RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 1
Grant no. 186834 (ACCURACY)
Impact of integrating societal factors on the accuracy of
optimization-based electricity system modeling in 31
European countries
Xin Wen 1
Qin Alexander Crebas 1, 2
Kenneth Bruninx 2
Evelina Trutnevyte 1
1 Renewable Energy Systems group,
University of Geneva
2 Policy and Management, Faculty of Technology, Delft
University of Technology
SUMMER 2025 Semi-annual ETSAP Meeting
June 9, 2025
Nara, Japan
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 2
Backgroud
Energy system models should integrate societal factors for feasibility:
• Techno-economic models often fail to capture the real-world dynamics (Geels et al., 2016;
Pfenninger et al., 2014; Schubert et al., 2015).
• Energy scenarios preferred by citizens and experts tend to highly deviate from the model-based
scenarios (Xexakis et al., 2020; Xexakis and Trutnevyte, 2021).
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 3
Backgroud
Energy system models should integrate societal factors for feasibility:
• Techno-economic models often fail to capture the real-world dynamics (Geels et al., 2016;
Pfenninger et al., 2014; Schubert et al., 2015).
• Energy scenarios preferred by citizens and experts tend to highly deviate from the model-based
scenarios (Xexakis et al., 2020; Xexakis and Trutnevyte, 2021).
Despite attempts to integrate the societal aspects into modeling, it is still unknown what are their impacts
on the quality of the model (Trutnevyte et al., 2019, Fisch-Romito et al., 2024).
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 4
Research question
By hindcasting exercises in 31 European countries, how accurate are the following model
versions when integrating one or multiple societal aspects in electricity system modeling?
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 5
Research question
By hindcasting exercises in 31 European countries, how accurate are the following model
versions when integrating one or multiple societal aspects in electricity system modeling?
• EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux and Ohler, 2019)
• Perceived seriousness towards climate change (Schubert et al., 2015; Devine-Wright et
al., 2007; Süsser et al., 2022)
• Investment risks (Li et al., 2017; De Cian et al., 2020, Stavrakas et al., 2019)
• EU climate policy with investment risks
• Perceived seriousness-adjusted climate policy with investment risks
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 6
* D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022)
Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE
(Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022)
• EU climate policy
• Perceived seriousness towards
climate change
• Investment risks
Societal aspects
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 7
* D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022)
Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE
Hindcasting: Cost-optimization based
electricity sector modeling
• Techno-economic version
• Versions with societal aspects
(Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022)
31 national models (EU27, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland)
D-EXPANSE* model
Least-cost pathways
Historical pathway 1990–2019
Projection year 1990
1991
2019
...
(Wen et al., 2022)
• EU climate policy
• Perceived seriousness towards
climate change
• Investment risks
Societal aspects
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 8
* D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022)
Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE
Hindcasting: Cost-optimization based
electricity sector modeling
• Techno-economic version
• Versions with societal aspects
(Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022)
31 national models (EU27, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland)
D-EXPANSE* model
Least-cost pathways
Historical pathway 1990–2019
Projection year 1990
1991
2019
...
(Wen et al., 2022)
Deviations between pathways
under four model versions
Accuracy quantification
Deviations of projections in different projection years
under six model versions
• sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error)
• RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error)
.
Projection year 1990
1991
.
2019
.
• EU climate policy
• Perceived seriousness towards
climate change
• Investment risks
Societal aspects
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 9
Methods
• EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019)
Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model.
• 1) Yearly emission targets
• 2) Cumulative emission credits
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 10
Methods
• Perceived seriousness towards climate change (among EU citizens)
Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission
constraints in the model.
Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019.
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
Adjusted emission target
based on quantified scores
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 11
Methods
• Investment risks with WACC values (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) (Polzin et al, 2021)
Technology costs are recalculated by considering country-specific and technology-specific WACC values.
Constant assumptions
before 2009
Uniform WACC values
Lines in color:
Country-specific WACC values in time seires
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 12
Results: Accuracy quantified by sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error)
With societal factors:
• Emissions are less over-estimated.
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 13
Results: Accuracy quantified by sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error)
With societal factors:
• Emissions are less over-estimated.
• Installed capacity and annual generation: No single
model version shows a clear improvement in accuracy
across all the countries.
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 14
Results: Accuracy quantified by RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error)
• Inclusion of societal aspects increases the accuracy, albeit sometimes very little.
