GOOD-MORNING (1) (1) intro to robotics how it can affect outr lives
- 1. GOOD MORNING BY DANISH KHATTAK
- 2. Team Members 1 Zeerak Rehman 2 Samiya Maheen Qureshi 3 Umer Saad Khan 4 Malik Ahmad Afzal
- 3. I WILL BEGIN WITH MY TOPIC………
- 4. Safety and Risk Understanding safety and risk is crucial for protecting ourselves, our communities, and our environment.
- 5. What is Safety? 1 Avoiding Harm Protecting from danger and injury. 2 Safe Conditions Minimizing risks and hazards. 3 Examples Helmets, fire extinguishers, safety procedures.
- 6. What is Risk? Potential Harm The chance of something bad happening. Probability and Impact Likelihood and severity of an event. Examples Crossing a busy road, chemical plant operations.
- 7. Why is Safety and Risk Important? Protecting Life Preventing injuries and saving lives. Environmental Protection Avoiding pollution and environmental disasters. Economic Benefits Reduced accidents and improved productivity.
- 8. Next Up: Zeerak Rehman
- 9. Project Title: Ethical Considerations in the Use of Robots Subtitle: Exploring the Impact of Robotics on Society from an Ethical Perspective
- 10. Project Overview Title: Project Overview •Introduction to the Topic: Examining the ethical challenges surrounding robots in healthcare, manufacturing, defense, and domestic use. •Key Focus: Job displacement, privacy concerns, safety, autonomy, fairness, and human-robot relationships. •Goal: Propose ethical guidelines for responsible robot development and deployment.
- 11. Ethical Issue 1 - Job Displacement Title: Job Displacement and Economic Impact •Problem: Robots replacing human jobs in manufacturing, retail, and logistics. •Ethical Dilemma: Should the economic benefits of robots justify job losses? •Questions: • How should companies and governments address job displacement? • What responsibility do they have to retrain displaced workers?
- 12. Ethical Issue 2: Privacy Concerns: Title: Privacy and Surveillance Concerns •Problem: Robots collecting personal data through sensors and cameras. •Ethical Dilemma: How can we ensure robots respect users’ privacy? •Questions: • What measures should be in place to prevent unauthorized data collection? • How can we ensure transparent data usage?
- 13. Ethical Issue 3 - Autonomy and Control Title: Autonomy and Control in Robotics •Problem: Increasing autonomy in robots (e.g., military, healthcare). •Ethical Dilemma: To what extent should robots make independent decisions? •Questions: • Who is accountable when a robot causes harm or makes a mistake? • How can we ensure human control over robots in critical situations?
- 14. Ethical Issue 4 - Safety and Accountability Title: Safety and Accountability •Problem: Robots interacting with humans could pose safety risks. •Ethical Dilemma: How can we ensure robots are safe and reliable? •Questions: • What systems should be in place to ensure robot safety in public and private spaces? • Who is responsible for accidents or malfunctions?
- 15. Ethical Issue 5: Human-Robot Relationships Title: Human-Robot Relationships and Dependency •Problem: Unhealthy emotional dependency on robots, particularly in caregiving or companionship roles. •Ethical Dilemma: How can we balance human-robot interactions to avoid over- dependence? •Questions: • What role should robots play in caregiving without replacing human relationships? • How can we ensure robots contribute to human well-being in a positive way?
- 16. Risks at Individual, Societal, and Community Levels 1.Individual Level Risks: .Physical Injury: As robots are integrated into more environments, the risk of accidents increases, especially if safety protocols are not properly followed. o Example: Industrial robots, though efficient, pose physical injury risks if safety measures are not properly implemented. Accidents like workers being struck by robotic arms in manufacturing plants have occurred. o Loss of Privacy: Individuals may lose control over their personal data. The continuous monitoring by robots or smart devices can lead to surveillance concerns. o Example: The use of security robots in public spaces might raise concerns about surveillance and the erosion of individual privacy.
- 17. Societal Level Risks: o Job Loss and Economic Inequality: Widespread automation could lead to job displacement, especially for low-skilled workers. The shift toward automation risks exacerbating income inequality. o Example: The introduction of robots in retail, like automated checkout systems, may reduce the need for cashiers, leading to job loss for many people. o Dependence on Technology: Over-reliance on robots could lead to societal dependency, where human skills and decision-making abilities might erode over time. o Example: The rise of autonomous vehicles might make people less familiar with driving, which could become problematic if the technology fails or if people have to drive in emergency situations.
