Greedy-Algorithms with Applications.pptx
Download as PPTX, PDF0 likes29 views
Greedy algorithms make locally optimal choices at each stage in order to find a global optimum, often used for optimization problems due to their simplicity and efficiency. They can lead to quick solutions, but may not guarantee optimal outcomes and can get stuck in local optima. The document discusses the characteristics, advantages, and disadvantages of greedy algorithms, along with examples like the coin change problem, knapsack problem, and Kruskal's algorithm.
Greedy-Algorithms with Applications.pptx
- 1. Greedy Algorithms: An Introduction Greedy algorithms are a powerful class of algorithms that make locally optimal choices at each stage with the goal of finding a global optimum. They are simple yet effective, and are widely used in solving various optimization problems. by Riannel Tecson
- 2. What are Greedy Algorithms? 1 Stepwise Approach Greedy algorithms make the choice that seems best at each stage, without considering the long-term consequences. 2 Global Optimality The goal is to find a global optimal solution, even though the algorithm may not explore all possible options. 3 Efficiency Greedy algorithms are often efficient and easy to implement, making them a popular choice for many problems.
- 3. Characteristics of Greedy Algorithms Simplicity Greedy algorithms are straightforward and easy to understand, making them a popular choice for many problems. Locally Optimal At each step, the algorithm makes the choice that seems best at the moment, without considering the long-term consequences. Efficiency Greedy algorithms are often efficient and can be implemented in a timely manner, making them useful for real- world applications.
- 4. Advantages and Disadvantages Advantages Greedy algorithms are simple, efficient, and often produce good results, making them a popular choice for many problems. Disadvantages Greedy algorithms may not always find the global optimal solution, and can be prone to getting stuck in local optima.
- 5. Coin Change Problem 1 Step 1 Define the available coin denominations, such as ₱1, ₱5, ₱10, and ₱20. 2 Step 2 Repeatedly choose the largest coin denomination that is less than or equal to the remaining amount. 3 Step 3 Continue this process until the entire amount has been covered, using the minimum number of coins.
- 6. Sample Problem 1. Determine the minimum number of coins needed to make 47 units of currency using denominations of ₱1, ₱5, ₱10, and ₱20.
- 7. Sample Problem 1. Determine the minimum number of coins needed to make 47 units of currency using denominations of ₱1, ₱5, ₱10, and ₱20. Solution: Steps: ₱20: 2 coins (40 used, 7 remaining) ₱5: 1 coin (5 used, 2 remaining) ₱1: 2 coins (2 used, 0 remaining) Answer: 5 coins (2 of ₱20, 1 of ₱5, 2 of ₱1).
- 8. Sample Problem 2. Find the minimum number of coins required to make ₱33.
- 9. Sample Problem 2. Find the minimum number of coins required to make ₱33. •Solution: • Steps: ₱20: 1 coin (20 used, 13 remaining) ₱10: 1 coin (10 used, 3 remaining) ₱1: 3 coins (3 used, 0 remaining) • Answer: 5 coins (1 of ₱20, 1 of ₱10, 3 of ₱ 1).
- 10. Optimal solution • In the coin change problem, an optimal solution means finding the minimum number of coins needed to make a specified amount, given a set of denominations. • This solution may involve a combination of coins that doesn’t always align with the choices a greedy algorithm would make, particularly when the greedy approach does not yield the least number of coins. To define it more precisely: • Optimal Solution: The smallest possible number of coins required to make up the target amount.
- 11. Optimal solution For example, • if you want to make 30 units with denominations of 1, 5, 10, and 20, the greedy algorithm would choose a 20 and a 10, totaling 2 coins. • However, an alternative configuration of three 10 coins is also possible. • Thus, when considering constraints or minimizing specific denominations, an optimal solution would consider all combinations to ensure the absolute minimum coin count or a setup that meets all constraints.
- 12. Sample Problem 3. Given denominations of coins as 1, 3, and 4, find the minimum number of coins needed to make 6 units. How many coins needed to give 6 units using Greedy algorithm?
- 13. Sample Problem 3. Given denominations of coins as 1, 3, and 4, find the minimum number of coins needed to make 6 units. How many coins needed to give 6 units using Greedy algorithm? Solution Using Greedy Algorithm: The greedy algorithm selects the largest denomination that doesn’t exceed the remaining amount at each step. 1. Start with the largest denomination, 4: 1.4: 1 coin (4 used, 2 remaining) 2. Next, use the largest coin that is less than or equal to 2: 1.1: 2 coins (1 + 1 used, 0 remaining) •Total Coins (Greedy Solution): 3 coins (1 of 4, 2 of 1).
- 14. Sample Problem 3. Given denominations of coins as 1, 3, and 4, find the minimum number of coins needed to make 6 units. How many coins needed to give 6 units using Greedy algorithm? Optimal Solution: By exploring all possible combinations, we can achieve the target amount using 2 coins: 1.Use two coins of 3 (3 + 3 = 6). • Total Coins (Optimal Solution): 2 coins (2 of 3).
