical way to decompose verbal or
nominal syntagms. The subject or object is pulled out of the synlagm and
'propelled'. 'shol forward' inlo initial posilion:
l..cs enfanL-.. suflh de lcs comprc:ndre.
'111c children. jusl lry to undcn;tand them'
(Qucneau. Zu:.ie dan., le Mitro p.l6)
52. WHY !CONICITY? IS
1be propelled noun constitutes a global (monolithic) exclamative utterance.
according to Bally, which is developed and made explicit in the subsequent
proposition (see also F6nagy 1975. Perrot 1978, Lambrecht 1981, Barnes 1985,
Touratier 1993).- In fact. we meet analogous constructions in Greek and Latin,
in Gennanic, in Finno-Ugric languages. in Biblical Hebrew (casus pendens), and
other languages.
It is, at the same time, a child language universal. In the speech of the 1.0
year and 1.3 year old. the utterance starts with a still undivided. global utterance.
which gradually develops into an articulated utterance.ln the speech of the adull.
on the other hand, an articulated sentence falls into pieces through the ejection
of an es.o;ential component, the subject or lhe object. A" a consequence, we meet with
apparently similar structures in child language and Modem French (F6nagy 1975a).
A young woman to her neighbour:
U., ce g~on. regarde ce g~on!
'There. this boy. look at this boy!'
(Peter 1.8 year old: )
'otan 'autoo:t 'nezni 'auto:t
'There. car-Ace look-INf car-Ace'
In an evolutive perspective. we could see in this kind of 'left-shift', dislocation
or extraposition. a syntactic regression to an early level of ontogenesis. From a
functional synchronic point of view, this type of 'syntactic regression' is an ideal
means of topicalization. more generally. of information structuring (Haegeman
1991: 591f.. Geluykens 1992. Perrot 1978. Lambrecht 1981).
Expressive word order;, poetry
This time again. poetic language makes a more extensive use of stylized
analogues of sequential disorder. The shooting forward of a sentence kernel
reflects genuine excitement in one of Heine's la.<d poems:
...fUr dich. flirdich.
Es hat mcin Hert. fUr dich geschlagen!
....ror you. ror you.
My hean was beating ror you!"
(Ut:Je Gedichte)
Isolation of qualifiers (adjectives, adverbs) by means of left shift allows the poet
to represent the gradual elaboration of an idea. elicited by an external stimulus.
53. 16 IVAN F6NAGY
Clear and loud
The village clock tolled six. (Wordsworth. 'Influence of natural objects'')
Dark. Jeep. and cold. the cum::nt Hows
Onto the !;Ca where no wind blows.(... ) (Eliot. ''Plaint")
The embedding of a second proposition into the first one. lryperbatmr. is
considered a figure of sentence in classical rhetorics, i.e. a transformation
producing aesthetic value. Double embedding may serve. as has been showen by
Leo Spitzer (Drei·Kulissen System. 1928) to depict the horizontaJ layers of a
landscape:
Le chciteau,
tout blam:.
le solei! couchC.
ason Hanc,
(Verlainc, "L'aiiCe sans fin")
'The castle. lhe sun going down.
fully white, at its side.
with.'
In the following. the sequence of words mimicks the character's way of walking
in the second pan of Virgil's Aeneid (vv.l56-158): the interruption and restart of
the utterance seems to reHcct the hero's hesitations. who crosses again the
threshold of his house. returning to Troy destroyed by fire. hoping Creusa might
have returned to their home:
lode domum. siforte pedem, siforte tulissct...
'Then I returned to our home. in case she set. in case she might set foot in
the house ... ·
Siforte pedem... the verbal syntagm remains uncompleted. pendent. reflecting an
interrupted movement. Somebody who intended to cross the threshold. hesitates
to take a step. Aeneas sees Creusa in the door. par.1lysed by fear. and then she
overcomes her fear and crosses the threshold.
In all these cases. we have to use a magnifying lens. to retransform slight
verbal irregularities into bodily movements or spatial organization.