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 15
Results: Accuracy quantified by RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error)
• Inclusion of societal aspects increases the accuracy, albeit sometimes very little.
• Inclusion of more societal aspects does not necessarily mean a better accuracy.
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 16
Results: Technology-specific accuracy
• For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear systematic tendency of accuracy improvement.
Renewable
technologies
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 17
Results: Technology-specific accuracy
• For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear tendency of accuracy improvement.
• The inclusion of investment risks tends to improve the accuracy of the generation for nuclear power (e.g.
Netherland and Latvia).
Renewable
technologies
Low-carbon incumbent
technologies, such as
nuclear power
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 18
Results: Technology-specific accuracy
• For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear tendency of accuracy improvement.
• The inclusion of investment risks tends to improve the accuracy of the generation for nuclear power (e.g.
Netherland and Latvia).
• When considering investment risks, gas tends to be favoured over nuclear power and hard coal.
Renewable
technologies
Low-carbon incumbent
technologies, such as
nuclear power
Combustion-based
technologies, such as
gas
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 19
Takeaways
• Integrating investment risks has the most substantial effect on improving the hindcasting performance among the
three societal aspects considered, although not always.
• The highest improvements are observed for gas, hard coal, nuclear power, net import, waste incineration, and
onshore wind power (when integrating investment risks).
• Strikingly, modelling of the historic EU climate policies rarely improved the hindcasting performance as
compared to the model version without policies.
• There is coevolution of multiple societal aspects, e.g. interaction between EU climate policy and investment
risks.
Future work
• We encourage further studies to test similar methods using hindcasting and accuracy quantification.
• More investigation on better modelling of climate policy.
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 20
Grant no. 186834 (ACCURACY)
Thank you!
Do not hesitate to reach out!
xin.wen@unige.ch
SUMMER 2025 Semi-annual ETSAP Meeting
June 9, 2025
Nara, Japan
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 21
Trutnevyte, E., 2016. Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? Energy 106, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.038
Jaxa-Rozen, M., Wen, X., Trutnevyte, E., 2022. Historic data of the national electricity system transitions in Europe in 1990–2019 for retrospective evaluation of models. Data in Brief 43, 108459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIB.2022.108459
Wen, X., Jaxa-Rozen, M., Trutnevyte, E., 2022. Accuracy indicators for evaluating retrospective performance of energy system models. Applied Energy 325, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119906
Geels, F.W., Berkhout, F., Van Vuuren, D.P., 2016. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change 6, 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2980
Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., Keirstead, J., 2014. Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003
Schubert, D.K.J., Thuß, S., Möst, D., 2015. Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios? Energy Research & Social Science 7, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2015.03.003
Xexakis G, Hansmann R, Volken SP, Trutnevyte E. Models on the wrong track: Model-based electricity supply scenarios in Switzerland are not aligned with the perspectives of energy experts and the public. Renewable and Sustainable
Energy Reviews 2020;134:110297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110297.
Xexakis G, Trutnevyte E. Consensus on future EU electricity supply among citizens of France, Germany, and Poland: Implications for modeling. Energy Strategy Reviews 2021;38:100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100742.
Trutnevyte, E., Hirt, L.F., Bauer, N., Cherp, A., Hawkes, A., Edelenbosch, O.Y., Pedde, S., van Vuuren, D.P., 2019. Societal Transformations in Models for Energy and Climate Policy: The Ambitious Next Step. One Earth 1, 423–433.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.002
Fisch-Romito V, Jaxa-Rozen M, Wen X, Trutnevyte E. Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modeling (under review). Nature Energy 2024.
Schubert, D.K.J., Thuß, S., Möst, D., 2015. Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios? Energy Research & Social Science 7, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2015.03.003
Devine-Wright P, Grubb J, Pollitt U. Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review. Taking Climate Change Seriously: a Low Carbon Future for the Electricity Sector, Cambridge University Press;
2007.
Süsser D, Martin N, Stavrakas V, Gaschnig H, Talens-Peiró L, Flamos A, et al. Why energy models should integrate social and environmental factors: Assessing user needs, omission impacts, and real-word accuracy in the European Union.
Energy Research and Social Science 2022;92:102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102775.
Li FGN, Strachan N. Modelling energy transitions for climate targets under landscape and actor inertia. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2017;24:106–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.08.002.
