SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Dependent Types For Cryptography
Implementations
Paulo Silva

Manuel Barbosa

HASLab, Departamento de Informática
Universidade do Minho
Portugal

June 14, 2011
Motivation

Cryptographic software demands high-quality
implementations
The CAO language was developed close to cryptographic
standards making the implementation easier and more
reliable
This language is strongly typed with explicit type sizes
Improves safety but makes it less general and usable
Proposed solution: dependent types ⇒ CALF language
CAO Language
Small and simple domain specific language with imperative
flavour
Geared toward the automatic production of highly efficient
target code subject to security-aware optimizations
Type system supports cryptography types such as bit
strings, matrices and field extensions
CAO has a complete formalization of its:
Syntax
Semantics
Type system

We have proved that CAO type system is sound, i.e.,
“well-typed programs do not go wrong”
A fully functional CAO interpreter is also available
CAO Example
AES fragment

typedef GF2 := mod[ 2 ];
typedef GF2N :=
mod[ GF2<X> / X**8 + X**4 + X**3 + X + 1 ];
typedef S
:= matrix[4,4] of GF2N;
def mix : matrix[4,4] of GF2N
{[X], [X+1],[1], [1],
[1], [X], [X+1],[1],
[1], [1], [X], [X+1],
[X+1],[1], [1], [X]};

:=

def MixColumns( s : S ) : S {
def r : S;
seq i := 0 to 3 {
r[0..3,i] := mix * s[0..3,i]; }
return r; }
Limitations of CAO

In CAO all type sizes have to be statically determined
In the previous example, the MixColumns function only
works with 4 × 4 matrices
We would like to allow parametrisation of these sizes. For
instance:
typedef S<(n : int)> := matrix[n,n] of GF2N;
def MixColumns<(n : int)>( s : S<(n)> ) : S<(n)> {
def r : S<(n)>;
seq i := 0 to n-1 {
r[0..n,i] := mix * s[0..n,i]; }
return r; }
Dependent types
A dependent type depends on a value belonging to the
realm of program expressions
Can be seen as families of types indexed by values
In polymorphism, the type depends on another type
parameter, e.g.,
∀ α ∈ types . Vector of α
leading to vectors of integers, vectors of booleans, etc.
Using dependent types, the type depends on a value, e.g.,
Π n : Int . Vector[n]
leading to vectors of length 5, vectors of length 13, etc.
Dependent types
Dependent types allow for specification of program
properties in types, reducing verification of correctness to
type checking
Implementation and specification are kept synchronized
However, type checking of programs using full-fledge
dependent types is not decidable and cannot be done
automatically
To overcome this problem, is is necessary to limit their
expressive power reducing the amount of verifiable
properties
Most existing work is theoretical or in the context of
functional languages
CALF Language

CALF is a higher-level extension of the CAO language,
additionally providing:
Dependent types
Higher-order polymorphic operators (map, fold, and
zip-with)
User-defined parametric data types
Explicit constant definitions
Module system (allowing module instantiation)
CALF Language

The CALF compiler translates CALF source code to CAO
CALF programs are like templates which can be
instantiated with concrete values, leading to multiple CAO
programs
Dependent types allow for verifying some important
properties, without requiring code annotations or deductive
tools, directly in the generic CALF code
For instance, this allows for detecting many out-of-bounds
accesses in vectors, matrices or bit strings
The translation guarantees the safety properties
Dependent types in CALF
CALF has three different kinds of variable-like identifiers:
Language variables
Constants
Index variables

All variable-like identifiers have to be explicitly declared
with their respective type (type inference may be
considered in the future)
Index variables allow the introduction of dependent types
These are variables which can be used, not only in type
declarations, but also in program expressions
In the scope of their declaration, they are treated as
constants
They can be instantiated with any value of their domain
type
Type Expression Evaluation and Type Equality

The implementation of dependent types poses two key
questions:
How to deal with type expressions which are not known at
compile time?
How to define equality, since we cannot rely on syntactic
equality any more?