Poetic distortions of grammatical word order have nothing in common (at
least in a first approach) with 'movements' described in the framework of
Generative Grammar. Such virtual movements serve to link S(urface)-structure
with the underlying D(eep)-structure. They are necessary in generating grammati-
cal sentences. Consequently. they are. by definition. unable to convey the
54. WHY !CONICITY? 17
secondary mes.'iage due to the distortion of grammatical rules of movement
which serve to account for grammatical word order.
Since grammalical (unmarked) word order is inherenlly molivated (Haiman
1983. 1985: 102-147, 238 If.). expres.<iive or figurative modifications create an
iconicity of the second degree.
3.2 Mow!menu ;, semamic spaL-e: Paradigmalir: trallsfers
Free movement in semantic space is a vital condition for all meaningful elements
of nalurallanguage: lexemes, grammatical morphemes. word-categories. syntaclic
structures, punctuation mark..'i. and even recurrent bound sentences.
3.2.1 Melodk metapl10r.f
(a) Transfer of emolive pallems allow aclors to belie their words. making a
counterpoint to the tex.t.
(b) A typical case of syntactic melodic transfer consists in assigning the pattern
of enumeration to statement'li lhat actually do not contain enumeration: such
transfers generally reflecl a bored allitude and/or imply underlying non-verbal-
ized slatemenl'i such a.~. "and so it goes all the day long".
(c) ModaiiTOIU/ers play a basic role in the expressive use of melodic patterns.
11le most typical metaphor consi!o1s in lending an assertive melodic pattern to
Yes/No questions. It expresses that the speaker knows in fact the answer. and lhe
question is merely formal (a rhetorical question). A modal transfer going in the
opposite direction could be observed in the speech of Hungarian youth in the
fifties. I encounlered the transfer of the illlerrogalil·e pattern to imperalive
sentences in the speech of my nine year old son in the sentence Api, ~jigyelj ~;
'de! 'Daddy. lislen!' The illegal presence of the interrogative pattern generally
corresponded to some unsolved question or problem. Api, gyere ide! "Daddy,
please come!' showing a picture he came across in a book. representing a long
haired young man in armour: ''Is it a girl or a boy?". The semantic structure of
modal intonation metaphor does not differ from that of lexical transfers. and
could be represented as in Figure I (where ? and ! stand for interrogative and
imperalive modalily).
56. Davie, Oliver. Methods in the Art of Taxidermy. 1894, Oliver
Davie & Co., Columbus, O. $10 net.
Gage, S. H. Life History of the Toad. Teacher's Leaflets No. 9,
April, 1898, prepared by College of Agriculture, Cornell University,
Ithaca, N. Y.
Heilprin, A. The Distribution of Animals. 1886, D. Appleton &
Co. $2.00.
Hodge, C. F. The Common Toad. Nature Study Leaflet, Biology
Series No. 1. 1898, published by C. H. Hodge, Worcester, Mass.
Holland, W. J. The Butterfly Book. 1899, Doubleday and
McClure Co. $3.00.
Hornaday, W. T. Taxidermy and Zoological Collecting. 1897,
Chas. Scribner's Sons. $2.50 net.
Howell, W. H. Dissection of the Dog. 1889, Henry Holt & Co.
$1.00.
Huxley, T. H. The Crayfish: an introduction to the Study of
Zoology. D. Appleton & Co. $1.75.
Jordan, D. S. Manual of Vertebrate Animals of the Northern
United States, 8th ed. 1899. A. C. McClurg & Co. $2.50.
---- and Evermann, B. W. Fishes of North and Middle America,
4 vols. 1898-1900, Distributed by U. S. National Museum.
---- and Kellogg, V. L. Animal Life. 1900, D. Appleton & Co.
$1.20.
Lubbock, John. Ants, Bees, and Wasps. 1882. D. Appleton &
Co. $2.00.
Marshall, H. M., and Hurst, C. H. Practical Biology, 5th ed. G.
P. Putnam's Sons. $3.50.
57. Martin, H. W., and Moale, W. A. Handbook of Vertebrate
Dissection, 3 parts. 1881, Macmillan Co.
Part 1. How to dissect a Chelonian (red-bellied slider
terrapin);
Part 2. How to dissect a bird (pigeon);
Part 3. How to dissect a rodent (rat).
McCook, Henry. American Spiders and their Spinning Work, 3
vols. 1889-1893, H. C. McCook, Phila., Pa. $30.00.
