An Encryption Algorithm To Evaluate Performance Of V2v Communication In Vanet

International Journal on Cryptography and Information Security (IJCIS), Vol.3, No. 2, June 2013
DOI:10.5121/ijcis.2013.3202 15
AN ENCRYPTION ALGORITHM TO EVALUATE
PERFORMANCE OF V2V COMMUNICATION IN VANET
Manpreet Kaur1
, Rajni2
and Parminder Singh3
1
Department of Electronics & Communication, Research Scholar, S.B.S.S.T.C, Ferozepur
er_rimpi@rediffmail.com
2
Assistant Professor, S.B.S.S.T.C, Ferozepur
rajni_c123@yahoo.co.in
3
Senior Lecturer, Chandigarh Group of Colleges, Landran
Singh.parminder06@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Wireless Communications are gaining more importance because they have opened new research fields by
extending data networks connectivity to environments where wired solutions are difficult to install. The
networks which are deployed in the areas where the needed infrastructure is not feasible to install are
adhoc networks. Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs), in which each node acts as both data terminal and
router uses wireless medium without the need of any centralized control. Vehicular Adhoc Networks
(VANETs) are subset of MANETs. The successful deployment of vehicular communication requires Vehicle-
to-Vehicle (V2V) & Vehicle–to-Infrastructure (V2I) communication with security to improve road safety
and optimize road traffic. The technique used for secure communication in the presence of adversaries is
known as cryptography. Cryptography refers to encryption in which a plaintext message is converted into a
ciphertext and this can be done with private-key or public-key. In this paper, an algorithm based on
private key encryption is used to make communication possible between two people with QualNet
simulator.
KEYWORDS
Mobile Adhoc Networks (MANETs), Vehicular Adhoc Networks (VANETs), Intelligent Transport System
(ITS), Security, Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V), Vehicle –to-Infrastructure (V2I).
1. INTRODUCTION
The process in which exchange of information via some transmission media takes place is known
as network. VANETs are used for V2V and V2I communication considering all the aspects
required by the process of cryptography. In Safety and non-safety applications of VANET, there
is a requirement of V2V & V2I communication.
B.Karp in 2000 [1] discussed Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) scheme in which the
default packet forwarding strategy is the greedy strategy, where the sender selects the closest
vehicle to the destination as the next hop. If the sender cannot find a forwarder based on the
greedy strategy, it forwards the packet around the perimeter of the region containing itself and the
destination. Giuseppe Ateniese in 2005 [2] presented a new re-encryption schemes that realizes a
stronger notion of security and demonstrated the usefulness of proxy re-encryption as a method of
adding access control to a secure file system. Maxim Raya in 2006 [3] described the security
problems of the emerging vehicular networks and it outlined the solution architecture and several

16
of its components. Tim Leinmuller in 2006 [4] aimed to define a consistent & future-proof
solution to the problem of V2V/V2I security by focusing on SEVECOM (Secure Vehicle
Communication). Pandurang Kamat in 2006 [5] proposed a security framework for vehicular
networks using Identity-Based Cryptography (IBC), that provides authentication, confidentiality,
message integrity, non repudiation and pseudonymity.
Xiaonan Liu in 2007 [6] described an Intelligent Transport System (ITS) which can be used under
the security pattern to provide the appropriate solving measures in concern with the security
issues of VANETs from some aspects. Department for Transport in 2008 [7] concluded that it had
been seen from various studies that the number of lives lost in motor vehicle crashes worldwide
every year is by far the highest among all the categories of accidental deaths. P.Caballero-Gil in
2009 [8] analyzed the features of inter-vehicle and vehicle-to-roadside communications to
propose differentiated services for node authentication, according to privacy and efficiency needs.
Zuowen in 2010 [9] proposed an improved privacy-preserving mutual authentication protocol for
vehicle ad hoc networks by using secure identity-based group blind signature, the private
encryption system and the public encryption system. Surabhi Mahajan in 2010 [10] discussed a
comparison between the two schemes that are used to reduce the overhead in authentication,
when roaming – proxy re-encryption scheme and new proxy re encryption scheme. Hatem Hamad
in 2010 [11] proposed a new method of message security by using the coordinates in GPS (Global
Positioning System) service.
Sandhaya Kohli, Bandanjot Kaur in 2010 [12] discussed that vehicular adhoc networks are
subclass of mobile adhoc networks which provides a distinguish approach for intelligent transport
system (ITS). The survey of routing protocols in VANET is important and necessary issue for
smart ITS. The proposed work discusses the advantages and disadvantages of these routing
protocols. Umar Farooq Minhas in 2011 [13] described an important methodology required to
enable effective V2V communication via intelligent agents. Nizar Alsharif in 2011 [14] explained
that the reliability of position-based routing (PBR) in VANETs is ensured by proposing a set of
plausibility checks that can mitigate the impact of PBR attacks without extra hardware
requirement.
2. SECURITY CHALLENGES
The necessities required to provide security in VANETs are:
1. Authentication: An authentication framework is necessary to identify and ensure that the
participants are whom they claim to be to operate securely in VANETs.
2. Integrity: Integrity is required between two communicating nodes to protect data
accuracy which is main security issue desirable in VANETs.
3. Confidentiality: The challenge to protect data content from the adversaries is
confidentiality.
4. Non-Repudiation: Non-Repudiation refers to somebody who possesses the private key
corresponding to the signing certificate with reasonable certainity but if the key is not
properly safeguarded by the original owner, a major concern can be digital forgery.
5. Pseudonymity: Pseudonomity is the state of describing a disguised identity. A holder that
is one or more human beings are identified but don’t disclose their true names.
6. Privacy: The protection of personal information of drivers within the network from other
nodes but extracted by authorities in case of accidents is a major privacy issue which is
desirable for VANETs.
7. Scalability: The ability of a network to handle growing amount of work in a capable
manner securely is Scalability, which is the main challenge in VANETs.

