SlideShare a Scribd company logo
LEAH  CURRY,  SALMAN  JAVED,  KAVINDRA  SINGH
CHEMICAL  ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT
THE  CITY  COLLEGE  OF  NEW  YORK
SENIOR  DESIGN  CLASS
Overview	
  
1.  Introduc1on	
  
2.  Proposed	
  Project	
  
3.  Aspen	
  Simula1on	
  
a)  Aspen	
  PFD	
  
b)  Equipment	
  Selec1on	
  and	
  Cost	
  
4.  Economic	
  Modelling	
  
5.  Sensi1vity	
  Analysis	
  
6.  Conclusions	
  and	
  Recommenda1ons	
  
7.  Ques1ons	
  
Introduc1on	
  
	
   Hospitals	
  Produce	
  5.9	
  million	
  tons	
  of	
  waste	
  annually,	
  15%	
  of	
  which	
  is	
  
plas1c	
  
	
   A	
  lot	
  of	
  the	
  waste	
  is	
  considered	
  bio-­‐hazardous,	
  therefore,	
  it	
  is	
  incinerated	
  
	
   Syringes,	
  gloves	
  among	
  the	
  waste	
  considered	
  a	
  bio-­‐hazard—good	
  
candidates	
  for	
  pyrolysis	
  
Proposed	
  Project	
  
Base  Case
§ 10	
  Tons	
  of	
  Plas1c	
  consis1ng	
  of	
  37%	
  HDPE,	
  25%	
  
LDPE,	
  33%	
  PP	
  and	
  5%	
  PS	
  
§ Heat	
  at	
  500	
  °C	
  in	
  an	
  inert	
  environment	
  (pyrolyze)	
  
§ Separate	
  the	
  gases	
  from	
  liquid	
  and	
  carbon	
  black.	
  	
  
§ Expected	
  produc1on	
  200	
  gallons	
  of	
  diesel/ton	
  of	
  
plas1c	
  
GroupD_PresentationFinal_CurryJavedSingh
Mass	
  Balance	
  
Input	
   Output	
  
Plas1c	
   Weight	
  frac1on	
   Product	
   Weight	
  frac1on	
  
HDPE	
   0.37	
   Light	
  gases	
   0.30	
  
LDPE	
   0.25	
   Diesel	
   0.70	
  
PP	
   0.33	
   Carbon	
  black	
   >0.01	
  
PS	
   0.05	
   	
  	
   	
  	
  
Aspen	
  Simula1on	
  
GroupD_PresentationFinal_CurryJavedSingh
GroupD_PresentationFinal_CurryJavedSingh
Equipment	
  
Selec1on	
  
and	
  Cost	
  
Equipment	
   Cost	
  (2014)	
  
Kiln	
   $428,5251	
  
Pump(s)	
   $12,0302	
  
Cyclone	
  Separator	
   $7,5263	
  
Cooling	
  Tower	
   $4,0004	
  
Storage	
  Tank	
   $31,1652	
  
Heat	
  exchanger(s)	
   $6,5452	
  
Extruder	
   $35,5055	
  
Condenser	
   $4,6752	
  
Total	
   $529,970	
  
All	
  prices	
  are	
  
normalized	
  to	
  April	
  
2014	
  using	
  CEPCI	
  
	
  
1Perry’s	
  Handbook	
  
2Peter	
  and	
  Timmerhaus	
  
3Honeyville	
  Metals	
  Inc.	
  	
  
4Cooling	
  Tower	
  Systems	
  Inc.	
  	
  
5Plas1cs	
  Technology	
  
Magazine,	
  Vol.38,	
  1988	
  
	
  
Economic  Modeling
Approxima1on	
  method:	
  
	
  Lang	
  Cost	
  Factor	
  Es1ma1on	
  
This	
  fluid	
  processing	
  plant	
  	
  
therefore	
  
	
  Lang	
  Cost	
  Factor:	
  4.74	
  
	
  
Total	
  Capital	
  Cost	
  	
  
$529,970	
  ×	
  4.74	
  =	
  $2,512,000	
  
Economic	
  Modeling	
  
Cost	
  Analysis	
  
Expected	
  Plant	
  life	
   30	
  years	
  	
  
Wholesale	
  Diesel	
  prices	
   $2.25	
  USD/gallon	
  
Produc1on	
   730,000	
  gallons/annum	
  
Produc=on	
  cost	
  (per	
  annum)	
  