Miall, L. C. The Natural History of Aquatic Insects. 1895,
Macmillan Co. $1.75.
Parker, T. J. A Course of Instruction in Zootomy. 1884,
Macmillan Co. $2.25.
---- Lessons in Elementary Biology. 1897, Macmillan Co. $2.65.
---- and Haswell, W. A. Textbook of Zoology, 2 vols. 1897,
Macmillan Co. $9.00.
Peckham, George W. and E. J. On the Instincts and Habits of
the Solitary Wasps. 1898, sold by Des Forges & Co., Milwaukee,
Wis. $2.00.
Potts, E. Fresh-water Sponges. 1887, Phil. Acad. of Sciences.
Poulton, E. B. The Colors of Animals. 1890, D. Appleton & Co.
$1.75.
Reighard, J. E., and Jennings, H. S. The Anatomy of the Cat.
1901, Henry Holt & Co. $4.00.
Ridgway, R. Directions for Collecting Birds. Distributed by U. S.
National Museum.
Riverside Natural History, 6 vols. Houghton, Mifflin & Co.
$30.00.
58. Romanes, Geo. Darwin and After Darwin, I. 1895-97, Open
Court Publishing Co.
Scudder, S. H. The Life of a Butterfly. 1893, Henry Holt & Co.
$1.00.
Van Beneden, E. Animal Parasites and Messmates. 1876, D.
Appleton & Co. $1.50.
Wallace, A. R. The Geographical Distribution of Animals. 1876,
Harper & Bros. $10.00.
Wallace, A. R. Island Life. 1881, Harper & Bros. $4.00.
59. APPENDIX III
REARING ANIMALS AND MAKING
COLLECTIONS
Much good work in observing the behavior and life-history of some
kinds of animals can be done by keeping them alive in the
schoolroom under conditions simulating those to which they are
exposed in nature. The growth and development of frogs and toads
from egg to adult, as well as their feeding habits and general
behavior, can all be observed in the schoolroom as explained in
Chapter XII. Harmless snakes are easily kept in glass-covered boxes;
snails and slugs are contented dwellers indoors; certain fish live well
in small aquaria, and many other familiar forms can be kept alive
under observation for a longer or shorter time. But from the ease
with which they are obtained and cared for, the inexpensiveness of
their live-cages, and the interesting character of their life-history and
general habits, insects are, of all animals, the ones which specially
commend themselves for the schoolroom menagerie. In the technical
notes in the chapter (XXI) devoted to insects are numerous
suggestions regarding the obtaining and care of certain kinds of
insects which may be reared and studied to advantage in the
schoolroom. In the following paragraphs are given directions for
making the necessary live-cages and aquaria for these insects.
Live-cages and aquaria.—Prof. J. H. Comstock has so well
described the making of simple and inexpensive cages and aquaria in
his book, "Insect Life," that, with his permission, his account is
quoted here.
Live-cages.—"A good home-made cage can be built by fitting a pane
of glass into one side of an empty soap-box. A board, three or four
inches wide, should be fastened below the glass so as to admit of a
60. layer of soil being placed in the lower part of the cage, and the glass
can be made to slide, so as to serve as a door (fig. 166). The glass
should fit closely when shut, to prevent the escape of the insects.
61. Fig. 166.—Soap-box breeding-cage for
insects. (From Jenkins and Kellogg.)
"In rearing caterpillars and other
leaf-eating larvæ, branches of the
food-plant should be stuck into
bottles or cans which are filled
with sand saturated with water.
By keeping the sand wet the
plants can be kept fresh longer
than in water alone, and the
danger of the larvæ being
drowned is avoided by the use of
sand.
"Many larvæ when full-grown
enter the ground to pass the pupal state; on this account a layer of
loose soil should be kept in the bottom of a breeding-cage. This soil
should not be allowed to become dry, neither should it be soaked
with water. If the soil is too dry the pupæ will not mature, or if they
do so the wings will not expand fully; if the soil is too damp the pupæ
are liable to be drowned or to be killed by mold.