CALF evaluation mechanism deals with type expressions
that either evaluate to a value or to an expression
depending solely on index variables
Type equality is defined in evaluated type expressions,
possibly generating additional constraints
Type Equality Decision

Two approaches are used to solve generated constraints to
decide equality:
Syntactic manipulation of the constraint expressions
A Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solver

In our approach, two index variables are equal if and only if
they have the same symbolic value
Some additional restrictions (not discussed here) are
imposed in order to guarantee a less complex
implementation while maintaining the expressive power
In practice, we often need unification and substitution
instead of equality
Safety conditions

Sometimes the constraints cannot be verified although the
program is correct
Given a set of constraints, we have three possible results:
The constraints are satisfied — The code is safe
The exists one value for which the constraints are not
satisfied — The code is not safe
It is not possible to decide if the constraints are satisfied —
Unknown case

In the last case, the result is set by the user: succeed,
issue a warning or fail
Translation from CALF to CAO

The translation requires two files:
CALF source file Definition of data types, constants and
function
Specification file Concrete instantiations for the global
index variables
When modules are used, the import declarations have to
be checked and processed accordingly
Translation from CALF to CAO

The process occurs in three phases:
1
2

3

The CALF source file is type checked
The specification file is type checked against the
information collected during the previous phase. A list of
substitutions is returned with the required instantiations.
This list of substitutions is used to generate the output CAO
source. This requires collecting all dependencies between
functions and types

Several instances of the same function or data type may
be generated
CALF Example
RSA fragment

typedef RSAPub<(m : int)>
:=
struct [ def encExp : int; ];
typedef RSAPrivShort<(m : int)> :=
struct [ def decExp : int; ];
def RSA<(n : int)>(k : RSAPub<(n)>, m : int ) : int {
def c : mod[n];
c := (mod[n]) m; c := c ** k.encExp;
return (int) c;
}
def RSAInvShort<(n : int)>
(k : RSAPrivShort<(n)>, c : int) : int {
def m : mod[n];
m := (mod[n]) c;
return (int) m;
}

m := m ** k.decExp;
CALF Example
RSA fragment

def const pq : int;
def const d : int;
def const e : int;
def x : int;
def y : int;
def myPub : RSAPub<(pq)>;
def myPriv : RSAPrivShort<(pq)>;
def Calc() : void {
myPub.encExp := e;
y := RSA<(pq)>(myPub,x);
}
CALF Example
Specification file

def const pq : int := 35;
def const d : int := 11;
def const e : int := 11;
CALF Example
Generated CAO code

typedef RSAPub_35 := struct[def encExp_35 : int;];
def RSA_35(k : RSAPub_35, m : int) : int {
def c : mod[35];
c := (mod[35]) m;
c := c ** k.encExp_35;
return (int) c;
}
def myPub : RSAPub_35;
def x : int;
def y : int;
def Calc() : void {
myPub.encExp_35 := 11;
y := RSA_35(myPub, x);
}
The Overall Picture
Ongoing Work

Introducing explicit constraints in index variables (very
important for practical usage)
Improving the generation and solving of constraints in
iterative statements
Improving the module system (object oriented?)
Publication of results

More Related Content

PPTX
Type checking in compiler design
PDF
PPTX
PDF
9 subprograms
PPTX
Type checking compiler construction Chapter #6
PDF
08 subprograms
PPTX
9 subprograms
PPTX
9. control statement
Type checking in compiler design
9 subprograms
Type checking compiler construction Chapter #6
08 subprograms
9 subprograms
9. control statement

What's hot (20)

