3
Most read
5
Most read
6
Most read
Practice Problem
Chi-Squared Test for Homogeneity
 Opinion polls used to exclude cell phones from their
random digit dialing. If the opinions of people with cell
phones differ from those people who have landlines, then
the poll may not represent the entire population. A group
of people got together and interviewed separate random
samples of cell-only and landline telephone users who
were less than 30 years old. Do we have sufficient
evidence to suggest that the opinion of cell phone users
differ from landline users?
Cell-Only Sample Landline Sample
Democrat 49 47
Independent 15 27
Republican 32 30
Take a few minutes to
work this problem on your
own sheet of paper and
then flip through this
slideshow in order to
check your work!
Hypotheses
 H0: There is no difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political
affiliation for people under 30 years old.
 Ha: There is a difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political
affiliation for people under 30 years old.
Check conditions:
 Random – it was stated in the problem that they interviewed separate random
samples.
 Large Sample Size – need to check expected counts to make sure they are all
at least 5.
 EXPECTED COUNTS:
Cell-Only Sample Landline Sample
Democrat 46.08 49.92
Independent 20.16 21.84
Republican 29.76 32.24
Do the math!
 𝜒2
=
(𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑−𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑)2
𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑
 𝜒2 =
(49−46.08)2
46.08
+
(47−49.92)2
49.92
+ ⋯
(30−32.24)2
32.24
= 3.2199
 df: 2
 P-value: 0.199897
State conclusion!
 Since the p-value is so large, we do not have enough evidence to reject the
null hypothesis.
 There is no difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political
affiliation for people under 30 years old.

More Related Content

PPTX
475 2015 media effects stereotypes & knowledge up
PPTX
Association example
PPTX
Module 12 lesson 1 Example
DOCX
Act 8 10 claves para la implementación de tendencias y enfoques innovadores
DOCX
PPTX
Organizacion politica del incario
PPTX
Drafts and plans for poster
PDF
Elisa Ferri for David Yurman
475 2015 media effects stereotypes & knowledge up
Association example
Module 12 lesson 1 Example
Act 8 10 claves para la implementación de tendencias y enfoques innovadores
Organizacion politica del incario
Drafts and plans for poster
Elisa Ferri for David Yurman

Viewers also liked (14)

DOCX
Act 8. tallerpractico10 yicenia correa urrego
PPTX
Contencioso tributario
PPTX
COSTOS
PPTX
Second Week of Camp: KinderCamp
PDF
Приложение Petralex для обучения слабослышащих студентов
PPTX
media cwrk
PPTX
As media week 9
PPTX
Writing Qualitative Research Reports PowerPoint
PDF
CohnReznick Private Equity Services
PDF
Yin yang 2017
PPT
PPTX
Product Marketing Vs Content Marketing
PDF
The Art of Fiction Writing
Act 8. tallerpractico10 yicenia correa urrego
Contencioso tributario
COSTOS
Second Week of Camp: KinderCamp
Приложение Petralex для обучения слабослышащих студентов
media cwrk
As media week 9
Writing Qualitative Research Reports PowerPoint
CohnReznick Private Equity Services
Yin yang 2017
Product Marketing Vs Content Marketing
The Art of Fiction Writing
Ad

Similar to Homogeneity example (7)

PPTX
chi-squaretestsusingspss-220124170244.pptx
PPTX
Chi square goodness of fit test
PPT
Ap stats survey project
PPTX
Hypothesis Testing
DOC
Chi square tests
PPTX
Hypothesis test business research methods presentation
PPT
Chapter12
chi-squaretestsusingspss-220124170244.pptx
Chi square goodness of fit test
Ap stats survey project
Hypothesis Testing
Chi square tests
Hypothesis test business research methods presentation
Chapter12
Ad

More from Jonna Ramsey (20)