"It is often necessary to keep pupæ over winter, for a large
proportion of insects pass the winter in the pupal state. Hibernating
pupæ may be left in the breeding-cages or removed and packed in
moss in small boxes. Great care should be taken to keep moist the
soil in the breeding-cages, or the moss if that be used. The cages or
boxes containing the pupæ should be stored in a cool cellar, or in an
unheated room, or in a large box placed out of doors where the sun
cannot strike it. Low temperature is not so much to be feared as
great and frequent changes of temperature.
"Hibernating pupæ can be kept in a warm room if care be taken to
keep them moist, but under such treatment the mature insects are
apt to emerge in midwinter.
"An excellent breeding-cage is represented by fig. 167. It is made by
combining a flower-pot and a lantern-globe. When practicable, the
food-plant of the insects to be bred is planted in the flower-pot; in
62. Fig. 167.—Lamp-chimney and
flower-pot breeding-cage for
insects. (From Jenkins and Kellogg.)
other cases a bottle or tin can filled
with wet sand is sunk into the soil in
the flower-pot, and the stems of the
plant are stuck into this wet sand.
The top of the lantern-globe is
covered with Swiss muslin. These
breeding-cages are inexpensive, and
especially so when the pots and
globes are bought in considerable
quantities. A modification of this
style of breeding-cage that is used
by the writer differs only in that
large glass cylinders take the place
of the lantern-globes. These
cylinders were made especially for
us by a manufacturer of glass, and
cost from six to eight dollars per dozen, according to size, when made
in lots of fifty.
"When the transformation of small insects or of a small number of
larger ones are to be studied, a convenient cage can be made by
combining a large lamp-chimney with a small flower-pot.
"The root-cage.—For the study of insects that infest the roots of
plants, the writer has devised a special form of breeding-cage known
as the root-cage. In its simplest form this cage consists of a frame
holding two plates of glass in a vertical position and only a short
distance apart. The space between the plates of glass is filled with
soil in which seeds are planted or small plants set. The width of the
space between the plates of glass depends on the width of two strips
of wood placed between them, one at each end, and should be only
wide enough to allow the insects under observation to move freely
through the soil. If it is too wide the insects will be able to conceal
themselves. Immediately outside of each glass there is a piece of
blackened zinc which slips into grooves in the ends of the cage, and
which can be easily removed when it is desired to observe the insects
in the soil.
63. "Aquaria.—For the breeding of aquatic insects aquaria are needed. As
the ordinary rectangular aquaria are expensive and are liable to leak
we use glass vessels instead.
"Small aquaria can be made of jelly-tumblers, glass finger-bowls, and
glass fruit-cans, and larger aquaria can be obtained of dealers. A
good substitute for these is what is known as a battery-jar (fig. 168).
There are several sizes of these, which can be obtained of most
dealers in scientific apparatus.
"To prepare an aquarium, place in the jar a layer of sand; plant some
water-plants in this sand, cover the sand with a layer of gravel or
small stones, and then add the required amount of water carefully, so
as not to disturb the plants or to roil the water unduly. The growing
plants will keep the water in good condition for aquatic animal life,
and render changing of the water unnecessary, if the animals in it live
naturally in quiet water. Among the more available plants for use in
aquaria are the following:
"Waterweed, Elodea canadensis.
"Bladderwort, Utricularia (several species).
"Water-starwort, Callitriche (several species).
"Watercress, Nasturtium officinale.
"Stoneworts, Chara and Nitella (several species of each).
"Frog-spittle or water-silk, Spirogyra.
"A small quantity of duckweed, Lemna, placed on the surface of the
water adds to the beauty of an aquarium.
"When it is necessary to add water to an aquarium on account of loss
by evaporation, rain water should be used to prevent an undue
accumulation of the mineral-water held in solution in other water."
64. Fig. 168.—Battery-jar aquarium. (From Jenkins and Kellogg.)
Making collections.—Much is to be learned about animals by
"collecting" them. But the collecting should be done chiefly with the
idea of learning about the animals rather than with the notion of
getting as many specimens as possible. To collect, it is necessary to
find the animals alive; one learns thus their haunts, their local
distribution, and something of their habits, while by continued work
one comes to know how many and what different kinds or species of
each group being collected occur in the region collected over.