- 15. Knapsack Problem Define Items Assign a value and weight to each item that can be placed in the knapsack. Maximize Value Choose the items that maximize the total value while staying within the weight limit of the knapsack. Greedy Approach A greedy algorithm would select the items with the highest value-to-weight ratio, until the knapsack is full.
- 16. Problem 1: 0/1 Knapsack Problem where fractions of items are not allowed. The goal is to maximize the total value of items in the knapsack. • You cannot take fractions of items; each item must be taken in its entirety (0/1 knapsack). You have a knapsack that can hold up to 50 kg. You are given the following items, each with a weight and a value: Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) A 10 60 B 20 100 C 30 120 D 40 150
- 17. Solution Using Greedy Algorithm: A common greedy approach for the knapsack problem is to select items based on the highest value-to-weight ratio until the knapsack reaches capacity. 1.Calculate Value-to-Weight Ratios for each item: 1.Item A: 60/10 = 6 2.Item B: 100/20 = 5 3.Item C: 120/30 = 4 4.Item D: 150/40 = 3.75 2.Sort Items by Value-to-Weight Ratio (from highest to lowest): Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) Value-to-Weight Ratio A 10 60 6 B 20 100 5 C 30 120 4 D 40 150 3.75
- 18. 3. Select Items Based on Greedy Algorithm: Step 1: Add Item A completely (10 kg, value ₱60). 1.Remaining Capacity: 50−10 = 40 kg 2.Total Value: ₱60 Step 2: Add Item B completely (20 kg, value ₱100). 3.Remaining Capacity: 40−20 = 20 kg 4.Total Value: ₱60 + ₱100 = ₱160 Step 3: Add Item C completely (30 kg, value ₱120). 5.Item C cannot be added since only 20 kg remain. Step 4: Stop, as no other item can fit in the remaining capacity. •Total Value (Greedy Solution): ₱160 (Items A and B). Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) Value-to-Weight Ratio A 10 60 6 B 20 100 5 C 30 120 4 D 40 150 3.75 Is it OPTIMAL solution?
- 19. Optimal Solution: By exploring all combinations, we find a better solution by selecting Item D and Item A: 1. Add Item D completely (40 kg, value ₱150). 2. Add Item A completely (10 kg, value ₱60). Total Weight: 40 + 10= 50 kg Total Value (Optimal Solution): ₱150 + ₱60= ₱210 Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) Value-to-Weight Ratio A 10 60 6 B 20 100 5 C 30 120 4 D 40 150 3.75
- 20. Problem 2: The goal is to maximize the total value of items in the knapsack. • You can take fractions of items if needed (i.e., this is the fractional knapsack problem). You have a knapsack that can hold up to 50 kg. You are given the following items with their weights and values: Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) A 10 60 B 20 100 C 30 120
- 21. Solution Using Greedy Algorithm: In the fractional knapsack problem, the greedy approach selects items based on the highest value-to-weight ratio. 1.Calculate Value-to-Weight Ratios for each item: 1. Item A: 60/10 = 6 2. Item B: 100/20 = 5 3. Item C: 120/30 = 4 2.Sort Items by Value-to-Weight Ratio (from highest to lowest): 1.Item A (6) 2.Item B (5) 3.Item C (4)
- 22. Solution Using Greedy Algorithm: 3. Fill the Knapsack by adding items in order of the highest value-to-weight ratio until the capacity is reached: 1.Step 1: Add Item A completely (10 kg, value ₱60). 1.Remaining Capacity: 50−10 = 40 kg 2.Total Value: ₱60 2.Step 2: Add Item B completely (20 kg, value ₱100). 1.Remaining Capacity: 40−20 = 20 kg 2.Total Value: ₱60 + ₱100 = ₱160 3.Step 3: Add Item C partially, taking only 20 kg out of 30 kg. 1.Value from Item C: (120/30) × 20 = 80 2.Total Value: ₱160 + ₱80 = ₱240 Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) A 10 60 B 20 100 C 30 120
- 23. Solution Using Greedy Algorithm: Final Answer: Maximum Value in Knapsack: ₱240 Items Selected: Item A: Entire (10 kg, value ₱60) Item B: Entire (20 kg, value ₱100) Item C: Partial (20 kg, value ₱80) Using the greedy approach based on the highest value-to-weight ratio, we achieve a maximum total value of ₱240 within the 50 kg weight limit of the knapsack. Item Weight (Kg) Value (₱) A 10 60 B 20 100 C 30 120
- 24. Kruskal's Algorithm Sort Edges Sort the edges of the graph in ascending order by weight. Union-Find Use a Union-Find data structure to keep track of connected components. Add Edges Iteratively add the lightest edge that doesn't create a cycle, until all vertices are connected.
- 25. Conclusion and Recap 1 Simplicity Greedy algorithms are straightforward and easy to implement, making them a popular choice for many problems. 2 Efficiency Greedy algorithms are often efficient and can produce good results in a timely manner. 3 Limitations Greedy algorithms may not always find the global optimal solution, and can be prone to getting stuck in local optima.