17
8. Mobility: The nodes communicating in VANETs constantly change their locations with
different directions and speeds making the network dynamic in nature. So, in order to
make communication successful, it is challenging to establish security protocols.
9. Key-Management: The key is used to encrypt and decrypt information during
communication process. When designing security protocols for networks like VANET,
the issue of key management must be resolved.
10. Location-verification: This is necessary to prevent many attacks and is helpful in data
validation process. Thus to improve the security of VANETs, a solid method is required
to verify the nodes positions.
3. SCENARIO USED
The choice of algorithm should be dictated by the purpose of the encryption when encryption is
implemented. Private Key encryption is used because it is faster than public key encryption.
However, private key encryption does not provide for digital signatures or the signing of
information. It is also important to choose well-known and well-reviewed algorithms. Such
algorithms are less likely to include back doors that may compromise the information being
protected.
The security policy should define acceptable encryption algorithms for use within the VANET
System. The security policy should also specify the required procedures for key management. In
order to successfully gain access to the information transmitted over the VANET, an attacker
must capture the entire session and use a substantial amount of computer power and time to brute-
force the key and decrypt the traffic. Unless the information is extremely valuable, any well-
known, strong algorithm is appropriate for use in the VANET System.
Figure 1. V2V Communication in VANET
4. ALGORITHM DESCRIPTION
The Algorithm implemented here in VANET system in a straight road is Private Key Encryption
in which i and j remain secret. Vehicles V1 and V2 are assumed so as to communicate securely
and thus need to agree on an encryption key.
1. V1 and V2 agree on two large integers a and b such that 1 < a < b.
2. V1 then chooses a random number i and computes I = ai mod b. V1 sends I to V2.
3. V2 then chooses a random number j and computes J = aj mod b. V2 sends J to V1.
4. V1 computes k1 = Ji mod b.
5. V2 computes k2 = Ij mod b.
6. We have k1 = k2 = aij mod b and thus k1 and k2 are the secret keys to use for the other
transmission.

18
5. IMPLEMENTATION TOOL
The performance results have been evaluated using QualNet Simulator. QualNet is network
evaluation software, which is written purely in C++ and is entirely modeled as Finite State
Machine (FSM). It can run on a variety of operating systems like UNIX, Windows, MAC and
Linux. It is equipped with an extensive range of libraries for simulating a variety of networks.
The architecture of QualNet comprises of Application, Transport, Medium Access Control
(MAC), Physical layer. A unique capability for accurate, efficient simulation of large-scale,
heterogeneous networks can be provided by the features of QualNet. A robust set of wired and
wireless networks can be simulated by QualNet. ITM (Irregular Terrain Model) can be supported
with the QualNet. QualNet executes scenarios 5-10x times faster than commercial alternatives.
6. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
In this paper, the different results have been evaluated using QualNet simulator. The results
shown indicate that the packet is sent between sender and receiver by using private key
encryption algorithm. This means the same key is used for encryption and decryption. This leads
to increase in throughput with reduce delay.
Figure 2. First packet received during transmission.
From the figure 2, we have measured the throughput of moving Vehicles communicating with
each other via Access Point (A.P) already shown in figure 1. V1 Communicates with V2 via
Access Point which leads to the calculation of the throughput of V1. From the Figure1, when the
communication starts between AP and V2 then the throughput of first packet is calculated at its
arrival. The first packet arrives from V1 having Node ID 1=2.8 seconds. The simulation carried
from the help of QualNet Simulator and the length of Packet = 1024 Bytes.
From the Figure 3, the throughput of Last Packet received by the AP from V1 (called Source
Node) =100 Seconds approximately is calculated. After the Packet is received, the Vehicle Node
sends the termination signal to do end of communication between two Vehicles with the Base
Station (AP) Node.

19
Figure 3. Last packet received during transmission.
Figure 4. Throughput observed during transmission (with private key).
The figure 4 represents the Throughput of Two Nodes with AP by applying Security Algorithm
and also calculates the speed at which the two vehicles move when sharing the data. The speed at
which the Vehicles move was 60m/s with a packet size of 1024 Bytes and approximately
calculated value was 4200bits/s.