Collecting requires the sacrifice of life, however, and this will always
65. be kept well in mind by the humane teacher and pupil. Where one set
of specimens will do, no more should be collected. The author
believes that high-school work in this line should be almost
exclusively limited to the building up of a common school collection.
Let a single set of specimens be brought together by the combined
efforts of all the members of the class, and let it be well housed and
cared for permanently. Each succeeding class will add to it; it may
come in time to be a really representative exhibition of the local
fauna.
The high-school collection should include not only adult specimens of
the various kinds of animals, forming a systematic collection, as it is
called, but also all kinds of specimens which illustrate the structure
and habits of the animals in question and which will constitute a so-
called biological collection. Specimens of the eggs and all immature
stages; dissections preserved in alcohol or formalin showing the
external and internal anatomy; nests, cocoons, and all specimens
showing the work and industries of the various animals; in short, any
specimen of the animal itself in embryonic or postembryonic
condition, or any parts of the animal, or anything illustrating what the
animal does or how it lives, all these should be collected as
assiduously as the adult individuals. Each specimen in the collection
should be labelled with the name of the animal, the date, and locality,
and the name of the collector, with any particular information which
will make it more instructive. If such special data are too voluminous
for a label, they should be written in a general note-book called
"Notes on Collections" (kept in the schoolroom with the collection),
the specimen and corresponding data being given a common number
so that their association may be recognized. In the following
paragraphs are given brief directions for catching, pinning up, and
caring for insects, for making skins of birds and mammals, and for
the alcoholic preservation of other kinds of animals.
Insects.—For catching insects there are needed a net, a killing-bottle,
a few small vials of alcohol, and a few small boxes to carry home live
specimens, cocoons, galls, etc. For preparing and preserving the
66. Fig. 169.—Insect killing-bottle; cyanide
of potassium at bottom, covered with
plaster of Paris. (From Jenkins and
Kellogg.)
insects there are needed insect-
pins, cork- or pith-lined drawers or
boxes, and small wide-mouthed
bottles of alcohol.
The net, about 2 feet deep,
tapering and rounded at its lower
end, is made of cheesecloth or
bobinet (not mosquito-netting,
which is too frail), attached to a
ring, one foot in diameter, of No. 3
galvanized iron wire, which in turn
is fitted into a light wooden or cane
handle about three and a half feet
long.
The killing-bottle (fig. 169) is
prepared by putting a few small lumps (about a teaspoonful) of
cyanide of potassium into the bottom of a wide-mouthed bottle
holding about four ounces, and covering this cyanide with wet plaster
of Paris. When the plaster sets it will hold the cyanide in place, and
allow the fumes given off by its gradual volatilization to fill the bottle.
Insects dropped into it will be killed in from two or three to ten
minutes. Keep a little tissue paper in the bottle to soak up moisture
and to prevent the specimens from rubbing. Also keep the bottle well
corked. Label it "Poison," and do not breathe the fumes (hydrocyanic
gas). Insects may be left in it over night without injury to them.
Butterflies or dragon-flies too large to drop into the killing-bottle may
be killed by dropping a little chloroform or benzine on a piece of
cotton, to be placed in a tight box with them. Larvæ (caterpillars,
grubs, etc.) and pupæ (chrysalids) should be dropped into the vials of
alcohol.
In collecting, visit flowers, sweep the net back and forth over the
small flowers and grasses of meadows and pastures, look under
stones, break up old logs and stumps, poke about decaying matter,
jar and shake small trees and shrubs, and visit ponds and streams.
67. Many insects can be collected in summer at night about electric
lights, or a lamp by an open window.
When the insects are brought home or to the schoolroom they must
be "pinned up." Buy insect-pins, long, slender, small-headed, sharp-
pointed pins, of a dealer in naturalists' supplies (see p. 453). These
pins cost ten cents a hundred. Order Klaeger pins, No. 3, or
Carlsbaeder pins, No. 5. These are the most useful sizes. For larger
pins order Klaeger No. 5 (Carlsbaeder No. 8); for smaller order
Klaeger No. 1 (Carlsbaeder No. 2). Pin each insect straight down
through the thorax (fig. 170) (except beetles, which pin through the
right wing-cover near the middle of the body). On each pin below the
insect place a small label with date and locality of capture. Insects too
small to be pinned may be gummed on to small slips of cardboard,
which should be then pinned up. Keep the insects in drawers or boxes
lined on the bottom with a thin layer of cork, or pith of some kind.