Projected	
  Revenue	
   $1,642,500.00	
  
Es1mated	
  Total	
  Capital	
  Cost	
  (2014)	
   $2,512,058.00	
  
Opera1on	
  and	
  Maintenance	
   $593,971.00	
  
Deprecia1on	
   $17,666.00	
  
Taxes	
   $423,684.00	
  
Profit	
   $624,844.00	
  
ROI	
   25%	
  
Time	
  to	
  recover	
  investment	
   4	
  years	
  
Sensi1vity	
  
Analysis	
  
Base  Case
§ 10	
  Tons	
  of	
  Plas1c	
  consis1ng	
  of	
  37%	
  HDPE,	
  25%	
  
LDPE,	
  33%	
  PP	
  and	
  5%	
  PS	
  
§ Analog	
  for	
  Hospital	
  plas1cs;	
  does	
  not	
  contain	
  
biohazard	
  agent	
  
§ Plas1c	
  waste	
  cost:	
  $30/ton	
  
§ Expected	
  produc1on	
  200	
  gallons	
  of	
  diesel/ton	
  of	
  
plas1c	
  
Effect	
  of	
  Market	
  price	
  of	
  
Diesel	
  on	
  ROI	
  
Base	
  Case	
  
18%	
  ROI	
  
Effect	
  of	
  Produc1on	
  Rate,	
  for	
  
four	
  diesel	
  price,	
  on	
  ROI	
  
Base	
  Case	
  
Conclusions	
  and	
  
Recommenda1ons	
  
§ It	
  is	
  feasible	
  to	
  convert	
  Hospital	
  plas1c	
  waste	
  into	
  diesel	
  	
  
§ retains	
  a	
  high	
  ROI	
  at	
  current	
  and	
  expected	
  future	
  market	
  prices	
  	
  
§ Profitable	
  enough	
  to	
  suggest	
  research	
  into	
  using	
  actual	
  	
  
bio-­‐hazardous	
  hospital	
  waste	
  as	
  feedstock.	
  
§ Research	
  	
  
Ø Precau1ons	
  and	
  OSHA	
  Regula1ons/Cer1fica1ons	
  	
  
Ø And	
  the	
  associated	
  cost.	
  
§ 	
  Possibility	
  of	
  being	
  paid	
  to	
  process	
  the	
  bio-­‐hazardous	
  feedstock	
  as	
  to	
  	
  	
  
opposed	
  to	
  paying	
  it	
  
QuesHons
Kestons!?	
  

More Related Content

PPTX
Las redes sociales en educación
PPTX
PPSX
Crete by Josta
PPSX
Japan! Part 2 by Ines
PPSX
Traditional Oriental Medicine by Helga
PDF
강남오피.범계오피≒다솜넷≒일산오피걸.선릉역오피방
PPTX
Restaurar fotografías antiguas
PDF
Amaze showcase review
Las redes sociales en educación
Crete by Josta
Japan! Part 2 by Ines
Traditional Oriental Medicine by Helga
강남오피.범계오피≒다솜넷≒일산오피걸.선릉역오피방
Restaurar fotografías antiguas
Amaze showcase review

Viewers also liked (7)

DOCX
Slideshare Leandro López
PPTX
Las redes sociales en educación
PDF
DeltaScientific.com
PDF
Analysis of multi storey building frames subjected to gravity and seismic loa...
DOC
Yiftah Neta C.V.2015 heb
PPSX
Rome, the Eternal City, by tania
PDF
SALES_COACHING_BROCHURE_final
Slideshare Leandro López
Las redes sociales en educación
DeltaScientific.com
Analysis of multi storey building frames subjected to gravity and seismic loa...
Yiftah Neta C.V.2015 heb
Rome, the Eternal City, by tania
SALES_COACHING_BROCHURE_final
Ad