PPSX
DISE - Programming Concepts
PPT
Unit 2 Principles of Programming Languages
PDF
Subprogram
PPT
Unit 3 principles of programming language
PPTX
OOP Poster Presentation
PPTX
Structure of the compiler
PPTX
FPL -Part 2 ( Sem - I 2013)
PPTX
Procedural programming
PDF
Mit gnu scheme reference manual
PPTX
Unit1 principle of programming language
PPT
Analysis of the source program
PDF
Different phases of a compiler
PPT
Introduction to Procedural Programming in C++
PDF
PPTX
phases of compiler-analysis phase
PPT
Programming In C++
PPT
Compiler1
PDF
Problem solving methodology
PPTX
1 compiler outline
ODP
CProgrammingTutorial
DISE - Programming Concepts
Unit 2 Principles of Programming Languages
Subprogram
Unit 3 principles of programming language
OOP Poster Presentation
Structure of the compiler
FPL -Part 2 ( Sem - I 2013)
Procedural programming
Mit gnu scheme reference manual
Unit1 principle of programming language
Analysis of the source program
Different phases of a compiler
Introduction to Procedural Programming in C++
phases of compiler-analysis phase
Programming In C++
Compiler1
Problem solving methodology
1 compiler outline
CProgrammingTutorial
Ad

Similar to Dependent Types for Cryptography Implementations (20)

PDF
PDF
Parameter Validation for Software Reliability
PPT
Chapter 5( programming) answer
PPTX
PPTX
Introduction to Compilers
DOCX
Training 8051Report
PPTX
Switch case and looping statement
PPT
Introduction to C Programming - I
PPTX
Compiler Design Unit1 PPT Phases of Compiler.pptx
PPTX
Prgramming paradigms
PPTX
c & c++ logic building concepts practice.pptx
PPTX
X++ 1.pptx
PDF
Introduction to ‘C’ Language
PDF
Asp.net main
PPTX
Language design and translation issues
PDF
Pc module1
PPTX
Unit 1
PPTX
Principles of Compiler Design - Introduction
DOCX
Unit 1 question and answer
Parameter Validation for Software Reliability
Chapter 5( programming) answer
Introduction to Compilers
Training 8051Report
Switch case and looping statement
Introduction to C Programming - I
Compiler Design Unit1 PPT Phases of Compiler.pptx
Prgramming paradigms
c & c++ logic building concepts practice.pptx
X++ 1.pptx
Introduction to ‘C’ Language
Asp.net main
Language design and translation issues
Pc module1
Unit 1
Principles of Compiler Design - Introduction
Unit 1 question and answer
Ad

More from Paulo Silva (6)

PDF
Compiling CAO: From Cryptographic Specifications to C Implementations
PDF
Galois: A Language for Proofs Using Galois Connections and Fork Algebras
PDF
On the Design of a Galculator
PDF
Galculator: Functional Prototype of a Galois-connection Based Proof Assistant
PDF
On the Design of a Galculator
PDF
Machine Assisted Verification Tools for Cryptography
Compiling CAO: From Cryptographic Specifications to C Implementations
Galois: A Language for Proofs Using Galois Connections and Fork Algebras
On the Design of a Galculator
Galculator: Functional Prototype of a Galois-connection Based Proof Assistant
On the Design of a Galculator
Machine Assisted Verification Tools for Cryptography

Recently uploaded (20)