(Corn-pith can be used; also in the West, the pith of the flowering
stalk of the century plant.) The cheapest insect-boxes and very good
ones, too, are cigar-boxes. But unless well looked after they let in tiny
live insects which feed on the dead specimens. For a permanent
collection, therefore, it will be necessary to have made some tight
boxes or drawers. Glass-topped ones are best, so that the specimens
may be examined without opening them. A "moth-ball" (naphthaline)
fastened in one corner of the box will help keep out the marauding
insects.
68. Fig. 170.—Insect properly "pinned up." (From Jenkins and Kellogg.)
Butterflies, dragon-flies, and other larger and beautiful-winged insects
should be "spread," that is, should be allowed to dry with wings
expanded. To do this spreading- or setting-boards (figs. 171 and 172)
are necessary. Such a board consists of two strips of wood fastened a
short distance apart so as to leave between them a groove for the
body of the insect, and upon which the wings are held in position
until the insect is dry. A narrow strip of pith or cork should be
fastened to the lower side of the two strips of wood, closing the
groove below. Into this cork is thrust the pin on which the insect is
mounted. Another strip of wood is fastened to the lower sides of the
cleats to which the two strips are nailed. This serves as a bottom and
protects the points of the pins which project through the piece of
cork. The wings are held down, after having been outspread with the
hinder margins of the fore wings about at right angles to the body, by
strips of paper pinned down over them.
"Soft specimens" such as insect larvæ, myriapods, and spiders should
be preserved in bottles of alcohol (85 per cent). Nests, galls, stems,
69. Fig. 171.—Setting-board with butterflies
properly "spread." (After
Comstock.)
and leaves partly eaten by insects,
and other dry specimens can be
kept in small pasteboard boxes.
For a good and full account of
insect-collecting and preserving,
with directions for making insect-
cases, etc., see Comstock's "Insect
Life," pp. 284-314.
Birds.—In collecting birds,
shooting is chiefly to be relied on.
Use dust-shot (the smallest shot
made) in small loads. For shooting
small birds it is extremely desirable
to have an auxiliary barrel of much
smaller bore than the usual
shotgun which can be fitted into
one of the regular gun-barrels. In
such an auxiliary barrel use 32-
calibre shells loaded with dust-shot
instead of bullets. Plug up the
throat and vent of shot birds with
cotton, and thrust each bird head
downward into a cornucopia of
paper. This will keep the feathers
unsoiled and smooth.
Birds should be skinned soon after
bringing home, after they have
become relaxed, but before evidences of decomposition are manifest.
The tools and materials necessary to make skins are scalpel, strong
sharp-pointed scissors, bone-cutters, forceps, corn-meal, a mixture of
two parts white arsenic and one part powdered alum, cotton, and
metric-system measure. Before skinning, the bird should be
measured. With a metric-system measure carefully take the alar
extent, i.e. spread from tip to tip of outstretched wings; length of
70. wing, i.e. length from wrist-joint to tip; length of bill in straight line
from base (on dorsal aspect) to tip; length of tarsus, and length of
middle toe and claw.
To skin the bird, cut from anus to point of breast-bone through the
skin only. Work skin away on each side to legs; push each leg up, cut
off at knee-joint, skin down to next joint, remove all flesh from bone,
and pull leg back into place; loosen skin at base of tail, cut through
vertebral column at last joint, being careful not to cut through bases
of tail-feathers; work skin forward, turning it inside out, loosening it
carefully all around, without stretching, to wings; cut off wings at
elbow-joint, skin down to next joint and remove flesh from wing-
bones; push skin forward to base of skull, and if skull is not too large
(it is in ducks, woodpeckers, and some other birds), on over it to ears
and eyes; be very careful in loosening the membrane of ears and in
cutting nictitating membrane of eyes; do not cut into eyeball; remove
eyeballs without breaking; cut off base of skull, and scoop out brain;
remove flesh from skull, and "poison" the skin by dusting it
thoroughly with the powdered arsenic and alum mixture. Turn skin
right side out, and clean off fresh blood-stains by soaking them up
with corn-meal; wash off dried blood with water, and dry with corn-
meal. Corn-meal may be used during skinning to soak up blood and
grease.