PPTX
Simulations
PPTX
PPSX
Even and off functions basic presentation with questions 2
PPT
Review
PPT
Range alg worked
PPT
Domain alg worked
PPT
Dr graphically worked
PPT
Functions worked
PPT
9.4 part 2.ppt worked
PPT
9.4 part 1.ppt worked
PPT
Review day
PPT
Inverses day 2 worked
PPT
9.4 part 4.ppt worked
PPT
9.4 part 3.ppt worked
PPT
9.4 part 1 and 2 combined worked
PPT
Inverses day 1 worked
PPT
Comp decomp worked
PPT
Inequalities day 2 worked
PPT
Inequalities day 1 worked
PPT
Day 6 parametric worked
Simulations
Even and off functions basic presentation with questions 2
Review
Range alg worked
Domain alg worked
Dr graphically worked
Functions worked
9.4 part 2.ppt worked
9.4 part 1.ppt worked
Review day
Inverses day 2 worked
9.4 part 4.ppt worked
9.4 part 3.ppt worked
9.4 part 1 and 2 combined worked
Inverses day 1 worked
Comp decomp worked
Inequalities day 2 worked
Inequalities day 1 worked
Day 6 parametric worked

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
PDF
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
PDF
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
PPTX
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
PDF
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
PPTX
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
PPTX
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
PDF
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
PDF
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
PDF
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
PDF
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
PDF
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
PPTX
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
PDF
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
PDF
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
PDF
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
PPTX
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
PPTX
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
PDF
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
PPTX
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx
Chinmaya Tiranga Azadi Quiz (Class 7-8 )
David L Page_DCI Research Study Journey_how Methodology can inform one's prac...
Paper A Mock Exam 9_ Attempt review.pdf.
A powerpoint presentation on the Revised K-10 Science Shaping Paper
ChatGPT for Dummies - Pam Baker Ccesa007.pdf
TNA_Presentation-1-Final(SAVE)) (1).pptx
Introduction to pro and eukaryotes and differences.pptx
FOISHS ANNUAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2025.pdf
Trump Administration's workforce development strategy
BP 704 T. NOVEL DRUG DELIVERY SYSTEMS (UNIT 2).pdf
Chinmaya Tiranga quiz Grand Finale.pdf
IGGE1 Understanding the Self1234567891011
ELIAS-SEZIURE AND EPilepsy semmioan session.pptx
احياء السادس العلمي - الفصل الثالث (التكاثر) منهج متميزين/كلية بغداد/موهوبين
LDMMIA Reiki Yoga Finals Review Spring Summer
CISA (Certified Information Systems Auditor) Domain-Wise Summary.pdf
Onco Emergencies - Spinal cord compression Superior vena cava syndrome Febr...
Share_Module_2_Power_conflict_and_negotiation.pptx
Weekly quiz Compilation Jan -July 25.pdf
History, Philosophy and sociology of education (1).pptx

Homogeneity example

  • 2.  Opinion polls used to exclude cell phones from their random digit dialing. If the opinions of people with cell phones differ from those people who have landlines, then the poll may not represent the entire population. A group of people got together and interviewed separate random samples of cell-only and landline telephone users who were less than 30 years old. Do we have sufficient evidence to suggest that the opinion of cell phone users differ from landline users? Cell-Only Sample Landline Sample Democrat 49 47 Independent 15 27 Republican 32 30
  • 3. Take a few minutes to work this problem on your own sheet of paper and then flip through this slideshow in order to check your work!
  • 4. Hypotheses  H0: There is no difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political affiliation for people under 30 years old.  Ha: There is a difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political affiliation for people under 30 years old.
  • 5. Check conditions:  Random – it was stated in the problem that they interviewed separate random samples.  Large Sample Size – need to check expected counts to make sure they are all at least 5.  EXPECTED COUNTS: Cell-Only Sample Landline Sample Democrat 46.08 49.92 Independent 20.16 21.84 Republican 29.76 32.24
  • 6. Do the math!  𝜒2 = (𝑜𝑏𝑠𝑒𝑟𝑣𝑒𝑑−𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑)2 𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑒𝑑  𝜒2 = (49−46.08)2 46.08 + (47−49.92)2 49.92 + ⋯ (30−32.24)2 32.24 = 3.2199  df: 2  P-value: 0.199897
  • 7. State conclusion!  Since the p-value is so large, we do not have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis.  There is no difference in which type of phone is sampled and the political affiliation for people under 30 years old.