PDF
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
PDF
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
PPTX
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
PDF
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
PPTX
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
PPTX
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
PPTX
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
PPTX
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
PDF
August Patch Tuesday
PPTX
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
PDF
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
PDF
A novel scalable deep ensemble learning framework for big data classification...
PDF
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
PPTX
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
PDF
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
PDF
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
PDF
Web App vs Mobile App What Should You Build First.pdf
PDF
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
PDF
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
PDF
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf
Getting started with AI Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Hindi spoken digit analysis for native and non-native speakers
The various Industrial Revolutions .pptx
TrustArc Webinar - Click, Consent, Trust: Winning the Privacy Game
TechTalks-8-2019-Service-Management-ITIL-Refresh-ITIL-4-Framework-Supports-Ou...
OMC Textile Division Presentation 2021.pptx
MicrosoftCybserSecurityReferenceArchitecture-April-2025.pptx
observCloud-Native Containerability and monitoring.pptx
August Patch Tuesday
TLE Review Electricity (Electricity).pptx
Hybrid model detection and classification of lung cancer
A novel scalable deep ensemble learning framework for big data classification...
ENT215_Completing-a-large-scale-migration-and-modernization-with-AWS.pdf
cloud_computing_Infrastucture_as_cloud_p
Zenith AI: Advanced Artificial Intelligence
Assigned Numbers - 2025 - Bluetooth® Document
Web App vs Mobile App What Should You Build First.pdf
DP Operators-handbook-extract for the Mautical Institute
Video forgery: An extensive analysis of inter-and intra-frame manipulation al...
Architecture types and enterprise applications.pdf