71. Fig. 172.—Setting-board in cross-section to show construction. (After Comstock.)
There remains to stuff the skin. Fill orbits of eyes with cotton (this
can be advantageously done before skin is reversed); thrust into neck
a moderately compact, elastic, smooth roll of cotton about thickness
of the natural neck; make a loose oval ball of size and general shape
of bird's body and put into body-cavity with anterior end under the
posterior end of neck-roll; pull two edges of abdominal incision
together over the cotton, fasten, if necessary, with a single stitch of
thread, smooth feathers, fold wings in natural position, wrap skin, not
tightly, in thin sheet of cotton (opportunity for delicate handling here)
and put away in a drawer or box to dry. Before putting away tie label
to leg, giving date and locality of capture, sex and measurements of
bird, and name of collector. Before bird is put into permanent
collection it should be labelled with its common and scientific name.
The mounting of birds in lifelike shape and attitude is hard to do
successfully; and a collection of mounted birds demands much more
room and more expensive cabinets than one of skins. For instructions
for the mounting of birds see Davie's "Methods in the Art of
Taxidermy," pp. 39-57; or Hornaday's "Taxidermy and Zoological
Collecting." For a more detailed account of making bird-skins, see
also these books, or Ridgway's "Directions for Collecting Birds."
In collecting birds' nests cut off the branch or branches on which the
nest is placed a few inches above and below the nest, leaving it in its
natural position. Ground-nests should have the section of the sod on
which they are placed taken up and preserved with them. If the inner
lining of the nest consists of feathers or fur put in a "moth-ball"
(naphthaline).
To preserve birds' eggs they should be emptied through a single small
hole on one side by blowing. Prick a hole with a needle and enlarge
with an egg-drill (obtain of dealers in naturalists' supplies, see p.
453.) Blow with a simple bent blowpipe with point smaller than the
hole. After removing contents clean by blowing in a little water, and
blowing it out again. After cleaning, place the egg, hole downward,
on a layer of corn-meal to dry. Label each egg by writing on it near
72. the hole a number. Use a soft pencil for writing. This number should
refer to a record (book) under similar number, or to an "egg-blank,"
containing the following data: name of bird, number of eggs in set,
date and locality, name of collector, and any special information about
the eggs or nest which the collector may think advisable. The eggs
may be kept in drawers or boxes lined with cotton, and divided into
little compartments.
For detailed directions for collecting and preserving birds' eggs and
nests, see Bendire's "Directions for Collecting, Preparing, and
Preserving Birds' Eggs and Nests" or Davie's "Methods in the Art of
Taxidermy," pp. 74-78. [21] Mammals.—Any mammal intended for a
scientific specimen should be measured in the flesh, before skinning,
and as soon after death as practicable, when the muscles are still
flexible. (This is particularly true of larger species, such as foxes,
wildcats, etc.) The measurements are taken in millimetres, a rule or
steel tape being used. (1) Total length: stretch the animal on its back
along the rule or tape and measure from the tip of the nose (head
extended as far as possible) to the tip of the fleshy part of tail (not to
end of hairs). (2) Tail: bend tail at right angles from body backward
and place end of ruler in the angle, holding the tail taut against the
ruler. Measure only to tip of flesh (make this measurement with a pair
of dividers). (3) Hind foot: place sole of foot flat on ruler and
measure from heel to tip of longest toe-nail (in certain small
mammals it is necessary to use dividers for accuracy). The
measurements should be entered on the label, along with such
necessary data as sex, locality, date, and collector's name.