- 18. 1. Community Level Risks: o Social Disruption: As robots and AI become more pervasive, they could disrupt social structures and communities, especially in regions heavily reliant on certain types of labor. o Example: In areas where autonomous trucks replace long-haul drivers, entire communities could be affected, leading to economic instability and social tension. o Unequal Access: The benefits of robots and AI are not equally distributed. Wealthier communities may benefit from advanced technologies, while poorer areas are left behind. o Example: In healthcare, wealthy communities may have access to cutting-edge robotic surgical tools, while low-income areas struggle with basic medical care.
- 19. Safety Measures at Individual, Societal, and Community Levels 1. Individual Level Safety Measures: o Physical Safety: Robots should be designed with safety features to protect individuals from harm. For example, collaborative robots (cobots) used in factories are programmed to stop moving if they come into contact with a human. o Privacy Protection: Personal data collected by robots, such as through smart home devices, should be encrypted and used only for the intended purpose. o Example: In healthcare, robots like surgical assistants are used to perform delicate operations, and these robots come with built-in safety features, such as emergency stop functions to prevent accidents.
- 20. 1. Societal Level Safety Measures: o Regulations and Standards: Governments and regulatory bodies should create and enforce laws that govern the safe use of robots. This includes standards for data protection, safety protocols, and ethical guidelines for AI deployment. o Example: The European Union has proposed regulations on AI to ensure that AI systems used in critical sectors, like healthcare and transport, are transparent, accountable, and safe. 1. Community Level Safety Measures: o Public Awareness and Education: Communities must be educated about the capabilities and limitations of robots to ensure proper use and prevent misuse. o Example: In urban settings, self-driving delivery robots are being tested. Public safety can be ensured through community awareness campaigns and the establishment of clear rules about where these robots can travel. o Example of Safety Features: In Japan, robots are being used to care for the elderly. These robots are designed with sensors to detect obstacles and ensure safe movement within nursing homes, preventing injury to residents.
- 21. Conclusion: The integration of robots into our daily lives and across industries brings numerous benefits, including enhanced efficiency, safety, and innovation. However, these benefits come with important ethical considerations and risks at individual, societal, and community levels. It is crucial that robots be designed with built-in safety measures, and that governments and organizations regulate their use to minimize risks and promote fair access. Through careful ethical scrutiny, we can ensure that robots contribute positively to society, enhancing human capabilities while safeguarding against potential harms.
- 22. Umer Saad Khan: 3 Miles Land Case Next Presentation
- 23. Bhopal Gas Tragedy: A Case Study
- 24. The Incident 1 December 2, 1984 The incident occurred on the evening of December 2nd, 1984, in Bhopal, India. 2 Methyl Isocyanate Release A massive leak of toxic Methyl Isocyanate (MIC) gas from the Union Carbide plant resulted in a catastrophic release into the atmosphere. Meth 3 Immediate and Long-Term Consequences The immediate impact of the gas release was devastating, causing thousands of deaths, and long-term health and environmental damage.
- 25. Union Carbide Overview Established in 1969 Union Carbide India Limited was established in 1969 as a joint venture. Pesticide Production The plant in Bhopal produced the pesticide "Sevin," which was marketed globally. Ownership Structure The ownership was divided between 51% owned by Union Carbide (USA) and 49% by Indian investors, including government participation.
- 26. Production of MIC 1 Cost-Cutting Measures The Bhopal plant faced financial losses, leading to cost-cutting measures. 2 Safety Concerns Ignored Production continued despite numerous safety concerns raised by workers. 3 Unqualified Staff The company employed unqualified staff to minimize expenses, further compromising safety.
- 27. Technical Issues Overfilled Tanks The MIC storage tank was overfilled beyond its safe capacity. Faulty Gauges Pressure and capacity gauges were non-functional, hindering monitoring. Disabled Alarms Emergency alarms were intentionally turned off to avoid disruptions. Evacuation Plan Missing A comprehensive evacuation plan was absent, leaving workers and residents unprepared. Scrubber Systems Failure The scrubber systems, designed to neutralize MIC leaks, were inoperative.
- 28. Moral Issues Disregard for Human Life The company prioritized profits over the safety of workers and the community. Negligence in Safety Protocols Serious safety protocols were ignored or poorly implemented. Exploitation of Vulnerable Populations The plant operated in a densely populated area, disproportionately impacting vulnerable populations. Failure to Warn There was a lack of timely and effective communication regarding potential hazards. Injustice in the Aftermath Victims faced significant challenges in seeking justice and compensation.
- 29. Who is Responsible? Union Carbide (USA) The parent company failed to implement adequate safety measures and prioritize profits over lives. Union Carbide (India) Local management lacked proper training, and workers were poorly supervised. Government of India The government was criticized for ineffective enforcement of safety regulations and slow response to warnings.
- 30. ON THE BEHALF OF MY TEAM I WANT TO TAHNK YOU ALL FOR GIVING US YOUR PRECIOUS TIME