20
Figure 5. Average End-to-End Delay during transmission (with private key).
The average end-to-end delay in a VANET means that the source node (V1) sends packet to
destination Node (V2) and total average time to reach the packet to destination Node. In this
Figure 5 the total average time was 0.007 seconds approximately. This delay was due to
retransmission and applying security Algorithm at 802.11 networks.
Figure 6. Signals transmitted between node to node.
The signal transmission in between node to node or vehicle to vehicle has been shown in the
Figure 6.This has been shown that each node sends packet to the other node and the sequence
number updates. This way the vehicles communicate at the transport layer when the transmission
starts between both ends.

21
7. CONCLUSION
Security measures guarantees that the transmissions of data are authentic that is data is accessible
only by authorized parties. The security techniques can be applied to vehicular users in Vehicular
Adhoc Networks. The algorithm used in the paper is private key encryption in which sender and
receiver communicate securely with the help of encryption key. The algorithm reduces delay,
increases throughput, provides authentication and higher security level in VANETs.
8. FUTURE WORK
The solution of the security problems is discussed (by the use of algorithm) that are encountered
in VANET. The performances of data transmission in VANETs can be tested by applying more
encryption algorithms to provide more security with increased throughput and reduced delay.
REFERENCES
[1] Karp B, Kung H T (2000) GPRS: Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing for wireless networks. Proc 6th
Annual Int Conf on Mob Computing and Netw: 243-254.
[2] Ateniese G, Fu K, Green M, Hohenberger S (2005) Improved Proxy Re-Encryption Schemes with
Applications to Secure Distributed Storage. Proc of the 12th Annual Netw and Distributed Syst
Security Symp: 29-44.
[3] Raya M, Papadimitratos P, Hubaux J P (2006) Securing Vehicular Networks. J IEEE wirel commun.
[4] Leinmuller T, Buttyan L et al (2006) SEVECOM-Secure Vehicle Communication. Proc of IST Mob
Summit.
[5] Kamat P, Baliga A, Trappe W (2006) An Identity-Based Security Framework for VANETs. Proc of
the 3rd Int workshop on Vehicular adhoc netw: 94-95.
[6] Liu X, Fang Z, Shi L (2007) Securing Vehicular Ad Hoc netw.IEEE.
[7] Department for Transport (2008) Reported road casualties Great Britain: 2008 Annual Report. Road
Casualties G. B. UK.
[8] Caballero-Gil P, Hernandez-Goya C, Fuster-Sabater A (2009) Differentiated Services to Provide
Efficient Node Authentication in VANETs.
[9] Zuowen, Tan (2010) A Privacy-Preserving Mutual Authentication Protocol for Vehicle Ad Hoc
Networks. J of Convergence Inf Technology.
[10] Mahajan S, Jindal A (2010) Security and Privacy in VANET to reduce Authentiation Overhead for
Rapid Roaming Networks.Int J of Comput Applications.
[11] Hamad H, Elkourd S (2010) Data Encryption using the dynamic location and speed of mobile node. J
Media and Commun Stud: 067-075.
[12] Sandhaya, Bandanjot ", A comparative Study of Routing Protocols in VANET", ISCET 10, pp.173
[13] Minhas U F et al (2011) A Multifaceted Approach to Modeling Agent Trust for Effective
Communication in the Application of Mobile Ad Hoc Vehicular Networks. IEEE:407-20.
[14] Alsharif N, Wasef, Shen X (2011) Mitigating the effects of Position-Based Routing Attacks in
Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks. IEEE ICC Proc.

22
AUTHORS
MANPREET KAUR is B.Tech in Electronics & Communication Engineering (2009)
from AIET, India. She is pursuing M.Tech in Electronics & Communication
Engineering from SBSSTC, India. Her research interests are Wireless, Networks,
Adhoc Networks, etc.
Ms. Rajni is currently Assistant Professor at SBSSTC, Punjab, India. She has
completed her M.E. from NITTTR, Chandigarh, India, B.Tech from NIT,
Kurukshetra, India. Ms. Rajni has about fourteen years of academic experience. She
has authored a number of research papers in national, international conferences and
reputed journals. Her areas of interest includes Wireless communication, and Antenna
design .
Parminder Singh is B.Tech in Information Technology (2006) from Punjab Technical
University, India. He has done M.Tech in computer science and Engineering from
Punjab Technical University, India. His research interests are TCP/IP, Wireless,
Networks issues, etc.

An Encryption Algorithm To Evaluate Performance Of V2v Communication In Vanet

More Related Content

What's hot (18)

Viewers also liked (14)

Similar to An Encryption Algorithm To Evaluate Performance Of V2v Communication In Vanet (20)

Recently uploaded (20)

An Encryption Algorithm To Evaluate Performance Of V2v Communication In Vanet