De Cian E, Dasgupta S, Hof AF, van Sluisveld MAE, Köhler J, Pfluger B, et al. Actors, decision-making, and institutions in quantitative system modelling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2020;151:119480.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.004.
Stavrakas V, Papadelis S, Flamos A. An agent-based model to simulate technology adoption quantifying behavioural uncertainty of consumers. Applied Energy 2019;255:113795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113795.
Delreux T, Ohler F. Climate Policy in European Union Politics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1097.
References
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 22
Methods
• EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019)
Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model.
• 1) Yearly emission targets
• 2) Cumulative emission credits
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 23
Methods
• EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019)
Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model.
• 1) Yearly emission targets
• 2) Cumulative emission credits
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 24
• Perceived seriousness towards climate policy (among EU citizens)
Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission
constraints in the model.
Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019
Methods
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 25
• Perceived seriousness towards climate policy (among EU citizens)
Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission
constraints in the model.
Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019
Methods
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
1990 2000 2010 2020 2030
Targeted
emission
level
(%
of
1990
level)
CO2 emission targets
Adjusted emission target based on quantified scores
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 26
Result: The Netherlands
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 27
Result: Latvia
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 28
Results: Italy
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 29
Results: Portugal
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 30
Finland
RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 31
Sweden

More Related Content

PDF
Does myopic foresight modeling better capture the real-world energy transitio...
PDF
Evaluating retrospective performance of energy system models in 31 European c...
PDF
20151112 Conference Call on Economic Opportunities for Clean Energy
PDF
TOO4TO Module 4 / Sustainable Energy Solutions: Part 2
PDF
Il ruolo cruciale del "fattore umano" nella transizione energetica
PDF
USEPA9rT whole energy system decarbonization scenario analysis in the Energy ...
PPTX
The EnergyScape
PPTX
Michael Grubb: 2020 #Infra4dev Conference Keynote presentation
Does myopic foresight modeling better capture the real-world energy transitio...
Evaluating retrospective performance of energy system models in 31 European c...
20151112 Conference Call on Economic Opportunities for Clean Energy
TOO4TO Module 4 / Sustainable Energy Solutions: Part 2
Il ruolo cruciale del "fattore umano" nella transizione energetica
USEPA9rT whole energy system decarbonization scenario analysis in the Energy ...
The EnergyScape
Michael Grubb: 2020 #Infra4dev Conference Keynote presentation

Similar to Impact of integrating societal factors on the accuracy of optimization-based electricity system modeling in 31 European countries (20)

PDF
Energy and environmental impacts of biomass use in the residential Sector: a ...
PDF
A_Two_stage_approach_for_energy_efficien.pdf
PDF
DISCUSSION ON THE WORKPROGRAMME OF ANNEX XVI
PDF
Integrating TIMES and life cycle assessment models
PDF
AI BASED PPT FOR PROJCTS USEFUL FOR EDITING
PPTX
De-risking Renewable Energy Investments
PDF
IEA Technology roadmap solar photovoltaic energy 2014
PPTX
Benefits to Ireland from participation in IEA ETSAP Technology Collaboration ...
PDF
ETIP SNET: For an innovative and successful European energy transition
PDF
Climate change mitigation in Latin America: requirements for the energy secto...
PDF
Results of the Workshop on Sustainability Performance of the Energy Systems
PDF
Limitations in representing innovation in energy systems models
PDF
Integrated Assessments of City Energy Systems: City Planning vs. National Tar...
PDF
Using the TIMES-Ireland Model (TIM) to understand Ireland's Carbon Budget imp...
PDF
Decarbonisation Futures: Innovation Pathways to Net Zero Emissions
PDF
An Organized Review of Public Attitudes, Technologies, and Renewable Energy S...
PDF
Renewablesfullreportsmcpack
PDF
Francesco Vona
PDF
Welcome to ETSAP Workshop 2024 in Singapore
Energy and environmental impacts of biomass use in the residential Sector: a ...
A_Two_stage_approach_for_energy_efficien.pdf
DISCUSSION ON THE WORKPROGRAMME OF ANNEX XVI
Integrating TIMES and life cycle assessment models
AI BASED PPT FOR PROJCTS USEFUL FOR EDITING
De-risking Renewable Energy Investments
IEA Technology roadmap solar photovoltaic energy 2014
Benefits to Ireland from participation in IEA ETSAP Technology Collaboration ...
