Idef v4

Integrated Definition (IDEF)
Modeling Techniques
Ozgun Demirag
Andy Johnson
Dima Nazzal
Yen-Tai Wan

Outline
What is IDEF?
IDEF Family:
 Overview
 Examples
 Strengths and Weaknesses
Rasmussen - Design Maps Definition

What is IDEF?
Definition: IDEF is the common name referring to
classes of enterprise modeling languages.
Objective: IDEF is used for modeling activities
necessary to support system analysis, design,
improvement or integration.
Originally, IDEF was developed to enhance
communication among people trying to understand
the system. Now, IDEF is being used for
documentation, understanding, design, analysis,
planning, and Integration.

IDEF History
In the 1970’s, IDEF0 originated in the U.S. Air
Force under the Integrated Computer Aided
Manufacturing(ICAM) program from a well-
established graphical language, the
Structured Analysis and Design Technique
(SADT).

IDEF Family
IDEF Family of Methods:
 IDEF0: for Function Modeling (purpose:description)
 IDEF1: for Information Modeling.
(purpose:description)
 IDEF1x: for Data Modeling. (purpose:design)
 IDEF3: for Process Modeling. (purpose:description)
 IDEF4: for Object-Oriented Design.
(purpose:design)
 IDEF5: for Ontology Description Capture.
(purpose:description)

IDEF0- Function Modeling
Method
IDEF0 models the decisions, actions, and
activities of an organization or system, in
order to communicate the functional
perspective of a system.
IDEF0 models are created as one of the first
tasks of a system development effort because
they describe:
 the functions that are performed,
 what is needed to perform those functions,
IDEF0 was released as a standard for Function
Modeling by the Computer Systems Laboratory of the
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
(1993)

Method
Syntax:
 Context Diagram: is a model of the function at the
highest level of inputs, controls, outputs, and
mechanisms
Mechanisms
Function Name
Controls
Inputs Outputs
• Inputs: items that trigger the activity
• Controls: guide or regulate the activity
• Mechanisms: systems, people,
equipment used to perform the activity
• Outputs: results of performing the
activity

Method
Decomposition Diagram: links together the
context diagrams

Method
STRENGTHS
 The model has proven effective in detailing the system
activities for function modeling.
 IDEF0 models provide an abstraction away from timing,
sequencing and decision logic. However, it is easy to use
IDEF0 for modeling activity sequences whenever needed.
(Order the activities from left to right in the decomposition
diagram).
 Provides a concise description of systems, by using the
ICOMS. (Inputs, Controls, Output, Mechanism)
 The hierarchical nature of IDEF0 allows the system to be
easily refined into greater detail until the model is as
descriptive as necessary for the decision making task.

Method
WEAKNESSES
 IDEF models might be so concise that only the domain
experts can understand.
 IDEF models are sometimes misinterpreted as representing
a sequence of activities.
 The abstraction away from timing, sequencing and decision
logic leads to comprehension difficulties for the people
outside the domain.

Method
EXAMPLE (source: [4])

IDEF1- Information Modeling
Method
IDEF1 is a method for both analyzing and
communicating the structure and semantics of
information within a system.
IDEF1 models are used to:
 Identify what information is currently managed in a real-
world system, both automated system components, and
non-automated objects (e.g. people).
 Identify the rules for managing the information.
 Identify deficiencies in the current management of the
information.
 Specify what information will be managed in a TO-BE
implementation. (TO-BE implementation: Design of the
functional architecture)

Method
Main IDEF1 Concepts
 Entities: Represent the information maintained in
a system about the real-world objects
 Distinguishing properties:
 Persistent
 May be individuated
 Attributes:
 Key
 Non-key
 Relations: Association between entities

Method

Method
STRENGTHS
 IDEF1 requires active participation of the
information users, which serves to accurately
model where and how the information is used and
managed.
 An effective method for documenting the
informational requirements of an enterprise,
providing a foundation for database design.
 IDEF1 enforces a modularity that eliminates the
incompleteness, imprecision, inconsistencies, and
inaccuracies found in the modeling process.

IDEF1x- Data Modeling Method
IDEF1X is a method for designing relational
databases.
IDEF1X Model: Graphical and Textual depiction of
“What must I know to do what I do?”
IDEF1X is most useful for logical database design
after the information requirements are known and the
decision to implement a relational database has been
made.
IDEF1X was released as a standard for Data
Modeling by the Computer Systems Laboratory of the
National Institute of Standards and Technology.
(1993)

EXAMPLE (ref:[2])

STRENGTHS
 Powerful tool for data modeling.
 IDEF1X don’t have numerous variants, unlike ER.
 Depicts the rules governing the management of information.
 Used to validate the concepts in the associated IDEF0
model.
 Helps to discover underlying causes for problems.
WEAKNESSES
 The modeler must be experienced in order to create good
models.
 Not suited to serve as an AS-IS analysis tool.