Dependent Types for Cryptography Implementations

  • 1. Dependent Types For Cryptography Implementations Paulo Silva Manuel Barbosa HASLab, Departamento de Informática Universidade do Minho Portugal June 14, 2011
  • 2. Motivation Cryptographic software demands high-quality implementations The CAO language was developed close to cryptographic standards making the implementation easier and more reliable This language is strongly typed with explicit type sizes Improves safety but makes it less general and usable Proposed solution: dependent types ⇒ CALF language
  • 3. CAO Language Small and simple domain specific language with imperative flavour Geared toward the automatic production of highly efficient target code subject to security-aware optimizations Type system supports cryptography types such as bit strings, matrices and field extensions CAO has a complete formalization of its: Syntax Semantics Type system We have proved that CAO type system is sound, i.e., “well-typed programs do not go wrong” A fully functional CAO interpreter is also available
  • 4. CAO Example AES fragment typedef GF2 := mod[ 2 ]; typedef GF2N := mod[ GF2<X> / X**8 + X**4 + X**3 + X + 1 ]; typedef S := matrix[4,4] of GF2N; def mix : matrix[4,4] of GF2N {[X], [X+1],[1], [1], [1], [X], [X+1],[1], [1], [1], [X], [X+1], [X+1],[1], [1], [X]}; := def MixColumns( s : S ) : S { def r : S; seq i := 0 to 3 { r[0..3,i] := mix * s[0..3,i]; } return r; }
  • 5. Limitations of CAO In CAO all type sizes have to be statically determined In the previous example, the MixColumns function only works with 4 × 4 matrices We would like to allow parametrisation of these sizes. For instance: typedef S<(n : int)> := matrix[n,n] of GF2N; def MixColumns<(n : int)>( s : S<(n)> ) : S<(n)> { def r : S<(n)>; seq i := 0 to n-1 { r[0..n,i] := mix * s[0..n,i]; } return r; }
  • 6. Dependent types A dependent type depends on a value belonging to the realm of program expressions Can be seen as families of types indexed by values In polymorphism, the type depends on another type parameter, e.g., ∀ α ∈ types . Vector of α leading to vectors of integers, vectors of booleans, etc. Using dependent types, the type depends on a value, e.g., Π n : Int . Vector[n] leading to vectors of length 5, vectors of length 13, etc.
  • 7. Dependent types Dependent types allow for specification of program properties in types, reducing verification of correctness to type checking Implementation and specification are kept synchronized However, type checking of programs using full-fledge dependent types is not decidable and cannot be done automatically To overcome this problem, is is necessary to limit their expressive power reducing the amount of verifiable properties Most existing work is theoretical or in the context of functional languages
  • 8. CALF Language CALF is a higher-level extension of the CAO language, additionally providing: Dependent types Higher-order polymorphic operators (map, fold, and zip-with) User-defined parametric data types Explicit constant definitions Module system (allowing module instantiation)
  • 9. CALF Language The CALF compiler translates CALF source code to CAO CALF programs are like templates which can be instantiated with concrete values, leading to multiple CAO programs Dependent types allow for verifying some important properties, without requiring code annotations or deductive tools, directly in the generic CALF code For instance, this allows for detecting many out-of-bounds accesses in vectors, matrices or bit strings The translation guarantees the safety properties
  • 10. Dependent types in CALF CALF has three different kinds of variable-like identifiers: Language variables Constants Index variables All variable-like identifiers have to be explicitly declared with their respective type (type inference may be considered in the future) Index variables allow the introduction of dependent types These are variables which can be used, not only in type declarations, but also in program expressions In the scope of their declaration, they are treated as constants They can be instantiated with any value of their domain type
  • 11. Type Expression Evaluation and Type Equality The implementation of dependent types poses two key questions: How to deal with type expressions which are not known at compile time? How to define equality, since we cannot rely on syntactic equality any more? CALF evaluation mechanism deals with type expressions that either evaluate to a value or to an expression depending solely on index variables Type equality is defined in evaluated type expressions, possibly generating additional constraints
  • 12. Type Equality Decision Two approaches are used to solve generated constraints to decide equality: Syntactic manipulation of the constraint expressions A Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) solver In our approach, two index variables are equal if and only if they have the same symbolic value Some additional restrictions (not discussed here) are imposed in order to guarantee a less complex implementation while maintaining the expressive power In practice, we often need unification and substitution instead of equality
  • 13. Safety conditions Sometimes the constraints cannot be verified although the program is correct Given a set of constraints, we have three possible results: The constraints are satisfied — The code is safe The exists one value for which the constraints are not satisfied — The code is not safe It is not possible to decide if the constraints are satisfied — Unknown case In the last case, the result is set by the user: succeed, issue a warning or fail
  • 14. Translation from CALF to CAO The translation requires two files: CALF source file Definition of data types, constants and function Specification file Concrete instantiations for the global index variables When modules are used, the import declarations have to be checked and processed accordingly
  • 15. Translation from CALF to CAO The process occurs in three phases: 1 2 3 The CALF source file is type checked The specification file is type checked against the information collected during the previous phase. A list of substitutions is returned with the required instantiations. This list of substitutions is used to generate the output CAO source. This requires collecting all dependencies between functions and types Several instances of the same function or data type may be generated
  • 16. CALF Example RSA fragment typedef RSAPub<(m : int)> := struct [ def encExp : int; ]; typedef RSAPrivShort<(m : int)> := struct [ def decExp : int; ]; def RSA<(n : int)>(k : RSAPub<(n)>, m : int ) : int { def c : mod[n]; c := (mod[n]) m; c := c ** k.encExp; return (int) c; } def RSAInvShort<(n : int)> (k : RSAPrivShort<(n)>, c : int) : int { def m : mod[n]; m := (mod[n]) c; return (int) m; } m := m ** k.decExp;
  • 17. CALF Example RSA fragment def const pq : int; def const d : int; def const e : int; def x : int; def y : int; def myPub : RSAPub<(pq)>; def myPriv : RSAPrivShort<(pq)>; def Calc() : void { myPub.encExp := e; y := RSA<(pq)>(myPub,x); }
  • 18. CALF Example Specification file def const pq : int := 35; def const d : int := 11; def const e : int := 11;
  • 19. CALF Example Generated CAO code typedef RSAPub_35 := struct[def encExp_35 : int;]; def RSA_35(k : RSAPub_35, m : int) : int { def c : mod[35]; c := (mod[35]) m; c := c ** k.encExp_35; return (int) c; } def myPub : RSAPub_35; def x : int; def y : int; def Calc() : void { myPub.encExp_35 := 11; y := RSA_35(myPub, x); }
  • 21. Ongoing Work Introducing explicit constraints in index variables (very important for practical usage) Improving the generation and solving of constraints in iterative statements Improving the module system (object oriented?) Publication of results