ETIP SNET: For an innovative and successful European energy transition
Climate change mitigation in Latin America: requirements for the energy secto...
Results of the Workshop on Sustainability Performance of the Energy Systems
Limitations in representing innovation in energy systems models
Integrated Assessments of City Energy Systems: City Planning vs. National Tar...
Using the TIMES-Ireland Model (TIM) to understand Ireland's Carbon Budget imp...
Decarbonisation Futures: Innovation Pathways to Net Zero Emissions
An Organized Review of Public Attitudes, Technologies, and Renewable Energy S...
Renewablesfullreportsmcpack
Francesco Vona
Welcome to ETSAP Workshop 2024 in Singapore
Ad

More from IEA-ETSAP (20)

PDF
Generalized levelized cost as a metric for explaining model behavior of linea...
PDF
TIMES2JuMP project status report; Learnings on the feasibility of Migrating T...
PDF
A platform for open, realistic, and reproducible benchmarking of solvers on e...
PDF
Integrated Long-Term Planning and Short-Term Reliability Assessment for High-...
PDF
IEA H2 TCP Task 52 Hydrogen for Iron and Steel Making
PDF
TIMES-NZ 3.0: automating upstream data processing for an open-source workflow
PDF
Towards a national integrated energy, land and food system model for long ter...
PDF
Development of an AFOLU module for TIMES
PDF
The plant-level decarbonization pathways and mitigation cost of global oil re...
PDF
Near-optimal solutions for long-term energy planning facing the possible crit...
PDF
Integrated TIMES-E3ME-PLEXOS-DASMOD Modelling Framework for Assessing The Cze...
PDF
xl2times: progress update & a proof-of-concept interactive notebook-based wor...
PDF
Liberating energy models from modelers Amit Kanudia
PDF
The potential role of alternative fuels in the decarbonization of hard-to-aba...
PDF
Future Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production Technology Penetration with Aspen-Based...
PDF
Integrating Detailed Petrochemical Processes in Global Energy System Models f...
PDF
Are Heavy-Duty Vehicles at a Crossroads? A Real Options and Innovation Diffus...
PDF
An Assessment of the Impact of Electrification for Integration of Offshore Wi...
PDF
Role of Carbon Pricing and Emissions Constraint Pathways for India’s Net-Zero...
PDF
Implications of Party Politics for Future Energy System Scenarios in Norway
Generalized levelized cost as a metric for explaining model behavior of linea...
TIMES2JuMP project status report; Learnings on the feasibility of Migrating T...
A platform for open, realistic, and reproducible benchmarking of solvers on e...
Integrated Long-Term Planning and Short-Term Reliability Assessment for High-...
IEA H2 TCP Task 52 Hydrogen for Iron and Steel Making
TIMES-NZ 3.0: automating upstream data processing for an open-source workflow
Towards a national integrated energy, land and food system model for long ter...
Development of an AFOLU module for TIMES
The plant-level decarbonization pathways and mitigation cost of global oil re...
Near-optimal solutions for long-term energy planning facing the possible crit...
Integrated TIMES-E3ME-PLEXOS-DASMOD Modelling Framework for Assessing The Cze...
xl2times: progress update & a proof-of-concept interactive notebook-based wor...
Liberating energy models from modelers Amit Kanudia
The potential role of alternative fuels in the decarbonization of hard-to-aba...
Future Low-Carbon Hydrogen Production Technology Penetration with Aspen-Based...
Integrating Detailed Petrochemical Processes in Global Energy System Models f...
Are Heavy-Duty Vehicles at a Crossroads? A Real Options and Innovation Diffus...
An Assessment of the Impact of Electrification for Integration of Offshore Wi...
Role of Carbon Pricing and Emissions Constraint Pathways for India’s Net-Zero...
Implications of Party Politics for Future Energy System Scenarios in Norway
Ad

Recently uploaded (20)

PPTX
Climate_Change_Renewable_and_Energy.pptx
PPTX
Plant Production 7.pptx in grade 7 students
PPTX
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio CNG Plants Stores biogas.docx
PPTX
computer of health my name i d kussta lpaggyhsgd
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Biomethane Storage Holds upgraded biomethane fuel.docx
PPTX
the solar system janDNsdnfanscssfsaaansf
PPTX
IMPACTS OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS -CHEMPROJ (11).pptx
PPTX
Minor Species of nutmeg, cinnamon and clove
PPTX
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
PPTX
14.1 Opinion Essay (Writing). to teach opinion
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Anaerobic Digesters Essential for capturing and sto...