IDEF1 (information Model) vs.
IDEF1x (Data Model)
Information Model Data Model
focuses on:
Information collected, stored,
and managed by the organization
Logical relationships within the
organization reflected in the
information
focuses on:
Actual data elements in a
relational database
Representation & structure of
the data
used for:
Problem identification
Requirements definition
Information system design
used for:
Logical design of databases &
applications
Physical design of database
implementation

IDEF3- Process Description
Model
“IDEF3 is a mechanism for collecting and documenting
processes.… IDEF3 captures the behavioral aspects
of an existing or proposed system.” (temporal
information, including precedence and causality
relationships associated with enterprise processes.)
“The resulting IDEF3 descriptions provide a structured
knowledge base for constructing analytical and design
models. (unlike simulation languages that build
predictive mathematical models, IDEF3 builds
structured descriptions.)”
“These descriptions capture information about what a
system actually does or will do and also provide for the
organization and expression of different user views of
the system.”
Sounds
Familiar !
Source: http://www.idef.com/idef3.html

Model
The development of an IDEF3 Process Flow
Description consists of expressing facts, collected from
domain experts, in terms of five basic descriptive
building blocks.
 Activity
Denoted as arcs
 Logic
Denoted as junction boxes
 Unit of Behavior
Denoted as boxes
 Object State
Denoted as circles
 State Transition
Denoted as arcs
Process
Description
Diagram
Object
State
Transition
Network

Model
Organizing Structure: Scenario
A scenario can be thought of as a recurring situation, a set of
situations that describe a typical class of problems addressed by
an organization or system, or the setting within which a process
occurs.
Example
Scenario:
Parts enter the shop ready for the primer coat to be applied. We
apply one very heavy coat of primer paint at a very high
temperature. The paint is allowed to dry in a bake oven after which
a paint coverage test is performed on the part. If the test reveals
that not enough primer paint has been sprayed on the surface of
the part, the part is re-routed through the paint shop again. If the
part passes the inspection, it is routed to the next stop in the
process.

Model
Process Description Diagram of the Example

Model
Object State Transition Network of the Example

Model
Other Example
Source: (Zakarian & Kusiak, 2001)

Model
Other Example
Source: (Bosilj-Vuksic’s , 2000)

Model
Discussion
 The statement of IDEF3 sounds like …
Domain
Instance
Model
Schema
Process
Reference
Model
Is IDEF3 a
good way to
represent
process
reference
models ?
Source: http://www.isye.gatech.edu/~lfm/8851/ISyE8851.html

IDEF4- O-O Design Method
IDEF4 method is designed to assist in creating object-
oriented programming software.
IDEF4 provides a framework for navigating an evolving
object-oriented design.
IDEF4 divides the object-oriented design activity into
discrete chunks. A graphical syntax highlights the design
decisions that must be made and their impact on other
perspectives of the design.
IDEF4 model consists of two submodels, the class
submodel and the method submodel. These two
structures capture all the information represented in a
design model.

IDEF5 - Ontology Description
Method
An ontology is a domain vocabulary complete
with a set of precise definitions or axioms that
constrain the meanings of the terms sufficiently,
to enable consistent interpretation of the data
that use that vocabulary.
General ontology construction steps:
1. catalog the terms;
2. capture the constraints that govern how
those terms can be used to make descriptive
statements about the domain; and
3. build the model.

IDEF5 - Ontology Description
Method
The IDEF5 ontology development process consists
of the following activities.
Data Collection of raw data needed for
ontology development.
Data Analysis to facilitate ontology extraction.
Initial Ontology Development to develop a
preliminary ontology from the data gathered.
Ontology Refinement and Validation.

REALITY
INTERVENE
COMPUTATIONAL
MODEL
SYNTHETIC
MODEL
NORMATIVE
MODEL
PLANNING
MODEL
OBSERVE
NARRATIVE
MODEL
SYMBOLIC
MODEL
The
“modeling
cycle”
I DEF

Rasmussen - Design Maps
Definition
Map 1: Domain, tasks, and user in
context
Map 2: Knowledge base
Map 3: Road maps for navigation
Map 4: Knowledge representation in
design
Map 5: Display composition

Side by Side Comparison
Map 1: Domain, tasks,
and user in context
Map 2: Knowledge base
Map 3: Road maps for
navigation
Map 4: Knowledge
representation in design
Map 5: Display
composition
IDEF0 (IDEF Function
Modeling)
IDEF1 (IDEF
Information Modeling)
IDEF1X (IDEF Data
Modeling)
IDEF3 (IDEF Process
Modeling)
IDEF4 (IDEF Object-
Oriented Design)
IDEF5 (IDEF Ontology
Description Capture)

Rasmussen Map 1 compared to
IDEF0- Diagram
Decomposition Diagram: links together the
context diagrams

Key
Both require an expert in the field to use
and understand the model
 This is a result of the method being a very
high level concept and developing the
details for any single application is not a
trivial matter

Advantage of IDEF
IDEF 5 attempts to incorporate the
vocabulary of the specific application

References
 Colquhoun, G.J, Baines, R.W, Crossley, Roger, A State of
the Art Review of IDEF0, International Journal of Computer
Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 6, No. 4, 1993, pp. 252-264.
 (2) Introduction to IDEF Methodology, USACE LCM
Manager’s Guide Version-2 http://www.usace.army.mil/
ci/impolicy/lcmis/lcma3.pdf
 (4) Bosilj-Vuksic’s paper (http://oliver.efzg.hr/~vbosilj/iceis2000.
pdf)

Idef v4

More Related Content

What's hot (20)

Viewers also liked (20)

Similar to Idef v4 (20)

More from Mandar Trivedi (16)

Recently uploaded (20)

Idef v4

Editor's Notes