GroupD_PresentationFinal_CurryJavedSingh

  • 1. LEAH  CURRY,  SALMAN  JAVED,  KAVINDRA  SINGH CHEMICAL  ENGINEERING  DEPARTMENT THE  CITY  COLLEGE  OF  NEW  YORK SENIOR  DESIGN  CLASS
  • 2. Overview   1.  Introduc1on   2.  Proposed  Project   3.  Aspen  Simula1on   a)  Aspen  PFD   b)  Equipment  Selec1on  and  Cost   4.  Economic  Modelling   5.  Sensi1vity  Analysis   6.  Conclusions  and  Recommenda1ons   7.  Ques1ons  
  • 3. Introduc1on     Hospitals  Produce  5.9  million  tons  of  waste  annually,  15%  of  which  is   plas1c     A  lot  of  the  waste  is  considered  bio-­‐hazardous,  therefore,  it  is  incinerated     Syringes,  gloves  among  the  waste  considered  a  bio-­‐hazard—good   candidates  for  pyrolysis  
  • 5. Base  Case § 10  Tons  of  Plas1c  consis1ng  of  37%  HDPE,  25%   LDPE,  33%  PP  and  5%  PS   § Heat  at  500  °C  in  an  inert  environment  (pyrolyze)   § Separate  the  gases  from  liquid  and  carbon  black.     § Expected  produc1on  200  gallons  of  diesel/ton  of   plas1c  
  • 7. Mass  Balance   Input   Output   Plas1c   Weight  frac1on   Product   Weight  frac1on   HDPE   0.37   Light  gases   0.30   LDPE   0.25   Diesel   0.70   PP   0.33   Carbon  black   >0.01   PS   0.05          
  • 11. Equipment   Selec1on   and  Cost   Equipment   Cost  (2014)   Kiln   $428,5251   Pump(s)   $12,0302   Cyclone  Separator   $7,5263   Cooling  Tower   $4,0004   Storage  Tank   $31,1652   Heat  exchanger(s)   $6,5452   Extruder   $35,5055   Condenser   $4,6752   Total   $529,970   All  prices  are   normalized  to  April   2014  using  CEPCI     1Perry’s  Handbook   2Peter  and  Timmerhaus   3Honeyville  Metals  Inc.     4Cooling  Tower  Systems  Inc.     5Plas1cs  Technology   Magazine,  Vol.38,  1988    
  • 12. Economic  Modeling Approxima1on  method:    Lang  Cost  Factor  Es1ma1on   This  fluid  processing  plant     therefore    Lang  Cost  Factor:  4.74     Total  Capital  Cost     $529,970  ×  4.74  =  $2,512,000  
  • 13. Economic  Modeling   Cost  Analysis   Expected  Plant  life   30  years     Wholesale  Diesel  prices   $2.25  USD/gallon   Produc1on   730,000  gallons/annum   Produc=on  cost  (per  annum)   Projected  Revenue   $1,642,500.00   Es1mated  Total  Capital  Cost  (2014)   $2,512,058.00   Opera1on  and  Maintenance   $593,971.00   Deprecia1on   $17,666.00   Taxes   $423,684.00   Profit   $624,844.00   ROI   25%   Time  to  recover  investment   4  years  
  • 15. Base  Case § 10  Tons  of  Plas1c  consis1ng  of  37%  HDPE,  25%   LDPE,  33%  PP  and  5%  PS   § Analog  for  Hospital  plas1cs;  does  not  contain   biohazard  agent   § Plas1c  waste  cost:  $30/ton   § Expected  produc1on  200  gallons  of  diesel/ton  of   plas1c  
  • 16. Effect  of  Market  price  of   Diesel  on  ROI   Base  Case   18%  ROI  
  • 17. Effect  of  Produc1on  Rate,  for   four  diesel  price,  on  ROI   Base  Case  
  • 18. Conclusions  and   Recommenda1ons   § It  is  feasible  to  convert  Hospital  plas1c  waste  into  diesel     § retains  a  high  ROI  at  current  and  expected  future  market  prices     § Profitable  enough  to  suggest  research  into  using  actual     bio-­‐hazardous  hospital  waste  as  feedstock.   § Research     Ø Precau1ons  and  OSHA  Regula1ons/Cer1fica1ons     Ø And  the  associated  cost.   §   Possibility  of  being  paid  to  process  the  bio-­‐hazardous  feedstock  as  to       opposed  to  paying  it