PPTX
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
PPTX
Importance of good air quality and different pollutants.
PDF
IWRM - City University Presentation 28 may 2018-v3.pdf
PPTX
Untitled 1.pptxhhhhhhjjjbbbbb bikinis sis son ka s
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns various f...
DOCX
Double Membrane Roofs for Cassava Wastewater Treatment Captures biogas from i...
PPTX
Unit 1 - Environmental management, politics and.pptx
Climate_Change_Renewable_and_Energy.pptx
Plant Production 7.pptx in grade 7 students
Corporate Social Responsibility & Governance
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio-gas Tanks Reliable containment for biofuel gas....
Double Membrane Roofs for Bio CNG Plants Stores biogas.docx
computer of health my name i d kussta lpaggyhsgd
Double Membrane Roofs for Biomethane Storage Holds upgraded biomethane fuel.docx
the solar system janDNsdnfanscssfsaaansf
IMPACTS OF CHEMICAL FERTILIZERS -CHEMPROJ (11).pptx
Minor Species of nutmeg, cinnamon and clove
Microbial-Pathogens-and-Parasites-Their-Impact-on-Plant-Health.pptx
14.1 Opinion Essay (Writing). to teach opinion
Double Membrane Roofs for Anaerobic Digesters Essential for capturing and sto...
RadiationSafetyPt120252026nucchemis.pptx
Importance of good air quality and different pollutants.
IWRM - City University Presentation 28 may 2018-v3.pdf
Untitled 1.pptxhhhhhhjjjbbbbb bikinis sis son ka s
Double Membrane Roofs for Agricultural Waste Biogas Digesters Turns various f...
Double Membrane Roofs for Cassava Wastewater Treatment Captures biogas from i...
Unit 1 - Environmental management, politics and.pptx

Impact of integrating societal factors on the accuracy of optimization-based electricity system modeling in 31 European countries

  • 1. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 1 Grant no. 186834 (ACCURACY) Impact of integrating societal factors on the accuracy of optimization-based electricity system modeling in 31 European countries Xin Wen 1 Qin Alexander Crebas 1, 2 Kenneth Bruninx 2 Evelina Trutnevyte 1 1 Renewable Energy Systems group, University of Geneva 2 Policy and Management, Faculty of Technology, Delft University of Technology SUMMER 2025 Semi-annual ETSAP Meeting June 9, 2025 Nara, Japan
  • 2. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 2 Backgroud Energy system models should integrate societal factors for feasibility: • Techno-economic models often fail to capture the real-world dynamics (Geels et al., 2016; Pfenninger et al., 2014; Schubert et al., 2015). • Energy scenarios preferred by citizens and experts tend to highly deviate from the model-based scenarios (Xexakis et al., 2020; Xexakis and Trutnevyte, 2021).
  • 3. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 3 Backgroud Energy system models should integrate societal factors for feasibility: • Techno-economic models often fail to capture the real-world dynamics (Geels et al., 2016; Pfenninger et al., 2014; Schubert et al., 2015). • Energy scenarios preferred by citizens and experts tend to highly deviate from the model-based scenarios (Xexakis et al., 2020; Xexakis and Trutnevyte, 2021). Despite attempts to integrate the societal aspects into modeling, it is still unknown what are their impacts on the quality of the model (Trutnevyte et al., 2019, Fisch-Romito et al., 2024).
  • 4. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 4 Research question By hindcasting exercises in 31 European countries, how accurate are the following model versions when integrating one or multiple societal aspects in electricity system modeling?