Skin a mammal as soon after death as possible. Lay mammal on back
and with scissors or scalpel open the skin along belly from about
midway between fore and hind legs to vent, taking care not to cut
muscles of abdomen. Skin down on either side of the body by
working the skin from flesh with fingers till hind legs appear. Use
corn-meal to stanch blood or moisture. With left hand grasp a leg and
work the knee from without into the opening just made; cut the bone
at the knee, skin leg to heel and clean meat off the bone (leaving it
attached of course to foot). In animals larger than squirrels skin down
73. to tips of toes. Do the same with other leg. Skin around base of tail
till the skin is free all around so that a grip can be secured on body;
then with thumb and forefinger hold the skin tight at base of tail and
slowly pull out the tail. In small mammals this can be done readily,
but in foxes it is often necessary to split the skin up along the under
side and dissect it off the tail-bones. After the tail is free skin down
the body, using the fingers (except in large mammals) till the fore
legs are reached; treat the fore legs in the same manner as hind legs,
thrusting elbow out of the skin much as a person would do in taking
off a coat; cut bone at elbow; clean fore-arm bone. Skin over neck to
base of ears. With scalpel cut through ears close to skull. With scalpel
dissect off skin over the head (taking care not to injure eyelids) down
to tip of nose, severing its cartilage and hence freeing skin from body.
Sew mouth by passing needle through under lip and then across
through two sides of the upper lip; draw taut and tie thread. Poison
skin thoroughly. Turn skin right side out. Next sever the skull carefully
from body, just where the last neck-vertebra joins the back of the
skull. It is necessary to keep the skull, because characters of bone
and teeth are much used in classification. Remove superfluous meat
from the skull and take out brain with a little spoon made of a piece
of wire with loop at end. Tag the skull with a number corresponding
to that on skin, and hang up to dry. A finished specimen skull is made
by boiling it a short time and picking the meat off with forceps,
further cleaning it with an old tooth-brush, when it is placed in the
sun to bleach. Care must be taken always not to injure bones or
dislodge teeth.
Mammals are stuffed with cotton or tow; the latter is used in species
from a gray squirrel up. Large mammals stuffed with cotton do not
dry readily, and often spoil. Being much thicker-skinned than birds,
mammals require more care in drying and ordinarily require a much
longer period. Soft hay may be substituted for tow; never use
feathers or hair. Roll a longish wad of cotton about the size of body
and insert with forceps, taking care to form the head nearly as in life.
Split the back end of the cotton and stuff each hind leg with the two
branches thus formed. Roll a piece of cotton around end of forceps
74. and stuff fore legs. Place a stout straight piece of wire in the tail,
wrapping it slightly to give the tail the plump appearance of life. (If
the cotton cannot be reeled on to the wire evenly, leave it off
entirely.) Make the wire long enough to extend half way up belly. Sew
up slit in belly. Lay mammal on belly and pin out on a board by legs,
with the fore legs close beside head, and hind legs parallel behind,
soles downward. Be sure the label is tied securely on right hind leg.
For directions for preparing and mounting skeletons of birds,
mammals, and other vertebrates, see the books of Davie and
Hornaday already referred to.
Fishes, batrachians, reptiles, and other animals.—The most
convenient and usual way of preserving the other vertebrates (not
birds or mammals) is to put the whole body into 85 per cent alcohol
or 4 per cent formalin. Batrachians should be kept in alcohol not
exceeding 60 per cent strength. Several incisions should always be
made in the body, at least one of which should penetrate the
abdominal cavity. Anatomical preparations are similarly preserved. By
keeping the specimens in glass jars they may be examined without
removal. Fishes should not be kept in formalin more than a few
months, as they absorb water, swell, and grow fragile.
Of the invertebrates all, except the insects, are preserved in alcohol
or formalin. The shells of molluscs can be preserved dry, of course, in
drawers or boxes divided into small compartments.
83. Bunodes californica, 103.
Buteo, 353.
Butterfly, external structure of, 171, *172;
life of, 175;
monarch, anatomy of larva of, 177;
dead leaf, *429;
mimicked by viceroy, *433.
Butterflies, 205;
setting-board for, *466, 467.
Buzzard, turkey, 352.
Cachalot, 393.
Cage, lamp-chimney and flower-pot breeding, *459;
soap-box breeding, *458.
Cake-urchin, 124.
Calcarea, 91.
Calliphora vomitoria, 202;
section through compound eye of, *185.
Callorhinus alascanus, *399.
Callorhinus ursinus, parasitized, *422.
Cambarus sp., dissection of, 18;
life of, 146.
84. Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.
More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge
connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and
personal growth every day!
ebookbell.com