  • 5. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 5 Research question By hindcasting exercises in 31 European countries, how accurate are the following model versions when integrating one or multiple societal aspects in electricity system modeling? • EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux and Ohler, 2019) • Perceived seriousness towards climate change (Schubert et al., 2015; Devine-Wright et al., 2007; Süsser et al., 2022) • Investment risks (Li et al., 2017; De Cian et al., 2020, Stavrakas et al., 2019) • EU climate policy with investment risks • Perceived seriousness-adjusted climate policy with investment risks
  • 6. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 6 * D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022) Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE (Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022) • EU climate policy • Perceived seriousness towards climate change • Investment risks Societal aspects
  • 7. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 7 * D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022) Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE Hindcasting: Cost-optimization based electricity sector modeling • Techno-economic version • Versions with societal aspects (Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022) 31 national models (EU27, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland) D-EXPANSE* model Least-cost pathways Historical pathway 1990–2019 Projection year 1990 1991 2019 ... (Wen et al., 2022) • EU climate policy • Perceived seriousness towards climate change • Investment risks Societal aspects
  • 8. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 8 * D-EXPANSE : Dynamic version of EXploration of PAtterns in Near-optimal energy ScEnarios (Trutnevyte, 2016; Wen et al. 2022) Methods: Hindcasting by D-EXPANSE Hindcasting: Cost-optimization based electricity sector modeling • Techno-economic version • Versions with societal aspects (Jaxa-Rozen et al., 2022) 31 national models (EU27, UK, Switzerland, Norway, Iceland) D-EXPANSE* model Least-cost pathways Historical pathway 1990–2019 Projection year 1990 1991 2019 ... (Wen et al., 2022) Deviations between pathways under four model versions Accuracy quantification Deviations of projections in different projection years under six model versions • sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error) • RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error) . Projection year 1990 1991 . 2019 . • EU climate policy • Perceived seriousness towards climate change • Investment risks Societal aspects
  • 9. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 9 Methods • EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019) Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model. • 1) Yearly emission targets • 2) Cumulative emission credits 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets
  • 10. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 10 Methods • Perceived seriousness towards climate change (among EU citizens) Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission constraints in the model. Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019. 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets Adjusted emission target based on quantified scores
  • 11. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 11 Methods • Investment risks with WACC values (Weighted Average Cost of Capital) (Polzin et al, 2021) Technology costs are recalculated by considering country-specific and technology-specific WACC values. Constant assumptions before 2009 Uniform WACC values Lines in color: Country-specific WACC values in time seires
  • 12. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 12 Results: Accuracy quantified by sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error) With societal factors: • Emissions are less over-estimated.
  • 13. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 13 Results: Accuracy quantified by sMAPE (Symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error) With societal factors: • Emissions are less over-estimated. • Installed capacity and annual generation: No single model version shows a clear improvement in accuracy across all the countries.
  • 14. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 14 Results: Accuracy quantified by RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error) • Inclusion of societal aspects increases the accuracy, albeit sometimes very little.
  • 15. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 15 Results: Accuracy quantified by RMSLE (Root-Mean-Squared Logarithmic Error) • Inclusion of societal aspects increases the accuracy, albeit sometimes very little. • Inclusion of more societal aspects does not necessarily mean a better accuracy.
  • 16. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 16 Results: Technology-specific accuracy • For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear systematic tendency of accuracy improvement. Renewable technologies
  • 17. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 17 Results: Technology-specific accuracy • For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear tendency of accuracy improvement. • The inclusion of investment risks tends to improve the accuracy of the generation for nuclear power (e.g. Netherland and Latvia). Renewable technologies Low-carbon incumbent technologies, such as nuclear power
  • 18. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 18 Results: Technology-specific accuracy • For wind power and solar PV, there is no clear tendency of accuracy improvement. • The inclusion of investment risks tends to improve the accuracy of the generation for nuclear power (e.g. Netherland and Latvia). • When considering investment risks, gas tends to be favoured over nuclear power and hard coal. Renewable technologies Low-carbon incumbent technologies, such as nuclear power Combustion-based technologies, such as gas
  • 19. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 19 Takeaways • Integrating investment risks has the most substantial effect on improving the hindcasting performance among the three societal aspects considered, although not always. • The highest improvements are observed for gas, hard coal, nuclear power, net import, waste incineration, and onshore wind power (when integrating investment risks). • Strikingly, modelling of the historic EU climate policies rarely improved the hindcasting performance as compared to the model version without policies. • There is coevolution of multiple societal aspects, e.g. interaction between EU climate policy and investment risks. Future work • We encourage further studies to test similar methods using hindcasting and accuracy quantification. • More investigation on better modelling of climate policy.
  • 20. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 20 Grant no. 186834 (ACCURACY) Thank you! Do not hesitate to reach out! xin.wen@unige.ch SUMMER 2025 Semi-annual ETSAP Meeting June 9, 2025 Nara, Japan
  • 21. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 21 Trutnevyte, E., 2016. Does cost optimization approximate the real-world energy transition? Energy 106, 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.038 Jaxa-Rozen, M., Wen, X., Trutnevyte, E., 2022. Historic data of the national electricity system transitions in Europe in 1990–2019 for retrospective evaluation of models. Data in Brief 43, 108459. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DIB.2022.108459 Wen, X., Jaxa-Rozen, M., Trutnevyte, E., 2022. Accuracy indicators for evaluating retrospective performance of energy system models. Applied Energy 325, 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119906 Geels, F.W., Berkhout, F., Van Vuuren, D.P., 2016. Bridging analytical approaches for low-carbon transitions. Nature Climate Change 6, 576–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2980 Pfenninger, S., Hawkes, A., Keirstead, J., 2014. Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 33, 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.02.003 Schubert, D.K.J., Thuß, S., Möst, D., 2015. Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios? Energy Research & Social Science 7, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2015.03.003 Xexakis G, Hansmann R, Volken SP, Trutnevyte E. Models on the wrong track: Model-based electricity supply scenarios in Switzerland are not aligned with the perspectives of energy experts and the public. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020;134:110297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110297. Xexakis G, Trutnevyte E. Consensus on future EU electricity supply among citizens of France, Germany, and Poland: Implications for modeling. Energy Strategy Reviews 2021;38:100742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100742. Trutnevyte, E., Hirt, L.F., Bauer, N., Cherp, A., Hawkes, A., Edelenbosch, O.Y., Pedde, S., van Vuuren, D.P., 2019. Societal Transformations in Models for Energy and Climate Policy: The Ambitious Next Step. One Earth 1, 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2019.12.002 Fisch-Romito V, Jaxa-Rozen M, Wen X, Trutnevyte E. Multi-country evidence on societal factors to include in energy transition modeling (under review). Nature Energy 2024. Schubert, D.K.J., Thuß, S., Möst, D., 2015. Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios? Energy Research & Social Science 7, 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ERSS.2015.03.003 Devine-Wright P, Grubb J, Pollitt U. Reconsidering Public Acceptance of Renewable Energy Technologies: a Critical Review. Taking Climate Change Seriously: a Low Carbon Future for the Electricity Sector, Cambridge University Press; 2007. Süsser D, Martin N, Stavrakas V, Gaschnig H, Talens-Peiró L, Flamos A, et al. Why energy models should integrate social and environmental factors: Assessing user needs, omission impacts, and real-word accuracy in the European Union. Energy Research and Social Science 2022;92:102775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102775. Li FGN, Strachan N. Modelling energy transitions for climate targets under landscape and actor inertia. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 2017;24:106–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.08.002. De Cian E, Dasgupta S, Hof AF, van Sluisveld MAE, Köhler J, Pfluger B, et al. Actors, decision-making, and institutions in quantitative system modelling. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2020;151:119480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.10.004. Stavrakas V, Papadelis S, Flamos A. An agent-based model to simulate technology adoption quantifying behavioural uncertainty of consumers. Applied Energy 2019;255:113795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113795. Delreux T, Ohler F. Climate Policy in European Union Politics. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, Oxford University Press; 2019. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1097. References
  • 22. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 22 Methods • EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019) Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model. • 1) Yearly emission targets • 2) Cumulative emission credits 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets
  • 23. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 23 Methods • EU climate policy (emission targets) (Delreux, 2019) Emission targets are set as emission constraints in the model. • 1) Yearly emission targets • 2) Cumulative emission credits 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets
  • 24. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 24 • Perceived seriousness towards climate policy (among EU citizens) Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission constraints in the model. Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019 Methods 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets
  • 25. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 25 • Perceived seriousness towards climate policy (among EU citizens) Emission targets are adjusted based on the quantified perceived seriousness scores and set as emission constraints in the model. Source: Eurobarometer, Climate change, and Europeans’ Attitudes towards Climate Change, 2009–2019 Methods 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Targeted emission level (% of 1990 level) CO2 emission targets Adjusted emission target based on quantified scores
  • 26. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 26 Result: The Netherlands
  • 27. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 27 Result: Latvia
  • 28. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 28 Results: Italy
  • 29. RENEWABLE ENERGY SYSTEMS 29 Results: Portugal